�* priority mental health is a key priority across all age groups, and covid—19 has accentuated the problems and throwing the challenges into even sharper focus. we think certainly some people will have delayed getting help, and therefore may be worse when they come to us than they would have been otherwise. we also know that things won't just bounce back and go back to normal straight away, and that there are problems stored at the moment. they're giving hope in difficult times, but they know their work has a long way to go, with the toll on mental health of the last year becoming clearer by the day. hugh pym, bbc news, portsmouth. football now and wales have won a crucial game in their world cup qualifying campaign against the czech republic in cardiff. our sports correspondent, andy swiss was watching. there might have been no fans, but you'd hardly have guessed it. if it sounded like a big night for wales, well, it was. after losing their opening world cup

qualifier, victory was vital. but against the czech republic, not so easy. gareth bale should've scored, and didn't he know it. but it was still goalless at the break. after, it was a tale of two red cards. on the right of the screen, a shove to the face of wales�*s connor roberts. and patrick schick was off before roberts followed him after this challenge. it was ten against ten and seemingly stalemate. but in the nick of time, gareth bale crossed and wales found a winner. and danjames is there to meet it! relief at last, courtesy of danjames�*s superb header. but still the czech republic weren't done and only a last—ditch tackle from joe rodon kept them out. not their prettiest performance, but for wales, the 1—0 win was all that mattered. andy swiss, bbc news. that's it. now on bbc one, time for the news where you are. have a very good night. do you swear or affirm... the first full day of — do you swear or affirm... the first full day of testimony _ do you swear or affirm... the first full day of testimony was - do you swear or affirm... the first full day of testimony was an - full day of testimony was an emotional one that started with the playing

hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are madeline grant of the telegraph and former scottish labour leader kezia dugdale. welcome to you both. quite a few front page is already in. let's just look for what we've got so far. the metro leads on the police watchdog report — over the met police's handling of the sarah everard vigil earlier this month: the report found the police's response was "measured and proportionate." the financial times reports that the makers of the pfizer covid vaccine, biontech, will increase this year's production target with its us partner by 25%,

to 2.5 billion doses. the telegraph leads on the news that france and germany are in negotiations with vladimir putin to supply the russian covid vaccine to the eu, after the part—suspension of the oxford/astrazeneca jab. the i reports on a warning from professor adrian hill who led the research to produce the oxford—astrazeneca vaccine — who says britain still does not have enough capacity to manufacture doses. and the guardian has a picture of some youngsters enjoying the warm weather today in north tyneside — as the uk recorded its warmest march day for 53 years. 1968. so, let's begin. i was too young to remember it but it was hot for anyone outside. welcome to you both, nice to see you again. madeline do you want to kick us off with the metro? the vigil demo, cops and the clear, complete exoneration? i demo, cops and the clear, complete exoneration?—

exoneration? i think so. it reports they behaved _ exoneration? i think so. it reports they behaved sensibly _ exoneration? i think so. it reports they behaved sensibly when - exoneration? i think so. it reports they behaved sensibly when theyl exoneration? i think so. it reports - they behaved sensibly when they were honouring the vigil. i don't think it will make the story go away. i think people are still very angry and reacted angrily to the social media camps that were being shared. but i think from the beginning the police were thrown or to the bus by specifically politicians because after all they were merely implementing the rules that those politicians had themselves voted for. and ijust feel that parliament has a bad habit of making rules the police must enforce and then blaming the police when that enforcement creates political problems for them. the mayor of london was not happy, he said he wasn't accepting what cressida dick had to say, kezia initially and it was the leader of the lib dems who called for her to resign. as the report said, after looking at a lot of evidence and is

speaking to a lot of people and looking at social media, the first snapshot view that all of us saw perhaps were people being arrested was not press the true story. weill. was not press the true story. well, i still think— was not press the true story. well, i still think is _ was not press the true story. well, i still think is a _ was not press the true story. well, i still think is a debatable - was not press the true story. well, i still think is a debatable point. i i still think is a debatable point. the question isjust how interdependent is this review? some people _ interdependent is this review? some people described as an independent review_ people described as an independent review but others describe it as a police _ review but others describe it as a police inspectorate but the issue is the fact— police inspectorate but the issue is the fact that that image of the woman— the fact that that image of the woman on the ground being held down by police _ woman on the ground being held down by police officers spoke to a wider issue _ by police officers spoke to a wider issue of— by police officers spoke to a wider issue ofjust the clapham common that night— issue ofjust the clapham common that night to make you see the image on the _ that night to make you see the image on the streets and it spoke to women being _ on the streets and it spoke to women being held _ on the streets and it spoke to women being held down by police officers and speaking to a much wider issue then policing that night. but the report— then policing that night. but the report exonerates the police, the strongest — report exonerates the police, the strongest criticism was that the communication between police could've — communication between police could've been better than it was, but it— could've been better than it was, but it helps cressida dick no doubt about _ but it helps cressida dick no doubt about that — but it helps cressida dick no doubt about that. but but it helps cressida dick no doubt about that. �* ., ,.,

but it helps cressida dick no doubt about that. �* ., , ., ., about that. but it also brought out toda that about that. but it also brought out today that they — about that. but it also brought out today that they didn't _ about that. but it also brought out today that they didn't know - about that. but it also brought out today that they didn't know the . today that they didn't know the duchess of cambridge was visiting, the first they saw that was on another channel. it the first they saw that was on another channel.— another channel. it is not completely _ another channel. it is not completely fair _ another channel. it is not completely fair criticism l another channel. it is not i completely fair criticism but another channel. it is not - completely fair criticism but if your— completely fair criticism but if your head of the metropolitan police. — your head of the metropolitan police, you will feel exonerated reading — police, you will feel exonerated reading in— police, you will feel exonerated reading in the way it is being exonerated. is reading in the way it is being exonerated.— reading in the way it is being exonerated. is that your view madal n exonerated. is that your view madalyn or — exonerated. is that your view madalyn or do _ exonerated. is that your view madalyn or do you _ exonerated. is that your view madalyn or do you think- exonerated. is that your view madalyn or do you think it. exonerated. is that your view l madalyn or do you think it goes further present because reclaim the streets will not be happy with this. of course not, and i think kezia is absolutely right that these pictures and videos and the sense of anger thatis and videos and the sense of anger that is felt to the population is quite justifiably based on what they saw, that is not going away anytime soon. it isjust saw, that is not going away anytime soon. it is just that was one snapshot of the protest. and yet there has also been pretty terrible abuse reported towards the police as well and it's clear they were in a very difficult position. i think this gives a more nuanced picture for us i don't think the questions will be entirely answered by this but i think itjust shows that an

ounce of context snapshot that we see on social media doesn't quite provide the full story. should be auoin to provide the full story. should be going to the _ provide the full story. should be going to the telegraph, - provide the full story. should be going to the telegraph, kezia? | going to the telegraph, kezia? merkel and mccrone turn to put in for vaccines was ofjust the latest twist in the oxford/astrazeneca vaccine saga with europe. —— merkel and macron for us to bring up or of the speed who have not been following this story thus far. it is a saua following this story thus far. it is a saga but _ following this story thus far. it is a saga but the — following this story thus far. it is a saga but the astrazeneca vaccine but also _ a saga but the astrazeneca vaccine but also a — a saga but the astrazeneca vaccine but also a saga but the eu's roll-out _ but also a saga but the eu's roll—out of the vaccine with the leaders — roll—out of the vaccine with the leaders of _ roll—out of the vaccine with the leaders of both france and germany having _ leaders of both france and germany having a _ leaders of both france and germany having a stop start attitude to the roll-out _ having a stop start attitude to the roll-out of — having a stop start attitude to the roll—out of vaccinations across europe — roll—out of vaccinations across europe and now turning to russia for help _ europe and now turning to russia for help it _ europe and now turning to russia for help. it looks like the russians might— help. it looks like the russians might have a new vaccine called sputnik— might have a new vaccine called sputnik still to be approved by the medical— sputnik still to be approved by the medical regulators but if it were to be approved it could dramatically increase — be approved it could dramatically increase supply across europe. forgive — increase supply across europe. forgive me, it has already been rolled out to other countries but it has not had the final approval which makes it even more interesting that

perhaps europe should be approaching them for that now.— them for that now. there's an exoectation — them for that now. there's an expectation that _ them for that now. there's an expectation that the - them for that now. there's an | expectation that the european regulators will approve it and that's— regulators will approve it and that's why these conversations are taking _ that's why these conversations are taking place but if it were to be approved — taking place but if it were to be approved it gets the leaders of france — approved it gets the leaders of france and germany out of a bit of a pickle _ france and germany out of a bit of a pickle because they have not been giving _ pickle because they have not been giving the — pickle because they have not been giving the oxford/astrazeneca vaccine — giving the oxford/astrazeneca vaccine to people under the age of 55... _ vaccine to people under the age of 55... in _ vaccine to people under the age of 55... in germany there were several incidences _ 55... in germany there were several incidences of — 55... in germany there were several incidences of women in particular having _ incidences of women in particular having clots after receiving the vaccination leading to nine debts and angela merkel cannot ignore this evidence _ and angela merkel cannot ignore this evidence. it has led to matt hancock in the _ evidence. it has led to matt hancock in the uk _ evidence. it has led to matt hancock in the uk -- — evidence. it has led to matt hancock in the uk —— uk reiterating how safe the astrazeneca vaccine is and we have _ the astrazeneca vaccine is and we have to _ the astrazeneca vaccine is and we have to remember that it isn't safe and approved for roll—out here in the united — and approved for roll—out here in the united kingdom. it adds to the sense _ the united kingdom. it adds to the sense of— the united kingdom. it adds to the sense of the growing stop start with the vaccine — sense of the growing stop start with the vaccine robot in europe not helping — the vaccine robot in europe not helping anyone. —— nine deaths. the helping anyone. -- nine deaths. the paers helping anyone. —— nine deaths. tue: papers pointing out helping anyone. —— nine deaths. ti9: papers pointing out how helping anyone. —— nine deaths. ti9 papers pointing out how this could affect the global coalition against

russia for sanctions for a grievous incidences in crimea and attempted assassinations and etc. it incidences in crimea and attempted assassinations and etc.— assassinations and etc. it has chance assassinations and etc. it has change the — assassinations and etc. it has change the leverage - assassinations and etc. it has change the leverage it - change the leverage it significantly, the time in russia did not have a great deal of reference to go on and the international community was united against russia. —— deal of leverage. i say that but germany has been warming to russia in all sorts of areas but in general the international community has been pretty anti—russian which changes the dynamics it's an interesting issue because kezia is quite right to highlight that they have noticed in some cases in specific demographics in young women in particular. but it is more complicated than that because i suppose the crucial question is the vaccine doing more harm than good and it may be for some specific groups who have themselves very little risk of catching or having serious complication, and might be better off to wait for a different

vaccine. but if that is communicated by european leaders have the effects of scaring off other demographics which it might well, then the risks of that communication could be greater to the population as a whole. i think we have seen a lot during the pandemic that it is easy to get people scared about something and quite difficult to un—scare them. and quite difficult to un-scare them. : :, , , :, them. and we have been here several times before. — them. and we have been here several times before, just _ them. and we have been here several times before, just on _ them. and we have been here several times before, just on that _ them. and we have been here several times before, just on that point - them. and we have been here several times before, just on that point to - times before, just on that point to madalyn and kezia as well, it is a strange that none of the trials and regulatory bodies in this country have picked up on any of this. that is what is such a disconnect because without disputing any of the trials carried out elsewhere, it is just not that we have not picked up the same things. it is not that we have not picked up the same things-— same things. it is absolutely bizarre. we _ same things. it is absolutely bizarre. we have _ same things. it is absolutely bizarre. we have not - same things. it is absolutely bizarre. we have not heard i same things. it is absolutely i bizarre. we have not heard this happening on a grand scale (and where the oxford/astrazeneca vaccine is now the more predominant version being used, there was a study that looked at the recipients of both the

pfizer and astrazeneca vaccines in wales and did not find a single example of blood clotting cases. it is worth looking into but i suppose we have to be very careful if you imply there is a causal connection between us on the because they come —— because the consequence of the application can be very serious... should we go into the y because this is talking about the uk warning vaccine... what is he warning? brute vaccine... what is he warning? we exce -t in vaccine... what is he warning? we except in the united kingdom that the vaccine road has been one of the limited _ the vaccine road has been one of the limited successes of the government throughout the pandemic not least because _ throughout the pandemic not least because they have been able to secure — because they have been able to secure so — because they have been able to secure so many fax occasions where ahead _ secure so many fax occasions where ahead of— secure so many fax occasions where ahead of other countries —— vaccination. the manufacturing of these _ vaccination. the manufacturing of these vaccinations tend to not be in these vaccinations tend to not be in the united — these vaccinations tend to not be in the united kingdom and we have to inrport— the united kingdom and we have to import them and one of the leading scientists— import them and one of the leading scientists from oxford behind this vaccine _ scientists from oxford behind this vaccine is — scientists from oxford behind this vaccine is warning there is a big problem — vaccine is warning there is a big problem developing in the uk because we don't _ problem developing in the uk because we don't have the manufacturing

capacity— we don't have the manufacturing capacity here to make the vaccines where _ capacity here to make the vaccines where we — capacity here to make the vaccines where we are relying on other countries _ where we are relying on other countries to do that. he is going on the uk _ countries to do that. he is going on the uk government to invest heavily on that— the uk government to invest heavily on that manufacturing capacity here and united — on that manufacturing capacity here and united kingdom. find on that manufacturing capacity here and united kingdom.— and united kingdom. and is despite the nova vexed _ and united kingdom. and is despite the nova vexed deal— and united kingdom. and is despite the nova vexed deal which - and united kingdom. and is despite the nova vexed deal which is - and united kingdom. and is despite the nova vexed deal which is quite l and united kingdom. and is despitej the nova vexed deal which is quite a significant quantity, isn't it? that is riaht significant quantity, isn't it? that is right and _ significant quantity, isn't it? that is right and i— significant quantity, isn't it? that is right and i think _ significant quantity, isn't it? trust is right and i think this is all another reminder i think of how some of the logic of i suppose market economics, the assumption people make about these things have actually been rather confounded by the way that countries operate cometh at the top priority is safeguarding their own citizens. and we find the global supply chains that houses safe practices, events can change quickly and having things being done in—house with those capabilities, it is very important and that was one of the big wins of our own roll—out that there were

people inside government you understood it was important to have uk —based manufacturers and so on. yes and that is before this idea which your paper published today of a global coalition, a treaty to prevent isolationism, nationalism, and vaccine nationalism as well. do you think that will be successful bearing in mind what we see at the moment now? india is now producing vaccines and refusing to export those until they have dealt with those until they have dealt with those in their own population. it feels very much like a 2—stage process — feels very much like a 2—stage process. lots of countries are very focused _ process. lots of countries are very focused on — process. lots of countries are very focused on vaccinating the most vulnerable people and getting the economy moving again but that doesn't — economy moving again but that doesn't mean people can go on an easyjet _ doesn't mean people can go on an easyjet and go on holiday. we will not be _ easyjet and go on holiday. we will not be up — easyjet and go on holiday. we will not be up to do that and to other countries — not be up to do that and to other countries have the same levels of vaccination — countries have the same levels of vaccination as we have here and that's— vaccination as we have here and that's nry— vaccination as we have here and that's my vaccine nationalism in the lon- that's my vaccine nationalism in the long term _ that's my vaccine nationalism in the long term is — that's my vaccine nationalism in the long term is such a dangerous thing. ithink— long term is such a dangerous thing. i think once — long term is such a dangerous thing. i think once the uk government once they get— i think once the uk government once they get the point of getting all they get the point of getting all the pretty groups vaccinated and we

expect _ the pretty groups vaccinated and we expect everyone over the age of 50 to be _ expect everyone over the age of 50 to be vaccinated by the middle of april. _ to be vaccinated by the middle of april. you — to be vaccinated by the middle of april, you may see a more internationalist attitude from the uk governments to share vaccines across— uk governments to share vaccines across the — uk governments to share vaccines across the world. let's move onto something different. in the sun madalyn, a nexus of telling the sun prospectjory dean why he is treating —— quitting social media, why? l why he is treating -- quitting social media, why?— why he is treating -- quitting social media, why? i have not seen the interview— social media, why? i have not seen the interview because _ social media, why? i have not seen the interview because it _ social media, why? i have not seen the interview because it is - social media, why? i have not seen the interview because it is for - social media, why? i have not seen the interview because it is for than | the interview because it is for than the interview because it is for than the paper but he left social media because he felt the social media giants had been reluctant, to reluctant to work meaningfully to tackle online bullying and racism. thierry henry when he first announced he was leaving he made the sensible point which i share very much that it is easy to make an account on twitter, use that to bully and harass people without any kind of consequences. and i really think he had a point there. i spend way too much time on twitter and i also look at the unpleasant things

that people say and it's almost always... t that people say and it's almost alwa s... �* that people say and it's almost alwa s... ., , that people say and it's almost alwa s... ., i, ., always... i can't actually be on twitter always. .. i can't actually be on twitter for— always... i can't actually be on twitter for too _ always... i can't actually be on twitter for too long _ always... i can't actually be on twitter for too long because i always... i can't actually be on twitter for too long because it | always... i can't actually be on i twitter for too long because it is just so depressing and you just feel so contaminated sometimes byjust all the anger out there. but so contaminated sometimes by 'ust all the anger out therei all the anger out there. but it is also horribly _ all the anger out there. but it is also horribly compulsive - all the anger out there. but it is also horribly compulsive and i all the anger out there. but it is | also horribly compulsive and you all the anger out there. but it is - also horribly compulsive and you get into every once in a while a nasty engagement with someone and then suddenly you see a great meme that is enough to counteract it... but i sometimes wonder these anonymous ake people, who are you in the real world? are these normal people who have regularjobs? —— these egg people because i do they live these double wives of being horrible to people they have never met online? this is what i guess thierry henry alluded to would they be quite as bold if it was clear who they were and if there was accountability for it? �* :, , :, :, and if there was accountability for it? �* :, :, , :, it? and four someone as high-profile as thierry henry _ it? and four someone as high-profile as thierry henry to _ it? and four someone as high-profile as thierry henry to susan _ it? and four someone as high-profile as thierry henry to susan at - it? and four someone as high-profile as thierry henry to susan at the - as thierry henry to susan at the summit this will change social attitudes for people who use social media? —— to say... we attitudes for people who use social media? -- to say...— media? -- to say... we have been talkin: a media? -- to say... we have been talking a lot _ media? -- to say... we have been talking a lot about _ media? -- to say... we have been talking a lot about anonymous - media? -- to say... we have been l talking a lot about anonymous abuse and politics turning away people

from _ and politics turning away people from entering political