a bit more substantial for something a bit more substantial for northern and western areas, an area of low pressure pushing this active weather front into northern and western areas and we have a few isobars in the chart so wet and windy sums it up well. it has already arrived in parts of the outer hebrides and northern ireland and western ireland, turning windy, and western ireland, turning windy, and it will stay pretty wet and windy through the night. rain eventually pushing across the irish sea, but you will notice central and eastern areas remaining dry and the winds won't be as strong and also plenty of clear spells, temperatures a bit lower, nine in the east but where we have the wet and windy weather, they will be rising, ii, 12, 13. this is the pressure chart i2, 13. this is the pressure chart to show the squeeze on the isobars, windy around the irish sea and heavy rainfall in western scotland down into wales, western england, and it clears northern ireland so here

sunshine and showers but quite blustery. eastern parts of england will escape the wet and windy weather and remain largely dry with sunshine so temperatures responding, 22, 23, and may be the odd passing shower but the wettest weather will be out west. it should stay dry tomorrow at wimbledon, around 21 degrees although the slim chance of a light shower but i think it will stay dry for the most part. as we move towards the middle and outer part of the week it remains unsettled. northern and western areas with most of the showers, dry out further south and east and the signs of high pressure trying to build in for next weekend and beyond which should settle things down. thank you very much. and that's it from the bbc news at ten. here on bbc one the news continues — as we nowjoin our colleagues across the nations and regions of the uk.

hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me arejournalist and broadcasterjenny kleeman, and christopher hope — the associate editor of politics at the telegraph. tomorrow's front pages starting with the metro which leads with the russian missile strike on the shopping centre in ukraine — and quotes president zelensky as saying the final death toll is "hard to imagine". the i describes it as "murder at the shops" and describes how 1,000 people inside scrambled for safety. the ft reports that nato will increase the number of troops defending its eastern flank sevenfold. the telegraph covers comments

by the head of the armed forces — who warns britain must be prepared to act rapidly to contain russia. the times reports on comments from borisjohnson that vladimir putin will pay for that barbaric attack. the guardian leads with demands by the doctors union, the bma, for a 30% pay rise over the next five years. let's start. a lot of front page pictures of the abstract on the shopping centre and i thought the i had the strongest in age, just showing the flames just directing through that building, the headline, murder at the shops, but 13 people confirmed dead so far, butjust looking at those flames, it's hard to imagine that that number is not going to rise. mi to imagine that that number is not going to rise-—

going to rise. all the reports this evenin: going to rise. all the reports this evening have _ going to rise. all the reports this evening have been _ going to rise. all the reports this evening have been saying - going to rise. all the reports this evening have been saying that i going to rise. all the reports this - evening have been saying that hopes have been phasing of finding any more people alive, an estimated thousand people in the middle of the day and that shopping centre when it was attacked. , many of the front pages have images like this can make use of the moving pictures, billowing black smoke, the shopping centre engulfed in flames, and this word, murder, on the front of the metro as well, murder, there is no reason for russia to attack this shopping centre. it's not an important location, it has no strategic value, it poses no threat to the russian army. this has parallels with the attack on that maternity hospital and variable in march. it is a cold—blooded attack on civilians and families, and there are going to be many casualties. —— mariupol. yesterday there was an attack on a block of flats in kyiv.

prodan expects to act with impunity, he knows that russia is not going to face any comebacks for killing civilians, for targeting civilians, this would've been a guided missile attack. so no matter what nato or the g7 view, this is a demonstration of the extent to which vladimir putin feels defiance and feels that he can terrorise the ukrainian people stop by g7 leaders have described it as a war crime. this area has been attacked in the last month or so, big oil refinery there. could this, would russia argue that this was a rogue missile? or do you take our other commentator�*s point on this? i take our other commentator's point on this? ~ , , . ., , on this? i think this is clearly aimed at _ on this? i think this is clearly aimed at what _ on this? i think this is clearly aimed at what is _ on this? i think this is clearly aimed at what is happening l on this? i think this is clearly| aimed at what is happening in germanx _ aimed at what is happening in germany. russia was in the gs, wasn't _ germany. russia was in the gs, wasn't it. — germany. russia was in the gs, wasn't it, and tell it invaded crime area -- _ wasn't it, and tell it invaded crime area —— crimea in 2014.1'm wasn't it, and tell it invaded crime area —— crimea in 2014. i'm sure thais— area —— crimea in 2014. i'm sure that's what's _ area —— crimea in 2014. i'm sure that's what's going on here. that's put saying — that's what's going on here. that's put saying look at me, look what i can do. _ put saying look at me, look what i can do. i_ put saying look at me, look what i can do, i think the journalism

sierra, — can do, i think the journalism sierra, as _ can do, i think the journalism sierra, as we will see across the front_ sierra, as we will see across the front pages— sierra, as we will see across the front pages tonight, is so important to brings _ front pages tonight, is so important to brings home that there is one tonne _ to brings home that there is one tonne distraction that russia is dishing — tonne distraction that russia is dishing out on ukraine. that's why it's so— dishing out on ukraine. that's why it's so important to be discussing it, it's so important to be discussing it. to _ it's so important to be discussing it. to be — it's so important to be discussing it, to be showing it, i think, it, to be showing it, ithink, for me, _ it, to be showing it, ithink, for me. there's _ it, to be showing it, ithink, for me, there's no question that this attack_ me, there's no question that this attack on — me, there's no question that this attack on the shopping centre is linked _ attack on the shopping centre is linked to— attack on the shopping centre is linked to what is going on in germanx _ linked to what is going on in germany. g7 are meeting without the gs germany. g7 are meeting without the 68 member_ germany. g7 are meeting without the gs member who was with putin and russia _ gs member who was with putin and russia and — gs member who was with putin and russia and him saying i don't care, look russia and him saying i don't care, took what — russia and him saying i don't care, took what i — russia and him saying i don't care, look what i can do, it is deeply depressing. look what i can do, it is deeply depressing-— look what i can do, it is deeply depressing. look what i can do, it is deeply de-aressin. , ' , . ., depressing. different picture on the front of the metro, _ depressing. different picture on the front of the metro, but _ depressing. different picture on the front of the metro, but we - depressing. different picture on the front of the metro, but we will - depressing. different picture on the front of the metro, but we will stay | front of the metro, but we will stay with the same story, because not only was at the meeting of the g7, volodymyr zelensky, of course, addressing those leaders by video conference and video cam, but also that announcement by president biden of this antimissile defence system for ukraine. this is a system used to defend the white house, isn't? it can 72 incoming targets at at any

one time. , , , ,., ., ., one time. yes, this is part of a very substantial— one time. yes, this is part of a very substantial package - one time. yes, this is part of a very substantial package that l one time. yes, this is part of a l very substantial package that joe very substantial package thatjoe biden has promised that america will provide for ukraine. this attack came hours after president zelensky joined the g7 by video link and asked explicitly for more sophisticated heavy weaponry, more protection from the skies. he was urging the g7 leaders to the help end the fighting before the winter, because it will be harder to fight back against russia when it is called. the fact is, you know, this is one way for russia to get attention, but also what russia wants is to grind ukraine down and make the rest of the world desensitized to the horrors he's perpetrating there, he wants the outrage of the international community to be tampered down, and i agree with christopher, it is report —— important that this remains on

front pages and we are able to be as horrified by these images as we were at the start of the year, because make no mistake, this is murder. there is no quick fix here, these nice _ there is no quick fix here, these nice boundaries, they can target targets— nice boundaries, they can target targets 100 miles away, but you do need _ targets100 miles away, but you do need to— targets 100 miles away, but you do need to be — targets 100 miles away, but you do need to be trained up to use them. clearly— need to be trained up to use them. clearly what we are seeing here is the west— clearly what we are seeing here is the west and for the long haul, as jenny— the west and for the long haul, as jenny says. — the west and for the long haul, as jenny says, this will not be ending anytime _ jenny says, this will not be ending anytime soon, this conflict and this shows— anytime soon, this conflict and this shows how— anytime soon, this conflict and this shows how the us is really tuning up and helping out during what will be a very— and helping out during what will be a very difficult long winter period. ukrainian — a very difficult long winter period. ukrainian commander suggesting that august might be the turning point in this conflict, presumably when a lot of this weaponry arrives and ukrainians have been trained up on it, just before begets to nato, and a moment, christopher, let's stay with the metro, because what sort of unity everything from the g7, do you think? head of the nato conference which will start tomorrow or the

next day in madrid. are we seeing that unanimity of thought, perhaps, now that we have seen schisms in the past, certainly, or rumoured schisms between france and germany? in the between france and germany? in de france in the — between france and germany? in de france in the uk, _ between france and germany? in de france in the uk, of _ between france and germany? in de france in the uk, of course, - france in the uk, of course, developing with boris johnson and emmanuel macron, that was long forecast _ emmanuel macron, that was long forecast because going into the election— forecast because going into the election in france on the this year, there _ election in france on the this year, there was— election in france on the this year, there was lots of anti—uk sentiment and that— there was lots of anti—uk sentiment and that appears to have gone away now and _ and that appears to have gone away now and even borisjohnson and that appears to have gone away now and even boris johnson talking about, _ now and even boris johnson talking about, well, showing where and to enjoy— about, well, showing where and to enjoy it _ about, well, showing where and to enjoy it but — about, well, showing where and to enjoy it but showing some politeness about _ enjoy it but showing some politeness about the _ enjoy it but showing some politeness about the french idea to have a wider— about the french idea to have a wider european nation and network to try and _ wider european nation and network to try and hook— wider european nation and network to try and hook in ukraine merely states— try and hook in ukraine merely states quite up to speed injoining the european union. we're looking into nato, — the european union. we're looking into nato, and of course, in the old days, _ into nato, and of course, in the old days, that was treated as an attempt

by the _ days, that was treated as an attempt by the us— days, that was treated as an attempt by the us to try to browbeat eu nations, — by the us to try to browbeat eu nations, european nations, they should _ nations, european nations, they should spend more on defence, well, the uk _ should spend more on defence, well, the uk is _ should spend more on defence, well, the uk is leading the way and it seems — the uk is leading the way and it seems likely that other countries will follow suit because the whole debate _ will follow suit because the whole debate has changed now about security— debate has changed now about security in mainland europe. gn debate has changed now about security in mainland europe. on that lane ben security in mainland europe. on that plane ben wallace, _ security in mainland europe. on that plane ben wallace, two _ security in mainland europe. on that plane ben wallace, two and - security in mainland europe. on that plane ben wallace, two and half- plane ben wallace, two and half percent gdp on defence spending. let's turn to the ft. nato increases persisted 300,000. that's a sevenfold increase. you cast your mind back to nato back in 2010 pay the annexation of crimea and everything else, this would just not have even been considered, would it? not at all. it's this idea instead of being a deterrent for us, nato is a defensive force on the eastern flank and that shows the extent to which western europe feels under threat and those countries that share a border with russia or are very close to russia, particularly the baltic states and poland feel

very much under threats, and this is a huge overhaul to protect those countries. in many ways, putin is the best thing that could've happened to those nato leaders who have always been saying that we are being complacent about the alliance that nato is fracturing. there is a new unity and a new resolve to invest in nato, but that is born of a very real fear that we need to have troops there who are able to act very quickly to defendant nato countries rather than just to deter russia from touching them. this would be considered an escalation from the kremlin and from russia's point of view, but increasing also the risk of a miscalculation here as well. , ., , ., ., ., well. there is no question that that is the danger- _ well. there is no question that that is the danger. nato _ well. there is no question that that is the danger. nato forces - well. there is no question that that is the danger. nato forces are - well. there is no question that that is the danger. nato forces are herej is the danger. nato forces are here in some volume getting nearer and nearer— in some volume getting nearer and nearer to _ in some volume getting nearer and nearer to russian troops and that's why when— nearer to russian troops and that's why when you have all of these weapons, — why when you have all of these weapons, you can go much further

than _ weapons, you can go much further than previous weaponry that ukraine had. than previous weaponry that ukraine had~ there _ than previous weaponry that ukraine had. there is a concern that you are risking _ had. there is a concern that you are risking that — had. there is a concern that you are risking that to happen, but equally, there _ risking that to happen, but equally, there is— risking that to happen, but equally, there is no— risking that to happen, but equally, there is no question that nato has -ot there is no question that nato has got to— there is no question that nato has got to be — there is no question that nato has got to be stronger and push back against _ got to be stronger and push back against russia to show russia that actually _ against russia to show russia that actually come you cannot have your own way, _ actually come you cannot have your own way, it's — actually come you cannot have your own way, it's cannot go further than it's gone _ own way, it's cannot go further than it's gone so— own way, it's cannot go further than it's gone so far in the eastern part of ukraine, — it's gone so far in the eastern part of ukraine, and that is why it is entirely— of ukraine, and that is why it is entirely necessary, with what nato are doing — entirely necessary, with what nato are doinu. a, ., ., are doing. moving on to the telegraph. _ are doing. moving on to the telegraph, army _ are doing. moving on to the telegraph, army chief, 1937| are doing. moving on to the _ telegraph, army chief, 1937 moments, these comments are similar comments were brief, when they? they came from a message she sent to the armed forces nearly a week ago. that is quite strong language, though, isn't it? 1937 moment and an impending conflict it certainly suggests. this is the chief _ conflict it certainly suggests. this is the chief of _ conflict it certainly suggests. this is the chief of the _ conflict it certainly suggests. try 3 is the chief of the general staff, general sir patrick sanders drawing parallels with nazi germany and saying we need to be ready to fight,

ready to win to counteract russian expansionism, echoing the same rhetoric that boris johnson expansionism, echoing the same rhetoric that borisjohnson has been using and drawing parallels between putin's russia and nazi germany. this is at a time that we have been saying that defence secretary, ben wallace, has written to the prime minister asking for the defence budget to be permanently increased to 2.5% of gdp. if you have been speaking and interviewing, as i'm sure you have, any serving or are former military leaders, they have been decrying defence cuts. at the moment, the plan is still to cut manpower in the army from making 82,000 said just over 70,000 troops, thatis 82,000 said just over 70,000 troops, that is still the case. this cannot be given how much geopolitics within europe has changed stop at the smallish english army, i think, for 300 years was a figure i remembered. absolutely. borisjohnson will have

to act, he will have to say something, there has been a formal request from the defence secretary come at this rhetoric, you know, putting vladimir putin on par with adolf hitler in terms of an enemy that we need to be prepared to fight back, it takes years to build up that capability, so these are very strong words. that capability, so these are very strong words-— that capability, so these are very strong words. moving on to a story “ust below strong words. moving on to a story just below that, _ strong words. moving on to a story just below that, because _ strong words. moving on to a story just below that, because we - strong words. moving on to a story just below that, because we have i just below that, because we have more time to discuss this story about the army chief in the next look at the papers, but nicola sturgeon sets course for a fresh referendum. how is she going to do this bearing in mind that westminster, borisjohnson has said that there will not be one? it’s that there will not be one? it's very hard _ that there will not be one? it's very hard for— that there will not be one? it's very hard for her, and she's trying to keep _ very hard for her, and she's trying to keep her— very hard for her, and she's trying to keep her base happy in scotland, the fact— to keep her base happy in scotland, the fact that the party regularly butts— the fact that the party regularly butts in— the fact that the party regularly pulls in the 40s shows how... to keep— pulls in the 40s shows how... to keep them — pulls in the 40s shows how... to keep them excited about the idea the prospect— keep them excited about the idea the prospect of independence, and there's— prospect of independence, and there's no question that boris johnson — there's no question that boris johnson well turned down under section— johnson well turned down under section 30 order so there is no way

that we _ section 30 order so there is no way that we will— section 30 order so there is no way that we will allow nor recognise any pills that we will allow nor recognise any bitts over— that we will allow nor recognise any pills over independence, than their own bole _ pills over independence, than their own pole with their own money set aside _ own pole with their own money set aside as— own pole with their own money set aside as we — own pole with their own money set aside as we saw two weeks ago, maybe 20 or £30 _ aside as we saw two weeks ago, maybe 20 or £30 million to do this, then she's hoping that this will be enough _ she's hoping that this will be enough to force the hand of london and whether it works we will find out. and whether it works we will find out it _ and whether it works we will find out it in— and whether it works we will find out. it in what she has to do, i think. — out. it in what she has to do, i think. to — out. it in what she has to do, i think, to maintain rather factories attiance _ think, to maintain rather factories attiance in— think, to maintain rather factories alliance in scotland and people encouraging and excited about independence. the encouraging and excited about independence.— encouraging and excited about inde endence. , ., . , independence. the semantics here interesting. _ independence. the semantics here interesting. a _ independence. the semantics here interesting, a choice _ independence. the semantics here interesting, a choice rather - independence. the semantics here interesting, a choice rather than i independence. the semantics here interesting, a choice rather than a | interesting, a choice rather than a referendum. interesting, a choice rather than a referendum-— interesting, a choice rather than a referendum. , , , ., referendum. yes, because she may not be leaall referendum. yes, because she may not be legally allowed _ referendum. yes, because she may not be legally allowed to _ referendum. yes, because she may not be legally allowed to cover _ referendum. yes, because she may not be legally allowed to cover a _ be legally allowed to cover a referendum without westminster�*s say so, but she can call for a vote that is advisory, and embarrassing for the uk government if it looks like the scottish people would be voting yes to independence this time. she

saysin yes to independence this time. she says in this piece, she's quoting this piece saying that the uk would be no position to lecture any other country about democratic norms, the need to