Skip to main content

tv   The Papers  BBC News  May 13, 2022 10:30pm-10:46pm BST

10:30 pm
and it's made him a star. you've got a few fans around here at the moment. how does it feel? i'm super happy about all the support. because italian people are super warming, super lovely. and five minutes later... this is what eurovision fame feels like. i've got to get out of this! however, the favourites remain ukraine. their song and anthem of national struggle. ukraine. their song and anthem of nationalstruggle. but ukraine. their song and anthem of national struggle. but for ukraine. their song and anthem of nationalstruggle. but forsome, there is real hope he will be close behind. no one is expecting another nil points. david sillito, bbc news, turin. that's it.
10:31 pm
hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. joining me tonight... good to see you both again, thank you very much forjoining us tonight. let's have a look at tomorrow's front pages and bring you up to speed. the i has details of a drug test that has halved breast cancer cases and women who are post—menopause. the nhs is planning to roll it out on a wider basis. the ft lead is tech tycoon putting his billion—dollar bid to buy twitter on hold. the wagatha christie trial, and the revelation that she's put up with her husband in 2017. the government will scrap
10:32 pm
plans to ban cheap deals on unhealthy foods, that's according to the express in a move to tackle the cost—of—living crisis. take a brief smile, the ministerfor cost—of—living crisis. take a brief smile, the minister for efficiency is intensifying his campaign against civil servants working from home, published tomorrow, he claims staff may be using it to think long weekends and stay—at—home and the weather is looking good. according to the times, nadeem is saying the country should be proud of its private schools and shouldn't change a mission procedure is to try to get my state pupils into the two universities. the guardian carries a warning being able to buy cheap food and supermarkets are over, the son's front pages dominated by a picture of the bbc podcast or being handed her game head. is that what you collect? by prince william just a day after it was announced that she was being given it. i don't know
10:33 pm
what you think, ijust was being given it. i don't know what you think, i just wonder with both of you, whether you think as well, they're dame hoods because it was knighthoods and, welcome it's got to be the same as the blokes. it's a funny old word. we believe that one for later. let's kick off at the guardian, if we may. we thank you muted. at the guardian, if we may. we thank ou muted. ~ ., , at the guardian, if we may. we thank you muted._ that's - at the guardian, if we may. we thank you muted._ that's all- you muted. apologies. that's all ri . ht, you muted. apologies. that's all right. that _ you muted. apologies. that's all right. that you — you muted. apologies. that's all right, that you are. _ you muted. apologies. that's all right, that you are. lovely, - you muted. apologies. that's all right, that you are. lovely, fire i right, that you are. lovely, fire away. right, that you are. lovely, fire awa . , ., , right, that you are. lovely, fire awa . , . , ., ., away. they have been warned that the olden era away. they have been warned that the golden era of — away. they have been warned that the golden era of cheap _ away. they have been warned that the golden era of cheap food _ away. they have been warned that the golden era of cheap food is _ away. they have been warned that the golden era of cheap food is now - away. they have been warned that the golden era of cheap food is now well l golden era of cheap food is now well and truly over. more bleak warnings of this cost—of—living crisis that people across the country are already struggling with and we are hearing that things are going to get even worse. we heard the boss of sainsbury�*s getting an interview with the guardian highlighting the fact that, you know, the ukraine crisis has caused the price of food
10:34 pm
to spiral and it's been quite a few days if you are already struggling to make ends meet, because we paid a lot for ministers, including the likes of the conservative mp, lee anderson, essentially saying that, you know, poorer households need to learn how to budget better in order to survive and as little as 30 tenths, but within that piece, we also heard that they are about two and a five british adults already that are having to cut back on their food shopping in order to get to buy every single day, which is awfully bleak fire britain every single day, which is awfully bleakfire britain in every single day, which is awfully bleak fire britain in 2022. every single day, which is awfully bleakfire britain in 2022. it every single day, which is awfully bleak fire britain in 2022. it comes at the same time as borisjohnson who has delayed a ban on cheap food essentially to help people survive during these difficult times, you know, he only had this emergency cost—of—living crisis committee with his cabinet ministers earlier this week and it begs the question what has the government been doing for the last three months at least when
10:35 pm
we have been hearing from economists of how difficult it's going to be for people across the country. i don't know if you want to talk about the guardian's stray, on the front of the express as was mentioned there, we don't have much of the details, but it suggests that a revolt of conservative mps is one explanation for the scrapping of what are two—for—one deals because of concerns about obesity. i what are two-for-one deals because of concerns about obesity.— of concerns about obesity. i think it was always _ of concerns about obesity. i think it was always a _ of concerns about obesity. i think it was always a controversial - it was always a controversial pr0posal _ it was always a controversial proposal in the conservative party, because _ proposal in the conservative party, because it — proposal in the conservative party, because it goes against the right to choose _ because it goes against the right to choose and keep costs down in the consumers — choose and keep costs down in the consumers pocket, so it was always a tricky _ consumers pocket, so it was always a tricky policy _ consumers pocket, so it was always a tricky policy for the prime minister, but i think he pushed it as an _ minister, but i think he pushed it as an anti—obesity measure, and that was part— as an anti—obesity measure, and that was part of— as an anti—obesity measure, and that was part of his own, you know, conversion _ was part of his own, you know, conversion to cutting sugar in the
10:36 pm
foods— conversion to cutting sugar in the foods and — conversion to cutting sugar in the foods and getting government to intervene to make things healthier. this was— intervene to make things healthier. this was part of getting rid of these — this was part of getting rid of these buy one get one free deals, also different restrictions on advertising suites in supermarkets and that— advertising suites in supermarkets and that kind of thing. but i think the conservative party was never that happy with it anyway and i think— that happy with it anyway and i think in— that happy with it anyway and i think in the middle of the cost crisis. — think in the middle of the cost crisis. il— think in the middle of the cost crisis, it reallyjust had to go, so it's a _ crisis, it reallyjust had to go, so it's a temporary extension before it's a temporary extension before it's introduced him i think it's probably— it's introduced him i think it's probably quite unlikely now that these _ probably quite unlikely now that these measures will come in. the difficulty with _ these measures will come in. tie: difficulty with all of this is that as chapman rowe was saying in the bbc news channel a few weeks ago when he interviewed her, it's not even just a kind when he interviewed her, it's not evenjust a kind of when he interviewed her, it's not even just a kind of choice where everything is become more expensive, it's everything that's become more expensive, so even if you go for the most economic option, it is still going to be significantly more expensive than it was a year or 18 months ago. expensive than it was a year or 18 months ago-— expensive than it was a year or 18 months ago. yes, and jack munroe has hi . hli . hted months ago. yes, and jack munroe has highlighted time _ months ago. yes, and jack munroe has highlighted time and _ months ago. yes, and jack munroe has highlighted time and time _ months ago. yes, and jack munroe has highlighted time and time again - months ago. yes, and jack munroe has highlighted time and time again that i highlighted time and time again that
10:37 pm
sadly people on the tightest budgets, people with not much money in their pockets are the best economists, and that is just a straight fact, really, because they have to watch every single penny committee have to monitor how much they are eating, how much they've got left for the rest of the day, and many people with children as well, they're having to essentially make sure that their children are not going hungry to school, even though we have heard that being the case for many families since prices increased last month, so it's a difficult and i don't think, really, the conservatives really understand the conservatives really understand the true scale of what people are going through. simply to go to step that next contract and have a quick meeting and essentially say that fully get the picture, i really hope the prime minister is really listening to people's case studies that are being shared and paper is you know, people taking to twitter to express just how distressed they really are. things are going to get
10:38 pm
worse. bills are on the rise later this year and we are on the hearing of rishi sunak mulling about increasing measure is to help people and quite frankly, it'sjust increasing measure is to help people and quite frankly, it's just going to be a little bit too late. i and quite frankly, it'sjust going to be a little bit too late.- to be a little bit too late. i don't know what you _ to be a little bit too late. i don't know what you thought - to be a little bit too late. i don't know what you thought of - to be a little bit too late. i don't know what you thought of the l to be a little bit too late. i don't i know what you thought of the little news in brief on the bottom left of the financial times story. it's intriguing illustration of the impact this has and the reasons why some of these products are going up, and of course, part of it, part of the story here is the russian ukrainian conflict.— the story here is the russian ukrainian conflict. there's not enou:h ukrainian conflict. there's not enough a _ ukrainian conflict. there's not enough a lot _ ukrainian conflict. there's not enough a lot of— ukrainian conflict. there's not enough a lot of information, | ukrainian conflict. there's not i enough a lot of information, but basicaily— enough a lot of information, but basically the ft says that fish and chip shops — basically the ft says that fish and chip shops are under pressure because — chip shops are under pressure because they cannot get a hold of russian _ because they cannot get a hold of russian tide, so apparently they are offering _ russian tide, so apparently they are offering sea trout on the menu instead — offering sea trout on the menu instead. . �* , , offering sea trout on the menu instead. . �*, , ., . ., ., instead. that's very exotic for a chi - - , instead. that's very exotic for a chippy. isn't — instead. that's very exotic for a chippy. isn't it? _ instead. that's very exotic for a chippy, isn't it? it's _ instead. that's very exotic for a chippy, isn't it? it's not - instead. that's very exotic for a chippy, isn't it? it's not really l chippy, isn't it? it's not really what i would _ chippy, isn't it? it's not really what i would go _ chippy, isn't it? it's not really what i would go for _ chippy, isn't it? it's not really what i would go for if - chippy, isn't it? it's not really what i would go for if i - chippy, isn't it? it's not really what i would go for if i were l what i would go for if i were getting fish and chips, but we will all have _ getting fish and chips, but we will all have to adapt.— all have to adapt. laughter not the most _ all have to adapt. laughter not the most important - all have to adapt. laughter| not the most important issue all have to adapt. laughter i not the most important issue at all have to adapt. laughter - not the most important issue at the
10:39 pm
moment _ not the most important issue at the moment. ,, ., ., moment. quite. i though i wonder if sea trout is — moment. quite. i though i wonder if sea trout is really _ moment. quite. i though i wonder if sea trout is really cheaper _ moment. quite. i though i wonder if sea trout is really cheaper than - sea trout is really cheaper than russian tide? it's interesting, i was fascinated by this. —— russian cod. signs and supermarkets say it may not be what you are expecting, but we are still avoiding oils that cause allergy problems, but it's not that, because we can't get the oil. then we have price rises per week, again shortage is from ukraine used in batter. fertiliser shortage, which i didn't know anything about, comments apparently sent to push up the price of potatoes. even salt has gone up, so, you know, the economics is so much about the combination of ingredients and the guarantee of suoply, ingredients and the guarantee of supply, all of those things seem to be casted out. supply, all of those things seem to be casted out-— be casted out. yeah, it clearly is can i be casted out. yeah, it clearly is can i think _ be casted out. yeah, it clearly is can i think we — be casted out. yeah, it clearly is can i think we are _ be casted out. yeah, it clearly is can i think we are all— be casted out. yeah, it clearly is can i think we are all going - be casted out. yeah, it clearly is can i think we are all going to i be casted out. yeah, it clearly is i can i think we are all going to have to adapt, _ can i think we are all going to have to adapt, apparently we? we are going _ to adapt, apparently we? we are going to — to adapt, apparently we? we are going to have to change what we are used to— going to have to change what we are used to buying in a regular basis you know. — used to buying in a regular basis you know, mostly by the repertoire
10:40 pm
ofjusl_ you know, mostly by the repertoire ofiusl a _ you know, mostly by the repertoire of just a few you know, mostly by the repertoire ofjust a few meals, don't they, that they— ofjust a few meals, don't they, that they have every week, and they won't _ that they have every week, and they won't be _ that they have every week, and they won't be fine if those ingredients aren't— won't be fine if those ingredients aren't available. in the grand scheme _ aren't available. in the grand scheme of things you know, we are not in _ scheme of things you know, we are not in ukraine, so we can't really well— not in ukraine, so we can't really well too — not in ukraine, so we can't really well too much. it�*s not in ukraine, so we can't really well too much.— not in ukraine, so we can't really well too much. it's interesting can i well too much. it's interesting can i remember _ well too much. it's interesting can i remember seeing _ well too much. it's interesting can i remember seeing some - well too much. it's interesting can i remember seeing some figures l i remember seeing some figures suggest that the proportion of our income which we were spending on food has shrunk over the years from where it was in the 1950s to where it is now, but things like our housing how —— our housing costs have gone up significantly. somehow we are not better off. the daily mail, sam, and to be with the prime minister comey centre number this way, the economist had one today and he's got the front page of the mail tomorrow morning. titer; he's got the front page of the mail tomorrow morning.— tomorrow morning. they suggest wreckint tomorrow morning. they suggest wrecking for _ tomorrow morning. they suggest wrecking for pumps _ tomorrow morning. they suggest wrecking for pumps not - tomorrow morning. they suggest wrecking for pumps not a - tomorrow morning. they suggest wrecking for pumps not a great i tomorrow morning. they suggest - wrecking for pumps not a great move because _ wrecking for pumps not a great move because they spend the day, he recounts— because they spend the day, he recounts spending the day going
10:41 pm
between — recounts spending the day going between the fridge to hack off a chunk— between the fridge to hack off a chunk of— between the fridge to hack off a chunk of cheese and go to make a coffee _ chunk of cheese and go to make a coffee and — chunk of cheese and go to make a coffee and having a slow walk back to the _ coffee and having a slow walk back to the computer, so that is his reason — to the computer, so that is his reason for— to the computer, so that is his reason for wanting to get people back into — reason for wanting to get people back into the office. it has certainly _ back into the office. it has certainly caused a bit of upset among — certainly caused a bit of upset among civil servant unions who are, at the _ among civil servant unions who are, at the moment, quite resistant to forcing _ at the moment, quite resistant to forcing back into whitehall five days _ forcing back into whitehall five days a — forcing back into whitehall five days a week, there is a massive route _ days a week, there is a massive route going _ days a week, there is a massive route going on between ministers and the fda, _ route going on between ministers and the fda, which represents the most senior— the fda, which represents the most senior civil — the fda, which represents the most senior civil servants and other unions — senior civil servants and other unions involved about how many days a week— unions involved about how many days a week civil _ unions involved about how many days a week civil servants should be expected — a week civil servants should be expected to be in the office. i think— expected to be in the office. i think from the government has my point _ think from the government has my point of— think from the government has my point of view, what they want is to have _ point of view, what they want is to have people back at their desks because — have people back at their desks because obviously that has wider implications for the economy, certainly— implications for the economy, certainly the round, that great success — certainly the round, that great success story was obviously really badly— success story was obviously really badly hit — success story was obviously really badly hit when working from home was imposed _ badly hit when working from home was imposed because all those office workers — imposed because all those office workers went there to buy their tea
10:42 pm
and coffee, — workers went there to buy their tea and coffee, so there are these knock on implications for people working at home _ on implications for people working at home and making their own food and not _ at home and making their own food and not going to the shops. i think that's— and not going to the shops. i think that's part — and not going to the shops. i think that's part of why they want to make this drive _ that's part of why they want to make this drive back, but they also say prime minister says people are more creative. _ prime minister says people are more creative, more dynamic when they're back in— creative, more dynamic when they're back in the _ creative, more dynamic when they're back in the office and speaking to set in _ back in the office and speaking to set in their— back in the office and speaking to set in their bedroom as i am now speaking — set in their bedroom as i am now speaking to— set in their bedroom as i am now speaking to you. set in their bedroom as i am now speaking to you-— set in their bedroom as i am now speaking to you. obviously you've been going _ speaking to you. obviously you've been going back _ speaking to you. obviously you've been going back to _ speaking to you. obviously you've been going back to the _ speaking to you. obviously you've been going back to the office for i been going back to the office for quite a while now, yourjob is hard to get unless he physically meet people and that's true. what do you make of that? leaking that story into the front of the daily telegraph, which its main story headlines, jacob rees mike, the minister of efficiency three day week in the civil service. take companies — week in the civil service. take companies mike _ week in the civil service. take companies mike also - week in the civil service. “tag age: companies mike also criticise the civil servants for essentially thinking that mondays and fridays may be part of their weekend, more
10:43 pm
people need to be at their desks, but is also hoping that they can be at their desk in the office every single day of the working week, apparently there are civil servants mostly taking mondays and fridays and using that to work from home. most people are arguing that the benefits of co—that, the main things that we can take out of it as being able to work hybrid they, having some time at home, being able to be with family if we need to be, being able to take additional care and responsibility if we need to, as well as being at work, you know, we had the prime minister essentially claiming that many people have taken too many breaks, i beg to differ. i hope he is also going around the office and seeing how hard people are breaking. also, i mean, how hard people have been working and keeping things sticking along, notjust now, but throughout co. that, throughout the lockdown. it's almost insulting, really. but we have to make the most
10:44 pm
of hybrid working. we have to take these things forward. by, of hybrid working. we have to take these things forward. a, lot of hybrid working. we have to take these things forward.— these things forward. a lot of eo - le these things forward. a lot of people and — these things forward. a lot of people and tell _ these things forward. a lot of people and tell me _ these things forward. a lot of people and tell me how - these things forward. a lot of people and tell me how it's i people and tell me how it's transformed their attitude to family life and how much they feel they've gained, it's notjust dads, but mums as well and tends to be the dads are more likely to be the ones who don't have so much contact with their kids, particularly their young kids, and it's kind of change they experience a family life, they think, for the better, but we will see how the prime minister feels about it. sam, a quick point, picking up on this, all this talk aboutjobs being cut as part of the government's response to the cost of living crisis, has the government explain how that helps the cost—of—living crisis for the average voter if you're cutting over average voter if you're cutting over a number of years that big number of civil service jobs? a number of years that big number of civil servicejobs? it’s a number of years that big number of civil service jobs?— civil service “obs? it's tricky to itch civil service “obs? it's tricky to pitch that — civil service jobs? it's tricky to pitch that as _ civil service jobs? it's tricky to pitch that as an _ civil service jobs? it's tricky to pitch that as an immediate - pitch that as an immediate difference making measure, isn't it?
10:45 pm
it's obviously 91,000 jobs over three _ it's obviously 91,000 jobs over three years commencing obviously it saves _ three years commencing obviously it saves the _ three years commencing obviously it saves the government money, which they can _ saves the government money, which they can then put into other measures and that's what we want to -et measures and that's what we want to get them _ measures and that's what we want to get them up as you say, this is quite _ get them up as you say, this is quite a — get them up as you say, this is quite a long term thing, and it's obviously— quite a long term thing, and it's obviously going to be met with a lot of resistance from the unions, they are artie _ of resistance from the unions, they are artie talking about strike action, — are artie talking about strike action, so you know come i don't think— action, so you know come i don't think it's — action, so you know come i don't think it's going to be that kind of immediate hit that most families are looking _ immediate hit that most families are looking for— immediate hit that most families are looking for at the moment. the front .ae. looking for at the moment. the front tate of looking for at the moment. the front page of the — looking for at the moment. the front page of the telegraph, _ looking for at the moment. the front page of the telegraph, an intriguing| page of the telegraph, an intriguing story, natural gas, notwithstanding gas boilers and peoples homes in a few years, the government is environmentally stable and drink them i'm a bit baffled them apparently the eu has done it before. ~ , ., , , before. we seem to be filing easily on this, before. we seem to be filing easily on this. which _ before. we seem to be filing easily on this, which is _ before. we seem to be filing easily on this, which is not _ before. we seem to be filing easily on this, which is not something - before. we seem to be filing easily| on this, which is not something the government... apparently it's
10:46 pm
because certain, you know,

60 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on