oh, you sexy beast. the actor leslie phillips, who's died at the age of 98. time for a look at the weather. here's louise lear. good evening, if you can open the curtains before going to bed, you might get a glimpse of the amazing full moon at the moment. clear skies for some but not all, we still have a few scattered showers around, most of them to the far north and west and they will tend to linger going through the night along that south coast. but we keep clearer skies, the wind direction changing a little in the last day and that will allow temperatures to cool down to single figures. a bit more chilly first thing tomorrow and hopefully a bit

drier as well put the lighter winds to begin with. those shows are lingering in the far south—east and a few scattered showers but the winds will ease in the afternoon across england and wales, the showers becoming few and far between. more persistent showers in the far north of scotland, still incredibly mild for this time of year, 11—15 through the middle of the afternoon. but milder still as high pressure pushes in and it will block these weather fronts that will sit in the far north—west. also, it will drag up this very warm air coming all the way from africa so over the next few days, milder still, can you believe? at this time of year, that south—westerly flow will drag a lot of cloud, some mist and drizzle on western coasts, some very heavy rain sitting in the northern and western isles accompanied by winds up to 70 mph but look at the temperatures,

11-17 , that is 63 but look at the temperatures, ii—i7 , that is 63 fahrenheit. warm by day but even warmer through the night. record november minimums looking around 15 or 16 degrees across the country but look at this, as we start friday morning, we maik twelsiek some record—breaking temperatures through the night, with the highest minimum is about record at —— we may well see record—breaking temperatures. thanks, louise. and that's bbc news at ten on tuesday the 8th of november. there's more analysis of the day's main stories on newsnight with victoria derbyshire which is just getting underway on bbc two. they will be talking about sir gavin williamson and his resignation. the news continues here on bbc one, as now it's time to join our colleagues across the nations and regions for the news where you are, but from the ten team, it's goodnight.

hello, welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are the broadcaster and psychotherapist, lucy beresford, and the former trade minister, lord digbyjones. tomorrow because my front pages, then. let's have a look. —— tomorrow's. the guardian leads on this evening's �*dramatic�* resignation of government minister sir gavin williamson, after allegations reported by the paper that williamson had told a senior civil service the daily mail the i also splashes on tonight's breaking news of the resignation of williamson, who is facing a bullying inquiry — citing claims he is a security risk. the metro also leads on the resignation of williamson, linking it with matt hancock's stint

in the jungle the express meanwhile credits the paper's own campaign to protect its readers�* pensions, reporting that sunak is likely to inflation—proof state pension rises in next week's autumn budget. discount supermarkets like aldi and lidl are anticipating record profits this christmas as shoppers hit by the cost of living crisis switch to cheaper food essentials, says city am. including christmas dinner. let us begin and start with the a news for paper. it leaves with gavin williamson's resignation. williamson resigns amid bullying and new security risk claims, and perhaps you're only a prime minister when you have a cabinet resignation on your hands. yes, although one wouldn't expect that this quickly. it's barely two weeks since rishi sunak stood outside number ten and spoke about the need for integrity and politics,

so it's in fort —— concurrently unfortunate that the person whose resigned is going because of some serious allegations of bullying. you talk about how the front pages had to be rewritten, but i think for the whole of today, the direction of travel about this story has really only been going in one direction, particularly when you think about the high political cost to keep gavin williamson and post. we have prime minister's questions tomorrow, the leader of the opposition was bounded to be asking questions about the story because it's really been what everyone has been talking about in the media and in political circles because the bullying was so explicit, the texts and whatsapp messages that had been released even before today were really quite shocking, really quite disgusting, and then we had a former chief whip

going on the record in an interview with channel 4 news tonight actually giving more details about gavin williamson's alleged behaviour. he of course denies any wrongdoing and wants to fight to clear his name. perhaps it could be said that the writing was notjust in the text and messages, but for gavin williamson, on the wall. it’s messages, but for gavin williamson, on the wall-— on the wall. it's a very interesting oint. on the wall. it's a very interesting point- the — on the wall. it's a very interesting point- the papers _ on the wall. it's a very interesting point. the papers were _ on the wall. it's a very interesting point. the papers were probably i point. the papers were probably preparing for this story anyway, and then the resignation slightly alter that. let's bring in the guardian. 0n the front page, there's a picture of gavin williamson in whitehall on monday. it has the quote, "unethical, immoral." i think it's a quote from the former deputy to gavin williamson. lord digbyjones, we know that she flips have to impose discipline, hence the word whip, but surely there is difference

between imposing and pulling good evenina. between imposing and pulling good evening- good _ between imposing and pulling good evening. good evening, lucy. i always— evening. good evening, lucy. i always look at this sort of resignation, and you mentioned this idea, _ resignation, and you mentioned this idea, will_ resignation, and you mentioned this idea, will you have to cope with resignation? but ministers, when they're _ resignation? but ministers, when they're up— resignation? but ministers, when they're up against it, need a reservoir_ they're up against it, need a reservoir of goodwill in either the cabinet _ reservoir of goodwill in either the cabinet and the party. where a prime minister_ cabinet and the party. where a prime minister looks and one to support or is that one to accept? and williamson has very little _ accept? and williamson has very little support. i should use the word _ little support. i should use the word allegedly, but does an awful lot the _ word allegedly, but does an awful lot the record. and also, lucy used the word _ lot the record. and also, lucy used the word disgusting, but i think she's_ the word disgusting, but i think she's absolutely right. some of the stuff he _ she's absolutely right. some of the stuff he is — she's absolutely right. some of the stuff he is alleged to have said and

done, _ stuff he is alleged to have said and done, you — stuff he is alleged to have said and done, you would find that in business. _ done, you would find that in business, you wouldn't find it in sport _ business, you wouldn't find it in sport it's — business, you wouldn't find it in sport. it's such explicit, you would find a _ sport. it's such explicit, you would find a degree of... some people would _ find a degree of... some people would call— find a degree of... some people would call it bullying, but you'd find that — would call it bullying, but you'd find that in pressurised environments. i do find it slightly rich when — environments. i do find it slightly rich when the chief whip is one of the people — rich when the chief whip is one of the people saying that she was hullied~ — the people saying that she was hullied~ i— the people saying that she was bullied. ithink the people saying that she was bullied. i think it's a sign of the times— bullied. i think it's a sign of the times because we are all... chief whip _ times because we are all... chief whip 's _ times because we are all... chief whip 's were the ultimate police. they were — whip 's were the ultimate police. they were paid to bully. these are legion— they were paid to bully. these are legion of— they were paid to bully. these are legion of blackmailing and the nasty stuff that _ legion of blackmailing and the nasty stuff that was done to get mps legion of blackmailing and the nasty stuff that was done to get mp5 of both parties to go into a particular lobby. _ both parties to go into a particular lobby. but — both parties to go into a particular lobby, but the world has changed and a man— lobby, but the world has changed and a man who _ lobby, but the world has changed and a man who keeps a tarantula on his desk, _ a man who keeps a tarantula on his desk, there — a man who keeps a tarantula on his desk, there are things to be asked. remember— desk, there are things to be asked.

remember what desk, there are things to be asked. rememberwhat i said desk, there are things to be asked. remember what i said — people when he was _ remember what i said — people when he was defence secretary didn't like him, he was defence secretary didn't like him. and _ he was defence secretary didn't like him, and that is one of the reasons in the _ him, and that is one of the reasons in the i_ him, and that is one of the reasons in the i that— him, and that is one of the reasons in the i that has been quoted. he could _ in the i that has been quoted. he could have — in the i that has been quoted. he could have been a security risk. he was a _ could have been a security risk. he was a chief— could have been a security risk. he was a chief whip himself. the guy didn't— was a chief whip himself. the guy didn't have — was a chief whip himself. the guy didn't have people saying this is someone — didn't have people saying this is someone they should get behind, sol think in— someone they should get behind, sol think in terms of flooding the prime minister— think in terms of flooding the prime minister with this, it's an easier one than— minister with this, it's an easier one than one he would have to face. by one than one he would have to face. by the _ one than one he would have to face. by the way, — one than one he would have to face. by the way, the leader opposition would give him a hard time, so he should _ would give him a hard time, so he should we — would give him a hard time, so he should. we are one of the very few countries _ should. we are one of the very few countries in — should. we are one of the very few countries in the world that pay an mp called — countries in the world that pay an mp called the leader of her majesty's opposition, and the job is to make _ majesty's opposition, and the job is to make life difficult for the prime minister — to make life difficult for the prime minister. that is precisely what he should _ minister. that is precisely what he should have done tomorrow. i suppose tonight, _ should have done tomorrow. i suppose tonight, it _ should have done tomorrow. i suppose tonight, it will rewrite keir

starmer's scripta.- tonight, it will rewrite keir starmer's scri ta. ., ., starmer's scripta. you mentioned hinterland interactional _ starmer's scripta. you mentioned hinterland interactional love. - starmer's scripta. you mentioned hinterland interactional love. it i hinterland interactional love. it slightly leaves us to the metro. took me ages to think of. it's a jungle out there. he's in, he's out. i'm notan of. it's a jungle out there. he's in, he's out. i'm not an expert on that particular programme. would we expect a late entry into the jungle with gavin williams and? you expect a late entry into the “ungle with gavin williams and? you think i'm an with gavin williams and? you think m an expert _ with gavin williams and? you think m an expert in — with gavin williams and? you think i'm an expert in this _ with gavin williams and? you think i'm an expert in this programme? l i'm an expert in this programme? laughter i am not to, but i can guess he probably won't be despite the fondness for creepy—crawly creatures. it is quite a clever front page because it is drawing attention to two members of parliament who are perhaps making people very dissatisfied with their behaviour, because matt hancock may behaviour, because matt hancock may be going into this incredibly popular but not by me watch

programme. it is causing a stir in his constituency, but within the wider mp fraternity, it's fair to say because people are saying mps should be in the house of commons doing thejob of should be in the house of commons doing the job of works as opposed to flaunting themselves around the world on a reality tv show. but it also begs the question, what life lies open to an mp when their career is perhaps over? i suppose gavin williamson is one of those mps where people were surprised at quite how many lives he appeared to have, because as digby was saying, he already scorned many people by losing hisjob. any parent in the country, if you mention the name gavin williamson, will basically laugh in yourface because he was such an unimpressive... it would be

fascinating to see what his next career move is, but matt hancock shines a light on the fact that it could be a life and reality tv. talking about politicians going to reality tv, there was one star who went to politics, who's now hoping that his party does quite well. let's look at the ft and the congressional votes. the financial times have printed this before any of the results are known. it goes with the neutral headline. digbyjones, it is a mark of history that which ever present as office, they usually get thumped, or shellacked, as barack 0bama said. your thought on this boat. l or shellacked, as barack 0bama said. your thought on this boat.— your thought on this boat. i thought our seuue your thought on this boat. i thought your segue into _ your thought on this boat. i thought your segue into this _ your thought on this boat. i thought your segue into this was _ your thought on this boat. i thought your segue into this was excellent. l your segue into this was excellent. i your segue into this was excellent. i would _ your segue into this was excellent. i would end, it would be lovely to see trump— i would end, it would be lovely to see trump in the jungle. i've never

seen _ see trump in the jungle. i've never seen the _ see trump in the jungle. i've never seen the programme, but ice... i suspect— seen the programme, but ice... i suspect he — seen the programme, but ice... i suspect he has earned this by getting — suspect he has earned this by getting more publicity. this is a newspaper review and if we're looking — newspaper review and if we're looking at this as a front page, i think— looking at this as a front page, i think the — looking at this as a front page, i think the ft has the most striking photograph on that front page, the silhouette of the presidentjogging past the _ silhouette of the presidentjogging past the capitol building with the stars _ past the capitol building with the stars lir— past the capitol building with the stars & stripes. i think that's extremely striking, catches the eyes and give _ extremely striking, catches the eyes and give the background to a very small— and give the background to a very small story, basically saying midterm elections. as you say, one of the _ midterm elections. as you say, one of the problems with the presidential system, and we often have been—

presidential system, and we often have been subliminally... we are a parliamentary democracy. in the local— parliamentary democracy. in the local mp — parliamentary democracy. in the local mp joins parliamentary democracy. in the local mpjoins with other parliamentary democracy. in the local mp joins with other mp5. but the french— local mp joins with other mp5. but the french and the americans both elect _ the french and the americans both elect a _ the french and the americans both elect a president directly, the problem _ elect a president directly, the problem is you can have a president. but you _ problem is you can have a president. but you can't— problem is you can have a president. but you can't get legislation through— but you can't get legislation through unless you got the senate. he can't— through unless you got the senate. he can't do— through unless you got the senate. he can't do it unless he's a real pork— he can't do it unless he's a real pork barrel— he can't do it unless he's a real pork barrel political, dark places president— pork barrel political, dark places president as lyndon johnson. pork barrel political, dark places president as lyndonjohnson. lbj president as lyndonjohnson. lbj deserves— president as lyndonjohnson. lbj deserves all the politics. —— plaudits~ _ deserves all the politics. —— plaudits. he did it by moving houses _ plaudits. he did it by moving houses. he plaudits. he did it by moving houses. ., , ,., plaudits. he did it by moving houses. ., , ., ., houses. he was sort of a chief whip of his day- — houses. he was sort of a chief whip of his day. probably _ houses. he was sort of a chief whip of his day. probably not _ houses. he was sort of a chief whip of his day. probably not with - houses. he was sort of a chief whip of his day. probably not with a -

of his day. probably not with a tarantula on _ of his day. probably not with a tarantula on his _ of his day. probably not with a tarantula on his desk. - of his day. probably not with a tarantula on his desk. and - of his day. probably not with a tarantula on his desk. and he | of his day. probably not with a - tarantula on his desk. and he was an education _ tarantula on his desk. and he was an education secretary either. —— he wasn't _ education secretary either. —— he wasn't. biden is looking at the nightmare of these two years because probably— nightmare of these two years because probably not the senate, it's 50—50 as we _ probably not the senate, it's 50—50 as we speak. the vice president is the speaker in the senate and it always— the speaker in the senate and it always goes democrat. house of representatives could go republican, and that— representatives could go republican, and that is— representatives could go republican, and that is what is so important about— and that is what is so important about tonight. and then we had the nightmare — about tonight. and then we had the nightmare for biden and one might argue _ nightmare for biden and one might argue he _ nightmare for biden and one might argue he is— nightmare for biden and one might argue he is divisive. you have the spectre _ argue he is divisive. you have the spectre of— argue he is divisive. you have the spectre of trump sitting there, saying. — spectre of trump sitting there, saying. "if— spectre of trump sitting there, saying, "if i see the republicans having _ saying, "if i see the republicans having a — saying, "if i see the republicans having a good show tonight, i might throw— having a good show tonight, i might throw my— having a good show tonight, i might throw my head in the ring for campaign." that will divide america. whilst _ campaign." that will divide america. whilst america