hello, this is bbc news. we will be taking a look at tomorrow's papers in a moment. a military intelligence chief in kyiv says moscow may be attempting to split ukraine in two afterfailing to conquer the whole country. it comes as refugees fleeing from the southern city of mariupol say they are being forced to go to russia. as russia's offensive stalls, and civilian deaths continue to rise, the two sides agree to face—to—face talks in turkey on monday.

and walking it back: america's top diplomat says the country has no plans for regime change in russia after president biden said vladimir putin shouldn't be allowed to remain in power. in a special report we hear how sex traffickers are seeking to exploit ukraine's refugees fleeing the war. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me arejemma forte, the broadcaster and writer, and anna mikhailova, deputy political editor of the mail on sunday. these are say hello in a moment to both of them. tomorrow's front pages, starting with... the i headlines the suggestion from the ukrainian head of military intelligence

that russia is �*trying to split ukraine in two'. the guaridan has a similar headline and reports that leaders in the breakaway republics in eastern ukraine are planning referendums on their future status. the main story on the financial times is the diplomatic row around president biden�*s comments about president putin. it also reports on tight new restrictions being introduced in shanghai to combat a growing covid outbreak. joe biden�*s comments also feature on the telegraph — which reports on the growing backlash against the us president's calls for putin to go. �*putin out to starve us all�* is the headline on the metro — the paper reports on conditions in the beseiged ukrainian city of chernihiv. i think we are going to start with that story, the front page of the metro, that awful headline, putin out to starve us all. good to have you both. anna, could you talk us

through what this story is detailing? it through what this story is detailing?— through what this story is detailing? through what this story is detailin: ? , . ., detailing? it is a reminder that while there _ detailing? it is a reminder that while there has _ detailing? it is a reminder that while there has been _ detailing? it is a reminder that while there has been quite - detailing? it is a reminder that while there has been quite a i detailing? it is a reminder that | while there has been quite a lot detailing? it is a reminder that - while there has been quite a lot of focus over the last few days on the diplomatic and high—level talks. on the ground, people are really suffering and it continues to be a battle and there are claims from to resort to drinking sewage water and don't have enough food to eat. because the city is cut off as a result of the fighting and the invasion. a very sobering story for all of us to think about. for the politicians out there, they need to start thinking about coming to some kind of ending for the actual war.

we have talks in turkey next week starting on monday. we will see if and what they lead to, optimism isn't particularly high in many parts of ukraine on that. but it is important to remember the human elements here alongside all the geopolitical suggestions and strategies and actually, let's move to the front page of the i. russia is trying to split ukraine in two. that is the headline and we have been detailing a bit of that, but gemma, could you tell us what this is referring to?— is referring to? this does seem like a very new — is referring to? this does seem like a very new idea- — is referring to? this does seem like a very new idea. one _ is referring to? this does seem like a very new idea. one could - is referring to? this does seem like | a very new idea. one could interpret this as _ a very new idea. one could interpret this as perhaps the war hasn't gone as tooting — this as perhaps the war hasn't gone as tooting anticipated. the ukrainian resistance was underestimated and his army was overestimated. we have a situation where, _ overestimated. we have a situation where, a _ overestimated. we have a situation where, a month on, he hasn't achieved _ where, a month on, he hasn't achieved what he thought was going to happen _

achieved what he thought was going to happen very quickly. so perhaps this is— to happen very quickly. so perhaps this is his — to happen very quickly. so perhaps this is his new idea, which could look_ this is his new idea, which could look like — this is his new idea, which could look like a — this is his new idea, which could look like a result for him, but also saves _ look like a result for him, but also saves face — look like a result for him, but also saves face. so i suppose what he is proposing _ saves face. so i suppose what he is proposing something along the lines of south _ proposing something along the lines of south korea and north korea. none of south korea and north korea. none of this— of south korea and north korea. none of this has— of south korea and north korea. none of this has been agreed yet. it does sound _ of this has been agreed yet. it does sound like _ of this has been agreed yet. it does sound like president zelensky is at the point _ sound like president zelensky is at the point where there is definitely some _ the point where there is definitely some things to be negotiated that are on— some things to be negotiated that are on the — some things to be negotiated that are on the table. certainly he will not entertain any thoughts about denazifv — not entertain any thoughts about denazify in. he will not play into that propaganda. but it might be at a certain— that propaganda. but it might be at a certain point that president zelensky is open to russia certainly winning _ zelensky is open to russia certainly winning some parts of ukraine. anna, briefl and winning some parts of ukraine. anna, briefly and back, _ winning some parts of ukraine. anna, briefly and back, i _ winning some parts of ukraine. anna, briefly and back, i was _ winning some parts of ukraine. anna, briefly and back, i was looking - winning some parts of ukraine. fifi�*uas, briefly and back, i was looking back to how we get some kind of resolution here. are you optimistic these talks can lead to anything? it these talks can lead to anything? it depends what the end result we are

looking at. the donbas area was traditionally, before the actual war broke out, is what putin had in his sights. the area has been under constant fighting since 2014. it was a self—declared republic, but effectively a war zone where separatist ukrainian forces which are backed by russia and battle the ukrainian forces. this is assumed to have been the end game before the war broke out. an annexation, similar to crimea but a lot more bloody and well, a lot less to parts of ukraine, it is a chunk of the mainland. the intelligence chief he

suggested this option, he has actually said the next phase will be guerrilla warfare, which is what certainly in the uk senior politicians have been assuming from the start. first there will be the land war with russia trying to seize as much territory as possible. this is completely not how russia expected it to go because the ukrainian army have put up a very good fight. but at the start, i spoke with ben wallace on the second day of the war and he said the first invasion, rush it will try to seize as much territory as possible. the next stage will be much more difficult because it will descend into guerrilla warfare. that difficult because it will descend into guerrilla warfare.— difficult because it will descend into guerrilla warfare. that is the fear and reasons _ into guerrilla warfare. that is the fear and reasons for _ into guerrilla warfare. that is the

fear and reasons for the - into guerrilla warfare. that is the i fear and reasons for the pessimism impulse of ukraine that these talks could not lead to anything quickly resulting in a resolution and that is part of the frustration. we are going to leave ukraine, and the front page of the daily telegraph. not their main story but their second story and the headliners, free power for homes second story and the headliners, free powerfor homes near second story and the headliners, free power for homes near new nuclear plants to ease the path for planning approval. what is going... it seems like bribery, but gemma, what is going on here? this it seems like bribery, but gemma, what is going on here?— what is going on here? this has actually happened _ what is going on here? this has actually happened in _ what is going on here? this has actually happened in other - actually happened in other countries. we have moved away from ukraine _ countries. we have moved away from ukraine hut— countries. we have moved away from ukraine but it is linked in some way, _ ukraine but it is linked in some way, because the catalyst for really assessing _ way, because the catalyst for really assessing the fact that we need to be independent, self—sufficient in terms _ be independent, self—sufficient in terms of— be independent, self—sufficient in terms of energy, like the usa are so we are _ terms of energy, like the usa are so we are not— terms of energy, like the usa are so we are not reliant on other countries _ we are not reliant on other countries for our power. you would think— countries for our power. you would think the _ countries for our power. you would think the climate change would have been enough of a carrot and an

incentive, _ been enough of a carrot and an incentive, but seemingly not. so very quickly, the government are having _ very quickly, the government are having a — very quickly, the government are having a look at where we are going to going _ having a look at where we are going to going with our energy in the future — to going with our energy in the future it— to going with our energy in the future. it has to be renewables, it has to— future. it has to be renewables, it has to he — future. it has to be renewables, it has to be green. nuclear energy is green, _ has to be green. nuclear energy is green, but — has to be green. nuclear energy is green, but actually making nuclear energv_ green, but actually making nuclear energy isn't. borisjohnson is very behind _ energy isn't. borisjohnson is very behind this, — energy isn't. borisjohnson is very behind this, rishi sunak, not so much _ behind this, rishi sunak, not so much. there is the debate going on in terms _ much. there is the debate going on in terms of— much. there is the debate going on in terms of how you pay for all of this _ in terms of how you pay for all of this one — in terms of how you pay for all of this. one thing is for sure, there is no _ this. one thing is for sure, there is no answer— this. one thing is for sure, there is no answer to the energy situation in terms _ is no answer to the energy situation in terms of— is no answer to the energy situation in terms of weaning ourselves off fossil— in terms of weaning ourselves off fossil fuels are becoming zero, which — fossil fuels are becoming zero, which is — fossil fuels are becoming zero, which is what we have to do. there is no _ which is what we have to do. there is no answer— which is what we have to do. there is no answer to the short term that there _ is no answer to the short term that there is— is no answer to the short term that there is really cheap. we have no choice _ there is really cheap. we have no choice we — there is really cheap. we have no choice, we have to invest. nuclear might— choice, we have to invest. nuclear might be _ choice, we have to invest. nuclear might be the way to go, but what the story is— might be the way to go, but what the story is about, if they are going to be these _ story is about, if they are going to be these nuclear power stations, there _ be these nuclear power stations, there might be resistance by some of

these _ there might be resistance by some of these residents are part of the bribe — these residents are part of the bribe will— these residents are part of the bribe will be, you will get free energv — bribe will be, you will get free energy. be bribe will be, you will get free ener: . �* , ., , ., energy. be interesting to see how that is received. _ energy. be interesting to see how that is received. on _ energy. be interesting to see how that is received. on the _ energy. be interesting to see how that is received. on the front - energy. be interesting to see how| that is received. on the front page of the financial times, chinese walls, shanghai shirts finance district. anna, talk us through it very quickly. district. anna, talk us through it very quickly-— district. anna, talk us through it very quickly. cave it continues to ra . e very quickly. cave it continues to race in very quickly. cave it continues to rage in china- — very quickly. cave it continues to rage in china. it _ very quickly. cave it continues to rage in china. it is _ very quickly. cave it continues to rage in china. it is unclear- very quickly. cave it continues to rage in china. it is unclear from. rage in china. it is unclearfrom that story how many cases there are or if this is a case of an authoritarian regime just continuing to pursue its zero covid—safe radge. reading it, unless they have a new strain, i am delighted we don't have that here because it is people under lockdown for basically two years. it lockdown for basically two years. it is an extraordinary length of time and to hear that number of people in that important city, the financial heart in lots of ways, we will see how that pans out over the next nine days or so, that lockdown is in

place. staying with the front page of the financial times and take a look at the story we have heard a lot about over the last week and gemma, it is sharps to tell tea ferries to rehire staff. —— p&o ferries. ferries to rehire staff. -- p&o ferries. , . , ferries to rehire staff. -- p&o ferries. , ., , , ., ferries. this was the shameful way p&o ferries. this was the shameful way "so sacked _ ferries. this was the shameful way poo sacked 800 _ ferries. this was the shameful way p&o sacked 800 people _ ferries. this was the shameful way p&o sacked 800 people over- ferries. this was the shameful way | p&o sacked 800 people over zoom ferries. this was the shameful way . p&o sacked 800 people over zoom so p&0 sacked 800 people over zoom so they could _ p&0 sacked 800 people over zoom so they could pay £5, roughly. the government were criticised for handling — government were criticised for handling this badly, inasmuch as they voted against the fire and rehire — they voted against the fire and rehire bill which would have prevented this. now they are bringing _ prevented this. now they are bringing in legislation so it it will he — bringing in legislation so it it will be illegal for any british workers _ will be illegal for any british workers working out of british ports to he _ workers working out of british ports to he paid _ workers working out of british ports to be paid less than the minimum

wage _ to be paid less than the minimum wage so — to be paid less than the minimum wage. so essentially it is a bit of a farce — wage. so essentially it is a bit of a farce it— wage. so essentially it is a bit of a farce it is— wage. so essentially it is a bit of a farce. it is a total farce, grant shapps— a farce. it is a total farce, grant shapps saying you might want to rethink— shapps saying you might want to rethink this, rehire the people you fired and _ rethink this, rehire the people you fired and keep them on. we will see how p80 _ fired and keep them on. we will see how p&0 react. but the pr for p&0, i am not _ how p&0 react. but the pr for p&0, i am not sure _ how p&0 react. but the pr for p&0, i am not sure many tea will want to -et am not sure many tea will want to get on _ am not sure many tea will want to get on p80 — am not sure many tea will want to get on p&0 ferry at the moment. anna, _ get on p&0 ferry at the moment. anna, are _ get on p&0 ferry at the moment. anna, are you tempted tojump on a p&0 anna, are you tempted tojump on a p&o ferry and more importantly, i suppose, how do you think the politicians have handled this? i politicians have handled this? i think it is a good point you raise, because while technically p&o does appear to have done this legally because of the extremely complicated nature of maritime law and changes we brought in a few years ago, i think the main thing is it is a company that depends on consumers. consumers should vote with their feet, if they are outraged, which

most people are, they should not be booking p&o, there are lots of other companies. i think it already has been said by some people, i won't be booking p&o ferry. as the politicians it has been an omnishambles. first they said they didn't know about the sackings in advance. an grant shapps is going to get a resolution out of this. it has get a resolution out of this. it has been an extraordinary _ get a resolution out of this. it has been an extraordinary series - get a resolution out of this. it has been an extraordinary series of i been an extraordinary series of events. the last story and we will go to the front page of the daily telegraph. a story on the bottom right—hand side of front page. it is

quite maybe, on the top of the cv to say i have dyslexic, please excuse any bad spelling. that is completely understandable but i would say if you are not dyslexic and you are going for a job injournalism, for instance, in that regard, it would be quite important that you had your spelling and your syntax and your grammar quite correct but the point he's making is a good one which is

basically being more open knighted about different neurodiverse paper. anna, 30 seconds left, what do you make of this?— make of this? picking up on that oint, on make of this? picking up on that point, onjournalism, _ make of this? picking up on that point, onjournalism, i- make of this? picking up on that point, onjournalism, iwould . point, onjournalism, iwould happilv— point, onjournalism, iwould happily hire dyslexicjournalist. happily hire dyslexic journalist. writing — happily hire dyslexicjournalist. writing and typing can be corrected by many _ writing and typing can be corrected by many tools and the main trick is to he _ by many tools and the main trick is to be able — by many tools and the main trick is to be able to find stories. any prospective journalist out there, i do not _ prospective journalist out there, i do not want to discourage them. that is wonderful — do not want to discourage them. that is wonderful to _ do not want to discourage them. trisgt is wonderful to hear. gemma, i suppose it speaks to a change in approach in so many areas of life now. you mention things like declaring on top of the cv, i hadn't thought about that, but it is true notjust thought about that, but it is true not just the dyslexic thought about that, but it is true notjust the dyslexic but thought about that, but it is true not just the dyslexic but for thought about that, but it is true notjust the dyslexic but for many areas. i not just the dyslexic but for many areas. ~' not just the dyslexic but for many areas. ~ , ., ~ not just the dyslexic but for many areas. ~ ,., ~ ., areas. i think so, i think we are all learning _ areas. i think so, i think we are all learning to _ areas. i think so, i think we are all learning to be _ areas. i think so, i think we are all learning to be more - areas. i think so, i think we are | all learning to be more tolerant, more progressive, more understanding, and i think making a display. that could negate any discolouration.—

discolouration. brilliant stuff, thank you _ discolouration. brilliant stuff, thank you for _ discolouration. brilliant stuff, thank you for talking - discolouration. brilliant stuff, thank you for talking us - discolouration. brilliant stuff, i thank you for talking us through that and anna as