this is bbc news — with the latest headlines for viewers in the uk — and around the world. face coverings could soon be ‘compulsory‘ in shops in england — borisjohnson says, the government will decide shortly. do think that in shops it is very important i do think that in shops it is very important to wear a face covering if you're going to be and a confined space and you want to protect other people. and to receive reduction in turn. and to receive reduction in turn. more ‘new infections‘ than most countries — florida reports, a record high this is bbc news with of coronavirus cases. the latest headlines for viewers in the uk and around the world. the uk government publishes its care face coverings could soon be compulsory in shops in england — home borisjohnson says the government the uk government publishes its will decide in the next few days. most care home workers — are excluded from the uk ido i do think that in shops it is very government's new post

brexit immigration visa. the washington redskins — confirm — they will change important to wear a face covering if you‘re going to be in a confined their name and logo — after being criticsed — for a racist slur. space and you want to protect other back in the game — manchester city overturn their two people and to receive protection in year ban on taking part turn. more ‘new infections‘ in european football. than most countries — florida reports, a record high of coronavirus cases. the uk government publishes their post brexit immigration visa — but most care home workers are excluded the washington redskins — hello and welcome to bbc news. confirm — they will change their name and logo — the british prime minister after being criticsed — says, face coverings ‘should be worn for a racist slur. in shops‘ to help prevent we‘ll talk to one the spread of coronavirus. of the campaigners. he‘s confirmed, the government back in the game — will decide in next few manchester city overturn their two days whether to make it year ban on taking part mandatory in england. they‘re already compulsory in shops in scotland. the world health organization says in european football. masks and homemade face coverings, should be worn in public where social distancing is not possible, to reduce the spread of coronavirus droplets. our political editor, laura kuenssberg reports. let‘s return to the news that, off, a fast—track health and care visa has been unveiled,

as part of plans for laura kuenssberg reports. on, off and definitely or a new points—based uk immigration system when freedom of movement with the eu ends injanuary. morning the government has faced criticism off, on, off and definitely on. this morning very much on. face covering after it emerged the vast majority an elbow bumped to boot. but as the of social care workers wanting to work in the uk will not be eligible. prime minister want you to wear a mask or not? when in enclosed spaces let‘s get more on this now with caroline abra hams, should we all get used to this? yes, charity director at age uk. shejoins me from south london. i think people should be wearing in shops. and in terms of how we do your reaction to this announcement. that, whether we make it mandatory really disappointment when we heard or not, will be looking at the there‘s going to be a health and guidance. we will be saying a little ca re there‘s going to be a health and care frees up, it is only a care bit more in the next few days. only visa in name only. the overwhelming yesterday senior ministers said wearing masks in shops should not be compulsory. at the start of the majority of people working in care crisis government scientists will not be covered by the scheme. suggested they could do more harm than good. but that she thinking has what were you hoping for? we hoped shifted. face coverings are already that people who were care workers, compulsory on public transport and front—line care workers and care as early as tomorrow ministers are assistance, all the people that we likely to confirm we will have to have been hearing so much about during the pandemic, peoples and cover our faces likely to confirm we will have to cover ourfaces in shops in england.

that‘s already routine elsewhere. ca re during the pandemic, peoples and care homes, would be eligible, but it's that‘s already routine elsewhere. it‘s a real contrast to the advice it turns out they are not and that across the uk at the start. as is the real disappointment here. web evidence has built of the virus of the argument that the government spreading through the air, covering is looking longer term to actually up spreading through the air, covering up in shops became compulsory in have british workers paid better and scotla nd up in shops became compulsory in scotland seven days ago. up in shops became compulsory in scotland seven days agoli thatis have british workers paid better and that is the root out to so many of up in shops became compulsory in scotland seven days ago. i think we've gone and scotland from it being pretty patchy up until now the problems that your sector faces. until as of friday compliance that might be correct but it‘s going to ta ke probably been close to 100%. but no that might be correct but it‘s going to take quite some time to get there. so our suggestion is, at least for the next three to five photo opportunities for politicians yea rs, least for the next three to five years, the government should hold covering their faces and whales just the door open for you tightly —based yet. they will only be compulsory on ca re the door open for you tightly —based care workers. that is just sense, public transport and a fortnight. otherwise we are just kicking people for the sake of simplicity and out. there is numbers of vacancies consistency as well as being part of oui’ consistency as well as being part of our plan to help reduce the risk of and so the last thing you want to do transmission while on public is to make things worse. in terms of transport where it is not possible to maintaina transport where it is not possible to maintain a two metre physical the consequences of this decision, distance, it will become mandatory what you think they are?|j in wales. in other countries the consequences of this decision, what you think they are? i think you‘ll be harderfor care providers covering up has become part of to keep the staffing levels up, common culture as the virus has made particularly in those areas where eu its way across the world. but after workers tend to be concentrated in early doubts progress has been more thatis

halting here. labour says the workers tend to be concentrated in that is london and the other cities and also the southeast. also, it government should catch up. halting here. labour says the government should catch uplj halting here. labour says the government should catch up. i think theissue government should catch up. i think the issue here has been the lack of will be harderfor them and also the southeast. also, it will be harder for them to sustain clarity. so critical with these really good quality care because issues we have learned that from everything that had to do with this ca re really good quality care because care is a people business and we virus that we need clarity of really do need enough staff to do message. that people understand what it. so, in the end, it‘s going to be is expected of them and when that‘s or what disabled people who have to going to happen. again, rules are pay the price of this decision it emergent and what feels like fits seems like such a shame and and starts. what ministers would avoidable. there've always call evolution of the guidance. others might call confusion. complained of feeling secondary to coronavirus is still changing our world in so many ways it looks other health sectors. this comes on top of boris johnson different now. other health sectors. this comes on top of borisjohnson saying last week, to me her techie may care let‘s take a look at the uptake of wearing face homes did not follow the procedures. coverings in the uk compared to other countries around the world. recent findings from and in direction of what this the polling company yougov suggest 36% of people government is doing, your in the uk, wearface coverings assessment? the right decision for in public places, compared with 86% in spain, 83% in italy care, you definitely should have said, to have those eu based work is 82% in china and 73% in the us. continuing to come in. the fact that dr linda bauld is professor thatis continuing to come in. the fact that that is been rejected after so many of public health, different organisations, have called

at the university of edinburgh — for it, it does feel a bit like a slap in the face and it is really and shejoins me now. disappointing i do hope the government will think again. we have linda, welcome. are you surprised by seen a number of u—turns in recent such differing numbers between countries i just write such differing numbers between countries ijust write out?|j such differing numbers between countries ijust write out? i think weeks and months, presumably you are it is surprising. at the beginning of the pandemic or when the world urging the government to think again, butare urging the government to think again, but are you getting any sort health organisation declared the of signals that it is even a pandemic they‘re actually 70 countries that were advising or possibility? you never say never and requiring it. the first country in europe was the czech republic back they have been announcing things to in the end of march. and now there do with the scheme and over again over the last few months and so, is 120 countries. it does seem surprising but what i would say is maybe next time they make the that the science has moved on. and announcement, it will be more positive one and that is what we are we have more evidence now. which i think is why governments are pushing hoping for. thank you very much for for this. i have to admit, the uk is speaking to us. very late to the table with this measure. that's exactly the point i wa nt to measure. that's exactly the point i want to ask you. do you think we have been did the ring here in in america — england? other have been did the ring here in the washington redskins have england ? other countries have have been did the ring here in england? other countries have done announced, that they are this some while ago. absolutely. i changing their name. the name of the nfl team — has been widely criticised, think it‘s unusual for us. unlike as a racist slur against native many countries like taiwan hong americans. a review into both it, and the team kong, vietnam that have it adopted logo, was announced earlier this month after mounting pressure. face covering in flu season in years amanda blackhorse was part

of a group which won a legal battle past when they‘ve had previous against the nfl over the use outbreaks like sars. we are not used of native american mascots. i asked how important the decision to it here. i think there is a to drop the name was. cultural feeling that it‘s not something that we necessarily want this is definitely a monumental to adopt. but i really think moment for native people in particularly, as we look at the opening up of society across the uk, people going back into the office, eliminating racist mascots and back into retail, this is something names. i actually never thought this that we can do. and it‘s actually day would come and it is such a most groups are not a difficult thing to do. your experience in great moment. but also, i am scotland, it‘s mandatory in shops, celebrating with caution because i is that putting people off or encouraging people? it clearly is an read very closely with the statement of the washington team and they did added layer of protection. what is not see in their that they are going it like on the ground? i've been really surprised by the uptake. in to rebrand with no native team and my local supermarket quite a big supermarket i would say this time the reason why that is problematic last week i went in there probably is we have alluded that they would about one and five people wearing them maybe a little more. and rebrand, but they also wanted to yesterday after it became required honour native american people and at for us andi this time, native people are saying yesterday after it became required for us and i saw everybody with the exception of one person who may have we wa nt this time, native people are saying we want out of all of it. we do not had a valid health reason for not wa nt to

we want out of all of it. we do not want to be honoured in any way, wearing one. having a face covering. shape orform really quite a under mental change want to be honoured in any way, shape or form and want to be honoured in any way, shape orform and so want to be honoured in any way, shape or form and so they are going to retire their name and logo, that inafew really quite a under mental change in a few days. now it is just people being pushed by the government been doesn‘t mean that we are out of, clear about why it‘s needed and the we‘re in the clear,. fa ct clear about why it‘s needed and the fact that if you don‘t comply that could potentially be a penalty. i think enforcement of that is going to be very light. in your mind in doesn‘t mean that we are out of, terms of the science, is a clear cut we're in the clear,. is a number they will replace it with. for those watching around the world that may in terms of covid—19 compared to not be familiar with the story, sars? and the wearing of masks. explain why the team‘s name in terms of covid—19 compared to sars? and the wearing of maskslj currently is so offensive. it's think the difference between sars and this virus, is that there is pretty simple. if you have any team increasing evidence of asymptomatic transmission. we are definitely seeing that in the study. if somebody has come into contact with out there if you put a racial group the virus and it may be infectious to others and doesn‘t know that i oran out there if you put a racial group or an ethnic group in that symbol think face coverings are particularly important. the science has moved on. we‘ve also seen and as name, it is racist. you would experiments in some areas in europe never see something that for where one community is worn and the other hasn‘t. there was an african—americans, or african interesting study on a us naval people, you would never see anything ship. like all of us in the field i like that forjewish people and am racing to catch up with the evidence. speaking to my colleagues

their name as a racial epithet would never have that. and if you did, it i think there is complete consensus that people should be wearing them. will be a huge outcry. but for some with those numbers, compared to reason, that doesn‘t seem to apply other countries like all public to native people. and so, ourfight health messages, how important is it is been going for very long time and to be seeing the consistent thing we are finally and very happy that from all of our political leaders and repeating that message we are finally and very happy that co nsta ntly ? we are finally included in of and repeating that message constantly? absolutely. to be perfectly frank the last few days have been really confusing at uk racism. breaking news that the level. some leaders saying that it‘s important and should be required and chicago marathon has been cancelled because others not. around the world, brazil isa others not. around the world, brazil is a great example where political leaders hasn‘t been consistent with wearing a mask. i think people need of covid—19 and also the boston to lead from the front, show that they are willing to wear when marathon was cancelled for the first time that‘s not your 2a year themselves and give clear consistent history. the pushing back of the messaging to the public about why it‘s required, and what environment pa rents history. the pushing back of the parents marathon and back it up with an information campaign that just supports and back it up with an information campaign thatjust supports people to make that decision to wear when 110w. to make that decision to wear when now. linda, thanks so much for the chicago marathon has been taking time to speak to us on the programme this evening. cancelled due to coronavirus thanks so much. as the number operate. manchester city have managed

to overturn a two year ban on taking part in european football — of covid—19 cases meaning they can compete in next season‘s champions league. as the global number of covid 19 uefa issued the ban earlier this year after ruling the club had case approaches 13 million — the us state of florida — broken financial fair play rules by disguising the source has seen the highest number of some of their income. of coronavirus cases, recorded in a single day in the us. the 15 thousand ‘new infections‘, eclipse the previous high — recorded in new york in april. but the court of arbitration if florida were a country, for sport has cleared the club of that allegation. it would rank fourth in the world our sports editor dan roan reports. for the most cases in a day — they‘ve become accustomed to winning behind the united states, but this is among manchester city‘s brazil and india. meanwhile, there are reports that biggest victories yet. white house officials the club had been facing are briefing against, dr. an unprecedented two—year ban anthony fauci, america‘s top diseases expert. from the prestigious earlier i spoke to veronica zaragovia, a healthcare reporter champions league for a serious for south florida‘s wlrn station in miami. she told me how local leaders breach of financial rules but today were reacting to florida‘s record the punishment was lifted by the court of number of cases. arbitration for sport. they always pleaded innocent from day one, and it‘s good to see we have not yet heard from governor it‘s actually finally come to a conclusion, because to have rhonda santos not even on twitter, there have been no message about the that hanging over your head for so long, the fans, the player, the management staff, surge in the numbers. not only today it has been difficult. we‘ve had 1200, 12,000, surge in the numbers. not only today we've had 1200, 12,000, 600 surge in the numbers. not only today we‘ve had 1200, 12,000, 600 new cases which would‘ve been a record the saga began two years ago when german magazine der spiegel

if the 15,300 number hadn‘t been published leaked e—mails they said reported yesterday. and local showed manchester city had misled uefa over break—even rules. the documents appeared to suggest that of a £67.5 million sponsorship deal with etihad, just £8 million had been paid officials are speaking up. i was earlier at a press conference with by the airline with the rest coming the mayor of miami—dade county, but from the club‘s owner, we are not hearing from the leader the abu dhabi united group, an investment vehicle of sheikh mansoor. of the state yet. in terms of those city furiously denied wrongdoing and appealed, and today they found the club did not disguise equity cases you mentioned the figures funding at sponsorship today and of course the figures over contributions, but did fail to co—operate with the weekend, what is the capacity uefa‘s investigation. like in hospitals to treat those that‘s cost city a reduced sort of numbers? as you have been 10 million euro fine, but a ban that reporting the hospitals are not yet could have seen star players leave to the point where leche and and been devastating for the club‘s finances and reputation has been miami—dade county they are not avoided, and instead opening hospitals that were set up it‘s the credibility of european football‘s governing body facing scrutiny. for any situation like that. where hospitals would be at capacity for there‘s huge implications for uefa here, in respect topped but of course, they are very of how they go forwards with financial fair play, much strained, they‘ve been because it is a huge defeat contracting more nurses to come and for them. ta ke contracting more nurses to come and take care of patients. the state has the allegations they made also been sending nurses to some against manchester city were very severe, and city will feel completely vindicated. today uefa said it remained

committed to rules jackson health system which is the it says have helped to stop clubs states largest public health system overspending, but one of the architects of the regulations say here. yes, the hospitalization he now fears for football‘s future. manchester city can receive billions numbers are growing, the icu bed from the emirates and the whole contest will become basically occupancy rate is growing. just a a tournament, in europe, final thought then, there have been between saudi arabia, warnings for weeks now even the qatar and the united arab opening up in florida, given the emirates, that is the enormous lack of observance from so many danger that professional club different people in terms of the football is facing in europe. various advice given from medical relief for a club that practitioners and scientists, what are the projections if florida keeps has been the dominant on track as it currently is?|j are the projections if florida keeps on track as it currently is? i am worried to tell you that without any  vinny finigan is a former rugby league pro who‘s played kind of actual enforcement, even here in the county where i am miami—dade county, there aren‘t severe penalties if your not keeping your distance or wearing a mask. or for businesses. so the project and is bad if we are speaking just days after disney world had a partial

reopening. just a few weeks away from the republican national convention injacksonville which i also doesn‘t enforce mask mandates with any kind of penalty. which is open, open, that‘s the message here in florida. so unfortunately, i don‘t think that i can share any good projections just yet. the latest from florida. the director— general of the world health organisation, has said too many countries are headed in the wrong direction, and the coronavirus remains public enemy number one. he said the situation was only going to get worse if basic containment measures were not followed, and there would no return to the ‘old normal‘ for the foreseeable future. at a news briefing in geneva, the head of the un health agency noted that hospitals were filling up in several countries, amid dangerous increases in infection. let me be blunt, too many countries are headed in the wrong direction. the virus remains public enemy number one. but the actions of many governments

and people do not reflect of this. the only aim of the virus is to find people to infect. mixed messages from leaders are undermining the most critical ingredient of any response. trust. if governments do not clearly communicate with their citizens and roll—out a comprhensive strategy focused on stopping the transmission and saving lives, if operations do not follow the basic principle of physical distancing, handwashing, wearing masks, staying at home when sick. if the basics aren‘t followed there is only one—way this pandemic is going to go. it‘s going to get worse and worse and worse. let‘s speak to our correspondent imogen foulkes in geneva.

the warning could not have been any starker could it? know, and i think those words from the doctor, he sensed the frustration. the who has actually been saying this for many months now. this virus is with us. there is no vaccine yet. there won‘t be one this year, i think that‘s pretty clear. so, there are other measures that we have to take. and it‘s not rocket science. it‘s what the who has been saying. wash hands, maintain distance and wear a mask inappropriate settings where it is crowded. that is we the citizens have to do. and the governments. but the who is to delete not for governments to show leadership in these basic things. at the same time get a system to be able to identify cases, trace the contacts and isolate them. those are the only measures. they are basic, not rocket science but they require effort and leadership. and i think that‘s the

kind of frustration you‘ve heard from the who today. it‘s like please, how many more tens of thousands of cases do you want? how many more deaths among? before you put in place these basic things. we heard him say they are some countries going in the wrong direction. he‘s alluded to this before without naming those countries. is it clear which countries. is it clear which countries he‘s talking about? countries. is it clear which countries he's talking about? well, we all know that the united states and brazil have, leads the word in these sad table of cases. the who said clearly today they ain‘t americans remain the epicentre of the pandemic. and several times including in that clip that you played there, he spoke about mixed messaging. he‘s not going to mention donald trump by name, the who doesn‘t want to pick a fight. with washington, it‘s got enough problems with the white house already. but

when you have a leader, whether it‘s in the white house or in another country who says first, no i‘m not going to wear a mask then maybe they are for other people, oh maybe i will wear when occasionally, take it on take it off again. it is not helpful for people who need to know what clear things they need to do to protect themselves and to protect others. again, ithink protect themselves and to protect others. again, i think this is where the director is very, very frustrated. a body has been recovered at a lake in california during the search for missing glee actor, naya rivera. authorities made the announcement following a resumed search of the lake today with divers using specialised sonar equipment. the 33—year—old went missing last week whilst out on a boat with her four year old son. investigations are on—going and the police are expected to hold a news conference later. here in the uk, home secretary has confirmed that care home workers won‘t be eligible

for a new health and care visa under the uk government‘s new post brexit immigration system coming into force in january. it‘ll cover some people wanting to come to the uk to work for the nhs but not most people looking to work in social care. our home editor mark easton has more britain‘s care sector are still battling on the front line against coronavirus had been hoping new immigration rules would make it easier to recruit desperately needed staff from overseas. but today he came confirmation that despite its name, a cheaper fast came confirmation that despite its name, a cheaperfast group came confirmation that despite its name, a cheaper fast group called the health and care visa would not be available to carers. there is not one singlejob on be available to carers. there is not one single job on this list that relates to social care. outrageous. very disappointing. and even from european board of labour we still had 122,000 vacancies. and now that pool as closed and shrunk even for delete not further. where is we supposed to recruit from? carers

don‘t get paid enough to be classified as skilled workers. which means under the new points—based immigration system foreign care staff will not be allowed to come to the uk to work. in the columns this afternoon labour accused the government of insulting britain‘s carers. after the prime minister accused care workers of not following the guidance on covid—19 and now this. can the home secretary please answer a simple question? what does the government have against care workers? surely division for the social care sector is not to carry on looking abroad for, to recruit at or near the minimum wage, we need to prioritise jobs here in this country. some had thought the first a clap for a ca re rs thought the first a clap for a carers might have seen more support for lower paid key workers. the prime minister said today he wouldn‘t slam the door on people who can contribute to the country. but the governments immigration strategy is focused on attracting high

skilled workers. with government migration advisers think the solution to social care as recruitment problems is to pay british carers a more attractive wage. with the national wage, british carers a more attractive wage. with the nationalwage, i think you‘re going to be need to be talking about ten to £12 as an hourly wage before you make that sector attractive. it‘s easy to be the basic problem with that sector is it‘s very hard work. the basic problem with that sector is it's very hard work. the governments decision to end almost all immigration to low payjobs in sectors like social care, construction and hospitality. will encourage british employers to seek british replacements. and in a period of sharply rising unemployment that may be easier now thanit unemployment that may be easier now than it has been. in the longer term it may further complicate the economics of a beleaguered sector that‘s long complained of being treated as the plug relation of the nhs. despite surges of coronavirus in over a dozen states,

president trump is back on the campaign trail, planning rallies across the country. but this time around, mr trump is facing an economy devastated by the pandemic, a country in the midst of an uprising over racialjustice, and approval ratings that are hurting notjust the president, but the republican party as a whole. so much so, that the republican—held senate, which kept the president in power during impeachment proceedings, may turn blue. amanda renteria served as the national political director for hillary clinton‘s 2016 presidential campaign. she is now chairwoman of emerge america which recruits and trains democratic women who want to run for office. welcome to the program. is it too early do you think to be starting to think about at the clean sweep to the house the senate the white house? i'm always going to say it's a lwa ys house? i'm always going to say it's always too early and that should never be the way we think about what‘s happening here in america. i think 2016 was a big lesson in that. we have to make sure that we look at the race all the way through. this

isa the race all the way through. this is a particularly unique year. as you think about what is happening here in america. we have never seen this. and it has real implications not only on how people vote but who votes, who comes out and how people feel when it comes to the moment where elections are here. and we know just having been where elections are here. and we knowjust having been through an election against trump in the past that it election against trump in the past thatitis election against trump in the past that it is going to be a very intense election cycle with ups and downs all throughout. intense election cycle with ups and downs all throughoutlj intense election cycle with ups and downs all throughout. i will come back to the point in a moment. what do you feel conflicted at all as coronavirus rages through florida, texas, california and elsewhere? he states in the battle ground that wea ke ns states in the battle ground that weakens donald trumps position. of course, at a huge human cost. that's exactly right. that‘s the sad story here. it might be that democrats are ina here. it might be that democrats are in a better position to win but for all the most awful reasons you can imagine. it‘s because trump is trying to fake what is actually happening. he is not telling the truth. and the truth is catching up. and the problem with that is at in

this process of trying to win an election, more lives will be lost because of the way he has decided to run at least in the last several months. unfortunately, it seems as though he‘s going to continue on that process going forward. which means particularly in battle ground states, peoples lives are as we have to say literally at stake right now. very difficult. do you anticipate a fight, an election on culture wars, andres, on division, voter suppression, are those your fears? they are. what my biggest fear is the health of this country. and what you will hear from democrats everywhere. even as folks talk about the convention is, what how are we making sure people are safe and ok? along with that, we are noticing in our battle ground states some of the antics and tactics that the trump campaign is using. and a lot of the democratic work behind the scenes are making sure that the logistics of right, making sure that we are able to protect people as they vote,

giving options so that not everybody has to go to one site to vote. these are the kinds of things that everybody is worried about but particularly in our battle ground states where the stakes are incredibly high. the charge against hillary clinton or one of them was that she took for granted the black vote after ba rack that she took for granted the black vote after barack obama. and they simply didn‘t turn out for hillary. do you think in 2020 it will be different with biden? in terms of what we seen in america. no one is going to take for granted any vote this election cycle. i think you are seeing a different kind of energy within the black community as well. you are seeing march is out there. you are seeing march is out there. you are seeing demands for, here‘s what we need to talk about in the election cycle while we vote. and it really you have one candidate who is talking to them consistently. and thatis talking to them consistently. and that is vice president biden. there isn‘t another story here. there is a lot of work being done out there is making sure that this information does not harm biden is our ability to communicate truthfully and honestly to the african—american

community. hand on heart, tell me three of the biggest mistakes you made in the hillary pointing campaign. a couple of them. one, how much trump had the ability to move headlines full. and how effective that was as a strategy. in the idea that was as a strategy. in the idea that we could in some ways, move on the side of it have our own narrative that was never true. and is not true today. whatever the overall narrative and what trump is saying any candidate has to respond. number two is, making sure that we reaching all communities very micro targeted in the same way that miss information was actually targeting some of our same voters. information was actually targeting some of our same voters. and number three, the race is not done until it‘s done. and so any point in the campaign you have to be pushing hard all the way through. because polls don‘t matter. how important in terms ofa

don‘t matter. how important in terms of a reset is this election both in the us and in terms of the global reach for the us? enormous. everything here has been upended. the ways people aren‘t living their lives, the way they interact with each other the way they see the world, everything has been changing up world, everything has been changing up ended in a way that needs to be reset. the briefest final thought, in terms of those republican senators, do you think there might come a stage where they cut and run? they distance themselves from their own president? you know, i think there‘s been a lot of people have wondering when that moments can happen. as peoples lives are literally on the line, we haven‘t seen it yet happen en masse. i‘m not holding my breath for it. if you wa nt holding my breath for it. if you want a voice in this election cycle it‘s on you. everybody has got to get out there and vote if they want to have a voice and not rely on any party or person to carry it for you. thanks very much. thanks for your time here on today‘s programme.

hello. monday has been a day of contrast across the country sunshine and warmth for some, cloud and rain for others. the best of the sunshine certainly in the southeast corner today. this was kent a few hours ago. beautiful blue sky, temperatures peaking into the mid—20s. that‘s a mid—70s fahrenheit. further north and west there was some cloud and rain the heaviest and parts of wales through the afternoon. that is continued to drift its way southeast, we close out the day with sonny espousing scattered showers. the further north you are. that by the front still yet to clear away from that southeast corner during the overnight period. it will do so and then it leaves the legacy of cloud waiting with a few scattered showers the far northwest. the cloud will keep things relatively mild to

start our day on tuesday morning. overnight lows of nine to 15 degrees. it will be a rather cloudy, great start. high pressure is desperately trying to influence the weather story and quiet things down as we go to the weight. weather fronts that will topple across that high and introduce more in the way of cloud and outbreaks of rain. it‘s a rather grey start on a tuesday. because the wind direction coming from the northwest elite that is going to continue to drive him a cloud and drizzle along west facing coast. at the same time that weather front lose in wringing some rain into northern ireland. it‘s a cooler source or northwesterly direction just a little bit of brightness and the southeast. temperatures may well pique at 19 or 20 degrees. temperatures a little more subdued in comparison to what we had today. as we move through tuesday into wednesday, here is that high pressure trying to push from the atlantic. this weather front still stays with us on wednesday. wednesday is going to be a pretty

cloudy and at times rather drizzly affair. a tickly the further north and west you are. there will be a lot of cloud across the country. not that much of the way of sunshine and a light drizzly rain a bit of a nuisance along west facing coast. similar values to tuesday 1a to 19 degrees. high pressure potentially looks likely to influence tickly across england and wales as we head towards the weekend. eventually where they are going to see something a little bit drier and a little bit warmer. something to look 00:28:33,352 --> 4294966103:13:29,430 forward to. take care.