since monday, 258 millimetres fact, since monday, 258 millimetres of rain, a month's worth in a week. much drier this weekend, not as windy, too, as the wind drops, an increasing risk of seeing some mist and fog. in fact, for the rest of the night across much of wales and england, extensive low cloud around and very misty in places. some rain in southern scotland and north—west england, pushing north to the central belt and back north to northern ireland as we go through the rest of the night. it is cooler tonight, particularly across northern scotland, well done to single figures into east anglia as well, 6—7 in some spots but no one can say it is cold. we start with the rain continuing to move north through scotland tomorrow and lingering around the islands. it clears from northern ireland, may be drizzle following behind and a grey, misty start in wales and england but many places gradually brightening up. a touch cooler full scotland and northern ireland and northern england and for the rest of england and wales, 16—18. it could be foggy in places on remembrance sunday morning for some of the services and

some of that low cloud, mist and fog may linger through eastern scotland and north—east england. the breeze freshening in the west again with rain heading into northern ireland to end the day and on sunday for north—west england and north—west wales, temperatures could be as high as 19. next week, it will turn cooler and it will eventually start to feel like november should. thanks. and that's tonight's bbc news at ten. there's more analysis of the day's main stories on newsnight, which isjust getting under way on bbc two. the news continues here on bbc one, as now it's time to join our colleagues across the nations and regions for the news where you are. but from the ten team, it's goodnight. hello, welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow.

with me are the parliamentary journalist, tony grew, and anne mcelvoy, who's senior editor at the economist. thank you very much for giving up your friday night. let's get cracking with the papers we are ready have. leading the times tomorrow is the news that care home residents may get the legal right to receive visitors, as many homes still impose harsh covid restrictions. while the express reports on an "ambitious" proposal to have uk officers in france to prevent migrant crossings. on the front page of the i, rishi sunak delays his growth plan as the uk heads for recession. the ft reports on the collapse of one of the world's largest cryptocurrency platforms — ftx — as it files for bankruptcy in the us. "sorry isn't enough" — the mirror leads on the difficult questions matt hancock is facing from his campmates in the i'm a celebrityjungle.

of �*going woke' by donning a vest that mimics menopause symptoms. evening. we're going to start with the times, which has the story on care homes. it's the story that when i first read care homes. it's the story that when ifirst read it, i couldn't believe these restrictions were still in place, just focus throughout. this place, “ust focus throughout. this is place, just focus throughout. this is helen wheatley, _ place, just focus throughout. ti 3 is helen wheatley, which has returned to her position as care minister, a title well—chosen to show the recognition they need to be much more understood and delivered in terms of people's actual

experience of health care and social care services. this one is quite extraordinary. hundreds of care homes still not accepting visitors. and that is interesting because she had experience of this herself. she said she felt the system was inhuman. of course care homes are normally feeling from both ends and that they are getting criticised and they can't take unnecessary risks, but there's always a sense that it's very hard to take restrictions off when they are embedded. nobody wants to be the ones to do that. she says they're going to have to do this. these new rules that will potentially come into place, in june, and hejust leaders told hospitals that they have to return to those pre—pandemic, tony, rules.

i guess when we read in this article in particular that in some care homes, even phone calls were stopped because of this concern that the virus could spread. i guess there's this question mark about the most vulnerable in our society being forgotten about.— vulnerable in our society being forgotten about. obviously, it's reall bad forgotten about. obviously, it's really bad for _ forgotten about. obviously, it's really bad for residents - forgotten about. obviously, it's really bad for residents in - forgotten about. obviously, it's really bad for residents in care | really bad for residents in care homes — really bad for residents in care homes to— really bad for residents in care homes to be denied contact. over 80% of care _ homes to be denied contact. over 80% of care home _ homes to be denied contact. over 80% of care home beds in england are run by private _ of care home beds in england are run by private companies. this is not like the — by private companies. this is not like the nhs. the vast majority of beds _ like the nhs. the vast majority of beds are — like the nhs. the vast majority of beds are run by for—profit companies, so the government is limited~ _ companies, so the government is limited. they change the name of the department, but it is worth parting out that— department, but it is worth parting out that the majority isn't provided

by the _ out that the majority isn't provided by the nhs or public sector, it's the private sector. my concern would be that _ the private sector. my concern would be that those hair, —— care homes are being — be that those hair, —— care homes are being run_ be that those hair, —— care homes are being run and having a tough time _ are being run and having a tough time but— are being run and having a tough time. but the concern is that some of the _ time. but the concern is that some of the care — time. but the concern is that some of the care homes are being run not for the benefit of those receiving the care — for the benefit of those receiving the care. it�*s for the benefit of those receiving the care. 3 . for the benefit of those receiving the care. �*, ., ., , . ., the care. it's a great piece of journalism to _ the care. it's a great piece of journalism to respond. - the care. it's a great piece of - journalism to respond. absolutely staggering. couldn't believe it when i read it. the daily express has the story with matt hancock on the front page. we're coming to him? definitely. i do not want _ we're coming to him? definitely. i do not want to _ we're coming to him? definitely. i do not want to disappoint - we're coming to him? definitely. i do not want to disappoint you. - we're coming to him? definitely. i j do not want to disappoint you. the uk presence in france to stop crossings. goes on to talk about how british and french officers are

going to be working together. that is obviously _ going to be working together. that is obviously if _ going to be working together. t�*isgit is obviously if there is something key to resolving the situation, both to those in small boats crossing the channel and seeking to claim asylum, but in many cases, not going to have asylum approved if it's illegal. at the same time, this is distressing on services and the affected parts of the country in terms of... i think this is the right solution. the daily express has been plugging away at the story. there is a deal in the making and it would involve officers having to work together not just across the channel, but a driver in the system to say once people have left one phillies, the authorities not so interested. ——

one place. i imagine a of a payback for the financial deal on the table. but it does look like happy days if it gets there because this is the kind of solutions you need for this story as well as... as they don't in france. ., ., , a , story as well as... as they don't in france. ., ., , , ., , france. you are picking up on this, i imagine them _ france. you are picking up on this, i imagine them working _ france. you are picking up on this, i imagine them working together, l france. you are picking up on this, i i imagine them working together, but inside the paper, the express has got this comment from tony smith, your namesake, a former border force cheap, hooves always says they've always enjoyed our working relationship with the french border police —— borderforce chief. why on a political level as well? police -- border force chief. why on a political level as well?— a political level as well? that's robabl a political level as well? that's probably a _ a political level as well? that's probably a question _ a political level as well? that's probably a question to - a political level as well? that's probably a question to ask - a political level as well? that's probably a question to ask the | a political level as well? that's - probably a question to ask the daily express, _ probably a question to ask the daily express, who never miss the opportunity to produce a fantastical headline _ opportunity to produce a fantastical headline. look, france has been doing— headline. look, france has been

doing quite— headline. look, france has been doing quite a bit in terms of trying to deter— doing quite a bit in terms of trying to deter these crossings, but this proposal— to deter these crossings, but this proposal will only involve 50 border force staff — proposal will only involve 50 border force staff operating in france, and that's— force staff operating in france, and that's clearly insufficient. there's actually _ that's clearly insufficient. there's actually a — that's clearly insufficient. there's actually a relief simple way to deal with this, — actually a relief simple way to deal with this, to process asylum applications in france. therefore they will— applications in france. therefore they will need to cross the channel to make _ they will need to cross the channel to make an— they will need to cross the channel to make an application. but that doesn't — to make an application. but that doesn't appear to be part of this new arrangement that they've made with france. i would also point out that 80% — with france. i would also point out that 80% of people do come to this coumry— that 80% of people do come to this country successful in asylum claims, so of— country successful in asylum claims, so of make _ country successful in asylum claims, so of make sense to me to think about— so of make sense to me to think about changing the place in which people _ about changing the place in which people can apply for asylum in the uk rather— people can apply for asylum in the uk rather than people can apply for asylum in the uk ratherthan sending people can apply for asylum in the uk rather than sending some border force people over there to assist the french. force people over there to assist the french-— force people over there to assist the french. �* ., ., ., ., the french. before i move on from this, the french. before i move on from this. even — the french. before i move on from this, even listening _ the french. before i move on from this, even listening so _ the french. before i move on from this, even listening so much - the french. before i move on from this, even listening so much aboutj this, even listening so much about these crossings, but ijust want to pick up on what suella braverman is

being quoted on saying in terms of the bids to bring in troops, can you elaborate on what is written here? i think that is bringing out... it sounds like the big guns and solutions. that is than the role that the armed forces play and have played before. the government of all types and colours. i think suella braverman is never backwards and coming forward at the hotter end of the solutions, and i think in this case, bring the troops to shore up if there were to be a strike of any sale, would probably be intended to more reassure voters. it also

includes rishi sunak, who said she was rather high—profile and not always in a great way, but the rest of the bubble of out of touch with a lot of people in the country.- lot of people in the country. anne, thank ou lot of people in the country. anne, thank you for— lot of people in the country. anne, thank you for talking _ lot of people in the country. anne, thank you for talking us _ lot of people in the country. anne, thank you for talking us through i thank you for talking us through that. you talk about the bubbles, the potential bubble bursting in the crypto world. this is an exchange cryptocurrency group that's just been an absolute collapse. it's —— its founder has resigned. talk us through the angle that the fd has today. i through the angle that the fd has toda . ., �* through the angle that the fd has toda. .,�* , ., today. i don't exactly have the details, but — today. i don't exactly have the details, but i _ today. i don't exactly have the details, but i don't _ today. i don't exactly have the details, but i don't really - details, but i don't really understand cryptocurrency. it doesn't — understand cryptocurrency. it doesn't appear to be very stable. it doesn't _ doesn't appear to be very stable. it doesn't come much as a surprise to me that _ doesn't come much as a surprise to me that this— doesn't come much as a surprise to me that this guy, who's been talking about— me that this guy, who's been talking about how— me that this guy, who's been talking about how rich he is and donating money— about how rich he is and donating money to— about how rich he is and donating

money to the democrats and being this big _ money to the democrats and being this big figure, turns out... i'm not an— this big figure, turns out... i'm not an expert, so maybe i have nothing — not an expert, so maybe i have nothing to— not an expert, so maybe i have nothing to say about this. anne, i cuess it's nothing to say about this. anne, i guess it's the _ nothing to say about this. anne, i guess it's the whole _ nothing to say about this. anne, i guess it's the whole point - nothing to say about this. anne, i guess it's the whole point that. nothing to say about this. anne, i | guess it's the whole point that this was something that was built up. at £32 billion —— dollars, and it's all just falling apart. the £32 billion -- dollars, and it's all just falling apart.— just falling apart. the bigger cuestion just falling apart. the bigger question is _ just falling apart. the bigger question is whether - just falling apart. the bigger question is whether it's - just falling apart. the bigger question is whether it's the l just falling apart. the bigger i question is whether it's the end of crypto as such, or whether this is one of those bubbles massively overvalued, etc. so, i kind of deals with whatever it's trading and exchanging. it's not quite the same as saying crypto or any form of cryptocurrency is over. further, i'm happy if it would never have been speculative on bitcoin. i think what's more interesting here is not

so much this one big collapse, but how does this whole bit of crypto counting, how does it reset? stock exchanges did go bust after of their history. they in terms of cryptocurrency? —— is there something there? exchange has gone down. . �* , something there? exchange has gone down. . v . something there? exchange has gone down. ., �*, ., ., , down. that's a really good point. do we learn from _ down. that's a really good point. do we learn from the _ down. that's a really good point. do we learn from the lessons _ down. that's a really good point. do we learn from the lessons of - we learn from the lessons of history? exactly. at the moment, ask things like not. the i. -- it —— it seems like. we want to focus on gary lineker. who is speaking out about the world cup, although he is going to be attending. it's a difficult one, is in it. ., , �* , .,

in it. no, it isn't, we should be iuanorin in it. no, it isn't, we should be ignoring the — in it. no, it isn't, we should be ignoring the entire _ in it. no, it isn't, we should be ignoring the entire event i in it. no, it isn't, we should be ignoring the entire event and l ignoring the entire event and boycotting it. but the fa spend their— boycotting it. but the fa spend their time talking about how accepting they are of the lgbt community, yet when it comes to money— community, yet when it comes to money and — community, yet when it comes to money and losing money, it's completely different story. i don't understand why gary lineker is at the front— understand why gary lineker is at the front page saying "we talked about _ the front page saying "we talked about boycotting," then not boycotting, so theyjust talked about — boycotting, so theyjust talked about it — boycotting, so theyjust talked about it. this is not something that the uk _ about it. this is not something that the uk should even be involved in. that should — the uk should even be involved in. that should have been made perfectly... it was won through bribery, — perfectly... it was won through bribery, apparently. it's almost comical— bribery, apparently. it's almost comical that a country like qatar is hosting _ comical that a country like qatar is hosting the — comical that a country like qatar is hosting the world cup. gary lineker is sa in: hosting the world cup. gary lineker is saying that _ hosting the world cup. gary lineker is saying that he — hosting the world cup. gary lineker is saying that he will _ hosting the world cup. gary lineker is saying that he will be _ hosting the world cup. gary lineker is saying that he will be involved i is saying that he will be involved in the actual draw —— he won't. what in the actual draw -- he won't. what a hue in the actual draw -- he won't. what a huge sack of... _

in the actual draw -- he won't. what a huge sack of... well _ in the actual draw -- he won't. what a huge sack of... well done, - in the actual draw —— he won't. what a huge sack of... well done, gary, very— a huge sack of... well done, gary, very impressed. a huge sack of... well done, gary, very impressed-— very impressed. what it comes to what ou very impressed. what it comes to what you are _ very impressed. what it comes to what you are suggesting, - very impressed. what it comes to what you are suggesting, this i what you are suggesting, this bribery accusation, what evidence, tony? because it's an accusation and that at the moment, talk us through the evidence. i that at the moment, talk us through the evidence-— the evidence. i don't have any evidence, which _ the evidence. i don't have any evidence, which is _ the evidence. i don't have any evidence, which is why - the evidence. i don't have any evidence, which is why i i the evidence. i don't have any evidence, which is why i said l the evidence. i don't have any| evidence, which is why i said it the evidence. i don't have any i evidence, which is why i said it was alleged _ evidence, which is why i said it was alleged it— evidence, which is why i said it was alleged it is— evidence, which is why i said it was alleged. it is quite strange that a country— alleged. it is quite strange that a country with no footballing history and no _ country with no footballing history and no apparent interest in football over the _ and no apparent interest in football over the past 20 years and suddenly managed _ over the past 20 years and suddenly managed to come into contact with fifa, who— managed to come into contact with fifa, who are notoriously corrupt, and just— fifa, who are notoriously corrupt, and just happened to have won that bid. and just happened to have won that bid l'm _ and just happened to have won that bid l'miust— and just happened to have won that bid. i'm just saying and just happened to have won that bid. i'mjust saying it and just happened to have won that bid. i'm just saying it seems fishy. i bid. i'm just saying it seems fishy. i don't _ bid. i'm just saying it seems fishy. i don't have — bid. i'm just saying it seems fishy. i don't have any evidence to present _ i don't have any evidence to present. but like i said, there have been _ present. but like i said, there have been significant allegations of bribery~ — been significant allegations of bribe . . ., , ., been significant allegations of bribe. . ., , ., ., bribery. there certainly have, and they involve _ bribery. there certainly have, and they involve the _ bribery. there certainly have, and they involve the fifa _ bribery. there certainly have, and they involve the fifa at _ bribery. there certainly have, and they involve the fifa at the - bribery. there certainly have, and they involve the fifa at the time, | they involve the fifa at the time, and in particular events. he

understood leaning on