sanderson, seeking $300,000 in terry sanderson, seeking $300,000 in damages. she is countersued, seeking $1 in damages, plus legal fees. tonight at ten, political turmoil in france disrupts king charles' planned state visit. he will now head to berlin instead of paris for his first trip as monarch. there have been violent protests this week in the french us actress gwyneth paltrow takes the stand in a skiing accident case from seven years ago. she said she is not responsible. a state visit by king charles to france has been postponed because of more planned protests against resident emmanuel macron�*s pension reforms. a child's drawing

sparked police investigation, the criminal case in a family torn apart. teacher took her own life when her school was downgraded. welcome. from security to diplomacy and us presidentjoe biden open remarks to canada's wednesday with a bond short to canada before getting down to business. he spoke of the long—standing partnership between the two nations in the need to work together on issues like climate change and trade. president biden and his counterpartjustin trudeau also agreed to a deal to stop asylum—seekers seeking to move across the border by unofficial crossings. 0n global security president biden said that china has not yet delivered arms to russia. 1 don't take china lately. i don't

take russia lately. but i think we vastly exaggerate. i would, i have been here now for the past three months about how china is going to provide significant weapons to russia. they haven't yet. does not mean that they will not. but they have not. and if anything has happened the west has coalesced. significantly more. how about the quad. how aboutjapan in the united states in south korea. how about what... ijust want states in south korea. how about what. .. i just want to states in south korea. how about what... i just want to put states in south korea. how about what... ijust want to put in perspective, i do not take lightly. what china and russia are doing. and it could get significantly worse. let's put it into perspective. we are united coalitions. we divide six of candida —— we the united states

and canada. a, of candida -- we the united states and canada-— and canada. a visit between king charles to france _ and canada. a visit between king charles to france has _ and canada. a visit between king charles to france has been - and canada. a visit between king - charles to france has been postponed because of escalating protests and some violence over the pension reforms. president macron plan to raise the pension age has faced this opposition. from paris here is oui’ our world corresponded. furious with president macron over his plans to raise the state pension age to 64. matters are quickly deteriorating into next week's state visit by charles in the queen consort was clearly in the protester sites. so from president macron a

change of plan. translation: ll change of plan. translation: ., ., ., , translation: it would not have been serious of us — translation: it would not have been serious of us to _ translation: it would not have been serious of us to propose _ translation: it would not have been serious of us to propose a _ translation: it would not have been serious of us to propose a state - serious of us to propose a state visit in the mists of protests. the two men met _ visit in the mists of protests. the two men met several times when charles prince of wales. after today's decision was taken. the president telephoned the king to explain that the first state visit of his reign would have to be postponed. so what should have been the glittering confirmation of a restored relationship with a ceremony welcome will have to wait. paris, quite simply is in no ftse to welcome the queen and king. 0n the streets of france there is anger. that's the problem. this was the town hall in bordeaux last night. rebuilding the king and queen

consort— due to visit next tuesday. and this was the national assembly a few days ago. as friends's prime minister explained why members were not be giving a vote on pension reforms. the king had been due to address the french senate. at this very grand building is the palace of versailles. where the state banquet had been planned for monday evening. hardly the right backdrop in present circumstances. the state visit to france will be rearranged. the visit to germany will go ahead as planned. but paris has not been completely denied the site of control. the wax works and build their version of a tilted king today. —— killed.

the country has been gripped by months of the biggest of restrictions and the sister of the government's plans to limit powers over the courts. protesters gathered outside of downing street and a plan for the opportunity for the gathered media was cancelled and there was no joint statement. during their meeting mr sunak and mr netting like was expected to discuss strengthening strategic ties, the war in ukraine in forging a united international front against iran's nuclear programme. israel's my minister arriving in downing street this one. a warm welcome from rishi sunak but the sounds of protests ringing out behind them. it is nothing netanyahu has not seen for weeks back on. on a

much, much biggerscale, his domestic woes are not follow him wherever he goes. for domestic woes are not follow him wherever he goes.— domestic woes are not follow him wherever he goes. for the first time in a lona wherever he goes. for the first time in a long time _ wherever he goes. for the first time in a long time british _ wherever he goes. for the first time in a long time british dues - in a long time british dues are taking a stand in support over the israeli protesters. they don't want anything to do with what they are seeing in israel. the racism, the extremism, the deterioration from democracy and liberal values. a, democracy and liberal values. a battle for the soul of israel has been reaching for weeks. mr netanyahu's opponents are furious at legal forms which they say will undermine the rule of law and shields shield the prime minister from his own legal difficulties. we have a dictator in israel. that is trying _ have a dictator in israel. that is trying to— have a dictator in israel. that is trying to make these people hurt us. you tell_ trying to make these people hurt us. you tell your government, you tell your people. you tell your government, you tell your people-— your people. protesters outside of the british embassy _ your people. protesters outside of the british embassy outside - your people. protesters outside of the british embassy outside of - your people. protesters outside of the british embassy outside of tel| the british embassy outside of tel aviv last week, they want israel's

traditional alice to intervene. this would bring said they are bilateral relationship had never been closer with britain. for palestinians israel's political turmoil forms a noisy backdrop to their own difficult lives. this morning they queued up at israeli checkpoints, hoping to reachjerusalem for the first friday prayers of ramadan. as real tension here, violence is on the rise in the west bank. coming weeks could be challenging. the us actress gwyneth paltrow has been giving evidence in her trial over a skiing accident from 2016. she is being sued by retired optometrists terry sanderson who is seeking $300,000 in damages with the oscar winner has countersued seeking $1 in damages plus legal fees. winner has countersued seeking $1 in damages plus legalfees. terry sanderson has a queued —— accused her of causing a crash that has caused broken ribs on a beginners

ski slope. gwyneth paltrow has said that she is not at fault for the collision saying that she would have not have left the accident scene without leaving details. this is the scene live in the court in utah where there has been a short recess. gwyneth paltrow is returning to the stand so let's listen into her evidence all rise for the jury. so miss paltrow i want to shift gears and...

so miss paltrow i want to shift gears and- - -— so miss paltrow i want to shift gears and... can i have it on the record that _ gears and... can i have it on the record that my _ gears and... can i have it on the record that my objection - gears and... can i have it on the record that my objection was - record that my objection was abstained. record that my ob'ection was abstained._ record that my ob'ection was abstained. �* , ., , ., abstained. i'm sure it was on the record whenever _ abstained. i'm sure it was on the record whenever it _ abstained. i'm sure it was on the record whenever it was _ abstained. i'm sure it was on the record whenever it was there. i l record whenever it was there. i don't recall. record whenever it was there. i don't recall-— record whenever it was there. i don't recall. ., ., , ., don't recall. now would be a good time for a bench _ don't recall. now would be a good time for a bench meeting. - don't recall. now would be a good time for a bench meeting. the - time for a bench meeting. the ob'ection time for a bench meeting. the objection was _ time for a bench meeting. tue: objection was sustained. time for a bench meeting. the i objection was sustained. shifting rears. objection was sustained. shifting tears. the objection was sustained. shifting gears. the reason _ objection was sustained. shifting gears. the reason i _ objection was sustained. shifting gears. the reason i got - objection was sustained. shifting gears. the reason i got involvedl objection was sustained. shifting i gears. the reason i got involved in this case in the first place was your counterclaim so i want to talk with you about the counterclaim. is it true you feel that it is unfair that mr macri has brought this case against you. t that mr macri has brought this case against you-— that mr macri has brought this case against you. t do. and he has against you. i do. and he has deterred _ against you. i do. and he has deterred you _ against you. i do. and he has deterred you from _ against you. i do. and he has deterred you from enjoying what was a very expensive vacation. t toast a very expensive vacation. i lost half a day _ a very expensive vacation. i lost half a day of _ a very expensive vacation. i lost half a day of skiing. _ a very expensive vacation. i lost half a day of skiing. i _ a very expensive vacation. i lost half a day of skiing. i think- a very expensive vacation. i lost half a day of skiing. i think that l half a day of skiing. i think that what -- is _

half a day of skiing. i think that what -- is what _ half a day of skiing. i think that what -- is what your _ half a day of skiing. i think that what -- is what your counsel i half a day of skiing. i think that i what -- is what your counsel has what —— is what your counsel has argued as well. that you had a full day pass but you could only ski half a day. day pass but you could only ski half a da . �* ., ., . yes a day. and i went out for lunch. yes that's when — a day. and i went out for lunch. yes that's when you _ a day. and i went out for lunch. yes that's when you went _ a day. and i went out for lunch. yes that's when you went down - a day. and i went out for lunch. yes that's when you went down and - a day. and i went out for lunch. yes that's when you went down and got| a day. and i went out for lunch. yesl that's when you went down and got a massage. did not get your knee checked out did not have any medical attention. trio. checked out did not have any medical attention. ., ., .,. attention. no, it did not feel acute in any way- — attention. no, it did not feel acute in any way- just — attention. no, it did not feel acute in any way. just like _ attention. no, it did not feel acute in any way. just like i _ attention. no, it did not feel acute in any way. just like i had - attention. no, it did not feel acute in any way. just like i had over - in any way. just like i had over stretch my knee and sustained a blow but it did not feel like it needed medical attention. bud but it did not feel like it needed medical attention.— medical attention. and you are bringing this — medical attention. and you are bringing this claim _ medical attention. and you are bringing this claim for- medical attention. and you are bringing this claim for $1. - medical attention. and you are bringing this claim for $1. i - medical attention. and you are | bringing this claim for $1. i am. medical attention. and you are - bringing this claim for $1. i am. do ou still bringing this claim for $1. i am. do you still have — bringing this claim for $1. i am. do you still have that _ bringing this claim for $1. i am. do you still have that dollar— bringing this claim for $1. i am. do you still have that dollar bill? i'm not even going to respond to that. i don't need it. you saw mr 0wens rave —— weave that $1 around. $1 in symbolic images. tt -- weave that $1 around. $1 in symbolic images.— -- weave that $1 around. $1 in symbolic images. it is an actual dollar i'm _ symbolic images. it is an actual

dollar i'm asking _ symbolic images. it is an actual dollar i'm asking for. _ symbolic images. it is an actual dollar i'm asking for. but - symbolic images. it is an actual dollar i'm asking for. but you i symbolic images. it is an actual i dollar i'm asking for. but you also testify when _ dollar i'm asking for. but you also testify when i— dollar i'm asking for. but you also testify when i ask _ dollar i'm asking for. but you also testify when i ask questions - dollar i'm asking for. but you also testify when i ask questions in - dollar i'm asking for. but you also. testify when i ask questions in your deposition that that $1 is symbolic. do you remember me asking? t5 do you remember me asking? is symbolic because the damages would actually be more. dear symbolic because the damages would actually be more.— actually be more. dear member me askin: if it actually be more. dear member me asking if it was _ actually be more. dear member me asking if it was symbolic _ actually be more. dear member me asking if it was symbolic and - actually be more. dear member me asking if it was symbolic and you i asking if it was symbolic and you said yes it is. and i asked as well when you learned about from taylor swift because she asked for $1 in symbolic damages, right? and t swift because she asked for $1 in symbolic damages, right? and i think i said at that — symbolic damages, right? and i think i said at that point _ symbolic damages, right? and i think i said at that point that _ symbolic damages, right? and i think i said at that point that i _ symbolic damages, right? and i think i said at that point that i had not - i said at that point that i had not been familiar with it but i have since. �* . ., , since. but at the time a couple of ears auo since. but at the time a couple of years ago in _ since. but at the time a couple of years ago in 2020 _ since. but at the time a couple of years ago in 2020 you _ since. but at the time a couple of years ago in 2020 you did - since. but at the time a couple of. years ago in 2020 you did not know anything about taylor swift's $1 symbolic damage lawsuit was mike relevance your honour. because i asked about it at the time and she denied it. t asked about it at the time and she denied it. . . asked about it at the time and she denied it. ., , ., ., ., ., denied it. i was not aware at the time. denied it. i was not aware at the time- are _ denied it. i was not aware at the time- are you — denied it. i was not aware at the time. are you good _ denied it. i was not aware at the time. are you good friends - denied it. i was not aware at the time. are you good friends with | time. are you good friends with ta [or time. are you good friends with taylor swift? — time. are you good friends with taylor swift? no. _

time. are you good friends with taylor swift? no. i— time. are you good friends with taylor swift? no. i would - time. are you good friends with taylor swift? no. i would not. time. are you good friends with | taylor swift? no. i would not say time. are you good friends with - taylor swift? no. i would not say we are aood taylor swift? no. i would not say we are good friends. _ taylor swift? no. i would not say we are good friends. i _ taylor swift? no. i would not say we are good friends. i would _ taylor swift? no. i would not say we are good friends. i would say - taylor swift? no. i would not say we are good friends. i would say we are| are good friends. i would say we are friendly. i have taken my kids to one of her concerts before, but we don't talk very often. you one of her concerts before, but we don't talk very often.— don't talk very often. you have never given — don't talk very often. you have never given miss _ don't talk very often. you have never given miss swift - don't talk very often. you have | never given miss swift personal intimate gifts for christmas? your honour, relevance? _ intimate gifts for christmas? your honour, relevance? she _ intimate gifts for christmas? your honour, relevance? shejust - intimate gifts for christmas? your honour, relevance? she just saidl intimate gifts for christmas? your i honour, relevance? she just said she honour, relevance? she 'ust said she was not friends h honour, relevance? she 'ust said she was not friends with _ honour, relevance? she 'ust said she was not friends with her_ honour, relevance? she just said she was not friends with her so... - was not friends with her so... inquiring on that. you are telling the jury that you are here asking for $1. t the jury that you are here asking for $1. . the jury that you are here asking for $1-- that _ the jury that you are here asking for $1.- that is _ the jury that you are here asking for $1.- that is not - the jury that you are here asking for $1. t am. that is not totally for $1. i am. that is not totally accurate though, is _ for $1. i am. that is not totally accurate though, is it? - for $1. i am. that is not totally accurate though, is it? with i accurate though, is it? with teaming? — accurate though, is it? with teaming? the _ accurate though, is it? with teaming? the jury - accurate though, is it? with teaming? the jury will- accurate though, is it? with teaming? the jury will not l accurate though, is it? with. teaming? the jury will not be teaming? the “my will not be decidin: teaming? the “my will not be deciding this — teaming? the jury will not be deciding this but _ teaming? the jury will not be deciding this but you - teaming? the jury will not be deciding this but you are - teaming? the jury will not be deciding this but you are also teaming? the jury will not be - deciding this but you are also doing asking thejudge to deciding this but you are also doing asking the judge to award attorney fees for over hundreds of thousand dollars, is that not true? the “udaes dollars, is that not true? the

judges made _ dollars, is that not true? the judges made a _ dollars, is that not true? the judges made a ruling on this issue. it is a _ judges made a ruling on this issue. it is a separate event.— judges made a ruling on this issue. it is a separate event. sustained as to relevance- _ it is a separate event. sustained as to relevance. the _ it is a separate event. sustained as to relevance. the relevance - it is a separate event. sustained as to relevance. the relevance is - it is a separate event. sustained as to relevance. the relevance is your| to relevance. the relevance is your honourm — to relevance. the relevance is your honourm if— to relevance. the relevance is your honourm ifwe— to relevance. the relevance is your honour... if we want _ to relevance. the relevance is your honour... if we want to _ to relevance. the relevance is your honour... if we want to argue - honour... if we want to argue relevance _ honour... if we want to argue relevance we _ honour... if we want to argue relevance we should - honour... if we want to argue relevance we should do - honour... if we want to argue i relevance we should do appear. honour... if we want to argue - relevance we should do appear. —— up here _ relevance we should do appear. -- up here. ,, , ,. ,, ., here. studio: some discussion about the relationship _ here. studio: some discussion about the relationship between _ here. studio: some discussion about the relationship between gwyneth - the relationship between gwyneth paltrow and taylor swift. and gwyneth paltrow being asked if she's ever given any gifts to taylor swift which at that point the lawyers have intervened and are now discussing with each other the relevance of this and this as the trial resumes and the evidence resumes of gwyneth paltrow giving evidence in this case sparked by a skiing accident some seven years ago now in utah in 2016. we do not have any sound because once the discussions go between the

lawyers and the judge then we lose that. wejust lawyers and the judge then we lose that. we just have the sound for when people are in the evidence box giving their testimony. this is all around when men, terry sanderson, 76, accusing the actress of causing a collision that left him with brain damage and broken ribs. giving evidencejust in the damage and broken ribs. giving evidence just in the past few minutes, gwyneth paltrow has told the court that terry sanderson is actually, not telling you the truth, he is seeking some $300,000 in damages for the incident. that actually happened on a beginner slope at the deer valley resort in utah. gwyneth paltrow denies she is responsible and counter suing and as you have to start this interaction about this $1 and damages that she is claiming in the lawyer for gwyneth —— the lawyer for terry sanderson questioning the relevance.

saying it was symbolic but in reality the amount would be far greater if she didn't want to pursue it. terry sanderson's lawyer saying she was distracted when the accident happened watching her children rather than the slope. and we heard an hour or so of evidence from gwyneth paltrow going into some detail about the moments that the accident actually happened. she says that terry sanderson fell and hit the ground after the collision. she is not alleging that the crash was in any way some kind of sexual assault, but it was an accident. —— accident. she says she froze when it happened and then pushed on the hill and shouted at him. she said she does not remember her yelling or screaming until, she says that she was very angry at what had happened and she said she said to terry sanderson as he was on the ground,

what are you doing. and then she said that he bumbled "i am sorry, i'm sorry". and that terry sanderson had screamed and swung at him as well. and she apologised for her battling which lets go back to the court and see about that sound... so it court and see about that sound... sr it is not true that you are just asking for a dollar but this is for the court to decide later... you are asking for your attorneys fees in this case which could be quite substantial, is that not true? t’m substantial, is that not true? i'm askin: substantial, is that not true? i'm asking for _ substantial, is that not true? i'm asking for a _ substantial, is that not true? i'm asking for a dollar for me and then reimbursement of attorneys fees which is a separate thing. that could be a _ which is a separate thing. that could be a substantial- which is a separate thing. “trust could be a substantial amount, correct? potentially. when your counsel got up waving the $1 do you not think that is a bit of a mischaracterisation?- not think that is a bit of a mischaracterisation? ., ,. . mischaracterisation? she said i have one more question _ mischaracterisation? she said i have one more question on _ mischaracterisation? she said i have one more question on this _ mischaracterisation? she said i have one more question on this issue. - mischaracterisation? she said i have | one more question on this issue. and this is— one more question on this issue. and this is now— one more question on this issue. and this is now three.— this is now three. overruled. go

ahead. this is now three. overruled. go ahead- do _ this is now three. overruled. go ahead- do you _ this is now three. overruled. go ahead. do you think _ this is now three. overruled. go ahead. do you think $1 - this is now three. overruled. go ahead. do you think $1 is - this is now three. overruled. go ahead. do you think $1 is a - ahead. do you think $1 is a mischaracterisation? - ahead. do you think $1 is a mischaracterisation? i- ahead. do you think $1 is a| mischaracterisation? i took ahead. do you think $1 is a i mischaracterisation? i took it ahead. do you think $1 is a - mischaracterisation? i took it as i would receive _ mischaracterisation? i took it as i would receive that _ mischaracterisation? i took it as i would receive that $1 _ mischaracterisation? i took it as i would receive that $1 which - mischaracterisation? i took it as i would receive that $1 which is - mischaracterisation? i took it as i would receive that $1 which is all| mischaracterisation? i took it as i | would receive that $1 which is all i am asking for. t5 would receive that $1 which is all i am asking for-— am asking for. is it not true that you misrepresented _ am asking for. is it not true that you misrepresented the - am asking for. is it not true that you misrepresented the numberj am asking for. is it not true that i you misrepresented the number of things to the street today. absolutely not. == things to the street today. absolutely not.— things to the street today. i absolutely not.- you things to the street today. - absolutely not.- you have absolutely not. -- 'ury. you have been here _ absolutely not. -- 'ury. you have been here every _ absolutely not. -- jury. you have been here every minute - absolutely not. -- jury. you have been here every minute of- absolutely not. -- jury. you have been here every minute of this i absolutely not. -- jury. you have i been here every minute of thisjury true? _ been here every minute of thisjury true? and — been here every minute of thisjury true? and you are intending to be here _ true? and you are intending to be here every minute next week? | true? and you are intending to be here every minute next week? i am. have ou here every minute next week? i am. have you enjoyed — here every minute next week? i am. have you enjoyed yourself? - here every minute next week? i am. have you enjoyed yourself? i - here every minute next week? i am. have you enjoyed yourself? i have i have you en'oyed yourself? i have learned a have you enjoyed yourself? i have learned a lot. _ have you enjoyed yourself? i have learned a lot. who _ have you enjoyed yourself? i have learned a lot. who hit _ have you enjoyed yourself? i have learned a lot. who hit who? - have you enjoyed yourself? i have learned a lot. who hit who? mr. learned a lot. who hit who? mr sanderson _ learned a lot. who hit who? mr sanderson hit _ learned a lot. who hit who? mr sanderson hit me. _ learned a lot. who hit who? mr sanderson hit me. the - learned a lot. who hit who? mr. sanderson hit me. the comment learned a lot. who hit who? mr- sanderson hit me. the comment was that mr sanderson _ sanderson hit me. the comment was that mr sanderson does _ sanderson hit me. the comment was that mr sanderson does not - sanderson hit me. the comment was that mr sanderson does not take i that mr sanderson does not take criticism — that mr sanderson does not take criticism well. do you take criticism _ criticism well. do you take criticism well? in

criticism well. do you take criticism well?— criticism well. do you take criticism well? , , ., ,, ., criticism well? in my profession after all of _ criticism well? in my profession after all of these _ criticism well? in my profession after all of these years - criticism well? in my profession after all of these years of - criticism well? in my profession after all of these years of being | criticism well? in my profession l after all of these years of being in the public eye, i think i take it relatively well.— the public eye, i think i take it relatively well. the public eye, i think i take it relativel well. ., ~ , , relatively well. you keep sending me notes... " relatively well. you keep sending me notes- -- ' l— relatively well. you keep sending me notes... - i did _ relatively well. you keep sending me notes... " i did not _ relatively well. you keep sending me notes... " i did not cause _ relatively well. you keep sending me notes... " i did not cause these - notes... " i did not cause these damages! _ notes... " i did not cause these damages'-_ notes... " i did not cause these damaues'. . ,., , . damages". that is absolute correct. do ou damages". that is absolute correct. do you feel — damages". that is absolute correct. do you feel some _ damages". that is absolute correct. do you feel some empathy - damages". that is absolute correct. do you feel some empathy for- damages". that is absolute correct. do you feel some empathy for mr i do you feel some empathy for mr sanderson and his declining brain? i really sanderson and his declining brain? really do. i sanderson and his declining brain? i really do. i feel very sorry for him. it seems he has had a very difficult life., but i did not cause the accident so i cannot be at fault for anything that subsequently happened to him. so for anything that subsequently happened to him.— for anything that subsequently happened to him. for anything that subsequently ha ened to him. , ., ., happened to him. so his daughter got u . happened to him. so his daughter got u- and said happened to him. so his daughter got up and said that _ happened to him. so his daughter got up and said that he _ happened to him. so his daughter got up and said that he was _ happened to him. so his daughter got up and said that he was cursing - happened to him. so his daughter got up and said that he was cursing out i up and said that he was cursing out her daughter, did you hearthat?t did. her daughter, did you hearthat? did. did you her daughter, did you hearthat? i did. did you cause that? i did not cause that. did did. did you cause that? i did not cause that-— did. did you cause that? i did not

cause that. did you give him brain in'uries cause that. did you give him brain injuries from _ cause that. did you give him brain injuries from 2006? _ cause that. did you give him brain injuries from 2006? i _ cause that. did you give him brain injuries from 2006? i did - cause that. did you give him brain injuries from 2006? i did not. i cause that. did you give him brain. injuries from 2006? i did not. let's start on a happier _ injuries from 2006? i did not. let's start on a happier note. _ injuries from 2006? i did not. let's start on a happier note. let's bring | start on a happier note. let's bring up start on a happier note. let's bring up the _ start on a happier note. let's bring up the picture of you and moses. and while _ up the picture of you and moses. and while that— up the picture of you and moses. and while that is coming up, did you personally— while that is coming up, did you personally take a southee with you and your— personally take a southee with you and your son? i personally take a southee with you and your son?— personally take a southee with you and your son? i take selfies with my kids all the time. _ and your son? i take selfies with my kids all the time. we'll— and your son? i take selfies with my kids all the time. we'll pull- and your son? i take selfies with my kids all the time. we'll pull it - and your son? i take selfies with my kids all the time. we'll pull it up i kids all the time. we'll pull it up 'ust a kids all the time. we'll pull it up just a minute. _ kids all the time. we'll pull it up just a minute. you _ kids all the time. we'll pull it up just a minute. you know- kids all the time. we'll pull it up just a minute. you know what i kids all the time. we'll pull it up i just a minute. you know what picture i am talking — just a minute. you know what picture i am talking about, did you personally take that photo? on the date of issue? _ personally take that photo? on the date of issue? i— personally take that photo? on the date of issue? i did _ personally take that photo? on the date of issue? i did on _ personally take that photo? on the date of issue? i did on the - personally take that photo? on the date of issue? i did on the day i personally take that photo? on the date of issue? i did on the day the | date of issue? i did on the day the accident. tt date of issue? i did on the day the accident. . . date of issue? i did on the day the accident. , ., ., ., accident. it is hard to tell who the nine-year-old _ accident. it is hard to tell who the nine-year-old is _ accident. it is hard to tell who the nine-year-old is there. _ accident. it is hard to tell who the nine-year-old is there. are - accident. it is hard to tell who the nine-year-old is there. are you i accident. it is hard to tell who the | nine-year-old is there. are you on nine—year—old is there. are you on the left? _ nine—year—old is there. are you on the left? i — nine-year-old is there. are you on the left? ., ., , the left? i am on the right. moses on the left- _ the left? i am on the right. moses on the left. yes. _ the left? i am on the right. moses on the left. yes. this _ the left? i am on the right. moses on the left. yes. this is _ on the left. yes. this is defence 8061 on the left. yes. this is defence 806! would _ on the left. yes. this is defence 8061 would like _ on the left. yes. this is defence 8061 would like to _ on the left. yes. this is defence 8061 would like to move - on the left. yes. this is defence| 8061 would like to move forward 806i would like to move forward deposition. 8061 would like to move forward deposition-— 8061 would like to move forward deosition. . j~~ , .

deposition. evidence 86 is received. you have a — deposition. evidence 86 is received. you have a helmet _ deposition. evidence 86 is received. you have a helmet on _ deposition. evidence 86 is received. you have a helmet on there. - deposition. evidence 86 is received. you have a helmet on there. and i you have a helmet on there. and goggles — you have a helmet on there. and goggles. did you always that day will while on the slopes? mr ramon testified _ will while on the slopes? mr ramon testified that you were not wearing a helmet— testified that you were not wearing a helmet or call girls or any face covering — a helmet or call girls or any face covering whatsoever. true or untrue? i think— covering whatsoever. true or untrue? i think from _ covering whatsoever. true or untrue? i think from the evidence you can see i was wearing helmet and goggles. so see i was wearing helmet and i0. iles. , see i was wearing helmet and roules. , ., see i was wearing helmet and nonles. , ., ., goggles. so is it true or not true that in the _ goggles. so is it true or not true that in the collision _ goggles. so is it true or not true that in the collision in _ goggles. so is it true or not true that in the collision in the - that in the collision in the aftermath you were or were not wearing — aftermath you were or were not wearing a — aftermath you were or were not wearing a helmet? i was. aftermath you were or were not wearing a helmet? iwas. and goggles? _ wearing a helmet? i was. and no: ales? ., . wearing a helmet? i was. and goggles?- did - wearing a helmet? i was. and goggles?- did you - wearing a helmet? i was. and goggles?- did you ski| wearing a helmet? i was. and i goggles?- did you ski at all goggles? correct. did you ski at all that day without _ goggles? correct. did you ski at all that day without a _ goggles? correct. did you ski at all that day without a helmet? - goggles? correct. did you ski at all that day without a helmet? no. i goggles? correct. did you ski at all that day without a helmet? no. ? . goggles? correct. did you ski at all| that day without a helmet? no. ? is that day without a helmet? no. ? is that for that day without a helmet? thu ? is that for anonymity or for safety? that day without a helmet? no. ? is that for anonymity or for safety? it. that for anonymity or for safety? [11 is for that for anonymity or for safety? is for safety that for anonymity or for safety? tt is for safety primarily, i like when skiing to keep a low profile. you are asked _

skiing to keep a low profile. you are asked about... _ skiing to keep a low profile. you are asked about... let me back up even _ are asked about... let me back up even further~ — are asked about... let me back up even further. he told me you learn to ski _ even further. he told me you learn to ski at— even further. he told me you learn to ski at alta. i even further. he told me you learn to ski at alta.— even further. he told me you learn to ski at alta._ tell i to ski at alta. i did actually. tell me about _ to ski at alta. i did actually. tell me about that. _ to ski at alta. i did actually. tell me about that. my _ to ski at alta. i did actually. tell me about that. my father - to ski at alta. i did actually. tell i me about that. my father loved to skiinu and me about that. my father loved to skiing and he _ me about that. my father loved to skiing and he had _ me about that. my father loved to skiing and he had learned - me about that. my father loved to skiing and he had learned later. me about that. my father loved to skiing and he had learned later in| skiing and he had learned later in life and so he was determined for my brother and i to learn to ski when we were young. and he used to do these sweet one—on—one ski trips where he would take us to various destinations and also was one. then he died young- _ destinations and also was one. then he died young. unfortunately - destinations and also was one. then he died young. unfortunately yes. i destinations and also was one. then | he died young. unfortunately yes. in his 50s. that's _ he died young. unfortunately yes. in his 50s. that's how _ he died young. unfortunately yes. in his 50s. that's how old _ he died young. unfortunately yes. in his 50s. that's how old i _ he died young. unfortunately yes. in his 50s. that's how old i am - he died young. unfortunately yes. in his 50s. that's how old i am in - he died young. unfortunately yes. in his 50s. that's how old i am in my i his 50s. that's how old i am in my 50s _ his 50s. that's how old i am in my 50s. �* , :: . his 50s. that's how old i am in my 505. �* , ii , �* , , his 50s. that's how old i am in my 50s. vii, �*, 50s. i'm in my 50s it's very young. did ou 50s. i'm in my 50s it's very young. did you stop _ 50s. i'm in my 50s it's very young. did you stop skiing _ 50s. i'm in my 50s it's very young. did you stop skiing for _ 50s. i'm in my 50s it's very young. did you stop skiing for a _ 50s. i'm in my 50s it's very young. did you stop skiing for a while? i l did you stop skiing for a while? i did. did you stop skiing for a while?

did. i was did you stop skiing for a while? i did. i was pretty devastated by did you stop skiing for a while? t did. i was pretty devastated by his death and just being... into being on the chairlift was difficult for me so i avoided it for a few years until i had my own kids and then i heard his voice in my head thinking, i should teach them how to ski. brad fall chuck, i should teach them how to ski. brad fall chuck. you _ i should teach them how to ski. brad fall chuck, you were _ i should teach them how to ski. brad fall chuck, you were dating him at the time _ fall chuck, you were dating him at the time and now married to him. were _ the time and now married to him. were you — the time and now married to him. were you skiing with the coldplay luy were you skiing with the coldplay guy according to ramon? no. who is the coldplay guy? i guy according to ramon? no. who is the coldplay guy?— the coldplay guy? i believe he is referrin: the coldplay guy? i believe he is referring to my _ the coldplay guy? i believe he is referring to my first _ the coldplay guy? i believe he is referring to my first husband i the coldplay guy? i believe he is i referring to my first husband chris martin. he is the singer and the guitar player and piano player in the ban coldplay. did guitar player and piano player in the ban coldplay.— guitar player and piano player in the ban coldplay. did this blending ofthe the ban coldplay. did this blending of the family _ the ban coldplay. did this blending of the family trip _ the ban coldplay. did this blending of the family trip have _ the ban coldplay. did this blending of the family trip have some - of the family trip have some significance to you? yes of the family trip have some significance to you? yes this was a si . nificant significance to you? yes this was a significant trip _ significance to you? yes this was a significant trip for _ significance to you? yes this was a significant trip for us. _ significance to you? yes this was a

significant trip for us. it _ significance to you? yes this was a significant trip for us. it was - significance to you? yes this was a significant trip for us. it was the i significant trip for us. it was the first time brad and i were introducing our kids and doing something together to see if we could blend families.— something together to see if we could blend families. there is an inflation at _ could blend families. there is an inflation at the _ could blend families. there is an inflation at the time _ could blend families. there is an inflation at the time of _ could blend families. there is an inflation at the time of this - inflation at the time of this collision _ inflation at the time of this collision you were distracted no. were ou collision you were distracted �*tfk were you paying attention to collision you were distracted “to were you paying attention to where you were _ were you paying attention to where you were skiing. no. was there an one you were skiing. no. was there anyone in _ you were skiing. thu was there anyone in front of you? know. there was some _ anyone in front of you? know. there was some implication that you were looking _ was some implication that you were looking up— was some implication that you were looking up at moses to be left while you were _ looking up at moses to be left while you were skiing downhill, were you doing _ you were skiing downhill, were you doing that? no. carrie 0akes of deer doing that? no carrie 0akes of deer valley to doing that? thu carrie 0akes of deer valley to something in her deposition about the kids wanting you to _ deposition about the kids wanting you to save them or something. were you to save them or something. were you in_ you to save them or something. were you in fact _ you to save them or something. were you in fact did you meet at the top of the _ you in fact did you meet at the top of the hill? — you in fact did you meet at the top of the hill? |

you in fact did you meet at the top of the hill?— of the hill? i think there were six in our group _ of the hill? i think there were six in our group plus _ of the hill? i think there were six in our group plus our— of the hill? i think there were six in our group plus our skiing - in our group plus our skiing instructor so we would always meet that day at the top of the chair and would kind of plot out every one's was going. the six people? myself, brad, my stepdaughter isabella, my daughter apple, brad, my stepdaughter isabella, my daughterapple, my brad, my stepdaughter isabella, my daughter apple, my son moses in my stepson brody. xtoll daughter apple, my son moses in my stepson lzerody-_ stepson brody. you had paid for each ofthe stepson brody. you had paid for each of the four kids _ stepson brody. you had paid for each of the four kids to _ stepson brody. you had paid for each of the four kids to have _ stepson brody. you had paid for each of the four kids to have their- of the four kids to have their own individual— of the four kids to have their own individual instructors? they of the four kids to have their own individual instructors?— individual instructors? they were all very different _ individual instructors? they were all very different levels _ individual instructors? they were all very different levels so - individual instructors? they were all very different levels so brad i all very different levels so brad paid for his kids and i paid for mine. " . paid for his kids and i paid for mine. ”~' . , ., , mine. the $1 that i will probably weave but — mine. the $1 that i will probably weave but not _ mine. the $1 that i will probably weave but not this _ mine. the $1 that i will probably weave but not this minute... i mine. the $1 that i will probably i weave but not this minute... were you planning to ski the whole day? i was. did you planning to ski the whole day? i was- did you — you planning to ski the whole day? i was. did you send _ you planning to ski the whole day? i was. did you send a _ you planning to ski the whole day? i was. did you send a little _ you planning to ski the whole day? i was. did you send a little text i was. did you send a little text after lunch? _ was. did you send a little text after lunch? yes. _ was. did you send a little text after lunch? yes. can - was. did you send a little text after lunch? yes. can you i was. did you send a little text. after lunch? yes. can you bring was. did you send a little text i after lunch? yes. can you bring this

u? d after lunch? yes. can you bring this u-? d110 after lunch? yes. can you bring this up? d110 is— after lunch? yes. can you bring this up? d 110 is the _ after lunch? yes. can you bring this up? d110 is the text. _ after lunch? yes. can you bring this up? d 110 is the text. any _ up? d 110 is the text. any objection? _ up? d 110 is the text. any objection? no. _ up? d 110 is the text. any objection? no. exhibit- up? d110 is the text. anyj objection? no. exhibit 110 up? d 110 is the text. any - objection? no. exhibit 110 received. these objection? exhibit 110 received. these are objection?- exhibit 110 received. these are somewhat _ objection?- exhibit 110 received. these are somewhat hard _ objection?- exhibit 110 received. these are somewhat hard to - objection?- exhibit 110 received. these are somewhat hard to see i objection?- exhibit 110 received. . these are somewhat hard to see and james _ these are somewhat hard to see and james will— these are somewhat hard to see and james will bring it up. 83 a is the better— james will bring it up. 83 a is the better copy. so do you have a defence — better copy. so do you have a defence binder? i better copy. so do you have a defence binder?— better copy. so do you have a defence binder? i 'ust have my deposition. _ defence binder? i 'ust have my deposition. ii defence binder? i 'ust have my deposition. iwilli defence binder? ijust have my deposition. i will hand - defence binder? ijust have my deposition. i will hand you i defence binder? ijust have my deposition. i will hand you this| deposition. i will hand you this binder, deposition. i will hand you this binder. can — deposition. i will hand you this binder, can we _ deposition. i will hand you this binder, can we move - deposition. i will hand you this binder, can we move to i deposition. i will hand you this binder, can we move to admit| deposition. i will hand you this i binder, can we move to admit 83 b. no objection. binder, can we move to admit 83 b. no objection-— no objection. defence exhibit a3 be

received. no objection. defence exhibit a3 be received- it — no objection. defence exhibit a3 be received. it is _ no objection. defence exhibit a3 be received. it is somewhat _ no objection. defence exhibit a3 be received. it is somewhat hard - no objection. defence exhibit a3 be received. it is somewhat hard to - received. it is somewhat hard to received. it is somewhat hard to receive -- _ received. it is somewhat hard to receive -- see- _ received. it is somewhat hard to receive -- see. i— received. it is somewhat hard to receive -- see. ithink— received. it is somewhat hard to receive -- see. i think we - received. it is somewhat hard to receive -- see. i think we need| received. it is somewhat hard to i receive -- see. i think we need to receive —— see. ithink we need to id receive —— see. ithink we need to go back_ receive —— see. ithink we need to go backiust — receive —— see. ithink we need to go backiust a _ receive —— see. ithink we need to go backjust a little more to put a date _ go backjust a little more to put a date on _ go backjust a little more to put a date on it — go backjust a little more to put a date on it. do you recall, texting anyone on— date on it. do you recall, texting anyone on the day? and this is your own personal cell phone copy. yes it is. and own personal cell phone copy. yes it is- and there — own personal cell phone copy. yes it is. and there is _ own personal cell phone copy. yes it is. and there is a _ own personal cell phone copy. yes it is. and there is a date. _ own personal cell phone copy. yes it is. and there is a date. sorry - own personal cell phone copy. yes it is. and there is a date. sorry does . is. and there is a date. sorry does about cepy. _ is. and there is a date. sorry does about copy, february _ is. and there is a date. sorry does about copy, february 24, - is. and there is a date. sorry does| about copy, february 24, february 26, about copy, february 24, february 26. 2016 — about copy, february 24, february 26. 2016 is— about copy, february 24, february 26,2016. is that in fact a true and correct _ 26, 2016. is that in fact a true and correct copy— 26,2016. is that in fact a true and correct copy of your phone screen? yes _ correct copy of your phone screen? yes who _ correct copy of your phone screen? yes who are — correct copy of your phone screen? yes. who are you texting with? eric christiansen — yes. who are you texting with? f" c christiansen the ski instructor. yes. who are you texting with? eric christiansen the ski instructor. so l christiansen the ski instructor. so we went down bandanna. so you had already— we went down bandanna. so you had already been down that very, oh my board _ already been down that very, oh my board in_ already been down that very, oh my board. in case this is a better

cow — eric is the green and i am the light. eric is the green and i am the liuht. ~ , ., .,~ eric is the green and i am the liuht.~ , ., ., , , light. we should take northside up that is you? _ light. we should take northside up that is you? that _ light. we should take northside up that is you? that is _ light. we should take northside up that is you? that is you? _ light. we should take northside up that is you? that is you? in - light. we should take northside up that is you? that is you? in the - that is you? that is you? in the afternoon. _ that is you? that is you? in the afternoon, let's go with the, keep going _ afternoon, let's go with the, keep going down, let's go over the left. so you _ going down, let's go over the left. so you are — going down, let's go over the left. so you are coordinating a little bit. so you are coordinating a little bit 0n— so you are coordinating a little bit. on the mountain in real time, correct? _ bit. on the mountain in realtime, correct? , , correct? yes. sorry james, moses wants to know — correct? yes. sorry james, moses wants to know if _ correct? yes. sorry james, moses wants to know if you _ correct? yes. sorry james, moses wants to know if you are - correct? yes. sorry james, moses wants to know if you are still- wants to know if you are still skiing and where. 50 wants to know if you are still skiing and where.— wants to know if you are still skiing and where. so it is 229 and no one is thinking _ skiing and where. so it is 229 and no one is thinking lawsuit - skiing and where. so it is 229 and no one is thinking lawsuit yet. - skiing and where. so it is 229 and| no one is thinking lawsuit yet. and that is_ no one is thinking lawsuit yet. and that is you — no one is thinking lawsuit yet. and that is you on the left and it says can you — that is you on the left and it says can you read it? it that is you on the left and it says can you read it?— can you read it? it says i came in and that guy sort _ can you read it? it says i came in and that guy sort of _ can you read it? it says i came in and that guy sort of hurt - can you read it? it says i came in and that guy sort of hurt me and| can you read it? it says i came in| and that guy sort of hurt me and i will get a massage at three. gigi is here if he wants to come. dg was

helping with the kids? yes she is our baby—sitter. did helping with the kids? yes she is our baby-sitter.— our baby-sitter. did you go in earlier because you _ our baby-sitter. did you go in earlier because you had - our baby-sitter. did you go in earlier because you had been| our baby-sitter. did you go in - earlier because you had been hit? yea _ earlier because you had been hit? yes. , , ., earlier because you had been hit? yes. , .,, earlier because you had been hit? yes. , , ., , ., ., yes. did you personally pay for a ski ass yes. did you personally pay for a ski pass at _ yes. did you personally pay for a ski pass at deer _ yes. did you personally pay for a ski pass at deer valley? - yes. did you personally pay for a ski pass at deer valley? i - yes. did you personally pay for a ski pass at deer valley? i did. i yes. did you personally pay for a l ski pass at deer valley? i did. was it a full day — ski pass at deer valley? i did. was it a full day pass? _ ski pass at deer valley? i did. was it a full day pass? it _ ski pass at deer valley? i did. was it a full day pass? it was. - ski pass at deer valley? i did. was it a full day pass? it was. and - it a full day pass? it was. and is the monetary — it a full day pass? it was. and is the monetary difference - it a full day pass? it was. and is l the monetary difference between it a full day pass? it was. and is - the monetary difference between the two passes more than $1? it is. ms. van norman — two passes more than $1? it is. ms. van norman said _ two passes more than $1? it 3 ms. van norman said when you were allegedly— van norman said when you were allegedly hit were you hit? i was hit. the definition _ allegedly hit were you hit? i was hit. the definition of _ allegedly hit were you hit? i was hit. the definition of an - allegedly hit were you hit? i was hit. the definition of an assault| hit. the definition of an assault is an unauthorised _ hit. the definition of an assault is an unauthorised touching. - hit. the definition of an assault is an unauthorised touching. did - hit. the definition of an assault is an unauthorised touching. did mr| an unauthorised touching. did mr sanderson— an unauthorised touching. did mr sanderson touch you? in an

unauthorised manner? ob'ection. studio: unauthorised manner? ob'ection. srumo: anotherfi unauthorised manner? objection. studio: another approach - unauthorised manner? objection. studio: another approach by - unauthorised manner? objection. studio: another approach by the | studio: another approach by the lawyers there. some discussion about how she was touched by mr sanderson and whether or not it was an assault, and unauthorised manner. gwyneth paltrow has reiterated multiple times that she was the victim of the ski crash as she began her evidence. she said she did not believe the testimony of previous witnesses and that her version of events was categorically the truth. sounds back let's did he touch you without your permission, the sexual part that is just a split second, you are thinking what is going on here? yes. thinking what is going on here? yes, i was trying — thinking what is going on here? yes, i was trying to _ thinking what is going on here? yes, i was trying to put — thinking what is going on here? yes, i was trying to put together what could possibly be happening behind me.