hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are sienna rodgers, senior writer at the house magazine, and rachel watson, scottish political editor at the scottish sun. thank you forjoining us. quick look through the front pages. the metro's front page focuses on the former british soldierjordan gatley, who's reported to have been killed while fighting in the war in ukraine. the daily mail leads on the government's rwanda asylum—seeker policy. the paper calls the potential ban on putting people on the first flight to rwanda a "farce". the i newspaper also follows the story, saying the delay could be caused if the policy is blocked by the court of appeal on monday. the ft reports on the northern ireland trade deal, as conservative backbenchers apply pressure on the prime minister to rip it up.

the guardian features a stark warning from the confederation of british industry that overriding the northern irish deal will damage uk investment. the times leads on what it calls a crackdown on universities, who could be forced to reveal investment from "foreign actors" in a bid "to stop uk values from being compromised". according to the daily mirror, borisjohnson is to shelve plans to extend free school meals to all children living in poverty. "one million kids to go hungry" is its headline. and the daily express covers the rail strikes expected to take place this summer, as ministers vow to do whatever it takes to prevent the rail unions holding britain to ransom. let us begin our chat. we're going

to start with the daily telegraph. lovely to have you back. rolando has hit back at criticism of the migrant scheme —— rwanda. it heated up and we got the verdict from the judge at the high court. so, rwanda have responded. what did they say? figs high court. 50, rwanda have responded. what did they say? as you sa , this is responded. what did they say? as you say. this is really _ responded. what did they say? as you say, this is really heated _ responded. what did they say? as you say, this is really heated up _ responded. what did they say? as you say, this is really heated up the - say, this is really heated up the controversy around this and i don't expect it to cool down anytime this week. if you look at the papers tomorrow, it's one of the main stories. the telegraph have stated a different angle. they have the high commissioner who hits back at criticism. what people who are taking it will be treated with... he said it will be a safe haven for people who are diverted to rwanda,

but this isn'tjust... this is criticism of the scheme altogether. there is huge contempt from campaigners opposite. not that it's rwanda particularly, but the fact that you are removing people... people are trying to get the uk and are being removed and they don't want to go there. that's a huge part of it and i think if you look a across the papers, it looks unlikely we'll will seek —— we will see any people... it's notjust the court of appeal. it's all these individual cases. we went from around 100 people expected to 31. there is a source in the telegraph saying they expected to be single figures. i think this is a controversial topic and it has been meeting up —— eating

up and it has been meeting up —— eating up —— heating up. i think it will continue to get heated and more controversial. i continue to get heated and more controversial.— controversial. i think it's also this idea _ controversial. i think it's also this idea that _ controversial. i think it's also this idea that it's _ controversial. i think it's also this idea that it's a _ controversial. i think it's also this idea that it's a one-wayl this idea that it's a one—way ticket. this idea that it's a one-way ticket. w , this idea that it's a one-way ticket. , �* this idea that it's a one-way ticket. , ~ ., ., , ticket. exactly. a lot of people, for a long _ ticket. exactly. a lot of people, for a long time, _ ticket. exactly. a lot of people, for a long time, we _ ticket. exactly. a lot of people, for a long time, we were - ticket. exactly. a lot of people, - for a long time, we were discussing offshore _ for a long time, we were discussing offshore processing of asylum—seekers, so talking about using _ asylum—seekers, so talking about using various islands and other places— using various islands and other places to — using various islands and other places to process the applications, but this_ places to process the applications, but this is— places to process the applications, but this is not what the rwanda plan is about _ but this is not what the rwanda plan is about. probably a lot of people don't _ is about. probably a lot of people don't realise. this is about a one—way ticket to rwanda. if you try to come _ one—way ticket to rwanda. if you try to come to _ one—way ticket to rwanda. if you try to come to the uk in a way that prili _ to come to the uk in a way that priti patel has deemed illegal. that is different. this kind of op—ed from rwanda's high commissioner is basically— from rwanda's high commissioner is basically a _ from rwanda's high commissioner is basically a response not only to

charities, — basically a response not only to charities, campaigners and the labour— charities, campaigners and the labour party and other people who have criticised the plan. also unhcr, _ have criticised the plan. also unhcr, who said rwanda failed to meet _ unhcr, who said rwanda failed to meet the — unhcr, who said rwanda failed to meet the standards of legality. so, rwanda _ meet the standards of legality. so, rwanda and ready patel were making the argument, what you're saying is offensive _ the argument, what you're saying is offensive. they were capable of providing — offensive. they were capable of providing a safe environment, but at the moment, we basically don't know much _ the moment, we basically don't know much about— the moment, we basically don't know much about what will happen to asylum—seekers once they get there. if asylum—seekers once they get there. if they— asylum—seekers once they get there. if they do _ asylum—seekers once they get there. if they do and they managed to get some _ if they do and they managed to get some of— if they do and they managed to get some of these flights taking off. we don't know much about the conditions that they— don't know much about the conditions that they will be going into, so it there _ that they will be going into, so it there is— that they will be going into, so it there is some aspect to the objections around that particular concern — objections around that particular concern because there's just objections around that particular concern because there'sjust not much _ concern because there'sjust not much information about what it will be much information about what it will

he like _ much information about what it will be like. .. much information about what it will be like. ., , be like. same the telegraph. our second story _ be like. same the telegraph. our second story is — be like. same the telegraph. our second story is they'll _ be like. same the telegraph. our second story is they'll be - be like. same the telegraph. our second story is they'll be less - second story is they'll be less power given to the european court of justice. power given to the european court of justice. �* ., , , ., , , justice. another big story this week. justice. another big story this week- the — justice. another big story this week. the northern - justice. another big story this week. the northern ireland i week. the northern ireland protocol... the telegraph appears to have some leaked details around the legislation that liz trust will bring forward tomorrow on changes —— liz truss. that's what they've gone on for tomorrow. this priority they have her own powers being taken away orjudges being blocked for making final decisions around disputes that northern ireland has. when you read further down the story, it's described as a tactic that the uk government might use to get the eu back. so, how seriously is this as a

threat to the eu courts? they describe it as... they also have other details around this legislation would remove all customs checks from mainland britain into northern ireland and businesses will choose which regulations they want to follow. so i think this is another heated topic that tomorrow will begin to unravel more. we see that across the front pages. we see the rebellion that borisjohnson might face. we have the cbi talking about something tomorrow. there's another huge issue for the prime minister. ., ., , ., , minister. your thoughts on this cuickl , minister. your thoughts on this quickly, sienna. _

minister. your thoughts on this quickly, sienna. a _ minister. your thoughts on this quickly, sienna. a lot - minister. your thoughts on this quickly, sienna. a lot of - minister. your thoughts on this quickly, sienna. a lot of this i minister. your thoughts on this quickly, sienna. a lot of this is| quickly, sienna. a lot of this is auoin to quickly, sienna. a lot of this is going to be — quickly, sienna. a lot of this is going to be about _ quickly, sienna. a lot of this is going to be about the - quickly, sienna. a lot of this is - going to be about the disagreement within— going to be about the disagreement within the _ going to be about the disagreement within the conservative party, but also within— within the conservative party, but also within government, we've seen lots of tensions within cabinet over this northern ireland protocol bill, how hard _ this northern ireland protocol bill, how hard line should be be. for example. — how hard line should be be. for example, sajidjavid, less time, that similar bit of legislation, the kind of— that similar bit of legislation, the kind of thing that we're talking about— kind of thing that we're talking about now, he said he would refuse to vote _ about now, he said he would refuse to vote for— about now, he said he would refuse to vote for that bill because it reach — to vote for that bill because it reach -- _ to vote for that bill because it reach -- it— to vote for that bill because it reach —— it could breach international law. it will be interesting to see the unhappiness that some — interesting to see the unhappiness that some tory mps have over this extends— that some tory mps have over this extends to — that some tory mps have over this extends to ministers. 0k, the times looks at reforming the energy market. what have you gathered from this, rachel? yeah, this is... the —

gathered from this, rachel? yeah, this is... the times _ gathered from this, rachel? yeah, this is... the times have _ gathered from this, rachel? yeah, this is... the times have brandedl this is... the times have branded this is... the times have branded this the biggest reform in a decade, and it comes amid the cost of living crisis. people's energy bills are soaring, and the fact that electricity prices are linked to gas prices and it's about breaking that length, the uk government is looking at breaking that. there's been a lot of conversation around the last two months about the fact that a third of electricity in the uk comes from renewables, and therefore the price should not be linked to gas prices. this is one way the uk government appear to be looking at trying to tackle the crisis. if there was movement on this, it would be immediate. —— it would not. the benefits that could have on families trying to heat their homes and taking it away from those gas prices that we know are very unstable, and there's a number of things that can

cause gas prices to shoot up and fluctuate. we look at the war in ukraine right now and russia's impact, so i think this is one area that the uk government is looking at. i think many people would say the government should look at this as many ways as possible to try and ease cost pressures into the future as families struggle.— as families struggle. yeah, fiendishly _ as families struggle. yeah, fiendishly complicated, - as families struggle. yeah, fiendishly complicated, the as families struggle. yeah, - fiendishly complicated, the way the setup is was the you wonder why it was set up as complicated as it is. yeah, the energy markets, the whole thin- yeah, the energy markets, the whole thing is _ yeah, the energy markets, the whole thing is an— yeah, the energy markets, the whole thing is an absolute nightmare and we've _ thing is an absolute nightmare and we've seen— thing is an absolute nightmare and we've seen the kind of regulation here has— we've seen the kind of regulation here hasjust been completely failing — here hasjust been completely failing and it's a mess and it has been _ failing and it's a mess and it has been for— failing and it's a mess and it has been for such a long time. politicians have been talking about it for years — politicians have been talking about it for years and years. there was such— it for years and years. there was such controversy when ed miliband was talking about market reform and

price freezes and called a marxist for that— price freezes and called a marxist for that sort of thing. now we've -ot for that sort of thing. now we've gotiust— for that sort of thing. now we've gotjust because of not only for that sort of thing. now we've got just because of not only the war in ukraine, — got just because of not only the war in ukraine, but other factors, we've -ot in ukraine, but other factors, we've got a _ in ukraine, but other factors, we've got a situation coming more and more urgent _ got a situation coming more and more urgent. we're now talking about the long-term _ urgent. we're now talking about the long—term reforms such as this one that we _ long—term reforms such as this one that we should been talking about all the _ that we should been talking about all the long because we're now in a situation _ all the long because we're now in a situation where it is urgent —— all along _ situation where it is urgent —— all along its — situation where it is urgent —— all along. it's going to be... overall, absolutely— along. it's going to be... overall, absolutely huge gun people will not be able _ absolutely huge gun people will not be able to pay their bills, so it's 'ust be able to pay their bills, so it's just a simple as that. —— huge for people _ just a simple as that. —— huge for people. where the government's having _ people. where the government's having to — people. where the government's having to subsidise people's energy bills to _ having to subsidise people's energy bills to be _ having to subsidise people's energy bills to be talking about these long—term reforms. bills to be talking about these long-term reforms. sandpaper, different story. _ long-term reforms. sandpaper, different story. universities - long-term reforms. sandpaper, different story. universities are| different story. universities are facing new china cash crackdown. coming off the story that we have in

this paper —— same paper. this coming off the story that we have in this paper -- same paper. this story in the times talks _ this paper -- same paper. this story in the times talks about _ this paper -- same paper. this story in the times talks about changes - this paper -- same paper. this story in the times talks about changes to | in the times talks about changes to force universities to declare and say where investment has come from and if it has come from foreign actors, as they describe. i think it's £75,000 if the thresholds... if it's £75,000 if the thresholds... if it came from overseas. we've seen a number of stories over the past couple of years around investment. a lot of universities across the uk about where money comes from. how much influence are they having on universities and teaching. this is one way that the government seem to think they can help. it will also

get it would make it easier for investigations into where money's coming from, what exactly what this —— what exactly this money is being used for. it's all about making that much more transparent when money comes from certain places. siana, could you take us to the daily mirror? a report that boris johnson is snubbing a plea to extend free school meals.— johnson is snubbing a plea to extend free school meals. yes, as we spoken about earlier. — free school meals. yes, as we spoken about earlier, there _ free school meals. yes, as we spoken about earlier, there was _ free school meals. yes, as we spoken about earlier, there was this - about earlier, there was this national— about earlier, there was this national food strategy led by the man who — national food strategy led by the man who co—founded the lyon restaurant _ man who co—founded the lyon restaurant chain, and came up with a set of— restaurant chain, and came up with a set of recommendations and basically seems _ set of recommendations and basically seems like _ set of recommendations and basically seems like most of them, if not all,

not being _ seems like most of them, if not all, not being taken out by the government. it was a really big review— government. it was a really big review of— government. it was a really big review of this and a lot of recommendations, and yet it seems like boris _ recommendations, and yet it seems like borisjohnson isn't keen on implementing a lot of them. including the fact that henry wanted to include _ including the fact that henry wanted to include all children living in universal— to include all children living in universal credit household, so extending the school meals —— free school _ extending the school meals —— free school meals. and it seems that is not being — school meals. and it seems that is not being included. so, campaigners have been— not being included. so, campaigners have been generally disappointed about— have been generally disappointed about the government reaction. they were really— about the government reaction. they were really hoping for a new food bill, and — were really hoping for a new food bill, and the government said earlier— bill, and the government said earlier that wasn't going to happen. everything — earlier that wasn't going to happen. everything is well like sugar and salt tax. — everything is well like sugar and salt tax, very interventionist

approach _ salt tax, very interventionist approach that henry's review recommended. a lot of campaigners are disappointed.— recommended. a lot of campaigners are disappointed. we've got about 50 seconds. rachel, could you finish up with the daily express? this idea to change legislation to allow them to employ temporary workers during the plan strikes. this temporary workers during the plan strikes. �* . temporary workers during the plan strikes. �* , , ., , strikes. as we spoke about, this government _ strikes. as we spoke about, this government doesn't _ strikes. as we spoke about, this government doesn't have - strikes. as we spoke about, this government doesn't have its - government doesn't have its problems... and the transport secretary has raised this issue of changing legislation to allow companies that use agency workers to coverfor companies that use agency workers to cover for striking, companies that use agency workers to coverforstriking, but companies that use agency workers to cover for striking, but as the story says, this won't actually come, it would be further down the line. dealing with the issues that are presently impacting the railways, it

might not