tv The Papers BBC News October 5, 2022 10:30pm-10:46pm BST
10:30 pm
contemplate him doing just that, yeah, taking a rocket up to the space station and shooting and hopefully being the first civilian to do a spacewalk outside of the space station. the hollywood sign�*s just had a lick of paint, as the movie industry this city was built on is going through huge transformation. the pandemic, the cost of living crisis and the rise of the streaming platforms means for the average movie lover, there's no place like home. i think we can enjoy things at home on streaming, of course. but in order to make movies matter, to create movie stars and to create, you know, directors and careers, it really does need that theatrical experience. ..the power to destroy themselves... langley has wooed big—name directors like christopher nolan. his new film oppenheimer will be released by universal. steven spielberg, too, is back at the studio where he made et. back to the future was filmed here, is that right? back to the future,
10:31 pm
to kill a mockingbird. it is all a long way from the isle of wight where langley, whose biological father was egyptian, was adopted and grew up. back then, you probably weren't seeing, you know, yourself reflected back in many of the people on that island. no, i was, um... i think what they would describe me as is "exotic", and it gave me a great sense of independence and, you know, i was bullied a little bit in school as well, and so i had to really tough it out. my tour guide is now dame donna for services to film and entertainment, a brit who is redefining showbusiness on earth and perhaps even in space. katie razzall, bbc news, los angeles. and you can hear the full interview with donna langley on the media show in the bbc sounds app. time for a look at the weather. here's nick miller. a double rainbow end to the day after the rain cleared with the sunshine appearing. still heavy showers around. we have seen quite a
10:32 pm
few continue into this evening. quite a lot of rain so far this week. in western scotland, over 100 mil metres in places will stop the rain cleared today although showers continue across parts of scotland and northern ireland. those in north—west england will fade away. for many places overnight, dry and clear but still blustery and much cooler than it was last night. you will notice that in the morning with temperatures five or 10 degrees down across many parts of england and wales but there is a lot of sunshine to begin the day. in scotland, showers around and in parts of northern ireland. there is a zone of thicker cloud running through north wales, the midlands and north in england and it will have showery rain. south of that, mainly drive through south—east england and east anglia. parts of eastern scotland will stay dry until quite late. western scotland will turn much wetter by the afternoon with rain spreading through the central belt. average wind speeds, gusts are higher across the north with 40, may 50 mph. if you are out of the wind
10:33 pm
in the sunshine there is still warmth to be had especially with temperatures in eastern england. tomorrow evening, scotland will turn more widely wetter with rain heading into northern ireland overnight. thru friday that moves south with more squally winds not reaching the south—east until after dark. ahead and behind, blustery showers to be had with sunny spells in the north west. fewer showers and wind on saturday before running into northern and western areas on sunday. next week is still looking very much like autumn but no sign of anything significantly colder on the horizon. thanks, nick. and that's bbc news at ten on wednesday the 5th of october. there's more analysis of the day's main stories on newsnight with victoria derbyshire, which is just getting underway on bbc two. the news continues here on bbc one as now it's time to join our colleagues across the nations and regions for the news where you are. but from the ten team, it's goodnight.
10:34 pm
hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are lucy beresford, who is a broadcaster, and sam lister, the political editor of the daily express. hello to you both. a quick look through the front pages for viewers. "movin�* on up — or is liz movin�* on out?" the lyrics from m people's hit song are not lost on the metro, as the paper questions the prime minister's political future. us hits out at oil cuts that "align 0pec with russia", says the ft, as production is slashed by two million barrels a day. the aye has cabinet rebellion
10:35 pm
growing, and reports on ministers pressurising the pm to reverse plans to squeeze benefits. —— the -- the i. "income taxes to rise by £21 billion, despite budget," says the telegraph. "anti—growth coalition" named by the prime minister, as truss delivers a new commonenemy to fractured tory party — that's in the guardian. "defiant liz takes fight to her critics" — that's in the daily mail. "stop the killer dogs" campaigns the mirror, writing about a wave of dangerous attacks this year. and in the sun, "manc food is manky" — the paper's reporting on controversial comments made by city gundogan�*s partner. so that was a quick look at our front pages, let's begin our chat.
10:36 pm
hello to you both. lucy, you'll kick us off for this edition, and it's the front page of the metro. and of course there was so much speculation on social media when we heard it would be a 90s hit, and the paper plays on the lyrics of the song, "moving on up, or is liz moving on out?" 50 "moving on up, or is liz moving on out?“ "moving on up, or is liz moving on out?" , ., , "moving on up, or is liz moving on out?“ , _ ~ "moving on up, or is liz moving on out?" ,, ~, out?" so the song is by m people, and the writer _ out?" so the song is by m people, and the writer of _ out?" so the song is by m people, and the writer of the _ out?" so the song is by m people, and the writer of the song - out?" so the song is by m people, and the writer of the song has - and the writer of the song has complained about the fact that they used their song, so that's one of the controversies around the speech. but also the lyrics aren't that straightforward— it sounds very upbeat, a dynamic song for her to walk on stage to, and we know she's spoken herself about how she's not a great orator, she sometimes comes across as quite stiff. so the idea that she'd come onto the stage to this fantastic song made advisers think they were on to a hit here. but the lyrics of the song go to
10:37 pm
talk about less positive things, and the fact that you might be on your way out — i think it's a song about break up, so they hadn't read the lyrics too well, or it wasn't there go to karaoke song. it's one of the facets of this particular speech which divided critics as to whether it was a good song, in the same way that the speech itself divided critics — some said it was very energised and presented a very clear ideology, whereas other people said it was lacking in compassion and too brutal. sojust like it was lacking in compassion and too brutal. so just like the song, the speech divided opinion.- brutal. so just like the song, the speech divided opinion. sam, what did ou speech divided opinion. sam, what did you make _ speech divided opinion. sam, what did you make of— speech divided opinion. sam, what did you make of it _ speech divided opinion. sam, what did you make of it all? _ speech divided opinion. sam, what did you make of it all? i _ speech divided opinion. sam, what did you make of it all? i mean, - did you make of it all? i mean, obviously _ did you make of it all? i mean, obviously after _ did you make of it all? i mean, obviously after the _ did you make of it all? i mean, obviously after the week - did you make of it all? i mean, obviously after the week the i did you make of it all? i mean, - obviously after the week the prime minister— obviously after the week the prime minister has had, it really was a bil minister has had, it really was a big moment, wasn't to? but i think she came _ big moment, wasn't to? but i think she came out, she was very clear and concise, _ she came out, she was very clear and concise, it _ she came out, she was very clear and concise, it was — she came out, she was very clear and concise, it was quite short — two
10:38 pm
messages — concise, it was quite short — two messages in _ concise, it was quite short — two messages in it, really, one was talking — messages in it, really, one was talking to — messages in it, really, one was talking to the contrary, she says, "i talking to the contrary, she says, "i got _ talking to the contrary, she says, "i got your— talking to the contrary, she says, "i got your back, i'm going for growth," _ "i got your back, i'm going for growth," and the other was a message about whose _ growth," and the other was a message about whose side are you on? which ostensibly. — about whose side are you on? which ostensibly, again, a message of the public, _ ostensibly, again, a message of the public, are — ostensibly, again, a message of the public, are you on the side of the people _ public, are you on the side of the people trying to do the best in the film people trying to do the best in the right thing? but also the subtext of that is— right thing? but also the subtext of that is it _ right thing? but also the subtext of that is it was a message to the party, — that is it was a message to the party, whose side are you on? "we are on _ party, whose side are you on? "we are on the — party, whose side are you on? "we are on the same pride, why are we fighting?" — are on the same pride, why are we fighting?" i— are on the same pride, why are we fighting?" i think that was what i took— fighting?" i think that was what i took away— fighting?" i think that was what i took away from the speech. obviously there was— took away from the speech. obviously there was this greenpeace protest in there was this greenpeace protest in the middle _ there was this greenpeace protest in the middle of it — i must say it was quite _ the middle of it — i must say it was quite ingenious that they unveiled the banner and that was quickly takeh _ the banner and that was quickly taken off— the banner and that was quickly taken off them, but they brought a back-up _ taken off them, but they brought a back—up banner which they quickly whipped _ back—up banner which they quickly whipped out which was quite amusing. ithink— whipped out which was quite amusing. i think all that did was rally support— i think all that did was rally support - _ i think all that did was rally support — a few minutes in, it was
10:39 pm
quite _ support — a few minutes in, it was quite a _ support — a few minutes in, it was quite a flat— support — a few minutes in, it was quite a flat mood and there, but as soon _ quite a flat mood and there, but as soon as the — quite a flat mood and there, but as soon as the protesters started kickihq — soon as the protesters started kicking off, the crowd kind of got round _ kicking off, the crowd kind of got round the — kicking off, the crowd kind of got round the prime minister. so that actually— round the prime minister. so that actually worked to her benefit, realty — actually worked to her benefit, realty so _ actually worked to her benefit, really. so i think she lives to fight — really. so i think she lives to fight another day, it stabilised thihqs— fight another day, it stabilised things for today, but there are lots of tricky— things for today, but there are lots of tricky times ahead.— of tricky times ahead. sam, you've answered the _ of tricky times ahead. sam, you've answered the question, _ of tricky times ahead. sam, you've answered the question, i'll - of tricky times ahead. sam, you've answered the question, i'll come l answered the question, i'll come back to you, lucy, before we move on to the i which talks about the growing cabinet rebellion. do you think she said enough for it to cut through to the public to secure her position? i mean the polls are pretty dire. position? i mean the polls are pretty dire-— pretty dire. the polling is atrocious, _ pretty dire. the polling is atrocious, and _ pretty dire. the polling is atrocious, and her- pretty dire. the polling is atrocious, and her own i pretty dire. the polling is - atrocious, and her own personal polling is arguablyjust as bad as jeremy corbyn�*s was at his nadir. the problem is she wasn't necessarily focused on speaking to the nation, it was very much about, as sam said, trying to get the party
10:40 pm
back together again and reminding them— she kept talking about "my friends," that's how she kept describing those in the concert hall. so it seemed specifically pitched at her party members, and in particular the mps and activists in the hall. so on that score, she probably did do it enough to get a certain amount of support, although as you say, they are talking about this growing rebellion. but i don't really think that it was pitched correctly, if it was meant to speak to the general public, because there were only a couple of sound bites that were really intended for a wider audience. that were really intended for a wideraudience. bearing in mind most people won't have tuned in life to this speech, they won't have been going to their tv sets and radio sets at noon to hear it. so they'll have picked up some sound bites on
10:41 pm
news bulletins. so in orderfor that message to land more widely, shall have to amplify that a little bit more. i don't think she was speaking to the nation today.— more. i don't think she was speaking to the nation today. sam, as we have brou:ht to the nation today. sam, as we have brought the — to the nation today. sam, as we have brought the i — to the nation today. sam, as we have brought the i up _ to the nation today. sam, as we have brought the i up for _ to the nation today. sam, as we have brought the i up for the _ to the nation today. sam, as we have brought the i up for the viewers - to the nation today. sam, as we have brought the i up for the viewers to i brought the i up for the viewers to see their — this is about discipline, isn't it? she needs to get those backbenchers into line. yes, and i think party conferences are always — yes, and i think party conferences are always incredibly —— there's steep _ are always incredibly —— there's sleep deprived people, people with hangovers who don't think sensibly. you always— hangovers who don't think sensibly. you always have one big figure on the fringe — you always have one big figure on the fringe making trouble. in the past, _ the fringe making trouble. in the past, that— the fringe making trouble. in the past, that was borisjohnson before he became — past, that was borisjohnson before he became prime minister, he was the bil he became prime minister, he was the big attraction on the fringes, jacob rees—mogg was also a big star attraction for the cabinet. this year— attraction for the cabinet. this year it— attraction for the cabinet. this year it was— attraction for the cabinet. this year it was michael gove, supporting mischief _ year it was michael gove, supporting mischief ih— year it was michael gove, supporting mischief. in a way, it was a problem. _ mischief. in a way, it was a problem, it obviously forced a rethink— problem, it obviously forced a rethink about the 45p — but the
10:42 pm
bigger— rethink about the 45p — but the bigger problem is the cabinet itself, — bigger problem is the cabinet itself, when you have cabinet ministers _ itself, when you have cabinet ministers speaking out publicly about — ministers speaking out publicly about their views on policy that are clearly _ about their views on policy that are clearly a _ about their views on policy that are clearly a different position to the pm, clearly a different position to the pm. and — clearly a different position to the pm, and that is a problem. probably taikihg _ pm, and that is a problem. probably talking to _ pm, and that is a problem. probably talking to the cabinet minister the last few— talking to the cabinet minister the last few days, i've just never heard such potty — last few days, i've just never heard such potty mouths, there's been an incredible _ such potty mouths, there's been an incredible amount of frustration, full of— incredible amount of frustration, full of words i won't be able to say tonight, _ full of words i won't be able to say tonight, used to describe their frustrations with a cabinet talking out in _ frustrations with a cabinet talking out in public and making things worse — out in public and making things worse. they really want people to think— worse. they really want people to think about the big picture here. it's think about the big picture here. it's one — think about the big picture here. it's one thing for backbenchers to be sounding off, that's what they do, be sounding off, that's what they do. but _ be sounding off, that's what they do. but for— be sounding off, that's what they do, but for members of the cabinet to be _ do, but for members of the cabinet to be doing — do, but for members of the cabinet to be doing that is unhelpful to say the least — to be doing that is unhelpful to say the least. . , ., the least. lucy, turning to the front page _ the least. lucy, turning to the front page of _ the least. lucy, turning to the front page of the _ the least. lucy, turning to the front page of the daily - the least. lucy, turning to the - front page of the daily telegraph, turning to the bottom of the front
10:43 pm
page, "mortgage rates hit a 14 year high, 6%." the bills are going up at christmas, markets are still unhappy and facing uncertainty? yes. christmas, markets are still unhappy and facing uncertainty?— and facing uncertainty? yes, an interesting _ and facing uncertainty? yes, an interesting word _ and facing uncertainty? yes, an interesting word used _ and facing uncertainty? yes, an interesting word used a - and facing uncertainty? yes, an interesting word used a lot - and facing uncertainty? yes, an interesting word used a lot by l and facing uncertainty? yes, an. interesting word used a lot by liz truss in her speech today was disruption. if there's one thing we could use to describe what's been happening in the markets overall since kwasi kwarteng's many budget that was a mini budget, it's the fact that the markets particular have been disrupted. so it's not even the fact that people currently on mortgages are facing higher bills every month, it's that people who were trying to get mortgages have had those mortgages withdrawn or certain products have been withdrawn by some of the lenders. so the message that disruption is good and change is good, which was one of the overarching themes of liz truss's speech, will never land well with a core voter base for the conservative
10:44 pm
party. so in 2019, for example, the conservatives led labour by 10% in the field of voters who had a mortgage. so the fact that the markets are really volatile and the lenders are just sitting on their hands at the moment because they don't know which way the wind is blowing — although as the telegraph highlights, it does only appear to be going one way at the moment, just over 6% — this actually will hit a really core section of the conservative voter base then you would've thought: the last thing conservatives want to do is alienate such people. conservatives want to do is alienate such people-— such people. staying on the front .ae. such people. staying on the front -a~e of such people. staying on the front page of the _ such people. staying on the front page of the daily _ such people. staying on the front page of the daily telegraph, - such people. staying on the front| page of the daily telegraph, let's turn to ukraine in a reversal of gains for russia.— gains for russia. this is an intelligence assessment i gains for russia. this is an intelligence assessment of gains for russia. this is an - intelligence assessment of where things— intelligence assessment of where things are, and there are suggestions that actually, the stalling — suggestions that actually, the stalling of the russian assault, if
10:45 pm
that continues at the rate it currently _ that continues at the rate it currently is, and there is a potential— currently is, and there is a potential for ukraine to retake crimea — potential for ukraine to retake crimea - — potential for ukraine to retake crimea — obviously these are deeply complicated issues, we are going into winter— complicated issues, we are going into winter now, that's always a time _ into winter now, that's always a time of— into winter now, that's always a time of retreat anyway, essentially allowing _ time of retreat anyway, essentially allowing russia to regroup a little bit. allowing russia to regroup a little bit so _ allowing russia to regroup a little bit so it's — allowing russia to regroup a little bit. so it's interesting to see how this will— bit. so it's interesting to see how this will develop, but also it is a glimmer— this will develop, but also it is a glimmer of— this will develop, but also it is a glimmer of hope in this long war of attrition, _ glimmer of hope in this long war of attrition, that hopefully that and might— attrition, that hopefully that and might be — attrition, that hopefully that and might be in sight.— attrition, that hopefully that and might be in sight. financial times, lu , and might be in sight. financial times, lucy. and we _ might be in sight. financial times, lucy, and we continue _ might be in sight. financial times, lucy, and we continue with - might be in sight. financial times, lucy, and we continue with the - lucy, and we continue with the fallout of the budget that wasn't. yes, goldman sachs is one of several investors looking to swoop on cutprice prize assets from the uk pension fund. so what you've got is pension fund. so what you've got is pension funds looking to raise cash after last week's crisis. the
93 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
BBC News Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on