welcome to hardtalk, from prague, i'm stephen sackur. how solid is put in's home front? welcome to hardtalk. vladimir putin hoped that europe's determination to stand

with ukraine after russia's invasion would not last. he counted on a winter energy crisis and economic disruption to weaken european resolve. has that happened 7 well, my guest today is the newly elected president of the czech republic, petr pavel. now, he is a former nato general and a staunch ally of ukraine. so, is europe still ready and willing to do whatever it takes to back kyiv? president petr pavel, welcome to hardtalk. thank you very much. i must start, mr president, by congratulating you on your recent inauguration. but i must admit, it doesn't really make sense that you are sitting here with me as president of the czech republic because, just a few short years ago, you said, "i am a soldier at heart. "i do not intend to transform into the role of a politician."

so, what happened? every soldier is used to serve his country and wherever one sees that his country is in danger, it's like a call — a call of duty. so, i saw my own country being threatened by populism and there was a quite serious risk that our future president will be very similar to what is viktor orban for hungary and i simply didn't want something like that to happen to my country. the ukraine war was also a big factor in the election campaign. mr babis accused you of being — and i use his own word — a "w a rm onger" he said that your support for ukraine, your belief that ukraine should get more weapons, more financial support from the european union, was actually prolonging the war. a number of czech people still appear to believe he was right.

not just czech people. you will find a lot of people thinking the same way in other countries of the region, as well as in western europe. but what is fair to say that being for peace doesn't mean that you will find yourself in peace. in general, what andrej babis was saying, "i don't want war. "i want peace." who wouldn't want peace? as an ex—military, i was in a number of wars, so i know very well what the wars are about, how much suffering they bring — not only to soldiers, but primarily to the civilians — and i would never draw my own country into the war. but, as the old saying says, if you want peace, get ready for war. and sometimes, when the war breaks out, we simply have to fight.

we are lucky in our part of europe that we don't have to fight physically. but one of our partners is under a serious threat. all the foundations of our societies are under serious threat. so, the least thing that we can do is to support the country that is subject to aggression. there's an irony here, though, isn't there? you say this is about defending europe's values, freedom and democracy. many czech people remember that you were a loyal communist through the 1980s. you served in the military when it was essentially defending the soviet empire. you were, even for a time, in military intelligence, and many czechs wonderjust how real and how deep is your conversion to these values of freedom and democracy? let's first question the word �*loyal�*. in this country, there

were more than 1.5 million members of the communist party. not all of them were what you would call loyal. they were members of the communist party simply because they were born to the system, they lived in it. they had no comparison with the outer world and they simply believed that this is the right way to do. did you at that time, as a man in his 20s wearing the uniform of czechoslovakia, were you an ideological communist? well, i was never an ideological communist. i was convinced that my duty was to serve my country as a soldier. that's what i was trained for — to defend the country against whoever would attack it. and i was always told that my role is to

defend, not to attack. and, of course, i didn't take it as a defence of communist party or the general secretary of the communist party. i was always thinking about people i loved, about the places i loved, the way of life, we lived in our personal life. this is what was main purpose for me as a soldier. yeah, so you — i mean, let's not beat around the bush. you basically were committed to the defence of a deeply repressive, authoritarian system. and now, here you sit in the presidential office advocating more arms, more weaponry for president zelensky and kyiv in their fight against an authoritarian, repressive regime. that is quite a u—turn, is it not? no, i don't see it that way. i see it as a slow transition because, in the �*80s, i was slowly learning that what the system was teaching us for years is not that correct, that there are things that were either omitted or distorted, or direct lies, and the level of frustration

was growing. and it ended up by november 1989, which was not the end of the world that i lived in — it was rather relief that all this awkward situation ended up peacefully without any bloodshed. well, if we can then fast—forward to today and reflect on the journey, you now seem to be advocating more weapons, whatever it takes to ensure the complete, as you put it, the complete territorial victory of ukrainian forces over every inch of their own soil. how much more do you think the europeans, as well as the americans, can and should give? i am not that idealistic that i

would believe this is the best of our potential scenarios. it's the best one i would wish to ukraine because they deserve it. but reality is quite often different from our wishes and dreams. so, what i am advocating right now is let's give ukraine whatever they need for successful defence and potentially for successful counteroffensive. yeah, i mean, with respect, you say, "i'm not advocating "something that's impossible," but you have said that the goal should be the restoration of ukraine's territorial integrity. it seems pretty clear to me what that means. that's correct, because if we want to protect the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, international law, this is the only thing that we have to strive for.

just seems to me that as a former nato general, you feel a sense of urgency here because not long ago, you referred to a window of opportunity that is open, you said, for this coming year, 2023. but you suggested that if ukraine doesn't achieve significant, maybe decisive military victories in 2023, then that window of opportunity and, indeed, the resolve of europeans to keep arming and supporting ukraine, that may dwindle away. is that your concern? exactly. i believe that this year may be decisive for both sides because both russia and ukraine would most probably try to make a really big offensive, getting control over more and more ground.

and when we consider how much time and resources does it take to prepare for a large offensive operation, i really don't see any opportunity for a second or third chance this year. next year, it will be more complicated because the support of ukraine will naturally fade out, not only... really? that's an extraordinary thing to say — "support for ukraine will naturally fade out". i mean, if vladimir putin is listening to us talking or happens to see it on the tv, that is something that he will be thrilled to hear. it only takes an objective view on the reality. when we look at the level of support in a number of countries, it slowly goes down, and it's linked to... is it going down in this country? well, it is, as in any other, because the longer it takes, the lower the support will be. that's because of fatigue of war. it's not only with the fighting countries, it's with all supporting countries because, from the very beginning, the horror of war ignites

everyone for support. just a few hundred yards from here, a few weeks ago, there was a rally. thousands — not so many thousands, but a few thousand — people gathered to demand an end to czech support for ukraine. they demanded an early end to the war. some of them wore z symbols, indicating their sympathies for russia. what's your message to them? first, by supporting ukraine, we are helping ourselves because if we leave it unattended, if we leave it without any support, russia and the rest of the countries now supporting ukraine would do the same, then russia would most probably prevail in ukraine. russia would take it as a confirmation of the right approach to their foreign

and security policies. and as we heard openly from their top representatives, russia wouldn't stop with ukraine. see, there are nearby countries — friends of yours, i was going to say, but clearly the word �*friend' is wrong now — but formerfriends of yours in hungary, for example, a member of the visegrad 4 group, along with you in the czech republic and slovakia, and poland — hungary takes a very different view. viktor 0rban, the prime minister, says that europeans are, in effect, "fanning the flames of this conflict. "they are prolonging this conflict with their anti—russia "stance. "

and he says, "no way will hungaryjoin the weapons "supply to ukraine. " and they will, in fact, continue their energy cooperation, their economic cooperation with vladimir putin. is it time to reconsider hungary's position inside the european union? well, through the history of the eu and nato, a number of countries went throug the periods of, let's say, democratic deficit. it's not there forever, viktor 0rban will not represent hungary forever, and the situation may change. i strongly believe that hungary belongs both to the eu and nato and we have to work with the current leadership from the position of common interest. a number of areas are without any conflict, but we have a serious disagreement in foreign and security policy. see, just a few years ago, this visegrad 4 group was seen as a rising power bloc within the european union. now, the visegrad 4 group is effectively dead because your position

here in prague is so very different from viktor 0rban�*s in hungary. and the eu commission, the eu parliament have for years now been locked in a confrontation with hungary, where they say that hungary is violating fundamental european values when it comes to all sorts of things — from corruption to the independence of the judiciary, to the treatment of minorities. there is, hanging over hungary, the possibility of severe eu punishments and, theoretically, the possibility of expulsion. well, i am fully behind the restriction that the eu put on hungary with regard to funding a number of projects because this funding is based on sharing common values and principles and if a country doesn't follow these common principles, then how could they be entitled to get money from a common budget?

i support it but, at the same time, when i look at the v4, i don't have any exaggerated ambition. i believe that v4 is a good forum for consultation on issues where we can agree. we don't have to push it necessarily into the domain of a full integration of foreign and security policy and if we don't have these exaggerated ambitions, then the look at the v4 is quite acceptable. let's bring this conversation back to vladimir putin and the threat that you believe he poses to european security and european values. back in 2014, there were two big explosions at czech republic arms depots. since then, the czechs

and other western intelligence agencies have firmly pointed the finger of blame at russian military intelligence. today, do you believe that russian intelligence is still working covertly to destabilise and undermine the czech republic? i do — and notjust czech republic. russian intelligence, both civilian and military, are very active in a number of countries. if the russians were really good at something, it was espionage, one of the areas. and russian intelligence is very active all around the world, wherever they have their interest, and quite obviously in the countries of the eu and nato. we're sitting in your temporary accommodation as president of the czech republic.

prague castle, which is where your office is supposed to be, has been off limits to you for a number of weeks because apparently, there is a realfear that the russians have electronic surveillance equipment that they've managed to place inside that building, and it's being electronically cleansed. is that true? i wouldn't go that far but i think one should always be cautious. and with regard to some people who were very close to president milos zeman — one of them being very close to russia — i believe that it's quite natural, that — it's good to have concerns. that's why i would rather use a preventive check, technical check before i move in with my team. all right, so just to go back to an earlier part

of our conversation, when you were talking about what you see as the dangers of the populist nationalist trend in the czech republic — are you saying that mr babis — who, of course, was prime ministerfor a long time and challenged you for the presidency — and mr zeman, who was president — both of whom in different ways were described as czech populists — are you saying that they, in essence, at the very least turned a blind eye to russian covert activity in this country? i wouldn't say both, because andrej babis in his role of prime minister actually took concrete steps to cut russian influence in the czech republic. but milos zeman at that time was, by his views, more on russian side than on the side of our western allies. he ignored a number of warnings. he ignored the reports not only

from our intelligence services, but also from our partners. he was putting doubts on the investigation results, suggesting that there are potentially more options of this event. so it was quite clear that president zeman at that time was more on the side of president putin. we've talked a lot about russia. let's talk briefly about china and taiwan. you made a very conscious decision in the days after you became president of the czech republic, you had a phone call with the president of taiwan. in fact, i think it's right to say you're europe's first elected head of state to speak direct to the taiwanese

president. why did you do that? well, first, there was a request from the taiwanese side to have such a phone call. i take it as a matter of courtesy to accept congratulations... with respect, that taiwanese request will have been made to plenty of other european heads of state in the past, and it's been rebuffed. why did you say yes? i was very cautious to consult this phone call with our government because obviously, the government and foreign ministry are guarantors of ourforeign policy. the phone call and the arguments made within the phone call were fully consistent with our policy of one china and there is no contradiction in having a phone call. well, it has been deeply criticised by officials in beijing — and you knew it would be — but you said this to the financial times — you said, "let us be clear.

"china and its current regime — not compatible with western "democracies in their strategic goals and their principles." your message to fellow western leaders seems to be, "we need to get real. "china is a fundamental threat to us and we need to begin "the process of cutting our ties to china." is that your message? no, no. the first part is correct, second not. let's be aware what china is about. china and chinese long—term strategic interests and their values are not compatible with ours. their interest is in global dominance. their interest is to rewrite international order, adjust the norms of international trade to fit more to china's interests. there is nothing wrong on having good contacts with china, doing business

with china, but we should always be aware that china is not on our side. china has its own interests and we shouldn't give china a chance to dictate the rules. let's end, if i may, where we began — talking about notjust the czech republic and its politicalfuture, but the future of this particular region. in the presidential election campaign, you said, "populism "is the problem of our time and that is what i intend "to address." well, here you are, sitting in the presidential palace. the truth is, populism in eastern europe is not going away. we see it in hungary, we see it in poland. we also see that in this country, mr babis, whom we've talked about, remains a powerful political

force and some polls show that his party is actually the most popular party in the czech republic today. how do you intend to win your battle against populism here? let me remind you that this populism is notjust a problem for this part of europe. we saw a huge wave of populism in the united states just a couple of years ago. we saw it in the uk before brexit, a number of a number of countries, as well, so populism is a threat to democracies in general. the only way how to go out of this trap is a slow and very patient process of telling people the truth, building the arguments on measurable effects, and slowly getting back the confidence of people that was lost over time. it's always much easier to give thousands of promises without delivering, it's much more complicated to restore the confidence shattered by populists over a number of years, but it may

prove to be successful from time to time. we'll come back and we'll see. but for now, president petr pavel, i thank you very much for being on hardtalk. thank you for me being your guest. hello.

with record arctic air with slow during sunday in the court there will be with us to start there will be with us to start the new week. monday, shiny and bright, very short lived because of tuesday onwards, it turns wetter and windy again and much milder thanks to atlantic low—pressure systems. atla ntic low— pressure systems. the cfi atlantic low—pressure systems. the cfi pressure will bring us a fine day for monday and quarter mass of the blue colours and a frosty start for many and still some winter showers affecting areas of ice seer and fog will fade away into the afternoon in the odd shower here there but most places to stay dry and interest reaching highs around seven to 10 degrees. we could be up to 11 degrees in the southwest is cloud and breeze pick—up yeah. start to see temperatures that will pick up around western

areas with the cord air into snow of the high ground and a chilly start across eastern england. tuesday, we are very much dominated by low pressure in this weather from bringing outbreaks of rain. you can see the white colours indicating transient snow as it spreads northwards and generally it is going to be a cloudy breezy day without outbreaks of rain and drier interludes at times. and temperatures will be lifting up to 12 degrees in the west and still quite cool across more eastern areas and on wednesday, we will see some very mild air indeed around this area of low pressure. yellow and orange starting to push northwards and eastwards every month start to the day on wednesday with a lot of cloud around in them to brightness and optics of rain spilling up from the south on the west and moving and some of the west and moving and some of the will be quite heavy at times. temperatures in the mid—teens from many of us and double figures across scotland

too. states and settled for friday and showers with thursday, friday will see important areas of low pressure across the country to bring a risk of dales and it looks like on friday the risk of deals will be around southern and western coasts will be windy on both days unsettled by both days very mild.

welcome to newsday, reporting live from singapore, i'm karishma vaswani. the headlines.. thousands of protestors take to the streets in israel — including outside the home of prime minister benjamin netanyahu injerusalam — after he sacks his defence minister for condemning his controversialjudicial reforms. this sacking of israel's defence minister who spoke out against the legislation here she feels too many people here like a turning point. warnings of more severe weather in mississippi — after a powerful tornado kills at least 26 people. two boats carrying migrants sink off the coast of tunisia. 29 people have died and others are still missing. and the campaigner who's run 200 marathons in the last year