as the un climate summit in glasgow runs into extra time, delegates are considering a third draft of an agreement to try to limit the effects of global warming. the conference president, alok sharma, has called for a final injection of "can—do spirit" the summit should have ended on friday evening, but it's now been extended to at least saturday afternoon, as delegates are due to consider a third draught of a climate deal. steve bannon, a former aide to donald trump, has been indicted by a federal grand jury. he's charged with contempt of congress, after refusing to give evidence to the committee investigating the january the sixth assault on the capitol. dutch police have used water canon on protestors, after a partial lockdown was announced by the government. for at least three weeks, shops and cafes will close early and sporting fixtures will be held behind closed doors. at ten o'clock... jane hill will be here with a full

round up of the days news. first its�* time for newscast — which was recorded last night. laura and chris, on the last episode, i managed to combine a news story about when is the ideal bedtime with some free market research from newscasters about when they listen to this podcast! smart. and for a man who gets up very early, it's an important thing for you to tap into. we have had enough of that already this week! what we have done is newscasters e—mailed in in literally their tens, we have had loads of e—mails about this! and we have been able to do an initial bit of analysis about when people listen to the podcast and how it fits around their bedtime ortheirwaking up. shall we see what the analysis says? i would love to see it. can we be clear we are using that term loosely? incredibly loosely! let's see. yes, this isjust a sort

of sample of the e—mails, it is not scientific analysis. and also, we have a cheap and cheerful bar chart for tv viewers to understand. people listening to the podcast, you willjust have to write it down on a piece of paper! early morning, 50%. before bed, 26%. what else? while walking the dog, 10%. i knew that would be a big scorer. yes. others, including sleepless nights, commuting, exercising and getting a covid test, 14%! gosh, the poor nurse or whoever else is doing the covid test and you don't even take your headphones out! yeah, or on a speaker, that's even worse! having adam blathering on! and also gagging or your eyes watering as a result of listening to us! which may happen even for those not getting a covid test! and it's notjust a quantative,

quantitative, i can't even say it, exercise, this analysis commissioned by professor fleming. we have also had some e—mails from newscasters. jessica says, about 10:10, that is her time to listen. probably when you are just finishing on the news. it is just after the lead sequence on the ten o'clock news, excellent, i approve. good timing, jessica. that is when she goes to bed. "the trouble is, i go to sleep almost at once." that's the effect you have, adam! "so i have to start again when i wake during the night. sometimes it takes all night to hear the whole thing." this is a cracker from liz in wiltshire. she says, "i'm head gardener on a private estate and when i'm out in the garden, i plug into newscast to catch up with the important issues of the day, although i have to admit that the local lions and tigers roaring..." lion roaring. sealion noises. that additional sound there, as i turn into david attenborough, we are reporting from cop, aren't we, are sea lions as well which are also a feature. this is quite the private estate

that you work on, liz! what kind of a estate does she work on? "they do sometimes win out over newscast some days." so occasionally, you are beaten, adam, or we are collectively beaten by the biggest beasts of the jungle and the safari. somewhere in wiltshire. mind where you go in wiltshire — you never know what is round the next corner! hello, it's chris in the studio at westminster. and laura in the studio at westminster and there are no lions or sea lions with us this evening. and it's adam, still at cop26 in glasgow which means i get to see the lovely twinkling lights of the conference venue on the beautiful calm river clyde. are there any sea lions in the clyde? no, but i did see a police scotland jet ski or at least hear one. yeah, i saw some of them last week, they were quite cool. anyway, other people have been in other parts of different climes away from the clyde, haven't they, chris?

they have, yes, flight that have headed south as well as north. gibraltar. i don't think gibraltar, i was going to say gibraltar hasn't featured as much in the news for a long time but because we did talk about it for a while... what talking about? gibraltar! exactly, where is katya when you need her? talking about gibraltar. it's a sound effect all of its own. it really is, it really is, even more exotic and the beast of wiltshire. we have been talking about gibraltar at westminster and this whole business of this jaunt that 15 mps went on out to gibraltar to see how the armed forces work. fairly standard thing for mps to do these kinds of things, to work out how different sectors work. it seems it got a bit lively with a trio of them and you have been reporting that there was a couple military chaperones on this plane. that's right, this thing called the armed forces parliamentary scheme, it's been running for years and a dozen or so mps every year take part in different bits and they go off and watch things happening. and this group were accompanied by these two military chaperones on the plane and on arrival in gibraltar, the military

chaperones were so worried about the behaviour and drinking of three of the mps on board that they let their bosses know back in london. we have talked to witnesses who were there, who have told us there was a lot of drinking. one witness told me they were extremely drunk and there was a whole sort of kerfuffle at the airport in gibraltar upon arrival. and this doesn't seem like, from this account of events, that it was people having a couple of beers on a flight, this seems like something that was much more serious than that. but it has prompted some pretty angry denials on the other side. it has. the three mps, we've got charlotte nicholls who is a labour mp, who had been drinking, wasn't in gibraltarfor very long, she has got some mental health concerns, she's got post—traumatic stress disorder, she had a mental health episode, as it has been described to me, not long after she got there, and came back. and that's that, and there has been no official response from labour. but the two snp mps, drew hendry and david linden,

there is a bit of a to do now. because they went on twitter straightaway and said this is all politics. didn't say they hadn't been drinking. but they did deny being drunk which is the central allegation. that's right and they have stayed on the trip and i think we can have a look at the picture of the armed forces parliamentary group out there on their trip to gibraltar. they get to put on combat fatigues which, i knew about these things but i didn't realise they got to kind of dress up and i don't say that in a dismissive sense but they are not members of the armed forces and it just seemed a bit weird. it is a slightly unusual thing, but it is a serious scheme and from talking to people about this trip, there was a real sense that, among others, real outrage because it is a serious thing. this is an important trip, on the time around armistice day, so for this kind of palaver to go on has really got some people's necks up. but as you said, surprise surprise, it has turned into a bit of a political row and even

the first minister, nicola sturgeon, today went on the record denying that her mps had got up to no good. they have made clear the allegations that have been made against them . are utterly false, i think- are a pretty disgraceful attempt by conservatives to divert attention from other things over the past- couple of days. i know david and drew extremely well and i have confidence in them - and in the account they have given. so the first minister is insistent that her colleagues were not in this state at all but the ministry of defence, and ben wallace, the defence secretary, must be very confident about the facts of this story because he hasn'tjust written to the snp and to labour, he has written letters to all sorts of people in the political system about this. that's right, he has written to the commons speaker, sir lindsay hoyle, he's also written to james gray, who is the mp who runs this armed forces parliamentary scheme. and, as i understand it, ben wallace is not asking for any

kind of sanction but the mod i think is deadly serious about this, they were trying to make it clear to the party leaders that this kind of behaviour, as alleged, is completely unacceptable. and what is striking that, yes, the context of this story is one where lots of parties are perhaps scratching around, seeing what other parties might have done after a week of headlines that have focused on the conservatives, but crucially, two, and they are not the only two, but two of the witnesses here were not party political, they were civil servants, or representatives of the ministry of defence accompanying these mps out there. we are getting into a bit of an arms race between all the partiesjust trying to find examples left, right and centre people not behaving themselves super well, but perhaps not doing stuff that is the end of the world? well, there was some chatter at westminster this morning about whether or not mps actually really wanted to open up a pandora's box about mps' behaviour on foreign trips. because from time to time you do

here quite sort of hair raising stories about the things that people have got up to, thinking they might be on an 18 to 30 trip rather than off on some professional fact finding mission. 60 to 70! exactly! for some. but i did hear somebody who was familiar with some of these trips talking about how sometimes mps were just a bit high and mighty, they hadn't always been as polite as they always should be. but i was also told today that one particular mp had gone on some trips around the world and always insisted that the itinerary included a visit to the local zoo. which i just thought it was a really strange thing. anyway, if you are listening to newscast, you probably know who you are. but anyway... that's for you, liz! listener liz! it has kind of been mps behaving badly week in a way but the issues around claims of corruption, second jobs, people breaking really strict standards rules, that is something really serious and we ended up with the sight

of the prime minister standing on stage yesterday, telling the world, look, i genuinely believe the uk is not corrupt and people in cop cannot possibly have conceived of hearing that when all those months ago there were thinking, oh, what kind of image and look do we want to give to the rest of the world? and whatever anyone�*s view on what has happened in the last week or so in terms of the revelation, a british prime minister volunteering that sentence out loud is extraordinary. because that word, corrupt, is a colossal one. it is. and i know it was thrown around by sir keir starmer, the labour leader, over the last weeks, and there was something there, if you like, for the prime minister to respond to. but it is just such a massive word. it really is and there is always a danger in politics, if you reuse your critic's accusation, you actually give some fuel to it rather than just cracking on, but there is no question here, borisjohnson has been privately slated by a lot of his mps for his handling of all of this and there's been some public criticism as well. also, chris, ithought your use of the word volunteer there to describe what the prime minister did

was actually a really accurate reflection of what it was like in that press conference yesterday which he did here in glasgow. he wasn't asked about something along these lines but he wasn't asked, do you think britain is a corrupt country or not? he started answering a much more generic question about the situation and then you could see a light bulb went on in his head and there was something he wanted to say but he hadn't said yet so he then came out with this line and so everybody stops typing their notes on their laptops and looked up to hear him say that. what i think is really interesting is that he hasn't come close to apologising for the government's handling about this, leading back to the owen paterson thing and the botched vote in the commons, but if you listen to the chancellor, rishi sunak, who was doing interviews this morning about the latest gdp figures, but he was inevitably asked about this, he sounded not necessarily apologetic but a lot more contrite than borisjohnson ever has. i'm not familiar with the specific details of that case, _ it would not be right for me to comment on individuals. j reflecting on all of these things over recent days, i what i can say is that for us - as a government, we need to do

better than we did last. week, and we know that. that, a reference i think specifically to sir geoffrey cox and his whereabouts over, well, a good chunk of the last few months. still no sign of him, his commons office was all locked up with the lights off when i went and had a peek yesterday. you always think, back in the day, compiling cvs and that little bit about extracurricular activities where you say, i don't know, abseiling! netball! exactly! orienteering. and it's fair to say that that chunk of sir geoffrey's cv is rather extensive and well remunerated! i'm not sitting here on my own because listening to all of that was the shadow business secretary, and i have to say, a bit of a cop aficionado because he has been here the whole time and been very visible, it is ed miliband. hello. i confess! not that i need to confess because people knew it anyway but... you are loving it, i have seen you walking around like you're on cloud nine the whole time you've been here. cloud cop!

there are certain, they are an experience, aren't they? yes, we will talk about cop at length in a minute, not too much length, just the right length, but this whole thing we are calling standards this week, is this now affecting all parties? you would have been loving it a few days ago when it seemed to be a tory issue but it's now the snp and labour being dragged into a behavioural thing as well. i think there are lots of different things going on, i don't know what happened on that flight but people should behave themselves on flights, but i don't know exactly what happened. the fundamental issue here is our mps focused on working for the people who elect them, their constituents, and are we upholding proper standards of integrity? this all dates back to 0wen paterson the fact that the prime minister decided to rip up the rules and decided to effectively sack the referee orjust decided he would not accept the referee's verdict. this is where it all began. i think there is going to have to be

changed, though it's notjust about 0wen paterson or geoffrey cox, there is going to have to be change. lord evans said this morning that in 2018 they recommended a ban on consultancies for mps. i proposed in 2015, when i was a leader, that they should be a ban on directorships and consultancies, paid directorships and consultancies. i think we need to do that because we want to uphold the idea that mps are working, focused on their constituents, not for outside organisations they might be lobbying on behalf of. and we want to uphold that idea and it's like it needs to be seen that way as well. what keir starmer did any different to what geoffrey cox has done? the i'm to what geoffre cox has done? ., ., ~ ., but i'm not making anyjudgment on that but is it now that labour position that outside work consultancies should be all ended or what is it? because we've heard different things

from the labour party this week. and why is what keir starmer did as an mp any different to whatjeffrey cox is done? to setjeffrey cox is being paid more? the is done? to set jeffrey cox is being paid more?— paid more? the history of this is that in 2015| — paid more? the history of this is that in 2015| said _ paid more? the history of this is that in 2015| said that _ paid more? the history of this is that in 2015| said that we - paid more? the history of this is that in 20151 said that we should j that in 2015! said that we should -et that in 2015! said that we should get rid _ that in 2015! said that we should get rid of— that in 2015! said that we should get rid of paid consultancy. directorships and in 2019 we stood on a manifesto that said an end to second jobs apart from a few exceptions. i think we don't have to over that period is like deftly got jeffrey— over that period is like deftly got jeffrey cox earning £6 million, residing — jeffrey cox earning £6 million, residing in the caribbean and i think— residing in the caribbean and i think 10,000 hour somebodies calculated over the last ten years. a hundred — calculated over the last ten years. a hundred grand for winding down? that sounds extraordinary to so many peopia _ that sounds extraordinary to so many people. hang on, he got paid because he'd been _ people. hang on, he got paid because he'd been a _ people. hang on, he got paid because he'd been a barrister, he was coming into parliament, he was doing some work as_ into parliament, he was doing some work as a _ into parliament, he was doing some work as a barrister but look, i know

kier was _ work as a barrister but look, i know kier was absolutely focused on the job he _ kier was absolutely focused on the job he was— kier was absolutely focused on the job he was doing as an mp and thence subsequent— job he was doing as an mp and thence subsequent shadow secretary. he's given— subsequent shadow secretary. he's given up— subsequent shadow secretary. he's given up his licence to practice. right. — given up his licence to practice. right, let's talk about caulk. before we dive into the latest version what alice nerds are excited about will be able to sleep tonight because it's a new version come in the morning. is because it's a new version come in the morning-— the morning. is that the final thin ? the morning. is that the final thing? it's — the morning. is that the final thing? it's kinda _ the morning. is that the final thing? it's kinda like - the morning. is that the final thing? it's kinda like the - thing? it's kinda like the wraparound _ thing? it's kinda like the wraparound agreement. thing? it's kinda like the . wraparound agreement that thing? it's kinda like the _ wraparound agreement that contains the summary of all the stuff that's been decided as part of the cop26 process was up lots of complicated technical text below it. did you bring any gossip from the blue zone where the trucks are happening? here's my gossip, two years, this is slightly— here's my gossip, two years, this is slightly trivial, for two years i've been _ slightly trivial, for two years i've been saying to sharma that he should change _ been saying to sharma that he should change to _ been saying to sharma that he should change to no drama schama. today is some _ change to no drama schama. today is some people call me no drama schama. so elise _ some people call me no drama schama. so elise is _ some people call me no drama schama. so elise is finally taken my advice on that— so elise is finally taken my advice on that score. but i think he does need _ on that score. but i think he does need to— on that score. but i think he does need to be — on that score. but i think he does

need to be high drama schama over the next _ need to be high drama schama over the next couple of days. that's my advice _ the next couple of days. that's my advice we — the next couple of days. that's my advice. we are not where we need to be in _ advice. we are not where we need to be in this— advice. we are not where we need to be in this summit. just to be super nerdy— be in this summit. just to be super nerdy for— be in this summit. just to be super nerdy for a — be in this summit. just to be super nerdy for a minute, we know with the task was— nerdy for a minute, we know with the task was which is to have global emissions — task was which is to have global emissions by 2030. that is a reduction _ emissions by 2030. that is a reduction in each of budget off of this, _ reduction in each of budget off of this, that — reduction in each of budget off of this, that is a reduction of 28 billion— this, that is a reduction of 28 billion tonnes of omissions. we know with the _ billion tonnes of omissions. we know with the authority of you an estimate is that were at 4.8 billion tonnes— estimate is that were at 4.8 billion tonnes was— estimate is that were at 4.8 billion tonnes was that were less than a fifth of— tonnes was that were less than a fifth of the — tonnes was that were less than a fifth of the way of where we need to be. fifth of the way of where we need to be so— fifth of the way of where we need to be so what — fifth of the way of where we need to be. so what does this mean for what we need _ be. so what does this mean for what we need in _ be. so what does this mean for what we need in these final hours of cop26? — we need in these final hours of cop26? at the very least we need a mandate to — cop26? at the very least we need a mandate to come back in a year's time _ mandate to come back in a year's time to— mandate to come back in a year's time to close that gap. at the moment— time to close that gap. at the moment we got quite a week text on what exactly negotiators are supposed to do. just so people know this may— supposed to do. just so people know this may be — supposed to do. just so people know this may be but the paris agreement

2015 said _ this may be but the paris agreement 2015 said we aim for well below 2 degrees — 2015 said we aim for well below 2 degrees warmer warming and efforts to 15 _ degrees warmer warming and efforts to 1.5. there is a realambiguity in the text — to 1.5. there is a realambiguity in the text. that's something that's -ot the text. that's something that's got to— the text. that's something that's got to be — the text. that's something that's got to be delivered. we've got to finally— got to be delivered. we've got to finally deliver for developing countries this hundred billion dollars— countries this hundred billion dollars that was promised in copenhagen when i was climate change secretary, _ copenhagen when i was climate change secretary, gordon brown was a minister, — secretary, gordon brown was a minister, still not delivered in the final days — minister, still not delivered in the final days of this cop. there are other— final days of this cop. there are other things that are important too. i other things that are important too. i don't _ other things that are important too. i don't want — other things that are important too. i don't want to be the gloom merchant, but i fear will not where we need _ merchant, but i fear will not where we need to— merchant, but i fear will not where we need to be. i merchant, but i fear will not where we need to be— we need to be. ijust don't get if we need to be. i 'ust don't get if we had a labour— we need to be. ijust don't get if we had a labour government - we need to be. ijust don't get if| we had a labour government and we need to be. ijust don't get if- we had a labour government and this cop was being held over labour government and you were the cops secretary, you'd be the cop president, it would be no drama miliband. we come up with a different one. how would you have got china to reduce its omissions by more and also come up with an, and also get america to stop up tens of

millions more dollars?— millions more dollars? you're completely — millions more dollars? you're completely right _ millions more dollars? you're completely right about - millions more dollars? you're completely right about this. l millions more dollars? you're - completely right about this. here's what hasn't happened in this cop. two years— what hasn't happened in this cop. two years ago it should've been, when _ two years ago it should've been, when nerds — two years ago it should've been, when nerds like me would talk about this massive gap in omissions that what _ this massive gap in omissions that what we _ this massive gap in omissions that what we needed to do was done in paris _ what we needed to do was done in paris and — what we needed to do was done in paris and that's to have the alliance _ paris and that's to have the alliance of developing up countries and one _ alliance of developing up countries and one hand and ambitious developed countries _ and one hand and ambitious developed countries like ours on the other to put pressure to form a picture movement to form the bigger emitters like china _ movement to form the bigger emitters like china and the united states. what _ like china and the united states. what will— like china and the united states. what will we do differently for cop in sharm — what will we do differently for cop in sharm el—sheikh? you've got to deliver here, that's why delivering here matters notjust morally, yotr've — here matters notjust morally, yotr've got _ here matters notjust morally, you've got to deliver here on the hundred — you've got to deliver here on the hundred billion for adaptation and then you've got to form the strongest alliance you can to put pressure — strongest alliance you can to put pressure on all the big emitters. it's pressure on all the big emitters. it's really— pressure on all the big emitters. it's really hard. i don't want to pretend — it's really hard. i don't want to pretend it's easy, of course it isn't — pretend it's easy, of course it isn't but _ pretend it's easy, of course it isn't but that's what you've got to do to— isn't but that's what you've got to do to move — isn't but that's what you've got to do to move the dial in what is a fantastically difficult thing. ed, ou've fantastically difficult thing. ed, you've talked _ fantastically difficult thing. ec you've talked about being on cloud

cop not to sing glasgow but is it too late — you talk about being gloomy, were talking about this on thursday night, so often with these things also to international summits the big breakthrough comes in the final hours or even if the extra time, injury time, call it what you like. could something still come that makes you rather less gloomy? my that makes you rather less gloomy? my prediction is will we get an agreement, we will hopefully protect the agreement that says we will phase _ the agreement that says we will phase out fossil fuel subsidy. i hope _ phase out fossil fuel subsidy. i hope we — phase out fossil fuel subsidy. i hope we will deliver from the developing world and away we haven't so far— developing world and away we haven't so far in— developing world and away we haven't so far in this _ developing world and away we haven't so far in this cop. if i was to pretend _ so far in this cop. if i was to pretend to _ so far in this cop. if i was to pretend to you that we were suddenly --oin pretend to you that we were suddenly going to _ pretend to you that we were suddenly going to go from being way off helping emissions and suddenly all these _ helping emissions and suddenly all these countries in a come forward with new— these countries in a come forward with new pledges for 2030, that's not the _ with new pledges for 2030, that's not the realms of what can happen. the leaders — not the realms of what can happen. the leaders came, they made their

statements, they made their announcements. though we are going to be short _ announcements. though we are going to be short on the science, we can be very— to be short on the science, we can be very short _ to be short on the science, we can be very short on the science. and we are going _ be very short on the science. and we are going to— be very short on the science. and we are going to have to have a herculean effort in the coming year to try— herculean effort in the coming year to try and _ herculean effort in the coming year to try and close that ambition gap. what _ to try and close that ambition gap. what you _ to try and close that ambition gap. what you have to get tough with major _ what you have to get tough with major emitters. so australia, we do in a trade _ major emitters. so australia, we do in a trade deal with australia at the moment. apparently we have agreed _ the moment. apparently we have agreed to— the moment. apparently we have agreed to take out these commitments on temperatures to 1.5 degrees and so on _ on temperatures to 1.5 degrees and so on we _ on temperatures to 1.5 degrees and so on. we can't carry on doing trade deals— so on. we can't carry on doing trade deals where — so on. we can't carry on doing trade deals where we say, climate is extra — deals where we say, climate is extra. ,, ,, deals where we say, climate is extra. , ., ,, ., extra. do you think the government is been a bit — extra. do you think the government is been a bit nifty _ extra. do you think the government is been a bit nifty here? _ extra. do you think the government is been a bit nifty here? they've - is been a bit nifty here? they've done lots of side deals are allowed lots of side deals to happen, they've been involved in them like deforestation on methane, the latest greenhouse gas after carbon gas was up greenhouse gas after carbon gas was up on cars, there's a whole separate thing about money the bank of england been doing. actually those are all things that would be very hard to achieve within the cop process because you got hundred 97

people who are gay to argue and never agree. people who are gay to argue and neveragree. instead people who are gay to argue and never agree. instead they've carved out things where you can get different coalitions of people. it is not quite a smart move because that gets progress in areas and vices that would have progress otherwise?— vices that would have progress otherwise? , ., , ., , otherwise? yes, and its modest rouress otherwise? yes, and its modest progress the — otherwise? yes, and its modest progress the problem _ otherwise? yes, and its modest progress the problem is - otherwise? yes, and its modest progress the problem is been i otherwise? yes, and its modest - progress the problem is been dressed up progress the problem is been dressed up as transformation and it is an transformation. it is been massively overs _ transformation. it is been massively overs spun — transformation. it is been massively overs spun. the hundred and 90 countries — overs spun. the hundred and 90 countries on cold turned out to be 13 new _ countries on cold turned out to be 13 new countries that actually use coal~ _ 13 new countries that actually use coal~ and — 13 new countries that actually use coal. and two of them poland and south _ coal. and two of them poland and south korea's hang on, we can sign up south korea's hang on, we can sign up to— south korea's hang on, we can sign up to this _ south korea's hang on, we can sign up to this and we signed up to something very different. they see themselves — something very different. they see themselves as _ something very different. they see themselves as developing - something very different. they see i themselves as developing countries. exactly. i absolutely don't deny that those things have a role was up but i that those things have a role was up but i think— that those things have a role was up but i think the government believed its own— but i think the government believed its own slogan of cash, cars, trees and coal— its own slogan of cash, cars, trees and coal that that would sort the omissions — and coal that that would sort the omissions gap. there was a report again— omissions gap. there was a report again today— omissions gap. there was a report again today which said it makes a difference — again today which said it makes a difference but it's a pretty marginal difference to the omissions -ap. marginal difference to the omissions gap there _ marginal difference to the omissions gap. there was a report again today which _ gap. there was a report again today which said _ gap. there was a report again today which said it — gap. there was a report again today which said it makes a difference but it's a _ which said it makes a difference but it's a pretty— which said it makes a difference but it's a pretty marginal difference to

this 2030 — it's a pretty marginal difference to this 2030 question. this is really hard _ this 2030 question. this is really hard. ,., ., , this 2030 question. this is really hard. . , ' hard. the if so many different asects hard. the if so many different aspects different _ hard. the if so many different aspects different countries, . aspects different countries, different ways of looking at the size different things can do. finally, help us tonight to try to sum up where this might all end up. you are a label politician but you are also an expert in this field. the government central task, they publicly set themselves was to keep the possibility of limiting the rise in global temperature to one and a half degrees celsius, keep 1.5 alive was boris johnson's half degrees celsius, keep 1.5 alive was borisjohnson's mantra. what are the chances in your view by the end of tomorrow of the early hours of saturday whenever it is actually all finishes, what are the chances that it will be credible to say the chances of limiting global temperatures to one and a half degrees is within our reach? i temperatures to one and a half degrees is within our reach? i think the best, fairest _ degrees is within our reach? i think the best, fairest way _ degrees is within our reach? i think the best, fairest way to _ degrees is within our reach? i think the best, fairest way to describe i the best, fairest way to describe this as _ the best, fairest way to describe this as we — the best, fairest way to describe this as we stand tonight is this is modest — this as we stand tonight is this is modest progress, the summit. but

modest _ modest progress, the summit. but modest progress, the summit. but modest progress is not nearly enough -iven modest progress is not nearly enough given the _ modest progress is not nearly enough given the emergency we face. and 1.5 at the _ given the emergency we face. and 1.5 at the end _ given the emergency we face. and 1.5 at the end of— given the emergency we face. and 1.5 at the end of the summit will be in mortal— at the end of the summit will be in mortal danger. and it doesn't mean is said. _ mortal danger. and it doesn't mean is said. if— mortal danger. and it doesn't mean is said. if we— mortal danger. and it doesn't mean is said, if we come back in 2025 then— is said, if we come back in 2025 then it — is said, if we come back in 2025 then it will— is said, if we come back in 2025 then it will be very, very serious but very— then it will be very, very serious but very bad. assuming we come back next year— but very bad. assuming we come back next year it— but very bad. assuming we come back next year it will be mortal danger in the _ next year it will be mortal danger in the world is going to have to act with much. — in the world is going to have to act with much, much greater urgency if we can— with much, much greater urgency if we can keep — with much, much greater urgency if we can keep it alive.— we can keep it alive. what's happened — we can keep it alive. what's happened in _ we can keep it alive. what's happened in the _ we can keep it alive. what's happened in the last - we can keep it alive. what's happened in the last 24 - we can keep it alive. what's l happened in the last 24 hours we can keep it alive. what's - happened in the last 24 hours as i picked up some merge which it is done too. everyone gets a cop refillable, reusable water bottle. and i had to buy a whole bunch today because i'm starting to fill up my new cop binder.— because i'm starting to fill up my new cop binder. hang on a minute. i thou~ht new cop binder. hang on a minute. i thought you — new cop binder. hang on a minute. i thought you were — new cop binder. hang on a minute. i thought you were allowed _ new cop binder. hang on a minute. i thought you were allowed to - new cop binder. hang on a minute. i thought you were allowed to have i thought you were allowed to have paper? what are you doing using up the forest by printing of documents? it's for the good of humanity. also got dave and adam attenborough themed socks. toes and planet they

say. themed socks. toes and planet they sa . �* ., ., ,., and say. i've got the water bottle. and it started raining. _ say. i've got the water bottle. and it started raining. so _ say. i've got the water bottle. and it started raining. so were - say. i've got the water bottle. and it started raining. so were having l it started raining. so were having the proper glasgow experience. just as the conference draws to a close the climates get better two other ideas. ., , ., , the climates get better two other ideas. . , ., , ., ideas. can i give you my line from the co - ? ideas. can i give you my line from the cop? please _ ideas. can i give you my line from the cop? please do. _ ideas. can i give you my line from the cop? please do. i _ ideas. can i give you my line from the cop? please do. i was - ideas. can i give you my line from the cop? please do. i was on - ideas. can i give you my line from the cop? please do. i was on the | the cop? please do. i was on the trays _ the cop? please do. i was on the trays to— the cop? please do. i was on the trays to session relatively early in the morning and jim said how is the cop going _ the morning and jim said how is the cop going and i said i'm not sure, had to— cop going and i said i'm not sure, had to say— cop going and i said i'm not sure, had to say the states. and he said cop26. _ had to say the states. and he said cop26, clues in the name, dave tried 25 times _ cop26, clues in the name, dave tried 25 times before and they failed. i think— 25 times before and they failed. i think that's a bit of a gloomy note to end _ think that's a bit of a gloomy note to end on — think that's a bit of a gloomy note to end on but... thanks mr optimism. they haven't — to end on but... thanks mr optimism. they haven't succeeded i think he probably— they haven't succeeded i think he probably said. anyway, will come back at— probably said. anyway, will come back at the — probably said. anyway, will come back at the top 27 for the good news they announce a cop 27 is can be in egypt _ they announce a cop 27 is can be in egypt and — they announce a cop 27 is can be in egypt and cop 28 is to be in the bible _ egypt and cop 28 is to be in the bible to— egypt and cop 28 is to be in the bible to and from me it's cop out.

by, everybody. bible to and from me it's cop out. by. everybody-— hello there. though weekends not looking bad at all for most of us. it's going to be mild, fairamount of all for most of us. it's going to be mild, fair amount of cloud i think but some of us will have some decent spells of sunshine. let's have a look at the here now and skies have cleared in some spots across scotland, central and southern scotland, central and southern scotland and a few areas for the cell generally a lot of cloud to start the day for the really mild, look at these temperatures, to start the day for the really mild, look at these temperatures, 10 or 11 degrees, this time of year, early in the morning should be closer to around 5 degrees. so we are well above the average. it can be mild by day two. the best chances sunshine

across central areas of the uk, certainly southern scotland, the lake district, lancashire, parts of the midlands. 14 top temperature in london, we match that in belfast. scotland will be closer to 11 or 12. how about the outlook was? remember sunday, not much change, not much change on monday, tuesday, wednesday.

tonight at ten, here in glasgow, the climate talks go on, well past their official end, but is a breakthrough possible? climate activists have been piling on the pressure, and with negotiations set to continue into the night, the president of the summit calls for one last push to reach a deal. now we need that final injection of that can—do spirit

which is present at this cop so that we get this shared