hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are writer and broadcaster kate bevan and nigel nelson, political editor at the sunday mirror and sunday people. tomorrow's front pages... the times describes the prime minister as defiant as he gets ready to defend the party scandal in the commons. the telegraph also leads on the downing street parties and says the prime minister is accused of instigating a drinks party. the daily mirror has a similar story on its front page, saying borisjohnson encouraged

staff to let off steam as covid rules were broken. the i describes the prime minister as facing a �*triple threat�* over the downing street parties. mps return on tuesday, he'll face prime minister's questions and a possible vote of censure too. the daily mail says ministers have rounded on the the archbishop of canterbury after he criticised the uk's plan to send asylum seekers to rwanda. meanwhile, the daily express describes the same story as mps attacking the archbishop of canterbury over his criticsim of the rwanda migrants plan. the guardian's front page highlights that women in the poorest areas of england are dying earlier than the average female in almost every comparable country in the world. so let's begin... lots to get through. we are going to start on the downing street parties as we had seen on quite a few of the

front pages, hello to you both, good to see you again. we'll start with the front page of the mirror, johnson led the boozy party. kate, tell us the details.— tell us the details. according to the writer. _ tell us the details. according to the writer, it _ tell us the details. according to the writer, it looks _ tell us the details. according to the writer, it looks like - tell us the details. according to the writer, it looks like it - tell us the details. according to | the writer, it looks like it wasn't just a party where the prime minister rocked up a bit late but apparently according to them, he was the one who turned it from usual friday drinks into an actual party. i will think what we see from the rest of front pages is what downing street is going to be doing to get ahead on this on tuesday, they are going to say it was part of work, and he didn't realise he was breaking the rules so it will be a pretty torrid time for the prime minister on tuesday, i think. torrid times, do minister on tuesday, i think. torrid times. do you _ minister on tuesday, i think. torrid times. do you go — minister on tuesday, i think. torrid times, do you go along _ minister on tuesday, i think. torrid times, do you go along with - minister on tuesday, i think. torrid times, do you go along with that, l times, do you go along with that, nigel? i times, do you go along with that, niel? . . , ., ., nigel? i certainly do. the whole oint is

nigel? i certainly do. the whole point is saf _ nigel? i certainly do. the whole point is saf deemed _ nigel? i certainly do. the whole point is saf deemed to - nigel? i certainly do. the whole point is saf deemed to be - nigel? i certainly do. the whole point is saf deemed to be the l point is saf deemed to be the organiser— point is saf deemed to be the organiser of the party when the paper— organiser of the party when the paper says he has led the party, you could _ paper says he has led the party, you could be _ paper says he has led the party, you could be dealing with a 10,000 pine fine on the basis of that. —— 510.000 _ fine on the basis of that. —— 510.000 i_ fine on the basis of that. —— £10,000. i think i agree with kate there _ £10,000. i think i agree with kate there that — £10,000. i think i agree with kate there that without paper, we may not have known_ there that without paper, we may not have known anything about these parties _ have known anything about these parties and the fact that it is thanks— parties and the fact that it is thanks to _ parties and the fact that it is thanks to her that the whole thing has come — thanks to her that the whole thing has come to light, it has been a drip feed — has come to light, it has been a drip feed i_ has come to light, it has been a drip feed. i think the big question comes_ drip feed. i think the big question comes up— drip feed. i think the big question comes up as to what tutorial mps do ahout— comes up as to what tutorial mps do about it _ comes up as to what tutorial mps do about it. none of them were against boris _ about it. none of them were against borisjohnson right from about it. none of them were against boris johnson right from the about it. none of them were against borisjohnson right from the start but they— borisjohnson right from the start but they held their noses and went for him _ but they held their noses and went for him on — but they held their noses and went for him on the basis that they saw him as— for him on the basis that they saw him as a _ for him on the basis that they saw him as a vote winner, which of course — him as a vote winner, which of course he _ him as a vote winner, which of course he was on the 2019 election. the question comes up to now, whether— the question comes up to now, whether the voters still have that kind of— whether the voters still have that kind of faith in him and we will find that— kind of faith in him and we will find that out when the local elections come out on may the vet and tory— elections come out on may the vet and tory mps may well change their

minds _ and tory mps may well change their minds after that.— minds after that. kate, let's go back to his _ minds after that. kate, let's go back to his tactics _ minds after that. kate, let's go back to his tactics you - minds after that. kate, let's go back to his tactics you are - minds after that. kate, let's go - back to his tactics you are touching on there, because the front page of the times says defiant pm insists he didn't break covid rules, johnson to defend party scandal in common. lots of people clearly have made up their mind about this story but what details do they have here about his approach over the next be weeks? they've got a quote from somebody they call a source, so we can assume that someone fairly close to the prime minister and the quote is there was always an exemption around work but the prime minister accepted mistakes were made, the source goes on to say that if you are going for a meeting to meeting, people wouldn't predict legal that a party. if you go to somewhere where you are giving a speech, you are not partying. it is a place of work. i think that full stand when he consider he accepted the fixed penalty notice and he also apologised for it so it is hard for

the prime minister himself to defend, to tank best line of defence and say, i didn't realise i was breaking the coronavirus rules when you have accepted a fine for it, so it will be interesting to see how that one stands up under fire from the opposition benches and for everybody else on tuesday, too. nigel, people will bring it back to their own experiences because there were many times when people were obeying the letter of the rules, the letter of the law, even if in some certain convoluted circumstances it seemed a bit strange or a bit extreme, people did bathe those, and they will reflect on their own experiences when they listen to the words of the prime minister. —— they did obey those. find words of the prime minister. -- they did obey those-— did obey those. and that is why eo - le did obey those. and that is why people are _ did obey those. and that is why people are angry _ did obey those. and that is why people are angry about - did obey those. and that is why people are angry about it, - did obey those. and that is why . people are angry about it, because people _ people are angry about it, because people did — people are angry about it, because people did obey the rules. and what has happened in the last week since the promise was fined, tory mp in boxes _ the promise was fined, tory mp in boxes have — the promise was fined, tory mp in boxes have been filling up with experiences that people are relating about— experiences that people are relating about the _

experiences that people are relating about the sacrifices they made during — about the sacrifices they made during lockdown and that is why they are so— during lockdown and that is why they are so furious with the prime minister— are so furious with the prime minister and the way he has behaved. this sort— minister and the way he has behaved. this sort of— minister and the way he has behaved. this sort of close ally describing the whole — this sort of close ally describing the whole thing, that he didn't break— the whole thing, that he didn't break the _ the whole thing, that he didn't break the rules on the basis there was arr— break the rules on the basis there was an exemption for a workplace and number— was an exemption for a workplace and number ten _ was an exemption for a workplace and number ten is was an exemption for a workplace and numberten is a was an exemption for a workplace and number ten is a workplace, i don't think— number ten is a workplace, i don't think it _ number ten is a workplace, i don't think it quite holds water not when you have _ think it quite holds water not when you have got a workplace that seems to be full— you have got a workplace that seems to be full of— you have got a workplace that seems to be full of people wandering around — to be full of people wandering around with cheese and wine and table _ around with cheese and wine and table is _ around with cheese and wine and table is loaded without a whole. so, we'll see _ table is loaded without a whole. so, we'll see some of the more details of that— we'll see some of the more details of that when sue gray's report is published, — of that when sue gray's report is published, and of course that will come _ published, and of course that will come out — published, and of course that will come out as soon as the police have finished _ come out as soon as the police have finished their investigations. so, at a pace — finished their investigations. so, at a pace we are going, we could see that in— at a pace we are going, we could see that in the _ at a pace we are going, we could see that in the next couple of weeks. as we that in the next couple of weeks. is we mentioned, that in the next couple of weeks. sis we mentioned, big week next week, we will hearfrom the we mentioned, big week next week, we will hear from the prime minister himself. we are going to move to the front page of the daily express. again, a story that is on a few of the front pages, the headline is mps

attacked welby ranch. what is this about, kate? this attacked welby ranch. what is this about. kate?— attacked welby ranch. what is this about,kate? a , , . about, kate? as you perhaps expect, to mps about, kate? as you perhaps expect, tory mps who — about, kate? as you perhaps expect, tory mps who are _ about, kate? as you perhaps expect, tory mps who are defending - about, kate? as you perhaps expect, tory mps who are defending the - about, kate? as you perhaps expect, l tory mps who are defending the whole plan to send migrants to rwanda. i am old enough to know the row when the archbishop had a go at margaret thatcher so it is many ways the archbishop's job to do this but that doesn't store them annoying the tory mps in the process. as we said earlier, we expect the church to have a strong moral voice on this and i think is a good thing that justin welby is standing up, and i hope he stands firm in the face of the opprobrium from tory mps. let’s the opprobrium from tory mps. let's move on to — the opprobrium from tory mps. let's move on to the _ the opprobrium from tory mps. let's move on to the front _ the opprobrium from tory mps. let's move on to the front page of the guardian, nigel, the headline is revealed, shocking rate of female

deaths in england's poorest areas. what is going on here? by, deaths in england's poorest areas. what is going on here?— what is going on here? a study by the health foundation _ what is going on here? a study by the health foundation shows - what is going on here? a study by the health foundation shows that| what is going on here? a study by i the health foundation shows that the poorer— the health foundation shows that the poorer the _ the health foundation shows that the poorer the area, the life expectancy of women _ poorer the area, the life expectancy of women is — poorer the area, the life expectancy of women is much lower. they put it at about— of women is much lower. they put it at about 787 — of women is much lower. they put it at about 78.7 years, and in wealthier— at about 78.7 years, and in wealthier areas of england, the life expectancy is eight years higher. this is— expectancy is eight years higher. this is really, when you compare it to other— this is really, when you compare it to other countries, similar countries, we are pretty much below the bottom _ countries, we are pretty much below the bottom of the oecd league. what this presents is a major challenge for michael gove and the levelling up for michael gove and the levelling up agenda because life expectancy must _ up agenda because life expectancy must play an important part in levelling — must play an important part in levelling up. if we are going to have _ levelling up. if we are going to have some kind of equality, it should — have some kind of equality, it should be _ have some kind of equality, it should be that people don't live longer— should be that people don't live longerjust because they live in a richer— longerjust because they live in a richer area — longerjust because they live in a richer area of the country.- richer area of the country. kate, there are _ richer area of the country. kate, there are a _ richer area of the country. kate, there are a couple _ richer area of the country. kate,

there are a couple of _ richer area of the country. kate, there are a couple of different . there are a couple of different crossover issues here, there is the inability across the country driven by poverty and life circumstance, and also i suppose a wider issue here about many health services being designed with men in mind rather than women, and there is actually layer upon layer of disadvantage here in often quite subtle ways. disadvantage here in often quite subtle ways-— disadvantage here in often quite subtle wa s. , , , subtle ways. yes, this is something that has been _ subtle ways. yes, this is something that has been talked _ subtle ways. yes, this is something that has been talked about - subtle ways. yes, this is something that has been talked about more i subtle ways. yes, this is something l that has been talked about more over the past few years where we are talking about things like women have different heart attack symptoms so quite often women get treatment later and too late for heart attacks. also, women's health generally, women dying in childbirth and we see scandals around some of the cat women have had, and this is all impacting, it is very much a gender—based, sex —based thing. it is pretty scandalous that in the 21st—century, this is still the case. 21st-century, this is still the case. �* ,

21st-century, this is still the case. 2 ., 21st-century, this is still the case. �*, s, s, s, case. let's move on to the telegraph. _ case. let's move on to the telegraph, will— case. let's move on to the telegraph, will stick - case. let's move on to the telegraph, will stick with i case. let's move on to the i telegraph, will stick with the case. let's move on to the - telegraph, will stick with the theme of the health service, slightly different angle, a focus on ambulance services, and this will certainly raise a few eyebrows. nigel, a little story on the right—hand side at the front page, the headline is volunteers on call for 999, which sounds perhaps to some little alarming. i am certainly alarmed by — some little alarming. i am certainly alarmed by it- _ some little alarming. i am certainly alarmed by it. the _ some little alarming. i am certainly alarmed by it. the idea _ some little alarming. i am certainly alarmed by it. the idea of- some little alarming. i am certainly alarmed by it. the idea of this - some little alarming. i am certainly alarmed by it. the idea of this is i alarmed by it. the idea of this is that because there are major ambulance delays and it takes an hour longer to get to heart attacks or more _ hour longer to get to heart attacks or more than an hour to get to a heart _ or more than an hour to get to a heart attack _ or more than an hour to get to a heart attack or a stroke victim, this is— heart attack or a stroke victim, this is the _ heart attack or a stroke victim, this is the london ambulance service. — this is the london ambulance service, the idea is that to use volunteers— service, the idea is that to use volunteers who are already ferrying patients _ volunteers who are already ferrying patients to hospital, but actually use them — patients to hospital, but actually use them for emergency calls. what worries— use them for emergency calls. what worries me — use them for emergency calls. what worries me about this, i would much rather— worries me about this, i would much rather a _ worries me about this, i would much rather a paramedic came along to an

emergency— rather a paramedic came along to an emergency call about than be the back of— emergency call about than be the back of a — emergency call about than be the back of a car by somebody who has no medical— back of a car by somebody who has no medical knowledge at all. yes, i think— medical knowledge at all. yes, i think this — medical knowledge at all. yes, i think this is actually quite worrying. but there is a problem with ambulances, my wife recently fell off— with ambulances, my wife recently fell off her— with ambulances, my wife recently fell off her horse and broke her pelvis, — fell off her horse and broke her pelvis, i— fell off her horse and broke her pelvis, i drove her to hospital rather— pelvis, i drove her to hospital rather than wait for the ambulance, we weren't— rather than wait for the ambulance, we weren't even sure that was the right— we weren't even sure that was the right thing — we weren't even sure that was the right thing to do but we thought it was better than sitting there for an hour or— was better than sitting there for an hour or more having to wait for them — hour or more having to wait for them. ~ ., , , s, them. wow, we wish your wife well, of course. kate, _ them. wow, we wish your wife well, of course. kate, is _ them. wow, we wish your wife well, of course. kate, is this _ them. wow, we wish your wife well, of course. kate, is this something . of course. kate, is this something that sounds shocking but needs must? if we are in this position with needs must, we are in a pretty poor place. modern emergency practice isn't necessary to take someone to hospital, lives are saved when somebody is there in their front room when they have had a heart attack because the hospital, in effect, comes to them. so this is

really worrying. irate effect, comes to them. so this is really worrying-— effect, comes to them. so this is really worrying. we may finally now onto the front _ really worrying. we may finally now onto the front page _ really worrying. we may finally now onto the front page of— really worrying. we may finally now onto the front page of the - really worrying. we may finally now onto the front page of the times. i really worrying. we may finally now onto the front page of the times. a picture story, a glorious picture, and it is kind of haunting, also, because the picture of the picture, which i will explain in a second. we have a front page of a lovely smiling mum with her daughter, and the reason it is a lovely picture is because of the picture in the tiny bottom right hand side of that picture which is difficult to see but we will try to get a close—up of eight. but we will try to get a close-up of eiaht. ., ., ~ but we will try to get a close-up of eiaht. ., s, ,, , s, eight. nigel, took us through it. this is an absolutely _ eight. nigel, took us through it. - this is an absolutely heart-warming this is an absolutely heart—warming picture. _ this is an absolutely heart—warming picture. this— this is an absolutely heart—warming picture, this is sasha mcavoy who schools— picture, this is sasha mcavoy who schools the details on her two—year—old daughter, on her back, 'ust two—year—old daughter, on her back, just in— two—year—old daughter, on her back, just in case _ two—year—old daughter, on her back, just in case they became separated, and this— just in case they became separated, and this happened in the first day of the _ and this happened in the first day of the war — and this happened in the first day of the war. why it brought home the real horror— of the war. why it brought home the real horror of what is going on in

ukraine — real horror of what is going on in ukraine is— real horror of what is going on in ukraine is the other reason that sasha _ ukraine is the other reason that sasha did — ukraine is the other reason that sasha did this, she was worried that one or— sasha did this, she was worried that one or both— sasha did this, she was worried that one or both of them might be killed, and if— one or both of them might be killed, and if they— one or both of them might be killed, and if they were, if she was killed, her daughter would be able at some time in _ her daughter would be able at some time in the — her daughter would be able at some time in the future with those details. _ time in the future with those details, when she had grown up, be able to— details, when she had grown up, be able to look— details, when she had grown up, be able to look at her mother on instagram, and also she was thinking that if— instagram, and also she was thinking that if her— instagram, and also she was thinking that if her daughter was killed, at least _ that if her daughter was killed, at least somebody would know who she was and _ least somebody would know who she was and she could be buried with her name' _ was and she could be buried with her name. and _ was and she could be buried with her name, and as we know, an awful lot of victims _ name, and as we know, an awful lot of victims of — name, and as we know, an awful lot of victims of the russians in ukraine _ of victims of the russians in ukraine are still waiting to be identified. so, it really was a very moving _ identified. so, it really was a very moving story, and the great thing about— moving story, and the great thing about this — moving story, and the great thing about this lovely picture of these two smiling faces is that they are now safe — two smiling faces is that they are now safe in france. | two smiling faces is that they are now safe in france.— two smiling faces is that they are now safe in france. i am afraid we are running _ now safe in france. i am afraid we are running out — now safe in france. i am afraid we are running out of— now safe in france. i am afraid we are running out of time, _ now safe in france. i am afraid we are running out of time, the - now safe in france. i am afraid we are running out of time, the last l now safe in france. i am afraid we l are running out of time, the last 20 seconds, kate, your reaction to seeing that photo. just seconds, kate, your reaction to seeing that photo.— seeing that photo. just very relieved that _ seeing that photo. just very relieved that they _ seeing that photo. just very relieved that they are - seeing that photo. just very relieved that they are safe l seeing that photo. just veryl relieved that they are safe in france, and the story reminded me of

children who were evacuated from london during the war with their names and addresses or labels around then next. nothing changes in wartime, really.— then next. nothing changes in wartime, really. then next. nothing changes in wartime, reall . a ., s, wartime, really. indeed. we have to finish, we have _ wartime, really. indeed. we have to finish, we have run _ wartime, really. indeed. we have to finish, we have run out— wartime, really. indeed. we have to finish, we have run out of— wartime, really. indeed. we have to finish, we have run out of time, - finish, we have run out of time, thank you for guiding us through the front pages, kate and nigel. and thatisit front pages, kate and nigel. and that is it for this edition of in the papers. we are back tomorrow at the same time. hey, welcome, welcome, welcome! lara lewington, what is the craziest thing you've ever bought on ebay?

um, slippers? dogs — dog slippers! i wondered where that was going. ok, i did ask for crazy. well, look, do you remember the times when you bid on an item and you thought you were going to win the auction, and then in the dying few seconds, you were beaten by someone else? yes, they weren't real people, though, were they? no, they weren't. they were computer programmes designed to work really fast and beat you to the bid button, and i hated them. no—one did that to my dog slippers, though. can't imagine why. well, look, now, this idea is being used in new ways, and omar mehtab has been looking at the phenomenon of the scalpers. with the pandemic came lockdowns, and with the majority of the population stuck at home, we had nothing really to do...but buy. and so online spending went up. we bought clothes, hobby kits, sourdough starters, fire pits, hot tubs, gym equipment, anything to get us through it, and that includes gaming consoles like the brand—new ps5.

but there was a problem —