' the 'the rain for tots chart shows how the rain for tots up, darker colours here, an inch or two of rain in the western isles. but it is here where the heat will peak at its greatest, by friday we could see temperatures widely 30-33 c, that is 91 in could see temperatures widely 30—33 c, that is 91 in fahrenheit. that is a few days away, it is fresh out there tonight, not so much across scotland and northern ireland for clear skies. we could see rain all day long again across the north and west of scotland, and in northern ireland the cloud will increase. away from that, the odd shower may crop up in the peak district as the cloud starts to creep, still some sunny spells, further south already 27 degrees in central london. most spots a degree orso central london. most spots a degree or so above average, and even with the cloud, pollen levels increase across scotland and northern ireland, highest for england and wales once again under this area of

high pressure which is dominating when the south and east, but low pressure never too far away, so again, on thursday, further spots of rain around, in south—west scotland later on. humidity levels are increasing, and you will certainly notice that by night. thursday night, friday morning, these are the temperatures by the end of the night, it will be tough to sleep, but if you do have clear skies, it is a full moon tonight, a big super moon out there, something to enjoy as you walk home. thanks, matt. and that is bbc news at ten on tuesday the 14th ofjune. there is more analysis of the day's main stories on news night with my colleague mark urban, that is just about getting under way on bbc two, and he will have more details for us when the cameras settle down on that aircraft that is meant to take off

from a wonder, that is meant to go tonight but is now probably going to go tomorrow. and of course, right across the uk, in the nations and regions, all of our colleagues standing by very smartly with the news where you are, but from the ten o'clock team, thanks for watching. hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are kate maltby, who's a columnist at the i newspaper, and the times radio presenter calum macdonald. good evening to you both, we will chat and just a second. let me run you through tomorrow's newspapers. the government's plan to send some asylum seekers to rwanda makes the lead in the i newspaper, which says it hasn't deterred people from crossing the channel.

the daily telegraph has that last—minute ruling from the european court of human rights, which casts doubt over the departure of that flight to kigali. and that same story about the strasbourg court's action is the lead in the guardian. we will also talk about the cricket that features there on the front page. the sun chooses to splash on a story about boxer tyson fury�*s return to the ring. the ft leads on "turmoil" in the world of virtual currencies, reporting on job cuts at coinbase. it's cutting a fifth of its workforce. so let's remind you of that news within the last hour related to that flight that was due to take—off a little earlier tonight — we understand that will not happen. that's because of rulings

that have meant there were originally seven asylum—seekers who were supposed to be on that plane, down from 50. we are told that a human rights appealfrom down from 50. we are told that a human rights appeal from the european court of human rights has meant that one of those was removed from the flight, which prompted legal appeals from the others who were on that plane, we were led to believe there were six remaining. now because of successful late—night petitions to the court of appeal in london, we understand that flight will now not take off. there is still quite a lot of merging about whether this is a final ruling or simply a stay, but nonetheless all cases are being blocked for removal. we will keep an eye on events there — we are looking at a live shot earlier of the plane still sat at the tarmac, there's still some activity on the plane that was due to take—off at 10:30pm — that is currently not happening but we'll keep you right up to date on any

further developments after a late—night appeal has stopped the flight from taking off to the rwandan capital of kigali. that story dominates the front pages, so let's jump story dominates the front pages, so let'sjump into story dominates the front pages, so let's jump into what's story dominates the front pages, so let'sjump into what's in story dominates the front pages, so let's jump into what's in those newspapers. good evening to you both, and it's the guardian that has our starting point, it's also on the front pages of many papers — let's look at the telegraph, "rwanda deportation blocked by european judges." callum, we might not be surprised originally there were supposed to be a0 on this flight, thenit supposed to be a0 on this flight, then it was down to eight, then seven, then six, no we are told no one will be on that flight tonight. it's been quite an embarrassing episode for the government. it has been embarrassing. _ episode for the government. it has been embarrassing. also, - episode for the government. it has been embarrassing. also, the - been embarrassing. also, the incremental way that this has happened, one by one, it would seem, those who were due for deportation

have been told they can stay. i think in the big picture of what this means to the telegraph, they've put a bit of detail on this — this is about not ruling on whether the policy itself is legal or illegal. rather, this is about waiting for a finaljudicial review to report back which we expect sometime injuly of that, and this ruling from the european courts to basically say we need to wait for that ruling before we can judge the policy. need to wait for that ruling before we canjudge the policy. and until that happens, these people should be allowed to stay. i think you're allowed to stay. i think you're allowed to stay. i think you're allowed to reflect on the embarrassing nature of it. there are also questions for the government to consider here in terms of what this means for the policy, what it means for the government still staying signed up to the court and the european convention on human rights— that something that borisjohnson that something that boris johnson was speaking about today, making the point that if the convention was

getting in the way of implementing government policy, that is something that he is open to reconsidering and reevaluating. that's where this potentially goes next, it's about perhaps even presenting this as a ruling from afar. it's worth noting it's not an eu court, and the way that plays out will be interesting to see, if it was a brexit related wedge issue which might be slightly unhelpful in terms of it being slightly misleading. it is a european court, not an eu court. but it'll be fascinating to understand the repercussions between now and thatjudicial review next month. find that 'udicial review next month. and it is thatjudicial review next month. and it is important _ thatjudicial review next month. and it is important to make that distinction. kate, the government already replacing the human rights act with a new bill of rights that it says will restrict claims to family life. but there is a certain irony that we've spent weeks reporting about not enough planes,

too many passengers causing chaos at the airports, and i we have a plane with passengers not going anywhere. it's not a very funny irony — but as callum _ it's not a very funny irony — but as callum was— it's not a very funny irony — but as callum was saying, we need to look at the _ callum was saying, we need to look at the politics of this thing, particularly the european politics of it _ particularly the european politics of it that — particularly the european politics of it. that telegraph headline, "rwanda — of it. that telegraph headline, "rwanda deportation of it. that telegraph headline, " rwanda deportation blocked of it. that telegraph headline, "rwanda deportation blocked by europeanjudges" — it is technically out of— europeanjudges" — it is technically out of date — europeanjudges" — it is technically out of date because almost all the papers _ out of date because almost all the papers that have splashed on this were _ papers that have splashed on this were reporting before the latest news _ were reporting before the latest news that you've just reported to your viewers, which seems to be that the flight _ your viewers, which seems to be that the flight won't take off at all. as callum _ the flight won't take off at all. as callum was explaining, although triggered in part by a european court _ triggered in part by a european court of— triggered in part by a european court of human rights, the final blow_ court of human rights, the final blow was— court of human rights, the final blow was struck in london at the court _ blow was struck in london at the court of— blow was struck in london at the court of appeal, a british court. but that— court of appeal, a british court. but that headline, "rwanda deportation blocked by european

judges," — deportation blocked by european judges," to a certain extent boris johnson — judges," to a certain extent boris johnson getting that headline out of the tory— johnson getting that headline out of the tory faithful, the readers of the telegraph is the most important win for— the telegraph is the most important win for him — the telegraph is the most important win for him politically. because as your political editor was talking about _ your political editor was talking about earlier, this is a wedge issue - they— about earlier, this is a wedge issue - they are — about earlier, this is a wedge issue — they are more opinion polls tonight— — they are more opinion polls tonight insisting this is something where _ tonight insisting this is something where the tory base, broadly speaking, is quite in favour of this proposat — speaking, is quite in favour of this proposal. there's also a lot of scepticism perhaps from left—leaning voters _ scepticism perhaps from left—leaning voters but _ scepticism perhaps from left—leaning voters. but what does the conservative government do whenever it's in— conservative government do whenever it's in trouble? it picks a fight on europe and — it's in trouble? it picks a fight on europe and it picks a fight on immigration. this is exactly what we've _ immigration. this is exactly what we've seeri— immigration. this is exactly what we've seen perfectly. i would of course — we've seen perfectly. i would of course say _ we've seen perfectly. i would of course say it's still a huge issue for the — course say it's still a huge issue for the government, course say it's still a huge issue forthe government, i'm course say it's still a huge issue for the government, i'm sure they would _ for the government, i'm sure they would have — for the government, i'm sure they would have preferred that plane to take off _ would have preferred that plane to take off tonight not least because liz truss — take off tonight not least because liz truss was sent out this morning to the _ liz truss was sent out this morning to the media saying, "this flight

will absolutely take off, " to the media saying, "this flight will absolutely take off," and it's important — will absolutely take off," and it's important to assert the principle that our— important to assert the principle that our policy is legal and going ahead, _ that our policy is legal and going ahead, and the lefties can't stop it." ahead, and the lefties can't stop it" there — ahead, and the lefties can't stop it." there will be an element of humiliation, and i was reminded just now, _ humiliation, and i was reminded just now, listening to your report, back in 2012, _ now, listening to your report, back in 2012, not— now, listening to your report, back in 2012, not everyone may or member this lrut— in 2012, not everyone may or member this but theresa may, the home secretary— this but theresa may, the home secretary then, invested a huge amount— secretary then, invested a huge amount of— secretary then, invested a huge amount of capital in ensuring the deportation of abba himes, the extremist islamist cleric. she and her special— extremist islamist cleric. she and her special advisers stayed up all night _ her special advisers stayed up all night to— her special advisers stayed up all night to ensure that they were aware of any last—minute legal challenges - and _ of any last—minute legal challenges - and there — of any last—minute legal challenges — and there were last—minute legal challenges — — and there were last—minute legal challenges and it was all brought at about— challenges and it was all brought at about 3am, but they did get that flight _ about 3am, but they did get that flight out — about 3am, but they did get that flight out and i think the deportation was a important moment in theresa _ deportation was a important moment in theresa may's political career, asserting — in theresa may's political career, asserting she could not only be tough — asserting she could not only be tough on — asserting she could not only be tough on immigration but achieve her objectives _ tough on immigration but achieve her objectives legally. so maybe a split

political _ objectives legally. so maybe a split political consequence for boris johnson — political consequence for boris johnson and priti patel, and everyone else invested in this policy~ — everyone else invested in this policy. they'll be delighted to see headlines about european judges blocking — headlines about european judges blocking the good old will of the british _ blocking the good old will of the british people — that rallies their base _ british people — that rallies their base 0h — british people — that rallies their base. 0n the other hand, what even anti—immigration and people who believe _ anti—immigration and people who believe in — anti—immigration and people who believe in this policy want is a government that can deliver a. that sto is government that can deliver a. that story is still— government that can deliver a. trust story is still developing and we will keep an eye on whether we hear more details over the course of this evening. let's turn our attention to some of the other stories — also on the front page of the telegraph is nicola sturgeon's plea for another scottish recommend democrat referendum. a suggestion that she should wait until 2039 —— another scottish independence referendum. that came from mark spencer, saying there should be a 25 year gap from

there should be a 25 year gap from the 201a first independence referendum to them when there is the chance to hold a second one. on this, i mean, nicola sturgeon and snp have been elected absolutely fully upfront saying they will go for a second independence referendum. so we are at the stage where this is to be expected. this is not surprising, whether you like it or not, that's the mandate on which they were elected. so she's ramping it up and going for it. i think what this is at risk of feeling like it is history repeating itself, and if they are not fresh arguments and fresh efforts to convince either side, from nicola sturgeon and the snp and unionists, whether that be borisjohnson or the unionist parties in scotland, ie those labour and conservative msps who want to see scotland stay part of the uk, if there is not some sort of the uk, if there is not some sort of fresh energy, then it will all just feel like the difficult second album of a rock band where everything isjust album of a rock band where everything is just a album of a rock band where everything isjust a little bit

difficult to create any impact because we've been there and done that once before. so i think the mandate is there, it's difficult to argue against it. in terms of the information presented, it has to be detailed. the 201a referendum was noticeable in so many ways — the scottish government at the time used a huge white paper, but it still left gaps in the interim so much as changed, it's difficult to predict, as well. that's part of this. i'll also add that there are other things to be considered by nicola sturgeon — today for example, she hinted that there would have to be some element of border checks between scotland and england, and what we have now is and england, and what we have now is a real—life example that happened with the northern ireland protocol. so i think voters can look at these things, so much as changed and there's so much information new

democrat there. we have to keep the information sithole, that's what should be different from the 201a referendum campaign — but there's a lot for voters to consider —— keep the conversation civil. lot for voters to consider -- keep the conversation civil.— the conversation civil. 2014, is very divisive. _ the conversation civil. 2014, is very divisive, how _ the conversation civil. 2014, is very divisive, how often - the conversation civil. 2014, is very divisive, how often can i the conversation civil. 2014, is. very divisive, how often can you keep having a vote? the prime minister says it was only a few years ago, and nicola sturgeon should respect that.— years ago, and nicola sturgeon should respect that. yes, i think that that was _ should respect that. yes, i think that that was very _ should respect that. yes, i think that that was very divisive - should respect that. yes, i think that that was very divisive not i should respect that. yes, i think i that that was very divisive not only in scotland. — that that was very divisive not only in scotland, but in terms of england waking _ in scotland, but in terms of england waking up _ in scotland, but in terms of england waking up and recognising its strength— waking up and recognising its strength of feeling in scotland. and maybe _ strength of feeling in scotland. and maybe that affects the views of a lot of— maybe that affects the views of a lot of english people about their relationship with their scottish neighbours. but i would take issue with callum's assertion that there definitely— with callum's assertion that there definitely is a mandate for this vote _ definitely is a mandate for this vote on— definitely is a mandate for this vote on the basis of the snp 's showing — vote on the basis of the snp 's showing in—

vote on the basis of the snp 's showing in scotland. electorally on the base _ showing in scotland. electorally on the base of competency, sturgeon has thrived. _ the base of competency, sturgeon has thrived. but— the base of competency, sturgeon has thrived, but also a monarch hegemony. there was a much more extreme _ hegemony. there was a much more extreme nationalist, separatist option— extreme nationalist, separatist option on— extreme nationalist, separatist option on the bill last time which was alex — option on the bill last time which was alex sam and's controversial splinter— was alex sam and's controversial splinter group. —— alex salmon. polls _ splinter group. —— alex salmon. polls show— splinter group. —— alex salmon. polls show consistently that snp voters _ polls show consistently that snp voters like nicola sturgeon because they voters like nicola sturgeon because thev think— voters like nicola sturgeon because they think she can run the country efficiently. — they think she can run the country efficiently, they like or economic policies. — efficiently, they like or economic policies. they are broadly nationalist often, yes, but it's a stretch— nationalist often, yes, but it's a stretch to — nationalist often, yes, but it's a stretch to say you can pin the success — stretch to say you can pin the success of— stretch to say you can pin the success of the snp in recent years when _ success of the snp in recent years when it— success of the snp in recent years when it comes to scottish parliamentary elections directly that you — parliamentary elections directly that you can't convert that absolutely into a vote to acquit the union. _ absolutely into a vote to acquit the union. l _ absolutely into a vote to acquit the union. . . . absolutely into a vote to acquit the union. ., , ., ., _ union. i was 'ust going to say, i think the union. i wasjust going to say, i think the point _ union. i wasjust going to say, i think the point is _ union. i wasjust going to say, i think the point is that - union. i wasjust going to say, i | think the point is that they were

very upfront in their manifesto commitments that a second referendum