the palestinian group, hamas says it has fired more than 130 rockets towards the israeli city of tel aviv and its suburbs. a woman is reported to have been killed in the barrage. meanwhile dozens of people are reported to have died in israeli air raids on gaza. one attack led to this high—rise building collapsing — people inside had earlier been told to evacuate. seven school children and two adults have been killed in a shooting at a school in the russian city of kazan. security forces stormed the school and detained the suspected attacker — a nineteen year old former pupil. manchester city have won the premier league title — after their only remaining challengers, manchester united, lost to leicester. it's city's third title in four seasons. and that is the headlines on a bbc world news.

hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are former fleet street editor, eve pollard and anand menon, director of the uk in a changing europe. it think tank which is a lot of negotiation on the brexit. i'm sure he has a lot of other things on his plate these days. let me bring you up—to—date on the front pages let me bring you up—to—date on the front pages queen back in the office at 95... the front page of the metro shows queen elizabeth ii in the house of lords at the opening of parliament. she set out more than 25 bills in her speech, her 67. she set up more than 25 speeches. she set up more than 25 speeches.

her first official appearance in public since the death of her husband prince philip last month. one of these new bills is detailed on the front page of tomorrow's times. the paper reports that student unions will be legally obliged to protect freedrom of speech and could be taken to court by so—called �*cancelled' speakers. those were denied the opportunity to speak after they had been booked. those were denied the opportunity to speak after they had been booked. when will they show they care? — the daily mail highlights the lack of detail in the queen's speech about future social care funding plans. reporting that borisjohnson devoted just nine words to social care. but he said when he first took office more than 18 months ago that he had a planned ready—made to rollout. he had a planned ready—made to rollout. on the guardian's front page, warnings about another of the new bills — planned legislation to make photo id compulsory for elections. the paper reports that two million people don't have the required id so would be unable to vote. on the front page of

the telegraph, black smoke in the skies above gaza — the paper reports that israel bombed palestinian areas and hamas returned fire with more than 100 rockets, as clashes between the two sides escalated. the independent leads on the latest developments in the greensill inquiry — as it's revealed that former prime minister david cameron sent dozens of texts lobbying for greensill capital. and there's more on this from the i, reporting that mr cameron sent 47 messages to ministers and officials trying to get treasury funding for greensill — a finance firm that employed him. do you want to kick off on this one was social care? that's on the front of the mail. it's fair to say that this is a particular bullet that for whatever reason a succession of governments have dodge. it's almost

one that none of the parties can hold their head up with pride about. labor. sheet, the liberal deborah and conservatives dodged it and the conservative have dodged it until now. but is this promise written in the paperwork the paper in which the queen wrote it even if the paper was part to make?— queen wrote it even if the paper was art to make? ~ part to make? well, he has committed himself, the — part to make? well, he has committed himself, the prime _ part to make? well, he has committed himself, the prime minister— part to make? well, he has committed himself, the prime minister in - himself, the prime minister in parliament to bring forward legislation. i should say perhaps the most current thing over the last two years of the experience of the conservatives in the 2017 election when teresa may put forward some quite radical proposals for social care in the conservative manifesto. and they were forced to do a humiliating u—turn. ithink and they were forced to do a humiliating u—turn. i think that having made government any keener to grasp this particular metal. that mirror has been running a long campaign to the cost of dementia care. they are on as his front page shows absolutely furious. perhaps the government will be slightly concerned that quite a few prominent

mps have come out and said they are quite disappointed by the lack of legislation on social care. the conservatives _ legislation on social care. the conservatives did _ legislation on social care. the conservatives did try, got their fingers in the 2017 campaign and then rewrote the plans and then didn't do anything na and at that point. labourto didn't do anything na and at that point. labour to get its fingers burnt when he tried to do a cross party deal on this and conservatives said it was going to be a death tax and then everybody ran away from it. is this one of those things that we will keep talking about and just keep putting off do think? i will keep talking about and 'ust keep putting off do think? i hope not. it is keep putting off do think? i hope not- it is in _ keep putting off do think? i hope not. it is in an _ keep putting off do think? i hope not. it is in an enormous - keep putting off do think? i hope | not. it is in an enormous problem. it will_ not. it is in an enormous problem. it will be _ not. it is in an enormous problem. it will be very— not. it is in an enormous problem. it will be very expensive. it's very interesting — it will be very expensive. it's very interesting that dimension always comes_ interesting that dimension always comes up — interesting that dimension always comes up. it did in the 2017 election _ comes up. it did in the 2017 election. it's come up in this piece lodax _ election. it's come up in this piece today i'll — election. it's come up in this piece today. i'd ratheradmire election. it's come up in this piece today. i'd rather admire the daily mail because it's attacking the government that is supposed to be supporting. i think all paper should do this _ supporting. i think all paper should do this if— supporting. i think all paper should do this. if you think your party is not doing — do this. if you think your party is not doing what they should be it's

quite _ not doing what they should be it's quite refreshing a paper having a go at the _ quite refreshing a paper having a go at the party they normally are for. but dementia comes up all the time. and it's _ but dementia comes up all the time. and it's partly because sadly, often people _ and it's partly because sadly, often people with dementia and get it relatively young. and so the treatment and daycare is going to take a _ treatment and daycare is going to take a long time. also sadly we are still at _ take a long time. also sadly we are still at the — take a long time. also sadly we are still at the very edges are trying to get— still at the very edges are trying to get any— still at the very edges are trying to get any proper treatment and improvement in people who have dementia — improvement in people who have dementia cases. there is an enormous amount— dementia cases. there is an enormous amount of— dementia cases. there is an enormous amount of science going on trying to find out _ amount of science going on trying to find out how you get it, what you -et find out how you get it, what you get it. _ find out how you get it, what you get it. who — find out how you get it, what you get it, who gets it and all the rest of it _ get it, who gets it and all the rest of it but — get it, who gets it and all the rest of it but of— get it, who gets it and all the rest of it. but of course, at some stage possibly— of it. but of course, at some stage possibly after we've paid some of the debt— possibly after we've paid some of the debt that's been caused by covid-i9~ — the debt that's been caused by covid—19. it will have to be dressed _ covid—19. it will have to be grassed. people willjust —— grasped _ grassed. people willjust —— grasped. it is sort of a death tax in a way— grasped. it is sort of a death tax in a way for— grasped. it is sort of a death tax in a way for the people can't look after— in a way for the people can't look after their— in a way for the people can't look after their families properly. unless — after their families properly. unless they know what to plan for her. unless they know what to plan for her~ i_ unless they know what to plan for her~ ithink— unless they know what to plan for her. i think we will come back to this but— her. i think we will come back to this but how soon i'm not sure. the

front of the — this but how soon i'm not sure. tue: front of the guardian this but how soon i'm not sure. tte: front of the guardian warning this but how soon i'm not sure. tt2 front of the guardian warning it johnson's idea or risk freezing out over 2 million voters. in the last paper reviewed my surprise people there are that many people without photo id. i suppose we haven't had identity cards in this country. presumably that is a big difference in terms of our attitude to carrying something to prove that we are who we say we are. flat something to prove that we are who we say we are-— something to prove that we are who we say we are. not only have we not had identity — we say we are. not only have we not had identity cards _ we say we are. not only have we not had identity cards in _ we say we are. not only have we not had identity cards in this _ we say we are. not only have we not had identity cards in this country - had identity cards in this country but a _ had identity cards in this country but a number of members of the parliamentary conservative party not least the _ parliamentary conservative party not least the prime minister himself has spoken— least the prime minister himself has spoken out very passionately against any kind _ spoken out very passionately against any kind of— spoken out very passionately against any kind of identity card. but this is a plan — any kind of identity card. but this is a plan to— any kind of identity card. but this is a plan to make people show photo id is a plan to make people show photo it) when— is a plan to make people show photo id when they go and vote. the guardian— id when they go and vote. the guardian here are quoting the cabinet — guardian here are quoting the cabinet offices own figures that reckon— cabinet offices own figures that reckon there is about 2 million people — reckon there is about 2 million people mainly elderly, disabled and homeless _ people mainly elderly, disabled and homeless people who might lack photo id homeless people who might lack photo it) now _ homeless people who might lack photo id now. therefore face the danger of being _ id now. therefore face the danger of being effectively disenfranchised.

that is _ being effectively disenfranchised. that is a — being effectively disenfranchised. that is a serious worry. any rule that's designed to deal with fraud. because the evidence of electoral fraud in this country is pretty thin. you mentioned last hour the case that made that case so extraordinary it was so unusual. t extraordinary it was so unusual. i agree. i think that it's an interesting point of view. i think frankly people should be, i remember this is r. people were helped, people who were disabled, people who couldn't get to the polling booths were held either by postal parties or by local authorities or by friends and neighbours to get to vote. that's one of the greatjoys about living in this country. you have the right to vote if you live here. i think they should be all be helped to get the right. after all were all going to have covid... and to give their order they hopefully are been vaccinated. i think they should be given the help to help

them. i think so but he should say to them and how do you get to the polling station and can we help you with that? all parties, all sorts should be helped to vote. the front ofthe should be helped to vote. the front of the times. _ should be helped to vote. the front of the times, we _ should be helped to vote. the front of the times, we didn't _ should be helped to vote. the front of the times, we didn't have - should be helped to vote. the front of the times, we didn't have the - of the times, we didn't have the times in the last review we now have the front page at least of the first edition. this is one i suspect will be of particular interest to academics who work in universities. this question of protecting free speech. sorry anna. anna, carry on. this is a proposed law and the queen speech— this is a proposed law and the queen speech to _ this is a proposed law and the queen speech to legislating this week to allow— speech to legislating this week to allow people to claim back and to see you _ allow people to claim back and to see you in — allow people to claim back and to see you in the event that there are language _ see you in the event that there are language and cancelable to people who are _ language and cancelable to people who are invited that was subsequently no platform like going to be giving a form of legal redress _ to be giving a form of legal redress. what university say is this is a solution — redress. what university say is this is a solution to a nonproblem. it

happens — is a solution to a nonproblem. it happens very rarely indeed. and it will simply— happens very rarely indeed. and it will simply make life more complicated by adding another layer of bureaucracy. it is probably part of bureaucracy. it is probably part of what _ of bureaucracy. it is probably part of what people like to refer to as the ongoing culture war. in the sense — the ongoing culture war. in the sense that this is the government signalling — sense that this is the government signalling that universities will have _ signalling that universities will have the — signalling that universities will have the right to simply make platform — have the right to simply make platform of people they disagree with _ platform of people they disagree with. we — platform of people they disagree with. ~ �* ., ., , with. we didn't have it in the last review. which _ with. we didn't have it in the last review. which is _ with. we didn't have it in the last review. which is a _ with. we didn't have it in the last review. which is a chance - with. we didn't have it in the last| review. which is a chance perhaps for us to expand the number of stories we can reflect on. what do you think about this eve? i was struck particularly about one of the other coverage of this. one of the other coverage of this. one of the other papers that made the point that the ministers were talking about potential compensation for at least a route to compensation for those speakers who are no platform to. that could raise an interesting question if you had for example the leader of what might broadly be turned in extremist organisation or somebody who supported the use of violence improved suit of political ends. quite awkward that the government would find legislation

the right to receive a few hundred quid or a few thousand quid for the institution that had cancelled them at that already been invited. buti at that already been invited. but i think many _ at that already been invited. but i think many of— at that already been invited. but i think many of those _ at that already been invited. pit i think many of those organisations i mean, people who are trying to whip up mean, people who are trying to whip up violence, there are already laws dealing with them. i think there is a cancelled culture. i think there are all sorts of people who could now not get into a debating union, into a group and speak to students on all sorts of things. i think there is definitely a cancel culture where there are campuses where what the universities do now, i love the fact that universities talk about too much bureaucracies universities are now full of bureaucracies it seems to me. when i talk to my grandchildren about going into them. i think that there is a cancel culture. there is a woke culture, as things that shouldn't be discussed, things that shouldn't be discussed, things that shouldn't be discussed, things that are unfashionable. what

used to happen is all sorts of people were asked to debate. even people were asked to debate. even people with horrid views, awful views but they were allowed to speak to university students particularly it was supposed to be learning how to deal with some of the worst elements in politics. now there is either a safety first which is what a university state just because they can't deal with the problem. orjust people are quietly and platform. certain women talking about women's education have been on platforms in certain universities. all sorts of things go on. and i think that's when we live in a democracy you should be able to say what you think. and you should be able to debate it and doing that in a proper debating chamber where there is no violence, everybody gets a turn, everybody can listen and possibly vote at the end. and i think we have

to stop this thing about certain things can't be discussed because it's just not on. you should be able to discuss almost anything. it'sjust not on. you should be able to discuss almost anything.- it'sjust not on. you should be able to discuss almost anything. okay. i dare say we — to discuss almost anything. okay. i dare say we can — to discuss almost anything. okay. i dare say we can do _ to discuss almost anything. okay. i dare say we can do that _ to discuss almost anything. okay. i dare say we can do that here. - to discuss almost anything. okay. i dare say we can do that here. let'sj dare say we can do that here. let's talk about the right to discuss things, the right orfreedom of information online. this is the telegraph story about legislation from the government. it says it's going to be the most far—reaching legislation in the world on this question of controlling what is placed on internet platforms. how is this going to work? i placed on internet platforms. how is this going to work?— this going to work? i don't think ou're this going to work? i don't think you're clear _ this going to work? i don't think you're clear about _ this going to work? i don't think you're clear about the _ this going to work? i don't think you're clear about the details. l this going to work? i don't think i you're clear about the details. the broad _ you're clear about the details. the broad outline is the government wants— broad outline is the government wants to — broad outline is the government wants to legislate to make sure that these _ wants to legislate to make sure that these online platforms live up to their— these online platforms live up to their duty— these online platforms live up to their duty of care. the tickly children— their duty of care. the tickly children but they also talk about getting — children but they also talk about getting rid of racist, misogynistic and anti—semitic abuse online. in holding _ and anti—semitic abuse online. in holding these companies to account with a _ holding these companies to account with a threat of eye watering finds. millions _

with a threat of eye watering finds. millions and millions of pounds. the devil is _ millions and millions of pounds. the devil is going to be in the details of how— devil is going to be in the details of how you — devil is going to be in the details of how you define these terms and what measures you try and take to police _ what measures you try and take to police what — what measures you try and take to police what goes on online. that's always _ police what goes on online. that's always been the problem. at least as it said _ always been the problem. at least as it said it— always been the problem. at least as it said it looks to me as if the government is taking very sensible steps _ government is taking very sensible steps to— government is taking very sensible steps to deal with what is often very unpleasant content on line that these _ very unpleasant content on line that these companies are far, far too slow— these companies are far, far too slow to — these companies are far, far too slow to remove.— these companies are far, far too slow to remove. let's move on from that specific — slow to remove. let's move on from that specific story _ slow to remove. let's move on from that specific story to _ slow to remove. let's move on from that specific story to another - that specific story to another problem that arguably is one that is not going to be solved by legislation. on the front of the guardian. the case of the bella murphy ten. these are the people who were killed in 1971. theirfamilies have been campaigning to have their names cleared. effectively they were killed because of an army operation to deal with people it was seeking to deal with people it was seeking to intern. in other words detained because they were thought to be actively involved with the ria. the car has now said that all ten were innocent. , ,., ., , .

car has now said that all ten were innocent. , ., , . innocent. yes. going on since 1971. very extraordinary _ innocent. yes. going on since 1971. very extraordinary that _ innocent. yes. going on since 1971. very extraordinary that no - innocent. yes. going on since 1971. | very extraordinary that no corridors came out before but it's come out today. and you can see the relatives of those people killed on the date really feel that they have had justice. what is extraordinary, if you were young you just don't get this. northern ireland anti—problems that were going on in northern ireland and sinn fein and the protestants in the battles that went on seem to be in another world. it was only 1971. and feelings there run very high. how this helps the situation, how you can close it down without people feeling their rights have not been looked at, their uncle, theirfather who have not been looked at, their uncle, their father who ever? have not been looked at, their uncle, theirfather who ever? we continue to prosecute soldiers who were in northern ireland for doing what they thought was their duty. and here are some innocent people who got shotjust because they were in the wrong place at the wrong

time. it's no way to run a piece is it? itjust keeps sticking needles into the problem. i don't know, i think there's got to be a coming together. there's got to be a sort of hat. of course it was a good friday agreement but it was never followed up on the ground with people seeking to get on. i'm sure all over ireland people are seeking to get on with their neighbors. neighbours that they didn't perhaps choose to get on it. but nothings been done officially.— choose to get on it. but nothings been done officially. maybe the plan is now to do — been done officially. maybe the plan is now to do it. _ been done officially. maybe the plan is now to do it. interesting - been done officially. maybe the plan is now to do it. interesting thoughtl is now to do it. interesting thought to pose there. can we look at the front of the fte? this is the appearance by lex greensill. you don't get many lapses do you? like a name affection, lex. i can't help but think of lex luther because i think it's unfair because i think is a comic book villain. lex greensill gave a rather polished performance

before the treasury select committee. he was a witness in the demise of his own company. what do you make of the coverage focusing as ever it seems to much on lex greensill but on david cameron? the coveraue is greensill but on david cameron? the coverage is interesting. as you say lex greensill gave evidence himself today~ _ lex greensill gave evidence himself today in— lex greensill gave evidence himself today. in the face of some very hostile — today. in the face of some very hostile questioning. about his company— hostile questioning. about his company and his own behavior. he did -ive company and his own behavior. he did give a _ company and his own behavior. he did give a pretty— company and his own behavior. he did give a pretty good performance. at the same _ give a pretty good performance. at the same time as the treasury select committee _ the same time as the treasury select committee dumped all this information including david cameron's information with various ministers _ cameron's information with various ministers it— cameron's information with various ministers it also pointed out that the financial conduct authority is now looking into the collapse of the group _ now looking into the collapse of the group which could herald more trouble — group which could herald more trouble for it mr greensill ahead. the focus — trouble for it mr greensill ahead. the focus on mr cameron. more remarkable messages over and over again— remarkable messages over and over again to _ remarkable messages over and over again to ministers remember at the time grappling with the start of the pandemic— time grappling with the start of the pandemic that they were bombarded with texts— pandemic that they were bombarded with texts and whatsapp messages by a former— with texts and whatsapp messages by a former prime minister basically trying _ a former prime minister basically trying to— a former prime minister basically trying to drum up business for a

firm _ trying to drum up business for a firm from — trying to drum up business for a firm from whose location he stood to -ain firm from whose location he stood to gain a _ firm from whose location he stood to gain a lot _ firm from whose location he stood to gain a lot of — firm from whose location he stood to gain a lot of money. at a minimum it'sjust _ gain a lot of money. at a minimum it'sjust not — gain a lot of money. at a minimum it's just not a — gain a lot of money. at a minimum it's just not a very good luck. let's — it's just not a very good luck. let's end _ it's just not a very good luck. let's end on the telegraph. this intriguing story about the relationship between the sub—sixes and procter & gamble, the consumer goods giant. who apparently meghan markel as she was then it was at the tender age of 11.— tender age of 11. apparently she saw in ad for a proctor— tender age of 11. apparently she saw in ad for a proctor in _ tender age of 11. apparently she saw in ad for a proctor in gamble - in ad for a proctor in gamble washing powder or washing up thing. and the advert said women all over america are fighting greasy pots and pans. and she wrote to them and they change women to people. quite right, shouldn't the men of america... obviously a very early success gave her the gumption to become the woman she is today. what is interesting this is apparently part of our 12 not—for—profit organisation. they are going to hope to help adolescent

women feel that their experiences, their lives are being reflected in their lives are being reflected in the many products that procter & gamble cell. everyday products that we all use. and i gather they've also got in association with the company procter & gamble helped in brazil which also talks to boys about not being violent and behaving properly towards women. it's quite interesting that they are trying to do this not—for—profit start. you've heard about the millions from netflix, the millions from sparta five. what is interesting is they seem to have finally taken root in the usa. i don't suppose they're ever going to come back. in any official roll away. but that's probably healthy and good. dare official roll away. but that's probably healthy and good. are you leased to probably healthy and good. are you pleased to see _ probably healthy and good. are you pleased to see that _ probably healthy and good. are you pleased to see that they _ probably healthy and good. are you pleased to see that they seem - probably healthy and good. are you pleased to see that they seem to i probably healthy and good. are you| pleased to see that they seem to be finding a role in their lives given how things had ended in terms of the royalfamily? i

how things had ended in terms of the royal family?— royal family? i don't think they were ever _ royal family? i don't think they were ever short _ royal family? i don't think they were ever short of— royal family? i don't think they i were ever short of opportunities. royal family? i don't think they - were ever short of opportunities. i was rather— were ever short of opportunities. i was rather cynically thinking was how good — was rather cynically thinking was how good this deal is for procter & gamble _ how good this deal is for procter & gamble. because you know, it makes them _ gamble. because you know, it makes them look— gamble. because you know, it makes them look good to a whole younger generation. when you saw the polling around _ generation. when you saw the polling around the _ generation. when you saw the polling around the fight between harry and the royal— around the fight between harry and the royal family, the younger generation were very much on the side of— generation were very much on the side of this— generation were very much on the side of this couple. and it strikes me that — side of this couple. and it strikes me that this is ingenious by procter & gamble _ me that this is ingenious by procter & gamble to sign up a deal with this couple _ & gamble to sign up a deal with this couple presumably have their name on the website _ couple presumably have their name on the website. more and more companies are trying _ the website. more and more companies are trying to _ the website. more and more companies are trying to do this sort of you know. — are trying to do this sort of you know, charitable work to improve their— know, charitable work to improve their reputations. and this seems to be be _ their reputations. and this seems to be be that— their reputations. and this seems to be be that procter & gamble has signed _ be be that procter & gamble has signed a — be be that procter & gamble has signed a pretty good deal for themselves.— signed a pretty good deal for themselves. . _, �* themselves. and i couldn't save her all the role — themselves. and i couldn't save her all the role appointments _ themselves. and i couldn't save her all the role appointments are - themselves. and i couldn't save her all the role appointments are they? j all the role appointments are they? do you look at the obits? irlat all the role appointments are they? do you look at the obits?— do you look at the obits? not yet but it is coming. _ do you look at the obits? not yet but it is coming. i _ do you look at the obits? not yet but it is coming. i wasn't - do you look at the obits? not yet but it is coming. i wasn't looking| but it is coming. i wasn't looking for our but it is coming. i wasn't looking for your own- — but it is coming. i wasn't looking for your own. worth _ but it is coming. i wasn't looking for your own. worth a _ but it is coming. i wasn't looking for your own. worth a look - but it is coming. i wasn't looking for your own. worth a look at. but it is coming. i wasn't looking| for your own. worth a look at the obits tomorrow because you might see 12 norman lloyd the actor, director,

producer, writer did everything who's died at the age of 106. his acting career lasted 92 years. that's it from the papers. a brief back after the sport and weather. hello, i'm austin halewood with your latest sports news. there's only one place to start tonight because manchester city have been crowned premier league champions. and they did it without even kicking a ball tonight. defeat for manchester united at home to lester means that city cannot be caught. guardiola side when a third title in and four seasons. our correspondent has more. congratulations to pep guardiola and manchester city. the moment that meant disappointment i once had a manchester

and delight on the other. defeat the united meant that city were champions for the fifth time in less than a decade. for their fans another other night to celebrate. it's unbelievable. biggest achievement so far. nothing beats it, primarily, you just know you want the champions of the england. we won the premier let'sj hope we can go to an end to the champions league as well. earlier united's 2—one defeat ended their slender hopes of catching city. whose players can celebrate from the comfort of their armchairs like who said it was unbelievable. while sterling tweeted it's the champions baby on and understandably proud night. we are here where city have played some stunning football this season. of course none of their fans have been able to watch it. every game here has been behind closed doors. but it hasn't stopped their success.

so what's been theire secret? yes, they've headstand out stars like boyer and city fan fell floating but it's their collective strength that's been key. to me it special because even i think it was january, february time when you say deprived her down using maguire go down, there to the best players in the world. but in that time i think city won every single game. i think that says a lot about the collective. and so city's decade of domestic domination has a new chapter. and with a first champions league final to come it could be their greatest yet. it's been some season so far for city. we've just been hearing from their manager, he's been speaking to city tv. so in games everything happen but the league is everyday, every day and we did it incredible. i think is everything start in december and we won

in southampton until 7th of march and we guess lost against united. that period. december and march, we won absolutely everything on the games. and that made us possible. that win for lester tonight at old trafford is a huge boost to their hopes of playing champions league football next year. it also brought an end to manchester united unlikely chance of catching city in the title race. but manager was quick to complement his city rivals. i think the whole season has given us optimism and room for optimism. but also room for improvement. i think we pushed man city all the way until ten, 12 days left of the season. and that's a very good achievement, i think. because they are a very good team. a very worthy champion. i say congratulations because they have played some fantastic stuff this season.

one other game tonight southampton being crystal palace 3—1. both sides knew it would guarantee premier league football next season. palace actually took the league and the first five minutes but southampton drew level thanks to that smart finish from ends. adams then put them in from making a 3—1 with the second goal of the game. and his 12th of the season. meanwhile, we still don't know where the all—english champions league final, between manchester city and chelsea, will take place. earlier today, culture secretary oliver dowden said the government cleared the way for uefa to host the final at wembley. the match will be moved from istanbul, but portugal has emerged as an alternative host. i don't think it would be productive to get into the detail of the discussions going on. we are still discussing it with them. i think given the huge progress that we've made and we've seen just this week at the prime minister is announcing that fans can come back into

stadiums for that was a possible? because of the success of the vaccine but also because we've variance of concern out of the uk. if we can allow this game to happen while protecting the integrity of our quarantine system that of course would love it to happen. the heavyweight fight everyone wants to see. anthonyjoshua against tyson fury looks set to take place in saudi arabia. boxing promoter eddie hearn confirmed the location, with the fight likely to take place on either the 7th or 14th of august. joshua fought in the saudi capital riyadh in december 2019, when he won a rematch against andy ruinr. there's a new race leader at the giro d'italia — and it's an italian rider, alessandro de marchi. came through to lines of qualifying in rome were a bit the spinner and straight sets. but there wasn't much luck forjohanna konta. the british number one beaten

by pemco in the first round in rome. konta not able to put up too much of a fight. she lost 6—3— one injust 69 minutes. and that is all your support for now. just a quick reminder tonight manchester city have been crowned premier league champions. plenty more on the bbc website. for me and the team, have a very good night. hello there. we saw plenty of showers across the country on tuesday. particularly for the midlands, wales and northern england where we had some thunderstorms as well, producing very heavy hailstones like this weather watcher picture shows, in flintshire in north wales. now, for today, it's going to be another one of sunshine and showers, but they shall resume not be quite as intense as what we had on tuesday. but our area of low pressure, which has been sitting on to the west of ireland and the uk for the last few days, will slowly start to fill. weakend as it pushes its way

eastwards across the country. so we will start off again, good deal of sunshine around, but then the showers will start to get going. a bit more cloud, though, for the northern half of scotland. we've seen showery bursts of rain here. and this area of rain in the channel is going to bring some wet weather through the channel islands through the day and start to push northwards into central southern england, southwest england at times. again, temperatures pretty much what they have been the last few days, around the mid—teens celsius for those. a bit colder than that across the northern half of scotland. now, that wet weather across the south pushes further north into parts of wales, the midlands. it could be quite wet through wednesday night across the south. elsewhere, the showers will tend to fade. there will be some clear spells, but also quite a bit of cloud across northern scotland. and again, for most of us, it's going to be another frost free one. so for thursday it could start rather cloudy, quite wet for parts of wales, the midlands into southern england. it will eventually ease away and then it's another one of sunshine and showers, and the odd shower could be on the heavy side again with a rumble of thunder. but a bit more cloud again from the north and east of scotland. temperatures again range from around 1a to 17 degrees, particularly where we have the sunshine, but the cloudy skies

across northern scotland, there it will feel cooler than that. the airflow turns quite slack on friday. we are almost in between weather systems. and it could be friday will be a cloudier day across. that will inhibit the showers that develop. but where we get some sunshine across northern ireland, wales, southern england, this is where we could see some of the showers there developing which could be on the heavy side again. it is here where we will see temperatures reaching around 15 or 16 degrees, otherwise a bit cooler across the board where we have the cloud. so that's how was looking for thursday and friday. if i run the sequence on through the weekend and into the start of next week dominated by low pressure. so we are likely to see spells of rain followed by sunshine and showers. and this temperatures remaining around orjust below the seasonal average. notjust for the weekend, but even as we head throughout much of next week.

this is bbc news — i'm shaun ley with the latest headlines for viewers in the uk and around the world. the moment an israeli airstrike destroys an apartment block in gaza city — residents had been warned to leave. as rockets reach a suburb of tel aviv — benjamin netanhayu says the palestinians will pay a heavy price. some 30 people, israelis and palestinians, have been killed. a teenage gunman in russia opens fire at a school, killing at least seven children and two adults. drivers in the us line up at the pump, fearing the cyber—attack on a vital fuel pipeline could leave them with empty tanks. we've got an audience, we've got dancers, we've got pop stars, we are back! and, no masks, no social distancing — just a negative test is the ticket required

for 4000 people at tonight's brit awards in london.