hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are the journalist and author shyama perera and also katy balls — deputy political editor of the spectator. hello again to you both. a quick look through the front pages for our viewers. the observer leads with keir starmer�*s green growth plan, which he says will "boostjobs and slash emissions".

"you ain't seen nothing yet," reads the front of the sunday express — as the chancellor kwasi kwarteng says the tax cuts announced in his mini budget are "just the start". the sunday telegraph also leads with continuing conservative tax cuts, as it reports the prime minister plans to cut taxes again in the new year. the independent shows a photo of women protesting in iraq following the death of mahsa amini in iran. harry rednapp and his wife sandra are on the front of the sunday mirror — talking about her struggle with coronavirus — describing it as "covid hell". the sun leads with the news that prince harry is trying to make last minute changes to his memoir following the queen's death. and the sunday times has a photo of roger federer and rafael nadal holding hands after their doubles defeat on friday — which was federer�*s final professional match.

so, a flavour of the front pages you will be waking up to tomorrow morning. let's begin, lovely to have you both back. katy balls, you will kick us off first. you ain't seen nothing yet, apparently. find kick us off first. you ain't seen nothing yet, apparently. and yet we did see quite _ nothing yet, apparently. and yet we did see quite a _ nothing yet, apparently. and yet we did see quite a lot _ nothing yet, apparently. and yet we did see quite a lot on _ nothing yet, apparently. and yet we did see quite a lot on friday, - nothing yet, apparently. and yet we did see quite a lot on friday, they . did see quite a lot on friday, they called it a mini budget, did see quite a lot on friday, they called ita mini budget, in did see quite a lot on friday, they called it a mini budget, in large because there was no obr forecast to go along with it, a fiscal event that would normally happen in the event of a budget. yet we saw a series of tax cuts announced, and pretty drastic ones. notjust the idea of the income tax being cut brought forward, but also the highest owners will receive a tax cut and it has left many tory mps surprised. some supporters of liz truss was surprised by how far the prime minister and chancellor went here. and yet the sunday express is saying that we haven't seen anything yet, there will be more to come. i

think the idea of more tax cuts in the next budget, whether that is later this year or in the new year, it clearly fits in to a wider strategy by this government which is really to take a disruptive stance when it comes to what came before, and chart a new direction on the economy. it is very different to what boris johnson economy. it is very different to what borisjohnson and rishi sunak did and also other tory predecessors. if you look at the market response on friday to some of this, there was a question as to can the new government when the confidence of the markets? and also start to see some results in this, which would mean more tax cuts would be possible, or do they get into a tricky place quite quickly. just be possible, or do they get into a tricky place quite quickly.- tricky place quite quickly. just to move on from _ tricky place quite quickly. just to move on from this, _ tricky place quite quickly. just to move on from this, if _ tricky place quite quickly. just to move on from this, if we - tricky place quite quickly. just to move on from this, if we have i tricky place quite quickly. just to i move on from this, if we have more to come, the question is, these haven't been costed._ to come, the question is, these haven't been costed. they haven't been costed _ haven't been costed. they haven't been costed and _ haven't been costed. they haven't been costed and it's _ haven't been costed. they haven't been costed and it's interesting i been costed and it's interesting that katy— been costed and it's interesting that katy balls says we have to wait and see _ that katy balls says we have to wait and see and there is so much we

haven'i_ and see and there is so much we haven't yet— and see and there is so much we haven't yet properly unpacked even in terms _ haven't yet properly unpacked even in terms of— haven't yet properly unpacked even in terms of what it means to different— in terms of what it means to different regions of the country and different— different regions of the country and different types of people. we can see those — different types of people. we can see those at the top will benefit enormously and it is difficult for us to— enormously and it is difficult for us to understand how all of that benefit — us to understand how all of that benefit will trickle down to those of us _ benefit will trickle down to those of us who — benefit will trickle down to those of us who are at the bottom. certainly— of us who are at the bottom. certainly in the two year lifetime of liz _ certainly in the two year lifetime of liz truss's government. i find it interesting — of liz truss's government. i find it interesting that the headline, you ain't seen— interesting that the headline, you ain't seen nothing yet, because of course _ ain't seen nothing yet, because of course the — ain't seen nothing yet, because of course the song by bachman turner overdrive _ course the song by bachman turner overdrive which starts i met a devil woman, _ overdrive which starts i met a devil woman, she — overdrive which starts i met a devil woman, she took my heart away, she said i_ woman, she took my heart away, she said i had _ woman, she took my heart away, she said i had it _ woman, she took my heart away, she said i had it coming to me but i wanted — said i had it coming to me but i wanted it— said i had it coming to me but i wanted it that way. so it's the perfect — wanted it that way. so it's the perfect headline for what is happening and we ain't seen nothing yet, happening and we ain't seen nothing yet. that's— happening and we ain't seen nothing yet, that's true, that is what is happening _ yet, that's true, that is what is happening-— yet, that's true, that is what is haueninu. ., ., ., happening. you do realise you have created an earworm _ happening. you do realise you have created an earworm for— happening. you do realise you have created an earworm for us, - happening. you do realise you havel created an earworm for us, shyama, hearing those lyrics. we will turn to the independent. the affluent will do well and it's the middle that will pay. will do well and it's the middle

that will pay-— will do well and it's the middle that will pay. labour's claims is that will pay. labour's claims is that the giveaway _ that will pay. labour's claims is that the giveaway will - that will pay. labour's claims is that the giveaway will damage l that will pay. labour's claims is i that the giveaway will damage the poorer parts of the country, and i think as we just heard there is so much to unpack on friday. the markets reacted quite coolly but i think some of that is trying to work out what exactly has just happened because we didn't have all the analysis to go along with it, and one of the things they announced was this idea of investments earns and ultimately the suggestion here is in these investments earns them more likely to go to one of these wealthier counties, rather than perhaps those named in the levelling up perhaps those named in the levelling up agenda which was a flagship and the borisjohnson. i think to understand what the government is trying to do, effectively driving of this new government is to have economic growth, increase gdp, so i think it probably does mean a bit of a pivot away from some of the emphasis in the previous government under borisjohnson whereby i think liz truss and kwasi kwarteng are more comfortable focusing on some of

the areas that are already pretty prosperous in the uk and investing in those on the basis, or they would argue, that by doing this you increase prosperity for the whole country. i think the question is, are you still doing enough for the red wall areas which were clearly such a key part of the 2019 electoral win?— such a key part of the 2019 electoral win? such a key part of the 2019 electoralwin? ,, ,~ ., i. _, electoralwin? shyama, if you could take us to the _ electoralwin? shyama, if you could take us to the front _ electoralwin? shyama, if you could take us to the front page _ electoralwin? shyama, if you could take us to the front page of - electoralwin? shyama, if you could take us to the front page of the - take us to the front page of the sunday times, part of the growth plan according to the paper is liz truss's intention to increase, or rather, push for more migrants to come to the uk. which sectors specifically is she targeting? initially she is targeting broadband sunply, _ initially she is targeting broadband supply, because apparently we desperately need broadband engineers to support the government's pledged to support the government's pledged to make _ to support the government's pledged to make full fibre broadband available to 85% of uk homes by 2025 _ available to 85% of uk homes by 2025 i_ available to 85% of uk homes by 2025. i think we know that alongside these, _ 2025. i think we know that alongside these, but _ 2025. i think we know that alongside these, but not as part of this new budget, _ these, but not as part of this new budget, we've got a drive to bring in the _ budget, we've got a drive to bring in the nurses and doctors from

overseas _ in the nurses and doctors from overseas. we constantly have a hunger— overseas. we constantly have a hunger for— overseas. we constantly have a hunger for tech companies and tech experts _ hunger for tech companies and tech experts from overseas. i suppose what — experts from overseas. i suppose what she's _ experts from overseas. i suppose what she's doing is she is kind of making _ what she's doing is she is kind of making a — what she's doing is she is kind of making a pledge, a public pledge, that brings in more people who might not automatically have jobs to come to but _ not automatically have jobs to come to but have — not automatically have jobs to come to but have the skills that will get them _ to but have the skills that will get them across the border and give them them across the border and give them the freedom to search for work here. there _ the freedom to search for work here. there is_ the freedom to search for work here. there is a _ the freedom to search for work here. there is a senior government source who says _ there is a senior government source who says we — there is a senior government source who says we cannot tear up our immigration rules. people who voted for brexit— immigration rules. people who voted for brexit to want to see controlled migration— for brexit to want to see controlled migration and that there is a view within— migration and that there is a view within the — migration and that there is a view within the treasury that migration is good _ within the treasury that migration is good for— within the treasury that migration is good for growth as long as it is controlled — is good for growth as long as it is controlled. suella braverman will obviously— controlled. suella braverman will obviously need to back this and she was a _ obviously need to back this and she was a rabid — obviously need to back this and she was a rabid brexiteer, kemi badenoch, jacob rees—mogg. but liz truss seems tojust badenoch, jacob rees—mogg. but liz truss seems to just be badenoch, jacob rees—mogg. but liz truss seems tojust be motoring on regardless — truss seems tojust be motoring on regardless of how much support she has, as— regardless of how much support she has, as long as she has her loyal coterie _ has, as long as she has her loyal coterie around her she is quite happy— coterie around her she is quite happy to— coterie around her she is quite happy to absolutely dismiss the fact

that her— happy to absolutely dismiss the fact that her backbenchers are quaking in their boots. — that her backbenchers are quaking in their boots, as is half the country. it is their boots, as is half the country. it is not _ their boots, as is half the country. it is not brexit position, isn't it, because it will be interesting to see who wants to come or who wants to return after what happened. yes. and i think to return after what happened. yes. and i think it— to return after what happened. yes. and i think it is— to return after what happened. yes. and i think it is an _ to return after what happened. is; and i think it is an interesting point wejust heard and i think it is an interesting point we just heard in the sense that liz truss is clearly in a hurry and part of the reason she is trying to push these things through now is she was the longest serving cabinet minister before becoming prime minister and she is acutely aware of the fact that a prime minister's stock tends to go down and not up with their party the longer they are in power which is why she is trying to push so much through all at once. but there is two issues. first of all who will you attract if you relax the rules? but before you even get there, can she get it through her cabinet? it is touching on the fact this is perhaps herfirst big potential cabinet row, some are voicing alarm. and i think it goes back to the eu referendum campaign where there are two different campaigns, vote leave was the

official campaign. at times they struck a more pro—immigration tone than leave.eu, the campaign nigel farage was attached to and i think it will be interesting to see whether liz truss, somebody who backed remain is able to convince some of her brexiteer and colleagues that her where is the right way when it comes to pushing this through. let's turn to the sun on sunday, shyama. harry's £35 million book wobble. i shyama. harry's £35 million book wobble. , , , �* ., wobble. i suppose this isn't a light sto , but wobble. i suppose this isn't a light story. but it _ wobble. i suppose this isn't a light story, but it feels _ wobble. i suppose this isn't a light story, but it feels quite _ wobble. i suppose this isn't a light story, but it feels quite light - story, but it feels quite light after— story, but it feels quite light after what we have been discussing. it is after what we have been discussing. it is only— after what we have been discussing. it is only 35— after what we have been discussing. it is only 35 million we are discussing and it is only a sort of not quite — discussing and it is only a sort of not quite a — discussing and it is only a sort of not quite a billionaire young man who will— not quite a billionaire young man who will benefit from this £35 million — who will benefit from this £35 million. so it is more money to the rich but _ million. so it is more money to the rich but not — million. so it is more money to the rich but not quite as much money as say with— rich but not quite as much money as say with government policy. and here we think— say with government policy. and here we think harry, or the sun on sunday thinks, _ we think harry, or the sun on sunday thinks, that— we think harry, or the sun on sunday thinks, that harry is having a wobble — thinks, that harry is having a wobble because the book which he has already— wobble because the book which he has already had _ wobble because the book which he has already had passed for publication by his— already had passed for publication

by his publishers, penguin random house, _ by his publishers, penguin random house, is _ by his publishers, penguin random house, is apparently, allegedly, believably, full of not very pleasant observations about the royal _ pleasant observations about the royal family, specifically his father— royal family, specifically his father and his recently dead grandmother, and he is having some sort of— grandmother, and he is having some sort of wobble about this and is asking — sort of wobble about this and is asking to— sort of wobble about this and is asking to make changes to it before it is published. the asking to make changes to it before it is published.— it is published. the scottish mail on sunday also _ it is published. the scottish mail on sunday also going _ it is published. the scottish mail on sunday also going with - it is published. the scottish mail on sunday also going with this i it is published. the scottish mail i on sunday also going with this story but quoting £40 million. yes. on sunday also going with this story but quoting £40 million.— on sunday also going with this story but quoting £40 million. yes. we are not sure which _ but quoting £40 million. yes. we are not sure which one _ but quoting £40 million. yes. we are not sure which one is _ but quoting £40 million. yes. we are not sure which one is more _ but quoting £40 million. yes. we are not sure which one is more correct i not sure which one is more correct on harry's payday. it’s not sure which one is more correct on harry's payday-— on harry's payday. it's a lot of mone . on harry's payday. it's a lot of money- in _ on harry's payday. it's a lot of money. in bid _ on harry's payday. it's a lot of money. in bid to _ on harry's payday. it's a lot of money. in bid to turn - on harry's payday. it's a lot of money. in bid to turn down i on harry's payday. it's a lot of. money. in bid to turn down £40 million memoir. _ money. in bid to turn down £40 million memoir. if— money. in bid to turn down £40 million memoir. if you - money. in bid to turn down £40 million memoir. if you are - money. in bid to turn down £40| million memoir. if you are being paid such huge sums, whether it is 35 or 40, a publisher will expect you, whether it is part of a three book deal, which in prince harry's case, they expect more than one book, they will expect you to reveal things, they would expect you to make news. it sounds as though,

based on these reports, there are some nerves as to whether some of those reveals will be a bit too edgy given recent events, and could lead to something of a backlash for him. we will return to the front page of the sunday times, shyama. we have set some good buys, some real sporting greats recently, and two of them, only one of course going, but two sportsmen on the front page of the sunday times.— the sunday times. absolutely, and now, i the sunday times. absolutely, and now. i know _ the sunday times. absolutely, and now. i know you — the sunday times. absolutely, and now, i know you are _ the sunday times. absolutely, and now, i know you are quite - the sunday times. absolutely, and now, i know you are quite sporty. i now, i know you are quite sporty. but i _ now, i know you are quite sporty. but i know — now, i know you are quite sporty. but i know which one is federer and which _ but i know which one is federer and which one _ but i know which one is federer and which one is— but i know which one is federer and which one is nadal and i know what federer— which one is nadal and i know what federer has — which one is nadal and i know what federer has done but i have to be completely honest i don't think i've seen him _ completely honest i don't think i've seen him play ever. but this doesn't mean _ seen him play ever. but this doesn't mean that— seen him play ever. but this doesn't mean that i— seen him play ever. but this doesn't mean that i don't admire him for what _ mean that i don't admire him for what he — mean that i don't admire him for what he has done. i think it is terribly— what he has done. i think it is terribly sad he is retiring, but it is good — terribly sad he is retiring, but it is good to— terribly sad he is retiring, but it is good to retire while you are at the top — is good to retire while you are at the top of— is good to retire while you are at the top of your game. we saw serena williams _ the top of your game. we saw serena williams do _ the top of your game. we saw serena

williams do it. it is great that these — williams do it. it is great that these tennis stars are showing us how to _ these tennis stars are showing us how to do — these tennis stars are showing us how to do it. they are living with humility, — how to do it. they are living with humility, good grace, charm, and a little _ humility, good grace, charm, and a little bit _ humility, good grace, charm, and a little bit of— humility, good grace, charm, and a little bit of tears. isn't it lovely to see — little bit of tears. isn't it lovely to see a — little bit of tears. isn't it lovely to see a couple of grown men crying on a programme that isn't love at first sight— on a programme that isn't love at first sight or marriage at first sight? — first sight or marriage at first sight? i— first sight or marriage at first si . ht? . . first sight or marriage at first siiht? .., _, first sight or marriage at first siuht? ,., sight? i can confirm he is a pleasure — sight? i can confirm he is a pleasure to _ sight? i can confirm he is a pleasure to watch, - sight? i can confirm he is a| pleasure to watch, reminds sight? i can confirm he is a - pleasure to watch, reminds me of steffi graf who is like a gazelle on the court. katy balls? i steffi graf who is like a gazelle on the court. katy balls?— the court. katy balls? i agree in this sense. _ the court. katy balls? i agree in this sense, we _ the court. katy balls? i agree in this sense, we often _ the court. katy balls? i agree in this sense, we often get - the court. katy balls? i agree in this sense, we often get lots i the court. katy balls? i agree in this sense, we often get lots of| this sense, we often get lots of attention on women crying in sport but these are two men. as you say, it is interesting that the pair obviously played against each other so many times over the years, but in this event in federer�*s last match a part of a double set they didn't win, but that's not the reason they are crying. i think it isjust taking in the enormity, of course of roger federer�*s career, butjust a pair of them. roger federer's career, but 'ust a pair of themfi roger federer's career, but 'ust a pair of maxi roger federer's career, but 'ust a pair of them. thank you to the pair of ou, pair of them. thank you to the pair of you. shyama — pair of them. thank you to the pair of you, shyama and _ pair of them. thank you to the pair of you, shyama and katy _ pair of them. thank you to the pair of you, shyama and katy enjoy - pair of them. thank you to the pair of you, shyama and katy enjoy the j of you, shyama and katy enjoy the rest of your weekend and evening.

and thank you for being with us this evening. from the team and myself, goodbye. hello, and a very warm welcome to the film review on bbc news. i'mjane hill, and taking us through this week's cinema releases, as ever, is mark kermode. hi, mark. very interesting week. we have don't worry darling — eagerly awaited after all the stuff that went on in venice. we have blonde, which may be a marilyn monroe biopic, or maybe not. oh, i thought it was a biopic, but anyway, more on that later. ok, so don't worry darling,

which is a new film by olivia wilde, who made booksmart, which i loved. florence pugh and harry styles are alice and jack chambers. they live in a kind of absolutely rarefied, dreamy, late �*50s, early �*60s americana, you know, glistening cars, mad men suits, fabulous dresses. the wives stay at home and prepare the house and cook the meals and wait for the return of their husbands, who are out doing work which cannot be spoken of when they come back. and florence pugh's character seems to think this is idyllic and wonderful. and then, one of her friends and neighbours becomes suicidal after leaving the village, which they're not allowed to do, and going out into the desert and encountering something. and alice starts to think, "hang on a minute, this isn't what it seems. there's a conspiracy going on here." here's a clip. violet, where did you meet bill? we met on a train... to boston. yeah.

yes, you dropped your ticket and you bent down, picked it up, gave it to you, right? it is. yeah. that's how margaret met ted and peg, am i right in thinking that that's how debbie mcintyre met her husband? yes, lam. that's how they met. yes, that's true. i'm jealous. honestly, it's such a sweet story. isn't that funny? that's incredible. there are so many different stories that were told. we're told what we remember, until... ..we try to remember things that they want us to forget... ..like margaret. alice! no, jack. it's ok. i'm curious to hear where she's going with this. - frank is doing something to us. so, frank's played by chris pine, who is the sort of the eminence grise behind all of this, this victory, this somehow idyllic

americana that doesn't exist and isn't real.