this is bbc news. the headlines... china has condemned a new security deal between the us, britain, and australia, saying it showed a cold war mentality. the leaders of the three countries said the agreement would promote stability in the indo—pacific region. the us secretary of state has described france as a vital partner after french ministers reacted angrily to australia scrapping its multi—billion dollar deal to buy french submarines, in favour of nuclear—powered vessels using american and british technology. the roll—out of covid boosterjabs is under way in england and wales, with more than 30 million people expected to receive an extra layer of protection this winter. nhs staff have been among the first to receive them. italy has become the first european country to make it compulsory for workers to have a covid pass showing proof of vaccination, a negative test, or recovery from the virus.

hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are annabel denham, director of communications for the institute of economic affairs, and the broadcasterjohn stapleton. tomorrow's front pages, starting with... a real mix of stories on tomorrow's front pages. the guardian focuses on worries that a new nuclear submarine deal between britain, the us and australia could ratchet up tensions with china. it says officials in the uk and us are now working to deal with an international backlash to the pact. claims in the financial times tomorrow that the chancellor is going to set out new rules around government borrowing in next month's budget. the paper says rishi sunak will commit to stop borrowing to fund day—to—day spending within three years.

the i claims that the government will approve the use of genetically—engineered crops in the uk, breaking away from eu rules. the paper claims trials are to get started in hertforshire, with the aim of getting products onto supermarket shelves within five years. priti patel is demanding "decisive action" from police against climate protestors. that's according to the telegraph. it says the home secretary was responding to campaign group blockades on the m25 earlier this week. the metro splashes on the story of alleged racist abuse directed at bbc sport presenter, gavin ramjaun, on twitter. it claims the social media firm told him abusive comments posted online didn't violate its rules, when he complained to them. plenty of papers to discuss. the ft begins with the headline, "china attacks cold war mentality." when i was based in china, a hotline

was set up between the us and china. we all got very excited about that and talked about what would happen. it was about the mentality of... this comes back as the us and the uk, potentially setting themselves up. uk, potentially setting themselves u -. ~ uk, potentially setting themselves u, . , , ~' uk, potentially setting themselves u . _ . , , ~' ., , up. well, yes, i think the mentality is really interesting. _ up. well, yes, i think the mentality is really interesting. i _ up. well, yes, i think the mentality is really interesting. i think - up. well, yes, i think the mentality is really interesting. i think there . is really interesting. i think there was hope among the west that as china developed from a developing country to a developed nation as soon as it opened up and traded with the rest of the world, some of the attitudes might change. it seemed it's taking an increase in the

aggressive stance. i think this has left the west with no choice but to form these sorts of strategic alliances to a divert our attention to this tilt. it's a delicate game that needs to be played. i think it's right that we need to see a goal that the you cast —— eight us and uk... carrya big stick. ithink that's the message we're trying to send here. we are trying to tread delicately. i think we're going to hear a little more analysis at a lot of debate about whether we are on

the cusp of a new cold war. i'm not so sure, and i think you know the current approach isn't working. we need a new way of engaging with china. but at the moment, it'sjust very uncertain. this deal has called his problem with our relationship with france, possibly new zealand as well. it will be interesting to see how this unfolds. i’m well. it will be interesting to see how this unfolds.— well. it will be interesting to see how this unfolds. i'm beginning to lose count of _ how this unfolds. i'm beginning to lose count of all _ how this unfolds. i'm beginning to lose count of all the _ how this unfolds. i'm beginning to lose count of all the cold - how this unfolds. i'm beginning to lose count of all the cold wars. - lose count of all the cold wars. we've got another one with russia, the old one finished but may be coming back. let's begin the guardian newspaper.

amid packed... i did ask an expert earlier on if it was more in less, and he said it was more likely. if indeed china invades taiwan, what will be _ indeed china invades taiwan, what will be our— indeed china invades taiwan, what will be our stance. let's not forget us, australia and uk are taking action_ us, australia and uk are taking action and _ us, australia and uk are taking action and reaction to military power. — action and reaction to military power, but the biggest navy in the world _ power, but the biggest navy in the world right now. certain countries... it is been considerable concern _ countries... it is been considerable concern about this. france had a £27 biiiion— concern about this. france had a £27 billion deal — concern about this. france had a £27 billion deal. get nuclear out of my head! _ billion deal. get nuclear out of my head! electric powered submarines. the first— head! electric powered submarines. the first day was the press conference.— the first day was the press conference. j ., . ., conference. they've also cancelled a aala in conference. they've also cancelled a gala in washington _ conference. they've also cancelled a gala in washington and _ conference. they've also cancelled a gala in washington and said - conference. they've also cancelled a gala in washington and said it - gala in washington and said it wasn't quite right time for everyone to go and have drinks together when

a huge fridge contract had been cancelled. is this a slight reshipped of everyone's relationship? i reshipped of everyone's relationship?— relationship? i think it re-strengthens - relationship? ithink it re-strengthens these | relationship? i think it - re-strengthens these special re—strengthens these special relationships. i know this was initiated by australia. that tilt in diverting resources towards that region. tensions after the removal of troops from afghanistan, and there was a lot of discussion over what this meant from the us. this shows us that the us is more outward looking than some had feared. i think we're going to seejoe biden try and turn into a china containing block, and set aside the strategy of

liberal internationalism. i think thatis liberal internationalism. i think that is no longer working. just got to be very careful that an increasingly confrontational relationship with china can be dangerous. relationship with china can be dangemus-— dangerous. confrontational relationships _ dangerous. confrontational relationships brings - dangerous. confrontational relationships brings us - dangerous. confrontational relationships brings us to l dangerous. confrontational i relationships brings us to the telegraph. on the front page, priti patel urges police to get tough on climate protesters. the person on the left is not a police officer, it is a motorist who is pulling someone who is not willing to be an activist —— an activist he wants to stay there. john stapleton... how will this go down? i john stapleton. .. how will this go down? . _ john stapleton. .. how will this go down? . ,, down? i have some sympathy for the olice. it down? i have some sympathy for the police. it seems _ down? i have some sympathy for the police. it seems they _ down? i have some sympathy for the police. it seems they are _ down? i have some sympathy for the police. it seems they are in -

down? i have some sympathy for the police. it seems they are in between| police. it seems they are in between a rock— police. it seems they are in between a rock and _ police. it seems they are in between a rock and a — police. it seems they are in between a rock and a hard place. having said all that, _ a rock and a hard place. having said all that, i_ a rock and a hard place. having said all that, i think the protesters... they— all that, i think the protesters... they have — all that, i think the protesters... they have every right to protest and their cause — they have every right to protest and their cause is legitimate. it's not that critical, it's not that headline grabbing. it's about insulating your homes. having said all that, _ insulating your homes. having said all that, they are disrupting relief seriously— all that, they are disrupting relief seriously for a lot of people. they've _ seriously for a lot of people. they've been waiting for over two years _ they've been waiting for over two years. drivers are not meeting their targets _ years. drivers are not meeting their targets. they're infuriating people all oven _ targets. they're infuriating people all over. it's not good news from their— all over. it's not good news from their point— all over. it's not good news from their point of view, in my opinion. they— their point of view, in my opinion. they did _ their point of view, in my opinion. they did clear people, by the way. dozens _ they did clear people, by the way. dozens of— they did clear people, by the way. dozens of arrests. they weren't entirely — dozens of arrests. they weren't

entirely inactive. it's a difficult role, _ entirely inactive. it's a difficult role, in — entirely inactive. it's a difficult role, in my— entirely inactive. it's a difficult role, in my opinion.— entirely inactive. it's a difficult role, in my opinion. let's see you make it past _ role, in my opinion. let's see you make it past the _ role, in my opinion. let's see you make it past the protest - role, in my opinion. let's see you make it past the protest withoutl make it past the protest without trying to remove them from the street like this motorist is doing. then you get to our next story in then you get to our next story in the telegraph. costly pcr tests set to be ditched are all double jabbed travellers. not great news for the pcr companies, and i've lost track of the range of prices.— companies, and i've lost track of the range of prices. some of them are absolutely _ the range of prices. some of them are absolutely astronomical. - the range of prices. some of them are absolutely astronomical. i - the range of prices. some of them| are absolutely astronomical. i went overseas not that long after the traffic lights in system was implemented. it was eye watering with the company i went to, and added to the costs for families

going overseas. you would have to spend 150 on all of the pcr tests. of course, going overseas, you have that hanging over you. administrative logistical challenges that you need to jump through. i think you will have lots of relieved brits looking forward to the next time they go overseas. not least parents, because it looks like this will come in in time for half term when the schools break up and a lot of people will want to be able to go overseas who haven't been able to do so. there was a line that stuck out

for me in that article, which was that potentially, the unvaccinated will face tougher rules. it will be interesting to see the backlash that comes off the back of this because already, we've had notjust anti—vaxxers, but staunchly libertarian disposition who have been fighting back against opening up been fighting back against opening up the vaccines to 12 to is—year—olds, who have been staunchly opposed to vaccine passports, which now appeared to be put on the isa least. anyway, this is a positive trend, but it will be interesting to see what happens to those who haven't been double jabbed and what the rules will be for them.

for double jabbed travellers, if they can get past the over 25, it's ok? , ., , �* . ., . 0k? great news if i'm concerned. i think when — ok? great news if i'm concerned. i think when i— 0k? great news if i'm concerned. i think when i came _ 0k? great news if i'm concerned. i think when i came back, _ 0k? great news if i'm concerned. i think when i came back, that - 0k? great news if i'm concerned. i| think when i came back, that was... two people. — think when i came back, that was... two people. i— think when i came back, that was... two people, i recommend about 30 grams _ two people, i recommend about 30 grarns that— two people, i recommend about 30 grams that day. there's some organisations who made a great deal of money— organisations who made a great deal of money out of this. particularly for the _ of money out of this. particularly for the double jabbed. of money out of this. particularly forthe double jabbed. i of money out of this. particularly for the double jabbed. i have to say, _ for the double jabbed. i have to say, it— for the double jabbed. i have to say, it seems to me unnecessary. having — say, it seems to me unnecessary. having said — say, it seems to me unnecessary. having said all that, we will have to have _ having said all that, we will have to have a — having said all that, we will have to have a lateral flow test, not one the government will have to pay for. i'm extremely good at lateral flow test by now and i'm sure all of you

are. let's go on to the i newspaper. you might want to think of what you're going to eat. jean edited food coming to uk plates. this is not the title of a disaster film, this coming to uk plates. this is not the title of a disasterfilm, this is the future. it title of a disaster film, this is the future-— the future. it is indeed, and talkin: the future. it is indeed, and talking to — the future. it is indeed, and talking to you _ the future. it is indeed, and talking to you about - the future. it is indeed, and i talking to you about research, the future. it is indeed, and - talking to you about research, so there is a local information. yes, it's a very interesting and complex discussion that they're having at the moment, and there's this classic talk up between potentially enormous gains unleashed until the natural world. we know britain's productivity stagnated at a time. innovation to higher crop yields and returning it to nature. farmers have

been constrained from embracing innovation. gene editing and precision farming. all these sorts of things that can bring down costs to farmers and falls to consumers. post—brexit, it will be interesting to see what the opportunities are and which opportunities we're able to seize. farmers believe they can get new altered food within five years. does that tempt you? hot altered food within five years. does that tempt you?— that tempt you? not necessarily. it's not a subject _ that tempt you? not necessarily. it's not a subject i've _ that tempt you? not necessarily. it's not a subject i've studied - that tempt you? not necessarily. it's not a subject i've studied in l it's not a subject i've studied in great _ it's not a subject i've studied in great detail. i gather these crops will be _ great detail. i gather these crops will be more nutritious and resistant. we don't perhaps no enough — resistant. we don't perhaps no enough about the consequences. i need _ enough about the consequences. i need to— enough about the consequences. i need to know a lot more before i -ive need to know a lot more before i give up _ need to know a lot more before i give up my— need to know a lot more before i give up my regulars.— need to know a lot more before i give up my regulars. we're going to look at two — give up my regulars. we're going to look at two papers _ give up my regulars. we're going to look at two papers with _

give up my regulars. we're going to look at two papers with the - give up my regulars. we're going to look at two papers with the same i look at two papers with the same subjects. first the financial times. we have to look at