this is bbc news, the headlines... in world cup football, england have been held to a goal—less draw with the united states, in their second world cup match in qatar. england started brightly, but the americans soon grew in confidence and were the better side for most of the game. the governor of kherson, in southern ukraine, says hospital patients are being evacuated because of constant russian shelling. he said some children had been taken to mykolaiv, 100 other patients were being moved to odesa. president vladimir putin has urged families of russian servicemen not to believe what they read online about the war. he made the comment during a televised meeting with a group of women described as mothers of service personnel. nurses in england, wales and northern ireland will walk out

on 15 and 20 december in a dispute over pay. it's the first time they've gone on strike. since their union was founded back in the 19th century. hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are the broadcaster and writerjemma forte, and joe mayes, uk politics reporter at bloomberg. just to bring you up—to—date with the front pages if you weren't with us an hour ago. "yawn in the usa!" the daily mirror leads on the 0—0 draw between england and the usa. the daily mail looks to the three lions�* next match against wales on tuesday, calling it the battle of britain. the ft leads on news that qatar is reviewing its investments in the uk after transport for london banned its ads on its buses,

taxis and trains. because of the controversy over its stance on lgbtq rights. tories fear mass exodus of mps before election — that's in the i. the guardian reports that disabled care home residents are being evicted because of disputes between leonard cheshire and local authorities. the daily express says parents are raiding their pension funds to help their children with the cost of living crisis. and an exclusive with the princess of wales in the daily telegraph who says not enough is being done to help the next generation. let's kick off, joe, your turn. did you watch the football? i let's kick off, joe, your turn. did you watch the football?- you watch the football? i was watchin: you watch the football? i was watching it — you watch the football? i was watching it in _ you watch the football? i was watching it in a _ you watch the football? i was watching it in a pub _ you watch the football? i was watching it in a pub with - you watch the football? i was| watching it in a pub with some friends and we were watching it in the background. i was quite nervous throughout the whole game because usa played better than i thought

they would and we played pretty poon they would and we played pretty poor. 0—0 draw, it now comes down to this big crunch match between wales next week. that's what you get when you're in england fanned. it obviously wasn't enough to keep the attention of the wags, judge and by the photographs on the front of the paper. the sun also uses the same headline. it’s paper. the sun also uses the same headline. �* , ., ., headline. it's a good headline, let's face it, _ headline. it's a good headline, let's face it, but _ headline. it's a good headline, let's face it, but you _ headline. it's a good headline, let's face it, but you can - let's face it, but you can understand why they've gone with these _ understand why they've gone with these pictures. the thing is, you know_ these pictures. the thing is, you know they've got lenses focused on them throughout the entire match, so you never_ them throughout the entire match, so you never know, it mightjust have been _ you never know, it mightjust have been a _ you never know, it mightjust have been a lucky— you never know, it mightjust have been a lucky thing, or perhaps they were just _ been a lucky thing, or perhaps they were just genuinely underwhelmed sup i don't _ were just genuinely underwhelmed sup i don't know if any of the pavers are asking — i don't know if any of the pavers are asking the question, what were all them _ are asking the question, what were all them doing last night?- all them doing last night? because if they're yawning, _ all them doing last night? because if they're yawning, it _ all them doing last night? because if they're yawning, it was - all them doing last night? because if they're yawning, it was a - all them doing last night? because if they're yawning, it was a big - if they're yawning, it was a big night one way or the other. let's go

next to the front of the daily mail, because i think that has a little more substance on the match to come which is always the way to look. it's basically calling it the battle of britain — is that how you think of britain — is that how you think of it? of britain - is that how you think of it? ., , , of britain - is that how you think of it? . , , ., ., of it? inevitably if england are -la in: of it? inevitably if england are playing and — of it? inevitably if england are playing and you _ of it? inevitably if england are playing and you tend - of it? inevitably if england are playing and you tend to - of it? inevitably if england are. playing and you tend to support wales _ playing and you tend to support wales if— playing and you tend to support wales if your english, then yes i sunbose — wales if your english, then yes i suppose you could look at it like a derby, _ suppose you could look at it like a derby, can't you? and that gives it an exciting — derby, can't you? and that gives it an exciting edge, everyone will be tuned _ an exciting edge, everyone will be tuned in _ an exciting edge, everyone will be tuned in on — an exciting edge, everyone will be tuned in on tuesday, so we will see what _ tuned in on tuesday, so we will see what the _ tuned in on tuesday, so we will see what the outcome is. but i think i'm not the _ what the outcome is. but i think i'm not the best— what the outcome is. but i think i'm not the best person to be getting my football _ not the best person to be getting my football thoughts from supper what you impartial observer. will football thoughts from supper what you impartial observer.— you impartial observer. will you watch the? _ you impartial observer. will you watch the? you've _ you impartial observer. will you watch the? you've got - you impartial observer. will you watch the? you've got children, you impartial observer. will you - watch the? you've got children, are they watching?— watch the? you've got children, are they watching? there with their dad toni . ht, they watching? there with their dad tonight. they're _ they watching? there with their dad tonight, they're observing - tonight, they're observing everything. sol tonight, they're observing

everything. so i did have it on but i everything. so i did have it on but iwas _ everything. so i did have it on but i was include —— i wasn't glued. the i was include -- i wasn't glued. the last lionesses _ i was include —— i wasn't glued. tie: last lionesses match was i was include —— i wasn't glued. ti9: last lionesses match was better. i was include —— i wasn't glued. ti9 last lionesses match was better. you were a bit bored like the wags were — we don't hear much about the male partners of the lionesses, do we? is that a bit of a missed opportunity forjournalism?— that a bit of a missed opportunity forjournalism? what would you call them, the forjournalism? what would you call them. the hags? — forjournalism? what would you call them, the hags? may— forjournalism? what would you call them, the hags? may be _ forjournalism? what would you call them, the hags? may be not- forjournalism? what would you call them, the hags? may be not too . them, the hags? may be not too flattering. them, the hags? may be not too flatterina. : , flattering. laughter it's a function - flattering. laughter it's a function of - flattering. laughter - it's a function of newspapers flattering. laughter _ it's a function of newspapers over the last few decades have gotten so used to covering the wags, they don't know there's the man. the men will have to start upping their fashions, mind you they've got their sponsorship deals, quite attractive if you're the husband or boyfriend of a lion asked, or a female

partner, ortransgender of a lion asked, or a female partner, or transgender partner, of a lion asked, or a female partner, ortransgender partner, it doesn't matter who you are, that'll be an opportunity. somebody will want to lavish attention and money on you, but it's probably not something to wish for. let's move away from football and go to the i — what do you make of the story? this one is about the potential tory exodus. flit one is about the potential tory exodus. .., , one is about the potential tory exodus. _, , , one is about the potential tory exodus. , , , one is about the potential tory exodus. , ,, exodus. of course, this is really interesting- _ exodus. of course, this is really interesting. what _ exodus. of course, this is really interesting. what we _ exodus. of course, this is really interesting. what we are - exodus. of course, this is really interesting. what we are seeing exodus. of course, this is really i interesting. what we are seeing is quite _ interesting. what we are seeing is quite a _ interesting. what we are seeing is quite a few— interesting. what we are seeing is quite a few mps deciding they are out of— quite a few mps deciding they are out of politics, i think they can see that — out of politics, i think they can see that the writing is on the wall, keir starmer is pulling really well at the _ keir starmer is pulling really well at the moment, and deanna davidson, who was— at the moment, and deanna davidson, who was elected in 2019 and at the time was _ who was elected in 2019 and at the time was touted as a rising star in the conservative party, she's to the extremely— the conservative party, she's to the extremely right wing of the party, an ardent — extremely right wing of the party, an ardent brexiteers — of course brexit— an ardent brexiteers — of course brexit hasn't delivered the way it was promised, neither has levelled

up, economically we are in a dire situation — up, economically we are in a dire situation so— up, economically we are in a dire situation. sol up, economically we are in a dire situation. so i think there's a lot of mps _ situation. so i think there's a lot of mps generally who are thinking, "what _ of mps generally who are thinking, "what will— of mps generally who are thinking, "what will i do come the next election? _ "what will i do come the next election? i'll be out of a job, perhaps— election? i'll be out of a job, perhaps i_ election? i'll be out of a job, perhaps i need to start getting out there _ perhaps i need to start getting out there and — perhaps i need to start getting out there and sorting myself out. not all mps _ there and sorting myself out. not all mps obviously have second jobs, as some _ all mps obviously have second jobs, as some of— all mps obviously have second jobs, as some of the ones you'd hear about in cabinet _ as some of the ones you'd hear about in cabinet who are making a fortune doing _ in cabinet who are making a fortune doing other— in cabinet who are making a fortune doing other things. sol in cabinet who are making a fortune doing other things. so i understand it from _ doing other things. so i understand it from a _ doing other things. so i understand it from a human point of view, but also in _ it from a human point of view, but also in letting down your constituents.— also in letting down your constituents. �*, :, , , constituents. it's tough because if ou want constituents. it's tough because if you want a — constituents. it's tough because if you want a seat — constituents. it's tough because if you want a seat like _ constituents. it's tough because if you want a seat like bishop - you want a seat like bishop auckland, which she represents, a whole raft of others in the east midlands who are not initially thought of as winnable seats, you've done something extraordinary — from your party's point of view, they ought to be pushing hard to keep you, yet they kind of feel that they'll get punished by the constituents for all the sins of their party even though they may be their party even though they may be the ones who did something nobody

else had done before. it's quite a tough political hand, isn't it? you've also got some mps — i know christian— you've also got some mps — i know christian wakeford defected to labour~ — christian wakeford defected to labour. :, christian wakeford defected to labour. . :, , �* , christian wakeford defected to labour. . :, , �*, ., labour. there are rumours, it's fair to sa . labour. there are rumours, it's fair to say- it's — labour. there are rumours, it's fair to say- it's also _ labour. there are rumours, it's fair to say. it's also interesting - labour. there are rumours, it's fair to say. it's also interesting to - labour. there are rumours, it's fair to say. it's also interesting to see l to say. it's also interesting to see that liz truss _ to say. it's also interesting to see that liz truss came _ to say. it's also interesting to see that liz truss came out _ to say. it's also interesting to see that liz truss came out i - to say. it's also interesting to see that liz truss came out i think - that liz truss came out i think today— that liz truss came out i think today saying "you can't get rid of me. _ today saying "you can't get rid of me. you'll— today saying "you can't get rid of me, you'll have to drag me out." it'll me, you'll have to drag me out." it'll be _ me, you'll have to drag me out." it'll be interesting to see what the voters of norfolk think of that come next year. joe, have you heard of these rumours of possible defections, or is thatjust newspaper talk? defections, or is that 'ust newspaper talk?�* defections, or is that 'ust newspaper talk? not so much defections. — newspaper talk? not so much defections, but _ newspaper talk? not so much defections, but your - newspaper talk? not so much defections, but your right - newspaper talk? not so much defections, but your right to l newspaper talk? not so much i defections, but your right to say there are many conservative seats where the margin of victory was really quite slim. i wouldn't be surprised if he saw more of that, but i was speaking to a tory mp this

week and they were saying they thought they were about 50 mps who would not be standing in the next election, so don't be surprised if there is people coming out in the next week or so saying they'll do the same. . . ., , next week or so saying they'll do the same-— next week or so saying they'll do thesame. . : ., ~ the same. particularly if your an mp who has no — the same. particularly if your an mp who has no connection _ the same. particularly if your an mp who has no connection with - the same. particularly if your an mp who has no connection with the - who has no connection with the conservative party traditionally, your chances of getting a similar sort ofjob in your 40s to 60s are probably not that high.— probably not that high. exactly, that's why _ probably not that high. exactly, that's why you'll _ probably not that high. exactly, that's why you'll see _ probably not that high. exactly, that's why you'll see many - probably not that high. exactly, that's why you'll see many of i probably not that high. exactly, - that's why you'll see many of these mps perhaps polishing up their cvs and hoping that by virtue of going early and avoiding being part of a huge scrum, then aligning things quite nicely in the private sector or the consultancy lobbying, it's quite common for mps to do. 0bviously one where the public have really mixed views, as we obviously see when there are reports of this kind. let's move on from the i and look at the guardian. this is the

story of found most interesting, i don't know about you — explain to us what the background is to this? this is din tlnt what the background is to this? ti 3 is digging into a very interesting, quite sad feature of the care system in this country, that there is a model where you have care homes supported by charities in council funding, and you have these charities which come to a point saying they are being forced to evict people from their homes, because they don't feel enough council funding because they don't feel enough councilfunding is being put into provide an adequate quality care for those residents. so they say the councils should be putting more in— and you get these terrible situations for residents who have no certainty of what'll happen to them, it's very distressing, there is mental health problems and so on, and this storyjust points out how this is increasingly happening because councils aren't willing to

increase the to match higher costs, whether it's energy or food, and this causes a lot of upset for the residents. , , this causes a lot of upset for the residents— this causes a lot of upset for the residents. , , . , . ., ., residents. this is fascinating and disturbing. _ residents. this is fascinating and disturbing, leonard _ residents. this is fascinating and disturbing, leonard cheshire - residents. this is fascinating and disturbing, leonard cheshire is l disturbing, leonard cheshire is probably one of the best—known and long—established charities in this country, dealing with some of the most vulnerable people, 3000 people, according to the guardian. in 11 cases it has a eviction notices — two cases, they were redrawn after the council change their mind about the council change their mind about the fees and agreed to pay more. —— they were withdrawn. but it's a grim situation when the charity, and you could argue whether they should given charities do fill in the gaps in public provision, but nevertheless, where they're actually throwing people out, some with complex disabilities and limited places they can go. it’s complex disabilities and limited places they can go.— places they can go. it's horrific, and i places they can go. it's horrific, and i think _ places they can go. it's horrific, and i think grim _ places they can go. it's horrific, and i think grim is _

places they can go. it's horrific, and i think grim is the - places they can go. it's horrific, and i think grim is the word - places they can go. it's horrific, | and i think grim is the word that really— and i think grim is the word that really sums it up. we seem to be going _ really sums it up. we seem to be going backwards in many areas, you know, _ going backwards in many areas, you know, obviously the economic forecast — know, obviously the economic forecast is _ know, obviously the economic forecast is gloomy for so many reasons, — forecast is gloomy for so many reasons, but it's disgraceful. social— reasons, but it's disgraceful. social care is something that we've all known _ social care is something that we've all known is — social care is something that we've all known is a huge issue, we all know— all known is a huge issue, we all know that — all known is a huge issue, we all know that carers are in such shortage, _ know that carers are in such shortage, and we will all get old and respect that vulnerable time of life at— and respect that vulnerable time of life at the _ and respect that vulnerable time of life at the end. and it's in a right old state. — life at the end. and it's in a right old state, and i'm afraid there's no way to— old state, and i'm afraid there's no way to look— old state, and i'm afraid there's no way to look at the story and put any kind of— way to look at the story and put any kind of stance on it other than it's absolutely— kind of stance on it other than it's absolutely dreadful, it's awful. i've absolutely dreadful, it's awful. i've heard _ absolutely dreadful, it's awful. i've heard one case of a woman who had dementia whose daughter—in—law chose to move her because she decided that the care home she was in was too expensive. you can argue about that but she put her in another home — this is a case of a charity effectively throwing people out on the streets. there is no

quote from them in this article, it may be further down, the charity hasn't got its right to reply with us — but men cap said it's a slightly different situation, they can't evict people and then chose not to do it. but they are subsidising one in five of the people they support, subsidising to the charity. from a charity point of view that's not sustainable, is it? no it's not. having read further into the article, leonard cheshire say they would only evict if there is alternative places for them to 90, is alternative places for them to go, but there's still of having to move. :, �* , go, but there's still of having to move. . �* . . go, but there's still of having to move. . �*, ., ., move. that's an important clarification, _ move. that's an important clarification, i'm _ move. that's an important clarification, i'm glad - move. that's an important clarification, i'm glad you | move. that's an important i clarification, i'm glad you put move. that's an important - clarification, i'm glad you put that in. but the general point is — it's interesting, i talk to someone who worked at the care centre, they said that the reality is at care homes, if you pay for yourself or your loved ones, you are subsidising other patients because the local authorities are not paying the cost,

even though they are paying it, but they can't afford it because it would virtually wipe out many of their budgets, and there are limited amounts that how much they are allowed to raise, a 3% cap to 5% unless they hold a referendum first. it's a really difficult dilemma. as you were saying, it's almost as if the state provision has gone backwards. the state provision has gone backwards— the state provision has gone backwards. :, ., backwards. johnson came out and said he had a massive _ backwards. johnson came out and said he had a massive plan _ backwards. johnson came out and said he had a massive plan and _ backwards. johnson came out and said he had a massive plan and it _ backwards. johnson came out and said he had a massive plan and it was - he had a massive plan and it was putting _ he had a massive plan and it was putting an — he had a massive plan and it was putting an eye out. the money is never— putting an eye out. the money is never funnelled into the place you wanted _ never funnelled into the place you wanted to — never funnelled into the place you wanted to be funnelled to with your taxes _ wanted to be funnelled to with your taxes. public services are just an estate _ taxes. public services are just an estate. every single section of british— estate. every single section of british society at the moment has a crisis _ british society at the moment has a crisis in _ british society at the moment has a crisis in front of it. there's so much — crisis in front of it. there's so much leading up to this, and you can't _ much leading up to this, and you can'tjust— much leading up to this, and you can'tjust keep saying it's the pandemic in ukraine. it's a decade of underfunding public services,

which _ of underfunding public services, which in — of underfunding public services, which in my mind was a false economy. _ which in my mind was a false economy, you get to the point where you haven't _ economy, you get to the point where you haven't got any cushion and there's— you haven't got any cushion and there's nothing to cut when times to -et there's nothing to cut when times to get really— there's nothing to cut when times to get really bad. so that's where we are. it's _ get really bad. so that's where we are. it's not — get really bad. so that's where we are, it's not great and it's a real worry— are, it's not great and it's a real worry for— are, it's not great and it's a real worry for anyone who's looking for provision — worry for anyone who's looking for provision from their parents and the estate _ provision from their parents and the estate of— provision from their parents and the estate of care homes, how much they cost - _ estate of care homes, how much they cost - it _ estate of care homes, how much they cost - it is _ estate of care homes, how much they cost — it is extraordinary, you have to sell— cost — it is extraordinary, you have to sell your— cost — it is extraordinary, you have to sell your home. if you're lucky enough _ to sell your home. if you're lucky enough to— to sell your home. if you're lucky enough to have one in the first place — enough to have one in the first lace. . enough to have one in the first lace. , .. , enough to have one in the first lace, , .., , ., , enough to have one in the first nlace., , :, place. given politicians worry so much about _ place. given politicians worry so much about the _ place. given politicians worry so much about the pensioner - place. given politicians worry so much about the pensioner vote, place. given politicians worry so - much about the pensioner vote, this is one aspect of how much they'll give them to live on, but social care never seems to have the same political cachet, maybe that'll change. maybe we need a few 70 and 80—year—olds in the house of commons, maybe that would change things was back let them come to the commons and make their arguments they are. let's move to the telegraph, joe, an exclusive interview with the princess of wales

secular she sets out what what she wants to achieve in the next ten years of her life, it's all about improving the lives of children. she wants to focus on getting that right — she wants to stress the importance of building a safe and loving rolled around the child. there are often question marks when figures in the royalfamily take question marks when figures in the royal family take political issues and run with them. it's one of the least contentious political issues you could've found, so i think we will allow it, so to speak, because it's uncontestable he the right thing to be doing, with the long—term benefits of society. she long-term benefits of society. she saw this he — long—term benefits of society. she saw this he found something she's incredibly— saw this he found something she's incredibly passionate about, which is children. — incredibly passionate about, which is children, and she's decided to devote _ is children, and she's decided to devote her— is children, and she's decided to

devote her time mainly on that cause — devote her time mainly on that cause. and you can't argue with that. _ cause. and you can't argue with that, really, there are countless studies — that, really, there are countless studies that show the earlier you intervene. — studies that show the earlier you intervene, the better outcomes you'll _ intervene, the better outcomes you'll have for that child later on in life _ you'll have for that child later on in life she — you'll have for that child later on in life. she even talks about linking — in life. she even talks about linking and making sure those early years. _ linking and making sure those early years, which are so formative for a child _ years, which are so formative for a child in— years, which are so formative for a child in every— years, which are so formative for a child in every single way — if you don't _ child in every single way — if you don't get — child in every single way — if you don't get it— child in every single way — if you don't get it right then, you're talking — don't get it right then, you're talking higher crime rates, even potentially violent behaviour and potentially viole nt behaviour and homelessness. potentially violent behaviour and homelessness. so it is important, she's— homelessness. so it is important, she's thinking about the future. . let's _ she's thinking about the future. . let's take — she's thinking about the future. . let's take another story about the future and not a cheery one to end on, but we have to talk about these things, that's what we are here for when we talk about front pages. numberfive on my list when we talk about front pages. number five on my list is when we talk about front pages. numberfive on my list is pension age moves to 68, which could disrupt people's retirement plans. what do you make of that? pensions always

felt like a moving target, like it's a mirage that you never quite get to. : , , , a mirage that you never quite get to. absolutely, in these days you're luc if to. absolutely, in these days you're lucky if you — to. absolutely, in these days you're lucky if you can _ to. absolutely, in these days you're lucky if you can even _ to. absolutely, in these days you're lucky if you can even have - to. absolutely, in these days you're lucky if you can even have a - lucky if you can even have a pension. _ lucky if you can even have a pension, orwhatever lucky if you can even have a pension, or whatever it is. but i think— pension, or whatever it is. but i think this — pension, or whatever it is. but i think this is _ pension, or whatever it is. but i think this is probably inevitable. so what — think this is probably inevitable. so what we're looking at, there's a lot in— so what we're looking at, there's a lot in the _ so what we're looking at, there's a lot in the news at the moment about global— lot in the news at the moment about global population hitting whatever it is. global population hitting whatever it is but _ global population hitting whatever it is. but here in britain in 2014, you had — it is. but here in britain in 2014, you had apparently 3.2 working age people _ you had apparently 3.2 working age people for— you had apparently 3.2 working age people for everyone pensioner, and they're _ people for everyone pensioner, and they're predicting that by 2037 that will go _ they're predicting that by 2037 that will go down by 2.7%. not that long a-o, will go down by 2.7%. not that long ago. i— will go down by 2.7%. not that long ago. i don't — will go down by 2.7%. not that long ago, i don't have the year on hand, but you _ ago, i don't have the year on hand, but you are — ago, i don't have the year on hand, but you are talking about 12 working people _ but you are talking about 12 working people so — but you are talking about 12 working people. so you have this really difficult — people. so you have this really difficult thing to solve because we know _ difficult thing to solve because we know we've got labour shortages and very high— know we've got labour shortages and very high immigration. it's such a

huge _ very high immigration. it's such a huge subject to tackle, and you've -ot huge subject to tackle, and you've got this— huge subject to tackle, and you've got this ageing population living way longer, which is great, but at a certain— way longer, which is great, but at a certain point— way longer, which is great, but at a certain point those people could need _ certain point those people could need more reliance on the nhs and all that. _ need more reliance on the nhs and all that, and it's got to be paid for. all that, and it's got to be paid for~ so— all that, and it's got to be paid for~ so in— all that, and it's got to be paid for. so in other words, very simple economics — for. so in other words, very simple economics here — unless people are paying _ economics here — unless people are paying for— economics here — unless people are paying for more elderly people —— less people, and that is a huge strain— less people, and that is a huge strain on the future generations. so how do— strain on the future generations. so how do you — strain on the future generations. so how do you saw that? may be you have to do what _ how do you saw that? may be you have to do what china did, which is encouraging people to procreate, or the other— encouraging people to procreate, or the other way to doctor around? it's a conundrum. the other way to doctor around? it's a conundrum-— a conundrum. joe, you have ten seconds to _ a conundrum. joe, you have ten seconds to unwrap _ a conundrum. joe, you have ten seconds to unwrap that - a conundrum. joe, you have ten - seconds to unwrap that conundrum. make people work for longer, increase the... so that's the maths and you see by the treasury is doing it in you can see why they like it. thank you both, it was lovely to

have your company this evening. and thank you for yours at home. the papers will be back again tomorrow evening with benjamin butterworth from the i newspaper, and the author and journalist emma woolf. dojoin us then if you can but for now, goodnight. i'll be back at the midnight hour, stay with us on bbc news. hello there, this is your update from the bbc sports centre. england missed the chance to seal qualification to the knockouts of the world cup, after a goalless draw with the united states. gareth southgate's side created few chances, and the performance didn't go down well with the fans — with boos heard at the final whistle. natalie pirks reports. the bedouin tent—inspired al bayt stadium was the destination.

and on the party bus, english confidence was flowing. fans sing # we will score more goals than you # england! didn't you see the first game? it's a no—brainer. we're the best in the world, it's going to be no problem. i think we'll beat them comfortably. six points tonight, let's have it. but there's a fine line between confidence and arrogance, and how the us team would love to make fans eat their words. an unchanged england team began brightly enough, jude bellingham and bukayo saka combining beautifully to play harry kane almost in. but as the usa got a foothold, england looked laboured. mckennie found the space but couldn't make it count. american pressure kept coming. chelsea's christian pulisic with a belter. and with the crossbar still reverberating,

england finally found some space, but mason mount found only the hands of matt turner. if you were hoping for a second—half improvement, look away now. pickford implored his team—mates to switch on, but england's most creative players were anonymous, and they were loving it. three substitutions were made, but against a well—drilled defensive blue line, england's probing was ponderous. in injury time, england fans looked to a higher power. there was nothing heavenly about harry kane's effort. england will still qualify if they avoid a four—goal defeat to wales. that was little consolation, though, to fans... ..as the boos rang out. same old, lack of urgency, terrible. really upset. we came here hoping for so much, and at least we didn't lose. we still know that the group's in our hands. i we're still top of the group. the same thing happened _

at the euros, where we won the first game, drew the second, i and then we won the third going into the knockout stages, | so hopefully that's what we canj do this time. this result means england still haven't beaten the us at a world cup. tonight, they red, white and blew the chance to wrap things up early. natalie pirks, bbc news, qatar. the result still leaves england top of the group — but wales have a realjob on their hands to stay in the tournament. they were beaten by iran, in a chaotic finish to a game which saw their goalkeeper sent off and two stoppage—time goals. hywel griffith has more. wales have been waiting since 1958 for their first world cup win. many came to the stadium thinking this could be the day. lots of hope, some expectation even after they watched iran crumble against england. but this was a very different story. wales had to ride their luck. in the first half, what looked like an iranian goal, ruled out for offside. then in the second half, iran hitting both posts, and wayne hennessey

having to scramble. he seemed to be the man who'd keep wales in it — until about ten minutes from the end, he took out an iranian player and was sent from the pitch. that really was the turning point — two very well—taken iranian goals, the final in the 98th minute, and devastating for wales and their captain, gareth bale. i don't think we played the best of games as a team in the first half. we gave them a bit too much time on the ball. but it's difficult, obviously we'll go back and look at the game and reflect on it in a day or so. but yeah, like i said, it'sjust disappointing at the moment, and it's hard to really look back and see what's gone on. so what next for wales? 0nly beating england next week can give them any chance of staying in this competition. otherwise, that 64—year wait, yes, will come to an end, but wales will be on the plane home. hywel griffith there. after less than a week of action, the hosts qatar are out. they were beaten by senegal.

and courtesy of the other game in their group not going their way, they become the first—ever host nation to be eliminated after just two games. andy swiss was watching. they hoped to make history — but not like this. just two games in and curtains for qatar — the earliest exit ever by a world cup host. ranked 50th in the world with a squad who play entirely in their local league, this tournament was always going to be a challenge — but once again, they fell short. stumble there could be costly! boulaye dia putting senegal ahead after the most glaring of defensive errors. it soon got even worse for qatar when diedhiou made it 2—0, and that seemed to be that. but then finally, something for the home fans to savour. mohammed muntari with qatar's first—ever world cup goal — but the celebrations didn't last long, as senegal sealed a 3—1win

to revive their hopes, and ultimately end qatar's. after years of build—up and months of training, all over in just six days. andy swiss, bbc news. and in that other group a game, the netherlands drew 1—1 with ecuador to offically seal qatar's exit. cody gakpo with the opener for the dutch, enner valencia equalised early in the second half for his third goal of the tournament. the result means the top three in that group are separated byjust one point, going into the final group of games. and that's all the sport for now. hello. after a turbulent week of weather, many of us had a much drier friday. and there's some dry weather at the end of this forecast, too — but before we get there, more rain to come through the weekend, particularly on saturday, some of it'll be heavy, most of us having a drier day on sunday.

and that rain is all tied in with this atlantic system, gradually pushing its way eastwards through saturday, some of that rain is going to be heavy. also, notice the isobars are close together, so we'll see some gusty winds, especially for western areas. so this is how saturday shapes up — this band of rain gradually pushing north and eastwards, through southwest england, wales, northwest england, western scotland, northern ireland — though drier here through the afternoon, although still likely to see a few heavy showers. further east, less sunshine through the morning — in fact, east anglia, southeast england could stay dry for much of the day. northeast england, perhaps, too, but some gusty winds, especially for irish sea coasts and the western isles, those gusts perhaps reaching 45—50mph. but they're south or south—westerly winds, so mild airflooding across the uk, with highs of 11—14 celsius. now through saturday night, we see that band of rain continuing to push its way eastwards — again, some of that will be heavy, the strongest winds extending to eastern coasts. behind it, something clearer across many western areas, though a few showers starting to push in from the west. it will be a very mild night, with temperatures for some holding

up to 10—11 celsius, and not much lower than 6—7 at their lowest. so, as we head into sunday, here's our frontal system — but notice how it's lingering very close to the southeast of england. so we'll keep a hang—back of cloud, and also potentially some outbreaks of rain across parts of southeast england, maybe east anglia, too, through the morning. behind it, for many, some good spells of sunshine, but further showers will be pushing into western areas, and those are likely become quite blustery again with some strong winds for irish sea coast. the winds should start to ease through the day across eastern areas. not quite as mild as it would have been on saturday, but temperatures still quite widely in double figures for most. and actually, for many, sunday looks to be the drier day of the weekend. and as we head into next week, we actually see this area of high pressure starting to take charge, and just keeping these frontal systems at bay for most of us. so as we move into next week, things are looking mostly dry — although there will be a lot of cloud around, could

also see some problems with overnight mist and fog. that's all from me, goodbye.

this is bbc news with the latest headlines for viewers in the uk and around the world. agony for england fans, as their team are held to a 0—0 draw in the world cup against the usa. kherson under attack — hospital patients are evacuated from the recently—liberated ukrainian city after constant russian shelling. nurses in england, wales and northern ireland are to strike for the very first time — they'll walk out in december in a dispute over pay. and the world's longest—running theatre production, agatha christie's the mousetrap, celebrates an incredible 70 years in london's west end. next, it's broadway.