lovely to see you both again. a quick look through the front pages. platinum jubilee celebrations dominate the front pages. "maj—ical" is the headline in the metro, showing the queen's appearance on the buckingham palace balcony. the queen front and centre of the daily telegraph — the paper reports on her statement to the british public, saying the monarch has reaffirmed her commitment to serve the nation. the mirror also reflecting some of that statement, and showing her alongside prince george. meanwhile, the times reports that the members of the royal family appearing on the balcony are a "message" about the future of the monarchy. and it was a slimmed—down royal family, according to the i — but the paper also looks at boris johnson's future, saying a vote on his leadership could come this week.

the guardian claims the pm's allies are preparing for a no—confidence vote, and reports that borisjohnson will launch a policy fightback focusing on health and housing. that story continued in the financial times — but the paper leads with reports of a 90% drop in the value of public listings in the us and europe since the war in ukraine started. so that's a little flavour of what you'll be waking up to tomorrow. let's start with the daily telegraph. tony, it's over to you, a lovely picture there of her majesty in green and waving, as well. a surprise appearance. figs in green and waving, as well. a surprise appearance.— in green and waving, as well. a surprise appearance. as i'm sure man of surprise appearance. as i'm sure many of your — surprise appearance. as i'm sure many of your viewers _ surprise appearance. as i'm sure many of your viewers know, - surprise appearance. as i'm sure many of your viewers know, the | surprise appearance. as i'm sure - many of your viewers know, the queen was absent for most of thejubilee weekend celebrations. but she appeared at the balcony this

afternoon, and what an interesting four days it's been. we've had everything from paddington to the trooping colour street parties, to lighting beacons, to the derby, to all sorts of activities taking place all sorts of activities taking place all across the country. so certainly something i will remember. but like i said, i think it's interesting that this is an opportunity for us to look forward and think about what the royal family may be like ten years from now.— the royal family may be like ten years from now. caroline, on that front page — years from now. caroline, on that front page as _ years from now. caroline, on that front page as part _ years from now. caroline, on that front page as part of _ years from now. caroline, on that front page as part of this - years from now. caroline, on that front page as part of this report, | front page as part of this report, she is reaffirming her commitment to serve the nation. she'll be there for a while longer? she serve the nation. she'll be there for a while longer?— for a while longer? she is, she's alwa s for a while longer? she is, she's always made _ for a while longer? she is, she's always made that _ for a while longer? she is, she's always made that very _ for a while longer? she is, she's always made that very clear - for a while longer? she is, she'sl always made that very clear since those _ always made that very clear since those days — always made that very clear since those days on the go, she pledges to -ive those days on the go, she pledges to give her_ those days on the go, she pledges to give her life to our service. turns out she _ give her life to our service. turns out she wasn'tjust give her life to our service. turns out she wasn't just talking the talk a long _ out she wasn't just talking the talk a long time ago, here we are 70 years— a long time ago, here we are 70 years on. — a long time ago, here we are 70 years on, and she's pledging once again— years on, and she's pledging once again to _ years on, and she's pledging once again to live the rest of her life. the poiht — again to live the rest of her life. the point the queen has always made

is that— the point the queen has always made is that this _ the point the queen has always made is that this was an anointed position— is that this was an anointed position that she takes much more seriously— position that she takes much more seriously than people realise. so whatever— seriously than people realise. so whatever we may see of her, we won't — whatever we may see of her, we won't... prince charles and prince william _ won't... prince charles and prince william have _ won't... prince charles and prince william have both stepped up increasingly in recent weeks, we've seen _ increasingly in recent weeks, we've seen a _ increasingly in recent weeks, we've seen a surge of new duties on their shoulders — seen a surge of new duties on their shoulders. but the queen, in terms of her— shoulders. but the queen, in terms of her actuai— shoulders. but the queen, in terms of her actual monarchy, will never retire. _ of her actual monarchy, will never retire. she — of her actual monarchy, will never retire, she reminded us of that today — retire, she reminded us of that toda . ., ., today. the front page of the guardian. — today. the front page of the guardian, "humbled - today. the front page of the guardian, "humbled queen | today. the front page of the | guardian, "humbled queen it today. the front page of the - guardian, "humbled queen it brings forward a party to an end." let's look at the four days, what did you make of it all? i look at the four days, what did you make of it all?— make of it all? i didn't really know what to expect- — make of it all? i didn't really know what to expect- i _ make of it all? i didn't really know what to expect- i think _ make of it all? i didn't really know what to expect- i think it's - make of it all? i didn't really know what to expect- i think it's been . make of it all? i didn't really know what to expect- i think it's been a| what to expect— i think it's been a success, as one would expect, all the broadcasts and the royal functions have been carried out impeccably. and ijust wanted to say

that one of the important things to reflect on with the monarchy in britain is that it adapts, it's not the same as it was in 1952. there were elements within the government they didn't even want to televise they didn't even want to televise the coronation. so to go from that to the queen appearing with what i assume is some sort of live action paddington shows the way that the institution itself is developed and adapted to changing times. and when we look at the front page of the times, we see what the monarchy will probably look like in the future, which is fewer members, more focused on duties. ~ ., ., ~ which is fewer members, more focused on duties. ~ ., ., ,, ., on duties. what do you think about wh it's on duties. what do you think about why it's changed. _ on duties. what do you think about why it's changed, caroline, - on duties. what do you think about why it's changed, caroline, did - on duties. what do you think about why it's changed, caroline, did it . why it's changed, caroline, did it need to change?— why it's changed, caroline, did it need to change? we've talked about this in the past. _ need to change? we've talked about this in the past, the _ need to change? we've talked about this in the past, the events - need to change? we've talked about this in the past, the events of - this in the past, the events of 1997, not _ this in the past, the events of 1997, notjust the this in the past, the events of 1997, not just the tragic death of the prince — 1997, not just the tragic death of the prince of wales, but the huge people's— the prince of wales, but the huge people's reaction to it — i think the queen— people's reaction to it — i think the queen and the people and the

people _ the queen and the people and the peopie -- — the queen and the people and the people —— around her had a sharp shock, _ people —— around her had a sharp shock, realising they were out of touch _ shock, realising they were out of touch i— shock, realising they were out of touch. i think that was the sea change. — touch. i think that was the sea change, and everything we've seen in recent— change, and everything we've seen in recent years — if you look at east genders — recent years — if you look at east genders on — recent years — if you look at east genders on thursday, it's a seemingly spontaneous but every second _ seemingly spontaneous but every second detailed and planned of the princess— second detailed and planned of the princess of wales —— prince of wales in the _ princess of wales —— prince of wales in the duchess of cornwall —— eastenders. pinning a ribbon for domestic— eastenders. pinning a ribbon for domestic abuse — every button is pressed — domestic abuse — every button is pressed and they clearly have some very different people facing advisers around them, and i think we do dated _ advisers around them, and i think we do dated from 1997. we've seen that change _ do dated from 1997. we've seen that change ever. the do dated from 1997. we've seen that change ever-— change ever. the front page of the mirror, change ever. the front page of the mirror. we've _ change ever. the front page of the mirror, we've got _ change ever. the front page of the mirror, we've got great _ change ever. the front page of the mirror, we've got great granny - change ever. the front page of the mirror, we've got great granny in l mirror, we've got great granny in george there. i do think that lewis stole the show, with the celebrations —— louis. i don't know if you caught some of his facial

expressions and engaging with mum, as well, tony. i expressions and engaging with mum, as well. tony— as well, tony. i happened to catch him on the — as well, tony. i happened to catch him on the balcony. _ as well, tony. i happened to catch him on the balcony. i— as well, tony. i happened to catch him on the balcony. i guess that's| him on the balcony. i guess that's what happens with any child of that age, they'll act up a bit. prince william did the same when he was a young person on the balcony — it's the light relief between everyone on a very formal occasion, a kid who gets bored and tired really easily. let's go to the front page of the times, caroline — you've both been mentioning it, the future of the monarchy, and the times has that balcony shot. "this is the future of the royal monarchy," that's what's being presented. what do you think the two major future kings will bring to the table? the the two major future kings will bring to the table? the message is clearly lean. _

bring to the table? the message is clearly lean, efficient _ bring to the table? the message is clearly lean, efficient people - clearly lean, efficient people facing — clearly lean, efficient people facing forward, the speech they gave last night, _ facing forward, the speech they gave last night, whilst prince charles's was very— last night, whilst prince charles's was very personal, we had prince william _ was very personal, we had prince william really using that platform again _ william really using that platform again to _ william really using that platform again to nail his colours to the nrast— again to nail his colours to the mast on— again to nail his colours to the mast on saving the planet, it's more fragile _ mast on saving the planet, it's more fragile than — mast on saving the planet, it's more fragile than ever — he's clearly aiigned — fragile than ever — he's clearly aligned himself to that cause and is very single—minded about it. but it does _ very single—minded about it. but it does bring — very single—minded about it. but it does bring about with that, as well, perhaps lean and efficient, but a lot of— perhaps lean and efficient, but a lot of weight and responsibility on very few_ lot of weight and responsibility on very few shoulders on that balcony. the royal _ very few shoulders on that balcony. the royal family, apart from the cambridge is, with the exit from that royai— cambridge is, with the exit from that royal stage of the sussex is a couple of — that royal stage of the sussex is a couple of years ago, this is who we are left— couple of years ago, this is who we are left with. so they'll obviously need _ are left with. so they'll obviously need a _ are left with. so they'll obviously need a hit — are left with. so they'll obviously need a bit of support —— a lot of support— need a bit of support —— a lot of support and _ need a bit of support —— a lot of support and goodwill their way. so it's a _ support and goodwill their way. so it's a lot _ support and goodwill their way. so it's a lot to— support and goodwill their way. so it's a lot to land on a decreased number— it's a lot to land on a decreased number of— it's a lot to land on a decreased number of people, i think. tony, are the suffixes — number of people, i think. tony, are the suffixes may _ number of people, i think. tony, are the suffixes may be _ number of people, i think. tony, are the suffixes may be just _ number of people, i think. tony, are the suffixes may be just moving - number of people, i think. tony, are the suffixes may be just moving a i the suffixes may be just moving a bit quicker? look at the royal

families of europe. if bit quicker? look at the royal families of europe.— bit quicker? look at the royal families of europe. if the royal families of europe. if the royal famil in families of europe. if the royal family in the — families of europe. if the royal family in the monarchy - families of europe. if the royal family in the monarchy is - families of europe. if the royal family in the monarchy is to i families of europe. if the royal - family in the monarchy is to survive in britain, they'll have to adapt and change. every monarch has a hand in that. queen victoria, for example, neverwent in that. queen victoria, for example, never went to the state opening of parliament, when henry vii became king, he made a big thing about bring back all the ceremonies. it's about being in tune with the public, and that's what the monarchy will have to do to survive. the guardian. _ will have to do to survive. the guardian, let's _ will have to do to survive. the guardian, let's turn _ will have to do to survive. the guardian, let's turn to politics — this could be potentially a big week for number ten, the country, and the conservative party. we don't quite know, lots of rumours swirling around. �* ., , know, lots of rumours swirling around. �* . , ., know, lots of rumours swirling around. �* . ., , around. i've always thought boris johnson around. i've always thought boris johnson was _ around. i've always thought boris johnson was extremely _ around. i've always thought boris johnson was extremely fortunate | around. i've always thought boris l johnson was extremely fortunate in johnson was extremely fortunate in his tinting, — johnson was extremely fortunate in his timing, as much as anything. he was the _ his timing, as much as anything. he was the mayor of london before the olympics. _ was the mayor of london before the olympics, we saw him as the queens prime _ olympics, we saw him as the queens prime minister for her platinum jubilee. — prime minister for her platinum jubilee, these great occasions of

state _ jubilee, these great occasions of state and — jubilee, these great occasions of state and pump to remind us of britain— state and pump to remind us of britain on— state and pump to remind us of britain on his best, he rides in on those _ britain on his best, he rides in on those coat— britain on his best, he rides in on those coat every time. however it's not looking — those coat every time. however it's not looking so cosy, and those boots will he _ not looking so cosy, and those boots will be ringing in his ears from when — will be ringing in his ears from when he — will be ringing in his ears from when he appeared on friday. but now there's— when he appeared on friday. but now there's been— when he appeared on friday. but now there's been a shift in his ministers around him from "don't be ridiculous, _ ministers around him from "don't be ridiculous, this will never happen" to" oh— ridiculous, this will never happen" to" oh it _ ridiculous, this will never happen" to" oh it might happen but it's clear— to" oh it might happen but it's clear he'll— to" oh it might happen but it's clear he'll win it." the problem is for the _ clear he'll win it." the problem is for the people who put in those letters — for the people who put in those letters and have had huge critical thought— letters and have had huge critical thought since the partygate report has come — thought since the partygate report has come out is, is this the best time to? — has come out is, is this the best time to? because if he does proceed to this no—confidence vote and wins it even— to this no—confidence vote and wins it even try— to this no—confidence vote and wins it even by one vote, then he's completely secure for a year, even with these — completely secure for a year, even with these by elections coming along and any— with these by elections coming along and any other revelations that may come _ and any other revelations that may come his— and any other revelations that may come his way. so it's all about timing — come his way. so it's all about timing - — come his way. so it's all about timing — and he does seem to be very luci

to this threat of a no—confidence vote. to this threat of a no-confidence vote. ., ., , . ., vote. that would be in character. david cameron _ vote. that would be in character. david cameron once _ vote. that would be in character. david cameron once called - vote. that would be in character. david cameron once called him l vote. that would be in character. david cameron once called him a j david cameron once called him a greased piglet, once you think you've got him in his grasp, he escapes. look, whether or not there is a leadership election this week or later in the summer, or in the autumn, it's pretty clear to me the prime minister is damaged. what's also really clear to me as of the public have made up their minds about him, and the public don't think he's been telling the truth about partygate. partygate isn't some insignificant westminster lead story, this is about people breaking the rules that were made at downing street while other people weren't able to see their relatives who were dying. i think that to me personally explains why this just won't go away, because many, many people feel deeply offended by the way in which people in downing street were behaving. so whether or not it's this week or next week, the prime

minister's leadership and his administration has been damaged by this and it will continue to be damaged. i don't think at some point the public will turn around and say, "we've forgiven the deep hurt we've found the macro felt and we found out about these parties."- found the macro felt and we found out about these parties." looking at the financial — out about these parties." looking at the financial times, _ out about these parties." looking at the financialtimes, rebels- out about these parties." looking at the financial times, rebels closing i the financial times, rebels closing in onjohnson — what are they risking? while they wait for the bye election to make their move, using the by elections as their sounding board? —— will they wait? the by elections as their sounding board? -- will they wait?- board? -- will they wait? they've mentioned _ board? -- will they wait? they've mentioned they _ board? -- will they wait? they've mentioned they may _ board? -- will they wait? they've mentioned they may try - board? -- will they wait? they've mentioned they may try to - board? -- will they wait? they've mentioned they may try to push l board? -- will they wait? they've| mentioned they may try to push to delay— mentioned they may try to push to delay it _ mentioned they may try to push to delay it till— mentioned they may try to push to delay it till the other side of these — delay it till the other side of these lry— delay it till the other side of these by elections, they seem pretty confident that they will be able to appeal— confident that they will be able to appeal as — confident that they will be able to appeal as much with the sue gray report— appeal as much with the sue gray report allegations. what sticks in my craw — report allegations. what sticks in my craw is — report allegations. what sticks in my craw is that this is what seems to be, _ my craw is that this is what seems to be, how— my craw is that this is what seems to be, how can we better replace our ieader— to be, how can we better replace our leader to _ to be, how can we better replace our leader to ensure the continuation of the party? — leader to ensure the continuation of the party? there's not enough chat

about what — the party? there's not enough chat about what he did was wrong and i can't _ about what he did was wrong and i can't serve — about what he did was wrong and i can't serve under him." we've seen very. _ can't serve under him." we've seen very. very— can't serve under him." we've seen very, very little of that, a couple of brave — very, very little of that, a couple of brave meerkats above the precipice, but it seems about counting _ precipice, but it seems about counting the numbers and seeing what serves— counting the numbers and seeing what serves them — and as tony said, that is as— serves them — and as tony said, that is as offensive — serves them — and as tony said, that is as offensive as anything. serves them - and as tony said, that is as offensive as anything.— is as offensive as anything. well, who would _ is as offensive as anything. well, who would replace _ is as offensive as anything. well, who would replace boris - is as offensive as anything. h who would replace borisjohnson, tony? i who would replace boris johnson, ton ? ., �* ~ ., who would replace boris johnson, ton? «m,, who would replace boris johnson, ton ? ~ ., , who would replace boris johnson, ton? , , tony? i don't know, but the point is these processes _ tony? i don't know, but the point is these processes exist _ tony? i don't know, but the point is these processes exist for _ tony? i don't know, but the point is these processes exist for the - these processes exist for the reason. the tories will have to find another leader when that happens, and i do think it is likely to happen. but ijust want and i do think it is likely to happen. but i just want to and i do think it is likely to happen. but ijust want to point out one other thing, which is there's something called the dissolution of parliament act, which became law in march, which returns us to the situation where the prime minister can effectively call a general election anytime he wants. so that's an outside chance, he may decide that he wants to go to the country, rather than have all these tory mps.

but it would be a very risky strategy. then again, borisjohnson takes risks. so there are lots of things floating around here. but like i said, the fund mental thing is this isn't a split in the party about policy or ideology, it's about the prime minister's behaviour. and that makes it interesting for me because normally leadership elections aren't about that, they are about really big splits in the party over europe or whatever. but this is about whether or not tory mps think they're better off without johnson in terms of winning the next election. but it's worth pointing out thatjohnson can decide when the next election is. it’s out that johnson can decide when the next election is.— next election is. it's about survival. _ next election is. it's about survival, is _ next election is. it's about survival, is out _ next election is. it's about survival, is out you - next election is. it's about survival, is out you are - next election is. it's about - survival, is out you are saying? effectively, yeah. me survival, is out you are saying? effectively, yeah.— survival, is out you are saying? effectively, yeah. we will leave it there. effectively, yeah. we will leave it there- what _ effectively, yeah. we will leave it there. what a _ effectively, yeah. we will leave it there. what a weekend! - effectively, yeah. we will leave it there. what a weekend! think . effectively, yeah. we will leave it | there. what a weekend! think you both very much indeed, have a cracking week ahead. that's it for the papers this evening.

until next time, goodbye. hello, and welcome to the film review on bbc news. to take us through this week's cinema releases is mark kermode. what have you got for us this week, mark? a very exciting week. we have men, which is a horror—inflected fairy tale. we have major, which is inspired by a true story of heroism. and bergman island — can life and art ever be separated? men — the clip of this gives me the creeps so much that i don't think i could bring myself to watch it! and you say it's some kind of fantasy horror? yes. let me try and sell it to you. so, it's by alex garland,

who wrote and directed ex machina and annihilation. i think it's like a playfully twisted fairy tale about gender. jessie buckley is harper. she's come out of an abusive relationship. she decides to go off to a country retreat to what she calls the "dream country house" with the emphasis on dream, because everything about what we're looking at tells us, you know, there's an apple tree outside from which apples fall. the grass is overly green. the house itself is kind of almost blood red. while she's there, she encounters a series of men. all of them are a bit creepy and all of them are played by rory kinnear. here's a clip. what is it? what's happened? what are you doing here? has it come back? why aren't you replying?

she gasps