the government is adamant that it cannot prevent all of the impact of a global shock to energy and food prices hitting british households. faisal islam, bbc news. the man accused of murdering the conservative mp sir david amess last october told police he'd committed an act of "terror". ali harbi ali, who's 26, denies charges of murder and preparing acts of terrorism. the jurors were shown body—camera footage of a confrontation between the suspect and two unarmed police officers, as our correspondent daniel sandford reports. armed only with batons, the first two police officers arriving at the church where sir david amess mp had been stabbed. they hesitate, but then decide to go in and confront the suspect.

drop the knife. drop the bleep knife now! on the floor now! get him down! right, search him. right, mate, at the moment, you are under arrest for murder, all right? at the police station, ali harbi ali explained his motivation. was it domestic or hate related? terror. pardon? terror. on what basis? racial, religious? religious. in the months before, he had several times visited the area around parliament and even the house of the cabinet minister michael gove. he denies charges of murder and preparing terrorist acts. daniel sandford, bbc news, at the old bailey. this weekend is oscars weekend in california, and this year netflix dominates the studios with no fewer than 27 nominations, including for the most prestigious award, that of best picture, for the power of the dog. the man who's turned netflix

from streaming giant to movie powerhouse is scott stuber. he's netflix's head of globalfilms and he's now one of the most powerful individuals in hollywood. in his first uk broadcast interview, he spoke to our culture editor katie razzall in los angeles. hollywood is changing, revolutionised by the streaming services which now dominate the oscars too. scott stuber is often described as the most important man in the business. the power of the dog, best picture, how are you feeling about it? i'm nervous. right, ithink, you know, whenever you've got a chance you're always nervous. 25 years since our first run together... netflix has 12 nominations — nearly half the total — for its period western the power of the dog. what will success look like for you? is it to win best picture? well, you'd love that. i think we're all going in that room, all the ten films that are nominated, with that hope and that dream. what matters whenever you're making film is can you make a film where the people involved can be considered best in class?

the preparations at la's dalton theatre are beginning for an awards that celebrate the best of the movies, but with more than 200 million subscribers to netflix alone the way we watch movies has changed dramatically since the oscars started more than 90 years ago. and with the streamers only offering short cinema release at best before their films are rolled out on the small screen, some accuse them of killing cinema. well, do pardon me. even the power of the dogs star benedict cumberbatch has complained about the impact on the big screen experience. you know, he criticised you and said he felt like he was working for the goliath that is killing david. i mean, you are a film lover... did he say that? yeah, i'm afraid he did. you know, and you're the film lover. surely in your heart you want longer release times in cinemas, you want people to see films like the power of the dog in the cinema? yeah, completely. and then you think about the audience on netflix. the size of the audience for that film is huge compared to what it would be. i want you to meet my cousin...

what stuber says matters. he's brought some of the world's biggest directors to netflix, including martin scorsese, who made the irishman, as well as alfonso cuaron and steven spielberg... you cannot go around saying to people that there's a100% chance that they're going to die. and big stars like meryl streep. don't look up is also nominated for best this year. do you think the way we'll watch movies will change? i mean, what will it look like in ten years and 50 years? you know, istill think the same, to be honest. i don't think there's a better version to watch a film than on a big screen, or on a big screen in your home. i don't think that those two things will change. i do think there are obviously people now who watch them on ipad or on a cell phone. does that offend you? if someone tells you they've watched... it bums me out a little bit but then i go, "well, that's their choice." what matters this week, though, is the oscars showdown in la, and the chance when it comes to best picture for netflix to prove it really does have all the power. katie razzall, bbc news, los angeles.

to football, and wales are just a game away from reaching the world cup finals for the first time in over 60 years. they beat austria 2—1 in a qualification play—off, and they'll now face either scotland or ukraine to reach the finals in qatar. italy will not be at those finals — they were beaten by north macedonia tonight. our correspondent hywel griffith reports from cardiff. they call themselves the red wall — welsh fans who have made this place a fortress for their team. before tonight, wales were unbeaten at home in 16 games, but few have compared to this. wales could face ukraine in the play—off final, but first they had to beat austria. the visitors could have spoilt the party early, piercing the defence and rattling welsh nerves. but then, ready to calm them, came the captain. commentator: it's bale... injust his third game in four months gareth bale showed he is still good enough

for the world stage. maybe the lack of games had made him greedy. bale once again with the midas touch. everything he does is turning to gold! dizzy with celebration, wales were wrong—footed. the deflection helped austria back into the game. danjames could have settled it... james... in the end wales were clinging on. but the red wall wasn't breached again. gareth bale had carried his nation forward. thanks to arguably the finest footballer ever to play in a welsh shirt wales are nowjust a game away from qualifying for the world cup for the first time in 64 years. hywel griffith, bbc news, cardiff. that's it. now on bbc one, time for the news where you are. have a very good night.

hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are miatta fahnbulleh, chief executive of the new economics foundation, and adam payne, political editor of politicshome. hi there to both of you, thanks for joining us. let's have a quick look at what we've got on the front pages at what we've got on the front pages at the moment. let's start with the telegraph, and the remarks made by president biden after a meeting of nato leaders in brussels. mr biden said that if russia were to use chemical weapons in ukraine, the us would respond, and "the nature of response will depend on the nature of the use". the guardian leads with the same story, and it has a photo of the g7 leaders as they arrived in brussels for the nato summit. the metro leads has the headline "kiss it goodbye", as the uk announces fresh sanctions on 65 more russian companies and individuals, including the stepdaughter

of russia's foreign minister, sergei lavrov. in the ft, the boss of p&o ferries admits to mps that a decision to sack 800 workers last week without unions consultation broke the law, but he insists he would do it again. leading on the same story, the yorkshire post says that unions have shared "serious" safety concerns following the sackings, suggesting that a lack of training for the replacement agency crew will mean "lives will be put in jeopardy". let us begin, and if i can begin with you in the guardian, the warning to putin over the use of chemical weapons. warning to putin over the use of chemicalweapons. president warning to putin over the use of chemical weapons. president biden said they would respond in kind — i think people are hoping he doesn't mean anyone will respond using chemical weapons, mean anyone will respond using chemicalweapons, but mean anyone will respond using chemical weapons, but that would mean there would be some kind of big response.

mean there would be some kind of big resonse. , , , , ., response. yes, this is definitely a toughening up. — response. yes, this is definitely a toughening up. i— response. yes, this is definitely a toughening up, i think, _ response. yes, this is definitely a toughening up, i think, of- response. yes, this is definitely a toughening up, i think, of some l response. yes, this is definitely a | toughening up, i think, of some of the language around how nato would respond. we are a month into this awful invasion, and i think the concern is that actually, russia might try to break the deadlock, break the ukrainian population by using weapons of mass destruction and chemical weapons. this is nato saying pretty firmly that there will be severe action. no we don't really know what that action is. i think biden didn't want to be drawn on whether there would be a military repercussions, ie troops on the ground and military response. but i think without going into that detail, it was the strongest language we've heard, that the response to be proportionate and severe. so i think it does the job of signalling without necessarily committing nato to any particular course of action at this point. find

course of action at this point. and we've seen _ course of action at this point. and we've seen this _ course of action at this point. and we've seen this red _ course of action at this point. and we've seen this red line crossed, haven't we, in syria in the past, where the us failed to act and the damage that that was seen to do, really. so it's not clear what the western response will be? it’s really. so it's not clear what the western response will be? it's not, and you're — western response will be? it's not, and you're right _ western response will be? it's not, and you're right that _ western response will be? it's not, and you're right that the _ western response will be? it's not, and you're right that the west - western response will be? it's not, and you're right that the west and l and you're right that the west and nato, _ and you're right that the west and nate, it's— and you're right that the west and nate, it's a — and you're right that the west and nato, it's a difficult position here because — nato, it's a difficult position here because obviously it has accused western— because obviously it has accused western leaders, including boris johnson, — western leaders, including boris johnson, who have admitted they were not hard _ johnson, who have admitted they were not hard enough and strong enough in response _ not hard enough and strong enough in response to _ not hard enough and strong enough in response to russia over to the annexation of crimea in 2014. so they— annexation of crimea in 2014. so they realised they have to be firm in response to russia if it does escalate — in response to russia if it does escalate further, its appalling attack — escalate further, its appalling attack on ukraine. but equally as you said. — attack on ukraine. but equally as you said, western leaders, and it was evidenced today in brussels, are refusing _ was evidenced today in brussels, are refusing at— was evidenced today in brussels, are refusing at the moment to detail what _ refusing at the moment to detail what their response would be if

vladimir— what their response would be if vladimir putin was to use chemical weapons — vladimir putin was to use chemical weapons. similarly president zelensky has been asking for several weeks _ zelensky has been asking for several weeks now— zelensky has been asking for several weeks now for western governments to enforce _ weeks now for western governments to enforce a _ weeks now for western governments to enforce a no—fly zone, to protect ukrainians— enforce a no—fly zone, to protect ukrainians on the ground from bombs and russian _ ukrainians on the ground from bombs and russian planes. however western countries _ and russian planes. however western countries have said we will not do that because that would involve shooting — that because that would involve shooting down russian planes, which would _ shooting down russian planes, which would drag _ shooting down russian planes, which would drag nato into a direct military— would drag nato into a direct military conflict with russia. so in brussels — military conflict with russia. so in brussels today, but we saw was western — brussels today, but we saw was western leaders, all of them asked repeatedly, "what would you do if putin _ repeatedly, "what would you do if putin escalates his invasion, his attack— putin escalates his invasion, his attack and — putin escalates his invasion, his attack and deploys chemical weapons?" we haven't got a specific answer— weapons?" we haven't got a specific answer on _ weapons?" we haven't got a specific answer on that. find weapons?�* we haven't got a specific answer on that.— answer on that. and i don't think we will, not at — answer on that. and i don't think we will, not at this _ answer on that. and i don't think we will, not at this point. _ answer on that. and i don't think we will, not at this point. let _ answer on that. and i don't think we will, not at this point. let me - will, not at this point. let me bring you the metro, because they have highlighted the woman who is

allegedly the stepdaughter of sergei lavrov, russian's foreign leader. his pictures were better pictures were on the website in the last few days, i think they've been taken down. but the sense action over what they say are putin's powells, we don't know if that'll lead to any sizeable difference. i don't know if that'll lead to any sizeable difference.— sizeable difference. i think in a world where _ sizeable difference. i think in a world where nato _ sizeable difference. i think in a world where nato is _ sizeable difference. i think in a world where nato is not - sizeable difference. i think in aj world where nato is not willing sizeable difference. i think in a i world where nato is not willing to engage in military action with russia, i think one of the levers they do have is economic sanctions, and if they can target particularly those sanctions at putin and the people around him, where it will hurt the most, quite frankly, then i think that is something they are willing to do. our government was slow off the mark, a couple weeks ago we were looking at the number of people being sanctioned, it was 200

and only a handful had been sanctioned after the invasion. but there's been a big step up, so i think they are about 1000 individuals and businesses that have now been sanctioned by the uk government, which i think is a big improvement, including the daughter of the russian foreign minister. so i think it is starting to try to squeeze in a way that will hopefully put discomfort and pressure on the people around putin. but whether it will in the end shift of them, given how in this they are now, i don't know. ., ~ how in this they are now, i don't know. . ,, , ., ., ., how in this they are now, i don't know. . ,, ., ., �*, how in this they are now, i don't know. . ,, ., ., a ., know. thank you for that. let's move awa from know. thank you for that. let's move away from ukraine _ know. thank you for that. let's move away from ukraine and _ know. thank you for that. let's move away from ukraine and come - know. thank you for that. let's move away from ukraine and come to - know. thank you for that. let's move away from ukraine and come to the l away from ukraine and come to the events of this week on the economic front, and on the telegraph — claims that rishi sunak is sometimes accused of — all chance of having smoke and mirrors to put their best foot forward, but has rishi sunak

gone too far this time and not done enough to help the poorest? i think what's it's ordinary _ enough to help the poorest? i think what's it's ordinary here _ enough to help the poorest? i think what's it's ordinary here is - enough to help the poorest? i think what's it's ordinary here is the - enough to help the poorest? i think what's it's ordinary here is the wayl what's it's ordinary here is the way in which _ what's it's ordinary here is the way in which rishi sunak first delivered his spring — in which rishi sunak first delivered his spring statement on wednesday, the immediate reaction from conservative mps was generally positive — conservative mps was generally positive. but then we saw the rather brutal _ positive. but then we saw the rather brutal set _ positive. but then we saw the rather brutal set of front pages, including from newspapers who were generally supportive _ from newspapers who were generally supportive of the conservative party last night, _ supportive of the conservative party last night, the mood, the positive move _ last night, the mood, the positive move around that spring statement has fallen— move around that spring statement has fallen apart very quickly. i guess— has fallen apart very quickly. i guess as — has fallen apart very quickly. i guess as you alluded to, the main charges _ guess as you alluded to, the main charges leveled against rishi sunak are that _ charges leveled against rishi sunak are that one, you claimed it to be a tax-cutting — are that one, you claimed it to be a tax—cutting chancellor, but over the next few _ tax—cutting chancellor, but over the next few years in this country, people — next few years in this country, people will be paying more taxes. and secondly, obviously this is a government which is committed to leveling _ government which is committed to leveling out, to helping people in the most — leveling out, to helping people in the most vulnerable households

across— the most vulnerable households across the country, but all the analysis— across the country, but all the analysis we heard overnight from think— analysis we heard overnight from think tanks pointed to a situation where _ think tanks pointed to a situation where the — think tanks pointed to a situation where the most vulnerable people will he _ where the most vulnerable people will be the hardest hit by this latest — will be the hardest hit by this latest set of economic measures. so the chancellor i think is in the most — the chancellor i think is in the most difficult moment, under the most _ most difficult moment, under the most pressure he's been in since entering — most pressure he's been in since entering thatjob. find most pressure he's been in since entering thatjob.— most pressure he's been in since entering that job. entering that “oh. and we've heard a lot entering that job. and we've heard a lot about those _ entering that job. and we've heard a lot about those who _ entering that job. and we've heard a lot about those who are _ entering that job. and we've heard a lot about those who are struggling i lot about those who are struggling the most and the fears people have going forward. people are already struggling right now, and it'll only get worse. at the telegraph today was writing about the fact that this is hitting the entire tory base because it is middle income earners, as well, the extent of the pain felt his vast. . ., , as well, the extent of the pain felt his vast. _,, ., . , , his vast. the cost of living crisis is bein: his vast. the cost of living crisis is being felt _ his vast. the cost of living crisis is being felt every _ his vast. the cost of living crisis is being felt every single - his vast. the cost of living crisis is being felt every single level. | is being felt every single level. the chancellor has been criticised from both sides— on the one hand,

there's a lot of pressure on him