hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are broadcaster and psychotherapist lucy beresford, and joe twyman, director of the polling organisation deltapoll. the observer says an official inquiry will investigate the prime minister's claim that a0 new hospitals will be built by 2030. in what the sunday express reports as an exclusive,

ministers have urged borisjohnson and rishi sunak to cut taxes now rather than wait until the next election. another story about the prime minister — the telegraph reports he has been accused of turning a blind eye to alleged sexual misconduct claims about his deputy chief whip. same as the mirror, who say he was warned twice about chris pincher�*s behaviour. meanwhile, the sunday times says the prince of wales has granted an honour to a peer — who reportedly spent £1.7 million bailing out the prince's eco—village. they also feature a colourful picture from today's pride celebrations. travel delays take the lead in the sunday people — the last hope to save the summer holidays. and finally, the daily star says "let's all get hot and dirty" with a heatwave on the way. so let's begin...

welcome to do it, and we will start with the sunday times understood it, the headline that the prince of wales�*s thai can build out his field equal village. wales�*s thai can build out his field equalvillage. i wales's thai can build out his field equal village-— equalvillage. i suppose it hasn't actually been — equalvillage. i suppose it hasn't actually been a _ equalvillage. i suppose it hasn't actually been a very _ equalvillage. i suppose it hasn't actually been a very good - equalvillage. i suppose it hasn't actually been a very good week. equal village. i suppose it hasn't l actually been a very good week for the royal family actually been a very good week for the royalfamily in general, but it was only a week ago that there was a story about prince charles having collected wads of cash in fortnum & mason carrier bags, and there is also the news that a report into the alleged bullying by the duchess of sussex and the results of that have been suppressed. and this story comes out today, and that is before we get onto any of the stories that came out of prince andrew. at the moment, anybody of the right clothes and the queen seems to be behaving in a way that is not as edifying for the royal family in in a way that is not as edifying for the royalfamily in general, and obviously that is of great concern.

however views as a nation towards the monarchy tend to be very much wrapped up in our views about the queen, but as other studies on the front page have alluded to, she is stepping back for many of her duties. we are going to be coming on to that story later. but we know that she is not going to be with us forever. hopefully, that is going to be a long time coming, but there are going to be other members of the royalfamily stepping up, and if they are going to be waiting into they are going to be waiting into the quagmire is of scandal in the next few years, that is going to be very difficult for how the nation views the monarchy. jae. very difficult for how the nation views the monarchy.— views the monarchy. joe, your thou~hts views the monarchy. joe, your thoughts on — views the monarchy. joe, your thoughts on this _ views the monarchy. joe, your thoughts on this headline. - views the monarchy. joe, your thoughts on this headline. a l views the monarchy. joe, your. thoughts on this headline. a very difficult headline for the moment for the royalfamily in general? that's right. this particular story is the _ that's right. this particular story is the latest in a series of bad news — is the latest in a series of bad news stories are to leave the palace — news stories are to leave the palace in _ news stories are to leave the palace. in this instance, the suggestion is that someone had helped — suggestion is that someone had helped the prince financially was

given _ helped the prince financially was given an — helped the prince financially was given an honour, and also, it appears. _ given an honour, and also, it appears, was the let one of the prince's— appears, was the let one of the prince's properties for his birthday party _ prince's properties for his birthday party. and — prince's properties for his birthday party. and this is simply the latest in a series— party. and this is simply the latest in a series of difficult stories for the palace — in a series of difficult stories for the palace and for the royal family generally — the palace and for the royal family generally. prince charles himself has now— generally. prince charles himself has now had two stories come out. i'm sure _ has now had two stories come out. i'm sure that— has now had two stories come out. i'm sure that in both cases pictures but denied — i'm sure that in both cases pictures but denied that any impropriety took place. _ but denied that any impropriety took place. but _ but denied that any impropriety took place, but in the court of public opinion, — place, but in the court of public opinion, this could be a difficult position— opinion, this could be a difficult position for the prince. f, opinion, this could be a difficult position forthe prince. f, and i opinion, this could be a difficult position for the prince. f, and i do stress _ position for the prince. f, and i do stress out, — position for the prince. f, and i do stress out, if— position for the prince. f, and i do stress out, if momentum gains against — stress out, if momentum gains against him becoming king. not that of course _ against him becoming king. not that of course it— against him becoming king. not that of course it is voted on in it is something _ of course it is voted on in it is something that he has to be elected to. something that he has to be elected t0~ but _ something that he has to be elected t0~ but if— something that he has to be elected to. but if he is not seen as a trawler— to. but if he is not seen as a popular figure when he does ascend to the _ popular figure when he does ascend to the throne, that could have really — to the throne, that could have really big _ to the throne, that could have really big implications for the

monarchy in this country. the other story we're — monarchy in this country. the other story we're looking _ monarchy in this country. the other story we're looking at _ monarchy in this country. the other story we're looking at on _ monarchy in this country. the other story we're looking at on the - monarchy in this country. the other story we're looking at on the front i story we're looking at on the front page of the times, about chris pincher and that features on a few of the front pages tomorrow. chris pincher, of the front pages tomorrow. chris pincher. the _ of the front pages tomorrow. chris pincher, the mp _ of the front pages tomorrow. chris pincher, the mp for _ of the front pages tomorrow. chris pincher, the mp for tamworth, and the deputy— pincher, the mp for tamworth, and the deputy chief whip, has been accused — the deputy chief whip, has been accused of bad behaviour towards two people _ accused of bad behaviour towards two people come and allegations have been made against him. under comments in the papers today that the conservative party didn't move fast enough to discipline him, given the circumstances of the allegations. he has said that she is seeking _ allegations. he has said that she is seeking medical help with the issues, — seeking medical help with the issues, and has denied some of the allegations, but certainly it is the latest _ allegations, but certainly it is the latest in — allegations, but certainly it is the latest in a — allegations, but certainly it is the latest in a series of difficult stories— latest in a series of difficult stories for the prime minister and for the _ stories for the prime minister and for the conservative party in qerrerat _ for the conservative party in general. and as each one of these

stories— general. and as each one of these stories continues, prevents the conservatives from being able to seize _ conservatives from being able to seize the — conservatives from being able to seize the initiative when it comes to the _ seize the initiative when it comes to the kind — seize the initiative when it comes to the kind of stories that they want _ to the kind of stories that they want to— to the kind of stories that they want to put out about policies and about _ want to put out about policies and about ideas and about efforts they say they— about ideas and about efforts they say they are making. they can't do that if— say they are making. they can't do that if every— say they are making. they can't do that if every weekend there is another— that if every weekend there is another story about bad behaviour from _ another story about bad behaviour from mps — another story about bad behaviour from mps. �* , another story about bad behaviour from mps. . _ ,, ._ from mps. and, lucy, the sunday teleu-rah from mps. and, lucy, the sunday telegraph leads _ from mps. and, lucy, the sunday telegraph leads with _ from mps. and, lucy, the sunday telegraph leads with the - from mps. and, lucy, the sunday telegraph leads with the story - from mps. and, lucy, the sunday telegraph leads with the story as| telegraph leads with the story as well, with the headline pmi turned a blind eye to six pest mornings. as joe was saying, the wider issue here, apart from the actual allegations, it's about what the prime minister new and when, what she didn't know, and hisjudgment, i guess. she didn't know, and his 'udgment, i cuess. , , . ., , , guess. yes, chris pincher was put into the vault _ guess. yes, chris pincher was put into the vault as _ guess. yes, chris pincher was put into the vault as deputy _ guess. yes, chris pincher was put into the vault as deputy chief- guess. yes, chris pincher was put| into the vault as deputy chief whip into the vault as deputy chief whip in february, and what is being suggested is that borisjohnson was

aware before that appointment was made that there were at least rumours flying around about chris pincher�*s behaviour, alleged behaviour in some cases, an boris johnson has come out and said, that was really more room. but that's what has been talked about in some of the papers tonight is that boris johnson himself had a nickname for chris pincher, that she was very handy and yet he was print shirt by name, pinch about nature, and that gives rise to the suggestion that it was a very widely known among certain individuals as to what kind of behaviour was being talked about. and again, it makes it very difficult for borisjohnson to step away, to step aside from this particular story. away, to step aside from this particularstory. if away, to step aside from this particular story. if we then start to become a link to it in terms of the fact that he knew what was going on. in the fact that he knew what was going on. ., , the fact that he knew what was going on. . , ,., , .,

on. in the telegraph saying in that article on friday, _ on. in the telegraph saying in that article on friday, downing - on. in the telegraph saying in that article on friday, downing street | article on friday, downing street said that the prime minister was not aware of, quote, any specific allegations relating to chris pincher before the appointment was made to the role of deputy chief whip. made to the role of deputy chief whi -. , ., made to the role of deputy chief whi . , . , made to the role of deputy chief whi -. , . , , ., whip. yes, and this is quite an interesting _ whip. yes, and this is quite an interesting one _ whip. yes, and this is quite an interesting one in _ whip. yes, and this is quite an interesting one in terms - whip. yes, and this is quite an interesting one in terms of- whip. yes, and this is quite an. interesting one in terms of what whip. yes, and this is quite an - interesting one in terms of what we might almost, the —— call of the hr dynamic of the story, which is how much of this was formerly acknowledged and written down. several of the studies in the papers tonight of referencing the fact that certain behaviour was alleged, but the actually formal complaint was made, and that subsequently come in february, when it did look as if chris pincher was going to given this role and got back into the whips office, when concerns were raised at that point, one of the ethics committee did look into it, but discovered that there was no

formal record of anything having been alleged against chris feature, so they can actually make any recommendation. so, there really is to some extent a feeling of hr policy within westminster in general, and this has also been highlighted with some of the other a sleazier story sector come out this year, but in terms of when you want, it is hard to actually make a decision based on hearsay or remark, but one has to ask, when it is a rumour about one cause for concern, but if there are lots of rumours about the same person, then maybe at that point some alarm bells ought to ring. that point some alarm bells ought to rina. �* , ., that point some alarm bells ought to rina. . , ., ., ., that point some alarm bells ought to rina. �* . ., ., ring. and you were alluding a moment auo to the ring. and you were alluding a moment ago to the fact — ring. and you were alluding a moment ago to the fact that _ ring. and you were alluding a moment ago to the fact that stories _ ring. and you were alluding a moment ago to the fact that stories like - ago to the fact that stories like this make it very difficult for the government to make headway is with what it does want to talk about policies and so forth, not making any headway on the front page of tomorrow's observer other, but this

headline... tomorrow's observer other, but this headline- - -— headline... yes, that's out. this is auoin headline... yes, that's out. this is going back — headline... yes, that's out. this is going back to _ headline... yes, that's out. this is going back to claims _ headline... yes, that's out. this is going back to claims that - headline... yes, that's out. this is going back to claims that were - headline... yes, that's out. this is l going back to claims that were made at the _ going back to claims that were made at the last— going back to claims that were made at the last election, that the conservatives would build 40 new hospitai — conservatives would build 40 new hospital. the national audit office is investigating the screen. which is investigating the screen. which is worth— is investigating the screen. which is worth pointing out that the government has said that they would io government has said that they would -o to government has said that they would go to hospitals by 2030, so there is a technically still time, but the nationai— a technically still time, but the national audit office talks about the fact — national audit office talks about the fact that it is very difficult to see — the fact that it is very difficult to see how all of these properties could _ to see how all of these properties could he — to see how all of these properties could be kept, giving the complexity, giving the financing, and also — complexity, giving the financing, and also given the fact that some of the building work at least is not really— the building work at least is not really new hospital is as much as it is refurbishment of existing hospitals, extensions of buildings, that sort— hospitals, extensions of buildings, that sort of thing. and it goes back to the _ that sort of thing. and it goes back to the question of probity, to the

question— to the question of probity, to the question of honesty and feeds into this narrative around the conservatives. they have had such difficulty— conservatives. they have had such difficulty shifting the idea that they can't be trusted when it comes to many— they can't be trusted when it comes to many things. and they can't be trusted when it comes to many things— to many things. and 'ust to interrupt, * to many things. and 'ust to interrupt, the t to many things. and 'ust to interrupt, the first _ to many things. and just to i interrupt, the first paragraph, to many things. and just to - interrupt, the first paragraph, the political editor at the observer commencing concerns in whitehall that the pledge is unaffordable and been greatly oversold to the public. so, that is not something any political party wants to see himself accused of, is it?— political party wants to see himself accused of, is it? absolutely. and i think the conservatives _ accused of, is it? absolutely. and i think the conservatives will - accused of, is it? absolutely. and i think the conservatives will be - think the conservatives will be hoping — think the conservatives will be hoping that this is really too technical, and deals with minute details _ technical, and deals with minute details that most people won't be paid too— details that most people won't be paid too much attention to, they will hope — paid too much attention to, they will hope that the story well, if it does _ will hope that the story well, if it does look— will hope that the story well, if it does look like bad news for the government, there will be hoping, i assume, _ government, there will be hoping, i assume, that they can in effect just fronted _ assume, that they can in effect just

fronted out~ — assume, that they can in effect just fronted out. but if a series of such a stories— fronted out. but if a series of such a stories lead into the next general election. _ a stories lead into the next general election. it— a stories lead into the next general election, it does really raise questions about the promises that the conservatives met, but it also of course — the conservatives met, but it also of course raises questions about the promises _ of course raises questions about the promises are all political parties make _ promises are all political parties make. �* ., . ~ promises are all political parties make. ., , ., , promises are all political parties make. ., , ., make. back to the story that you mentioned _ make. back to the story that you mentioned a _ make. back to the story that you mentioned a little _ make. back to the story that you mentioned a little earlier, - make. back to the story that you mentioned a little earlier, but i make. back to the story that you mentioned a little earlier, but toi mentioned a little earlier, but to the front page of the sunday telegraph. queen's lighter duty is confirmed by paris. tell us about the details. l confirmed by paris. tell us about the details-— confirmed by paris. tell us about the details. �* ,, ., , , the details. i didn't know this, but a- arentl the details. i didn't know this, but apparently the _ the details. i didn't know this, but apparently the queen's _ the details. i didn't know this, but apparently the queen's official- apparently the queen's official duties at routine down constitutionally. when i think about, why wouldn't that be written down? but apparently it has been revised since the platinum jubilee to take into account the fact that, obviously, some of the things that she has had to do in the past are very onerous, wearing that incredibly large and heavy crown that she was to the state 0pening incredibly large and heavy crown that she was to the state opening of parliament. what we saw at the most recent set up and was that prince

charles took place with camilla beside him. so, really, what we are getting in this annual report from the palace is a revision of the list of things that the queen is going to be doing. 0ne of things that the queen is going to be doing. one of those things was that normally her duties would be both paying and receiving overseas estate visitors, and paying her own visits overseas. that is obviously probably not going to happen again, that has been a lexus might that change under way, aren't we? tote that has been a lexus might that change under way, aren't we? we will talk about that _ change under way, aren't we? we will talk about that more _ change under way, aren't we? we will talk about that more and _ change under way, aren't we? we will talk about that more and the - change under way, aren't we? we will talk about that more and the rest - change under way, aren't we? we will talk about that more and the rest of l talk about that more and the rest of the front page is more a little later, but for the moment, thank you very much. that is it for the papers this hour. lucy and joe will be back at half ii.30pm for another look at the papers. next, in a special interview at the nato summit, my colleague kasia madera spoke to the polish president andrzej duda. goodbye for now.

at the first major nato summit since russia's invasion of ukraine, leaders reminded the world of the purpose of this collective defence alliance. we have reaffirmed that our article flag commitment is sacred. and an attack on one is an attack on all, and we will defend every inch of nato territory. this was a historic summit. finland and sweden's accession will notjust increase nato's membership, but will also double the length of its border with russia. as ukraine appealed for more support, the alliance fundamentally shifted its response to russia and made a strong pledge. ukraine can count on us for as long as it takes. and for the first time in nato's history, the us military

will have a permanent base in eastern europe.