this is bbc news. we'll have the headlines and all the main news stories for you at the top of the hour as newsday continues, straight after hardtalk. welcome to hardtalk, i'm stephen sackur. russia's war on ukraine has turned culture into a battleground in countries supportive of ukraine's resistance to putin's invasion, some russian artists, musicians and dancers have been stripped of their platforms or they've been asked

to denounce russia's military aggression. when does solidarity turn into censorship? my guest is the world renowned soviet—born conductor semyon bychkov. is art the loser when politics takes centre stage? semyon bychkovjoins me now, welcome to hardtalk. thank you. you are like all of the great musical maestros, you're peripatetic, your career takes you all around the world, you are constantly travelling. is there one place you can

point to and say that has done the most to define you as a person and an artist? no, i don't think so, maybe because my destiny made it so that i was born in russia. i lived there 22 years before emigrating to america. leningrad was a city, when it was called leningrad. leningrad — today, st petersburg. the dna, the roots are there, i've always been, always will be. but then what happens is that i come to america, i live five years, my first five years in new york, and then i conduct grand rapid symphony in michigan, and buffalo philharmonic, so altogether i think, what, 13, 14 years of life in america, becoming us citizen, having been stripped of my soviet citizenship when i applied for immigration. and, in a way, i suppose one could call it being born for the second time,

in certain ways. and then, life directs me to france and it was a change that happened both professionally as well as personally because i took the direction of the orchestre de paris and, at the same time, my life with marielle labeque has begun. and so ever since, and now it has been 33 years, i've been living in france. so i couldn't really define because the experience enriches your roots and enriches your identity and, of course, the privilege of being able to not only to travel as a tourist but actually work with orchestras, so opera houses in germany, austria, in this country in uk, in london specifically, and elsewhere. there you go, that is the life of a maestro. you did use that word �*roots', and if one takes the metaphor of a tree, a tree does have roots somewhere, and would it be fair to say, if i pushed you, that you are, in a sense,

a musician of russia? no, i don't think so. you see, this is the question that i'm being asked forever, "who are you?" laughs. i suppose that is what i'm saying. and the best answer i could come up with is i am a mixed salad. laughs. mixed salad. if i may, let's focus a bit more on the soviet experience. you stayed until your early 20s and then it seems you were pretty much forced to leave because it became clear to you that your feelings about the soviet union, your doubts about the system and the party were going to make it impossible for you to develop your musical career inside the soviet union. but, in a funny sort of way, i'm amazed they let you go. why did they let you go? i'm asking myself that question at the time, and we are talking about 1975.

this is the period of cold war. this is the period of brezhnev government. it is ideologically very strict and, well, with me, of course, who needs a musician? i was completely unknown outside of leningrad because i was still studying in the conservatory. so i don't think i represented any value to the establishment. however, my father was an important scientist who worked for many years in the sciences that were classified. and the danger was always that it often happened that if one member of the family would be dealing with classified information, the others wouldn't be allowed to leave. there was that danger and that's why when i asked

for permission to leave my parents decided to wait until i would be given an answer before applying for the exit visa themselves. so i was lucky, 30 days later, i received the permission. one thing that amazes me about you is the degree to which you, over the years working in these different countries and working with different orchestras, from the united states to france to germany to the czech republic, you say that you have an attitude almost like an actor who immerses themselves in a culture before they feel able to tell a story and interpret. what do you mean by this immersion? do you literally mean you have to speak the language, you have to go deep into culture before you're prepared to conduct the music? it's really fascinating what the nature of artistic creations is. imagine that in this country, let's say shakespeare.

the czechs will have smetana, dvorak. the russians will have a tchaikovsky, stravinsky, pushkin, etc, etc. everybody will have their own that represent not just their culture. they make the culture which is born from the nation itself, from its character, from its way of expressing itself because... so the question is, are outsiders qualified, in your view, to interpret? yes, yes, but one has to make that effort, that is the important thing. and how far do you go in that effort? i think that i am right in saying you speak five languages, is language a very important part of it? language is important for communication in the case of music, musicians. if one is not able to verbally formulate what one feels or thinks about a specific expression here or there,

you will sing it and your colleagues will understand what you mean. of course, you can speak the language, if you can, then you have this whole array of verbal expression because words are important. i know of writers sometimes pondering on the question of which specific word to choose that will best describe what they want to be described. and musicians doing exactly the same thing by other means. so let's take a specific example, you are in london to play mahler, and mahler i know is very important to you. he was born in what we now call the czech republic, he spent much of his life in vienna making music. yes, yes. are you saying that you couldn't properly understand and interpret mahler without knowing a great deal about the way czechs think, the way they behave, their humour, their culture, and you have to bring that to the music?

it's a, it's a hard question because it's complex. there are people who are not able to speak the language of the country in which piece of music or work of art has originated, and yet they have an instinct that will enable them to interpret it in a way that the natives of that country will feel being authentic in spirit, and there is plenty of that in music. when i think of karajan when he came with the berliners and played shostakovich symphony number 10 in moscow and leningrad at the time, the russians went crazy, they couldn't imagine anything like it. shostakovich was one of them, and yet. karajan captured the spirit? he captured the spirit even though he did not speak the language, and what i do know is he said if he were a composer, he would've wanted to compose like shostakovich. all right, let's just. it helps if you do, it does help. i'm thinking

of daniel day lewis. well, that's real immersion, or you could call it method acting to an extreme. it's not acting any more because he becomes the person who he has to incarnate, either onstage or in the film. he's also, some would say, almost impossibly demanding in terms of what he expects from those around him in the film business. are you impossibly demanding? i have read that at times you have even refused to play a symphony even though it's been scheduled and the audience is expecting you to arrive in the city and play it because you say, "i don't feel ready, my spirit isn't there, i'm not gonna do it." still, i'm still more demanding of myself than anybody else, and daniel is the same way. but it does make life a little difficult if you only are ready to perform if you absolutely feel it on the day.

you know, i have to have the right to stand on that podium and lead my colleagues, first in rehearsals and then in the performance, and convey, which means in a way to serve the music that i interpret and share it with my audience. if i'm not ready, it means i don't have the conviction of the kind that is necessary to do it, which means i don't have the right either to be there or to do that, which means i have to do something else. let us now talk about russia and ukraine. days after putin took that decision to send his forces as ukraine, you stood before an audience in london and expressed your pain your disgust at what was happening. you made a statement before a concert. i think you also got the orchestra to play the ukrainian national anthem.

why does this feel so direct and personal to you? once again, it's a very complex, complicated subject. we all know that there is in opinion, very widespread, that artists are to confine themselves to their art and leave politics to the politicians. that's very well known. i don't see this specific case of war, whether it's ukraine or any war for that matter, as a question of politics. for me, politics is a natural political process that exists in society, any society, every single a day. here we are talking about life and death. what does art deal with if not that? any works of art, what do they deal with if not to reveal the human condition, to reveal human nature? and we know how complex it is, it's not black and white. there is lots of in between which is grey. i think we also know that there is such thing

as the good in human nature and there is such thing as evil in human nature. and the whole balance that one tries to establish is that the evil can never win. where though do you draw the line between expressions of solidarity, where people in the west, including cultural institutions, want to express their support for ukraine and that teetering over a brink and becoming censorship of art and beauty? because just to finish the thought, there are institutions — the royal opera house in london scrapping a season from the bolshoi ballet. another orchestra in wales actually pulling a performance of a tchaikovsky piece. and that, to many, feels wrong, it feels like associating current politics and a rage against vladimir putin's actions with the censorship of an entire culture.

it is, i totally agree with that position. i could add to these examples the fact that when the war started, opera house in warsaw cancelled performances of boris godunov, mussorgsky. first of all, it has been composed in 19th century. secondly, it is about the tsar, which is about the absolute power of a monarch and the price he has to pay for that and his people. if those people who cancelled this performance knew what the opera was about, they would decide to perform it ten times a day. because it would be actually illustrative of the very problem that it represents? it is so relevant to what we live through today. let's make it a bit harder for you then, let's talk about perhaps less black and white but more grey areas. there are some individual

artists who have been, if you could put it this way, �*cancelled'. yes. one of the great russian conductors, gergiev, he was sacked, fired from his position in munich. many cheered that decision, others wondered, even if they didn't like gergiev because he's been a loyalist to putin, there's great evidence to suggest that he's been favoured with great wealth because of his association with putin. some still felt that cancelling an artist wasn't right. what about you ? that whole reaction that happened outside of russia when the war started in cancelling what we call, �*cancel culture' — cancel artists, cancel performances — it's in irrational reaction which is absolutely understandable because it simply signifies the revulsion

of humanity against this murderous regime. well, if you're describing it as both irrational but also understandable... because it's irrational in a sense that this is a reaction of the heart, it comes from the heart. but then in these complex individual cases, what would you do? again to take the example of gergiev because he's so closely allied to putin, does he have the right to perform or not in the west, where the common feeling is? if people in the west do not wish to hear him perform, it is absolutely their right to do so because they don't wish that. for me, the problem is in the fact that we put everything into the same pile, and that is actually should be viewed individually case—by—case. ok, i will keep the cases coming.

i will give you one case of a young pianist, i don't know, maybe he is maybe 20, 22, his name is malofeev. that was the very case i was going to raise with you. he's a guy at the beginning of what appears to be a brilliant musical career, he's young russian and he has seen concerts cancelled. in canada, for example, twice. and i read his post on the facebook page, it broke my heart. this kid had lived a very short time until now, had absolutely nothing to do with any of the actions or decisions of his government. and he said, i don't have the quote exactly in my mind now, but... i actually have the quote in front of me, he said, "every russian will feel guilty for decades because of the terrible and bloody decision that none of us could influence or predict." exactly. for me, cancelling performances

of this young man, i think, is extremely unjustified and, in fact, what it does is we have to look, for example, at the nazis in germany burning books, of those that they disapproved of, it's cancelling. so you're a passionate anti—putin figure who is saying that cancelling russian artists, in the way you just described, represents something akin to nazi approach to censorship? well, not a nazi approach, because we don't burn people, we don't kill people in that way. but what is the difference between them cancelling culture in their way, and us? if we do it on a case—by—case basis and it has to do with those figures that have consistently associated themselves with the regime, had all the benefits from the regime — the titles, the money, the opportunities,

the wealth accumulated, well, as far as i'm concerned, it's not a question of the being artist because i view artists as something else. this is being a wilful collaborator, for whatever reasons, opportunistic or not. it so difficult, though. i'm going to give one more example to you. tugan sokhiev. yes. he is fairly young, a talented conductor, he does a lot of work in the west but he also at the time of putin's invasion was music director of the bolshoi, as well as heavily involved with an orchestra in toulouse in france. he claims that he was required in france to issue a public statement condemning putin's invasion. he didn't feel he wanted to do that, so he actually took a radical decision and resigning from both posts. yes, but what he didn't say, and i would like to know it and i cannot claim anything because i don't know, was he under pressure from the putin regime to pronounce himself

in favour of the so—called special military operation, which is anything but? that, i don't know. but i wouldn't be surprised if he were to be pressured to show his approval of that action because most prominent figures in russia have been under pressure. i guess, i mean one fundamental principle is, do artists have the right to remain silent? yes. or can silence be complicity? it's an individual choice. what i wrote in my statement when the war started is that... once again, of course i have the quote but you might have it here, there are moments when silence in life, where silence is an acquiescence of evil and therefore becomes, which word did i use? �*ally�* if you will. but that's an individual choice to make. and i made mine

because i am free. and there are others who are not free. and i absolutely recognise their right to do decide that they wish to remain silent. it's just not my choice. but i do understand that they may have circumstances that are very complex that have to do it not only with them alone but with their families. but with their families, and choices have consequences. and you face consequences because after 1989, you went back to russia. yes, idid. and you performed and you clearly enjoyed that experience of return. absolutely. you will not be returning any more as long as vladimir putin is in power. does that matter to you? no, it doesn't and i'll tell you why. even if he invited me i wouldn't do it, not under these circumstances. because we think of russia, the world thinks of russia as one entity. what people don't realise is there are many different russias.

there is the russia of putin and those like him, and these are thugs. i know the streets, a lot of them from leningrad, and the driveways from which they came from, and i know their language and their ways, it's based on brutal physicalforce — who is stronger? "i'm stronger, i've proved it and that's how it is," without thinking that tomorrow someone will come who will be stronger than you, and that's why they always end up very badly, every single one of them. and for me, that part of russia is the russia, that noble russia of pushkin, shostakovich, rachmaninoff, you name it. it's the russia that they kidnapped. it's a russia that still exists. a final thought, it springs out of much that we discussed, do you think there is a place for nationalism and national identity in music?

there's a universality music but there is also something national about the way music appears in the world. absolutely, absolutely there is. i think the word �*nationalism' is sometimes misunderstood and turned into something very negative and threatening. i don't believe that. for me, nationalism is a reaction — reaction, for example, that people in czech republic would have, let's say 19th century, because they were always dominated by someone bigger and stronger, or reaction in the baltic republics or ukraine, doesn't matter, during the soviet empire time. they were nationalist — why? because they wanted to preserve their identity, their dna, their language, their culture, their way of life and their body language, because we all have a different one. and their music, their music became a part of that. the music is a mirror, mirror of life, music is life and life is music because music comes from life.

and in that sense, nationalism is something that is not only natural, it is totally understandable. what is not is the chauvinism, where you believe that what you have is better than anybody else's. and we know plenty of such people who believe that. that is not acceptable. racism is not accessible because it's more or less the same thing. and so it goes. so nationalism is something that makes the world — not nationalism but national expression and differences of national character and its expression, they make the world as rich as it is. it is a rich world. you make it richer. semyon bychkov, thank you very much for being on hardtalk. thank you so much. thank you, stephen.

hello. even with the weekend's rain in the west, it's been a rather dry month so far across most parts of the country. but if i show you the rainfall animation for this week, notice how it mounts up across these western areas, the colours deepening. it's here where we could see anything between 40—80 mm of rain, more especially around the hills and the coast. some eastern areas where so far thisjune, we've seen onlyjust over a quarter of our normal rainfall, not a huge amount is expected at all. although there's still a chance we could see a bit more towards the south east corner through the middle part of the week. the reason, well, areas of low pressure are going to come in off the atlantic and then stall before working northwards, as this one did from sunday, leaving a trailing weather front to take us into monday, which will produce sunshine and showers working their way eastwards, but much lighter winds than we saw through the weekend. so, this is how we start the day, the commuting temperatures somewhere between 11—13 degrees, not desperately cold out there.

but a line of cloud and showery rain western england, eastern wales to begin with, maybe just in the south east of scotland, too. that trundles its way eastwards through the day, fragmenting even more, but it does mean sunnier skies develop in its wake. just a few showers dotted around, not as many as we saw in the weekend, so western areas much, much brighter compared with sunday, though winds not as strong. still a noticeable breeze, though, coming infrom the south—west, and it's a slightly cooler direction for some of you compared with what we saw for the weekend, especially in the east of the country, but actually with more sunshine, lighter winds in the west, it should feel a touch warmer. temperatures 7—21, around we should be. early peak in the pollen levels in east anglia, the south east, and then a later peak of the west. and of course monday sees the start of wimbledon. cloudy skies to begin with, brightening up, you could just see a few spots of rain around lunch time, but mostly dry through the day. now dry into the evening and overnight, to come across eastern areas, but the next batch of wet and windy weather pushes in through northern ireland and towards the west. keeping temperatures here in teens for one or two, but a chillier night in the eastern half

of the country, 5—6 degrees in rural areas to start tuesday. so, this is the next area of low pressure for tuesday, and coming up off the atlantic and stalling. the winds blowing up the weatherfront, so it doesn't move a great deal. it will clear away from northern ireland in the morning, but will will linger across parts of central, south—western scotland, wales and push into the western fridges of england. brighter skies in the west later, always dry and brighter through central, eastern england, where it will be a bit warmer, 2a degrees a potential high. overall, though, temperatures around average for the time of year. more rain in the north and west, driest to the south and east.

welcome to newsday, reporting live from singapore, i'm suranjana tewari. the headlines: standing together — world leaders at the g7 summit call for unity to help ukraine defeat russia. we have to stay together. yes — we have to stay together. yes it _ we have to stay together. yes it is _ we have to stay together. yes. it is what putin has been counting on from beginning, that somehow nato and the g7 would splinter, but we haven't, and we aren't going to. in ukraine, residents reel from the latest act of russian aggression, as kyiv is struck by a barrage of missiles. at least four people are killed, after a wooden grandstand collapsed at a bullfighting festival in colombia.