this is bbc news. the headlines... several russian cruise missiles have struck the ukrainian capital, kyiv, causing large explosions. the attacks come as world leaders meet in germany where they'll discuss how to support ukraine. among the leaders at the summit is borisjohnson who has said he is "actively thinking" about a third term, amid criticism of his leadership. each donald trump applauds the supreme court ruling on abortion — calling it a victory for life itself.

timeframe look at the sport. let's start with cricket — where we're just over an hour away from the start of play on day four of the third and final test against new zealand at headingley — and momentum looks to have swung back in england's favour. the hosts finished with a first innings lead thanks to another stunning performance from jonny bairstow who made 162. new zealand started their second innings brightly, opener tom latham reached half century before being caught for 76, and that was the start of their batting collapse as four more fell, henry nicholls the last to go, so new zealand will resume 168 forfive. we didn't have the best of sessions in the middle session, new zealand took that one, we just wanted to come out with positive vibes that we came up with whenjamie started batting, and we decided to go out with positive intent and look to change the game on its head, we got three wickets in that short

space of time and hopefully put them under pressure overnight. emma raducanu says she is "ready to go" ahead of the start of wimbledon tomorrow. raducanu burst onto the scene and reached the fourth round at last year's championships before stunning the world by winning the us open in september. the brit has been plagued by injuries recently but practiced at wimbledon on friday as scheduled. she will make her centre court debut when she plays belgium's alison van uytvanck tomorrow. it is the most special place to be playing tennis, and itjust a very inspiring and motivating place to be, and definitely looking politics tipping out of court on monday, and ready to go. ahead of the world athletics championships in oregon next month, there was a shock loss for dina asher smith at the british championships, as darryl neita took victory in the final of the women's 100 metres in manchester in a wind assisted time of 10.8 seconds.

asher—smith finished second. the pair were part of the 4x100 metre relay team who won bronze at last year's tokyo olympics. and a new name to look out for in a busy summer of athletics, which will also include the commonwealths and europeans, will bejeremiah azu — he suprised the favourites in the men's 100m to win in 9.9 seconds, beating reece prescod and zharnel hughes. there were two gold medals for great britain in the latest round of the world triathlon championship series. georgia taylor—brown won the women's event in montreal, and now leads the overall standings, having come second in the previous round in leeds. she finished ahead of france's cassandre beaugrand. team—mate beth potter was third, to win her first medal in the series. and in the men's event, alex yee, the olympic gold and silver medallist, sprinted home ahead of new zealand's hayden wilde and frenchman leo bergere to take the gold medal.

there was a bronze medal for great britain on the final day of world swimming championships, and it came in the men's 4x100—metre individual medley relay. tom dean anchored the relay team home to clinch his third bronze of the week — and bring the the medal tally for gb to five for the championships. italy claimed gold, their first in a relay event. south korea's in—gee chun continues to lead the women's pga championship in maryland on eight under par. but after starting her round six shots clear, she now only leads by three, as she chases a first major title in six years. northern ireland's stephanie meadow is tied tenth on two under par. but there's been more disappointment for rory mcilroy — after the third round of the travelers championship, he's slipped back to 31st place. after sharing the lead on the first day and falling away on the second,

a two—over—par round of 72 means he's now 11 shots behind leader xander scheuffele going into the final round. scotland's martin laird is fifth. that's all the sport for now. now on bbc news, here's the papers. hello and welcome to our look at what the the papers are saying today. with me are benjamin butterworth, late editor and senior reporter at the i, and anne mcelvoy, senior editor of the economist. the observer leads on reaction to comments by borisjohnson that he's planning for a third term, with senior conservatives apparently

calling him �*delusional�*. according to the telegraph, the prime minister is planning to impose sweeping new steel tariffs as he tries to win back support in red wall seats. but the paper says he could be accused of breaking international law. the sunday mirror reports on a high court ruling that government plans to house asylum—seekers were unlawful. the sunday times has further allegations about prince charles by the paper's investigations team, which we're going to talk to about in much more detail in a moment. �*crackdown on militant unions�* is the lead for the express — with suggestions that the prime minister is being urged by the attorney general not to give an inch to striking rail staff. so let's begin. let's start with this exclusive story in the sunday times, quite extraordinary, prince charles

accepting, they say, 1 million euros in cash in a suitcase from a former qatari politician.— qatari politician. they used a . uali qatari politician. they used a quality marmalade _ qatari politician. they used a quality marmalade dropper, l qatari politician. they used a | quality marmalade dropper, a qatari politician. they used a - quality marmalade dropper, a story that would make you drop your marmalade if you are having a late breakfast. obviously these allegations, we have to be clear about that, and this happened a number of times, according to the paper. there are two issues here. what was going on there, it appears that the former prime minister of qatar is making donations to the charitable fund that prince charles runs but some of which goes to the upkeep of his scottish residence, so it is charitable for project and for the upkeep of his own house and residence, and that is already, the way that that scottish property has been handled, questions being asked by the sunday times and others about that, this is embarrassing on that score, but the other point is

really, if this is not disclosed and there are sensitivities around the source of the money, as there were in this case, and in the case of this particular shape, if that wasn't open to being discussed and examined, it does look like that was something that needs to be addressed because he is the air to the throne, not some reprobate fat up member of the royalfamily, it looks like he has questions to answer about his judgment. == has questions to answer about his 'ud . ment. . has questions to answer about his 'udument. . , , has questions to answer about his 'udument. . , judgment. -- far up. the paper says there are no — judgment. -- far up. the paper says there are no suggestions _ judgment. -- far up. the paper says there are no suggestions of - there are no suggestions of illegality, benjamin, what are clarence house saying about this? they gave a statement in the newspaper. it they gave a statement in the newsnaper-— they gave a statement in the news-a 'el'. , . ., , ., newspaper. it is clear they have questions _ newspaper. it is clear they have questions to — newspaper. it is clear they have questions to answer, _ newspaper. it is clear they have questions to answer, because l newspaper. it is clear they have questions to answer, because it raises _ questions to answer, because it raises such— questions to answer, because it raises such questions about his judgment, these were in fortnum & mason _ judgment, these were in fortnum & mason bags with 500 euros notes, which _ mason bags with 500 euros notes, which the — mason bags with 500 euros notes, which the sunday times mentions, in the past _ which the sunday times mentions, in the past it— which the sunday times mentions, in the past it has been associated with terrorism _ the past it has been associated with terrorism because it is a discontinued note, they were handed in suitcases, you have to wonder

what _ in suitcases, you have to wonder what makes prince charles think this was acceptable. there are so many questions — was acceptable. there are so many questions about him getting involved in politics. _ questions about him getting involved in politics, expressing his views, and accepting cash in this form will raise _ and accepting cash in this form will raise a _ and accepting cash in this form will raise a lot — and accepting cash in this form will raise a lot of questions about whether— raise a lot of questions about whether he can do the role as monarch— whether he can do the role as monarch on the world stage. because ac having _ monarch on the world stage. because ac having preference for a country like qatar— ac having preference for a country like qatar when he is being funded by their— like qatar when he is being funded by their former prime minister? ce by their former prime minister? (ce in by their former prime minister? in cheshire, by their former prime minister? ce in cheshire, the chairman of the princes foundation, says that at if you hours notice, they have checked into this event in the past and confirmed that the previous trustees of the foundation discussed the governance and donor relationship, confirming that the doughnut was a legitimate and verified counterparty, and our auditors sign off after a specific inquiry during the audit —— confirming that the donor. there was no failure of governance. you just mentioned some of the details the paper is

alleging, some of the cash was in fortnum & mason bags, it talks about some of his aides counting through this cash, adding it up. yes. some of his aides counting through this cash, adding it up.— this cash, adding it up. yes, they sa the this cash, adding it up. yes, they say the source — this cash, adding it up. yes, they say the source of _ this cash, adding it up. yes, they say the source of the _ this cash, adding it up. yes, they say the source of the story - this cash, adding it up. yes, they say the source of the story says, | say the source of the story says, there was discomfort, i understand it is a technical statement saying they didn't break the law but that is not really the question, we don't expect the air telephone to be in danger of being seen to break the law, it is about optics and judgment, and it is also about transparency. we have been through this with party funding and there are still darker areas, we have got to a point where we know what questions to ask to find out where money is coming from. it such a lot of money can be transferred in such an uncommon way to the air telephone, a lot of people would say this is a failure of transparency. —— air to the throne. it is not about laws or rules being broken, i suppose they argument would be as

long as they can verify the source, the former prime minister of qatar is entitled to give it to who he wants, but it is the recipient and we are worried about. i do think when it comes to prince charles�*s own affairs, the way that he handles them, i think you see slight blindness in the way it will come across. if you think about it, the queen got to the very lengthy reign, still in it without any questions of this kind being raised to is not in a job yet and i think that is the worry that questions will be asked about his antenna being sharp enough here, to the perception that he might have favourites and most countries, which of course he cannot have. �* , ., ., ., have. let's turn to the front of the observer. — have. let's turn to the front of the observer. the _ have. let's turn to the front of the observer, the prime _ have. let's turn to the front of the observer, the prime minister's - have. let's turn to the front of the l observer, the prime minister's plan for a third term in power. some senior conservatives telling the

observer that boris johnson senior conservatives telling the observer that borisjohnson is increasingly delusional. observer that boris johnson is increasingly delusional.- increasingly delusional. yes, obviously — increasingly delusional. yes, obviously he _ increasingly delusional. yes, obviously he lost _ increasingly delusional. yes, obviously he lost out - increasingly delusional. yes, obviously he lost out two - increasingly delusional. yes, obviously he lost out two bigj obviously he lost out two big by—elections on thursday in tiverton and wakefield, and he lost them remarkably badly, 30% swing in the devon _ remarkably badly, 30% swing in the devon constituency. yet he went forward — devon constituency. yet he went forward and said he is going to be in power— forward and said he is going to be in power into the 20 30s, which at the very— in power into the 20 30s, which at the very least, if you think prince charies— the very least, if you think prince charles might be tone deaf, boris johnson _ charles might be tone deaf, boris johnson is — charles might be tone deaf, boris johnson is trying to outdo him this morninq — johnson is trying to outdo him this morning. some of his own backbenchers have said that is delusional, the prime minister says he is _ delusional, the prime minister says he is embarking on a massive project to change _ he is embarking on a massive project to change the country legally and constitutionally. i think a lot of people — constitutionally. i think a lot of people are asking, he cannot seem to change _ people are asking, he cannot seem to change basic things about himself in the job, _ change basic things about himself in thejob, not change basic things about himself in the job, not sure how effective he can be _ the job, not sure how effective he can be a _ the job, not sure how effective he can be a change in the country. it raises _ can be a change in the country. it raises a _ can be a change in the country. it raises a lot— can be a change in the country. it raises a lot of questions about whether— raises a lot of questions about whether this is some kind of distraction technique to get away from _ distraction technique to get away from the — distraction technique to get away from the idea that he will not be on the job— from the idea that he will not be on the job intended is time, let alone ten years — the job intended is time, let alone ten years i— the job intended is time, let alone ten years. i think it also rated

questions _ ten years. i think it also rated questions about his judgment, because — questions about his judgment, because lots of backbenchers are looking _ because lots of backbenchers are looking at — because lots of backbenchers are looking at their constituencies, seeing — looking at their constituencies, seeing a — looking at their constituencies, seeing a seat like wakefield, it was a marginal— seeing a seat like wakefield, it was a marginal seat contrary to what people _ a marginal seat contrary to what people might assume, it had a tiny majority_ people might assume, it had a tiny majority for — people might assume, it had a tiny majority for the winning party at six elections in a row, they lost it badly _ six elections in a row, they lost it badly you — six elections in a row, they lost it badly. you will have a lot of these red wall — badly. you will have a lot of these red wall tories that will look at their— red wall tories that will look at their seats and wonder if they can keep— their seats and wonder if they can keep it _ their seats and wonder if they can keep it. when he won the confidence vote only— keep it. when he won the confidence vote only a _ keep it. when he won the confidence vote only a month or so ago, he won it with _ vote only a month or so ago, he won it with lots _ vote only a month or so ago, he won it with lots of — vote only a month or so ago, he won it with lots of them saying he is a winner— it with lots of them saying he is a winner and — it with lots of them saying he is a winner and i it with lots of them saying he is a winnerand i think it with lots of them saying he is a winner and i think right now that is under— winner and i think right now that is under serious question so maybe him saying _ under serious question so maybe him saying he _ under serious question so maybe him saying he will do a third term as pm is some _ saying he will do a third term as pm is some kind of technique to convince _ is some kind of technique to convince people he has still got it. i convince people he has still got it. i wonder. — convince people he has still got it. i wonder. if— convince people he has still got it. i wonder, if you are the pm and you asked about reporters without you would like to serve a full second term, there is nothing else you can say yes, of course, and even thinking about a third, it is like asking the england manager if they will win the game, there is only one

answer. ., ., ., ., answer. you are on to something, particularly _ answer. you are on to something, particularly with — answer. you are on to something, particularly with boris _ answer. you are on to something, particularly with boris johnson, i answer. you are on to something, particularly with boris johnson, he particularly with borisjohnson, he has had a bloody know this week, has a divided party, he has quite a sizeable chunk of his party who would like to see him move on as well as those who opposed him over brexit. there is a side boris johnson that sees his match tactics as to double down, and when he says he will go on and on, as thatcher said, which didn't work out either, but she did have a long run, is that he is bearing his party to come and get him. i do understand it, there is a side borisjohnson that x people, but if he steps back and says he will go away and changes course, let me see what i can do to help you, customer services on the line, i think he doesn't see his role that way and he is saying, i intend to stay, i am the best person to bring you a victory, if you have

someone else, let them step up. that is really what he is saying. lltrul’itly is really what he is saying. with our is really what he is saying. with your contacts. _ is really what he is saying. with your contacts, i _ is really what he is saying. with your contacts, i wonder - is really what he is saying. with your contacts, i wonder what might unfold over the next six months or so. go on, what are you hearing? i just spent a lot of time yesterday talking to people, various wings of the party, at what comes across is, even amongst those previously supportive of borisjohnson, the sort of people who thought he would take the party forward, they are disappointed to be in these doldrums. they think it is hard, harder than people think to get to the second confidence vote, but where there is a well, there is a way, and a sizeable number as they are, they will do it. i didn't find any agreement about, not even who should succeed him, but who would be the two candidates from two different wings of the party, people like liz truss looking very poised and confident, not making mistakes,

careful what they say, they know that the spotlight will turn to them, but it is hard without at least a frontrunner. you havejeremy hunt but that is kind of harvey leadership, people think, so let's see what happens, canjohnson steadied the ship —— half a leadership? he is very far from safe harbour on this one. if leadership? he is very far from safe harbour on this one.— harbour on this one. if we look inside the _ harbour on this one. if we look inside the sun _ harbour on this one. if we look inside the sun on _ harbour on this one. if we look inside the sun on sunday, - harbour on this one. if we look| inside the sun on sunday, their headliners, boris, iwill inside the sun on sunday, their headliners, boris, i will be pm until 2030, then they have rebels, you will be out in weeks. i until 2030, then they have rebels, you will be out in weeks.— you will be out in weeks. i think that was one — you will be out in weeks. i think that was one of _ you will be out in weeks. i think that was one of an's _ you will be out in weeks. i think that was one of an's stories, . you will be out in weeks. i think| that was one of an's stories, this will be _ that was one of an's stories, this will be the — that was one of an's stories, this will be the factor that if you look back— will be the factor that if you look back at _ will be the factor that if you look back at the previous people, previous— back at the previous people, previous prime minister faced confidence votes and supplied by a greater— confidence votes and supplied by a greater margin than the current pm, they were _ greater margin than the current pm, they were all gone not long after, that is— they were all gone not long after, that is the — they were all gone not long after, that is the territory that boris johnson — that is the territory that boris johnson finds himself in because a lot of— johnson finds himself in because a lot of mps— johnson finds himself in because a lot of mps will now be saying, lysine — lot of mps will now be saying, lysine would be lost under anything like the _ lysine would be lost under anything like the results we saw this week ——

my seat— like the results we saw this week —— my seat would be lost. i don't think boris _ my seat would be lost. i don't think borisjohnson is likely my seat would be lost. i don't think boris johnson is likely to come and -- succumb — boris johnson is likely to come and —— succumb to the pressure of mps who cannot — —— succumb to the pressure of mps who cannot force him out, because he has shown— who cannot force him out, because he has shown time and again that he doesn't _ has shown time and again that he doesn't follow the usual rules of politics — doesn't follow the usual rules of politics for better or worse. sunday telea-rah, politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph. not _ politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure _ politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure who _ politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure who was - politics for better or worse. sunday telegraph, not sure who was told l politics for better or worse. sunday| telegraph, not sure who was told to lead off on this, but who want to talk about the steel tariffs? that was me. talk about the steel tariffs? that was me- the _ talk about the steel tariffs? that was me. the prime _ talk about the steel tariffs? that was me. the prime minister wants to introduce _ was me. the prime minister wants to introduce new tariffs on steel which ithink— introduce new tariffs on steel which i think will— introduce new tariffs on steel which i think will go on developing countries and china, and the suggestion is that this will be will -- breach— suggestion is that this will be will —— breach world trade organization rules _ —— breach world trade organization rules a— —— breach world trade organization rules. a backbencher has said it would _ rules. a backbencher has said it would screw the economy, he is going to screw— would screw the economy, he is going to screw the _ would screw the economy, he is going to screw the economy, because the fear is _ to screw the economy, because the fear is you — to screw the economy, because the fear is you can get into a trade war and then— fear is you can get into a trade war and then you — fear is you can get into a trade war and then you could have tarus put back on— and then you could have tarus put back on things like whiskey, one of

the things— back on things like whiskey, one of the things the sunday telegraph is suggesting —— tariffs put on. johnson _ suggesting —— tariffs put on. johnson is _ suggesting —— tariffs put on. johnson is good at picking battles and they— johnson is good at picking battles and they usually seem effective but this is— and they usually seem effective but this is not— and they usually seem effective but this is not the time to be taking risks— this is not the time to be taking risks with — this is not the time to be taking risks with the economy when you can have tarus— risks with the economy when you can have tarus put on the other way. —— tariffs _ have tarus put on the other way. —— tariffs put _ have tarus put on the other way. —— tariffs put on — have tarus put on the other way. -- tariffs put on-_ tariffs put on. sunday mirror, re tariffs put on. sunday mirror, pretty breaks _ tariffs put on. sunday mirror, pretty breaks law— tariffs put on. sunday mirror, pretty breaks law and - tariffs put on. sunday mirror, | pretty breaks law and another tariffs put on. sunday mirror, - pretty breaks law and another asylum scandal —— priti patel breaks law yet, let me turn to that. priti patel has broken the law again, says the mirror, over her treatment of asylum seekers, the high court ruled that housing refugees in shoddy barracks in kent until 2026 was in breach of the equality act, it comes as a rwanda scheme faces ongoing legal issues, more details inside.

this is quite a long running story, a rumbling discontent about the way that asylum seekers are housed at how the processing that they undergo, some of that is on the port around this part of the country, what happens then and what is their entitlement and what is the level of entitlement, there are a lot of checks and balances, a lot of independent advisers and monitors who look at this, and in this has been raised a number of times with the government. the government's case previously was that if it was temporary accommodation and people were being dispersed around the country and moved on fast, there was a sort of basic flow to the level of accommodation, quite often that doesn't happen or gets delayed and the equalities act comes into play. it is another question for pity patel to answer, and underlying it —— priti patel, the system isn't working at, that is why she has gone

for this dramatic rwanda settlement policy and to try to stem the numbers coming across the channel. the question will be a she crossing the line to the way of dealing with this asylum seekers which is unfair? the numbers hoop the government in a poor light —— put the government. trying to get the balance right on the numbers that you feel you can accommodate but not falling off a treat getting mixed up with your general immigration policy, that has tested home secretaries over the years, priti patel has a robust response, not of a body likes it. who wants to talk about prince charles but a slightly different subject, he wants the slave trade port and understood as widely as the holocaust? —— taught and understood. interesting idea, prince charles has said we _

interesting idea, prince charles has said we should have something like the holocaust memorial day trust, the holocaust memorial day trust, the charity— the holocaust memorial day trust, the charity that does so much work in schools — the charity that does so much work in schools across the country, takes two pupils _ in schools across the country, takes two pupils of each school to visit auschwitz — two pupils of each school to visit auschwitz each year as they history course, _ auschwitz each year as they history course, and — auschwitz each year as they history course, and prince charles are saying — course, and prince charles are saying we _ course, and prince charles are saying we shouldn't have a similar organisation that highlight what happens —— should have. what happens with slavery _ happens —— should have. what happens with slavery. he says there isn't enough — with slavery. he says there isn't enough awareness and in the depth of understanding of the slave trade, that there — understanding of the slave trade, that there ought to be, and it ought to be _ that there ought to be, and it ought to be known on a thames like the holocaust — to be known on a thames like the holocaust is. they are keen to say he isn't _ holocaust is. they are keen to say he isn't wishing to tell the education secretary what they should be doing _ education secretary what they should be doing and what should be in the education — be doing and what should be in the education system but i think this is prince _ education system but i think this is prince charles asking someone out there. _ prince charles asking someone out there, someone that can pull this together— there, someone that can pull this together to create such a charity because — together to create such a charity because it — together to create such a charity because it wants to be a patron of it. because it wants to be a patron of it it _ because it wants to be a patron of it it comes— because it wants to be a patron of it. it comes off the back of comments he made in rwanda about why we need _ comments he made in rwanda about why we need to— comments he made in rwanda about why we need to be aware of the consequences of the slave trade. he has been _ consequences of the slave trade. he has been making these quite a few

times— has been making these quite a few times and — has been making these quite a few times and i— has been making these quite a few times and i think it is probably the film times and i think it is probably the right thing — times and i think it is probably the right thing for the air to the throne _ right thing for the air to the throne to— right thing for the air to the throne to do, he is doing a lot of things— throne to do, he is doing a lot of things that — throne to do, he is doing a lot of things that are at the wrong things, but to— things that are at the wrong things, but to be _ things that are at the wrong things, but to be talking about britain's legacy — but to be talking about britain's legacy and recognising the problems of the _ legacy and recognising the problems of the slave trade, it is a wise place — of the slave trade, it is a wise place to— of the slave trade, it is a wise place to put himself, not least because — place to put himself, not least because the public feel differently and more aware of these things than they did _ and more aware of these things than they did in _ and more aware of these things than they did in the past, but also if there's— they did in the past, but also if there's any hope of keeping the commonwealth countries together, it is clear— commonwealth countries together, it is clear from nations like barbados, which _ is clear from nations like barbados, which has _ is clear from nations like barbados, which has already left, jamaica, which is looking to leave, they feel very sensitive about these issues and they— very sensitive about these issues and they expect the monarch to be understanding and thinking about the consequences for britain's colonial past~ _ consequences for britain's colonial ast. ~ consequences for britain's colonial ast, . . , ., consequences for britain's colonial past-_ sorry. - consequences for britain's colonial past-_ sorry. go i consequences for britain's colonial| past-_ sorry. go on- past. we celebrate... sorry, go on. it is an interesting _ past. we celebrate... sorry, go on. it is an interesting shift _ past. we celebrate... sorry, go on. it is an interesting shift at - past. we celebrate... sorry, go on. it is an interesting shift at the - it is an interesting shift at the royal family, it is an interesting shift at the royalfamily, i would it is an interesting shift at the royalfamily, iwould put it is an interesting shift at the royalfamily, i would put alongside prince william being around for his 40th birthday, highlighting homelessness, they have to be quite careful and not seen to be setting a political agenda in as much as a lot

of people will say this is a good idea, if you many things, on one side of the political balance sheet, you can get difficult for the royals, but we are seeing both of them, charles and william, configure their rules together, they now work more closely together, you can see nudges to the system that they are trying to bring in. of course, somebody else has to take it forward, they have to be careful that they do not do too many things at once, which they seem to be calling for things to be set up which someone else has to set off and do, some people might say that is a bit royal, they don't have to do the work to set up. the commonwealth is coming into the reckoning with the post—colonial legacy and prince charles are taking that particular bull by the horns. we have just under a that particular bull by the horns. we havejust under a minute that particular bull by the horns. we have just under a minute to celebrate support mccartney and dave grohl and bruce springsteen —— paul mccartney. talk about magical. it

was. a mccartney. talk about magical. it was- a fair _ mccartney. talk about magical. it was. a fair few _ mccartney. talk about magical. it was. a fair few years _ mccartney. talk about magical. it was. a fair few years between - mccartney. talk about magical. it. was. a fair few years between them, what can we — was. a fair few years between them, what can we say _ was. a fair few years between them, what can we say except _ was. a fair few years between them, what can we say except keep - was. a fair few years between them, what can we say except keep on - what can we say except keep on rocking? what can we say except keep on rockin: ? . , ~:: what can we say except keep on rockin:? . , ~:: , ., , what can we say except keep on rockim? . ,

hello, everyone. i hope you're doing all right. well, we had a plentiful supply of heavy, blustery showers yesterday and more of that to come for many of us today. but we are seeing some brightness, so it's not a complete write off as far as the unsettled weather is concerned. and the reason we're seeing this is down to what we're having here on the pressure chart, an area of low pressure. this is nearby, it's not really going anywhere in a hurry. you can see the winds swirling around it here and the winds are introducing those heavy, blustery downpours. so showery spells of rain moving in from western parts. you can see the weather frontier trailing from parts of scotland, northern ireland to the northwest of england, western parts of wales, eventually creeping into the south west of england as well. there is a bit of an east—west split today, however, the further east you go, the drier it is and the warmer it is. top temperatures 23 celsius across southeastern parts of england, whereas parts of wales, northern ireland in particular cooler. and we'll have those heavy downpours as i mentioned. now, i've spoken about the winds already thanks to the presence of that low pressure.

these are the wind gusts in excess of a0 to 50 miles per hour across the isle of man, parts of anglesey, western coastal fringes, for example. yes, it will be breezy or blustery further east, but not quite as windy here. how is it looking at glastonbury? well, it will be quite windy at times, i think, with some heavy showers, but it will brighten up and i think we will see some sunshine at times. let's head through this evening, then. the weather front is very slowly creeping across towards the east, introducing those heavy downpours with it. again, we could hear the odd rumble of thunder, i think eastern parts of england remaining dry, but we can't rule out the odd shower here as well. top temperatures reaching 11 or 12 celsius as far as our lows are concerned tonight. now, the low pressure i was speaking of earlier is moving away towards the north, but we are shortly going to be joined by another low. this is creeping in from the west as we head through the next 2a hours or so. so monday starts off dry for many of us. we still have those heavy downpours.

however, they're moving across towards the east. here's the low pressure introducing that weather front into parts of northern ireland. another windy one, i think. these are the average wind speeds, but gusts in excess of what we're seeing there. and at top, temperatures quite similar about 22 or 23 celsius, fairly unsettled at times this week, i think, thanks to the low pressure. but temperatures will rise a bit for a time. we'll keep you posted. see you soon.

course this is bbc news broadcasting in the uk and around the globe. i'm victoria derbyshire. our top stories... several russian cruise missiles have struck the ukrainian capital, kyiv, causing large explosions. the attacks come as world leaders meet in germany where they'll discuss how to support ukraine. among the leaders at the summit

is borisjohnson who has said