this is bbc news. the headlines — the us supreme court has confirmed the authenticity of a leaked document which suggests millions of women could lose their legal right to an abortion. if the landmark ruling roe v wade is overturned, abortion will become illegal in 22 states. meanwhile, president biden has warned americans that any move to scrap legalised abortion would throw into question a whole range of rights and that "basic fairness" demanded the right to abortion. rival demonstrations have been taking place outside the supreme court. 101 civilians who've been living under the besieged steel plant in mariupol have finally reached safety in ukrainian territory.

many had been trapped underground for over 60 days. hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are katy balls, who's deputy political editor at the spectator, and the broadcaster penny smith. tomorrow's front pages, starting with... the metro covers a terror trial in which a former pub landlord is alleged to have claimed money in covid bounce—back loans, but then sent it to the islamic state terrorist group. the same story is in the ft, though they lead with the huge profts made by bp and the calls they've prompted for a windfall tax on energy firms.

the mirror also reports bp's profits, working them out to £639 per second and also lambasting the prime ministerfor his response in a tv interview today. the lead in the telegraph is about claims that france withheld secrets about missiles used to kill british soldiers in the falklands war a0 years ago tomorrow. the times has an interview with the vice—chancellor of cambridge university. he says, in future, there will be fewer students at oxbridge from independent schools. the guardian reports on the leaked document suggesting the american supreme court could scrap the legal right to abortion and joe biden�*s comments saying the right to abortion is fundamental. once again, the daily mail goes with the pressure on keir starmer over claims he broke lockdown rules. while the sun covers the latest development

in the madeleine mccann case, saying fibres from madeleine's clothing have been found in a camper van belonging to the chief suspect. so, let's begin. a wide variety of front pages in one story that appears on many of them and we will start with the daily mirror. beyond pathetic and this is a story about the amount of money bp has made as it has announced a sharp rise in profits for the first quarter of the year. they have got the cat litter out and amounted that it is £639 a second and given the political allegiances of the daily mirror, it is not happy. this political allegiances of the daily mirror, it is not happy.- mirror, it is not happy. this is such a huge. _ mirror, it is not happy. this is such a huge, huge _ mirror, it is not happy. this is such a huge, huge leap- mirror, it is not happy. this is such a huge, huge leap in - such a huge, huge leap in profits for bp. and they are linking... and they have put beyond pathetic

because of the interview, they are going being on the interview that borisjohnson did on good morning britain. and it's saying that obviously this is such a major problem for anybody. everybody in britain is struggling with the cost of heating, and petrol obviously, but you have got that one particular point where he is challenged about 877—year—old woman who essentially has been forced to go endlessly round on a busjust has been forced to go endlessly round on a bus just to has been forced to go endlessly round on a busjust to keep more because she cannot afford to keep warm at home. before he even addresses that in what he really should have said in that situation was how appalling and i do know that this is not a one—off, notjust one isolated incident, people up and in the land are really struggling and struggling to make ends meet and evenif struggling to make ends meet and even if they are not struggling now

because of course it is my and it is unseasonably cold but it is going to get a little bit easier over the summer and then comes the winter again. soap is bad enough already but what he should've said was it's a terrible situation and we are seeing what we can do and we will have and maybe even say we will look again at may doing a windfall tax on bp. because after all when he was challenged, the chap of the type of bp, when he was challenged would he stop doing any of the things that he was going to invest in with his 18 billion that he already put aside, what he stop any of those if he had a windfall tax, he said no, so do it. �* , ., ~ a windfall tax, he said no, so do it. let's talk about the windfall tax. now the _ it. let's talk about the windfall tax. now the daily _ it. let's talk about the windfall tax. now the daily mirror - it. let's talk about the windfall tax. now the daily mirror is . it. let's talk about the windfall - tax. now the daily mirror is calling a course the prime minister has set the energy tax will deter investment in renewables and green energy. what else is government saying as to why it does not think it's a good idea? the government argument that you hear is _

the government argument that you hear is as_ the government argument that you hear is as you say it would deter investment_ hear is as you say it would deter investment and actually want to attract these companies here and you want to— attract these companies here and you want to put— attract these companies here and you want to put in most of the economy as possible — want to put in most of the economy as possible and suggesting bad for business — as possible and suggesting bad for business. where that line gets a bit harder_ business. where that line gets a bit harder to _ business. where that line gets a bit harder to hold is as you hear about these _ harder to hold is as you hear about these sky—high profits from bp in these sky—high profits from bp in the suggestion in one of the view that even— the suggestion in one of the view that even if there was a windfall tax, that even if there was a windfall tax. bp— that even if there was a windfall tax, bp would not change the investment plans here. sol tax, bp would not change the investment plans here. so i think you wiii— investment plans here. so i think you will see more pressure on the government to consider this an labout— government to consider this an labour has _ government to consider this an labour has been calling for some time _ labour has been calling for some time and — labour has been calling for some time and i— labour has been calling for some time and i think it's really one of their— time and i think it's really one of their clearest policies, if not the clearest — their clearest policies, if not the clearest in— their clearest policies, if not the clearest in terms of what they managed to get out there in the media — managed to get out there in the media. and that means that the tories _ media. and that means that the tories are in a tight spot because you have — tories are in a tight spot because you have a — tories are in a tight spot because you have a situation where lots of people _ you have a situation where lots of people don't want to give labour a win but— people don't want to give labour a win but in— people don't want to give labour a win but in recent weeks we have had a fracturing in terms of where the cabinet _ a fracturing in terms of where the cabinet speak on this and in terms of emphasis. so you had the chancellor last week not really one out and _ chancellor last week not really one out and not saying it was going to

happen— out and not saying it was going to happen but not really get out if companies did not do enough of their own accord — companies did not do enough of their own accord. and while borisjohnson has been _ own accord. and while borisjohnson has been more strident against one, ithink— has been more strident against one, i think it _ has been more strident against one, i think it does come down to the back— i think it does come down to the back bench— i think it does come down to the back bench and what can the government do in this crisis? the premise _ government do in this crisis? the premise of— government do in this crisis? the premise of the day suggested there are limits _ premise of the day suggested there are limits because government does not want _ are limits because government does not want to— are limits because government does not want to fit inflation so he does not want to fit inflation so he does not want _ not want to fit inflation so he does not want to — not want to fit inflation so he does not want to borrow more but this does _ not want to borrow more but this does mean — not want to borrow more but this does mean you will see more pressure for something like a windfall tax to provide _ for something like a windfall tax to provide a _ for something like a windfall tax to provide a bit of extra support. turning — provide a bit of extra support. turning to _ provide a bit of extra support. turning to the i now, she mentioned they are the tories in a tight spot. you could argue the same over their plans for a cross channel migrants if the headline here is to be believed. miranda migrant planning chaos. tell us a bit more about what the i is saying about this. i chaos. tell us a bit more about what the i is saying about this.— the i is saying about this. i don't think anybody — the i is saying about this. i don't think anybody will— the i is saying about this. i don't think anybody will be _ think anybody will be particularly surprised with the fact that when this much touted new idea of sending people straight to ramada where they

would then be processed as it were, i don't think there was any surprise they were going to be challenges because immediately they announced it, everybody said there will be challenges. it looks like they will be no deportations taking place four months despite the target of doing it this month. there was a legal challenge which could result in an injunction against this resettlement scheme. and meanwhile 7000 people have arrived in small boats so far and criminal gangs are actually using this as a way to extort even more money from these people because they are saying you have got to get over before things change it which is just one out that these are people who are desperate. they had been through help. the vast majority of them. i would say that actually all of them really because anybody he was prepared to take a small leaky boat to try and get across the

channel is going to be in a terrible situation. they have survived violence, disaster, persecution, war, whatever and just put that in perspective and putting that out there. and now there is this blame game going on and the i says it's over the optimistic timescale. coming on the top of what we have just seen on the front page of the daily mirror and other papers, there will be a lot of tories just going at the moment things are not going their way. the at the moment things are not going their wa . ., , at the moment things are not going their wa . ,., .,, _, their way. the government has come under a lot of— their way. the government has come under a lot of pressure _ their way. the government has come under a lot of pressure to _ their way. the government has come under a lot of pressure to try - their way. the government has come under a lot of pressure to try to - under a lot of pressure to try to stem the tide of the number of migrants that are coming to the uk, and i suppose one might say these things take time and yes perhaps the timescale was a little bit optimistic. but this was never going to be an incident fix, was it? i to be an incident fix, was it? i also think there is a weight with the policy — also think there is a weight with the policy. politicallyl also think there is a weight with the policy. politically i think the sense _ the policy. politically i think the sense of— the policy. politically i think the

sense of numberten the policy. politically i think the sense of number ten is they stand by this policy— sense of number ten is they stand by this policy in— sense of number ten is they stand by this policy in various briefings from — this policy in various briefings from staff to special advisers. ignore — from staff to special advisers. ignore what the commentary it might say. ignore what the commentary it might say this _ ignore what the commentary it might say this is _ ignore what the commentary it might say. this is what voters want and cross—examine a big issue of concern and i_ cross—examine a big issue of concern and i think— cross—examine a big issue of concern and i think they are confident this is reaching — and i think they are confident this is reaching out to the voter base. second _ is reaching out to the voter base. second of— is reaching out to the voter base. second of that, looking at the delays, — second of that, looking at the delays, yes, it's chaotic but i would — delays, yes, it's chaotic but i would also put something else forward — would also put something else forward which is under the government is not like it had about having a _ government is not like it had about having a fight by the policy. in a way if _ having a fight by the policy. in a way if they— having a fight by the policy. in a way if they have to go to court and the government looks as though they are the _ the government looks as though they are the ones standing up for this hard _ are the ones standing up for this hard border policy and actually others — hard border policy and actually others trying to thwart that, although it's not getting the policy and action, i think there are some government who think that actually is not _ government who think that actually is not the _ government who think that actually is not the worst possible scenario to begin — is not the worst possible scenario to begin because others are trying to begin because others are trying to stop them. so it clearly does risk and — to stop them. so it clearly does risk and does look chaotic in some ways— risk and does look chaotic in some ways because to change to target but i ways because to change to target but i don't _ ways because to change to target but i don't think a court case for legal

idon't think a court case for legal action— idon't think a court case for legal action is— i don't think a court case for legal action is necessarily the worst thing — action is necessarily the worst thing in — action is necessarily the worst thing in the eyes of some in government that can happen when it comes— government that can happen when it comes to _ government that can happen when it comes to this policy. perhaps actually— comes to this policy. perhaps actually it— comes to this policy. perhaps actually it can happen when it comes to this _ actually it can happen when it comes to this policy. perhaps actually giving — to this policy. perhaps actually giving security of the policy and action— giving security of the policy and action is— giving security of the policy and action is if— giving security of the policy and action is if it really works or is in any— action is if it really works or is in any way— action is if it really works or is in any way cost—effective. action is if it really works or is in any way cost-effective. let's turn to the _ in any way cost-effective. let's turn to the daily _ in any way cost-effective. let's turn to the daily mail _ in any way cost-effective. let's turn to the daily mail because l in any way cost—effective. let�*s turn to the daily mail because we have had two stories about the government and boris johnson have had two stories about the government and borisjohnson under the cost but the daily mail is pushing beer gate day seven, another attack from the daily mail on keir starmer, the man they say who just cannot answer a straight question. this is about that beer that he had or was pictured having after an eventin or was pictured having after an event in durham.— or was pictured having after an event in durham. yes, beer gate in durham. which _ event in durham. yes, beer gate in durham. which it _ event in durham. yes, beer gate in durham. which it now _ event in durham. yes, beer gate in durham. which it now seems - event in durham. yes, beer gate in durham. which it now seems his i durham. which it now seems his deputy— durham. which it now seems his deputy angela rayner and the party officials _ deputy angela rayner and the party officials were there. it was they were _ officials were there. it was they were in— officials were there. it was they

were in a — officials were there. it was they were in a curry that was happening. and it _ were in a curry that was happening. and it was — were in a curry that was happening. and it was about whether they actually — and it was about whether they actually got to work afterwards at ten brm~ — actually got to work afterwards at ten p:m.. interesting as i'm probably... _ ten p:m.. interesting as i'm probably... you're probably better upon _ probably... you're probably better upon this— probably... you're probably better upon this but i cannot recall which date you _ upon this but i cannot recall which date you were in lot and while this was happening so was it the same time _ was happening so was it the same time as the — was happening so was it the same time as the other parties? but durham — time as the other parties? but durham police have said that they have looked at the video and that he does not _ have looked at the video and that he does not appear to be any rules broken — does not appear to be any rules broken so— does not appear to be any rules broken. so difficult because you sort of— broken. so difficult because you sort of almost want to sayjust look at everything and then the other part of— at everything and then the other part of you goes, yes, but then if they've _ part of you goes, yes, but then if they've already looked at it and decided — they've already looked at it and decided there are no rules broken and probably other things they really— and probably other things they really ought to be getting on with more _ really ought to be getting on with more i_ really ought to be getting on with more. i don't know, ijust threw up my more. idon't know, ijust threw up my hands— more. i don't know, ijust threw up my hands with this thing really. i cannot— my hands with this thing really. i cannot think of anything to say. we were in cannot think of anything to say. were in tier 2 cannot think of anything to say. - were in tier 2 restrictions at the time of this event in durham. there is no doubt the daily mail wants to

turn your gate into the labour equipment of party gate. how much headway are they making? it is true that keir starmer is certainly in interviews i heard this morning did repeatedly avoid answering whether to replacement back in touch with him about the event. i to replacement back in touch with him about the event.— to replacement back in touch with him about the event. i think worth ”ointin him about the event. i think worth pointing out _ him about the event. i think worth pointing out this _ him about the event. i think worth pointing out this story _ him about the event. i think worth pointing out this story is _ him about the event. i think worth pointing out this story is not - him about the event. i think worth pointing out this story is not new. | pointing out this story is not new. it was _ pointing out this story is not new. it was servicing at the beginning of the year— it was servicing at the beginning of the year when there were lots of serious — the year when there were lots of serious party gate allegations facing — serious party gate allegations facing borisjohnson and serious party gate allegations facing boris johnson and thing about the bring _ facing boris johnson and thing about the bring your own booze trestle table _ the bring your own booze trestle table party at the garden and the alleged _ table party at the garden and the alleged party in the downing street flap. alleged party in the downing street flab and _ alleged party in the downing street flap. and at the time when people were pointing and saying keir starmer— were pointing and saying keir starmer get a beer, it had very little _ starmer get a beer, it had very little traction. i think what has changed — little traction. i think what has changed is it means a story is getting — changed is it means a story is getting more attention paid is the fact that — getting more attention paid is the fact that the only party borchard has been — fact that the only party borchard has been fined for and there could be more _ has been fined for and there could be more if— has been fined for and there could be more if but the only one so far in terms — be more if but the only one so far in terms of— be more if but the only one so far in terms of the fixed penalty notice involves _ in terms of the fixed penalty notice involves cake in the office between

meetings _ involves cake in the office between meetings and i think many would say on the _ meetings and i think many would say on the scale — meetings and i think many would say on the scale of a potential macro —— covid-i9 _ on the scale of a potential macro —— covid—19 breach humans is less and the other events that means the comparisons between that and keir starmer— comparisons between that and keir starmer having a break to have a beer— starmer having a break to have a beer and — starmer having a break to have a beer and you could say borisjust had a _ beer and you could say borisjust had a great advocate. i think a more difficult _ had a great advocate. i think a more difficult labour but it does not help _ difficult labour but it does not help they have not got their facts straight _ help they have not got their facts straight is — help they have not got their facts straight is a van to go back on a few things — straight is a van to go back on a few things such as angela rayner with questions about the appetite to keep going for it. at the very least you could — keep going for it. at the very least you could said this is a really unhelpful— you could said this is a really unhelpful distraction for keir starmer, the fact that he did interviews this morning on radio for and others — interviews this morning on radio for and others and this dominated and he could really— and others and this dominated and he could really move on from it. i think— could really move on from it. i think it does show that it is coming at a time _ think it does show that it is coming at a time which is unhelpful to labour— at a time which is unhelpful to labour and really the sense is the tories _ labour and really the sense is the tories will— labour and really the sense is the tories will do badly in most expect them _ tories will do badly in most expect them to— tories will do badly in most expect them to do— tories will do badly in most expect them to do better this week and therefore — them to do better this week and therefore the presses on keir starmer— therefore the presses on keir starmer to have a good result and he could _ starmer to have a good result and he could suffer — starmer to have a good result and he could suffer from high expectations of this—

could suffer from high expectations of this is— could suffer from high expectations of this is bad timing. not going to shift the _ of this is bad timing. not going to shift the doll massively i would say but it _ shift the doll massively i would say but it is— shift the doll massively i would say but it is unhelpful for him in many ways _ but it is unhelpful for him in many wa s. �* , ., but it is unhelpful for him in many was. �*, ., ., ., but it is unhelpful for him in many wa s. �*, ., ., .,., but it is unhelpful for him in many was. �*, ., ., , , ways. let's move onto a completely different story _ ways. let's move onto a completely different story in _ ways. let's move onto a completely different story in the _ ways. let's move onto a completely different story in the times - ways. let's move onto a completely different story in the times is - ways. let's move onto a completely different story in the times is as - different story in the times is as know from the last hour, you did not go to university, but i am interested in your views privately educated to lose places at 0xbridge. this is comments made by the vice—chancellor at cambridge in his morning independent schools. i read this and i'm wondering how much this is actually going to be news for some parents because the number of private school pupils getting into oxbridge has been falling in recent years. in oxbridge has been falling in recent ears. , ., y oxbridge has been falling in recent ears. , ., , ., , ., years. in the story about state school pupils _ years. in the story about state school pupils now _ years. in the story about state school pupils now make - years. in the story about state school pupils now make up - years. in the story about statel school pupils now make up 7296 years. in the story about state - school pupils now make up 7296 of school pupils now make up 72% of cambridge university, or it was last year and this is the vice chancellor at cambridge saying you are just going to have to accept if you went

to private school that is not a shoo—in. interesting one because i was talking to somebody in the other day and whose shout us trying to get into one of these oxbridge universities and they were talking about how they are having to have this extra tutoring to get through the actual chat and i did not realise there was an interview that took place when it goes to show out of the loop i am. but you have after tutoring and all that sort of stuff in the point is if you go to a state school and are on free school meals, the last thing you can afford is extra tutoring and anything at all. at the moment as we know with the cost of living going through the roof. even more unlikely that you were going to get any extra tutoring but you are right, your question was do you think anybody will be surprised from private schools and i suppose the issue might be about

parents who may be our put people through and putting children through private schools at a great cost to themselves and were thinking what if themselves and were thinking what if the flipping point than? thea;r themselves and were thinking what if the flipping point than?— the flipping point than? they may be askin: that the flipping point than? they may be asking that question _ the flipping point than? they may be asking that question and _ the flipping point than? they may be asking that question and i _ the flipping point than? they may be asking that question and i think- asking that question and i think there's an interesting point and she made a point about poor pupils there perhaps on free school meals but the bottom line if there are plenty of skate school shooter who come from very wealthy homes and actually this is not necessarily addressing the question of class, which isjust is not necessarily addressing the question of class, which is just as important as wealth in this debate. interesting in the interview they had a _ interesting in the interview they had a student who makes the point that actually you want to look at things— that actually you want to look at things like free school meal eligibility and also grammar school recruitment because focusing on intake _ recruitment because focusing on intake from state schools alone as he intake from state schools alone as be just _ intake from state schools alone as he just touched on is not such an effective — he just touched on is not such an effective indicator of wealth or social— effective indicator of wealth or social class and for example thing about _

social class and for example thing about catchment areas and after tutoring — about catchment areas and after tutoring or perhaps your parents political — tutoring or perhaps your parents political beliefs is going to mean that is— political beliefs is going to mean that is not as clear cut. i think in general— that is not as clear cut. i think in general people would expect a number of private school people start to go down _ of private school people start to go down and _ of private school people start to go down and you i think there was a general— down and you i think there was a general sense it probably suggest that things are going in the right direction — that things are going in the right direction for state school pupils getting — direction for state school pupils getting in but not to say that privately educated people should not be able _ privately educated people should not be able to— privately educated people should not be able to get into these but i think— be able to get into these but i think if— be able to get into these but i think if you look historically at a ratio of— think if you look historically at a ratio of private school educated pupils _ ratio of private school educated pupils in — ratio of private school educated pupils in these establishments compared to the percentage of privately school pupils compared to state schooled, these percentages are not— state schooled, these percentages are not evenly fronting that anyways. are not evenly fronting that anyways-— are not evenly fronting that an a s. , ., , anyways. only a minute left but i feel in some _ anyways. only a minute left but i feel in some ways _ anyways. only a minute left but i feel in some ways is _ anyways. only a minute left but i feel in some ways is not - anyways. only a minute left but i feel in some ways is not limited. anyways. only a minute left but i. feel in some ways is not limited to do justice to the story on the front page of the guardian which is about the leaked document suggesting the supreme court is about to overturn a law protecting the right to abortion in the us but i would like to have both of your views on it. just in 30

seconds, sorry. mr; both of your views on it. just in 30 seconds. sorry-— seconds, sorry. my goodness, it's historic. seconds, sorry. my goodness, it's historic- a — seconds, sorry. my goodness, it's historic. a historic _ seconds, sorry. my goodness, it's historic. a historic moment - seconds, sorry. my goodness, it's historic. a historic moment is - seconds, sorry. my goodness, it's historic. a historic moment is all. seconds, sorry. my goodness, it's historic. a historic moment is all i would say about that and it will be very interesting to see how it pans out. , ., , , . ., out. the protest picture on the front of the — out. the protest picture on the front of the guardian _ out. the protest picture on the front of the guardian just - out. the protest picture on the| front of the guardian just sums out. the protest picture on the . front of the guardian just sums up how fraught the issue is. i front of the guardian just sums up how fraught the issue is.— how fraught the issue is. i think worth pointing _ how fraught the issue is. i think worth pointing out _ how fraught the issue is. i think worth pointing out there - how fraught the issue is. i think worth pointing out there is - how fraught the issue is. i think worth pointing out there is no i how fraught the issue is. i think i worth pointing out there is no final judgment. — worth pointing out there is no final judgment, is a link suggest a direction _ judgment, is a link suggest a direction is going in favour of ultimately changing the rights and to the _ ultimately changing the rights and to the states on the individual and i to the states on the individual and i would _ to the states on the individual and i would imagine that is going to be a bi- i would imagine that is going to be a big factor in the coming up votes in america — a big factor in the coming up votes in america givenjoe biden has any plans— in america givenjoe biden has any plans to fight this to make sure women — plans to fight this to make sure women retain their right to choose. so it would — women retain their right to choose. so it would not have longer talk about that but really good to get your thoughts and and lovely to have you both with us. that is it. the papers will be back again tomorrow evening with anna mikhailova, who's the deputy political editor at the mail on sunday,

and sienna rodgers, senior writer for the house magazine. dojoin us then if you can but for now, from me, until the next time, goodnight. earlier tonight, here on bbc news, we brought you a debate between the five main parties' leaders in northern ireland ahead of thursday's assembly election. you can watch that programme again on the iplayer. for more reaction to the debate, here's bbc newsline's tara mills. let's hear from some of the smaller parties now starting with the tuv leaderjim allister. you are very welcome to the programme. did you watch the debate? what did you make of it? i thought it was a perfect illustration of why the system of government will never work. there was not one line of agreement. all you had with squabble. and these are our parties of government so called, and that of course is but a microcosm

of the executive itself. there are two fundamental reasons why this executive will never work. one of them is they don't have to be agreed on anything in order to be in government. it's no surprise when they are in government, they cannot agree as they could not agree tonight. and secondly sinn fein are not there to make northern ireland work. that's the added toxic element. i think that when we go to vote on thursday, it's quite appalling that all that is an offer is more of the same. some might have watched it tonight and thought i said the other parties were in agreement, but the dup were the outsider. i'm sorry. surely the fundamental agreement across the world is that those who are in government are those who are agreed what they are going to do about health, education, etc,

but we have this absurd system in northern ireland called mandatory coalition, so we don't have to agree about anything. because of the agreement... doesn't make it any better. on thursday the people of northern ireland appallingly are not allowed to change the government. they are not allowed to vote any of these parties out of the government no matter how much they have failed and you had a collective failure tonight. and that's because if these parties hold onto a clutch of malaise, they are entitled to a right to be in the government without being a real anything. the other thing disappointing about the debate was neither jeffrey donaldson nor doug beatty spelled out why the protocol is anathema to unionism, so let me do it. it is anathema because the protocol to create and operates on the basis on the basis that gb, the other part of this united kingdom, is a foreign country. now that is something no unionist can ever bear of course the goods from gb are subject

to checks at the post and my party has always said the protocol must go and at the protocol now is the price of stormont, and if amending it if the price of stormont, then that is a price no unionist can pay or ever should pay. limited time but we have to ask what you think about be the protocol and given what you said about the dup, is this a moment of truth for the tuv? if you don't increase the number of seats, are you finished? the bbc is succeeded on the finishing of the tuv and i think that's a commentary on bbc more than the tuv, but i believe in the electorate. people are happy with what they've got and vote for the same again, they will get more the same and won't be disappointed. they will get lots of squander, lots of failure but if they realise that particularly on the protocol they devoted call them up her strength and i would assume that they were voted tuv. thank you much indeed forjoining us. i'm joined now by the green party leader. being held to ransom others national politics— being held to ransom others national politics of— being held to ransom others national politics of division and delay yet again _ politics of division and delay yet again. and from the very same

parties — again. and from the very same parties who have been the executive party for _ parties who have been the executive party for decades now. walking us i’ilht party for decades now. walking us right into — party for decades now. walking us right into the multi crisis that people — right into the multi crisis that people are really facing and what we are hearing on the doors over and over— are hearing on the doors over and over again right across all constituencies is people want the focus _ constituencies is people want the focus to— constituencies is people want the focus to be on the cost of that is spiralling — focus to be on the cost of that is spiralling out of control completely and they— spiralling out of control completely and they want measures put in place it will— and they want measures put in place it will help _ and they want measures put in place it will help protect them. there and they want measures put in place it will help protect them.— it will help protect them. there was a lot of talk — it will help protect them. there was a lot of talk about _ it will help protect them. there was a lot of talk about that _ it will help protect them. there was a lot of talk about that tonight - it will help protect them. there was a lot of talk about that tonight so i a lot of talk about that tonight so are you saying there are people there you could not work with an executive or the assembly? brute there you could not work with an executive or the assembly? we can alwa s executive or the assembly? we can always work — executive or the assembly? we can always work with _ executive or the assembly? we can always work with anybody _ executive or the assembly? we can always work with anybody and - executive or the assembly? we can always work with anybody and i - executive or the assembly? we can | always work with anybody and i think we have _ always work with anybody and i think we have a _ always work with anybody and i think we have a good record of showing that already. but what people want is all parties get by the needs and tackle _ is all parties get by the needs and tackle the — is all parties get by the needs and tackle the cost—of—living crisis so the green party for example are calling _ the green party for example are calling for— the green party for example are calling for the immediate 20 pal uplift _ calling for the immediate 20 pal uplift and universal credit for example _ uplift and universal credit for example and we want to sleep rent controls _ example and we want to sleep rent controls in — example and we want to sleep rent controls in place because even now across _ controls in place because even now across northern ireland, even social housing _ across northern ireland, even social housing is— across northern ireland, even social housing is becoming so unaffordable for so _ housing is becoming so unaffordable for so many and we want to see the

living _ for so many and we want to see the living wage — for so many and we want to see the living wage implemented across northern ireland as well. and that will be _ northern ireland as well. and that will be sent with a living wage foundation so there are measures we can take _ foundation so there are measures we can take in _ foundation so there are measures we can take in the very short term as well as— can take in the very short term as well as work— can take in the very short term as well as work towards longer strategies and longer plans for making — strategies and longer plans for making a — strategies and longer plans for making a sustainable future and much more resilient to any of the shots again— more resilient to any of the shots again in— more resilient to any of the shots again in the future.— again in the future. sorry to interrupt — again in the future. sorry to interrupt but _ again in the future. sorry to interrupt but limited - again in the future. sorry to interrupt but limited time . again in the future. sorry to i interrupt but limited time but again in the future. sorry to - interrupt but limited time but you did not get your legislation through there is some would say is a watered—down version in terms of the climate change bill and is that political failure? climate change bill and is that politicalfailure? brute climate change bill and is that political failure?— climate change bill and is that political failure? we are going forward on — political failure? we are going forward on a _ political failure? we are going forward on a record _ political failure? we are going forward on a record of- political failure? we are going i forward on a record of delivering with two— forward on a record of delivering with two backbench mla is in the green _ with two backbench mla is in the green party have been plunging well above _ green party have been plunging well above our— green party have been plunging well above our weight. we've introduced three _ above our weight. we've introduced three bills _ above our weight. we've introduced three bills and the safe leave it till -- — three bills and the safe leave it till -- for— three bills and the safe leave it till —— for victims of domestic abuse — till —— for victims of domestic abuse in _ till —— for victims of domestic abuse in the safe access to for women — abuse in the safe access to for women seeking access to abortion health— women seeking access to abortion health care and introduced the climate — health care and introduced the climate bill as a pma but did that with cross — climate bill as a pma but did that with cross party support and cross party working in what we delivered was a _ party working in what we delivered was a bill— party working in what we delivered was a bill that we could all agree on and _ was a bill that we could all agree on and that we all amended and the ministry— on and that we all amended and the ministry was playing catch up with.

it's ministry was playing catch up with. it's a _ ministry was playing catch up with. it's a great — ministry was playing catch up with. it's a great starting point and what we need _ it's a great starting point and what we need now is to see it delivered and we believe the solution for him would've _ and we believe the solution for him would've the council of the crisis that we — would've the council of the crisis that we are _ would've the council of the crisis that we are experiencing right now live in— that we are experiencing right now live in the — that we are experiencing right now live in the full delivery of dealing with climate change across this island — with climate change across this island and across these i and in favour— island and across these i and in favour of— island and across these i and in favour of producing eight sustainable way of life not just surviving — sustainable way of life not just surviving but thrive. sustainable way of life not 'ust surviving but thrivei sustainable way of life not 'ust surviving but thrive. thank you very much indeed _ surviving but thrive. thank you very much indeed but _ surviving but thrive. thank you very much indeed but we _ surviving but thrive. thank you very much indeed but we are _ surviving but thrive. thank you very much indeed but we are totally - surviving but thrive. thank you very much indeed but we are totally out| much indeed but we are totally out of time, thank you. a short time ago, the people before profit gave his reaction to the debate tonight. i thought it was pretty uninspiring. we have _ i thought it was pretty uninspiring. we have to — i thought it was pretty uninspiring. we have to talk _ i thought it was pretty uninspiring. we have to talk about _ i thought it was pretty uninspiring. we have to talk about the - we have to talk about the cost—of—living _ we have to talk about the cost—of—living crisis - we have to talk about the cost—of—living crisis but. we have to talk about the l cost—of—living crisis but you we have to talk about the - cost—of—living crisis but you know most _ cost—of—living crisis but you know most forget — cost—of—living crisis but you know most forget that _ cost—of—living crisis but you know most forget that these _ cost—of—living crisis but you know most forget that these parties . cost—of—living crisis but you know| most forget that these parties sat in the _ most forget that these parties sat in the executive _ most forget that these parties sat in the executive up _ most forget that these parties sat in the executive up until- most forget that these parties sat in the executive up until a - most forget that these parties sat in the executive up until a few- in the executive up until a few months — in the executive up until a few months ago _ in the executive up until a few months ago and _ in the executive up until a few months ago and many - in the executive up until a few months ago and many of - in the executive up until a few| months ago and many of them in the executive up until a few- months ago and many of them have been _ months ago and many of them have been on _ months ago and many of them have been on the — months ago and many of them have been on the executive _ months ago and many of them have been on the executive for _ months ago and many of them have been on the executive for decades i months ago and many of them havel been on the executive for decades to come _ been on the executive for decades to come in _ been on the executive for decades to come in for— been on the executive for decades to come in for years _ been on the executive for decades to come in for years. and _ been on the executive for decades to come in for years. and there - been on the executive for decades to come in for years. and there was - come in for years. and there was some talk— come in for years. and there was some talk about _ come in for years. and there was some talk about the _ come in for years. and there was. some talk about the cost—of—living crisis _ some talk about the cost—of—living crisis but _ some talk about the cost—of—living crisis but no — some talk about the cost—of—living crisis but no understanding - some talk about the cost—of—living crisis but no understanding or- crisis but no understanding or admission— crisis but no understanding or admission that _ crisis but no understanding or admission that these - crisis but no understanding or admission that these partiesl crisis but no understanding or. admission that these parties are culpable — admission that these parties are

culpable in — admission that these parties are culpable in making _ admission that these parties are culpable in making life - admission that these parties are culpable in making life harder. admission that these parties arei culpable in making life harder for people — culpable in making life harder for people a— culpable in making life harder for people. a situation _ culpable in making life harder for people. a situation where - culpable in making life harder for. people. a situation where ministers were are _ people. a situation where ministers were are forcing _ people. a situation where ministers were are forcing a _ people. a situation where ministers were are forcing a pay— people. a situation where ministers were are forcing a pay cut _ people. a situation where ministers were are forcing a pay cut for - were are forcing a pay cut for workers _ were are forcing a pay cut for workers down _ were are forcing a pay cut for workers down their— were are forcing a pay cut for workers down their throats . were are forcing a pay cut for l workers down their throats and obviously— workers down their throats and obviously we _ workers down their throats and obviously we are _ workers down their throats and obviously we are seeing - workers down their throats and obviously we are seeing the - workers down their throats and i obviously we are seeing the result in action— obviously we are seeing the result in action many— obviously we are seeing the result in action many people _ obviously we are seeing the result in action many people taking - obviously we are seeing the resultj in action many people taking strict action— in action many people taking strict action and — in action many people taking strict action and i— in action many people taking strict action and i was _ in action many people taking strict action and i was very _ in action many people taking strict action and i was very proud - in action many people taking strict action and i was very proud to - in action many people taking strict i action and i was very proud to stand with others— action and i was very proud to stand with others today _ action and i was very proud to stand with others today and _ action and i was very proud to stand with others today and the _ action and i was very proud to stand with others today and the last - action and i was very proud to stand with others today and the last few l with others today and the last few weeks _ with others today and the last few weeks we were _ with others today and the last few weeks we were actually— with others today and the last few weeks we were actually taking - with others today and the last few i weeks we were actually taking action on the _ weeks we were actually taking action on the front— weeks we were actually taking action on the front line _ weeks we were actually taking action on the front line battle _ weeks we were actually taking action on the front line battle against - weeks we were actually taking action on the front line battle against the l on the front line battle against the cost of living — on the front line battle against the cost of living crisis, _ on the front line battle against the cost of living crisis, against- on the front line battle against the cost of living crisis, against a - cost of living crisis, against a position— cost of living crisis, against a position of— cost of living crisis, against a position of low— cost of living crisis, against a position of low inflation - cost of living crisis, against a position of low inflation payi position of low inflation pay officers _ position of low inflation pay officers by _ position of low inflation pay officers by ministers. - position of low inflation pay officers by ministers. so . position of low inflation pay officers by ministers. so i l position of low inflation pay- officers by ministers. so i think the only— officers by ministers. so i think the only reason _ officers by ministers. so i think the only reason why _ officers by ministers. so i think the only reason why there - officers by ministers. so i think the only reason why there wasl officers by ministers. so i think- the only reason why there was some talk about— the only reason why there was some talk about a — the only reason why there was some talk about a cost _ the only reason why there was some talk about a cost of— the only reason why there was some talk about a cost of living _ the only reason why there was some talk about a cost of living crisis - talk about a cost of living crisis is because _ talk about a cost of living crisis is because we _ talk about a cost of living crisis is because we are _ talk about a cost of living crisis is because we are in _ talk about a cost of living crisis is because we are in the - talk about a cost of living crisis| is because we are in the middle talk about a cost of living crisis i is because we are in the middle of election — is because we are in the middle of election in— is because we are in the middle of election. , ,., , ., is because we are in the middle of election. , , ., , election. in response to debate this evenin: election. in response to debate this evening and — election. in response to debate this evening and to _ election. in response to debate this evening and to have _ election. in response to debate this evening and to have said _ election. in response to debate this evening and to have said we - election. in response to debate this evening and to have said we had . election. in response to debate this evening and to have said we had 15| evening and to have said we had 15 years of these five executive parties in power and they have delivered a collapsed executive and north— south ministerial council, a waiting list for housing doubling and they had put one in seven people on hospital waiting lists for over a

year and created a £750 million hole in the education budget. the party further stated that they were heartbroken over it legalised abortion up until birth for children with disabilities. a full list of all the candidates standing in the election thursday can be found on the bc northern ireland website. hello there. after generally cloudy skies over the past few days, wednesday brings the promise of something brighter. more sunshine on the cards, but with that, we could trigger some heavy, thundery downpours. so, a generally cloudy start to the day on wednesday. we'll see patchy outbreaks of rain shifting eastwards. brighter skies will feed in as we move through the day from the west, and with that sunshine, we could see those heavy, thundery downpours, particularly for eastern parts of scotland, northe east england, the midlands, down central and southern england. and with more in the way of sunshine, it will be warmer, highs around 12—17 degrees celsius. 0vernight, we'll see those showers fading away across england and wales, patchy cloud and clear spells here.

cloudier skies feeding in, though, across northern ireland and scotland with some patchy outbreaks of rain. the temperatures overnight not falling too far at all. 0vernight low sitting generally in the high single figures. a warmer day still across england and wales, with temperatures in the south east reaching highs of 21, perhaps 22 degrees celsius. cloudier to the north and west.

�*welcome to newsday, reporting live from singapore, i'm karishma vaswani. the headlines. protests in the united states after a leaked document suggests the supreme court is about to overturn the law protecting the right to abortion the draft�*s release has caused a wave of reaction from both sides. the us senate majority leader says he'll hold a symbolic vote to put the right to an abortion into federal law. also on the programme — rescued after more than 60 days trapped underground in ukraine more than 100 civilians — including children — who've spent weeks living beneath the besieged steel plant in mariupol finally reach safety.