“p up to accompanied by gusts of wind up to 70 mph and that will drive steadily eastwards over the next few hours. a lot of heavy rain and a short space of time, it might lead to some localised flooding in one or two spots and certainly it's going to be moving at quite a pace as those strong, squally winds push it through. that's probably welcome news in some respects because it means by dawn it will be sitting out in the north sea and behind it, quite a clearance point a mile to start as well, double figures for many and we start tomorrow with maybe a bit more sunshine than today. but the strong winds stay with us and they will drive in plenty of showers from the west, some pushing further inland as we go through the afternoon. a blustery day, sharp showers, heavy and thundery as well with those strong winds rattling through quickly. top temperatures tomorrow at 11—15 , still relatively mild for the time

of year. high pressure will build towards the end of the week and sit across europe and that will be important as it will dry up things, keep those weather fronts out to the north west but still the southerly flow driving in the milder air. we are likely to see temperatures peaking at around 17 degrees on thursday. look at where they should be this time of year. it will stay mild despite the cloud and wind and rain. thanks, louise. and that's bbc news at ten on monday the 7th of november. there's more analysis of the day's main stories on newsnight which isjust getting underway on bbc two. it is my colleague victoria derbyshire who is just preparing to go on air. the news continues here on bbc one as now it's time to join our colleagues across the nations and regions for the news where you are, but from the ten team, it's goodnight.

hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are rachel cunliffe, the deputy 0nline editor at the new statesman, and ali miraj, who's a columnist for the article. the metro leads on rishi sunak�*s debut on the world stage at the climate conference in egypt where he made a short speech, and features a photo of a warm embrace between the prime minister and french president, emmanuel macron. the guardian has a powerful lead story from cop with the prime minister of barbados condemning richer countries for failing the developing world. also leading on cop, the i reports on the un secretary—general�*s grave warning that we are on a "highway to climate

hell" as experts predict a 2.8c global temperature rise by the year 2100. the ft splashes on the upcoming autumn statement — with reports the chancellor will carry out what the paper calls a "stealth raid" on inheritance tax. more on that during the course of this revealed. welcome to you both. thank you very much for being with us. rachel, let's start with the story striving for a combination of powerful image and headline, a number of key points. what do you make of its front page tomorrow morning? it’s make of its front page tomorrow mornin: ? �* , , morning? it's quite terrifying, isn't to? this _ morning? it's quite terrifying, isn't to? this is _ morning? it's quite terrifying, isn't to? this is the _ morning? it's quite terrifying, isn't to? this is the head - morning? it's quite terrifying, isn't to? this is the head of i morning? it's quite terrifying, l isn't to? this is the head of the morning? it's quite terrifying, - isn't to? this is the head of the un warning that we are on the highway to climate hell, saying that it is cooperation or parish. really, that

does seem to be the tone of this year's, 27 conference in egypt. the key thing we talked about today was that idea of climate reparation which we might get onto a bit later, this idea that wealthier countries should give money to poor countries that are bearing the brunt of climate change in the form of natural disasters. also there were speeches from not one but two high—profile british political figures, borisjohnson and then rishi sunak gave a short speech as well. so there is a kind of british angle here saying week hosted in glasgow last year, it is very much pricejohnson�*s baby, and i think notable that we are seeing the former prime minister —— off to egypt to take this high—profile role on the world stage. the egypt to take this high-profile role on the world stage.— on the world stage. the image chosen

on the world stage. the image - chosen of _ on the world stage. the image - chosen of the - on the world stage. the image - chosen of the planet, l on the world stage. the image - - chosen of the planet, which they've chosen of the planet, which they've chosen of the planet, which they superimpose the temperature increases to give us an idea of how woefully far off we are if the projections are accurate in terms of preventing the global change. it's an effective way of presenting it. it kind of feels like the argument hasn't moved that although in the years since glasgow.— hasn't moved that although in the years since glasgow. well, look, i think peeple _ years since glasgow. well, look, i think people out _ years since glasgow. well, look, i think people out there _ years since glasgow. well, look, i think people out there are - years since glasgow. well, look, i think people out there are gettingj think people out there are getting tired of— think people out there are getting tired of the they went to see the nationally— tired of the they went to see the nationally determined contributions from governments actually committed to and _ from governments actually committed to and delivered. the big elephant in the _ to and delivered. the big elephant in the room, as was the case last term, _ in the room, as was the case last term, all— in the room, as was the case last term, all that effort and almost broke _ term, all that effort and almost broke down in tears at the end of it was that_ broke down in tears at the end of it was that india and china are going to he _ was that india and china are going to be part — was that india and china are going to be part of the solution. the problem — to be part of the solution. the problem is that they are going to be saying _ problem is that they are going to be saying to _ problem is that they are going to be saying to the western world, you industrialised for the last 200 years— industrialised for the last 200 years and now it is our turn and we are not going — years and now it is our turn and we are not going to sacrifice, we are going _ are not going to sacrifice, we are going to — are not going to sacrifice, we are going to sacrifice our development

on the _ going to sacrifice our development on the back of carbon emissions. and that is_ on the back of carbon emissions. and that is a _ on the back of carbon emissions. and that is a real— on the back of carbon emissions. and that is a real problem because they are industrialising very fast, to be fair to— are industrialising very fast, to be fairto china, it are industrialising very fast, to be fair to china, it is producing a lot in the _ fair to china, it is producing a lot in the renewable space commits a big exporter— in the renewable space commits a big exporter of— in the renewable space commits a big exporter of renewable power now in terms _ exporter of renewable power now in terms of _ exporter of renewable power now in terms of its — exporter of renewable power now in terms of its know— how. but countries need _ terms of its know— how. but countries need to _ terms of its know— how. but countries need to do _ terms of its know— how. but countries need to do more, they need to go faster _ need to do more, they need to go faster but — need to do more, they need to go faster. but you need to solve the energy— faster. but you need to solve the energy dilemma. you need to balance cost, carbon— energy dilemma. you need to balance cost, carbon emissions from energy production— cost, carbon emissions from energy production and also energy security, and that— production and also energy security, and that energy security issue has been _ and that energy security issue has been poured into stark relief by the war in_ been poured into stark relief by the war in ukraine. we are now potentially looking at demand management issues, there was talk a few weeks— management issues, there was talk a few weeks ago blackouts that seems to have _ few weeks ago blackouts that seems to have dissipated now and it looks rishi sunak will be doing like rishi sunak will be doing a deal— like rishi sunak will be doing a deal with— like rishi sunak will be doing a deal with the us on importing liquefied natural gas, shale gas from _ liquefied natural gas, shale gas from the — liquefied natural gas, shale gas from the us. you need to solve these conundrums — from the us. you need to solve these conundrums. i do understand why people _ conundrums. i do understand why peorrie are — conundrums. i do understand why people are catastrophize and getting an-ry people are catastrophize and getting angry about the issue. i also

understand that it needs to be managed and you need to be mindful of your— managed and you need to be mindful of your security, particularly when it comes _ of your security, particularly when it comes to— of your security, particularly when it comes to the issue of dealing with baseload and i think with baseload power and i think that's— with baseload power and i think that's why it's important the government is taking charge of the nuclear— government is taking charge of the nuclear issue at size 12 c, which at the moment, i don't think has been shelled, _ the moment, idon't think has been shelled, but— the moment, i don't think has been shelled, but we will see what happens _ shelled, but we will see what happens on that november 17 statement. at happens on that november 17 statement-— happens on that november 17 statement. �* , ., , ., , statement. at the ft story on this kind of picks _ statement. at the ft story on this kind of picks up — statement. at the ft story on this kind of picks up on _ statement. at the ft story on this kind of picks up on the _ statement. at the ft story on this kind of picks up on the point - statement. at the ft story on this kind of picks up on the point you | kind of picks up on the point you are making about the impact of the ukraine war with emanuel background saying in his speech that the ukraine war should not change plans to limit global warning. in other words, the fear amongst some is it's a brilliant excuse for some to not do what they would otherwise do, although but might feel pressured to do. i although but might feel pressured to do. ~ , . although but might feel pressured to do. ~' , ., ., . ., do. i think the german chancellor when the tanks _ do. i think the german chancellor when the tanks rolled _ do. i think the german chancellor when the tanks rolled into - do. i think the german chancellor| when the tanks rolled into ukraine on february the 24th said a changing

events— on february the 24th said a changing events not— on february the 24th said a changing events not only for his country, but for your— events not only for his country, but for your more generally, and you can never— for your more generally, and you can never waste — for your more generally, and you can never waste a crisis. this is a chance — never waste a crisis. this is a chance entity carbon is much quicker than european countries were before. this has— than european countries were before. this has been a real pic of the —— he kicked — this has been a real pic of the —— he kicked up— this has been a real pic of the —— he kicked up the backside, a wake—up call, for— he kicked up the backside, a wake—up call, for countries who have been reliant— call, for countries who have been reliant on— call, for countries who have been reliant on russian gas are far too tom} _ reliant on russian gas are far too tom} we — reliant on russian gas are far too long. we also need to be sensible in the interim — long. we also need to be sensible in the interim period that gas, and a lot of people have these on gas, but i lot of people have these on gas, but i was _ lot of people have these on gas, but i was hearing from professor from oxford. _ i was hearing from professor from oxford. an— i was hearing from professor from oxford, an energy expert in this area _ oxford, an energy expert in this area saying, look, you might not like to— area saying, look, you might not like to but — area saying, look, you might not like to but it's going to have to be part of— like to but it's going to have to be part of the — like to but it's going to have to be part of the solution at least for the coming decade until you solve the coming decade until you solve the issue — the coming decade until you solve the issue of baseload power, which i can he _ the issue of baseload power, which i can be two ways, either through nuclear or— can be two ways, either through nuclear or through battery storage

when _ nuclear or through battery storage when you — nuclear or through battery storage when you actually store energy that's — when you actually store energy that's produced by renewables, wind and solar, _ that's produced by renewables, wind and solar, etc, but until he saw that— and solar, etc, but until he saw that conundrum, you are still going to have _ that conundrum, you are still going to have to— that conundrum, you are still going to have to use gas, that is much cleaner— to have to use gas, that is much cleaner than using coal or oil. i think— cleaner than using coal or oil. i think that's _ cleaner than using coal or oil. i think that's where we are. we need to he _ think that's where we are. we need to be pragmatic about it, but certainly— to be pragmatic about it, but certainly i do understand the frustration that i share and feel myself— frustration that i share and feel myself that we do need to do more. the ft_ myself that we do need to do more. the ft article also makes reference to the problem that antonio guterres spoke about in his speech, a country should make an extra effort to cut emissions, he and the building of coal plants. remember that moment a year ago when the hole was almost derailed at the last minute. india objected to the language that talked about the elimination of the call. it was the reduction that was agreed in the language of the text. it has a potentially significant impact on what some countries who have relied on call for many decades and still need call, not eliminating it in the

timescale that campaigners are pressing for. it’s timescale that campaigners are pressing for-— timescale that campaigners are pressing for. it's such a delicate balancin: pressing for. it's such a delicate balancing act. — pressing for. it's such a delicate balancing act, isn't _ pressing for. it's such a delicate balancing act, isn't it? - pressing for. it's such a delicate balancing act, isn't it? he - pressing for. it's such a delicate balancing act, isn't it? he went| pressing for. it's such a delicate l balancing act, isn't it? he went to get the language strong coming want to make both commitments and such bold targets you have to get them around the negotiating table in the first place. particularly china and india have very strong views on their own development and their own industrialisation, and just getting them to a place that's part of the battle, it's worth working out that he isn't going to egypt mother china will send a delegation, the premonition of india isn't going, the prime minister of australia, a good coal producing nation, the prime minister of canada isn't going getting those negotiations

either. getting those negotiations started but you have to be ambitious and pragmatic. i did think there were in ukraine has done to change the framing of this debate is i think it has i say this quite cautiously but it has made all sides at least see that the benefit in being pragmatic and understanding that isn't an ideal solution, maybe we would all love to switch to entirely clean solar and tidal power and wind energy overnight, 0k, we can't do that. what is the next? is the next best thing that we what is the next best thing that we can do, what's better than using, say, cauliflower —— coal powered plants which are incredibly polluting. i think a lot of the conversations about nuclear have got a lot more realistic and pragmatic. conversations of people not liking onshore wind, but maybe they would like it more if it was a question of onshore wind versus not having power and having blackouts over the winter. although, actually the polling shows the public seems to like onshore wind more than the

conservative party does. all of these things tie into how the debate is progressing. it is incredibly watching what seems to demoralising watching what seems to be a repeat of the greatest hits, the lines that we been hearing you can see progress inching very slowly forward. is it to moving fast enough? i think a lot of people were really quite worried that it isn't. will right, let's move the front page of express. the advantage page of the express. the advantage of going is that it's an opportunity for rishi sunak who is known internationally as his role in the finance minister, but nonetheless, he needs to build personal relations. here he is on the front of express, rather of the daily express, rather enthusiastic meeting between the two of them, which is sort of surprising looking at the rhetoric from both sides over the last year to 18 months. i

sides over the last year to 18 months. ~ �* , sides over the last year to 18 months. ,, �* , ,., ., ., months. i think it's important that rishi sunak. .. _ months. i think it's important that rishi sunak. .. not _ months. i think it's important that rishi sunak. .. not only _ months. i think it's important that rishi sunak. .. not only because . months. i think it's important that| rishi sunak. .. not only because of rishi sunak... not only because of the climate — rishi sunak... not only because of the climate issue that just the climate issue that we've just been _ the climate issue that we've just been talking about, that's important, but also because he needs to form _ important, but also because he needs to form those bonds. i know he's got a 620 _ to form those bonds. i know he's got a 620 or— to form those bonds. i know he's got a 620 or summit up soon, = -:z _li - other meetings cming i - other meetings cming up ==zz this issue with 77 this issue with the z soon. this issue with the french needs— soon. this issue with the french needs to — soon. this issue with the french needs to be resolved. his predecessor was only imposed �*a predecessor was only imposed fora matter— predecessor was only imposed fora matter of— predecessor was only imposed for a matter of days during that tory leadership hustings was saying when asked _ leadership hustings was saying when asked the _ leadership hustings was saying when asked the question is emanuel mack a friend _ asked the question is emanuel mack a friend or— asked the question is emanuel mack a friend or foe? the jury is out. this is fine _ friend or foe? the jury is out. this is fine if— friend or foe? the jury is out. this is fine if you — friend or foe? the jury is out. this is fine if you foreign is fine if you are foreign secretary before, _ is fine if you are foreign secretary before, chief diplomat of the uk, using _ before, chief diplomat of the uk, using that — before, chief diplomat of the uk, using that kind of language, particularly when you have a huge issue _ particularly when you have a huge issue with — particularly when you have a huge issue with 40,000 people come into the country— issue with 40,000 people come into the country abusing the normal systems— the country abusing the normal systems and you need cooperation with french to try to close that

= -= paid to the french, - paid to the french, hasn't. down. paid to the french, hasn't worked, — down. paid to the french, hasn't worked, nothing happened, at least rishi sunak is engaging in a meaningful manner. inching towards :|-=: :=: 'oint patrols happen. we progress, joint patrols happen. we do need _ progress, joint patrols happen. we do need allies in this fight, when it comes — do need allies in this fight, when it comes to— do need allies in this fight, when it comes to the migration crisis it is a europe—wide problem, more and more _ is a europe—wide problem, more and more people — is a europe—wide problem, more and more people are being displaced by more pepple are being displace and more people are being displaced’py -m_ more people are being displaced’by - and also by more people are being displaced by �*and also by geopolitical issues war and also by geopolitical issues but also _ war and also by geopolitical issues but also going to do in the future as the _ but also going to do in the future as the pm — but also going to do in the future as the pm of barbados was saying by climate _ as the pm of barbados was saying by climate change.— climate change. rachel, the migration — climate change. rachel, the migration observatory - climate change. rachel, the migration observatory was l climate change. rachel, the - migration observatory was writing in the ft at the weekend rishi sunak committed to the 2019 manifesto the fifth prime minister to promise to bring down next migration to the tens of thousands, a pledge that was made by david cameron which feels

like a lifetime ago now. in a sense can be have to be very cautious about you promising to the about you promising to solve the migrant crisis, don't you? let's face it, there are four of your predecessors who said much the same and didn't. you predecessors who said much the same and didn't. ., ., ., , and didn't. you have to be particularly _ and didn't. you have to be particularly careful- and didn't. you have to be particularly careful about i and didn't. you have to be i particularly careful about the and didn't. you have to be - particularly careful about the tens of thousands figure because that was actually a mistake that was made by minister i believe damien greene who was asked how much are you going to limit it by and plucked a number out of thin airwith limit it by and plucked a number out of thin air with no idea of the context of how many people were �* many people it would be coming, how many people it would be desirable to have come. so this number has kind of stuck in people's mines as a target when actually it was a mistake. that's a lesson to ministers not to make up data in live interviews. it has really been the albatross around the neck of the various conservative governments. i think it's really, really important that you separate out two very different issues. how many people do we want coming here? what kinds of

people do we want to?