removed, one from inside and one from the mouth of the tunnel. so expect a lot of work going on here in terms of investigation and physically in terms of that rescue and recovery operation in the next few and days. and recovery operation in the next few and dim-— and we'll be taking an in—depth look at the papers with our reviewers, the journalist and author shyama perera, and olivia utley, assistant comment editor at the daily telegraph. that's coming up after the headlines. time for a look at the weather with louise lear. hello there. trying to make plans for your monday morning? well, here is what to expect. it is going to be a case of sunny spells and blustery showers. i think it will also feel just that little bit cooler as a wind direction is changing to a north—westerly. so, showers from the word go across scotland, northern ireland, north—west england and north wales, and some of these showers will be pushed steadily southwards by the strength of the wind direction into the afternoon. temperatures down on the last couple of days.

highs of 9—11; degrees. now, as we go through the evening, some of those showers will tend to fade away. most of the showers will day back towards north and west facing coasts, but where we have got those clearer skies and the winds fall lighter, well, the temperatures will fall into low single figures, so we could see a touch of frost in some sheltered areas first thing on tuesday morning. tuesday into wednesday, still a case of sunny spells and scattered showers and it's going to feel rather cool, particularly on exposed coasts. take care. that is how it is looking. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are journalist and author shyama perera, and olivia utley, assistant comment

editor at the daily telegraph. good evening to you both. first i will show some of those from the pages. —— front pages. the 620 summit and the cop26 conference in glasgow dominate most of the front pages. the financial times�* headline says there's a "huge way to go" at the climate summit, as it reports there was no agreement among 620 leaders on phasing out coal power. "if glasgow fails then the whole thing fails," according to the i newspaper's front page, as the prime minister says it's touch and go whether progress can be made. the daily telegraph's front page has a story about the growing row between france and the uk on fishing rights, with the eu accusing the uk of seeking a brexit clash. we are one minute to midnight when it comes to climate change, according to the guardian's front page, which carries a picture

of 620 leaders throwing coins into rome's trevi fountain. "we can't let cop26 be a cop out" is the daily mail's front page, quoting the prime minister, borisjohnson, who will speak at the glasgow climate change meeting on monday. the times carries mrjohnson�*s warning that it's the world's last chance on climate change. there's also a picture of him and the president of france. mr macron apparently giving the pm an ultimatum in the row over fishing. the metro's front page has a picture of the "tunnel horror" after two trains collided in a tunnel near salisbury. that was a little flavour of the front pages you will be waking up to tomorrow morning. let's discuss them, and, shyama perera, 0livia utley, lovely to see both, and we'll start with the front page the guardian. shyama perera, could you 6uardian. shyama perera, could you start us with the lead story

dominating there.- start us with the lead story dominating there. yes, the lead sto on dominating there. yes, the lead story on every — dominating there. yes, the lead story on every front _ dominating there. yes, the lead story on every front page - dominating there. yes, the lead story on every front page as - dominating there. yes, the lead story on every front page as we | story on every front page as we begin the week. i love photograph on the front of the guardian, you can see them throwing coins in the fountain, who will wear the valentina? not boris or angela judging by their expressions. but one is saying make it mine, make it mine, make it mine. it is the report borisjohnson has been saying about us being one minute to midnight to the domesday scenario and it reminds me of that midnight, the stroke of midnight, india will be free, and this is the very opposite, it is the end of the world as we know it, says boris. the one thing i wonder as i read through the front pages of tomorrow, when do we start telling

people what the risk assessment says and what going to do if things do not work out as hoped? clearly boris is not confident. he not work out as hoped? clearly boris is not confident.— is not confident. he didn't sound rather gloomy. _ is not confident. he didn't sound rather gloomy, didn't _ is not confident. he didn't sound rather gloomy, didn't he, - is not confident. he didn't sound| rather gloomy, didn't he, olivia? is not confident. he didn't sound - rather gloomy, didn't he, olivia? we had the italian prime minister praising achievements at 620, not everyone was as happy all would agree with that, but i think the downbeat mood as they move on to cop26 in glasgow. downbeat mood as they move onto com in glasgow.— cop26 in glasgow. yes, and it is obvious when _ cop26 in glasgow. yes, and it is obvious when you _ cop26 in glasgow. yes, and it is obvious when you see _ cop26 in glasgow. yes, and it is obvious when you see it - cop26 in glasgow. yes, and it is obvious when you see it from . cop26 in glasgow. yes, and it is i obvious when you see it from boris johnson, _ obvious when you see it from boris johnson, such an upbeat character generally— johnson, such an upbeat character generally and has been so upbeat about_ generally and has been so upbeat about cop26 for such a long time and he has _ about cop26 for such a long time and he has been _ about cop26 for such a long time and he has been at the front of the pro—market capitalist green agenda. he presented himself as the person who can _ he presented himself as the person who can lead the environmental revolution— who can lead the environmental revolution from conservative perspective as opposed to better fund or— perspective as opposed to better fund or the communist way of changing _ fund or the communist way of changing the environment. he has

been _ changing the environment. he has been so _ changing the environment. he has been so upbeat and has all these plans— been so upbeat and has all these plans to — been so upbeat and has all these plans to save the planet and now it feels _ plans to save the planet and now it feels like _ plans to save the planet and now it feels like it— plans to save the planet and now it feels like it is dawning on him that it is not— feels like it is dawning on him that it is not going to happen the way he wanie— it is not going to happen the way he wants it _ it is not going to happen the way he wants it w — it is not going to happen the way he wants it w i— it is not going to happen the way he wants it to. i have seen a lot of people — wants it to. i have seen a lot of people reading the front pages —— i think— people reading the front pages —— i think a _ people reading the front pages —— i think a lot — people reading the front pages —— i think a lot of people reading the front— think a lot of people reading the front pages tomorrow might think, we have been— front pages tomorrow might think, we have been here before and had these grandiose _ have been here before and had these grandiose summits so many times and they ali— grandiose summits so many times and they all seem to end in failure and at what _ they all seem to end in failure and at what point must we say, is this the way— at what point must we say, is this the way to— at what point must we say, is this the way to do it? because on the other— the way to do it? because on the other this — the way to do it? because on the other this huge conference which has so many— other this huge conference which has so many people flying in from all over the — so many people flying in from all over the world, we are hearing it is going _ over the world, we are hearing it is going to _ over the world, we are hearing it is going to be — over the world, we are hearing it is going to be a bit of a flop. and so what _ going to be a bit of a flop. and so what is _ going to be a bit of a flop. and so what is the — going to be a bit of a flop. and so what is the point, some people might wake up _ what is the point, some people might wake up and ask themselves tomorrow morning _ wake up and ask themselves tomorrow morninu. ,, ,. . wake up and ask themselves tomorrow morninu. ,, ,~ ., �*, wake up and ask themselves tomorrow morninu. ,, ,~ . �*, ., morning. shyama, let's turn to the front -a~e morning. shyama, let's turn to the front page of _ morning. shyama, let's turn to the front page of the _ morning. shyama, let's turn to the front page of the i. _ morning. shyama, let's turn to the front page of the i. if _ morning. shyama, let's turn to the front page of the i. if glasgow - front page of the i. if 6lasgow fails it all fails, and what struck me about this is when we think back to the paris accord, that figure of

1.5, 1.5 degrees, was mentioned, and we are only hearing now that there is complete agreement and that is the figure that they should be aiming for. what were they doing in between that time? trio aiming for. what were they doing in between that time?— between that time? no idea, this is cop26, so between that time? no idea, this is com, so there _ between that time? no idea, this is cop26, so there were _ between that time? no idea, this is cop26, so there were 25 _ between that time? no idea, this is cop26, so there were 25 when - between that time? no idea, this is cop26, so there were 25 when we | between that time? no idea, this is i cop26, so there were 25 when we got to paris, and it took that long to get that far. i think olivia is being very optimistic about our prime minister having a plan to save the planet. the whole point is that we have had no plans to save the planet and this prime minister nor his predecessors, so we are in this mess and it is just as much of our making as those who are absent, like vladimir putin and the president of china. the i is obviouslyjust giving us a warning and the different points, one of which is that the leaders are accused of making hollow pledges, the leaders of the world's richest countries, 620 has failed to set targets of net

zero x 2050, the prime minister says it is touch and go. and the uk but an extra £1 billion into climate finance and that will not go very far. —— put an extra £1 billion. first we could get the world vaccinated against covid, putting us in a better position to fight climate change. this is the evidence, finally, that we have done nothing. evidence, finally, that we have done nothinu. . . , evidence, finally, that we have done nothin.. ., .,, , ., nothing. that was questioned i posed to ou, nothing. that was questioned i posed to you. what — nothing. that was questioned i posed to you. what has _ nothing. that was questioned i posed to you, what has been _ nothing. that was questioned i posed to you, what has been happening - nothing. that was questioned i posed to you, what has been happening alll to you, what has been happening all this time? olivia, i will turn to the mail, because we are still on the mail, because we are still on the subject, the headline this time is that we cannot let cop26 be a cop out, and he is saying here, boris johnson, that it is time to concrete timetables for change. do they know what they are committing to? do they know how to fix it? i what they are committing to? do they know how to fix it?— know how to fix it? i think this is

a bi art know how to fix it? i think this is a big part of _ know how to fix it? i think this is a big part of the _ know how to fix it? i think this is a big part of the issue. _ know how to fix it? i think this is a big part of the issue. they - know how to fix it? i think this is j a big part of the issue. they love the idea — a big part of the issue. they love the idea of— a big part of the issue. they love the idea of concrete timetables and like talking about it, but there is a lot— like talking about it, but there is a lot about — like talking about it, but there is a lot about what and when and not much _ a lot about what and when and not much about — a lot about what and when and not much about how. as we have already seen in _ much about how. as we have already seen in the _ much about how. as we have already seen in the uk, we tried to get to this great— seen in the uk, we tried to get to this great place with reducing carbon— this great place with reducing carbon emissions with a huge amount of wind _ carbon emissions with a huge amount of wind power and that is great and brilliant _ of wind power and that is great and brilliant and sounds good, the rhetoric — brilliant and sounds good, the rhetoric was great, the uk got a lot of runs— rhetoric was great, the uk got a lot of runs up— rhetoric was great, the uk got a lot of runs up from the international community— of runs up from the international community and then we ended up having _ community and then we ended up having to — community and then we ended up having to fire up a coal station because — having to fire up a coal station because we are not making enough wind power. there is too much effort being _ wind power. there is too much effort being but— wind power. there is too much effort being put into these summits and creating _ being put into these summits and creating these targets and talking about _ creating these targets and talking about holding other countries to account, — about holding other countries to account, and all we can do is set example — account, and all we can do is set example by— account, and all we can do is set example by working out how to do it ourselves _ example by working out how to do it ourselves and not quite enough energy— ourselves and not quite enough energy has been put into working out what exactly we're going to do to reach _ what exactly we're going to do to reach these targets rather than just talking _ reach these targets rather than just talking about dates and fixing dates and telling off other countries for

not getting their dates in place. we should _ not getting their dates in place. we should be _ not getting their dates in place. we should be working out how we're going _ should be working out how we're going to — should be working out how we're going to do it. gk, should be working out how we're going to do it— should be working out how we're going to do it. ok, we will turn out to the ft, — going to do it. ok, we will turn out to the ft, shyama, _ going to do it. ok, we will turn out to the ft, shyama, again, - going to do it. ok, we will turn out to the ft, shyama, again, the - going to do it. ok, we will turn out. to the ft, shyama, again, the same subject but at this time we're concentrating on story of coal and limited 620 curbs on coal leave a huge way to go at climate summit. as olivia said, we are going to open a deep coal mine in cumbria. yes. olivia said, we are going to open a deep coal mine in cumbria. yes, and this is the g20 _ deep coal mine in cumbria. yes, and this is the g20 meeting _ deep coal mine in cumbria. yes, and this is the g20 meeting that - deep coal mine in cumbria. yes, and this is the g20 meeting that we - deep coal mine in cumbria. yes, and this is the g20 meeting that we just| this is the 620 meeting that we just had, and they are taking this into the cop26 conference. borisjohnson has said that he thinks we have made reasonable progress, there is still a way to go. this again, i will be touring and throwing on this, and we have got to do something about it, but it is like wanting multilateral nuclear disarmament, as long as you

need multilateral nuclear disarmament there was no need for unilateral nuclear disarmament, and we have carried on like that, and it is like that with climate change. we keep wanting a consensus even as we break every rule, and we feel this is almost a get out ofjail free card for us on the basis there is no consensus, therefore why do not carry on breaking every rule? i keep throwing forward, it is that need to understand, what are we going to do if this does not work? there must be, somewhere, a doomsday scenario which says, people of the south will start adding to countries of the north or populations will be decimated. we keep getting told the geographical thing of violence being lost, there will be extreme weather conditions, but what will actually happen as populations start to move? in what direction will only move and

how will we manage it?— how will we manage it? before we leave this behind, _ how will we manage it? before we leave this behind, olivia, - how will we manage it? before we | leave this behind, olivia, countries like russia have said, no, we will not sign up to the 2050, we will go to 2060, and it makes you wonder, we have had very limited, and as has been described, vague promises and platitudes heading towards co p26 promises and platitudes heading towards cop26 or earlier, as we go towards cop26 or earlier, as we go towards cop26, one person said, whilst 2050 the magic number? it is whilst 2050 the magic number? it is embarrassing. it is not even a platitude, _ embarrassing. it is not even a platitude, they are not really setting — platitude, they are not really setting themselves targets at all, they are — setting themselves targets at all, they are saying they will do it in their— they are saying they will do it in their own — they are saying they will do it in their own time, china and russia. i think— their own time, china and russia. i think that — their own time, china and russia. i think that should not give them a -et think that should not give them a get out _ think that should not give them a get out of— think that should not give them a get out ofjail free card, it is not too easy— get out ofjail free card, it is not too easy to _ get out ofjail free card, it is not too easy to say, we cannot do anything — too easy to say, we cannot do anything so why should we do anything? we cannot afford that,

because — anything? we cannot afford that, because china and russia are huge polluters— because china and russia are huge polluters and if they will not play ball, polluters and if they will not play ball. it _ polluters and if they will not play ball, it will be very difficult if not impossible to achieve the targets — not impossible to achieve the targets we have set ourselves. olivia, — targets we have set ourselves. olivia, same paper, different story, britain and france blaming each other in the heated dispute over fishing rights. olivia?— fishing rights. olivia? sorry, i cou~hed fishing rights. olivia? sorry, i coughed as— fishing rights. olivia? sorry, i coughed as he _ fishing rights. olivia? sorry, i coughed as he said _ fishing rights. olivia? sorry, i coughed as he said that. - fishing rights. olivia? sorry, i| coughed as he said that. same fishing rights. olivia? sorry, i- coughed as he said that. same paper, the ft, but we — coughed as he said that. same paper, the ft, but we are _ coughed as he said that. same paper, the ft, but we are discussing - coughed as he said that. same paper, the ft, but we are discussing the - the ft, but we are discussing the fishing dispute between britain and france. , , ., , france. yes, interesting development toda , france. yes, interesting development today. president _ france. yes, interesting development today, president macron _ france. yes, interesting development today, president macron and - france. yes, interesting development today, president macron and boris . today, president macron and boris have met — today, president macron and boris have met and they came out with contrasting briefs on what happened in the _ contrasting briefs on what happened in the meeting. macron said we're trying _ in the meeting. macron said we're trying to— in the meeting. macron said we're trying to make it up and boris has said we _ trying to make it up and boris has said we haven't, so it does not look like we _ said we haven't, so it does not look like we are — said we haven't, so it does not look like we are heading to any de—escalation at any time soon. i can very— de—escalation at any time soon. i can very much see why boris johnson is annoyed _ can very much see why boris johnson is annoyed. the uk has granted 98%

of fishing _ is annoyed. the uk has granted 98% of fishing boats in the waters around — of fishing boats in the waters around the channel islands licences to carry— around the channel islands licences to carry on — around the channel islands licences to carry on fishing and the 2% that have _ to carry on fishing and the 2% that have not— to carry on fishing and the 2% that have not been granted that licence and produce no evidence in the four years— and produce no evidence in the four years before brexit, so it seems like they— years before brexit, so it seems like they are trying it on and i can see why— like they are trying it on and i can see why boris is not interested in macron's— see why boris is not interested in macron's promised to de—escalate when _ macron's promised to de—escalate when he _ macron's promised to de—escalate when he is — macron's promised to de—escalate when he is making these ridiculous threats— when he is making these ridiculous threats and — when he is making these ridiculous threats and france is in the wrong. but on _ threats and france is in the wrong. but on the — threats and france is in the wrong. but on the other hand, diplomacy is the only— but on the other hand, diplomacy is the only way we will solve this, we are heading — the only way we will solve this, we are heading into this huge climate conference and watching britain and france, _ conference and watching britain and france, it _ conference and watching britain and france, it all seems silly and small fry france, it all seems silly and small try and _ france, it all seems silly and small try and i_ france, it all seems silly and small fry and i think in the long—term, it will not _ fry and i think in the long—term, it will not do — fry and i think in the long—term, it will not do either country either president— will not do either country either president or prime minister, particularly much political good at home _ particularly much political good at home it — particularly much political good at home. it makes them look a bit small and macron— home. it makes them look a bit small and macron is thinking it will be good _ and macron is thinking it will be good for— and macron is thinking it will be good for him and appealed to right—wing nationalists in the run-up— right—wing nationalists in the run-up to _ right—wing nationalists in the run—up to the french election if he

is picking — run—up to the french election if he is picking a — run—up to the french election if he is picking a fight with britain, but i'm is picking a fight with britain, but i'm not— is picking a fight with britain, but i'm not sure that is true at the moment _ i'm not sure that is true at the moment i_ i'm not sure that is true at the moment. i think they are both a little _ moment. i think they are both a little bit — moment. i think they are both a little bit silly.— little bit silly. ok, we have run out of time- — little bit silly. ok, we have run out of time. shyama, - little bit silly. ok, we have run out of time. shyama, i - little bit silly. ok, we have run out of time. shyama, i was - little bit silly. ok, we have run i out of time. shyama, i was going little bit silly. ok, we have run - out of time. shyama, i was going to get your thoughts on it but the same story on the daily telegraph, the eu chief is saying the same thing about the uk wanting a brexit clash. we will talk about that at 11:30pm. olivia, you need a glass of water. i will see you both at 1130. see you both shortly. thank you forjoining us here. next it's time for click.

tick, tick... we've heard the warnings for some time. they've been getting louder and louder. the question is, has our time to act run out? 2020 was the joint hottest year on record. hurricanes and flash floods have battered the planet. the earth is in crisis. and maybe, just maybe, this time, something will be done. next week, we'll be at the cop26 un climate change conference in glasgow, where pressure is building on those in power to make big changes. and this is the first of three click specials all about sustainability — what we can change and how much technology can help.

we all know plastic is a problem for our planet. left unchecked, the ocean could contain more plastic than fish by 2050. but much of the harm comes from things that we can't see so clearly, like the fossil fuels emitting greenhouse gases. they currently emit more than 30 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, and every bit of co2 that goes into the air pushes the global temperature up just that little bit more. and we can'tjust flick a switch, turn everything off and kill our emissions dead, so even to get to net zero, we're going to have to start sucking huge amounts of co2 back out. dan simmons and nick kwek have been looking into carbon capture technologies to see if they really could help us turn back the clock. clock ticks. for this film, we are focusing on co2 — the carbon that is produced mainly by burning fossil fuels and is the biggest contributor to rising temperatures. for decades, we've been able

to capture carbon dioxide at scale at the source it's produced. in 2014, this was the first power station to use what's called carbon capture and storage. the flue gases are diverted to a purpose—built facility where the co2 is stripped away in a chemical process. it's then compressed and stored two miles underground. the system here stops around two—thirds of the co2 from reaching the atmosphere. last year, that was three quarters of a million tons. other projects are even more efficient. so couldn't we just ramp this up a notch or two and solve climate crisis for good? well, in theory, that would need tens of thousands more of these and today, we have fewer than 30 worldwide and sort of the same number again promised for the next 20 years. and it seems ccs, at least so far, is not a big winner.

despite concerted efforts over the last two decades, really, it hasn't taken off as a successful, economically viable technology at commercial scales, and that's because it's very costly — you know, you can't fit carbon capture to the exhaust pipes of cars, for example, you know, the technologyjust isn't downscalable to that sort of size. so now, another way to capture carbon is gaining ground, one that doesn't have to be where the pollution is created. in fact, you could put it in some of the cleanest parts of the world. i've come to switzerland to look at an exciting and relatively new way to clean up the planet's atmosphere, and it's being pioneered right here. climeworks is one of the companies hoping the answer to the great carbon clean—up is in the thin air around us.

these huge intake fans called collectors are sucking in the air from around them and they're taking out the co2, and because co2 is around us everywhere, you can place these, well, pretty much anywhere on the planet. they can be cleaning up the environment. natalie casas leads the team here. she moved from carbon capture to direct air capture after seeing expensive projects scrapped because of their cost. so we have a 2—stage process. in the first stage, we blow air through. co2 sticks on the material, they are purified air — so air without co2 or with very little co2 — leaves the box. when the filter�*s full, we close the door and start heating. we heat up the collector up to 100 degrees, co2 is released and we take it out. once the filters are cleaned, the carbon capture can start all over again.

perhaps one of the best technologies at solving the carbon problem is nature itself. i've come to brynau wood in south wales, one the last patches of a once enormous ancient woodland. today, a reforestation project is under way. many countries have committed to planting more trees to soak up co2 but my guide 6wyn says the mix of trees planted is crucial to success. when there is a mixed amount of tree species within a forest, so the more biodiverse we have in terms of what's above the ground, the more biodiverse it is below the ground and the more carbon ends up in the soil, where it's stored for a very, very long time. so does he think nature alone could lead us to carbon neutrality? this is a recent plantation. there's around about 15—20 different tree and shrub species and this

was planted last year, in the last winter, which is a year ago for us now but, as you can see, they're really not getting anywhere above waist height. that really puts emphasis on how we have to conserve our mature forests because this plantation here is going to probably take maybe 20, 30 years to really have an impact. it's been estimated that to reduce co2 by a billion tons, you'd need a new forest twice the size of california. but together, could technology and nature suck up the co2 mess we're currently making? if we look at planting trees or afforestation, then the feeling was that that could remove something of the order of about 3 billion tons of carbon dioxide by mid century. and with carbon capture and storage which, if done right, could also be a net carbon removal technology, that might contribute something like 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide removal by mid century. and then direct air capture, something like three,

maybe as high as five, billion tons by mid century. now, if you add all of those up, you are talking about 10 billion tons of co2 removal by mid century. that might seem like a lot, but comparing it to our current emissions, which are 35 billion tons of co2, it only represents about a third of the solution. and so that means to deal with the other two thirds, we need to get much more energy—efficient and if, on top of that, carbon removal technologies can help us along the way, then that's great, but let's not pin our hopes on those technologies alone. producing food is itself not that green. farming contributes more than 8% of all greenhouse gases. we're already beyond the boundaries of what the earth can sustain in terms of human population, so we need to be much more efficient in what we do. and jp may have a solution. i'm in finland, just

outside helsinki — but i can't tell you where, because this is a super—secret test centre, where they're taking co2 out of the air... ..and brewing something rather special. oh, my gosh! you've gotta see this, this is bubbling. in these vats is a newly discovered species of microbe. the bacteria multiplies very quickly. it feeds on minerals, on co2 from the air and hydrogen, which is also taken from water in the air using electrolysis. and every day, some of it is drained off, superheated, dried and turned into a kind of protein powder that they're calling solein. this is food that doesn't need vast fields — itjust needs a warm, dark place to grow. this pilot project is turning 2kg of co2 into 1kg of powder every day, and the only by—product is water, which is also recycled.

food technologist anna hakamies has been studying the structure, taste and nutritional value of solein to create new foods. so this is it, this is the raw solein powder. obviously you're not supposed to eat itjust like this because if you do... it tastes like... well, like floor. what would you have to do with this powder before you can actually add it to food? solein can be used as an ingredient in meat replacing products, other non—dairy products, and then also plant products, cereals and even pasta. i've been told that you've prepared something that is not the raw powder for me to eat. yeah, ice cream. ice cream! it's quite appetising... yeah.

i have to say, garnished with a few petals. yeah, there's only four ingredients. like, solein, water, fat and sugar. it's very nice. it's actually more like a sorbet than an ice cream. it's italian gelato. i get paid to do this! the powder is 65% protein, so 2.5 times more than cooked lean beef. it's also 15% carbs and 8% fat with lots of amino acids, vitamins and minerals. how many people have tried this so far? actually. ..eight. wow! laughs. so if this does get regulatory approval and it does go on sale in 2023, this could provide an alternative to meat and crops that is climate friendly. and when i say climate friendly... it's dairy free, which, trust me, everyone in the room will be glad about

in half an hour. there's another cut in emissions right there. and that's it for the shortcut of this week's click, the full length version is of course waiting for you right now on iplayer. and don't forget, this is the first of our three sustainability specials. next week, we're going to be live at cop26 in glasgow. in the meantime, don't forget we live on social media, on youtube, facebook, instagram and twitter @bbcclick. thanks for watching and, er...get your own ice cream! good evening. plenty of showers out there at the moment, or longer spells of rain, particularly in the far north of scotland, where today's

rain is still lingering. the showers circulating around an area of low pressure, pushing in from the west, so it stays quite blustery and showery through the course of the night. temperatures will sit between five and nine degrees. now, plenty of showers around to start the new working week, but the wind direction swinging around to a northerly, and that is going to drive some cooler air down from the north, so if you are caught in those showers with a blustery northerly wind, it is going to feel disappointingly cool in comparison to recent days. 9—11t degrees the high. cooler still as we move into tuesday. we could start off with some early morning frost around. fewer showers on tuesday, most widespread perhaps across northern scotland, northern ireland, and one or two running down through the irish sea. but even with a little more sunshine and lighter winds, temperatures are set to struggle.

welcome to newsday, reporting live from singapore, i'm karishma vaswani. and me christian fraser, live in glasgow, where world leaders are arriving for a pivotal climate change summit cop26. the headlines... the 12 days of talks here on the future of the planet are widely seen as the world's last chance to prevent irreversible damage from climate change. earlier, as leaders of the world's richest nations meeting in rome fell short of setting specific net zero targets, the cop26 host spelled out the challenge ahead. there are no compelling excuses for our procrastination. not only have we acknowledged

the problem, we're already seeing first hand the devastation that climate change causes.