threshold recklessly and that a high threshold get over. we recklessly and that a high threshold net over. ~ ~, recklessly and that a high threshold aet over. ~ a, a, a, , a, a, get over. we are going to give you a break to listen _ get over. we are going to give you a break to listen in. _ get over. we are going to give you a break to listen in. we _ get over. we are going to give you a break to listen in. we can _ get over. we are going to give you a break to listen in. we can see - get over. we are going to give you a break to listen in. we can see the i break to listen in. we can see the courtroom filling up quite substantially. we still have not seen the judge who is vital to these proceedings when we do see the judge coming of course we will be silent and listening to that. but they seem to be standing up now. it seems like it's is the moment the judge will be walking in and as they sit back down i'm assuming the camera will switch around. we will now listen in. regardless of the verdict, i will not tolerate any outburst whatsoever.—

ifi if i can have the attorneys approach for a moment. they just cut the sound feed theyjust cut the sound feed there in the courtroom as some discussions are taking place, if you're just joining us, we are awaiting moments away the verdict in the depp—heard defamation case democrat child that's been going on for six weeks, thejury has that's been going on for six weeks, the jury has reached a decision and we are waiting to hear that in this courtroom in virginia in the us any moment now. all right, ladies enjoyment of the

jury, what i need is to give the forms back to you. when you fine for a defamatory statement, one or more, you need to fill out the comments of tory damages, it has to be at least $1 and up to whatever you feel the damages should be. for punitive damages, you can put zero orfill that out there as well, but i need those filled out. if i can have you retire back to the deliberation room and do that for me. so we will be in recess until we hear back from them, don't go too far. thank you. in hear back from them, don't go too far. thank you.— hear back from them, don't go too far. thank you. in the words of the “udue far. thank you. in the words of the

judge there. _ far. thank you. in the words of the judge there, "don't _ far. thank you. in the words of the judge there, "don't go _ far. thank you. in the words of the judge there, "don't go too - far. thank you. in the words of the judge there, "don't go too far." i judge there, "don't go too far." this whole trial has been televised and, while they've injected just a moment's more drama and suspense to these proceedings, thejury receiving some instructions from the judge there to follow those instructions. so we still wait for the verdict. and we won't be the only people around the world watching these proceedings, many, many people are. let's speak to our correspondent greg mckenzie, who is one of those watching. greg, the global attention on this, regardless of what you think of it, has been asked ordinary. it of what you think of it, has been asked ordinary.— asked ordinary. it has indeed, a hollywood _ asked ordinary. it has indeed, a hollywood superstar _ asked ordinary. it has indeed, a hollywood superstar in - asked ordinary. it has indeed, a hollywood superstar in johnny l asked ordinary. it has indeed, a - hollywood superstar in johnny depp hollywood superstar injohnny depp and his former wife, amber heard. now the tension, billions of people watching on tiktok, some say a jury by tiktok, the hashtag has had billions of hits on that platform,

whereas the hashtag supporting amber heard, not so many. now on the flip side, both have received countless abuse threats, death threats, it's got quite serious in in terms of the hate towards both of them on both sides. so a six trial almost over, as you heard there, thejudge informing thejury to as you heard there, thejudge informing the jury to decide how much in damages because they haven't written that in their forms. so that is telling, we don't know what side it'll go, or if it will even go either side, it'll go, or if it will even go eitherside, it it'll go, or if it will even go either side, it could be dismissed. that will come back in the next few minutes. in terms of international attention, the court case was filmed every day, televised around the world, and i think a lot of people just said some days, they couldn't get enough of it. journalistically, factually, this is really a case about both accusing each other of ruining their careers, and ultimately it's played out in court and hearing details about that

relationship, that marriage that ended and who assaulted who, who abused who, and vice versa. so a very public case and many people coming to the defence of both of them over the last few weeks in court, most famously kate moss testified from her property in gloucester, testifying via video link to the claims that amber heard's team suggested johnny depp had pushed kate moss down the steps many years ago down democrat in the caribbean, she said it was not the case, she slipped, johnny depp came to the rescue, they made the story up to the rescue, they made the story up that he pushed her down the stairs. so testimony like that from all over the country, really, all overthe country, really, in support ofjohnny depp. so time will only tell in the next few minutes as to when the judge makes his decision

—— the decision in this case. we -- the decision in this case. we will hear _ -- the decision in this case. we will hear from _ —— the decision in this case. we will hear from the jury injust —— the decision in this case. we will hear from the jury in just a few minutes, as we just heard the judge saying to everyone in the courtroom, "don't go too far." interestingly she also said right at the beginning that this is a court of law, serious proceedings, this isn't a time for big reactions, and she preempted any reactions, emotional or otherwise, to what would be said in court. and it's a reminder of that balance — of course this is literally hollywood, these are hollywood stars, but actually this is also real life, and really painful and difficult tales of marriage in a picture painted of a pretty dysfunctional relationship at times, and actually some really sobering details we've heard over the last six weeks. we sobering details we've heard over the last six weeks.— sobering details we've heard over the last six weeks. we did indeed, details about _ the last six weeks. we did indeed, details about claims _ the last six weeks. we did indeed, details about claims that - the last six weeks. we did indeed,

details about claims that amber i details about claims that amber heard had attacked johnny depp in australia whilst he was filming parts of the caribbean, only for a surgeon to come into court to say thatjohnny depp's finger wasn't sliced were injured in any way, and comments about him writing and blood on a wall after that incident — details that were quite disturbing at times, some would say, but ultimately what looking and not the case, some would say it was a bit of a toxic relationship, and now it's being played out to the public to get an insight into the lives of hollywood a listers, which is something you don't often get privy to, but in this case it's not public. a member this is in the first time forjohnny depp, he was in the uk to defend a case which he lost —— isn't the first time. so for

both of them, it's really about their reputations and the damage, one would say, but ultimately both their legal councils have said that they both would wish this case to be over so that they can move on with their lives. now as forjohnny depp, he had been seen in the uk as of yesterday performing on stage at the royal albert hall with a music band, jeff beck, the british guitarist, he was performing in sheffield and at the royal albert hall kierland desk here in london. so we believe he is watching this on hold in the uk, as for amber heard we are sure she's still stateside as the result unfold. i still stateside as the result unfold. ., , ., ., , still stateside as the result unfold. ., , ., , , ,, unfold. i saw that photo johnny depp on staae, unfold. i saw that photo johnny depp on stage. just _ unfold. i saw that photo johnny depp on stage, just added _ unfold. i saw that photo johnny depp on stage, just added yet _ unfold. i saw that photo johnny depp on stage, just added yet another - on stage, just added yet another slightly surreal turn to this court case, and we did see amber heard in courtjust a few moments ago. thanks for much for that. i want to talk now to sean mandel, los

angeles—based entertainment reporter who's been following the trial. thinks for coming. my pleasure. the 're thinks for coming. my pleasure. they're making _ thinks for coming. my pleasure. they're making us _ thinks for coming. my pleasure. they're making us wait - thinks for coming. my pleasure. they're making us wait a - thinks for coming. my pleasure. they're making us wait a bit - thinks for coming. my pleasure. - they're making us wait a bit longer, aren't they?— aren't they? they are, and i think it's really telling _ aren't they? they are, and i think it's really telling that _ aren't they? they are, and i think it's really telling that we - aren't they? they are, and i think it's really telling that we know - aren't they? they are, and i think it's really telling that we know a l it's really telling that we know a little bit more now that there will be damages awarded, implying that the jury has found for either the defendant, heard or depp, given they both have defamation suits in this case. if they had not been the case, if the judge had case. if they had not been the case, if thejudge had not case. if they had not been the case, if the judge had not asked them to list specifically the compensation damages in terms of dollars, it would imply nobody had been found in favour of, that both the defamation suits had been thrown out.- suits had been thrown out. sean, that is excellent _ suits had been thrown out. sean, that is excellent detective - suits had been thrown out. sean, that is excellent detective skills- | that is excellent detective skills— if you are right, we don't quite know, it's a good theory at the moment. it sounds convincing to me, we will wait to see whether that comes true, but that's really interesting observation you make there. more broadly on the case

itself, whatever way you look at it, it's been an extraordinary six weeks. ~ , ,., , it's been an extraordinary six weeks. ~ ,,., , ., �* ~' weeks. absolutely. i don't think we've seen _ weeks. absolutely. i don't think we've seen a — weeks. absolutely. i don't think we've seen a celebrity - weeks. absolutely. i don't think we've seen a celebrity trial- weeks. absolutely. i don't think we've seen a celebrity trial like| we've seen a celebrity trial like this in recent memory. i would be hard—pressed to find something in the last 20 years that would even compare to this, the fact that the cameras have been in the boardroom and we've been getting these not only videos and audio recordings, text messages as well, intimate text messages that reveal the innermost thoughts and feelings of both depp and heard at various points in their marriage. it also goes to show, given how unflattering the betrayal has been of both defendants, itjust goes to show how seriouslyjohnny depp wanted to litigate this, given that he would've almost certainly known what would've come out in this trial, that everything that wasn't out already come out through

discovery. out already come out through discovery-— out already come out through discove . �* , . , h, discovery. it's an interesting point that we will _ discovery. it's an interesting point that we will lead _ discovery. it's an interesting point that we will lead onto _ discovery. it's an interesting point that we will lead onto now, - discovery. it's an interesting point l that we will lead onto now, because we are awaiting these verdicts, but effectively we can already make an assessment of the lasting impact of this trial, because we now know so many allegations about behaviour in this marriage. where do you think this marriage. where do you think this case leavesjohnny depp and amber heard? it this case leaves johnny depp and amber heard?— this case leaves johnny depp and amber heard? . _ ., , , , , amber heard? it leaves johnny depp in a stronger— amber heard? it leaves johnny depp in a stronger position _ amber heard? it leaves johnny depp in a stronger position in _ amber heard? it leaves johnny depp in a stronger position in terms - amber heard? it leaves johnny depp in a stronger position in terms of - in a stronger position in terms of public image and pr then he was in prior to this trial because, as one of your reporters mentioned, there has been a tremendous amount of support for him on social media. now we could parse why that is and look into the motive or who might be behind that, if anyone is at all behind that, if anyone is at all behind that, if anyone is at all behind that, but he has regained the level of public support, or at least had his supporters come out more

publicly than they had previously before this trial. so he, i think in the court of public opinion, is coming out ahead. as for amber heard, i do think she so far has come out worse for the wear, and that has to do with a combination of factors in terms of the case that her lawyers, her attorneys put forward, and alsojust her lawyers, her attorneys put forward, and also just how she's been treated on social media — and she herself addressed that in her rebuttal testimony that she gave just at the end of last week. the question will be, will either of them be able to have anything like them be able to have anything like the career they had before, or career at all, will they be able to work in tv or film, or sponsored promotions for products such as l'0real, which amber heard had a contract with prior to all this drama in the public eye. that is very much unknown and i do believe

that the result of this verdict will have a huge implication for that. fascinating stuff, thanks so much for talking us through that. we may well come back to speak to you once well come back to speak to you once we have a verdict. we are watching these aerial images live from virginia, emphasising really the centre of attention for so many people's lives and attention over the last six weeks— and that verdict about to be reached will be significant and reverberate around the globe, many column inches will be written about what these verdicts are. i think we can go back to our correspondent there who's been following the case. whilst we wait now for the verdicts, just before i ask you about the last six weeks, i just wanted to repeat what we heard

there from the judge. in the depp—heard defamation case, she sends thejury back depp—heard defamation case, she sends the jury back to add damage amounts on the verdict forms. so a bit of admin from the judge — when we came in, we were exciting it to be the big moment, but thejudge sent them back out to add specific amounts of dollar amounts on the verdict form, which suggests, according to our last guest there, that some decision has been reached or that there will be damages. but of course there is another option that $0 is added on and maybe we are barking up the wrong tree here. just wanted to repeat that line, butjust talk us through what it's been like from your position over the last six weeks. , ., from your position over the last six weeks. , . . , from your position over the last six weeks. , . .,, , from your position over the last six weeks. , . , ., weeks. this trial has 'ust - to say it's had weeks. this trial has 'ust - to say

us had much weeks. this trial hasjust - to say it's had public industry _ weeks. this trial hasjust - to say it's had public industry democrat| it's had public industry democrat interest is a huge understatement. outside the courthouse, there is a huge crowd forming. it was only a short while ago when we knew that it was coming today that was really quiet, everyone sprung into action, everyone has given 90 minutes to get themselves together, but there are nowjohnny depp fans arriving here — it's always been predominately johnny depp fans outside the courthouse. i spoke to one fan is 19 years old, she lives around here and said to me this was a once—in—a—lifetime opportunity to be here and seejohnny depp — but johnny depp isn't here, it appears that he is in newcastle in the uk, but amber heard is here inside the court, with her team waiting for that verdict. johnny depp's legal team is here. back to that 19—year—old, i asked team is here. back to that 19—year—old, iasked her what team is here. back to that 19—year—old, i asked her what was so fascinating about the case, and she said that she was a johnny depp fan, she enjoys his movies and she felt it was important to be here. and

that's kind of a lot of stuff the otherjohnny depp fans have been saying here. in terms of amber heard fans, honestly there's not been that many careful sub usually you can spot them because there's about three or four of them, and spot them because there's about three orfour of them, and it spot them because there's about three or four of them, and it tends to be one particular person that all the media talk to because it often seems to be the only person here. i think i can tell you a lot about which way this has been going publicly. you hear legal experts saying this is a tale of two trials, the one inside the courthouse and the one inside the courthouse and the one inside the courthouse and the one outside in the public domain. there are no crowds gathering and people have their mobile phones up, it's all being televised out of court so they are all waiting for that verdict. we've been chatting a _ all waiting for that verdict. we've been chatting a while _ all waiting for that verdict. we've been chatting a while now- all waiting for that verdict. we've been chatting a while now and i l been chatting a while now and i realise we haven't really explained who johnny realise we haven't really explained whojohnny depp and amber heard are. now that might seem obvious to lots of people, but of course there will be lots of people around the world who don't take a great deal of

interest in hollywood and celebrities. so let's start — who are these two actors? celebrities. so let's start - who are these two actors?— are these two actors? johnny depp and amber heard _ are these two actors? johnny depp and amber heard are _ are these two actors? johnny depp and amber heard are two - are these two actors? johnny depp and amber heard are two actors i are these two actors? johnny depp l and amber heard are two actors who met on the set of a movie and fell in love, they were engaged and married... i in love, they were engaged and married- - -_ in love, they were engaged and married... ., ., , married... i have to interrupt you straightaway _ married... i have to interrupt you straightaway because _ married... i have to interrupt you straightaway because the - married... i have to interrupt you straightaway because the judge l married... i have to interrupt you l straightaway because the judge has come back in and sat down, so we will listen in.

all right, mr foreperson, all right, mrforeperson, is this the verdict of the jury? yes all right, mr foreperson, is this the verdict of the jury? the verdict of the “my? yes ma'am. is a unanimous? — the verdict of the jury? yes ma'am. is a unanimous? yes _ the verdict of the jury? yes ma'am. is a unanimous? yes ma'am. - the verdict of the jury? yes ma'am. j is a unanimous? yes ma'am. thank ou. in is a unanimous? yes ma'am. thank you- in civil— is a unanimous? yes ma'am. thank you. in civil case _ is a unanimous? yes ma'am. thank you. in civil case cl— is a unanimous? yes ma'am. thank you. in civil case cl 2019 _ is a unanimous? yes ma'am. thank you. in civil case cl 2019 2911, - is a unanimous? yes ma'am. thank you. in civil case cl 2019 2911, mr. you. in civil case cl 2019 2911, mr de e's you. in civil case cl 2019 2911, mr deppe's claim _ you. in civil case cl 2019 2911, mr deppe's claim against _ you. in civil case cl 2019 2911, mr deppe's claim against miss - you. in civil case cl 2019 2911, mr deppe's claim against miss herd, | deppe's claim against miss herd, one, _ deppe's claim against miss herd, one. as _ deppe's claim against miss herd, one. as to— deppe's claim against miss herd, one. as to the _ deppe's claim against miss herd, one, as to the statement - deppe's claim against miss herd, i one, as to the statement appearing

in the _ one, as to the statement appearing in the online — one, as to the statement appearing in the online op—ed _ one, as to the statement appearing in the online op—ed entitled - one, as to the statement appearing| in the online op—ed entitled "amber heard: _ in the online op—ed entitled "amber heard: i_ in the online op—ed entitled "amber heard: i spoke— in the online op—ed entitled "amber heard: i spoke up— in the online op—ed entitled "amber heard: i spoke up against- in the online op—ed entitled "amber heard: i spoke up against sexual. heard: i spoke up against sexual violence — heard: i spoke up against sexual violence and _ heard: i spoke up against sexual violence and face _ heard: i spoke up against sexual violence and face our— heard: i spoke up against sexual violence and face our culture'sl violence and face our culture's wrath" — violence and face our culture's wrath" in — violence and face our culture's wrath" in the _ violence and face our culture's wrath" in the washington - violence and face our culture's wrath" in the washington postl violence and face our culture's- wrath" in the washington post online edition, _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke up _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke up against - wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke up against sexual. edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence _ edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and — edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and face _ edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and face our _ edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and face our culture's - violence and face our culture's wrath, _ violence and face our culture's wrath, that— violence and face our culture's wrath, that has— violence and face our culture's wrath, that has to _ violence and face our culture's wrath, that has to change." i violence and face our culture's| wrath, that has to change." do violence and face our culture's - wrath, that has to change." do you find that— wrath, that has to change." do you find that mr— wrath, that has to change." do you find that mr deppe _ wrath, that has to change." do you find that mr deppe has— wrath, that has to change." do you find that mr deppe has all- wrath, that has to change." do you find that mr deppe has all the - find that mr deppe has all the caucasians— find that mr deppe has all the caucasians of— find that mr deppe has all the - caucasians of defamation because like the _ caucasians of defamation because like the answer— caucasians of defamation because like the answer is _ caucasians of defamation because like the answer is yes. _ caucasians of defamation because like the answer is yes. the - like the answer is yes. the statement _ like the answer is yes. the statement was _ like the answer is yes. the statement was made - like the answer is yes. the statement was made or. like the answer is yes. the - statement was made or published by miss heard — statement was made or published by miss heard the _ statement was made or published by miss heard. the answer— statement was made or published by miss heard. the answer is— statement was made or published by miss heard. the answer is yes. - statement was made or published by miss heard. the answer is yes. the i miss heard. the answer is yes. the question. _ miss heard. the answer is yes. the question. the — miss heard. the answer is yes. the question, the statement— miss heard. the answer is yes. the question, the statement was - miss heard. the answer is yes. the question, the statement was aboutj miss heard. the answer is yes. the i question, the statement was about mr depp, _ question, the statement was about mr depp, the _ question, the statement was about mr depp. the answer— question, the statement was about mr depp. the answer is— question, the statement was about mr depp, the answer is yes. _ question, the statement was about mr depp, the answer is yes. question, i depp, the answer is yes. question, the statement _ depp, the answer is yes. question, the statement is _ depp, the answer is yes. question, the statement is false _ depp, the answer is yes. question, the statement is false — _ depp, the answer is yes. question, the statement is false — answer, i the statement is false — answer, yes _ the statement is false — answer, yes. question, _ the statement is false — answer, yes. question, the— the statement is false — answer, yes. question, the statement. the statement is false — answer, i yes. question, the statement has a defamatory— yes. question, the statement has a defamatory application _ yes. question, the statement has a defamatory application about - yes. question, the statement has a defamatory application about mr. defamatory application about mr deppe — defamatory application about mr deppe. answer. _ defamatory application about mr deppe. answer, yes. _ defamatory application about mr deppe. answer, yes. question, i

defamatory application about mr. deppe. answer, yes. question, the defamatory— deppe. answer, yes. question, the defamatory implication _ deppe. answer, yes. question, the defamatory implication was - deppe. answer, yes. question, the. defamatory implication was designed and intended — defamatory implication was designed and intended lry— defamatory implication was designed and intended by miss— defamatory implication was designed and intended by miss heard. - defamatory implication was designed| and intended by miss heard. answer, yes. and intended by miss heard. answer, yes~ question, — and intended by miss heard. answer, yes. question, due _ and intended by miss heard. answer, yes. question, due to— and intended by miss heard. answer, yes. question, due to circumstancesl yes. question, due to circumstances surrounding — yes. question, due to circumstances surrounding the _ yes. question, due to circumstances surrounding the publication - yes. question, due to circumstances surrounding the publication of - yes. question, due to circumstances surrounding the publication of this i surrounding the publication of this statement, — surrounding the publication of this statement, it— surrounding the publication of this statement, it conveyed _ surrounding the publication of this statement, it conveyed a - surrounding the publication of this i statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication _ statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to — statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone _ statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who - statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who sought i implication to someone who sought other— implication to someone who sought other than— implication to someone who sought other than mr— implication to someone who sought other than mr depp. _ implication to someone who sought other than mr depp. the _ implication to someone who sought other than mr depp. the answer, i implication to someone who sought. other than mr depp. the answer, yes. do you _ other than mr depp. the answer, yes. do you find _ other than mr depp. the answer, yes. do you find that mr— other than mr depp. the answer, yes. do you find that mr deppe _ other than mr depp. the answer, yes. do you find that mr deppe has - do you find that mr deppe has proven by clear— do you find that mr deppe has proven by clear and _ do you find that mr deppe has proven by clear and convincing _ do you find that mr deppe has proven by clear and convincing evidence - by clear and convincing evidence that miss — by clear and convincing evidence that miss heard _ by clear and convincing evidence that miss heard acted _ by clear and convincing evidence that miss heard acted with - by clear and convincing evidence i that miss heard acted with actual malice? — that miss heard acted with actual malice? answer, _ that miss heard acted with actual malice? answer, yes. _ that miss heard acted with actual malice? answer, yes. two, - that miss heard acted with actual malice? answer, yes. two, as i that miss heard acted with actual malice? answer, yes. two, as to| that miss heard acted with actual- malice? answer, yes. two, as to the statement _ malice? answer, yes. two, as to the statement appearing _ malice? answer, yes. two, as to the statement appearing in _ malice? answer, yes. two, as to the statement appearing in the - malice? answer, yes. two, as to the statement appearing in the op—ed i statement appearing in the op—ed entitled _ statement appearing in the op—ed entitled "a — statement appearing in the op—ed entitled "a transformative - statement appearing in the op—edl entitled "a transformative moment for women — entitled "a transformative moment for women in — entitled "a transformative moment for women in the _ entitled "a transformative moment for women in the washington - entitled "a transformative momentj for women in the washington post" print edition — for women in the washington post" print edition and _ for women in the washington post" print edition and online _ for women in the washington post" print edition and online op—ed - print edition and online op—ed "amber— print edition and online op—ed "amber heard: _ print edition and online op—ed "amber heard: i— print edition and online op—ed "amber heard: i spoke - print edition and online op—ed "amber heard: i spoke out. print edition and online op—ed - "amber heard: i spoke out against sexual— "amber heard: i spoke out against sexual violence _ "amber heard: i spoke out against sexual violence and _ "amber heard: i spoke out against sexual violence and face _ "amber heard: i spoke out against sexual violence and face our- sexual violence and face our culture's _ sexual violence and face our culture's wrath, _ sexual violence and face our culture's wrath, that - sexual violence and face our culture's wrath, that has - sexual violence and face our culture's wrath, that has tol sexual violence and face our- culture's wrath, that has to change" in the _ culture's wrath, that has to change" in the washington _ culture's wrath, that has to change" in the washington post _ culture's wrath, that has to change" in the washington post online - in the washington post online edition — in the washington post online edition " _ in the washington post online edition " two— in the washington post online edition. " two years _ in the washington post online edition. " two years ago, - in the washington post online edition. " two years ago, i- in the washington post online -

edition. " two years ago, i became a public— edition. " two years ago, i became a public figure — edition. " two years ago, i became a public figure representing _ edition. " two years ago, i became a public figure representing domesticl public figure representing domestic abuse _ public figure representing domestic abuse and — public figure representing domestic abuse and i— public figure representing domestic abuse and i felt _ public figure representing domestic abuse and i felt the _ public figure representing domestic abuse and i felt the full— public figure representing domestic abuse and i felt the full force - public figure representing domestic abuse and i felt the full force of. abuse and i felt the full force of our culture's _ abuse and i felt the full force of our culture's clap _ abuse and i felt the full force of our culture's clap for— abuse and i felt the full force of our culture's clap for women i abuse and i felt the full force of. our culture's clap for women who speak— our culture's clap for women who speak out" — our culture's clap for women who speak out" do _ our culture's clap for women who speak out." do you _ our culture's clap for women who speak out." do you find - our culture's clap for women who speak out." do you find that - our culture's clap for women who speak out." do you find that mr. our culture's clap for women who - speak out." do you find that mr depp has proven— speak out." do you find that mr depp has proven all— speak out." do you find that mr depp has proven all the _ speak out." do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements - has proven all the elements of defamation? _ has proven all the elements of defamation? answer, - has proven all the elements of defamation? answer, yes. - has proven all the elements of| defamation? answer, yes. has has proven all the elements of. defamation? answer, yes. has mr has proven all the elements of - defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a _ defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a greater— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a greater weight _ defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a greater weight of— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a greater weight of the - proven by a greater weight of the evidence — proven by a greater weight of the evidence that _ proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question, - proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question, the - evidence that question, the statement _ evidence that question, the statement was _ evidence that question, the statement was made - evidence that question, the statement was made or- evidence that question, the - statement was made or published by miss herd? _ statement was made or published by miss herd? the— statement was made or published by miss herd? the answer, _ statement was made or published by miss herd? the answer, yes. - statement was made or published byl miss herd? the answer, yes. boston, the statement — miss herd? the answer, yes. boston, the statement was _ miss herd? the answer, yes. boston, the statement was about _ miss herd? the answer, yes. boston, the statement was about mr - miss herd? the answer, yes. boston, the statement was about mr depp. i the statement was about mr depp. answer. _ the statement was about mr depp. answer. yes~ — the statement was about mr depp. answer, yes. question, _ the statement was about mr depp. answer, yes. question, the - the statement was about mr depp. - answer, yes. question, the statement was false _ answer, yes. question, the statement was false. answer, _ answer, yes. question, the statement was false. answer, yes. _ answer, yes. question, the statement was false. answer, yes. question: - was false. answer, yes. question: the statement _ was false. answer, yes. question: the statement has _ was false. answer, yes. question: the statement has a _ was false. answer, yes. question: the statement has a defamatory. the statement has a defamatory implement— the statement has a defamatory implement democrat _ the statement has a defamatoryl implement democrat implication the statement has a defamatory- implement democrat implication about mr depp _ implement democrat implication about mr depp. answer. _ implement democrat implication about mr depp. answer. yes~ _ implement democrat implication about mr depp. answer, yes. question: - implement democrat implication about mr depp. answer, yes. question: the i mr depp. answer, yes. question: the defamatory— mr depp. answer, yes. question: the defamatory implication _ mr depp. answer, yes. question: the defamatory implication was _ mr depp. answer, yes. question: the defamatory implication was designed| defamatory implication was designed and intended — defamatory implication was designed and intended by— defamatory implication was designed and intended by miss— defamatory implication was designed and intended by miss herd. - defamatory implication was designed and intended by miss herd. answer, i and intended by miss herd. answer, yes. question: — and intended by miss herd. answer, yes. question: due— and intended by miss herd. answer, yes. question: due to _ and intended by miss herd. answer, | yes. question: due to circumstances surrounding — yes. question: due to circumstances surrounding the _ yes. question: due to circumstances surrounding the publication - yes. question: due to circumstances surrounding the publication of - yes. question: due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the i surrounding the publication of the statement, — surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed _ surrounding the publication of the i statement, it conveyed a defamatory implement _ statement, it conveyed a defamatory implement democrat _

statement, it conveyed a defamatory implement democrat implication - statement, it conveyed a defamatory implement democrat implication to i implement democrat implication to someone _ implement democrat implication to someone who— implement democrat implication to someone who sought _ implement democrat implication to someone who sought other- implement democrat implication to someone who sought other than i implement democrat implication to| someone who sought other than mr depp _ someone who sought other than mr depp. answer: _ someone who sought other than mr depp: answer: yes: _ someone who sought other than mr depp. answer: yes. do— someone who sought other than mr depp. answer: yes. do you - someone who sought other than mr depp. answer: yes. do you find - someone who sought other than mr| depp. answer: yes. do you find that mr depp— depp. answer: yes. do you find that mr depp has— depp. answer: yes. do you find that mr depp has proven _ depp. answer: yes. do you find that mr depp has proven by— depp. answer: yes. do you find that mr depp has proven by clear- depp. answer: yes. do you find that mr depp has proven by clear and - mr depp has proven by clear and convincing — mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence _ mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that - mr depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that miss i mr depp has proven by clear and - convincing evidence that miss heard acted _ convincing evidence that miss heard acted with— convincing evidence that miss heard acted with actual— convincing evidence that miss heard acted with actual malice? _ convincing evidence that miss heard acted with actual malice? answer: l acted with actual malice? answer: yes. acted with actual malice? answer: yes: three — acted with actual malice? answer: yes: three - — acted with actual malice? answer: yes: three - as— acted with actual malice? answer: yes: three - as to _ acted with actual malice? answer: yes. three — as to the _ acted with actual malice? answer: yes. three — as to the statement i yes. three — as to the statement appearing — yes. three — as to the statement appearing in— yes. three — as to the statement appearing in the _ yes. three — as to the statement appearing in the op—ed _ yes. three — as to the statement appearing in the op—ed entitled"| yes. three — as to the statement. appearing in the op—ed entitled" a transformative _ appearing in the op—ed entitled" a transformative moment— appearing in the op—ed entitled" a transformative moment for - appearing in the op—ed entitled" a. transformative moment for women" appearing in the op—ed entitled" a- transformative moment for women" in the washington — transformative moment for women" in the washington post _ transformative moment for women" in the washington post print— the washington post print edition and the _ the washington post print edition and the online _ the washington post print edition and the online op—ed" _ the washington post print edition and the online op—ed" amber- the washington post print edition. and the online op—ed" amber heard: the washington post print edition- and the online op—ed" amber heard: i spoke _ and the online op—ed" amber heard: i spoke 0ut _ and the online op—ed" amber heard: i spoke out against— and the online op—ed" amber heard: i spoke out against sexual _ and the online op—ed" amber heard: i spoke out against sexual violence . spoke out against sexual violence and face _ spoke out against sexual violence and face are — spoke out against sexual violence and face are culture's— spoke out against sexual violence and face are culture's wrath, - spoke out against sexual violence j and face are culture's wrath, that has to _ and face are culture's wrath, that has to change" _ and face are culture's wrath, that has to change" in _ and face are culture's wrath, that has to change" in the _ and face are culture's wrath, that has to change" in the washingtonl has to change" in the washington post online — has to change" in the washington post online edition. _ has to change" in the washington post online edition. "i _ has to change" in the washington post online edition. "i had - has to change" in the washington post online edition. "i had the - has to change" in the washington| post online edition. "i had the rare vantage _ post online edition. "i had the rare vantage point _ post online edition. "i had the rare vantage point in _ post online edition. "i had the rare vantage point in seeing _ post online edition. "i had the rare vantage point in seeing in - post online edition. "i had the rare vantage point in seeing in real- post online edition. "i had the rarel vantage point in seeing in real time how institutions _ vantage point in seeing in real time how institutions protect _ vantage point in seeing in real time how institutions protect men- vantage point in seeing in real time i how institutions protect men accused of abuse" _ how institutions protect men accused ofabuse" do— how institutions protect men accused of abuse" do you _ how institutions protect men accused of abuse." do you find _ how institutions protect men accused of abuse." do you find that _ how institutions protect men accused of abuse." do you find that mr- how institutions protect men accused of abuse." do you find that mr deppl of abuse." do you find that mr depp has proven— of abuse." do you find that mr depp has proven all— of abuse." do you find that mr depp has proven all the _ of abuse." do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements - of abuse." do you find that mr depp has proven all the elements of - has proven all the elements of defamation? _ has proven all the elements of defamation? answer, - has proven all the elements of defamation? answer, yes. - has proven all the elements of| defamation? answer, yes. has has proven all the elements of. defamation? answer, yes. has mr has proven all the elements of - defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a _ defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp

proven by a greater— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a greater weight _ defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a greater weight of— defamation? answer, yes. has mr depp proven by a greater weight of the - proven by a greater weight of the evidence — proven by a greater weight of the evidence that _ proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question, - proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question, the - evidence that question, the statement was _ evidence that question, the statement was made - evidence that question, the statement was made or- evidence that question, the - statement was made or published by miss heard? — statement was made or published by miss heard? answer: _ statement was made or published by miss heard? answer: yes. _ statement was made or published by miss heard? answer: yes. question: the statement — miss heard? answer: yes. question: the statement was _ miss heard? answer: yes. question: the statement was about _ miss heard? answer: yes. question: the statement was about mr - miss heard? answer: yes. question: the statement was about mr depp. l the statement was about mr depp. answer: _ the statement was about mr depp. answer: yes: — the statement was about mr depp. answer: yes. question: _ the statement was about mr depp. answer: yes. question: the - the statement was about mr depp. - answer: yes. question: the statement was false: _ answer: yes. question: the statement was false: " _ answer: yes. question: the defamatory— answer: yes. question: the defamatory implement - answer: yes. question: the - defamatory implement democrat implication — defamatory implement democrat implication was _ defamatory implement democrat implication was designed - defamatory implement democrat implication was designed and - implication was designed and intended _ implication was designed and intended by— implication was designed and intended by miss _ implication was designed and intended by miss heard. - implication was designed and - intended by miss heard. answer: yes. question: _ intended by miss heard. answer: yes. question: due— intended by miss heard. answer: yes. question: due to _ intended by miss heard. answer: yes. question: due to circumstances - question: due to circumstances surrounding _ question: due to circumstances surrounding the _ question: due to circumstances surrounding the publication - question: due to circumstances surrounding the publication of i question: due to circumstances . surrounding the publication of this statement: — surrounding the publication of this statement: it— surrounding the publication of this statement, it conveyed _ surrounding the publication of this statement, it conveyed a - surrounding the publication of this i statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication _ statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to — statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone _ statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who - statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who sought i implication to someone who sought other— implication to someone who sought other than— implication to someone who sought other than mr— implication to someone who sought other than mr depp. _ implication to someone who sought other than mr depp. answer: - implication to someone who sought other than mr depp. answer: yes. i other than mr depp. answer: yes. question: — other than mr depp. answer: yes. question: do— other than mr depp. answer: yes. question: do you _ other than mr depp. answer: yes. question: do you found _ other than mr depp. answer: yes. question: do you found that - other than mr depp. answer: yes. question: do you found that mr. other than mr depp. answer: yes. i question: do you found that mr depp is found _ question: do you found that mr depp is found through _ question: do you found that mr depp is found through clear— question: do you found that mr depp is found through clear and _ is found through clear and convincing _ is found through clear and convincing evidence - is found through clear and convincing evidence that i is found through clear and - convincing evidence that miss heard acted _ convincing evidence that miss heard acted with— convincing evidence that miss heard acted with actual— convincing evidence that miss heard acted with actual malice? _ convincing evidence that miss heard acted with actual malice? answer: l acted with actual malice? answer: yes.

acted with actual malice? answer: yes: as _ acted with actual malice? answer: yes: as against _ acted with actual malice? answer: yes. as against amber— acted with actual malice? answer: yes. as against amber heard, - acted with actual malice? answer: yes. as against amber heard, wel acted with actual malice? answer: i yes. as against amber heard, we the 'ury yes. as against amber heard, we the jury awarded — yes. as against amber heard, we the jury awarded compensatory _ yes. as against amber heard, we the jury awarded compensatory damages | yes. as against amber heard, we the . jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount— jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount of— jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $10 _ jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $10 million. _ jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $10 million. as- the amount of $10 million. as against — the amount of $10 million. as against amber— the amount of $10 million. as against amber heard, - the amount of $10 million. as against amber heard, we - the amount of $10 million. as against amber heard, we the| the amount of $10 million. as- against amber heard, we the jury award _ against amber heard, we the jury award punitive _ against amber heard, we the jury award punitive damages- against amber heard, we the jury award punitive damages in- against amber heard, we the jury award punitive damages in the . against amber heard, we the jury- award punitive damages in the amount of $5 million: — award punitive damages in the amount of $5 million: in— award punitive damages in the amount of $5 million. in civil— award punitive damages in the amount of $5 million. in civil case _ award punitive damages in the amount of $5 million. in civil case number- of $5 million. in civil case number cl of $5 million. in civil case number cl 2019 _ of $5 million. in civil case number cl 2019 2911. _ of $5 million. in civil case number cl 2019 2911, miss _ of $5 million. in civil case number cl 2019 2911, miss heard's - of $5 million. in civil case number cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim i cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim against — cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim against mr— cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim against mr depp: _ cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim against mr depp. one _ cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim against mr depp. one — - cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim against mr depp. one — as- cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claim against mr depp. one — as to i cl 2019 2911, miss heard's claimi against mr depp. one — as to the statement — against mr depp. one — as to the statement appearing _ against mr depp. one — as to the statement appearing in _ against mr depp. one — as to the statement appearing in the - against mr depp. one — as to the statement appearing in the aprill statement appearing in the april eight. _ statement appearing in the april eight. 2020 _ statement appearing in the april eight, 2020 online _ statement appearing in the april eight, 2020 online edition- statement appearing in the april eight, 2020 online edition of. statement appearing in the april| eight, 2020 online edition of the daily— eight, 2020 online edition of the daily mail. — eight, 2020 online edition of the daily mail, "amber— eight, 2020 online edition of the daily mail, "amber heard - eight, 2020 online edition of the daily mail, "amber heard and i eight, 2020 online edition of the| daily mail, "amber heard and her friends _ daily mail, "amber heard and her friends in — daily mail, "amber heard and her friends in the _ daily mail, "amber heard and her friends in the media _ daily mail, "amber heard and her friends in the media used - daily mail, "amber heard and her friends in the media used fake - friends in the media used fake sexual— friends in the media used fake sexual violence _ friends in the media used fake sexual violence allegations - friends in the media used fake sexual violence allegations as | friends in the media used fake - sexual violence allegations as both a sword _ sexual violence allegations as both a sword and — sexual violence allegations as both a sword and shield _ sexual violence allegations as both a sword and shield depending - sexual violence allegations as both a sword and shield depending on i a sword and shield depending on their— a sword and shield depending on their needs: _ a sword and shield depending on their needs. they— a sword and shield depending on their needs. they have _ a sword and shield depending on their needs. they have selected i a sword and shield depending on - their needs. they have selected some of her— their needs. they have selected some of her sexual— their needs. they have selected some of her sexual violence _ their needs. they have selected some of her sexual violence hooks, - their needs. they have selected some of her sexual violence hooks, facts . of her sexual violence hooks, facts as the _ of her sexual violence hooks, facts as the sword _ of her sexual violence hooks, facts as the sword, and _ of her sexual violence hooks, facts as the sword, and flicking - of her sexual violence hooks, facts as the sword, and flicking them i of her sexual violence hooks, facts as the sword, and flicking them on the public— as the sword, and flicking them on the public and _ as the sword, and flicking them on the public and mr— as the sword, and flicking them on the public and mr depp." - as the sword, and flicking them on the public and mr depp." do - as the sword, and flicking them on the public and mr depp." do you i the public and mr depp." do you found _ the public and mr depp." do you found that — the public and mr depp." do you found that miss _ the public and mr depp." do you found that miss heard _ the public and mr depp." do you found that miss heard has - the public and mr depp." do youl found that miss heard has proven the public and mr depp." do you - found that miss heard has proven all the elements— found that miss heard has proven all the elements of— found that miss heard has proven all the elements of defamation? -

found that miss heard has proven all. the elements of defamation? answer: no. the elements of defamation? answer: no: two— the elements of defamation? answer: no: two - _ the elements of defamation? answer: no: two - as— the elements of defamation? answer: no: two - as to — the elements of defamation? answer: no. two — as to this _ the elements of defamation? answer: no. two — as to this statement- no. two — as to this statement appearing _ no. two — as to this statement appearing in— no. two — as to this statement appearing in the _ no. two — as to this statement appearing in the 27— no. two — as to this statement appearing in the 27 april, - no. two — as to this statementl appearing in the 27 april, 2020 online — appearing in the 27 april, 2020 online edition of— appearing in the 27 april, 2020 online edition of the daily- appearing in the 27 april, 2020 l online edition of the daily mail... we have — online edition of the daily mail... we have to — online edition of the daily mail... we have to say— online edition of the daily mail... we have to say goodbye - online edition of the daily mail... we have to say goodbye to - online edition of the daily mail... we have to say goodbye to our i online edition of the daily mail... - we have to say goodbye to our people the micro pbs viewers. thea;r we have to say goodbye to our people the micro pbs viewers.— the micro pbs viewers. they set mr de - the micro pbs viewers. they set mr de-- u- the micro pbs viewers. they set mr depp up by — the micro pbs viewers. they set mr depp up by calling _ the micro pbs viewers. they set mr depp up by calling the _ the micro pbs viewers. they set mr depp up by calling the cops - the micro pbs viewers. they set mr depp up by calling the cops but - the micro pbs viewers. they set mr depp up by calling the cops but the | depp up by calling the cops but the first attempted _ depp up by calling the cops but the first attempted not _ depp up by calling the cops but the first attempted not do _ depp up by calling the cops but the first attempted not do the - depp up by calling the cops but the first attempted not do the trick. . first attempted not do the trick. the officers _ first attempted not do the trick. the officers came _ first attempted not do the trick. the officers came to _ first attempted not do the trick. the officers came to the - first attempted not do the trick. - the officers came to the penthouses, thoroughly— the officers came to the penthouses, thoroughly searched _ the officers came to the penthouses, thoroughly searched and _ the officers came to the penthouses,| thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left _ thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after — thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after seeing _ thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after seeing no _ thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after seeing no damage - thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after seeing no damage to i and left after seeing no damage to face her— and left after seeing no damage to face her property: _ and left after seeing no damage to face her property. so _ and left after seeing no damage to face her property. so amber- and left after seeing no damage to face her property. so amber and l and left after seeing no damage to i face her property. so amber and her friends _ face her property. so amber and her friends spilt — face her property. so amber and her friends spilt a — face her property. so amber and her friends spilt a little _ face her property. so amber and her friends spilt a little wine _ face her property. so amber and her friends spilt a little wine and - friends spilt a little wine and rough — friends spilt a little wine and rough to— friends spilt a little wine and rough to the _ friends spilt a little wine and rough to the place _ friends spilt a little wine and rough to the place up, - friends spilt a little wine and rough to the place up, got i friends spilt a little wine and i rough to the place up, got their stories— rough to the place up, got their stories straight— rough to the place up, got their stories straight under— rough to the place up, got their stories straight under the - rough to the place up, got their. stories straight under the direction of a lawyer— stories straight under the direction of a lawyer and _ stories straight under the direction of a lawyer and publicist, - stories straight under the direction of a lawyer and publicist, then - of a lawyer and publicist, then placed — of a lawyer and publicist, then placed a — of a lawyer and publicist, then placed a second _ of a lawyer and publicist, then placed a second call— of a lawyer and publicist, then placed a second call 911." - of a lawyer and publicist, then placed a second call 911." do. of a lawyer and publicist, then i placed a second call 911." do you find that — placed a second call 911." do you find that miss — placed a second call 911." do you find that miss heard _ placed a second call 911." do you find that miss heard has- placed a second call 911." do you find that miss heard has provenl find that miss heard has proven all the elements— find that miss heard has proven all the elements of— find that miss heard has proven all the elements of defamation? - find that miss heard has proven all. the elements of defamation? answer: it yes: _ the elements of defamation? answer: it yes: has _ the elements of defamation? answer: it yes. has miss heard _ the elements of defamation? answer: it yes. has miss heard proven by- the elements of defamation? answer: it yes. has miss heard proven by a - it yes. has miss heard proven by a greater— it yes. has miss heard proven by a greater weight _ it yes. has miss heard proven by a greater weight of— it yes. has miss heard proven by a greater weight of the _ it yes. has miss heard proven by a greater weight of the evidence - it yes. has miss heard proven by a| greater weight of the evidence that question— greater weight of the evidence that question mr— greater weight of the evidence that question mr waldman, _ greater weight of the evidence that question mr waldman, while - greater weight of the evidence thatj

question mr waldman, while acting greater weight of the evidence that i question mr waldman, while acting as an agent _ question mr waldman, while acting as an agent for— question mr waldman, while acting as an agent for mr— question mr waldman, while acting as an agent for mr depp, _ question mr waldman, while acting as an agent for mr depp, may _ question mr waldman, while acting as an agent for mr depp, may have - an agent for mr depp, may have published — an agent for mr depp, may have published the _ an agent for mr depp, may have published the statement? - an agent for mr depp, may have . published the statement? answer: yes. published the statement? answer: yes: question: _ published the statement? answer: yes. question: the _ published the statement? answer: yes. question: the statement - published the statement? answer: yes. question: the statement wasl yes. question: the statement was about— yes. question: the statement was about miss— yes. question: the statement was about miss heard. _ yes. question: the statement was about miss heard. answer: - yes. question: the statement was about miss heard. answer: yes. l about miss heard. answer: yes. question: — about miss heard. answer: yes. question: the _ about miss heard. answer: yes. question: the statement - about miss heard. answer: yes. question: the statement was i about miss heard. answer: yes. . question: the statement was seen about miss heard. answer: yes. - question: the statement was seen by someone _ question: the statement was seen by someone other— question: the statement was seen by someone other bite _ question: the statement was seen by someone other bite democrat- question: the statement was seen by someone other bite democrat then i someone other bite democrat then misheard — someone other bite democrat then misheard. answer: _ someone other bite democrat then misheard. answer: yes. _ someone other bite democrat then misheard. answer: yes. question: | misheard. answer: yes. question: this statement— misheard. answer: yes. question: this statement was _ misheard. answer: yes. question: this statement was false. - misheard. answer: yes. question: this statement was false. answer: i this statement was false. answer: yes. question: _ this statement was false. answer: yes. question: do— this statement was false. answer: yes. question: do you _ this statement was false. answer: yes. question: do you find - this statement was false. answer: yes. question: do you find that. this statement was false. answer: . yes. question: do you find that miss heard _ yes. question: do you find that miss heard has _ yes. question: do you find that miss heard has found _ yes. question: do you find that miss heard has found that _ yes. question: do you find that miss heard has found that the _ yes. question: do you find that miss heard has found that the statement| heard has found that the statement was made _ heard has found that the statement was made with_ heard has found that the statement was made with actual _ heard has found that the statement was made with actual malice - heard has found that the statement was made with actual malice was i was made with actual malice was meant _ was made with actual malice was meant answer: _ was made with actual malice was meant answer: yes. _ was made with actual malice was meant answer: yes. three - was made with actual malice was meant answer: yes. three — - was made with actual malice was meant answer: yes. three — as l was made with actual malice was| meant answer: yes. three — as to was made with actual malice was - meant answer: yes. three — as to the statement _ meant answer: yes. three — as to the statement appearing _ meant answer: yes. three — as to the statement appearing in _ meant answer: yes. three — as to the statement appearing in the _ meant answer: yes. three — as to the statement appearing in the 27 - meant answer: yes. three — as to the statement appearing in the 27 april . statement appearing in the 27 april 2020 _ statement appearing in the 27 april 2020 online — statement appearing in the 27 april 2020 online edition— statement appearing in the 27 april 2020 online edition of— statement appearing in the 27 april 2020 online edition of the - statement appearing in the 27 april 2020 online edition of the daily- 2020 online edition of the daily mail. _ 2020 online edition of the daily mail. "we've— 2020 online edition of the daily mail, "we've reached _ 2020 online edition of the daily mail, "we've reached the - 2020 online edition of the daily- mail, "we've reached the beginning of the _ mail, "we've reached the beginning of the end _ mail, "we've reached the beginning of the end of— mail, "we've reached the beginning of the end of misheard's _ mail, "we've reached the beginning of the end of misheard's abuse - mail, "we've reached the beginning| of the end of misheard's abuse hoax against _ of the end of misheard's abuse hoax againstjohnny— of the end of misheard's abuse hoax against johnny depp." _ of the end of misheard's abuse hoax againstjohnny depp." do _ of the end of misheard's abuse hoax against johnny depp." do you - of the end of misheard's abuse hoax against johnny depp." do you find i against johnny depp." do you find that miss— against johnny depp." do you find that miss heard _ against johnny depp." do you find that miss heard has— against johnny depp." do you find that miss heard has proven - against johnny depp." do you find that miss heard has proven all- againstjohnny depp." do you find| that miss heard has proven all the elements— that miss heard has proven all the elements of— that miss heard has proven all the elements of defamation? - that miss heard has proven all the elements of defamation? answer: i that miss heard has proven all the - elements of defamation? answer: no. as against _ elements of defamation? answer: no. as againstjohn— elements of defamation? answer: no. as against john c_ elements of defamation? answer: no. as against john c depp _ elements of defamation? answer: no. as against john c depp the _

elements of defamation? answer: no. as againstjohn c depp the second, i as against john c depp the second, we the _ as against john c depp the second, we the jury— as against john c depp the second, we the jury awarded _ as against john c depp the second, we the jury awarded compensatory| we the jury awarded compensatory damages _ we the jury awarded compensatory damages in the _ we the jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount _ we the jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount of- we the jury awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $2 - we the jury awarded compensatory i damages in the amount of $2 million, as against— damages in the amount of $2 million, as againstjohn — damages in the amount of $2 million, as againstjohn c— damages in the amount of $2 million, as against john c depp _ damages in the amount of $2 million, as against john c depp the _ damages in the amount of $2 million, as againstjohn c depp the second, i as against john c depp the second, we the _ as against john c depp the second, we the jury— as against john c depp the second, we the jury award _ as against john c depp the second, we the jury award punitive - as againstjohn c depp the second, i we the jury award punitive damages in the _ we the jury award punitive damages in the amount— we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of— we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of $0. _ we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of $0. does - we the jury award punitive damages in the amount of $0.— in the amount of $0. does either side wish to _ in the amount of $0. does either side wish to have _ in the amount of $0. does either side wish to have the _ in the amount of $0. does either side wish to have the jury - in the amount of $0. does either| side wish to have the jury pulled? yes, your honour. side wish to have the 'ury pulled? yes, your honour.— side wish to have the 'ury pulled? yes, your honour. members of the 'u . yes, your honour. members of the 'u , if yes, your honour. members of the jury. if this — yes, your honour. members of the jury. if this is _ yes, your honour. members of the jury, if this is your _ yes, your honour. members of the jury, if this is your verdict, - jury, if this is your verdict, please _ jury, if this is your verdict, please answer— jury, if this is your verdict, please answer yes. - jury, if this is your verdict, please answer yes. if- jury, if this is your verdict, please answer yes. if this i jury, if this is your verdict, i please answer yes. if this is not your— please answer yes. if this is not your verdict. _ please answer yes. if this is not your verdict, please _ please answer yes. if this is not your verdict, please answer- please answer yes. if this is not your verdict, please answer no. j your verdict, please answer no. juror— your verdict, please answer no. juror number— your verdict, please answer no. juror number six. _ your verdict, please answer no. juror number six.— your verdict, please answer no. juror number six. yes. juror- your verdict, please answer no. - juror number six. yes. juror number ten. yes. juror number six. yes. juror number ten- yes- juror— juror number six. yes. juror number ten. yes. juror number _ juror number six. yes. juror number ten. yes. juror number15. _ juror number six. yes. juror number ten. yes. juror number15. yes. - ten. yes. juror number15. yes. juror number — ten. yes. juror number15. yes. juror number 16. _ ten. yes. juror number15. yes. juror number 16. yes. - ten. yes. juror number15. yes. juror number16. yes. juror- ten. yes. juror number15. yes. - juror number 16. yes. juror number 22. yes. juror number 16. yes. juror number 22- yes- juror— juror number 16. yes. juror number 22. yes. juror number _ juror number 16. yes. juror number 22. yes. juror number 27. - juror number 16. yes. juror number 22. yes. juror number 27. yes. - juror number 16. yes. juror number| 22. yes. juror number 27. yes. juror number29- _ 22. yes. juror number 27. yes. juror number 29. yes. _ 22. yes. juror number 27. yes. juror number 29. yes. do _ 22. yes. juror number 27. yes. juror number 29. yes. do you _ 22. yes. juror number 27. yes. juror number 29. yes. do you the - 22. yes. juror number 27. yes. juror number 29. yes. do you the jury's i number 29. yes. do you the 'ury's verdict is unanimous. * number 29.“ do you the jury's verdict is unanimous. this- number 29.“ do you the jury's . verdict is unanimous. this concludes your service in this case, i want to thank you again for your dedication and hard work during this trial, i know i speak for everybody here when

i tell you we appreciate your sacrifices and your time in the public service. i'll have you go back to thejury public service. i'll have you go back to the jury deliberation room for one more time and we will release you from there. thank you. there we have the verdict, johnny depp has one his multi—million dollar us lawsuit against his former wife, amber heard. thejury there ruled that her article in the washington post in 2018 was defamatory and they've awarded damages tojohnny depp. you can see them shaking hands there, that is johnny depp's legal team there closest to the camera. flan johnny depp's legal team there closest to the camera.- johnny depp's legal team there closest to the camera. can we do it on 24june — closest to the camera. can we do it on 24june at _ closest to the camera. can we do it on 24 june at 10am _ closest to the camera. can we do it on 24 june at 10am if that's - on 24june at 10am if that's available? if you could prepare that order and circulate it, we can have all the objections noted on it. if i

get it before that date i'll take it off the docket. thank you to all the attorneys for your professionalism and you're welcome to come to my courtroom anytime— in a few weeks, but after that, any time. court is adjourned, thank you. hi but after that, any time. court is adjourned, thank you.— asi as i was saying there, be hugs there isjohnny depp us legal team on the right—hand side, johnny depp not they are in court, on the left—hand side is amber heard with the blonde hair hugging her legal team. side is amber heard with the blonde hair hugging her legalteam. she hair hugging her legal team. she has lost. she has been found to have defamed johnny depp in that article in the washington post. it was a long list that the judge read in the washington post. it was a long list that thejudge read out in the washington post. it was a long list that the judge read out of all the various different counts and

provisions that the jury reached their verdict on. the headline is thatjohnny depp has one this defamation trial against his ex—wife amber heard. you are watching bbc news. you're watching bbc news from london. forviewers news. you're watching bbc news from london. for viewers in the uk around the world you are seeing scenes from the world you are seeing scenes from the court in virginia in the united states. fairfax where amber heard has lost her legal case involving johnny depp and johnny depp has successfully sued her for defamation. thejury found in successfully sued her for defamation. the jury found in a succession of verdicts delivered in the last few minutes before the court after a six—week trial that amber had won had d defamed her former husband in an article first published in the washington post. in which she had described herself as a

victim of sexual violence. thejury found thatjohnny depp had proved all grounds required to establish the basis of defamation, including that the statement was false and that the statement was false and that amber, his former wife amber heard the actor had acted with malice. that is the court case. we will have in order delivered by the judge on the 24th ofjune on that morning when we will return to fairfax virginia. let's go outside the let's go court there. joining us now from outside the court in fairfax virginia, is our north america correspondent, nomia iqbal. this was in absolutely unambiguous verdict by the jury. it this was in absolutely unambiguous verdict by the jury-— verdict by the 'ury. it really was. this verdict by the 'ury. it really was. this was. — verdict by the 'ury. it really was. this was. in — verdict by the jury. it really was. this was, in terms _ verdict by the jury. it really was. this was, in terms of— verdict by the jury. it really was. this was, in terms of what they | verdict by the jury. it really was. i this was, in terms of what they had decided, they have made a judgment on amber heard's account of life with her ex—husband and on her

accounts of the abuse that she said she suffered at the hands of him. when that verdict was being read out, heroes are the court there is crowds foreman, there is always been ground here for the six—week trial, they mainly been depp supporters. it's very rare to find amber heard supporters here. when the verdict was read people started yelling and yelling and screaming and johnny, johnny, johnny. he's not here, he's in the uk at the moment. amber heard was inside as we saw being televised from court, she had her head bowed down as those verdicts were being delivered. as i say, this is a rejection of her account of things. it's really important to emphasise that what the jury found him at the jury that what the jury found him at the jury of five men and two women is that she acted with malice. basically what that means is that she wrote the article in the washington post in 2018 knowingly that what she was saying was false,

she did it recklessly. that is a huge bar for she did it recklessly. that is a huge barfor you she did it recklessly. that is a huge bar for you to she did it recklessly. that is a huge barfor you to climb over in america. in america liable cases tend not to be very successful because there is the protection of free speech. also remember, johnny depp lost his case two years ago in the uk. that wasn't him versus heard, that was him versus the british tabloid the sun put up with her son had accused him of being a wife beater. in the end the judge her son had accused him of being a wife beater. in the end thejudge in that case ruled that a lot of the allegations that amber heard made against him, she was a witness in a particular trial in the uk were substantially true. but here in america he has won that case and it is a real rejection of the accounts of abuse that amber heard said she suffered in that merits. total victory forjohnny depp. thank you, we will come _ victory forjohnny depp. thank you, we will come back— victory forjohnny depp. thank you, we will come back to _ victory forjohnny depp. thank you, we will come back to you _ victory forjohnny depp. thank you, we will come back to you in - victory forjohnny depp. thank you, we will come back to you in a - we will come back to you in a moment. we are focusing on the main entrance into the court in fairfax

to see whether amber heard is going run the gauntlet as you say, largely johnny depp supporting crowd. it's fair to say that she's had a fairly uncomfortable time arriving each day during the course of the proceedings because there is clearly a majority of people in the crowd and they will be those who support her, wondering whether that may have inference the jury, thejury whether that may have inference the jury, the jury warned whether that may have inference the jury, thejury warned not whether that may have inference the jury, the jury warned not to whether that may have inference the jury, thejury warned not to be influence other than the words hurt influence other than the words hurt in the court and the judgment of the performance of the two principles in this case. and illegal teams. and there are witnesses who have been extensive as we've heard in early two earlier, kate moss gave a deposition in support ofjohnny depp from her hold in the united kingdom. there were a number of other people who gave evidence as well in the course of the hearing. we are waiting for it not only whether she comes out with her head held high, despite the devastating verdict against both her finances and her

reputation says she has been described by the jury as having acted with malice and made a false statement, accusing her husband of this violence. interesting contrast betweenjohnny depp this violence. interesting contrast between johnny depp fate this violence. interesting contrast betweenjohnny depp fate when he sued the sun unsuccessfully in the uk. which is quite different libel laws from those operating in the united states, the much more restrictive in the uk which is why many international defenders choose to pursue their damage cases in the uk because it's frankly easier to get a verdict on way or the other. this makes it surprising therefore, who exactly... how this actually happened. we are going to talk now to somebody who's metjohnny depp. madam in newcastle in the uk. gary, hello to you.

madam in newcastle in the uk. gary, hello to you— hello to you. what you make of this? it was very surreal _ hello to you. what you make of this? it was very surreal meeting _ hello to you. what you make of this? it was very surreal meeting johnny i it was very surreal meeting johnny in newcastle, in terms of the verdict, i think it's an important one and it's the right one. i was happy to have wished him luck earlier on and i'm glad for the outcome. earlier on and i'm glad for the outcome-— earlier on and i'm glad for the outcome. , . ., . . outcome. domestic violence... can i ask ou outcome. domestic violence... can i ask you honestly. — outcome. domestic violence... can i ask you honestly, how _ outcome. domestic violence... can i ask you honestly, how do _ outcome. domestic violence... can i ask you honestly, how do you - outcome. domestic violence... can i ask you honestly, how do you knowl ask you honestly, how do you know it's the right one?— it's the right one? domestic violence and _ it's the right one? domestic violence and abuse - it's the right one? domestic violence and abuse are - it's the right one? domestic violence and abuse are very| it's the right one? domestic - violence and abuse are very serious issues. when somebody uses a platform like amber heard has to say things which have now been declared as malice and falls, it does irreparable damage to the struggle for women's rights and equality and safety and things like that. in terms of this, it's the right verdict forjohnny, is the right verdict forjohnny, is the right verdict forjohnny, is the right verdict for activists around the world and i think it's important to

allow that to sink in a little bit. i think we've got a photo of the two of you together. i think we've got a photo of the two of you together-— i think we've got a photo of the two of you together. what was is taking? that was in newcastle. _ of you together. what was is taking? that was in newcastle. just - of you together. what was is taking? that was in newcastle. just before i that was in newcastle. just before when? about 45 minutes ago. tastes that was in newcastle. just before when? about 45 minutes ago. was he on his way somewhere, _ when? about 45 minutes ago. was he on his way somewhere, was _ when? about 45 minutes ago. was he on his way somewhere, was he... - when? about 45 minutes ago. was he on his way somewhere, was he... did| on his way somewhere, was he... did he tell you — on his way somewhere, was he... d c he tell you about his plans? i wish them good luck, shook his hand and he said thank you, he was very gracious and smiling. i was glad to have met him. gracious and smiling. i was glad to have met him-— gracious and smiling. i was glad to have met him. sure. you made clear our view have met him. sure. you made clear your view but — have met him. sure. you made clear your view but he _ have met him. sure. you made clear your view but he had _ have met him. sure. you made clear your view but he had lost _ have met him. sure. you made clear your view but he had lost two - have met him. sure. you made clear your view but he had lost two years i your view but he had lost two years ago, he won this time. it does feel ago, he won this time. it does feel a bit of a lottery the sort of cases, don't they? i a bit of a lottery the sort of cases, don't they? i think it's been a lenath cases, don't they? i think it's been a lengthy ease- _ cases, don't they? i think it's been a lengthy case. the _ cases, don't they? i think it's been a lengthy case. the information . cases, don't they? i think it's been | a lengthy case. the information and evidence was all laid out in court. the world has been watching. what's important is not the public opinion, it is the verdict of the court and

the jury. it is the verdict of the court and the 'u . . , ., it is the verdict of the court and the 'u . . ,., . ,, it is the verdict of the court and the 'u . . . ,, thejury. fairpoint. thank you. thank you _ thejury. fairpoint. thank you. thank you for— thejury. fairpoint. thank you. thank you for sharing - thejury. fairpoint. thank you. thank you for sharing that - thejury. fairpoint. thank you. i thank you for sharing that photo. thejury. fairpoint. thank you. - thank you for sharing that photo. we at least now know where he is. we knew he was somewhere between london and manchester because of thejeff beck concerts, the reason is over here in the uk. we can speak now to haleem dhanidina, who's a lawyer and former judge from california. i think you are back practising law. you've been following this case, what do you make of both the progress of the case and the verdicts we've had delivered in the last few minutes? to verdicts we've had delivered in the last few minutes?— verdicts we've had delivered in the last few minutes? to me it's been a fascinatin: last few minutes? to me it's been a fascinating case _ last few minutes? to me it's been a fascinating case largely _ last few minutes? to me it's been a fascinating case largely because - last few minutes? to me it's been a fascinating case largely because we| fascinating case largely because we don't get a lot of highly publicised defamation cases, as some of you ever guess it pointed out. defamation can be very hard to prove. we don't see a lot of these

trials make it all the way as far as this one did. for that reason, i think were all curious to know what this jury was think were all curious to know what thisjury was going think were all curious to know what this jury was going to make of this relationship betweenjohnny depp and amber heard and whether that would translate into legal liability. now that we see that it has on both accounts. i that we see that it has on both accounts. , , ,.,, that we see that it has on both accounts-— that we see that it has on both accounts. , , , ., accounts. i suppose the question will be unclear _ accounts. i suppose the question will be unclear in _ accounts. i suppose the question will be unclear in peoples- accounts. i suppose the question will be unclear in peoples minds| accounts. i suppose the question. will be unclear in peoples minds is whether or not it is possible any of the social media noise, the real noise outside the court can in any way have influenced your view of what they saw and heard in court? that's really difficult question because that kind of thing we wouldn't see in the uk because the libel laws are so strict that you can't really talk about active court proceedings. you certainly can't pitch in with your opinion on a live court case. you certainly wouldn't get on the media to do it until the verdicts have come through or the judgment to come through. to be tuite judgment to come through. to be quite honest. i— judgment to come through. to be quite honest, i don't— judgment to come through. to be quite honest, i don't think - judgment to come through. to be quite honest, i don't think it's - quite honest, i don't think it's good to be a difficult question to

answer. if this trial follows the pattern of the highly publicised trials, we will be hearing from these jurors trials, we will be hearing from thesejurors in trials, we will be hearing from these jurors in fairly short order. they are released from their gag order and they are now free to talk about the case. it would shock me if we didn't hear from at least some jurors who will be more than willing to be interviewed for the may want to start getting some phone numbers was up good advice. they will be willing to talk to you about whether the internet or any noise affected deliberations. they may not admit it but they'll be willing to talk about it. do but they'll be willing to talk about it. , ., ~ but they'll be willing to talk about it. do you think the defamation laws work in the — it. do you think the defamation laws work in the united _ it. do you think the defamation laws work in the united states? - it. do you think the defamation laws work in the united states? rc, - it. do you think the defamation laws work in the united states? rc, i - work in the united states? rc, i think they _ work in the united states? rc, i think they do. _ work in the united states? rc, i think they do. in _ work in the united states? rc, i think they do. in the _ work in the united states? rc, i think they do. in the united - work in the united states? tii1,i think they do. in the united states we are very proud of ourjudicial tradition that allegations, accusations are just that. they are just allegations. if those allegations are not proved in a court of law then they are to be

seen with doubt and with suspicion. and when the case of allegations like what we have here, allegations that actually cause really significant financial damage, a person cannotjust significant financial damage, a person cannot just freely throw them around without there being some consequence. i around without there being some consequence-— consequence. i think that's what we've seen _ consequence. i think that's what we've seen here. _ consequence. i think that's what we've seen here. do _ consequence. i think that's what we've seen here. do you - consequence. i think that's what we've seen here. do you think. consequence. i think that's what i we've seen here. do you think your laws... i mean these are two high—profile wealthy and successful individuals, they were to aldi and successful individuals, do you think your laws work better at protecting ordinary folk whose reputations are defamed then british laws to? a lot of people see british libel laws is whether rich and powerful camp because i get up verdict that suits them better. they are less comfortable in an environment like yours where freedom of speech often overrules of questions of dear isaiah, the truth or not. it’s overrules of questions of dear isaiah, the truth or not. it's hard to make that _ isaiah, the truth or not. it's hard to make that case, _ isaiah, the truth or not. it's hard to make that case, and speciallyj to make that case, and specially in light of what happened tojohnny depp. of course his lawsuit in

england did not fare too well for him, in fact he had a court basically saying that if the evidence was clear, he was a spousal abuser. and here in the united states the jury result says otherwise. it's really hard to tell. one thing i think it is clear is that in the united states, for better or worse, the laws do apply differently depending on what your resources are. certainly what you have seen is what a difference in advocacy, how that could result in a certain verdict. i think one of the things that was going to be examined over and over again for this child is the extent to which not the internet but the attorneys performances may have contributed to the result in this case was up there was a clear difference in the quality of lawyering betweenjohnny depp seem in amber heard team. flan

quality of lawyering betweenjohnny depp seem in amber heard team. cant depp seem in amber heard team. can i briefly enter — depp seem in amber heard team. can i briefly enter you _ depp seem in amber heard team. can i briefly enter you and _ depp seem in amber heard team. can i briefly enter you and give you the words that have just been issued in a statement from amber heard, whether she's going to deliver these on the steps of the court, we don't know but the crowd is waiting for her to appear. in a statementjust released she says, "the disappointment i feel today is beyond words. just picking up on that and what you're saying, do you think actually the disappointment she ought to feel ought to be towards her legal team? i was talking to a lawyer on friday of last week and said thatjohnny depp legal team kind of, not wipe the floor but were much sharper, much quicker, they were much better at challenging, interrupting when they felt that amber heard was going off the point or she couldn't substantiate something. and johnny depp was given a lot more kind of slack by amber heard's legal team. it may be a conscious decision but this lawyer felt that actually on balance, that it had an impact. i balance, that it had an impact. i have to agree. i don't always

balance, that it had an impact. i have to agree. i don't always feel comfortable being overly critical of trial attorneys. comfortable being overly critical of trialattorneys. i comfortable being overly critical of trial attorneys. i was on my cell for many years and i am again now. it's not easy to be in a very dynamic, contemporaneous environment that a child provides. but you could see time and time again in this trial how her team was failing to take advantage of potential openings, miss deming, and making decisions that were counterproductive, from a strategic and tactical standpoint they were out mastered in this case. this and tactical standpoint they were out mastered in this case. as you brina ou out mastered in this case. as you bring you the _ out mastered in this case. as you bring you the reaction _ out mastered in this case. as you bring you the reaction from - out mastered in this case. as you | bring you the reaction from johnny depp as we learned earlier from talking to gary, he is in a pub in newcastle. maybe he still knew inc. in newcastle. if it did not want to speak to us will be delighted to speak to us will be delighted to speak to us will be delighted to speak to him he issued a statement saying the jury gave me my life, speak to him he issued a statement saying thejury gave me my life, i am truly humbled. thejury saying thejury gave me my life, i am truly humbled. the jury gave saying thejury gave me my life, i am truly humbled. thejury gave him his life back but his voice to do a betterjob either in making the case to the jury.

betterjob either in making the case to thejury. in betterjob either in making the case to the 'u . ., betterjob either in making the case tothe'u . ., . , to the jury. in our adversary system. _ to the jury. in our adversary system. good _ to the jury. in our adversary system, good lawyers - to the jury. in our adversary i system, good lawyers matter. to the jury. in our adversary - system, good lawyers matter. i don't think there is any doubt to that statement and this trial has tonight is just further evidence of that. if you have the right legal team with the right experience and strategy, good things are to happen for you in court. i thinkjohnny depp is deep be congratulated for his choice of counsel in this case was up one final question, what do you make of the damages thejury final question, what do you make of the damages the jury has awarded? this the damages the jury has awarded? as a judge was saying before hand, entirely free to put any amount on their coupons that they see fit. the dama . es their coupons that they see fit. tie: damages portion for their coupons that they see fit. tj9: damages portion for me their coupons that they see fit. tj9 damages portion for me as a little bit of a law nerd was the most interesting part. thejury clearly didn'tjust rubber—stamp the request for $50 million, certainly not for $100 million, there was some thought that went into how much they wanted to give as compensatory damage, how much is punitive damage and of course they awarded johnny depp and amber heard damages in the millions.

of course mr depp gets more. itjust shows that thejury, of course mr depp gets more. itjust shows that the jury, without a lot of clear guidance did at least carefully consider the amounts that were in question.— were in question. judge haleem dhanidina, _ were in question. judge haleem dhanidina, thank— were in question. judge haleem dhanidina, thank you _ were in question. judge haleem dhanidina, thank you very - were in question. judge haleem dhanidina, thank you very much were in question. judge haleem i dhanidina, thank you very much for being with us. a pleasure to speak to you. we are grateful for your time and thank you. we are still waiting, the scene outside the court shows you the expectation they are hoping amber heard will appear. she hasissued hoping amber heard will appear. she has issued that statement, could not quite possible she's leaving by a different entrance of the kurt two court because she had it not entirely pleasant time. let's talk about that noise is off to katie edwards. katie is a writer and broadcaster and you have looked at this question, why such hostility to amber heard, particularly online? i

amber heard, particularly online? i think it'sjust been really think it's just been really depressing, what we see it online in particular because we have seen overwhelming support forjohnny depp, it's so much further, it is mute did not move to abusive of amber heard. regardless of what the verdict is, it's clear that she has been abused online. for weeks and weeks she's had her name trending with awful derisory comments and also in the courtroom when she was giving her testimony, johnny depp and his counsel were laughing, snickering, there's been a real disrespect shown. i think for anyone who is considering reporting domestic violence or sexual violence i think this is a very troubling... it's a cultural moment, this is very worrying. it's a cultural moment, this is very wor int. :, :, :, it's a cultural moment, this is very wor inc. :, :, :, worrying. can i read to you the statement. — worrying. can i read to you the statement, we've _ worrying. can i read to you the statement, we've got - worrying. can i read to you the statement, we've got a - worrying. can i read to you the statement, we've got a longer| statement, we've got a longer version, this is been issued by the pr firm who she has hired to

represent her. and the statement is, "the disappointment i feel today is beyond words, i'm heartbroken at the mountain of evidence was still not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence and sway of my ex—husband. "i'm even more disappointed but what is verdict means or other women's, it sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be publicly shamed and humiliated, it's takes back the idea that violence against women is to be taken seriously. i believejohnny�*s attorney succeed in getting the juries to overlook key issues of freedom of speech and ignore evidence that was so conclusive that we want in the uk. i'm sad i losses case, i am sadder still that i seem to of lost a right i thought i had as an american to speak freely and openly. "it's a heartfelt statement for them it has to be set against thejudgment of a jury for them it has to be set against the judgment of a jury who sat through the evidence, heard her, her johnny depp, or the other witnesses and reach a unanimous verdict. yes

but there was _ and reach a unanimous verdict. yes but there was a _ and reach a unanimous verdict. 193 but there was a trial in and reach a unanimous verdict. j93 but there was a trial in the uk where they found that it was very likely thatjohnny depp did assault amber heard and 12 out of 14 cases. i think your last guest really nailed it when they said that it depends on the legal team. what we know now is that it oozed that the greatest resources, who can put together the most crack legal team who are going to do the job. together the most crack legal team who are going to do thejob. again, that's really troubling for anyone who's experienced sexual violence, domestic violence. they are working against them on who has a lot more power and a lot more financial resources in them. it's telling us something that we are not already knew and it's a cultural moment, unfortunately it's also resurrected a lot of sexist ideas that we thought we put to rest, perhaps through me to but it hasn't. figs

thought we put to rest, perhaps through me to but it hasn't. as good ask ou through me to but it hasn't. as good ask you what — through me to but it hasn't. as good ask you what you — through me to but it hasn't. as good ask you what you think _ through me to but it hasn't. as good ask you what you think might - through me to but it hasn't. as good ask you what you think might be - through me to but it hasn't. as good ask you what you think might be the | ask you what you think might be the effect on other people considering legal action or are considering taking action, particularly against somebody prominent, if they feel they've been abused? and he could be a man, could be a woman. these things as you as i note, they're not gender specific even though the vast majority of cases sexual violence by men against women, that it's not exclusively the case but let's just say anyone in those spectacular circumstances.— say anyone in those spectacular circumstances. :, circumstances. what i was watching it, 'ust the circumstances. what i was watching it, just the fact— circumstances. what i was watching it, just the fact that _ circumstances. what i was watching it, just the fact that she _ circumstances. what i was watching it, just the fact that she had - circumstances. what i was watching it, just the fact that she had to - it, just the fact that she had to give testimony about sexual violence right in front of the person that she was making allegations against. she had to see the legal team. they were smiling, smirking, she had to do that while looking at their expressions. i think that anyone...

there wasn't a screen or anything, there was nothing done to make that any easier for her. i there was nothing done to make that any easierfor her. i think there was nothing done to make that any easier for her. i think that this hasjust been any easier for her. i think that this has just been appalling... any easier for her. i think that this hasjust been appalling... i'm not talking about the verdict, i'm talking about everything that's gone before including the online stuff, including stuff from the courtroom, i think anyone who has experienced sexual violence or domestic violence and its against someone who is more powerful, i think most people are going to think twice about doing that. and i don't blame them. katie edwards, writer _ that. and i don't blame them. katie edwards, writer and _ that. and i don't blame them. katie edwards, writer and broadcaster who is look at the impact of this case and some of the vile stuff being set on mine, thank you very much for that will be interesting to see when we get a full response from johnny depp whether or not he chooses perhaps to call out some of the people who had said some pretty vile things supposedly in his support. and disassociate himself from those

remarks. let's talk to are corresponded greg mckenzie. picking up corresponded greg mckenzie. picking up on the background, what have we had in terms of reaction so far? the verdicts only come in and the last 40 minutes or so.— verdicts only come in and the last 40 minutes or so. there hasn't been much statement _ 40 minutes or so. there hasn't been much statement coming _ 40 minutes or so. there hasn't been much statement coming to - 40 minutes or so. there hasn't been much statement coming to a - 40 minutes or so. there hasn't been much statement coming to a file. i 40 minutes or so. there hasn't been | much statement coming to a file. we get the statement from johnny depp, that tiny statement from him and also amber heard statement. presumably a camera crew in newcastle. presumably a camera crew in newcastle-— presumably a camera crew in newcastle. ,, :,~ :, :, , newcastle. staking out the hotels and -u-s newcastle. staking out the hotels and pubs looking _ newcastle. staking out the hotels and pups looking for— newcastle. staking out the hotels and pups looking forjohnny - newcastle. staking out the hotels and pups looking forjohnny depp| and pups looking forjohnny depp right now to comment further about the case with up as your last guest essay, with allegations flying around, serious allegations and ultimately there are no winners in this case. :, �* , , this case. that's the interesting thin . , this case. that's the interesting thing. not _ this case. that's the interesting thing. not only _ this case. that's the interesting thing, not only the _ this case. that's the interesting thing, not only the financial - this case. that's the interesting thing, not only the financial but the reputational damage to both of them. mil the reputational damage to both of them. : :, :, :, , , them. all of that. ultimately this was a relationship _ them. all of that. ultimately this was a relationship gone - them. all of that. ultimately this was a relationship gone bad - them. all of that. ultimately this was a relationship gone bad and | was a relationship gone bad and certain things have happened that now the world knows about. i think her losing today as she said, she said she lost the case in those closing statements before the trial ended she said that this had been a

horror two horrible, humiliating time for her and she said every day she's had to relive the trauma, turning up to court having to testify against him when she accused of assaulting her, sexually assaulting her. people say winners and losers but ultimately there are no winners in this case with reputation and damages for both sides, work and their personal lives. :, :, :, :, lives. one final thought on that, we already saw — lives. one final thought on that, we already saw some _ lives. one final thought on that, we already saw some suggestion - lives. one final thought on that, we already saw some suggestion that l already saw some suggestion that johnny depp lost work as a result of the original legal action, which he lost when he sued the sun in the uk. what of the prospects now for ever hurts career in the light of this? it's hard to say butjohnny depp did lose a lot of endorsements one did stick with them, one perfume company, they remained, he remained the figurehead of the advertising campaign. but others to go the other way and decided to drop them from their campaigns, there could be a

case answerfor that, he their campaigns, there could be a case answer for that, he could now go after them. we just don't know. thank you very much. that is the verdict from the court you are watching bbc news. let's return to the court in fairfax virginia. i'm sorry we lost you earlier because of the movement and the events happening. we are waiting to see whether or not amber heard emerges outside the court. if we spot her we will yell so that you can turn around and see what she's saying and doing. in the meantime, tell me a bit of the crowd at moment. ijust bit of the crowd at moment. i 'ust want to say — bit of the crowd at moment. i 'ust want to say the i bit of the crowd at moment. i 'ust want to say the reason i bit of the crowd at moment. i 'ust want to say the reason why a h bit of the crowd at moment. that want to say the reason why a look a bit distracted is becausejohnny depp said legal team has been walking out and they have become stars, certainly for the johnny depp supporters. stars, certainly for thejohnny depp supporters. they are giving a press statement at the moment, i don't know if you're going to take that live. amber heard has already released a statement in which she

said that she was heartbroken at the verdict. johnny depp has released a statement in which he has thanked the jury statement in which he has thanked thejury for statement in which he has thanked the jury for returning my life back to me. ijust want to the jury for returning my life back to me. i just want to try and the jury for returning my life back to me. ijust want to try and tie this up a little bit because it is a very legally complicated case. in short,... ~ :, :, short,... where going to drop you. we've got — short,... where going to drop you. we've got a _ short,... where going to drop you. we've got a statement _ short,... where going to drop you. we've got a statement coming - short,... where going to drop you. | we've got a statement coming from outside the court.— outside the court. you're with us. --- devoted _ outside the court. you're with us. devoted an _ outside the court. you're with us. devoted an enormous - outside the court. you're with us. devoted an enormous amountj outside the court. you're with us. i devoted an enormous amount of time and resources with this case. ourjudicial system is predicated on each persons right to have his or her case — each persons right to have his or her case heard and we were honoured, truly honoured to assist mr deppe and ensuring that his case was clearly— and ensuring that his case was clearly considered throughout the triat~ _ clearly considered throughout the triat~ we — clearly considered throughout the trial. we were also mostly is that the trial— trial. we were also mostly is that the trial has resonated for so many people _ the trial has resonated for so many people in— the trial has resonated for so many people in the public who value truth and justice — people in the public who value truth andjustice. now people in the public who value truth and justice. now that the jury has reached _ and justice. now that the jury has reached its — and justice. now that the jury has reached its conclusive verdict it is time _ reached its conclusive verdict it is time to— reached its conclusive verdict it is time to turn— reached its conclusive verdict it is time to turn the page and look to

the future — time to turn the page and look to the future. thank you all so much. and thanks — the future. thank you all so much. and thanks to the jury.— the future. thank you all so much. and thanks to the jury. and thanks to the 'ury. thank you so much. how— and thanks to the 'ury. thank you so much. how is — and thanks to the jury. thank you so much. how is johnny _ and thanks to the jury. thank you so much. how is johnny feeling? - and thanks to the jury. thank you so much. how is johnny feeling? that l and thanks to the jury. thank you so | much. how is johnny feeling? that is a statement — much. how is johnny feeling? that is a statement from _ much. how is johnny feeling? that is a statement from the _ much. how is johnny feeling? that is a statement from the lawyers - much. how is johnny feeling? that is a statement from the lawyers who i a statement from the lawyers who spoke forjohnny depp in the hearings. let's see if we... will stay with those pictures for a few moments. will go back to our correspondent will have nothing to comment on the statement but you wanted to try and draw the threads. in the last couple of minutes we have before we have to make way for the context, let me ask you what your take are what heard today. this was a your take are what heard today. ti 3 was a complicated case because they both sued each other. johnny depp was the main case in which he accused amber heard of defaming him by writing this article in 2018. and the jury found that she did defame him. and also she then countersued

him, claiming that an article in which the quotes on his ex lawyer calling her allegations a hoax, defamed her and ruined her reputation. evidence of that the jury reputation. evidence of that the jury had ruled in herfavour i guess wouldn't try to say in short, they both want. the jury found they both did defame each other. but depp won so much more because injohnny depp scabies, thejury found so much more because injohnny depp scabies, the jury found that she did act with malice. that is a pretty high bar to act with malice. that is a pretty high barto climb act with malice. that is a pretty high bar to climb in america when it comes to the sort of libel claims. malice means that she wrote the statement, she acted with malice, she knew his falls, she acted recklessly. in essence, they both wanted as i say, but he won so much more. i think when you see a statement in which she says she's heartbroken about this, it shows that she knows she has ultimately lost for that and the damages she gets awarded don't mean much because she now has to pay him even more damages. just another point, the reaction outside court when it came

through that he won was huge. people shouting johnny, johnny, johnny. i spoke to a few fans and said they believed injohnny throughout spoke to a few fans and said they believed in johnny throughout the six week trial, the fans out here made quite clear they support him. social media has been lit up with this case, there are been hashtags forjohnny depp, justice forjohnny depp, hashtag amber heard is a liar. these hashtags have the billions and billions of views. forjohnny depp, not only did he win in court but he will look at it that is one in the court of public opinion. that will look at it that is one in the court of public opinion.- court of public opinion. at the verdict of _ court of public opinion. at the verdict of the _ court of public opinion. at the verdict of the verdict - court of public opinion. at the verdict of the verdict of - court of public opinion. at the verdict of the verdict of the i court of public opinion. at the - verdict of the verdict of the johnny verdict of the verdict of thejohnny depp, amber heard libel trial. thank you to be with bbc news. johnny depp saysin you to be with bbc news. johnny depp says in a statement from newcastle and united kingdom that is that his life back he thanks the jury for although they found that he had defamed amber heard, his former wife they found that it had not only defamed her but she had given a false statement and done so with malice in an article in the

washington post. this is bbc news. coming up injust few moments, new limit devon with this title the contacts. thank you for your company. hello, i'm nuala mcgovern. you're watching the context on bbc news. the hollywood starjonny depp has won his libel case against his ex—wife, the actress amber heard. a jury in the us state of virginia ruled an article written by her in the washington post was defamatory. hugs forjohnny depp's legal team — mr depp was not in court — but said afterwards, "thejury gave me my life back. i am truly humbled." in a statement, amber heard said, "the disappointment i feel today is beyond words." we'll analyse what the case might mean for the #metoo movement. also in the programme: the us has dismissed russian warnings that arming ukraine with advanced rocket artillery could lead to a direct confrontation. and it's 2—0 to ukraine in a game, as one fan coined it,

scotland against the world as they take on the war torn country