according to mr not conservative according to mr gove. the times leads with criticism from the former cabinet minister and to grant chaps this time over that scrap, out that plan to scrap the 45p rate of income tax. that is the front page of the times. let's turn to the eye. we are turning to the financial times, shall be? the ft says that the pm's chancellor will defy the rebellion insisting his plan yet it's is the right one. the telegraph says that the rebellious mps have got their way, reporting on a delay to the boat on the cuts amid fears that mps will not back it. next, the front page of the mirror says, will that help the prime minister survive? that's the question. the mere will lead with report saying that a failure to make a u—turn would lead to lee's stress

being hosted by christmas. finally, away from politics, the paper leads with a call from spice girl, mel b, that politician should do more to combat domestic abuse. a little flavour of those front pages there. let's kick off this time around with the times. we were saying how many more political big beasts or tory voices would bejoining more political big beasts or tory voices would be joining that of michael gove. we have grants chaps on the front page of the times. that is rants on the front page of the times. that is grants chaps. _ on the front page of the times. that is grants chaps, liz _ on the front page of the times. twat is grants chaps, liz truss got into her office and said he was one of the most effective cabinet ministers but he would be sacked because he didn't back her. he turned against her comments on this like she knows nothing about politics. very odd. the way this has been handled from a party management point of view is it would be an insult to images to call it amateur hour. she inherited a

divided and unhappy party, and instead of attempting to bring the party together, think tanks, all of that sort of stuff, she decided to launch into a series of controversial tax cuts and not unsurprisingly, mps are saying that they are not going to go for it. this is really basic stuff. make sure you've got your mps on side before you announce radical new policy. before you announce radical new oli . ., . , , policy. continued cuts is the way this is described. _ policy. continued cuts is the way this is described. the _ policy. continued cuts is the way this is described. the neck- policy. continued cuts is the way this is described. the neck it - this is described. the neck it is. never mind reading the room, read the country. all we are hearing about our pressures on our bills, and our cost of living generally, the price of food, the price of fuel, the price of— the price of food, the price of fuel, the price 0 fuel, the price of every consumable that we may _ fuel, the price of every consumable that we may need _ fuel, the price of every consumable that we may need this _ fuel, the price of every consumable that we may need this coming - fuel, the price of every consumable i that we may need this coming winter, and she _ that we may need this coming winter, and she has_ that we may need this coming winter, and she has pulled this one out of the hat. _ and she has pulled this one out of the hat. i— and she has pulled this one out of the hat, i know. let'sjust look after_ the hat, i know. let'sjust look after the — the hat, i know. let'sjust look after the top earners who are going to benefit _ after the top earners who are going to benefit the most who will be able to benefit the most who will be able to afford _ to benefit the most who will be able to afford their houses more easily and pay— to afford their houses more easily and pay less tax. not quite clear where _ and pay less tax. not quite clear where this— and pay less tax. not quite clear where this money is even coming from, _ where this money is even coming from. which _

where this money is even coming from, which is why there are so many riddles— from, which is why there are so many riddles in_ from, which is why there are so many riddles in the — from, which is why there are so many riddles in the market. it does tell you something when michael gove comes_ you something when michael gove comes across as an elder statesman speaking _ comes across as an elder statesman speaking the voice of reason. here is the _ speaking the voice of reason. here is the marr— speaking the voice of reason. here is the man who lots of people considered to be the responsible for the bre>

that involve sacrificing kwasi kwarteng? l that involve sacrificing kwasi kwarteng?— that involve sacrificing kwasi kwartenu? ~ ., kwarteng? i don't think that make the skill and _ kwarteng? i don't think that make the skill and damage _ kwarteng? i don't think that make the skill and damage that - kwarteng? i don't think that make the skill and damage that she's i the skill and damage that she's managed to do to the party reputation such as it is, it is catastrophic. sacking kwasi kwarteng won't change the fact that the public have had a look at her and they are not happy and not impressed. that's what those ground—breaking opinion polls showed us last week with labour and most pools leading by 33%. she's already done the damage. the damage is already done. talking about sacking kwasi kwarteng isn't going to bring anyone back. ijust want kwasi kwarteng isn't going to bring anyone back. i just want to say something, that mps don't come into politics to make people's lives harder. i don't know anyone who went into politics for those reasons. a lot of time, literally millions of people are scared about how they are going to get through the next six months. to even talk about tax cuts, never mind tax cuts for higher

earnersjust never mind tax cuts for higher earners just seems obscene to me. it is so against the mood of the public. read the country, but ijust don't know what sort of mood mps are going to be and when they come back from recess. ijust imagine tory mps are sitting there with their heads in their hands thinking it is all over. the idea that mps are going to vote for this tax cut in march, which is when the boats will be, probably in the next finance bill, the idea that we are going to come out the other end of this hard winter and people are going to be sitting there saying, oh, yeah, let's cut taxes to the riches. it's just absurd. let's cut taxes to the riches. it's just absurd-— just absurd. it's really got you, this story. _ just absurd. it's really got you, this story. i — just absurd. it's really got you, this story, i can _ just absurd. it's really got you, this story, i can tell. _ just absurd. it's really got you, this story, i can tell. carry - just absurd. it's really got you, this story, i can tell. carry on. | this story, i can tell. carry on. just, you know... so many people are going to have such a terrible time in the next couple of months, and there will be people who can't sleep at night. i can't remember things being really this bad in this country ever before. so this we

could have been herfirst conference speech as a leader, everyone would have been saying that this is their opportunity to present your ideas to the country, to the party, but she didn't do that. she did the most reckless thing that she could have possibly done. i have no explanation why she's done this this way i no idea how it is going to pan out. that deeply concerns me. tow;r that deeply concerns me. tony mentioned _ that deeply concerns me. tony mentioned the _ that deeply concerns me. tony mentioned the timing - that deeply concerns me. tony mentioned the timing of- that deeply concerns me. tony mentioned the timing of this i that deeply concerns me. tony mentioned the timing of this boat in the daily telegraph has that is their top story, liz truss delays their top story, liz truss delays the boat on 45p tax cut. from what we have just heard, the boat on 45p tax cut. from what we havejust heard, doesn't the boat on 45p tax cut. from what we have just heard, doesn't matter any more? we have just heard, doesn't matter an more? ~ , we have just heard, doesn't matter any more?— any more? well, it is, we like to thinkthat _ any more? well, it is, we like to think that politicians _ any more? well, it is, we like to think that politicians are - think that politicians are pragmatic, that when they are shown they are _ pragmatic, that when they are shown they are wrong, they are willing to turn, _ they are wrong, they are willing to turn, to— they are wrong, they are willing to turn, to alter the course of the ship, _ turn, to alter the course of the ship, however, what this means me is that the _ ship, however, what this means me is that the reasons, if this boat gets delayed, — that the reasons, if this boat gets delayed, the reasons for doing it

will he _ delayed, the reasons for doing it will he to— delayed, the reasons for doing it will be to ensure success, which will be to ensure success, which will he _ will be to ensure success, which will he to— will be to ensure success, which will be to ensure success, which will be to ensure the survival and the future — will be to ensure the survival and the future success of the tory party to remain _ the future success of the tory party to remain in — the future success of the tory party to remain in power. it'sjust a self propagating meeting, and there seems to be propagating meeting, and there seems to he a _ propagating meeting, and there seems to be a vacuum of morality. as michael— to be a vacuum of morality. as michael gove has said, it is immoral to he _ michael gove has said, it is immoral to be making this benefits for the highest _ to be making this benefits for the highest earners. the ones who need it least, _ highest earners. the ones who need it least, and — highest earners. the ones who need it least, and crankshafts rating in the times— it least, and crankshafts rating in the times about when pain is around, pain must— the times about when pain is around, pain must he — the times about when pain is around, pain must be shared. this isn't being — pain must be shared. this isn't being shared. this is not a pie cut into equal— being shared. this is not a pie cut into equal parts. so whether or not this boat— into equal parts. so whether or not this boat happens, i think you mentioned earlier that downing street— mentioned earlier that downing street had said this is not the case — street had said this is not the case. however, the telegraph is very close _ case. however, the telegraph is very close to _ case. however, the telegraph is very close to those people making those decisions _ close to those people making those decisions i— close to those people making those decisions. i guess we will find out, perhaps— decisions. i guess we will find out, perhaps not— decisions. i guess we will find out, perhaps not this week. but what does liz truss _ perhaps not this week. but what does liz truss do— perhaps not this week. but what does liz truss do at conference now? does she go— liz truss do at conference now? does she go up— liz truss do at conference now? does she go up storming and sticking to the line _ she go up storming and sticking to the line that she has been preaching thus far— the line that she has been preaching thus far and show that she is a woman— thus far and show that she is a woman of— thus far and show that she is a woman of conviction i love her favourite — woman of conviction i love her favourite to margaret thatcher prototype? or does she show that she

is listening _ prototype? or does she show that she is listening to her party and change her tune? — is listening to her party and change hertune? take your is listening to her party and change her tune? take your option. the latter— her tune? take your option. the latter of— her tune? take your option. the latter of the two evils as far as she is— latter of the two evils as far as she is concerned. it did you summon on the _ she is concerned. it did you summon on the radio— she is concerned. it did you summon on the radio saying last night they are really— on the radio saying last night they are really going to lose face and the presenter quite rightly pointed out that— the presenter quite rightly pointed out that people will be losing far more _ out that people will be losing far more than a little bit of face in the coming months on the back of these _ the coming months on the back of these decisions. like the coming months on the back of these decisions.— these decisions. like you say, olitical these decisions. like you say, political futures _ these decisions. like you say, political futures versus - these decisions. like you say, | political futures versus general public and real life. that statement that you mentioned they are, caroline, was actually sent to us from been right, our political correspondent never the raise in response to what the telegraph are reporting saying that number ten says that there is no delay to about abolishing the 25p top rate of text, the finance bill that has not been scheduled but would usually follow the budget, which is due next year. tony, front page of the telegraph to with this paper. the other story here is that hospitals scrapped more than 22,000 appointments every day. yes. this isjust another example than 22,000 appointments every day. yes. this is just another example of the severe pressures of the nhs. it

also really worries me that the mood music from the government is they are going to pay for these tax cuts for the richest earners by cutting public services. by the way, also, they are repealing the rise in national insurance that rishi sunak brought and that was specifically designed to get more money to the nhs and social care. they haven't explained how they are going to replace that extra funding. it is just another example of a deeply worrying picture. as we all know, winter is a critical time for the nhs, the fact that they are already cutting appointments and people are missing out on treatments is worrying. but this isjust missing out on treatments is worrying. but this is just a missing out on treatments is worrying. but this isjust a poor attempt at how badly things could get over the winter. this is at a time, by the way, when the nhs has got record workforce vacancies. we don't have enough doctors, not enough nurses, not enough dentists. if i was the government dealing with that sort of issue would be my number one priority, not whittling

on about your views and your ideologies and frankly, some really quite odd comments and statements that we've had from senior government ministers in the last week or so. government ministers in the last week or so-_ week or so. worrying figures in terms of numbers _ week or so. worrying figures in terms of numbers of— week or so. worrying figures in terms of numbers of nurses . week or so. worrying figures in - terms of numbers of nurses leaving the nhs. the times connecticut tickets to the front page of the times, and seven months later, the us has been war—gaming. they are getting nervous about mr pruden. yes, the fact that this has been sguashed — yes, the fact that this has been squashed under the side of the papers — squashed under the side of the papers is — squashed under the side of the papers is quite telling. this has become — papers is quite telling. this has become noise in our ears. ifear that— become noise in our ears. ifear that the — become noise in our ears. ifear that the familiarity has led us into a false _ that the familiarity has led us into a false sense of security, this bubble — a false sense of security, this bubble sign. it's become vietnam in the background. bailey, president putin— the background. bailey, president putin is— the background. bailey, president putin is not picking up his ball and going _ putin is not picking up his ball and going away. all sorts of reports coming — going away. all sorts of reports coming from russia from the state of his health. _ coming from russia from the state of his health, from the state of his support— his health, from the state of his support even within his crony ship. meanwhile, — support even within his crony ship. meanwhile, the americans are saying he has _ meanwhile, the americans are saying he has to— meanwhile, the americans are saying he has to he — meanwhile, the americans are saying he has to be taken seriously. they

thought _ he has to be taken seriously. they thought he — he has to be taken seriously. they thought he was accused of sabre rattling — thought he was accused of sabre rattling last week, mentioning that type of— rattling last week, mentioning that type of nuclear weapons. at the americans— type of nuclear weapons. at the americans are saying that they have looked _ americans are saying that they have looked at _ americans are saying that they have looked at the data, they have sorted out every _ looked at the data, they have sorted out every pathway he could take and this has _ out every pathway he could take and this has to _ out every pathway he could take and this has to be taken seriously. yes, another— this has to be taken seriously. yes, another hit — this has to be taken seriously. yes, another bit of doom and gloom and varying _ another bit of doom and gloom and varying worrying news to bead on the front of— varying worrying news to bead on the front of the _ varying worrying news to bead on the front of the page. at varying worrying news to bead on the front of the page.— front of the page. at that takes us nicel to front of the page. at that takes us nicely to the front _ front of the page. at that takes us nicely to the front page _ front of the page. at that takes us nicely to the front page of- front of the page. at that takes us nicely to the front page of the - nicely to the front page of the guardian. this survey shows that most young people fear for their future. i went to pick up on what you said earlier, this uncertainty that everybody is feeling. a couple of months ago, post—pandemic, we were talking about how critical uncertainty in business was. how damaging it was. we have seen how uncertainty has been damaging in the markets and here, we have on the front page 60—25 —year—olds —— 16—25 —year—olds do not know what they face. lt -year-olds do not know what they face. , . , ., ~ -year-olds do not know what they face. , . , . ~' ~' face. it is heartbreaking. likei said earlier, _ face. it is heartbreaking. likei said earlier, politicians - face. it is heartbreaking. likei said earlier, politicians don't . face. it is heartbreaking. like i| said earlier, politicians don't go into politics to make people's lives worse. at such an indictment of us

as a country that the people who don't have hope are the young people. the people who should be the most hopeful about the future. they feel this dread and this concern about their own lives. you know, i have been covering parliament for 12 or 13 years. i have heard many governments stand up and talk about the housing crisis, but none of them have built one or 2 million homes that we need and that means that homeownership becomes unaffordable for young people. these are the sort of systemic problems that we expected our politicians. this is the thing we expect politicians to sort out. i've been missing them talk about it for well over a decade. i stop and see massive house—building programmes taking place. ifeel our house—building programmes taking place. i feel our political system has failed young people, and that makes me very sad. you should be in a position where you should be able to give people hope, that their lives to be even better than their parents were. even better from this research that this is how they feel.

if you want to quickly add your thoughts. if you want to quickly add your thou~hts. ., , if you want to quickly add your thou~hts. .,, _ if you want to quickly add your thou~hts. .,, ,._ ., if you want to quickly add your thou~hts. .,, h, ., ., thoughts. people say that full of ha iness thoughts. people say that full of happiness or _ thoughts. people say that full of happiness or contentment - thoughts. people say that full of happiness or contentment to - thoughts. people say that full of i happiness or contentment to many people _ happiness or contentment to many people to — happiness or contentment to many people to love and look after, have a purpose — people to love and look after, have a purpose in your life, and something to look forward to. this seems _ something to look forward to. this seems to— something to look forward to. this seems to be lacking from this data, doesn't _ seems to be lacking from this data, doesn't it? — seems to be lacking from this data, doesn't it? the idea that a job prospect— doesn't it? the idea that a job prospect will never recover from the pandemic _ prospect will never recover from the pandemic. it's heartbreaking and not surprising _ pandemic. it's heartbreaking and not surprising. to pandemic. it's heartbreaking and not surrisinu. ., , . ., ., surprising. to hit such a young age urou - , surprising. to hit such a young age groom 16. — surprising. to hit such a young age grouo. 16- yeah. — surprising. to hit such a young age group, 16. yeah, that _ surprising. to hit such a young age group, 16. yeah, that is _ surprising. to hit such a young age group, 16. yeah, that is worrying. | group, 16. yeah, that is worrying. thank you very much to both of you. enjoy the best of your week. tony, you will be watching very closely what happens in birmingham, i can tell. thank you very much. thank you for watching us here on bbc news. of course, those papers will be back with us tomorrow evening. but we have also got them online for you as well so you can catch up and read those front pages for yourself. plenty more coming up shortly. i believe it's the film review. good

night. i'mjane hill, and to take us through this week's cinema releases, as ever, mark kermode. hi, mark. hello. we're walking the full length of the counter this week. we have mrs harris goes to paris, which pretty much does what it says on the tin. we have the woman king, which is a sweeping epic with viola davis. and there's a new film by peter strickland, flux gourmet, which i am very much looking forward to discussing with you. yes. plenty to be said there. but let's start with the glorious lesley manville. so, mrs harris goes to paris, which is based on a book by paul gallico, who wrote

the snow goose and the poseidon adventure and a bunch of things that were adapted. lesley manville is ada harris. she earns a living cleaning for rich clients, who are often horrible, who own dior dresses. she's waiting for her husband to return from the war — he's not coming back. she discovers, finally, he's not coming back and she gets a war widow's pension. and she decides, "ok, i'm going to make my dream come true. "i'm going to take whatever money i have, whatever other "money i can get together, i'm going to go to paris and i'm "going to buy myself a dior dress like i have seen in the houses "of these glamourous women that i clean for." so she goes to paris and she turns up at the house of dior, where isabelle huppert is, let's be honest, not pleased to see here. here's a clip. she speaks french this lady wishes to buy a dress. direct her to a suitable shop. go. please, let me escort you out. no, no, no, no, hang ona minute! i've come miles, saved every penny, scrubbing floors and i don't know- what, so i can buy this frock. a christian dior gown is not for pennies. if you think i ain't - got the money, there.