Skip to main content

tv   The Papers  BBC News  April 12, 2021 10:30pm-10:45pm BST

10:30 pm
of the 19705 labour government, and one of the first women cabinet ministers. mark politics was in her blood. her mother was vera brittain, a famous writer and feminist campaigner. shirley williams joined the labour party in her teens and entered the house of commons in 1964. in a male dominated profession, she was often the only woman on the platform. she rose to a cabinet level when labour returned to power in 1974, and later as education secretary began to replace grammar schools with the comprehensive system. but she and others became disillusioned as the labour party moved to the left. too many have done something which is known as keeping your head down. well, the time has come when you'd better stick your head is up. in 1981, williams dramatically walked away from labour, one of the so—called gang of four who established the sdp,
10:31 pm
promising to break the mould of british politics. she won crosby in a famous by—election. we are making a new beginning for britain. the euphoria was short lived. she lost in the 1983 general election. the sdp—liberal alliance got 25% of the vote but not many seats. today, colleagues suggested she should have had a more prominent role. the view was that if shirley williams and i had been running the �*83 election together we would have done even better than we did. she was just a very, very popular person. much more popular than any of the rest of us. a sometimes acrimonious merger with the liberal party eventually created the liberal democrats. now baroness williams, she held a senior academic posts, but remained active in politics, becoming president of the party. i don't think honestly, i would be an mp without having someone like her to have inspired me. there were so few women who were around at the time. i do think she was the greatest leader our party never had. i actually think she was one of the greatest prime ministers the country never had.
10:32 pm
she was passionately pro—european, using her final speech to the house of lords before retirement to make the against brexit. the case against brexit. think very hard before allowing the united kingdom withdrawal from what i believe to be its major duty to the world, and that is the one it will encounter and deliver through the european union. today, colleagues recalled her wisdom and warmth. shirley was a liberal lion. she was a trailblazer, particularly for women in politics. the liberal democrat family is very sad tonight. shirley williams, who's died at the age of 90. and that's it. now on bbc one, time for the news where you are. have a very good night.
10:33 pm
hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are broadcaster david davies and lucy fisher, deputy political editor at the telegraph. tomorrow's front pages, starting with the photo released by prince william of his son george and the duke of edinburgh is on the front of the telegraph. the paper covers william and harry's tributes to their grandfather. it's the same story on the front of the mirror, which has a picture of the three men in military uniform. the metro points out the contrasting language used by the late duke's grandsons in their statements. the mail says senior royals will be at the queen's side for public events.
10:34 pm
the government are considering to mix and match covid boosterjabs, according to the front page of the i. the investigation launched by the government into lobbying — following the actions of david cameron — is the ft�*s top story. the guardian leads on the same story and also has a picture of the poltician shirley williams, who has died at the age of 90. and the daily star has an image of two very determined pub—goers, as lockdown restrictions eased earlier today. so, let's begin. lucy, let's start with the
10:35 pm
telegraph. william, he wants us to get on with the job. a lovely picture of george next to his great—grandfather. the papers have been contrasting the very different language here but i think some commentators are suggesting that even a slight sting in from the language used but tell us what do you think? figs language used but tell us what do ou think? �* , language used but tell us what do ou think? ~ , i. ., , . ., you think? as you would expect from the future king. _ you think? as you would expect from the future king, the _ you think? as you would expect from the future king, the language - you think? as you would expect from the future king, the language is - the future king, the language is very formal, although he does refer to the duke of edinburgh as his grandpa. and also someone who was still hungry for more royal participant, describing his grandfather as master of the barbecue and legend of banter. it was noticeable the very contrasting styles of the two brothers, but as i see it, very much united and sentiment. both paying tribute to
10:36 pm
the service of prince philip to his great sense of humour, to a sense of adventure that he had and yes, of course there has been a bit of drama in the family before prince philip's death and people are going to analyse those two different statements were released in 30 minutes apart very different in style it does tell us about the questions. style it does tell us about the question— style it does tell us about the cuestions. ,, . , ., , questions. statements from his office, questions. statements from his office. harry — questions. statements from his office, harry came _ questions. statements from his office, harry came from - questions. statements from his office, harry came from his - questions. statements from his i office, harry came from his press secretary which really highlights a different these two brothers are now. what do you read into williams saying he would want us to get on with the job? saying he would want us to get on with thejob? i saying he would want us to get on with the job?— with the “ob? i fear that whatever an bod with the job? i fear that whatever anybody may _ with the job? i fear that whatever anybody may like. _ with the job? i fear that whatever anybody may like, prince - with the job? i fear that whatever anybody may like, prince harry'sl anybody may like, prince harry's presence — anybody may like, prince harry's presence on saturday will inevitably be something of a sideshow. whether people _ be something of a sideshow. whether people like it or not. yes, the
10:37 pm
language _ people like it or not. yes, the language is very different but these are very— language is very different but these are very different people and as lucy— are very different people and as lucy has— are very different people and as lucy has said, they are now in very different_ lucy has said, they are now in very different circumstances and in very different _ different circumstances and in very different parts of the world. so, i sunpose — different parts of the world. so, i sunpose it — different parts of the world. so, i suppose it was to be expected and people _ suppose it was to be expected and people have got to live with it and -et people have got to live with it and get used — people have got to live with it and get used to it. how their personal relationship, william and harry see through— relationship, william and harry see through the next ten days, we wait to see _ through the next ten days, we wait to see but— through the next ten days, we wait to see. but it will be a psychodrama in three _ to see. but it will be a psychodrama in three or— to see. but it will be a psychodrama in three or four or five perhaps. looking — in three or four or five perhaps. looking at _ in three or four or five perhaps. looking at the metro, they have said words apart, commentators, sometimes it's described as a criminologist talking about what is meant by official statements or whatever. but the fact that harry
10:38 pm
used the motto from the marines at the end of his statements where he had taken on the honourific of the general of the marines and had them removed from him by the queen after that year possible separation to see how he was going to go. is that reading too much into it? you can call it a psychodrama but as david says, everyone is going to be looked says, everyone is going to be looking at the body language of these two people when they walk behind their mother's coffin. interesting to see that particular incident and the reported remarks of the duke of edinburgh who persuaded the duke of edinburgh who persuaded the two brothers to walk and he said of course, if i walk, will you walk with me? and that it's such a
10:39 pm
striking image of family unity in the tragedy and walking behind their prince diana poss plus coffin. looking at the body language, yet the words today so far, it has been reported that prince harry was sad to lose his position as an honourary chief of the royal marines and there may be something in that. also in his sensational interview in recent weeks, he described his brother and father is trapped inside the system and i think you see him using such colloquial free language, and i think you see him using such colloquialfree language, again it conjures up that idea that there is a stiffness formality and repression of the royal family that prince spoke about in that interview the
10:40 pm
royal family have this tradition to be completely inscrutable in public. and over the past day or two, since the duke's death, although of the children have come out and really reviewed for more intimate insights into the relationship with their father. �* ., , , ., father. but the reality is that the duke of edinburgh _ father. but the reality is that the duke of edinburgh himself - father. but the reality is that the j duke of edinburgh himself would father. but the reality is that the - duke of edinburgh himself would have absolutely hated all of this. i fear he might— absolutely hated all of this. i fear he might have said privately, i told you this _ he might have said privately, i told you this would happen and he would have been_ you this would happen and he would have been right. but that is the world _ have been right. but that is the world we — have been right. but that is the world we live in and that is the world — world we live in and that is the world that _ world we live in and that is the world that it's harry and their wives— world that it's harry and their wives and _ world that it's harry and their wives and the queen are going to continue — wives and the queen are going to continue to live in and they are going _ continue to live in and they are going to — continue to live in and they are going to have to exist with it and it's going — going to have to exist with it and it's going to be very difficult. moving — it's going to be very difficult. moving on to other subjects. the
10:41 pm
guardian. high streets rush. i have not yet knocked back _ high streets rush. i have not yet knocked back a _ high streets rush. i have not yet knocked back a couple _ high streets rush. i have not yet knocked back a couple of- high streets rush. i have not yet| knocked back a couple of glasses high streets rush. i have not yet i knocked back a couple of glasses of wine, but they intend to tomorrow. is that the new purchase today? he. is that the new purchase today? no, it is not. pulling _ is that the new purchase today? no, it is not. pulling your— is that the new purchase today? no, it is not. pulling your leg. _ is that the new purchase today? no, it is not. pulling your leg. looking i it is not. pulling your leg. looking at tv or it is not. pulling your leg. looking at w or on _ it is not. pulling your leg. looking at w or on the — it is not. pulling your leg. looking at tv or on the pictures, - it is not. pulling your leg. looking at tv or on the pictures, when - it is not. pulling your leg. looking at tv or on the pictures, when i i at tv or on the pictures, when i came to work several hours ago, 0xford came to work several hours ago, oxford street, my goodness. it was like going back for months, quite frankly. like going back for months, quite frankl . ., , like going back for months, quite frankl . ~' , like going back for months, quite frankl. ~' , frankly. likewise if i may say so was the town _ frankly. likewise if i may say so was the town centre. _ frankly. likewise if i may say so was the town centre. the - frankly. likewise if i may say so i was the town centre. the shopping centre _ was the town centre. the shopping centre and — was the town centre. the shopping centre and you know, this is the reality— centre and you know, this is the reality of— centre and you know, this is the reality of today. we are told in some — reality of today. we are told in some areas, in terms of comparison would _ some areas, in terms of comparison would last— some areas, in terms of comparison would last monday, the number of people _ would last monday, the number of people there, 200% up. but the big
10:42 pm
question— people there, 200% up. but the big question surely is when things calm down _ question surely is when things calm down a _ question surely is when things calm down a hit. — question surely is when things calm down a bit, which they will, have things— down a bit, which they will, have things changed, has shopping habits changed _ things changed, has shopping habits changed from pre—pandemic? 0f things changed, has shopping habits changed from pre—pandemic? of the been changed and for me, of course so many— been changed and for me, of course so many stores have gone under and you suspect — so many stores have gone under and you suspect that the days of the traditional big stores as we've known — traditional big stores as we've known them, some of them we have grown _ known them, some of them we have grown up _ known them, some of them we have grown up with, may be behind us, but there _ grown up with, may be behind us, but there is— grown up with, may be behind us, but there is a _ grown up with, may be behind us, but there is a huge opportunity here for there is a huge opportunity here for the smaller— there is a huge opportunity here for the smaller independent stores that may not— the smaller independent stores that may not last a hundred years, but may not last a hundred years, but may last — may not last a hundred years, but may last a — may not last a hundred years, but may last a few years and coming out of fashion _ may last a few years and coming out of fashion. and then of course, the whole _ of fashion. and then of course, the whole issue. — of fashion. and then of course, the whole issue, or the issues of online shopping _ whole issue, or the issues of online shopping and where that is headed. and also— shopping and where that is headed. and also what this means for the pandemic because either the vaccination programme has gone so
10:43 pm
well, was it 15 or 4% so far, herd immunity was 16%. but this may have on the spread of covid—19 and presumably, by the government is built in these fire breaks between the various stages of using the locked on so they can actually gather that scientific data. that's ri . ht. gather that scientific data. that's right- they've — gather that scientific data. that's right. they've been _ gather that scientific data. that's right. they've been analysing - gather that scientific data. that's j right. they've been analysing the situation and their prediction is that what we have seen today, the mixing in outdoor hospitality will have a fairly modest impact on the spread of covid—19, but you're absolutely right and scientists will be looking very carefully for any sign of a major uptick that, and uptick in hospitals and depths and so far, it is looking good i think that's also why we have seen industry groups asking the government and local authorities to be lenient in the enforcement of the
10:44 pm
rules around cues putting up on the streets in pubs and restaurants in central london and also thirsty londoners queuing up for their first paints with friends and because there will be bottlenecks with people on doors having to check nhs test and trace on mobile phones, it will be for people to be processed in pubs to get their drinks and so, given the threat of the ultra mixing spread of the viruses into bed, people should be lenient. in pubs face fines in a crackdown on queuing. this is guidance. not the law, but the pubs are expected to manage outside queuing so they do not cause a risk of the virus spreading. it is a bit heavy—handed, isn't it? spreading. it is a bit heavy-handed, isn't it? ., .., . spreading. it is a bit heavy-handed, isn't it? ., . _ ., , isn't it? there are council bylaws and the question _
10:45 pm
isn't it? there are council bylaws and the question that _ isn't it? there are council bylaws and the question that a - isn't it? there are council bylaws and the question that a lot - isn't it? there are council bylaws and the question that a lot of. and the question that a lot of people — and the question that a lot of people ask is who is actually going to do— people ask is who is actually going to do all— people ask is who is actually going to do all of— people ask is who is actually going to do all of this enforcement and if the cues— to do all of this enforcement and if the cues build up? another areal was quite — the cues build up? another areal was quite taken with today was the number— was quite taken with today was the number of— was quite taken with today was the number of queues outside of hairdressers.— number of queues outside of hairdressers. ,., ., , hairdressers. david, we temporarily lost ou. hairdressers. david, we temporarily lost you- go — hairdressers. david, we temporarily lost you- go on- _ hairdressers. david, we temporarily lost you. go on. we've _ hairdressers. david, we temporarily lost you. go on. we've got - hairdressers. david, we temporarily lost you. go on. we've got you - hairdressers. david, we temporarily| lost you. go on. we've got you back. is talking about hairdressers, i was saying _ is talking about hairdressers, i was saying that — is talking about hairdressers, i was saying that the issues surrounding the cues— saying that the issues surrounding the cues outside hairdressers, which i the cues outside hairdressers, which i had _ the cues outside hairdressers, which i had never— the cues outside hairdressers, which i had never seen before and maybe i'm i had never seen before and maybe i'm not— i had never seen before and maybe i'm not the — i had never seen before and maybe i'm not the right person to ask about— i'm not the right person to ask about cues outside of hairdressers but they— about cues outside of hairdressers but they were quite remarkable and i waited _ but they were quite remarkable and i waited to _ but they were quite remarkable and i waited to see how the future for hairdressers.— neatly on to this. my hairdressers
10:46 pm
cannot fit me in. do you think david

28 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on