on for the ether deal which going on for the other deal which was about— going on for the other deal which was about trading in goods. at the question— was about trading in goods. at the question is— was about trading in goods. at the question is whether or not the european _ question is whether or not the european union will be willing to allow_ european union will be willing to allow britain to diverge in the government of the bank of england says they— government of the bank of england says they clearly must be able to. so long _ says they clearly must be able to. so long as — says they clearly must be able to. so long as there are strict regulations and those should be internationally recognised. but it is not _ internationally recognised. but it is not for— internationally recognised. but it is not for the eu to dictate with regulation should be governing the city of— regulation should be governing the city of london. it matters to all of us, that— city of london. it matters to all of us, that sounds a bit arcane and may be rich _ us, that sounds a bit arcane and may be rich folk_ us, that sounds a bit arcane and may be rich folk in — us, that sounds a bit arcane and may be rich folk in the city of london who worry — be rich folk in the city of london who worry about it, it matters towards — who worry about it, it matters towards all of us and andrew bailey is saying _ towards all of us and andrew bailey is saying that if a deal is not reached, _ is saying that if a deal is not reached, then it risked putting up a mortgage _ reached, then it risked putting up a mortgage rate and interest rates, higher— mortgage rate and interest rates, higher insurance premiums, higher costs— higher insurance premiums, higher costs for— higher insurance premiums, higher costs for foreign exchange, not only for british— costs for foreign exchange, not only for british customers and british businesses but also for european ones. _ businesses but also for european ones. so — businesses but also for european ones, so he is saying it is a bad idea _ ones, so he is saying it is a bad idea for— ones, so he is saying it is a bad idea for all— ones, so he is saying it is a bad idea for all concerned.-

ones, so he is saying it is a bad i idea for all concerned.- this idea for all concerned. lynn? this was andrew _ idea for all concerned. lynn? this was andrew bailey's _ idea for all concerned. lynn? this was andrew bailey's mentioned i idea for all concerned. lynn? this was andrew bailey's mentioned how beauchamp and naegele speech that he would normally give over at dinner but that that's a mansion house speech. we are in a different world now. but the call for the eu for city banks to comply and eu regulations and we all know why we left the eu. it wasn't to still comply with brussels red tape. with some of these demands are for britain in the uk to be healthy stricter regulations and that required of the us and switzerland and other countries like australia and other countries like australia and hong kong and even brazil, so they have been granted equivalence of that is how the uk is asking for. there is a caveat in there from andrew bailey where he does appreciate there might be compromises being made to essentially comply with that level playing field and that is the phrase we often hear in the run up to the brexit deal at the tail end of the

year. i really in a question of fairness come asking the uk to comply to the stricter rules, i think it would be seen by most as unreasonable.— think it would be seen by most as unreasonable. let's flash the front .a i e unreasonable. let's flash the front -a~e of unreasonable. let's flash the front page of the _ unreasonable. let's flash the front page of the metro _ unreasonable. let's flash the front page of the metro will— unreasonable. let's flash the front page of the metro will more - unreasonable. let's flash the front page of the metro will more time | page of the metro will more time before we go. number ten's pet photo call ended up being a dog dinner. a pretty cute dog, jack russell cross, carrie simons holding him. what if the controversy here? the question is whether or _ the controversy here? the question is whether or not _ the controversy here? the question is whether or not government - the controversy here? the question i is whether or not government money, your money— is whether or not government money, your money in my money should be spent _ your money in my money should be spent on _ your money in my money should be spent on photographers taking pictures— spent on photographers taking pictures of the prime minister's dog and his— pictures of the prime minister's dog and his fiancee. numberten pictures of the prime minister's dog and his fiancee. number ten have got themselves— and his fiancee. number ten have got themselves into a bit of a pickle whether— themselves into a bit of a pickle whether or not this isn't just themselves into a bit of a pickle whether or not this isn'tjust not make _ whether or not this isn'tjust not make this — whether or not this isn'tjust not make this the question should the government have three photographers employed _ government have three photographers employed number ten. government have three photographers employed numberten. back at government have three photographers employed number ten. back at my date which is _ employed number ten. back at my date which is quite a long time ago we didn't— which is quite a long time ago we didn't have — which is quite a long time ago we didn't have any at all. now there are three — didn't have any at all. now there are three. that's back in my day. one _ are three. that's back in my day. one of— are three. that's back in my day. one of them _ are three. that's back in my day. one of them takes pictures of dylan

the dot} _ one of them takes pictures of dylan the dog. numberten one of them takes pictures of dylan the dog. number ten tried to say it was ok_ the dog. number ten tried to say it was ok because the photographers or other working for the prime minister but for— other working for the prime minister but for the _ other working for the prime minister but for the whole of the cabinet. so maybe _ but for the whole of the cabinet. so maybe he _ but for the whole of the cabinet. so maybe he was given a promotion and nobody— maybe he was given a promotion and nobody totd — maybe he was given a promotion and nobody told us about it. five seconds _ nobody told us about it. five seconds. what _ nobody told us about it. five seconds. what is _ nobody told us about it. five seconds. what is your - nobody told us about it. i; e: seconds. what is your opinion? nobody told us about it. five - seconds. what is your opinion? three photographers. _ seconds. what is your opinion? three photographers. one _ seconds. what is your opinion? three photographers, one for _ seconds. what is your opinion? three photographers, one for their - photographers, one for their retirement photographers, one fortheir retirement and one previously so nonsense. ~ �* . ~' retirement and one previously so nonsense-— retirement and one previously so nonsense. ~ �* . ~ . . ., nonsense. we'll talk about it at our next round- — nonsense. we'll talk about it at our next round. thank— nonsense. we'll talk about it at our next round. thank you _ nonsense. we'll talk about it at our next round. thank you so _ nonsense. we'll talk about it at our next round. thank you so much - nonsense. we'll talk about it at our next round. thank you so much for| next round. thank you so much for both of you. thank you for watching. goodbye. let's get an recap of the events in capitol hill today. prosecutors in donald trump's senate impeachment trial have accused him of being the "inciter—in—chief" of last month's deadly riots at the us capitol building. it comes as the former president faces a separate criminal investigation in georgia, where he's accused of attempting to overturn the state's election results — if found guilty, he could face jail. from washington, our north america

editorjon sopel reports. day two of the trump impeachment trial, and harrowing new pictures and sounds of what unfolded on the 6th of january. the disbelief of the police. they are throwing metal balls at us. the prosecution argument — this was a direct consequence of donald trump's words and actions that day and in the weeks leading up to it. donald trump surrendered his role as commander—in—chief and became the inciter—in—chief. and he told this story of an african—american policeman who had fought the protesters for hours to defend the capitol. the trump legal team were given a kicking for their poor performance yesterday. donald trump was reportedly furious, and this republican senator changed his vote, he was so appalled.

the issue in hand is, is it constitutional to impeach a president who has left office? and the house managers made a compelling, cogent case, and the president's team did not. but it looks like the former president has the votes to avoid being convicted and banned from ever holding public office again. but even if donald trump's impeachment problems go away, his legal difficulties don't — they're piling up, and in georgia, it's been confirmed that a criminal investigation has been launched after the president tried to persuade that state's secretary of state to find him extra votes so that he would win, and notjoe biden. what makes this deeply problematic for donald trump, who was campaigning in georgia after the election, is that him asking for those votes is not a question of rival accounts, it's on tape.

election interference, one of the charges being looked at, is a felony offence. in other words, a crime that carries a prison sentence of more than a year. the mayhem at the capitol grew out of donald trump's repeated claims that the presidency had been stolen from him. it would indeed be ironic if he were the one man charged with interfering in the 2020 election. jon sopel, bbc news, washington. laura will be live from washington at the top of the hour it with the latest on donald trump second impeachment trial here on the bbc. for now we say goodbye to all of our viewers who are watching this on bbc world news. the british government has announced that extra three and a half billion pounds to

pay for the removal of flammable cladding from high—rise flats in england. more than three and half years after the grenfell tower fire, there are still at least 700,000 people living in blocks with dangerous cladding. ministers have been under considerable pressure to do more to help as our business correspondent sarah corker explains. i'm bankrupt. a lot of people are on their way to going bankrupt. caught up in britain's growing cladding crisis. thousands of people are trapped living in unsafe flats. it's not our fault, we're not to blame for this. they're now facing life—changing bills. people across the country are crying out for help. in manchester, ben's building has multiple fire safety faults. his repair bill runs into tens of thousands of pounds. we don't know where we are going to get that money from. we, as leaseholders, feel like we are just at the short end of this horrible, horrible mess, where we're just not being protected by the government, like they promised us

that they would. today the government announced an additional 5.5 billion for the building safety fund to remove cladding from tower blocks over 18 metres. for buildings under that height, there will be a new loan scheme, with repayments capped at £50 a month per leaseholder. and to force the industry to contribute, there will be a levy or tax on developers who build future high—rises. this exceptional intervention amounts to the largest—ever government investment in building safety. we believe in home ownership, and today we firmly support the hundreds of thousands of homeowners who need our help now. but campaigners have reacted angrily. they say loans for smaller blocks are not the answer. we've had people in tears, people are just distraught, and they don't know how they're

going to see an end to this. the amount of money they've released is not enough, and once again it doesn't cover all the issues. since the grenfell tower fire, safety inspections on other high—rise buildings have exposed not just flammable cladding, but other fire safety problems too, including defective insulation and missing firebreaks. but there's still no government money to fix these faults, and it's flat owners who are still facing big bills. labour called the proposals an injustice. homeowners shouldn't face bankruptcy to fix a problem they didn't cause. unfortunately, these proposals will still leave too many people struggling and facing loans, instead of being givenjustice. and the conservative mp for stevenage said he watched the announcement with his head in his hands. we don't believe that leaseholders should have to pay, and the very idea of loans, the way in which they were announced, it's a punch to the guts to millions of leaseholders up and down the country.

after years of pressure on the government to do more to help flat owners, this has been broadly welcomed by concerned tory backbenchers. but those stuck in flammable flats say it's taking too long to get a grips on this crisis. sarah corker, bbc news, in manchester. the body that represents tens of thousands of doctors across the world is urging the public not to watch copycat videos claim additional preventative treatments for coronavirus. the royal college of physicians sophos messaging is not only misleading but incredibly dangerous to. a video message on my step. today i will send you — a video message on my step. today i will send you an _ a video message on my step. today i will send you an important _ a video message on my step. today i will send you an important message. will send you an important message which can save us all from coronavirus. it is simple. and hell plain steam. plain water steam. ——

inhale. {lari plain steam. plain water steam. -- inhale. , , , inhale. of course this is untrue. but his videos _ inhale. of course this is untrue. but his videos have _ inhale. of course this is untrue. but his videos have been - inhale. of course this is untrue. | but his videos have been viewed hundreds of thousands of times on social media. i wanted to find out who had seen it and where it came from. hi, mama. how are you? fine, thank you- — from. hi, mama. how are you? fine, thank you- this— from. hi, mama. how are you? fine, thank you. this video _ from. hi, mama. how are you? fine, thank you. this video you _ from. hi, mama. how are you? fine, thank you. this video you sent - from. hi, mama. how are you? fine, thank you. this video you sent me, i thank you. this video you sent me, mum, thank you. this video you sent me, mum. how — thank you. this video you sent me, mum. how many — thank you. this video you sent me, mum, how many do _ thank you. this video you sent me, mum, how many do you _ thank you. this video you sent me, mum, how many do you think - thank you. this video you sent me, i mum, how many do you think people have seen this? so mum, how many do you think people have seen this?— have seen this? so many a thing. so many people- _ have seen this? so many a thing. so many people- i'm — have seen this? so many a thing. so many people. i'm speaking - have seen this? so many a thing. so many people. i'm speaking to - have seen this? so many a thing. so many people. i'm speaking to those | many people. i'm speaking to those ofthe many people. i'm speaking to those of the people _ many people. i'm speaking to those of the people from _ many people. i'm speaking to those of the people from the _ many people. i'm speaking to those of the people from the south - many people. i'm speaking to those of the people from the south asian | of the people from the south asian community in england, i discovered it had been seen in several cities and towns. i2 it had been seen in several cities and towns. 12 people told me that even tried inhaling steam after seeing similar videos. this man in the north of the country says people and his family are doing good. thea;r and his family are doing good. they are suggesting _ and his family are doing good. they are suggesting this _ and his family are doing good. iue: are suggesting this is and his family are doing good. iu2 are suggesting this is the and his family are doing good. iu21: are suggesting this is the way to get rid of it. people are worried. when they are worried, they look for all sorts of peers.— all sorts of peers. vaccine has is a roblem all sorts of peers. vaccine has is a problem among — all sorts of peers. vaccine has is a problem among black _ all sorts of peers. vaccine has is a problem among black and - all sorts of peers. vaccine has is a | problem among black and minority ethnic communities in the uk. —— in

vaccine hesitancy. they believe misinformation is to blame. we managed to track down the video. he is a chemical engineer and owns a clinic in the indian state. i asked him why he is spreading this false message. mi him why he is spreading this false messaue. �* ., , him why he is spreading this false messaue. ., , . message. all of us doctors infected with the coronavirus _ message. all of us doctors infected with the coronavirus of _ message. all of us doctors infected with the coronavirus of fire. - message. all of us doctors infected with the coronavirus of fire. they i with the coronavirus of fire. they have been protected. that with the coronavirus of fire. they have been protected.— have been protected. that is not true. have been protected. that is not true- doctors — have been protected. that is not true. doctors here _ have been protected. that is not true. doctors here are _ have been protected. that is not true. doctors here are saying - have been protected. that is not i true. doctors here are saying what you are saying is a live. and that you are saying is a live. and that you are saying is a live. and that you are putting those lives at risk. i am not very aware of what they are saying. i am not very aware of what they are sa inc. ., . , ., , saying. however what his intentions miaht be, saying. however what his intentions might be. doctors — saying. however what his intentions might be, doctors here _ saying. however what his intentions might be, doctors here are - saying. however what his intentions might be, doctors here are not - might be, doctors here are not impressed. it might be, doctors here are not impressed-— might be, doctors here are not imressed. , , . impressed. it is the most efficient tool, the impressed. it is the most efficient tool. the most — impressed. it is the most efficient tool, the most effective _ impressed. it is the most efficient tool, the most effective way - impressed. it is the most efficient tool, the most effective way to i tool, the most effective way to prevent ourselves from coronavirus. wow. infuriating. it is made me angry~ — wow. infuriating. it is made me angry~ these _ wow. infuriating. it is made me angry. these individuals- wow. infuriating. it is made me angry. these individuals should| wow. infuriating. it is made me i

angry. these individuals should be arrested _ angry. these individuals should be arrested for — angry. these individuals should be arrested for spreading _ angry. these individuals should be arrested for spreading false - angry. these individuals should be arrested for spreading false news. | arrested for spreading false news. and giving — arrested for spreading false news. and giving false _ arrested for spreading false news. and giving false hope. _ arrested for spreading false news. and giving false hope. in - arrested for spreading false news. and giving false hope.— arrested for spreading false news. and giving false hope. in my opinion i would have — and giving false hope. in my opinion i would have no _ and giving false hope. in my opinion i would have no time _ and giving false hope. in my opinion i would have no time for— and giving false hope. in my opinion i would have no time for such - i would have no time for such things. it is not a proven value. this will cost lives as soon as social— this will cost lives as soon as social media platforms get hold of any of _ social media platforms get hold of any of these messages they should be taken down. ~ . , ~ , , ,, ,, any of these messages they should be taken down. ~ . x ,, ,, ,, , . . taken down. whatsapp ss is made a number of changes _ taken down. whatsapp ss is made a number of changes to _ taken down. whatsapp ss is made a number of changes to slow - taken down. whatsapp ss is made a number of changes to slow the - taken down. whatsapp ss is made a i number of changes to slow the spread of fake news. while facebook told us it has taken on the post after we elected them to it. the uk government says it is spending £23 million on boosting vaccine uptake. but these messages continue to spread like wildfire. and for the experts, it is about the buckingham quickly and effectively to save lives. let's get the latest weather with sarah keith lucas. hello. it is a very cold indeed out there. the coldest night not only of the winter, but in more than a decade. so these are the typical temperatures we will see first

thing thursday morning — even in our towns and cities, minus 6—10 celsius, but in rural spots, it could be as low as about —20 for highlands scotland. —12 even across parts of east anglia. so sharp frosts and icy stretches around thursday morning. through the day, more cloud working in through the southwest, bringing a few snow flurries to the parts of south west england, south wales as well. most other areas looking dry, still i—2 snow flurries across the far north and northeast of scotland, as well. but temperatures struggling a few degrees above freezing and less in the way of wind—chill compared to recent days. now heading through thursday night into friday, a few more snow flurries across eastern parts of scotland, and we could see i—2 snow showers pushing into the far southwest. but most other places, cold and clear once again with temperatures struggling again a few degrees above freezing. bye— bye.

this is bbc news with the latest headlines for viewers in the uk and around the world. "inciter—in—chief" — that's how impeachment managers described donald trump as they lay out their case against him. democrats are using the former president's own words, tying him directly to the siege of capitol hill. because the truth is this attack never would've happened but for donald trump. as part of their case, democrats introduce never—before—seen security camera footage of the capitol hill riot. senators who are the jurors in this trial relive those terrifying moments.