the sole surviving suspected gunman from the 2015 attacks in paris has appeared in court at the start of a landmark trial. salah abde—slam and 19 others are accused of involvement in the coordinated jihadist attacks that killed 130 people. the former president of afghanistan, ashraf ghani, has released a statement apologising for leaving kabul abruptly as the taliban took power. he said it was the only way to avoid bloodshed in the city. large numbers of women have held another protest in kabul in defiance of the taliban rulers. it comes a day after the taliban announced a new interim government with no female representatives. and emma raducanu's us open dream remains on course. the 18—year—old british qualifier is through to the semifinal at flushing meadows, after yet another straighty sets victory in her quarterfinal against the olympic champion.

hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me is lizzy buchan, political correspondent of the daily mirror, and kieran andrews, political editor of the times scotland. good to have you with us once again. let's look at the front pages that have already come in, bringing you date with these. the financial times, which focuses on tax rises to battle nhs and social care. it reports that borisjohnson fended off a rebellion in the commons to secure the £12 billion tax rise. but the prime minister is warned that isn't enough to fix the care crisis — that's on the front of the guardian. it features warnings from experts and professionals that the "gamble" plan would fail to deliver. staying with the nhs, the telegraph reports the service is hiring 42 new executives

on salaries of up to £270,000 each amid concerns over how new tax cash will be spent. another health story leads on the front of the i, it focuses on rapid roll—out. "boosters to be wrapped up by christmas" as the nhs will work to deliver 35 million jabs by the end of december. "gavin the gaffe" — the metro says the education secretary has "has shot himself in the foot yet again" after he confused footballer marcus rashford with old harrovian rugby player maro itoje. migrants crossing the channel is the main story on the front of the express, as it reports british border force boats will be able to steer migrants back to france. the paper, like several others, also features teenage tennis star emma raducanu, who has reached semi—finals of the us open. so lizzie, do you want to pick us off this evening? starting with the

ft, it's off this evening? starting with the ft, its day two of the story, or you could actually argue it's probably day 3—4 given it was so well trailed over the weekend. but it's quite important, a lot of the stuff in here notjust about the details of parliamentary manoeuvres, but the practicality of how and when this money will be spent.— this money will be spent. that's riaht, it's this money will be spent. that's right. it's not — this money will be spent. that's right, it's not even _ this money will be spent. that's right, it's not even day - this money will be spent. that's right, it's not even day three, . this money will be spent. that's. right, it's not even day three, it's been a saga that's been going on for more than two years. the prime minister said on the steps of downing street when he first became conservative leader back in 2019 saying he had a plan to fix the crisis in social care — two years on, we are right here, and it's carried on over the weekend into today where everyone has had a chance to dig into the details a bit more, because it is quite a complicated plan. this evening, as well, mps voted on in the house of commons and borisjohnson was able to get the resolution through. there

had been a lot of talk about a possible tory rebellion, mps furious, but the rebellion fizzled out, only a few who voted no and 37 who didn't vote either abstaining because they didn't like the proposal or for another reason like they were sick or away. so the prime minister will be relieved to have gotten it through the commons because it is a controversial proposal — it's raising taxes, breaking his manifesto commitment that he wouldn't raise national insurance. and it also includes some of the detail in it, which the papers pick up on about how the money shakes out, how much money is really for the nhs and how much will actually go to social care. just

really for the nhs and how much will actually go to social care.— actually go to social care. just on the question _ actually go to social care. just on the question of— actually go to social care. just on the question of how _ actually go to social care. just on the question of how this - actually go to social care. just on the question of how this funding | the question of how this funding will work, can you give us an idea of how differently the story's being reported in scotland? because there's a number of different elements — you already have free personal care, and you also normally have a situation where government funding from westminster is a block grant, then the locally elected politicians in scottish parliament decide how that money is spent. but this is different, isn't it, the way this is different, isn't it, the way this extra money will be delivered? is different, and you are right, in scotland — is different, and you are right, in scotland it's free personal care for everyone. — scotland it's free personal care for everyone, karen home, which was campaigned by the courier newspaper in dundee _ campaigned by the courier newspaper in dundee who push that through just a couple _ in dundee who push that through just a couple of— in dundee who push that through just a couple of years ago. nicola sturgeon _ a couple of years ago. nicola sturgeon has also been consulting on plans for— sturgeon has also been consulting on plans for care service to push through— plans for care service to push through reforms on social care.

that's_ through reforms on social care. that's in— through reforms on social care. that's in the very early stage, that was in _ that's in the very early stage, that was in her— that's in the very early stage, that was in her programme for government which _ was in her programme for government which was _ was in her programme for government which was unveiled to the scottish parliament on tuesday. but crucially what this _ parliament on tuesday. but crucially what this scottish parliament will receive as — what this scottish parliament will receive as a result of this tax increase _ receive as a result of this tax increase by borisjohnson is an extra _ increase by borisjohnson is an extra ill _ increase by borisjohnson is an extra {1.1 billion a year. the snp particularly, particularly its mps but also — particularly, particularly its mps but also those from scottish government ministers have leveled criticism _ government ministers have leveled criticism that the tax is aggressive. nevertheless, you can really— aggressive. nevertheless, you can really tell— aggressive. nevertheless, you can really tell the difference between the mp5 really tell the difference between the mps in westminster and the snp ministers _ the mps in westminster and the snp ministers who will have the extra 1.1 ministers who will have the extra i~i billion — ministers who will have the extra i~i billion in — ministers who will have the extra 1.1 billion in their budget in terms of the _ 1.1 billion in their budget in terms of the tone — 1.1 billion in their budget in terms of the tone and fury of the criticism _ of the tone and fury of the criticism at the moment. it�*s of the tone and fury of the criticism at the moment. it's a very interesting — criticism at the moment. it's a very interesting contrast. _ criticism at the moment. it's a very interesting contrast. in _ criticism at the moment. it's a very interesting contrast. in terms - criticism at the moment. it's a very

interesting contrast. in terms of. criticism at the moment. it's a very interesting contrast. in terms of - l interesting contrast. in terms of — i want to pick up on something you said, which is a theme in a number of these articles, and that is that a lot of this almost exclusively is about funding and the money. but there isn't any detail on that oven ready plan the minister said he had for the social care bid back in 2019. ., �* , �* , for the social care bid back in 2019. h, ., ., 2019. that's right, he's put forward how he'll raise _ 2019. that's right, he's put forward how he'll raise money _ 2019. that's right, he's put forward how he'll raise money for _ 2019. that's right, he's put forward how he'll raise money for funding, | how he'll raise money for funding, social care and for some of the changes to the way it's paid for. but there's not actually a concrete blueprint for how social care will be reformed. this oven ready plan we were promised is not really emerged, and the government keep saying it will be set out in due course over the period of the autumn. so we haven't really got me on the bones about how this will all work. we've been presented about how it will kind of affect people in terms of

that national insurance rise that everyone, all workers and employees will start paying next april. and we've seen elements of it including an £86,000 cap on lifetime care costs — all these elements are in there, but there's not any detail on starting, how things will be overhauled in the way the care sector is run. so there's a lot of detail lacking which i think the guardian makes the point that the care sector are wanting more information about how this will work. i information about how this will work. .., information about how this will work. .. ., . ,, , , work. i can feel the hackles rising at the daily _ work. i can feel the hackles rising at the daily telegraph _ work. i can feel the hackles rising at the daily telegraph editorial i at the daily telegraph editorial meeting when they saw this news that some of the money will go into the creation of new managerial roles, apparently. perhaps that always explains amongst those who voted

against this measure tonight were two former cabinet ministers. what do you make of this story? this two former cabinet ministers. what do you make of this story?- do you make of this story? this is interesting. _ do you make of this story? this is interesting, the _ do you make of this story? this is interesting, the telegraph - do you make of this story? this is interesting, the telegraph has i interesting, the telegraph has dogged of detail about the health and care bill, which they say some of the money — a large proportion of the money will be raised by these changes to national insurance, which will be £12 billion a year, the government says, a large proportion of tax will go on dealing with the covid backlogs the nhs is suffering. there's also some challenges that the health service is dealing with this and helps recoverfrom the health service is dealing with this and helps recover from the pandemic. the telegraph is picked up this element about how there will be these creations of integrated health boards and these executives... so you can see that's an element of the

disquiet about the fact that this is being touted as a tax rise to pay for social care — actually social care is getting a small amount of money as we see it.— care is getting a small amount of money as we see it. what you make of the sto ? money as we see it. what you make of the story? look. _ money as we see it. what you make of the story? look, it's— money as we see it. what you make of the story? look, it's the _ money as we see it. what you make of the story? look, it's the kind of - the story? look, it's the kind of thing that _ the story? look, it's the kind of thing that the _ the story? look, it's the kind of thing that the uk _ the story? look, it's the kind of thing that the uk government l the story? look, it's the kind of i thing that the uk government will have to _ thing that the uk government will have to get use to this scrutiny of if you _ have to get use to this scrutiny of if you pick— have to get use to this scrutiny of if you pick up taxes if you are a conservative government has decided to hike _ conservative government has decided to hike up _ conservative government has decided to hike up taxes, it's no great surprise — to hike up taxes, it's no great surprise you'll come under pretty intense _ surprise you'll come under pretty intense scrutiny, particularly from those _ intense scrutiny, particularly from those traditionally conservative supporting newspapers who were pretty _ supporting newspapers who were pretty sceptical about this. this great _ pretty sceptical about this. this great worry that this money will be spent _ great worry that this money will be spent and — great worry that this money will be spent and potentially wasted, as some _ spent and potentially wasted, as some people might see it, on middle managementjobs or some people might see it, on middle management jobs or people who are not entirely sure what we do or whether— not entirely sure what we do or whether they are contributing to backlogs — whether they are contributing to backlogs in the nhs to actually

improving care for those people who need it _ improving care for those people who need it. and the best way for the government to address these concerns is to show— government to address these concerns is to show that the new system works and get _ is to show that the new system works and get some early wins including addressing that nhs backlog during the pandemic. there's not a lot of clear— the pandemic. there's not a lot of clear idea — the pandemic. there's not a lot of clear idea as — the pandemic. there's not a lot of clear idea as to how that will be achieved — clear idea as to how that will be achieved. �* . clear idea as to how that will be achieved. �* , ., ., ., ., ., achieved. let's move onto another sto , the achieved. let's move onto another story. the front — achieved. let's move onto another story, the front of _ achieved. let's move onto another story, the front of the _ achieved. let's move onto another story, the front of the daily - story, the front of the daily express, priti patel is apparently getting pretty tough over what the paper describes as french feelings? yes, priti patel has been very frustrated — yes, priti patel has been very frustrated by what she sees as failings — frustrated by what she sees as failings by france to live up to the conditions — failings by france to live up to the conditions that were put on it as part of— conditions that were put on it as part of the — conditions that were put on it as part of the £54 million to try to limit _

part of the £54 million to try to limit the — part of the £54 million to try to limit the number of people who are crossing _ limit the number of people who are crossing the channel in small boats and who _ crossing the channel in small boats and who are desperate enough to try and who are desperate enough to try and make _ and who are desperate enough to try and make it — and who are desperate enough to try and make it across the channel in small— and make it across the channel in small boats. what's being quoted here is— small boats. what's being quoted here is that the uk government is prepared — here is that the uk government is prepared to send these boats back into french waters, warning france at this— into french waters, warning france at this is— into french waters, warning france at this is that danger of people's lives _ at this is that danger of people's lives already trying to make it across. — lives already trying to make it across, particularly in that final stage — across, particularly in that final stage. but it is an issue that clearly— stage. but it is an issue that clearly exercises the home secretary, and lots of newspapers over the _ secretary, and lots of newspapers over the last week shows no signs of easing _ over the last week shows no signs of easing as _ over the last week shows no signs of easing as she tries to find a solution _ easing as she tries to find a solution to the problem. we easing as she tries to find a solution to the problem. we had this covert landings _ solution to the problem. we had this covert landings commander, - solution to the problem. we had this covert landings commander, i - solution to the problem. we had this covert landings commander, i can't l covert landings commander, i can't member the proper title, appointed

by priti patel last year to try to repel all these people trying to come into the uk — that doesn't seem to have worked, and getting the french to basically stop them leaving the coastline or leaving french territorial waters seems to not have worked. craig mckenzie was saying on the radio today, a conservative kent mp, that he wasn't very keen on this idea before it was announced, or before it appeared in the newspaper because he feared all that what happened was people would simply sink their own boats in order to ensure they didn't have to go back and then be rescued. it's a really complicated picture, this, and successive governments have tried to but not been successful at discouraging illegal migration succulent that's right, and as karen says, this is something that doesn't really exercise the home secretary. she's under a lot of pressure on this because the arrival of migrants in small boats is something that,

you know, conservative mps are very concerned about. and it's a comp located issue to deal with. this proposal has been put forward in the papers tonight could be just more tough talk to make it appear like the government is really getting a grip on this issue — which the statistics at the moment don't seem to suggest it is. and actually, priti patel could be creating more problems than solving them, because the french won't be particularly pleased with this idea, and it's also potentially dangerous. i think it could be very easy for some of these papers to talk about this flood of migrants, but they are desperate people trying to find the rate to the uk, the journey people make for a laugh. so it could be

very dangerous, and i suppose cynically you could also look at this in the political context of the fact that there's been lots of conversation in the last week or so about a potential cabinet reshuffle, and priti patel�*s name has been voted among some of the other younger politicians who could be at risk —— floated. social deftly want to be seen as on the front foot of what is a key issue. latte to be seen as on the front foot of what is a key issue.— to be seen as on the front foot of what is a key issue. we will return to that question _ what is a key issue. we will return to that question of— what is a key issue. we will return to that question of a _ what is a key issue. we will return to that question of a potential - to that question of a potential reshuffle later in this review. let's move on to the i — we talked a lot about booster jabs let's move on to the i — we talked a lot about boosterjabs this autumn and winter. ti suggests the government is pretty keen to on this very quickly —— the i? government is pretty keen to on this very quickly -- the i?— very quickly -- the i? that's correct. _ very quickly -- the i? that's correct. we _ very quickly -- the i? that's correct, we understand, - very quickly -- the i? that's correct, we understand, my| very quickly -- the i? that's - correct, we understand, my paper is reporting on this tonight, that the

joint committee on vaccination and immunisation, thejcvi, who advised the