live from london. this is bbc news donald trump has left florida and is on his way to new york, where he face charges related to alleged hush money payments to a pawn star. payments to a porn star. finland willjoin nato tomorrow — a day after the leader credited with steering its application lost a tight—run election. the moments before a pro—war blogger, was killed in an explosion in st petersburg. a 26—year—old woman is detained by russian authorities. and in afghanistan, my report inside the taliban's aggressive campaign to round up drug addicts and force them into rehab — in an attempt to dry them out.

there's been much talk over the last few weeks on the future of artificial intelligence, with the introduction of technology such as microsoft—backed chat—gpt, a chatbot which can write essays and solve computer coding. concerns have been raised over privacy, the spreading of misinformation — with calls to pause development over safety fears. there is also concern about al's impact on employment. a report from investment bank goldman sachs said ai could replace the equivalent of 300 million full—time jobs. but it added widespread use of ai could eventually increase the total annual value of goods and services produced globally by 7%. we can speak now to eric schmidt, former ceo of google. thank you forjoining us. i know

you've been following this and working on this for a long time. how concerned should we be? great working on this for a long time. how concerned should we be?— working on this for a long time. how concerned should we be? great to see ou aaain. concerned should we be? great to see you again- - — concerned should we be? great to see you again- - we _ concerned should we be? great to see you again. . we should _ concerned should we be? great to see you again. . we should be _ concerned should we be? great to see you again. . we should be incredibly l you again. . we should be incredibly optimistic and worried at the same time. the arrival of the new power in terms of solving climate change, science, health and getting people educated and entertained, new forms of human existence are profound. the concerns are very real. what happens if it's been misused with mark what's up and if a osama bin laden like kherson gets access to the store was close the instances of proliferation are worrying. i store was close the instances of proliferation are worrying.- proliferation are worrying. i was auoin to proliferation are worrying. i was going to ask _ proliferation are worrying. i was going to ask you _ proliferation are worrying. i was going to ask you about - proliferation are worrying. i was going to ask you about the - proliferation are worrying. i was going to ask you about the instances of it and uses a weapon of war? today, were time people are operates in old models of world war i and world war ii. if you look at

ukraine, you can see new techniques on the ukraine side like using joan. most people aren't using it either way could be offensively and defensively. you could imagine an attack where you ask one of the systems to break into another system. you could see defensive systems where they ask a defence against other guys breaking in. but it is still too new. in against other guys breaking in. but it is still too new.— it is still too new. in terms of that. if it is still too new. in terms of that if you — it is still too new. in terms of that. if you programme - it is still too new. in terms of that. if you programme ai . it is still too new. in terms of that. if you programme al to | it is still too new. in terms of i that. if you programme al to do that, are you able to control it? it's under our control today because they're asking —— because it's asking what we asked her to do. even though we roughly don't see how it works it is roughly doing what we ask you to do. at some point in the future, not soon, maybe five or ten

or 15 years, it's probable that the systems can do things on their own. at that point i think we need to be conscious of what we want them to do and how do make sure they don't go off the reels where they're choosing more problems to solve. not today, but certainly in our future our lifetimes. but certainly in our future our lifetime— but certainly in our future our lifetimes. ., ,, ., , , but certainly in our future our lifetimes. ., ,, . , , ., lifetimes. lou susan -- was seen a few tech leaders _ lifetimes. lou susan -- was seen a few tech leaders sign _ lifetimes. lou susan -- was seen a few tech leaders sign a _ lifetimes. lou susan -- was seen a few tech leaders sign a letter - few tech leaders sign a letter saying that we should pause the developments in look at these programmes. is that timeline enough? the concern is legitimate but the tactics are not. if you pause this than other countries like china in particular it would get a rather than pausing for six months we should use is called as a cause for putting in systems that we trust will keep us safe. the term everyone is using now is guard rails and making sure the guardrails are in place and can be taken off. the current most powerful systems have very sophisticated boundaries, if

you would've, which are imposed on them by the companies that build them. that needs to continually get stronger and stronger. in them. that needs to continually get stronger and stronger.— stronger and stronger. in terms of ai. how stronger and stronger. in terms of ai- how far _ stronger and stronger. in terms of ai. how far ahead _ stronger and stronger. in terms of ai. how far ahead is _ stronger and stronger. in terms of ai. how far ahead is china? - stronger and stronger. in terms of ai. how far ahead is china? we i ai. how far ahead is china? we believe that _ ai. how far ahead is china? - believe that america and the uk to believe that america and the uk to be honest are ahead of china by some amount. we know this because if you look at the highest paper and most inefficient influential work it's being done by western universities and western players. there's every reason to believe that china understands this and is working hard to catch up. they want to dominate ai by 2030 and that's not very long from now and they have the money and power in scientist to catch up. do ou power in scientist to catch up. do you believe they can? i _ power in scientist to catch up. do you believe they can? i believe . you believe they can? i believe china is perfectly _ you believe they can? i believe china is perfectly capable - you believe they can? i believe china is perfectly capable of. you believe they can? i believe i china is perfectly capable of doing it. there's one vetted i think people don't appreciate about the

west. we have free speech and one thing we know about the large language models, we can't restrict their speech. they can see anything. i would be hard to believe that chinese government would allow such an uncontrolled buttocks for the publishing of china. that may give us temporary benefit. what publishing of china. that may give us temporary benefit.— us temporary benefit. what about regulations? _ us temporary benefit. what about regulations? he _ us temporary benefit. what about regulations? he taught _ us temporary benefit. what about regulations? he taught there - us temporary benefit. what about | regulations? he taught there about the uk, british officials have said we like behind the eu and the us when it comes to regulation. i would like toniuht when it comes to regulation. i would like tonight i — when it comes to regulation. i would like tonight i would _ when it comes to regulation. i would like tonight i would like _ when it comes to regulation. i would like tonight i would like to _ when it comes to regulation. i would like tonight i would like to know- like tonight i would like to know what the goal of revelation is. right now, the industry trying to figure out what these things can do and then have a set of principles around limiting them. to have the government come in and write a rule about regulation which is what the are trying to do right now without understanding exactly what these things can do with only four salt which are innovation. premature regulation is as bad as late revelation. you want to allow the

industry to invent the technology and understand its power and do it in a way that's transparent to the government and the governments can react. eventually, ithink government and the governments can react. eventually, i think this stuff will be regulated and we will look back on the spirit as a relatively calm. because there are only a few constant companies that are under western countries. they were legal and legitimate players and were sued to death and other things that happen with corporations. i things that happen with corporations.— things that happen with corporations. things that happen with cororations. ., ., , ., corporations. i want to get your reaction to — corporations. i want to get your reaction to it _ corporations. i want to get your reaction to it it's _ corporations. i want to get your reaction to it it's at _ corporations. i want to get your reaction to it it's at friday - corporations. i want to get your reaction to it it's at friday to . corporations. i want to get your| reaction to it it's at friday to ban chat gpt. 50 reaction to it it's at friday to ban chat gpt. ,, ., reaction to it it's at friday to ban chat gpt. , , ., ., chat gpt. so the basis of that really was something - chat gpt. so the basis of that really was something that - chat gpt. so the basis of that | really was something that was brought in and broadly achieved and europeans are pleased with that for some one of the things that are forgotten is that this rule and others benefited the convents like google which hurt innovation. you want to be careful about these plans. it has some good goals but the implications were so—so. i think in and chat gpt they will work it

out and make some changes and make sure they are not holding personal information in between sessions and i think it would be resolved. m50 i think it would be resolved. also the goldman _ i think it would be resolved. also the goldman sachs _ i think it would be resolved. also the goldman sachs resort report that says that 300 million times jobs will be at risk. do you think that's a fair assessment? 0r will be at risk. do you think that's a fair assessment? or is that borderline hysteria about something. i love this jobs are going away hysteria because it's been true for my whole life and technology. let me observe that right now in most of the developed nations. you can't get people to take jobs that are offered to them. they don't want to do them. the best way to solve that problem is to make those jobs more interesting by helping automate them so i don't agree with the premises. i think the sum of outcome, there will be not of change and some drugs will be not of change and some drugs will go away and new ones created by the fact of the matter is that on balance under next 20 or 30 years we would have not enough people to do the jobs would have not enough people to do thejobs problem. some of it is

would have not enough people to do the jobs problem. some of it is also demographics for sub population is declining in a number of key countries in the replacement ratios are now lower and we need more people and since we are not making more people, we would have to meet them more productive using these tools is the best way to make people more productive.— more productive. always fascinates to talk to you _ more productive. always fascinates to talk to you eric. _ more productive. always fascinates to talk to you eric. thank _ more productive. always fascinates to talk to you eric. thank you - more productive. always fascinates to talk to you eric. thank you so . to talk to you eric. thank you so much for _ to talk to you eric. thank you so much forjoining _ to talk to you eric. thank you so much forjoining us. _ to talk to you eric. thank you so much forjoining us. thank - to talk to you eric. thank you so much forjoining us. thank you i to talk to you eric. thank you so . much forjoining us. thank you very much. we turn now to finland, and the news that their bid to join nato is about to become reality. nato's secretary general, said the country will officially become a member of the �*military alliance' on tuesday. it's been fast—tracked because of russia's invasion of ukraine. here'sjens stoltenberg making the announcement from brussels. this is a historic week. tomorrow, we will welcome finland as the 31st member of nato, making finland safer and our alliance stronger. we will raise the finnish flag for the first time here at the nato headquarters.

it will be a good day for finland's security, for nordic security and nato as a whole. well the news comes hot on the heels of the results of the finnish election. prime minister sanna marin was credited with steering the country to nato membership. but she's just lost what was a pretty tight election to the leader of finland's main centre—right party — petteri 0rpo — who's now likely to be the country's new prime minister. his national coalition party won 20.8% of the vote — with the right wing populist finns party coming in a close second — with a record 20.1% share of the vote. it was a bitter defeat for prime minister, sanna marin's party, who trailed with 19.9% of the vote. i asked a former finish premise or about the outcome of the vote. have about the outcome of the vote. have a listen. i think this election was not so

much about security policy because everyone seems to agree but it was about economic policy in many ways and i assume that the voters in finland wanted some change. i think i had always been a advocate of nato finish unlike lake and mine. keep challenae finish unlike lake and mine. keep challenge you _ finish unlike lake and mine. keep challenge you as _ finish unlike lake and mine. keep challenge you as well. _ finish unlike lake and mine. keep challenge you as well. we - finish unlike lake and mine. keep challenge you as well. we are - finish unlike lake and mine. keep challenge you as well. we are we| challenge you as well. we are we were good _ challenge you as well. we are we were good friends _ challenge you as well. we are we were good friends actually. - challenge you as well. we are we were good friends actually. we . were good friends actually. we were then and still are but i think the most important thing to keep in mind is that national coalition party has always been the most international party in finland and always been prone nato and pro—transatlantic and pro—eu. as a matter of fact, it had to stay out of government during the cold war because it was also anti—soviet. finnish politics, as i said, when it comes to security policies is quite boring and we are quite united in our drive towards

nato membership at the moment. {line nato membership at the moment. one more question on it sent out my she was a millennium and wore those leatherjackets was a millennium and wore those leather jackets to artificial gatherings and known for those party videos. she residues registered outside of finland.— outside of finland. yeah, definitely. _ outside of finland. yeah, definitely. of— outside of finland. yeah, definitely. of course, - definitely. of course, internationally minded myself and am always happy when the finnish prime minister, no matter which political caller, is looked upon in a positive light around the world. so it, in that sense, i think she was very good for finland internationally. lets talk about finland becoming the 31st member of nato. i will quote 3ist member of nato. i will quote what russia's deputy foreign minister has said it following mr stoltenberg sentiment. he said in the event that the forces and resources of other nato members are deployed in finland, we will take additional steps to reliably ensure

russia's military security. it hasn't specified that butjens stoltenberg talked about and then becoming a safer country. does finland feel— becoming a safer country. does finland feel safer _ becoming a safer country. does finland feel safer today? - finland feel safer today? definitely. i think what we are just hurt their is the quote is exactly what we expected and what we heard when we applied for nato membership. i do think this is a win—win situation for finland, for the baltic sea region and the alliance. remember that we have one of the larger standing armies in europe. we have 900,000 men and women in reserved so we can mobilise 280,000 in wartime and a of f—18 fighter jets and one of the more specific instigated defence missile systems. so in that sense, it need to become stronger and the baltic sea area become stronger in finland becomes more secure. become stronger in finland becomes more secure-— more secure. that was alexander so seak

more secure. that was alexander so s - eak to more secure. that was alexander so speak to me — more secure. that was alexander so speak to me it _ more secure. that was alexander so speak to me it is _ more secure. that was alexander so speak to me it is a _ more secure. that was alexander so speak to me it is a bit _ more secure. that was alexander so speak to me it is a bit earlier- more secure. that was alexander so speak to me it is a bit earlier the - speak to me it is a bit earlier the former premise or of england. 0f # of finland. you're live with bbc news. today, the arena is officially handed over to the event organisers — the bbc eurovision team — so they can build the stage and the set. today starts the next chapter in the eurovision jersey. today starts the next chapter in the eurovisionjersey. irate today starts the next chapter in the eurovision jersey.— today starts the next chapter in the eurovision jersey. we are now in the build phase- — eurovision jersey. we are now in the build phase. there'll_ eurovision jersey. we are now in the build phase. there'll be _ eurovision jersey. we are now in the build phase. there'll be 37 - build phase. there'll be 37 different delegations here how difficult would it be to keep them happy. it’s difficult would it be to keep them ha . _ �* , ., difficult would it be to keep them ha“ _ �*, ., .,y difficult would it be to keep them hau. difficult would it be to keep them happy. it's a really fun “0b to workin: happy. it's a really fun “0b to working with i happy. it's a really fun “0b to working with the fi happy. it's a really fun job to working with the delegations happy. it's a really fun job to - working with the delegations and other_ working with the delegations and other ideas. we working with the delegations and other idea-— working with the delegations and other ideas. ~ ., :: , other ideas. we have 40 seconds of turning the — other ideas. we have 40 seconds of turning the stage _ other ideas. we have 40 seconds of turning the stage around _ other ideas. we have 40 seconds of turning the stage around during - other ideas. we have 40 seconds of turning the stage around during the| turning the stage around during the axe. this incredible machine, this incredible team of people will be moving the props on and off and

artisans on and off around the stage. artisans on and off around the state. �* �* , ., , artisans on and off around the state. �* �*, ., , stage. and here's how it is hoped it would look — stage. and here's how it is hoped it would look when _ stage. and here's how it is hoped it would look when the _ stage. and here's how it is hoped it would look when the eyes - stage. and here's how it is hoped it would look when the eyes of - stage. and here's how it is hoped it would look when the eyes of the i would look when the eyes of the world tuning for the final. you're live with bbc news. twitter has started removing verification badges from accounts which had a blue tick, after announcing that users would need a pay eight dollars a month to keep their blue badge status. take a look at this. it's the twitter account of the new york times. it used to have a blue tick, but it was removed after the us newspaper said, it would not pay to remain verified. it prompted this angry post from twitter�*s owner, elon musk, who said: "the real tragedy of @nytimes is that their propaganda, isn't even interesting". and other media organisations have seen changes too. last december, twitter introduced gold badges, like the one you can see here on the twitter page used by bbc news in the uk. these gold badges are used for business organisations rather than individuals. now twitter has said,

it will charge one thousand dollars a month for it. many news organisations including cnn, the los angeles times and the washington post, who have also said, they will not pay for twitter verification, still have their gold ticks for now. celebrities are caught up in it too. among those who have refused to pay, are the american basketball great — lebronjames. social media consultant matt navarra says this is an example of elon musk saying he's going to do something —— then doing something else. he said he was going to remove the 400,000 legacy verified blue ticks. he seems to have really only replaced one, removed one. and he's made everything a little bit tougher by making the description of what twitter verification is even more vague, by telling people, not telling people which people are verified and which people are paying to be verified. so more confusion on twitter. indeed, and it does feel quite shambolic what it is. all of this has been pretty shambolic.

and a lot of the things that elon says he's going to do, he doesn't do or he does, and then changees the sort of plan at things and add some nuance to it. and we still don't know if on the 15th of april, he says he's going to only show accounts you follow and accounts that are paying in the recommended for you algorithmic feed. but who knows? he might not do that either. ultimately, people aren't happy with all of these changes. i mean, frankly, i look at my twitter feed and i'm sort of confused about who i follow, who i don't follow, why there are more ads in my feed. it is. you know, people are not happy with twitter. and the usage of twitter is in my mind, is changed quite dramatically since he's taken over. news organisations are bailing out developers and now not wanting to develop the platform because of the cost of it. advertisers are pulling back and spending less. so it begs the question, what does elon musk have to pull out of the hat to turn this around? because at the moment it looks like it's more bad news for twitter.

but he has sort of promised to turn the company around, make it more profitable, make it more accessible, rather than something thatjust news organisations or politicians use. he has also promised a lot of other things and hasn't delivered on it. so it's really hard at this stage to understand what things he's promising are going to happen. you know, he's promised that he would start paying creators fortheir content, much like many other platforms. and that was going to have started many weeks ago and no one's seen any of that money coming forwards. he did deliver on the open sourcing of the algorithm to reveal a bit more about how the algorithm works, but as to how effective that will be in terms of making it a more profitable site is yet to be seen because i'm not sure. so you've got now the new york times with more than 55 million followers without a verification tick. exactly. you know, this is leaving accounts like the new york times and others open to impersonation. you know, some might argue, well, if it's that important to them about impersonation, then they should stump up the money and pay for it. that's one, you know, one for everyone else to decide

whether that's the case. it should be. but certainly by removing verification badges from well known brands in accounts that people use as trusted sources of news or information can only make twitter a less safe and less reliable source of news in the world. you said that people are going elsewhere. where are they going? well, this is one of the reasons why i think twitter is not going to completely implode overnight, because there aren't many alternatives to twitter that are quite the same. you know, there are if you have tik tok and tik tok was to be banned, you've got reels and you've got youtube with shorts. but with twitter there isn't a direct, easy equivalent. so it will be probably people will disperse themselves amongst a series of other apps and platforms, but there is no one killer replacement for twitter. and that's probably one of the only good things that maybe elon musk has going for him. yeah. i mean, that's part of the issue here, isn't it, that twitter does have a monopoly of that sort of space? it does. it hasn't got a direct competitor in that space. and there are many apps that have popped up that are trying to replicate the twitter experience and provide people with an alternative.

but of course, it doesn't have the scale. people are probably too addicted to the volume of retweets and likes and engagement that they do get on twitter, much as it might be toxic. so it's tricky. members of england's largest teaching union are to strike for another two days, after voting by an overwhelming majority to reject the latest pay offer from the government. the education secretary called it "extremely disappointing" and said it will result in more disruption for children. 0ur education editor, branwenjeffreys reports from harrogate, where the neu's annual conference is taking place. teachers arrived at conference today after four days of strikes, six days of pay talks, and waited to hear the latest on their dispute. the number of our members that rejected the government's pay offer is 191,319. the union leaders called for more negotiations. we want to say to parents that we don't want to take strike

action and we don't want to cause disruption to exam preparation. the strength of feeling here is clear. the vote to reject was overwhelming. the profession itself is furious, we are very angry at the offer. it's an insult to us. we really struggle to get science teachers because people don't want to do the job any more because unfortunately the amount of stress and workload for level of pay, we struggle to recruit in education. there is a promise to protect pupils facing exams. the unions say the offer is too far below the cost of living and not backed by enough funding for schools. if you talk to head teachers, they will look at their budget with you and they will say we can't afford to do this, we have to make cuts in order to make the pay rises. that's not good enough for the children of this country. england's schools will get more than 2 billion extra in cash and half a billion more next year to help with pay, but each school is also grappling

with many rising bills. energy bills, inflation, inflation on food. you know, just the general costs, the increase, just as for everybody else, the prices have gone up incredibly high for schools. in harrogate's valley gardens, parents absorbed the news of more strikes. it could mean i might lose out on money, i might lose out on just certain things, every day essentials, especially with the cost of living crisis. it's not fair for students who have got exams and study coming up, it's disruptive for them, and after all the pandemic and that. i i get it, frozen pay and that stuff, | but they can't expect in the current climate, you know, inflation linked | pay, it'sjust not going to happen. | and with spring local elections soon, party leaders also responded. their education has already suffered as a result of covid, and now they hear about new strike days in the face of a reasonable pay offer,

it is extremely disappointing. disappointed it's come to this and many parents will be worried about upcoming strikes. i want to see everybody getting round the table and resolving these issues. the sooner they are resolved, the better. the government will not engage and that meansl they are failing our children, our families and schools. - with no immediate prospect of talks, more strike dates could also be called for just before the summer holidays. the press call at nasa this afternoon, resembled something like the grand finale of x factor. except, the lucky winners, three american astronauts and one canadian, have been rewarded, not with a recording contract, but a perilous 10 day journey into deep space. ladies and gentlemen, your artemis to crew.

it is all part of nasa's ambitious plan to return the moon. artemis ii, as it's known, will launch as early as november 2024. it will be the first crewed mission to the moon since the final apollo flight in 1972. and here is the crew. american christina koch who set a record for the longest single spaceflight in history by a woman. jeremy hansen, the canadian, a formerfighter pilot who will make his first journey into space. victor glover, who tested aircraft for the navy, will be the man in the hot seat, piloting artemis ii. and the commander will be reid wiseman who served as a flight engineer aboard the international space station for expedition 41. let's hear from nasa administrator bill nelson. the artemis ii crew represents thousands of people working tirelessly to bring us to the stars. this is their crew. this is our crew. this is humanity's crew.

now here's the weather with elizabeth rizzini. hello there. good evening. glorious blue skies, plenty of spring sunshine across most of the uk today as illustrated by our weather watcher here in sunny doncaster. but cloudier skies across northern ireland with weather fronts out towards the west is spilling black cloud further eastwards. out towards the west just spilling black cloud further eastwards. 0ur weather fronts will all track further eastwards over the next few days. we're all likely to see more unsettled conditions as we head through the middle part of the week, but still lots of sunshine hanging on again tomorrow because our area of high pressure not too far away, it's out towards the east. it will slowly retreat as we head through the next few days or so, allowing these weather fronts to push further eastwards. but it's cloudy, it's breezy overnight tonight, there will be some outbreaks of rain across northern ireland and western scotland there. so here it will feel milder, clear skies across eastern scotland and down through much of england and eastern wales, too, where temperatures could possibly drop to slightly below freezing. so there'll be a touch of frost into tuesday morning.

certainly it is another chilly start to the day. now a weather front slowly moves its way eastwards as we head throughout the day on tuesday, introducing thickening cloud, i think for irish sea coast, outbreaks of rain for northern ireland and possibly for western scotland as well. that cloud spilling into eastern scotland by the end of the afternoon. so the rest of the sunshine, england and wales, top temperatures between 11 and 15 degrees celsius here. north sea facing coast, feeling a little milder than today. now, on wednesday, ourweatherfront has moved further eastwards. it's likely to give us some outbreaks of rain, particularly for western areas of the uk, but brightening up again towards the end of the afternoon across northern ireland. some sunny spells here our weather front will take its time to get towards south—east england. perhaps the rain arriving here by the end of the day. top temperatures again between 11 and 14 celsius at orjust slightly above the seasonal average for most. and then on thursday, the focus of the rain will be across eastern areas of the uk. this rain could pep up, it could be heavy and persistent for a time. but look, high pressure starts

to build in from the southwest as we head through good friday. and that is set to keep us largely dry as we head through the easter bank holiday weekend with possibly some rain approaching from the west as we head into bank holiday monday. but it will be rather cloudy, i think over the easter bank holiday weekend. it will also feel a little milder.

i hope he is scared, he should be scared. but his mind is constantly focused on one thing... how do i benefit donald trump? focused on one thing. .. how do i benefit donald trump?— focused on one thing... how do i benefit donald trump? while there ma be benefit donald trump? while there may be some _ benefit donald trump? while there may be some rabble-rousers - benefit donald trump? while there i may be some rabble-rousers thinking may be some rabble—rousers thinking about— may be some rabble—rousers thinking about coming to our city tomorrow, our message is clear and simple, control_ our message is clear and simple, control yourselves. this our message is clear and simple, control yourselves.— our message is clear and simple, control yourselves. this is a really murky incident. _ control yourselves. this is a really murky incident. it's _ control yourselves. this is a really murky incident. it's not _ control yourselves. this is a really murky incident. it's not really - murky incident. it's not really clear— murky incident. it's not really clear exactly _ murky incident. it's not really clear exactly who _ murky incident. it's not really clear exactly who was - murky incident. it's not really clear exactly who was behind | murky incident. it's not really- clear exactly who was behind this explosion — clear exactly who was behind this exlosion. a , clear exactly who was behind this exlosion. n, , , , clear exactly who was behind this exlosion. , , , , explosion. many experts believe it must be ukrainian _ explosion. many experts believe it must be ukrainian intelligence - must be ukrainian intelligence behind this attack. russian investigative committee thinks that russian opposition was also involved. , russian opposition was also involved-— russian opposition was also involved. . ., ., involved. this particular part of the bridge _ involved. this particular part of the bridge used _

involved. this particular part of the bridge used to _ involved. this particular part of the bridge used to be - involved. this particular part of the bridge used to be packed i involved. this particular part of. the bridge used to be packed with addicts. they are often huddled together,