president vladimir putin has made the decision to invade ukraine — with an attack on kyiv expected in the coming days. mr biden said the united states and its allies would stand together in full support of the people of ukraine. nine people have been killed as storm eunice left a trail of destruction across parts of northern europe. deaths were reported in the netherlands, belgium, britain and ireland — many of the victims crushed by falling trees. gusts of close to two—hundred kilometres an hour have been recorded. the former us police officer who killed a black motorist when she confused her handgun for her taser has been sentenced to two years in prison — a penalty below the state guidelines. kim potter had been convicted of first degree manslaughter for fatally shooting daunte wright last april. now on bbc news, it's

time for the media show. hello. if you really want to know how much power our newspapers have, you need to go to the top. and on today's media show where with a man who's been at the heart of fleet street for decades. john witherow is one of the longest—serving national newspaper editors first at the sunday times and now the times. under him those papers have exposed cash for honors, corruption of oxfam, abused that brought the room and much more. so at a time when the prime minister is fighting for his political life after a series of scoops that could still bring him down, what does the editor of the times make of it all and how does he explain the relationship towards the press and the people in power? and with first a new radio station, times radio and now in upcoming tv station, is the organisation he leads set on taking down the bbc? john witherow, welcome to the the media show —

for the first time. and i'd like to get a sense from you, as we start about your media habits. what do you listen to in the morning? i imagine you were once fully a today programme person but now you are loyal to times radio? no, i listen to the today programme and times radio. because it's important to see what both are doing. and what about tv, your news channel choice? generally, the bbc but i admire itm as well. and do you still read physical newspapers or are you now an app devoted? i am a bit of both. i do read print at home, a few newspapers in print but that i read the rest digitally. let's start, let's turn to how you ended up as one of the most seniorfigures in fleet street. you were born in south africa and moved to the uk as a child. what was it that drove you to become a journalist in the first place? well, when i was 19 i went to what was then southwest africa to work as a volunteer teacher. i was meant to go up

to the border — angola but the authorities then with south africa, they govern southwest africa, now namibia. so i couldn't go up and teach there so i set up a library in the capital. while i was there one of the people i was working with got expelled by the south africans. and he was a stringer for the bbc world service and bbc africa service. hejust handed it to me. i knew nothing about journalism. the only thing i knew was what my father told me, dog bites man is not a story, mann bites dogs is a story. man bites dogs is a story. i had to learn very fast doing broad casts, i think i was terrible, they were really nice at the world service and they encouraged me and so i did a series of interviews and told them what was going on in southwest africa, which was a really interesting time. because as i say, it was apartheid on steroids. it had a large africana and german population who were very hard line. it was a very difficult time

and the people i was working with, three of them got expelled, two of them were put under arrest in south africa. so we were seen as a kind of hot bed of anti—apartheid. but it was a really fast learning curve and that's when i really got the bug. and from the beginning of your career and then from there you focused on foreign reporting. you covered the iranian embassy siege in your first week, i think. then the iran, iraq and falklands wars. it is a foreign news really where your heart lies? no, it was then. by the way, i was a terrible war reporter. why? but i seemed to be sent to all these wars. what made with terrible war reporter? i tried to cover the wars in a kind of objective way, particularly the falklands. max hastings was there and he understood no, you had to do and in the way the british want to read about it. i was still applying old reuters rules which is nonsense. and max hastings outgunned all of us then. so it was a fantastic

experience. then i did. i got better at it. but i wasn't a natural war reporter like anthony loyd, who we have now who is totally outstanding. or marie colvin, who of course, got killed a decade ago. a decade this month. but i liked foreign news because i did start out at reuters and worked in madrid for about a year. but once i came... i was on the foreign desk at the sunday times for quite a while but then i moved onto home news with all—news interest me but foreign is obviously very important. you're clearly a natural at being the editor, you've been the editor for the sunday times from 1995 then the times in 2013, how would you describe your editor style? pretty direct. i hope that i give clear direction. i thought it was very important at the times that we had to take a much more constructive attitude towards news.

one thing i've seen over the years is that you read the media, newspapers in particular and they portray a very negative image of what's going on in the world. so people, i think there is one of the reasons is less trust because people look at their own lives and see generally things are getting better, and i mean a generalisation, things are getting better but that's not what they see in the media where everything looks like it's going to hell in a hand cart. i think it's important that the times starts doing more constructive news. journalists will often have a story that's 80% positive in 20% negative. and the kneejerk reaction ofjournalist, probably including me at one state as you go to the negative because it gives you a better headline. but in fact, the story is generally positive. we want to turn that around and make news reflect the world more accurately because the world is getting better. people are living longer, diseases on retreat, violence is down over the decades but people don't realise that.

if you read the newspaper you think everything is getting worse, it's not. and we want to change our direction. and in terms of how far you would push yourjournalists to bring in stories, people told me that you rule by fear and they're afraid of you. well, they shouldn't. .. i heard that i don't believe it. they shouldn't be, i don't think i'm a fearful person at all. i believe in being direct with people. is it your way of ensuring that yourjournalists bring in scoops, you need to put pressure on them. yeah, i think everybody needs scoops, exclusives are central to all publications. without them you're just reporting the mass out there. we have to differentiate ourselves. what we see on digital is, when you have exclusives, people really engage much more and i admire the paper doing for that. we've had a string of real exclusive over

the years and that's what people remember. they don't remember the day today run—of—the—mill stop. they admire the times if it covers something like covid thoroughly and responsibly which i think we have done. but you need scoops to lift yourself above the run—of—the—mill. i guess when it comes to scoops, right now the biggest scoops are all around politics, or more specifically politics and parties during covid lockdown. i'm sure the audience will be interested to know, what is your relationship with borisjohnson? i noticed that you had him on times radio, the first interview with the prime minister that morning. yes, that was great to get. we have contact with him. i don't think he's a particular admirer of the times, we've been pretty critical. i think boris was a great campaigner, i'm not sure he's a great governor. and you see what's happening now, evidence of the chaos in downing street which he's trying to sort out. he is of course in considerable personal danger of remaining prime minister and will have to wait

and see how that plays out. is it right that you play tennis with borisjohnson and other members of the family? i think of only play once with boris but i played with his brotherjoe and his sister rachel. any good? yeah, they�* re good. you? adequate. when did you last visit downing street? a couple of months ago, i think. does it happen often? no. how often? not very often. maybe a couple of times a year, i might speak to him and other ministers on the phone. and is that fairly common? how often would an editor of the times someone with good connection speak to the prime minister on the phone? not very often, it depends on what comes up. sometimes he's complaining. other times he wants us to tell him what's going on. what's useful about speaking to the prime minister and other politicians, not really what they tell you because you discover they're telling exactly the same on the bbc the next day. it's really what's on their mind, the preoccupations. and you learn from the subject they raise what's really concerning them. and that's quite valuable.

the information you get from them isn't. what does he ring to complain about? famously, we did a story saying he was going to get rid of his dog. which i think might have been planted by dominic cummings who wanted to get rid of the dog. this greatly upset the prime minister and carrie and he rang up to complain about that story of all things. anything more serious that he complains about? sometimes coverage, really it's more nonspecific. and when the prime minister calls, do you feel under pressure, it's the prime minister, does it impact what you do? no. and do you speak to him more than you spoke to other prime ministers, teresa may for example? no, about the same. under your watch sunday times broke the story with cash for honours story with allegations of donors to political parties being rewarded. there've been many scoops sense. why didn't you break partygate? would've loved to. it was a good scoop, that one.

lots of stories i would love to have broken. i think the fte, cameron greensill, thought was a good story. it's interesting because pa rtygate, very few journalists, lots of parties going on a very few journalist knew about it. you had it on your lap in a sense because on saturday, 20th 2020 the times published the story of the political editor, the policy editor and said borisjohnson celebrated his 56th birthday yesterday with a small gathering in the cabinet room, rishi sunak and a group of aides sang him happy birthday before they tucked into a unionjack cake. so back then you had what then became a huge story, how could you print it without realising it was incendiary? we missed it. what you think about that now? it's embarrassing. had you heard about parties at downing street before the mirror and itv publishers scoops? no, not from that when you mention. in that sense, you've heard of it but not recognised it as a party. i don't we put together, at that time that it was clashing at that time exactly with the instructions

of the government. i think that's what happened, that's why we didn't spot it. and when you saw the video, when you saw it emerging, i always ask people how they feel when someone else gets the scoop. how did it feel? oh, sick. clearly these revelations have been damaging for the prime minister, whether terminal is stil up in the air. do you think he will be prime minister by the end of the year? it's really hard to predict that. he is a survivor. i happen to know david cameron has a bet on it, an expensive dinner that boris will survive the year. so the former prime minister thinks that. a bet with who? i don't know. not with you? no. it's really hard to predict at this stage how the police inquiry will go and what the sue gray report will actually say. and how the party feels i think he's great advantages, they can't agree on who will succeed him. he is a fighter. i don't think

you give up easily. i guess our audience will be very interested in how powerful is the times, if you want to do could you bring borisjohnson down? only through a story that was shocking and that people thought was absolutely unacceptable. you couldn't do it any other way. if we were campaigning that he should go, i don't think that would make any difference, for example. it's the actual stories that change public opinion and the tory parties views. could it also be more subtle than that? if you decided for example, if you backed rishi sunak tomorrow and you did it subtly, so you just started writing articles that painted him in a positive light. do you think that that would swing it? no. and would you do that? no, not at this stage. there could be a stage where you might switch allegiance? yeah, maybe. what would it take? i don't know, we have to see. do you plan to do it anytime soon. we will have to see. interesting, interesting.

do you think papers can do that, can bring people down? it used to be the case that that was an understanding, that newspapers could if they chose to bring down politicians. stories can. i don't think a paper like the times can because we don't campaign overtly, we don't roll against a politician. you may find a paper like the mail or the sun can be much more vehement and vitriolic against a leader than we can. i think our readers like that and they want us to present the news, for them to make up their own minds not for us to tell them what to think. you have a columnist whose wife allegra stratton was central in the partygate story early on, just to remind the audience, she was downing street press secretary and she resigned after a leaked video showing her being asked about a now infamous cheese and wine event during lockdown.

what conversations were you having with him at the time and was it uncomfortable for you both that he was a personally involved in the story? i think was very upsetting to him what happened to her, she was clearly very upset. but the strength of james is notjust through allegra but through other sources. he has amazing contacts in government. he can tell readers what he thinks is going on and the general drift of the party, what ministers say. they'll talk to him extensively off the record and is very cosy with rishi sunak. and he's close with rishi sunak. he has a real insight, it's important papers give the readers a sense of what's happening through somebody who is incredibly well—connected. do you think that the story, partygate, what happened to his wife, has a change his attitude to the government and the way he writes about them? i don't know, i haven't asked him god. i don't know, i haven't asked him god-— i don't know, i haven't asked him god. ~ �* . ~ ., him god. we've talked about the revolvin: him god. we've talked about the revolving door _ him god. we've talked about the revolving door between - him god. we've talked about the revolving door between the - revolving door between the press and politicians. also work for a time here 2015

press and politicians. also work for a time here 20 15 for uk for that is a something uncomfortably cosy about the relationship between the press and politicians?— and politicians? the, there is source of _ and politicians? the, there is source of information - and politicians? the, there is source of information to - source of information to journalists which is valuable. because ministers wants to stay clear of special advisers that's useful. it seemed director of communications, if they are good are also valuable i don't think it's corrupting in any way or distorting. obviously, they're pushing me a message, it's thejob obviously, they're pushing me a message, it's the job of journalist to discern that and try and find the path through it to get to the truth. generally, they're pretty valuable, i'd say.- generally, they're pretty valuable, i'd say. but when a journalist _ valuable, i'd say. but when a journalist or— valuable, i'd say. but when a journalist or director - valuable, i'd say. but when a journalist or director of - journalist or director of communications comes to work for a newspaper presumably the newspaper is buying something from them, expertise, is it more than that, the access to power? more than that, the access to ower? a, , more than that, the access to ower? , �*,, , power? maybe but it's pretty transient as _ power? maybe but it's pretty transient as people - power? maybe but it's pretty transient as people move - power? maybe but it's pretty| transient as people move on. power? maybe but it's pretty i transient as people move on. if you hire them as a journalist you're hiring them for their skills as a journalist, not

necessarily for context they have. iiii necessarily for context they have. , ., . necessarily for context they have. ., ., have. if you are not hiring them is — have. if you are not hiring them is a _ have. if you are not hiring them is a journalist - have. if you are not hiring them is a journalist that's| them is a journalist that's different? yeah. obviously, everyone would understand that everyone would understand that everyone needs sources at the heart of government. that's what you're talking about how much of a mouth piece are you going to be, would you be happy for somebody, going to be, would you be happy forsomebody, one going to be, would you be happy for somebody, one of your journalist to be printing verbatim for something dominic's cummings was telling them? ~ . , them? well, dominic cummings tells everybody _ them? well, dominic cummings tells everybody what _ them? well, dominic cummings tells everybody what he - them? well, dominic cummings tells everybody what he thinks. l tells everybody what he thinks. and a lot gets printed verbatim. if you are getting good information on what's going on inside of number ten, that's valuable. and you would reported, it would have cummings influence on it. but if he was telling you what was happening, that's very useful. you allowed readers to balance against the other thing. other sources say that's not true, that's not it is, it is different for sub so you do it in the round. i different for sub so you do it in the round.— different for sub so you do it in the round. i suppose part of the problem — in the round. i suppose part of the problem is _ in the round. i suppose part of the problem is when _ in the round. i suppose part of the problem is when he - in the round. i suppose part of the problem is when he was i in the round. i suppose part ofj the problem is when he was at the problem is when he was at the heart of downing street he wasn't being quoted. he

the heart of downing street he wasn't being quoted.— wasn't being quoted. he was bein: wasn't being quoted. he was being quoted _ wasn't being quoted. he was being quoted but _ wasn't being quoted. he was being quoted but he - wasn't being quoted. he was being quoted but he was - being quoted but he was providing information. i’d being quoted but he was providing information. i'd like to turn to _ providing information. i'd like to turn to the _ providing information. i'd like to turn to the broader - providing information. i'd like. to turn to the broader question of rupert murdochs influence of the british media. the culture secretary is changing existing legislation to allow your boss to interfere in the times in the sunday times. nadine dori says it's not a murdochs financial interest to do so can you just explain why it wouldn't be?- you just explain why it wouldn't be? . ., �* , ., wouldn't be? yeah, that's not true what _ wouldn't be? yeah, that's not true what you _ wouldn't be? yeah, that's not true what you described. - wouldn't be? yeah, that's not true what you described. just| true what you described. just explain the undertaking, when he bought the titles in 1981 he gave undertakings the two titles that would remain separate. there was a real interest then that without digital media that we needed a plurality of opinions. and they didn't want the times and sunday times to merge. that's what's existed for a0 years. the anomaly was, this was a 20th—century decision that doesn't apply to the digital age, 21st century. the fact that the government could have some say on the free press is an anomaly. i think the

department of culture, media and sport excepted that, that we should be involved, you look after your own business, you have a level playing field with the other publishers so you are treated the same. so they've agreed to these undertakings to be removed from their influence. the undertakings remain there being put into our employment contracts and we are going to continue to have independent. it's exactly the same set up that with employment law governing and government. 50 employment law governing and government-— government. so the times and the sunday _ government. so the times and the sunday times _ government. so the times and the sunday times will - government. so the times and the sunday times will remain i the sunday times will remain separate? ibiiiii the sunday times will remain separate?— separate? bill remaining separate _ separate? bill remaining separate in _ separate? bill remaining separate in terms - separate? bill remaining separate in terms of - separate? bill remaining i separate in terms of editors separate? bill remaining - separate in terms of editors in key areas. we've already started merging parts of it. a lot of readers now read seven days with that we are trying to do that to avoid duplication and that would were made on thing so we don't repeat stories or cover the same ground. it'sjust stories or cover the same ground. it's just sensible. scenarios like sports and features where we agree on things. features where we agree on thins. , , ., , things. there will be people who say nadine _ things. there will be people who say nadine doris - things. there will be people who say nadine doris is - things. there will be people i who say nadine doris is wrong, they will argue that rupert

murdoch on freddie metals in our democracy and this decision could give him more power to do so. ~ ., , could give him more power to do 50, ~ ., , ., ., could give him more power to do so. . . , ., ., ., , could give him more power to do so. what is data that? is not true. so. what is data that? is not true- you — so. what is data that? is not true. you need _ so. what is data that? is not true. you need to _ so. what is data that? is notl true. you need to remember, with a whopping revolution, murdoch essentially save the press with a that enabled the other titles to become much more successful for that enabled the sunday times to become multi—sectioned and all newspapers to flourish. it was a very positive thing. it wasn't written about that at the time. some people will disagree with you. the print unions had _ disagree with you. the print unions had their— disagree with you. the print unions had their boot - disagree with you. the print unions had their boot on - disagree with you. the print | unions had their boot on our throats at the time. and that got rid of it and all the others followed suit. the fact is, he doesn't interfere, he doesn't interfere in the times or the sunday times of sensibility.— or the sunday times of sensibility. or the sunday times of sensibili . , ., ., sensibility. so it is a get on the phone _ sensibility. so it is a get on the phone and _ sensibility. so it is a get on the phone and talk- sensibility. so it is a get on the phone and talk to - sensibility. so it is a get on the phone and talk to you | sensibility. so it is a get on - the phone and talk to you about stories that are in the papers or... ? stories that are in the papers or... ., �* ., �*, or... ? no, i'll ask what's auoin or... ? no, i'll ask what's going on _ or... ? no, i'll ask what's going on what's _ or... ? no, i'll ask what's| going on what's happening or... ? no, i'll ask what's. going on what's happening in government and general things. he doesn't interfere. i give you a good example, one of the most important decisions that this country is taken in the

century was brexit. rupert murdoch was pro brexit and indeed the son was. but the times was per remain, sceptic lee pro remained but it argued that it was better to remain for economic reasons and better to be inside the tent than outside. , to be inside the tent than outside-— to be inside the tent than outside. , ., ., outside. did he get onto the -hone outside. did he get onto the phone about _ outside. did he get onto the phone about that _ outside. did he get onto the phone about that was - outside. did he get onto the phone about that was like i outside. did he get onto the| phone about that was like he accepted it. he phone about that was like he accepted it— accepted it. he said most of our readers _ accepted it. he said most of our readers are _ accepted it. he said most of our readers are per- accepted it. he said most of our readers are per remain, | our readers are per remain, most of the staff are pro remain a we need to reflect what we instinctively think you're right. do what we instinctively think you're right-— what we instinctively think you're right. do you tailor it all stories _ you're right. do you tailor it all stories to _ you're right. do you tailor it all stories to his _ you're right. do you tailor it all stories to his case, - you're right. do you tailor it all stories to his case, is . all stories to his case, is there any pressure on that front even if it's not coming from them to feel that you want to please the proprietor? ida. to please the proprietor? no, no not at _ to please the proprietor? no, no not at all. _ to please the proprietor? no, no not at all. what _ to please the proprietor? no, no not at all. what your - no not at all. what your personal _ no not at all. what your personal relationship i no not at all. what your l personal relationship with rupert murdoch, what's he like is an individual?— is an individual? he's kind of an mixture _ is an individual? he's kind of an mixture of _ is an individual? he's kind of an mixture of a _ is an individual? he's kind ofj an mixture of a businessman is an individual? he's kind of- an mixture of a businessman and an mixture of a businessman and a strong journalistic trait. he is very curious about things. his father was an editor and a fine journalist his father was an editor and a finejournalist in fine journalist in the gallipoli campaign. finejournalist in the gallipoli campaign. hejust gallipoli campaign. he just

curious, gallipoli campaign. hejust curious, he asked questions and a journalist would ask. his interest in politics, business, he's a bit of a political want, actually. i he's a bit of a political want, actuall . ., ., he's a bit of a political want, actually-— actually. i wonder how you managed _ actually. i wonder how you managed to _ actually. i wonder how you managed to work - actually. i wonder how you managed to work with - actually. i wonder how you managed to work with him j actually. i wonder how you i managed to work with him for actually. i wonder how you - managed to work with him for so long when other editors are coming on. long when other editors are coming on— long when other editors are cominu on. �* , coming on. i'm very lucky. one ofthe coming on. i'm very lucky. one of the thing — coming on. i'm very lucky. one of the thing doing _ coming on. i'm very lucky. one of the thing doing a _ coming on. i'm very lucky. one of the thing doing a few - coming on. i'm very lucky. one of the thing doing a few things| of the thing doing a few things i could do adequately is at it and i think he acknowledges that. i've been lucky that i've had the sunday times and then they times both set financially successful. and the times is now. and it gives you an enormous amount of strength that the paper is successful and it takes the pressure off and it takes the pressure off and management are much more positive and helping you, investing injournalism, investing injournalism, investing injournalism, investing in digital and all the key objectives was up and all the ways he's characterised as an outsider. i all the ways he's characterised as an outsider.— as an outsider. i wonder, in a sense the _ as an outsider. i wonder, in a sense the establishment, - as an outsider. i wonder, in a | sense the establishment, you even play tennis with the prime minister but you like murdoch see yourself as an outsider, do you think that? i see yourself as an outsider, do you think that?— you think that? i think “ournal should be i you think that? i think “ournal should be outsiders. _ you think that? i thinkjournal should be outsiders. we - you think that? i thinkjournal i should be outsiders. we should all be part of the establishment, we should always be critical when we think it's right. supportive if they do

the right things but generally we are critics and that's the right thing. we are critics and that's the right thing-— right thing. let's think now about some _ right thing. let's think now about some of _ right thing. let's think now about some of the - right thing. let's think now about some of the big - right thing. let's think now - about some of the big debates that are threatening to fragment the establishment put up fragment the establishment put up the times has taken a campaigning agenda particularly with turner's column and also general news coverage was that what your take on much of a? i5 what your take on much of a? is an explosive topic as you know. and the line has always been, we are sympathetic obviously to trans— people who are transitioning. and so we should be. what she has done is taken on the militants, the people who self—declared themselves. in many cases is women. and her drew it would not view it on women's right when they appear in public laboratories and changing rooms and sports and this is right. i back on that, i think it's the right approach. people get very, very angry about it. approach. people get very, very angry about it— angry about it. because those are ruite angry about it. because those are quite controversial -

angry about it. because those are quite controversial bluesl are quite controversial blues for many, for some. certainly when people hear this there will be complaints that you said that. do you get a lot of complaints from readers and indeed from campaign? we have had a lot of— indeed from campaign? we have had a lot of hostility. _ indeed from campaign? we have had a lot of hostility. with - had a lot of hostility. with tickets right thing. i think the vast majority of our readers agree with the point of view. is that what they say to you? view. is that what they say to ou? , ~ view. is that what they say to ou? , . ., , you? yes. we hear the terms culture wars _ you? yes. we hear the terms culture wars bandied - you? yes. we hear the terms culture wars bandied aroundl culture wars bandied around about a lot. clearly believed as being part of that are tied up as being part of that are tied up in maths. in your review to the culture wars exist because that yes, i think there is a generational gap going on. attitudes are changing. i was talking to a young man in his 20s who doesn't believe in a lot of these culture wars and i said, why don't you go out there and say those things? he says i can't. i'll be cancelled. it's so intolerant. and that's one of the problems i think we face now that we would as a newspaper encourage tolerance on all grounds. and

yet this is become an extremely vitriolic debate which is very unwelcome, i think. vitriolic debate which is very unwelcome, ithink.- vitriolic debate which is very unwelcome, ithink. unwelcome, i think. you mention bein: unwelcome, i think. you mention being cancel. _ unwelcome, i think. you mention being cancel, cancel— unwelcome, i think. you mention being cancel, cancel culture, - being cancel, cancel culture, what's your take on that? for example like thejimmy carter story, when that story reported in the time as it is, on the bbc, does a little part of you think, we are contributing to potentially cancelling someone or does it come into your mind are all? aha, or does it come into your mind are all? �* , , are all? a little bit but i think you _ are all? a little bit but i think you just _ are all? a little bit but i think you just report - are all? a little bit but i | think you just report the stories and people make up their own mind. i stories and people make up their own mind.— stories and people make up their own mind. i can ask you, how you _ their own mind. i can ask you, how you see — their own mind. i can ask you, how you see the _ their own mind. i can ask you, how you see the times - their own mind. i can ask you, how you see the times his - their own mind. i can ask you, | how you see the times his role in navigating all of this, navigating the culture wars. are you fighting culture wars are just reporting on them? are you fighting culture wars arejust reporting on them? we are 'ust reporting on them? we are just reporting on them? - are reporting on them but when we comment they take up positions within our reporting we should be as objective as possible. we should be as ob'ective as ossible. ~ we should be as ob'ective as “which possible. when it comes to render possible. when it comes to gender do _ possible. when it comes to gender do you _ possible. when it comes to gender do you believe - possible. when it comes to gender do you believe that| gender do you believe that broadly you reflect a broad spectrum? because you are under fire as opposed to having

janice turner, very hog profile at the paper and people complain and say there's not enough of the other side? we do reresent enough of the other side? we do represent the — enough of the other side? we do represent the other _ enough of the other side? we do represent the other side. - enough of the other side? we do represent the other side. maybe | represent the other side. maybe not as much is janice or as prominently. but she is taking on the militants. as i say, our readers support that. we've attracted women readers from other publications because of janice his stance.— other publications because of janice his stance. you've been editor of the _ janice his stance. you've been editor of the time _ janice his stance. you've been editor of the time for - janice his stance. you've been editor of the time for nine - editor of the time for nine years, you are at the sunday times for 18 years before that, just turned 70, happy birthday. are you planning to retire anytime soon? not unless i'm retired. i anytime soon? not unless i'm retired. ., anytime soon? not unless i'm retired-- i _ anytime soon? not unless i'm retired.- i decided - retired. i love it. i decided that? i love _ retired. i love it. i decided that? l love it. _ retired. i love it. i decided that? l love it. it's - retired. i love it. i decided that? i love it. it's an - that? i love it. it's an incredibly privileged job and every days different. i come in with a spring in my step taken, what can happen today and what will we report? i’m what can happen today and what will we report?— will we report? i'm incredibly luc to will we report? i'm incredibly lucky to do — will we report? i'm incredibly lucky to do the _ will we report? i'm incredibly lucky to do the job. - will we report? i'm incredibly lucky to do the job. how- will we report? i'm incrediblyl lucky to do the job. how many more prime minister do you think you see while you're editor? , , , ., ., ., editor? depends on how long boris editor? depends on how long itoris stays- _ editor? depends on how long boris stays. you're _ editor? depends on how long boris stays. you're a - editor? depends on how long boris stays. you're a giant. editor? depends on how long boris stays. you're a giant on fleet street, _ boris stays. you're a giant on fleet street, what _ boris stays. you're a giant on fleet street, what do - boris stays. you're a giant on fleet street, what do you - boris stays. you're a giant on i fleet street, what do you think your legacy will be? i

fleet street, what do you think your legacy will be?— your legacy will be? i hope we made the _ your legacy will be? i hope we made the times _ your legacy will be? i hope we made the times and _ your legacy will be? i hope we made the times and sunday i your legacy will be? i hope we - made the times and sunday times successful financially stable and good journalism. we have incredibly talented journalists and they will survive for another 200 plus years. that's another 200 plus years. that's a key objectives we are just guardians of these titles and we have to establish them to be successful for the future. thank you so much forjoining us today. thank you very much. for now, thanks for watching, goodbye. storm eunice is now sliding away and with the weather extremely so as we head through the weekend. the head through the weekend. weather remains unse1 if the weather remains unsettled if extremely so as we have through the weekend. most places getting off to a dry but cold and some thoughts icy on saturday. gales accompanying that weather feature around some southern and western coast, not as windy

as it was during friday foot up there will be spells of sunshine as well. temperatures north to south ranging from four in aberdeen to 11 degrees in cardiff as you go through saturday evening this first band of rain and some hills know will tend to weaken as it eases it way eastward. then we see some heavier rain pushing in from the west through the night with once again strengthening winds. temperatures will be coming up as the night wears on, mild air tied in with this weather system. sunday promises to be a windy day, not as windy as it has been but it could hamper some clear up operation, they'll be outbreaks of heavy rain and it will feel mild.

welcome to bbc news — i'm rich preston. our top stories... president biden says he's convinced vladimir putin has made the decision to invade ukraine — with an attack on kyiv expected in the coming days. storm eunice leaves a trail of death and destruction in the uk — and across northern europe. hello and welcome to bbc news. president biden is convinced russian president vladimir putin has made the decision to invade ukraine with an attack on the capital, kyiv, expected in the coming days. speaking in a television address mr biden said the united states and its allies in nato and across