we live in is in boulder we will be a assessing what this result means notjust here in turkey but around the (os live head) britain's biggest police force, the met, says it will no longer attend emergency calls involving mental heath issues unless there's a risk to life. we'll speak live to a former inspector of constabulary, who now chairs an nhs mental health trust. the head of ukraine's military intelligence has promised a "swift and starkly visible" response to russia's daytime missile attack on central kyiv. and chelsea have a new manager. mauricio pochetino is finally appointed — we'll have reaction. hello, i'm matthew amroliwala, welcome to verified live, three hours of breaking stories and checking out the truth behind them. turkey's president erdogan has secured another five years in power after winning the run—off ballot in the country's presidential election. these were some of the celebrations on the streets of istanbul as erdogan celebrated with his supporters after winning around 52% of the vote.

the 69—year—old will now serve another five years in office, potentially stretching his time in power to a quarter century. meanwhile, his opponent, kemal kilicdaroglu, said it was "the most unfair election in years" and that he felt saddened by the "troubles" awaiting turkey. live now to anna foster in istanbul: anna, in terms of unifying the country, does the president even want to? ~ ~ . v country, does the president even want to? ~ ~ ., �*, ., , want to? well i think that's a very aood want to? well i think that's a very good question. — want to? well i think that's a very good question, matthew- want to? well i think that's a very good question, matthew and - want to? well i think that's a very good question, matthew and i - good question, matthew and i think that's one that's quite difficult to answer at the moment. because when he made a speech yesterday evening you saw some of the pictures of the celebration on the street here in turkey last night. he talked about being a president for everybody in this country, notjust those who voted for him. then, he went on to be dispirited about the kurdish people, a huge part of the population here in turkey, he made

crude remarks about the lgbt q crude remarks about the lgbt 0 population. so what he said and what he did were actually polar opposites to each other. so i think that really does raise questions about whether he does want to try and unify this divided country. and the divide is deep. of course that margin was very narrow, 52% of people voted for presidentjuan. but remember, of course, there are the 48% who woke up this morning, and they have no representation. and the strength of feeling was such that all of these different opposition groups, all of these different parties, many of whom have different policies, different priorities, different visions for the future of turkey, for the first time they coalesced around a single candidate. i think a lot of people here, they think that might be a moment that may never be repeated, but it was a once—in—a—lifetime opportunity and it is one that fell short. i talked about there's a little early about theirs with the professor of political science here in istanbul, and he talked particularly about the opposition and what they do next.

that's actually quite a high possibility i think at some point. if he actually wants to throw his hat in the ring he actually has a strong chance of becoming the leader of the main opposition party and quite possibly could challenge them directly. , if the main opposition party had chosen him as itsjoint candidates, together with a number of opposition parties that are part of opposition parties that are part of the alliance, i think he would have received a much better result and this presidential election. but i think that chance was missed. anna, let's turn to the economy. is it clear to you the president has any sort of plan of how he tackles 40% plus inflation there in the country? 4096 plus inflation there in the count ? ~ , , country? well, he seems quite confident in _ country? well, he seems quite confident in the _ country? well, he seems quite confident in the way _ country? well, he seems quite confident in the way that - country? well, he seems quite confident in the way that he i country? well, he seems quite | confident in the way that he has been dealing with things already. he has faith in low interest rates, he thinks that will eventually do with

inflation. but our economy actually think that his financial management in the country has taken those problems, take in the financial crisis, taken the spiralling inflation, and made things even worse. they think that his choices have deepened an already critical situation. now it's also worth saying as well but the people that disagreed with him and the administration haven't lasted very long when it has come to that economic course that he has been charting. again, there is every chance that because he has won reelection here, because he got 52% of the vote, he will see that as an endorsement from the turkish people of the plan that he has already been executing. he talked about the economy. he referred to in her speech. he told the people in turkey that he would bring it under control, but really no detail about whether or not he will bring in a different plan and trying to do that. �* ., .,, different plan and trying to do that. �* ., , ., , that. anna foster, live in istanbul. thanks. thank _ that. anna foster, live in istanbul. thanks. thank you. _ that. anna foster, live in istanbul. thanks. thank you. now— that. anna foster, live in istanbul. thanks. thank you. now let's - that. anna foster, live in istanbul. thanks. thank you. now let's turn| that. anna foster, live in istanbul. l thanks. thank you. now let's turn to important story here in the uk. the biggest police force in the uk —

london's metropolitan police — says it will stop attending mental health incidents later this year in a bid to free—up officers and resources. officers currently respond to several hundred calls of this nature each month, but will now only attend where there's perceived to be an "immediate threat to life". our home affairs editor mark easton has more. it's actually been a very long concern of senior officers going right back to the age of austerity. i remember people were asking, you know, what are the police for? that means that they're being asked to to take on a lot of the responsibilities that had previously

some of the work suggest that the work going across the country in mental health is the equivalent capacity that could deal with 500,000 victims of domestic violence. the suggestion that officers will refuse to attend many calls relating to psychological crisis has alarmed a former inspector we'll speak live to a former inspector of constabulary, so so i'm alarmed. i want to see how this works. the model for what scotland yard is proposing is the right care right person scheme, adopted by police in humberside in 2020 in which officers do not attend a call if a mental health professional would be more appropriate. i professional would be more appmpriate-_ professional would be more auroriate. . ., , professional would be more a-ro-riate. ., ., , ., appropriate. i am not persuaded that this is the entirely _ appropriate. i am not persuaded that this is the entirely correct _ this is the entirely correct approach. what we know is that it is best for individuals and patients if

the nhs and the police work hand—in—hand to resolve this problem. hand-in-hand to resolve this problem-— hand-in-hand to resolve this roblem. ,, ., , problem. senior officers hope the inevitable arguments _ problem. senior officers hope the inevitable arguments about - problem. senior officers hope the inevitable arguments about the i inevitable arguments about the mental health proposal will encourage a political debate on how to ensure forces deal with societies priorities. we can speak now to zoe bellingham, former inspector of constabulary, now a chair of the norfolk and suffolk nhs foundation trust dealing with mental health issues. thank you so much for being here. on the programme. how alarmed are you by the suggestion? goad the programme. how alarmed are you by the suggestion?— by the suggestion? good evening, matthew. well. _ by the suggestion? good evening, matthew. well, i am _ by the suggestion? good evening, matthew. well, i am alarmed - by the suggestion? good evening, matthew. well, i am alarmed if. by the suggestion? good evening, matthew. well, i am alarmed if i l by the suggestion? good evening, l matthew. well, i am alarmed ifi am matthew. well, i am alarmed if i am being absolutely honest. it's partly because of the speed of which the threat to remove the met police from responding to people in crisis is being and efficient. i know that there are mental health trusts in london that won't be in a position to step into the vacuum that is

created if the police are indeed to step away from attending calls for people who are in mental health crisis. at the beginning, of a call where perhaps for the first time a loved one or a relative has gone into mental health crisis, it's very difficult tojudge into mental health crisis, it's very difficult to judge what the likely outcome is and whether or not there is a threat to life. that's why the police to attend. they are the first responders and their situation. and they have been for the last 14 years. this is nothing new. but i do have massive sympathy for the metropolitan police, and health services do need to be funded and resourced so that when the police do find individuals and take them to a place of safety in the nhs, there are doctors and there are nurses available to care for them in the right setting-— available to care for them in the right setting.- so _ available to care for them in the right setting. yes. so it is a dilemma, but _ right setting. yes. so it is a dilemma, but it _ right setting. yes. so it is a dilemma, but it does - right setting. yes. so it is a dilemma, but it does need to be resolved through talking to each other and partnership rather than ultimatums. find other and partnership rather than ultimatum-—

ultimatums. and you think that's what they say — ultimatums. and you think that's what they say is, _ ultimatums. and you think that's what they say is, do _ ultimatums. and you think that's what they say is, do you? - ultimatums. and you think that's i what they say is, do you? because are the police wrong to say that this is an absorbing increasing amounts of police time, not their priority, which is tackling crime? it's always been police as priority to protect us at the time of our greatest need, when we are most vulnerable, whether that is because we are at the victim of crime, and a road traffic accident, whether our child has gone missing somewhere. the police have always been there for us and they have turned out, and not exactly the same in mental health. but i do think that there is more that needs to be done to make sure that the police and mental health nurses, for example, as we heard, respond together so that the priority is taken away from the police. once that person has been identified, and assessment made on whether or not they are safe themselves or whether they need to be taken to a mental health setting where they can be looked after and treated. at that point, really, there is no argument at all. the

police should not be sitting for hours and hours with service users or patients an accident and emergency waiting for that facility to come available, but the mental health service and wales is absolutely filled to bursting in terms of being able to provide services to people with mental health. it really does need to be properly resourced. let health. it really does need to be properly resourced.— health. it really does need to be properly resourced. let me ask you two final questions, _ properly resourced. let me ask you two final questions, because - properly resourced. let me ask you two final questions, because we . properly resourced. let me ask you l two final questions, because we have the definition they are from the police saying they will only deal with situations where there is an immediate threat to life. do you fear that it will be left front line police officers to try to work out what is a very difficultjudgment to actually make? i do what is a very difficult 'udgment to actually makevh what is a very difficult 'udgment to actually makeah what is a very difficult 'udgment to actually match actually make? i do think it will be really hard- _ actually make? i do think it will be really hard- if _ actually make? i do think it will be really hard. if you _ actually make? i do think it will be really hard. if you think _ actually make? i do think it will be really hard. if you think about - really hard. if you think about people and police control centres, those that answer our 999 calls, you can imagine the calls that will be coming in. they will be distraught relatives, anxious friends, they

won't be able to make an assessment. either the friends them selves or the court handlers whether it's life or limb. and therefore i think there's a real danger that people who are in mental health crisis who are particularly vulnerable and won't receive the service they actually need. and the other problem of course matthew with this announcement today by the metropolitan police is come the end of august i think people across london will be wondering, well who honours do we call and the only number they know to call is 999? enter date that has been a number that has at least meant a police officer who will or been trained in mental health crisis situations turns up quickly and does all they possibly can to help that person in their hour of need. you possibly can to help that person in their hour of need.— possibly can to help that person in their hour of need. you lead me to m final their hour of need. you lead me to my final question, _ their hour of need. you lead me to my final question, which _ their hour of need. you lead me to my final question, which is - their hour of need. you lead me to my final question, which is would i my final question, which is would you appeal to the met commissioner to think again on there's, certainly about the timeframe, at least, and if the answer to that says no, he won't, what do you think of the

likely consequences? i won't, what do you think of the likely consequences?— won't, what do you think of the likely consequences? i know mark rile . i likely consequences? i know mark riley- l have _ likely consequences? i know mark riley. i have worked _ likely consequences? i know mark riley. i have worked with - likely consequences? i know mark riley. i have worked with him - likely consequences? i know mark riley. i have worked with him in i likely consequences? i know mark i riley. i have worked with him in the past. he's really sensible. he's got the best interest of london, it's absolutely heart. i expect the announcement today, has many reasons behind it which i won't speculate on, but one of which is that the public are talking about the need for there to be excellent mental health provision in london and i really hope that all of the partners, the help service, the police social care, sector and government will get around the table and sort the situation out. we government will get around the table and sort the situation out.— and sort the situation out. we will leave it there, _ and sort the situation out. we will leave it there, but _ and sort the situation out. we will leave it there, but a _ and sort the situation out. we will leave it there, but a really - leave it there, but a really important story and important to get your thoughts. thanks so much for joining us live here on the programme. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. grace spoke to me just moments before serving her customers

for the last time. she had to shut another venue last year, and now it's time for her to close this one. it's a really, really emotional day. the restaurant's been open forfour and a half years, but i've been running spice box as a street food business before that. so it's about seven years of hard work. and, yeah, it's sad. as food and utility prices rose and customer numbers fell, it became too difficult to stay open. people are struggling and there's less money to go around. and obviously, eating out is a luxury. but grace's story reflects many others in the capital, particularly in central london, where more than 500 venues have closed in the last three years. back in walthamstow, grace will now be selling her food to shops — one way to keep her brand alive at a time when it wasn't possible to keep her restaurants open. you're live with bbc news.

let's turn to the situation in ukraine. russia has mounted an unusual series of daytime strikes on the centre of the ukrainian capital kyiv, but the city's military administration says all were shot down and no targets were hit. this was the scene in the capital as that attack took place, people rushing to take cover, as explosions were heard in the sky above. this was last night. ukrainian military officials say that 66 out of roughly 75 cruise missiles and drones were intercepted. the latest bombardment was the 15th air attack on the capital this month alone. meanwhile, the governor of russia's belgorod region, which borders eastern ukraine, says ukraine's armed forces have been shelling several of its settlements. the governor said an industrial facility was hit in shebekino, wounding four people. our diplomatic correspondent

james landale is in kyiv. james, in terms of those strikes on the capital, we have seen a real uptick in the number of attacks that have been waged in this last month. just give us a sense of what the last 24 hours have been like. well, in some respects, _ last 24 hours have been like. well, in some respects, some _ last 24 hours have been like. well, in some respects, some of- last 24 hours have been like. well, in some respects, some of it - in some respects, some of it was very familiar. others, far less familiar. like so many people in kyiv, the night was broken by air raids, sounds of explosions, in the sky. as yet another air strike landed. it was targeted at key. as you say this is the 15th, 16th time this has happened this month. so clearly, russia targeting the capital more than it has done in recent months. but then again, this morning something unusual. two things, really. one was daytime strikes, but also strikes that seem to be centred, targeted more on the centre of the city. normally a lot of the strikes hop into our horizon.

we can see them on the distance, on the outskirts, may be industrial sites, critical infrastructure, maybe some of the air defence aren't stores themselves. but we saw some of these missiles come straight over the top of us here. far closer to the top of us here. far closer to the centre of town. as you say, the ukrainian authorities say that all of those 11 crews and ballistic missiles were taken out of the sky, they were destroyed. but that doesn't mean there's no damage, because when these things are destroyed there's a lot of debris, that falls from the sky, damages buildings. it can injure people if they are underneath it. they can cause fire because a lot of the missile, its flaming when it lands. so it's not something that not entirely safe, but it avoids a worse evil, if you like.— evil, if you like. james, head of ukraine's _ evil, if you like. james, head of ukraine's military _ evil, if you like. james, head of ukraine's military intelligence, | evil, if you like. james, head of| ukraine's military intelligence, it said there would be her swift and visible response. what is he hunting at? �* . ,

visible response. what is he hunting at? �* , , . . visible response. what is he hunting at? �*, , . ., �*, ., at? it's very clear, he's hinting at the coming _ at? it's very clear, he's hinting at the coming county _ at? it's very clear, he's hinting at the coming county or— at? it's very clear, he's hinting at the coming county or offensive i at? it's very clear, he's hinting at l the coming county or offensive that ukraine has been talking about. the rhetoric surrounding that is increasing. i think what we are seeing at the moment is an uptick and military activity on both sides ahead of that potential counteroffensive. you're notjust counteroffensive. you're not just seeing counteroffensive. you're notjust seeing russia increasing its air strikes here in the city, and the capital, but also on other military facilities. ukraine, in a rare admissions said that a facility on the west of the country was hit. an airfield damage, some aircraft damage, fuel set on fire. ukraine itself is increasing its attacks on targets in russian held parts of the country, commanded control areas, again, oilfacilities, things like that. and as you said in your introduction, russia is now saying that ukraine is shelling parts of russia proper on industrial sites. so i think what we've got is both sides now getting their ducks in

order, striking where they can ahead of that potential counteroffensive. we don't know when it's going to come. ukrainian officials will not say. but they all are using rhetoric suggesting that it is coming sooner rather than later.— suggesting that it is coming sooner rather than later. james landau they are in kyiv- — rather than later. james landau they are in kyiv. thanks _ rather than later. james landau they are in kyiv. thanks for _ rather than later. james landau they are in kyiv. thanks for taking - rather than later. james landau they are in kyiv. thanks for taking us - are in kyiv. thanks for taking us through all of that. now let's turn to sport. chelsea have announced that mauricio pochettino will become their new head coach. the argentine will begin his new role injuly on an initial two—year contract. pochettino returns to the premier league after previously managing tottenham hotspur for five years. he was most recently at psg. let's get more on this now with former chelsea winger pat nevin and martin lipton, chief sports reporter at the sun newspaper. thanks both of you for being here on the programme. i will start with the same question to both, because we have talked about and anticipated

coming to chelsea for quite a while. this isjust coming to chelsea for quite a while. this is just official confirmation of that. but a good appointment in your view? of that. but a good appointment in yourview? pat, of that. but a good appointment in your view? pat, first you. ialluieiiii of that. but a good appointment in your view? pat, first you.- your view? pat, first you. well you don't know _ your view? pat, first you. well you don't know it _ your view? pat, first you. well you don't know. it sounds _ your view? pat, first you. well you don't know. it sounds great - your view? pat, first you. well you i don't know. it sounds great because the background is he's got good knowledge of the game, he's played with top players and he is well—liked by players. so yeah, there's a lot to like there. as an absolute certain stack of it's going to work, absolutely not. there never is such a thing. he's got a number of things against him. chelsea fans will immediately tell them, they will immediately tell them, they will quickly forget about it as soon as he wins a few games but he knows he's got a big job. and we will find out if it is a good or bad move. i think fairly quickly, when you see the changes that he is able to make right at the start.— right at the start. martin, your thouthts right at the start. martin, your thoughts on — right at the start. martin, your thoughts on that _ right at the start. martin, your thoughts on that same - right at the start. martin, your. thoughts on that same question's right at the start. martin, your- thoughts on that same question's i think there is no question that he

has proven— think there is no question that he has proven himself as a top quality manageh — has proven himself as a top quality manager. he did a fantasticjob. in the official— manager. he did a fantasticjob. in the official announcement on the chelsea — the official announcement on the chelsea website there is no mention of the _ chelsea website there is no mention of the words taught them. it was pretended that it didn't happen, that he — pretended that it didn't happen, that he wasn't there manager. but what _ that he wasn't there manager. but what he _ that he wasn't there manager. but what he did there was acceptable. he put together a very young team and he created — put together a very young team and he created a challenging team out of a side _ he created a challenging team out of a side that— he created a challenging team out of a side that was in freefall before. it took— a side that was in freefall before. it took him — a side that was in freefall before. it took him a couple of seasons to do that it — it took him a couple of seasons to do that. it was in an instant fix but i _ do that. it was in an instant fix but i do — do that. it was in an instant fix but i do think that what we have seen _ but i do think that what we have seen from — but i do think that what we have seen from chelsea this season suggested it might not be an instant fix they— suggested it might not be an instant fix they are. there are significant issues _ fix they are. there are significant issues to— fix they are. there are significant issues to deal with, particularly about— issues to deal with, particularly about squad numbers, squad size, who to get— about squad numbers, squad size, who to get rid _ about squad numbers, squad size, who to get rid of. _ about squad numbers, squad size, who to get rid of, because they've got far too— to get rid of, because they've got far too many players. you're only about 25 — far too many players. you're only about 25 and the vast majority of the players they've got our over the a -e the players they've got our over the age of 21 _ the players they've got our over the age of 21 so— the players they've got our over the age of 21 so they have to get rid of them _ age of 21 so they have to get rid of them it's— age of 21 so they have to get rid of them it's a — age of 21 so they have to get rid of them. it's a big issue. | age of 21 so they have to get rid of them. it's a big issue.— them. it's a big issue. i was going to ask you — them. it's a big issue. i was going to ask you about _ them. it's a big issue. i was going to ask you about exactly - them. it's a big issue. i was going to ask you about exactly that. - to ask you about exactly that. that's one of the first tasks, isn't it? it's a really bloated squad that currently exist. that is going to

have to be trimmed, isn't it? they're going to have to move eight to ten— they're going to have to move eight to ten players just to meet the rules— to ten players just to meet the rules of— to ten players just to meet the rules of premier league. and they fall so— rules of premier league. and they fall so at— rules of premier league. and they fall so at the same time could've take financial fairplay into account which _ take financial fairplay into account which is _ take financial fairplay into account which is a — take financial fairplay into account which is a huge issue, because champions _ which is a huge issue, because champions league, no european football. — champions league, no european football, it's an £18 million black hole in— football, it's an £18 million black hole in their expected income stream — hole in their expected income stream. but let's be honest, we know that pochettino is very smart. he will decide — that pochettino is very smart. he will decide swiftly the players he wants _ will decide swiftly the players he wants and he will make it clear the ones he _ wants and he will make it clear the ones he doesn't want and i think that's— ones he doesn't want and i think that's an expectation that they buy-in. — that's an expectation that they buy—in, we start talking, the players — buy—in, we start talking, the players who didn't muck around him and what _ players who didn't muck around him and what he — players who didn't muck around him and what he wanted were just thin. he didn't _ and what he wanted were just thin. he didn't want them at the club any more _ he didn't want them at the club any more. and the issue is, does he have the same _ more. and the issue is, does he have the same policy to do that at chelsea _ the same policy to do that at chelsea that he had it taught them's well as— chelsea that he had it taught them's well as we _ chelsea that he had it taught them's well as we are talking we are seeing some of those people in his squad, who he keeps, who we got squared off, one of the initial questions, patch, in terms of the state of the

club, what is your assessment�*s i’iiii club, what is your assessment's i�*ll be keen to see influx. i think that's the best you can say about it. look, they have sanctions, they changed ownership, and while they changed ownership, and while they change their ownership they also change their ownership they also change their ownership they also change the upper structure of the entire club. that's the business side of it. that's also the player acquisition side of it as well. so a massive amount of change was made, they change their manager as well, it's very difficult. if you look at being successful, for quite some time, they know exactly what, they've got good players that know how to work with each other. none of those things chelsea of hard. so it's a state of flux. the trouble with that is, even you'll think there is sure, who will he keep? the attacking players, i don't know. i

don't actually think i can tell you when or who is deftly going to be there next season. let when or who is deftly going to be there next season.— there next season. let me ask a different question, _ there next season. let me ask a different question, because - there next season. let me ask a different question, because of. different question, because of course pochettino had such a frustrating time at the end that spurs in terms of spending money. he's not going to have that situation at chelsea. they have spent vast amounts on the current squad, vast amounts on the previous managers. so will make things easier, do you think�*s theyr managers. so will make things easier, do you think's they keep s-tendin easier, do you think's they keep spending money. _ easier, do you think's they keep spending money. if— easier, do you think's they keep spending money. if got - easier, do you think's they keep spending money. if got to - easier, do you think's they keep spending money. if got to sell. spending money. if got to sell before — spending money. if got to sell before they can spend. top mum didn't— before they can spend. top mum didn't spend money because of the stadium _ didn't spend money because of the stadium building. that was a specific— stadium building. that was a specific incident. the that issue there _ specific incident. the that issue there at— specific incident. the that issue there at the moment except that chelsea — there at the moment except that chelsea are set to potentially embark — chelsea are set to potentially embark on a five—year stadium rebuild — embark on a five—year stadium rebuild and playing at wimbley. i mean _ rebuild and playing at wimbley. i mean that's quite a possibility looming — mean that's quite a possibility looming on the horizon. but in the short— looming on the horizon. but in the short term. — looming on the horizon. but in the short term, they cannot spend money without— short term, they cannot spend money without selling. they are hugely exposed — without selling. they are hugely exposed to financial fairplay. and sellin t exposed to financial fairplay. and sellint it exposed to financial fairplay. and selling it is _

exposed to financial fairplay. jifyc selling it is almost exposed to financial fairplay. fific selling it is almost assumed exposed to financial fairplay. e"ic selling it is almost assumed in exposed to financial fairplay. el"ic selling it is almost assumed in the equation here. i've only got about a minute and a bit less, so a quick final thought for both of you. someone was talking about this earlier the other day, saying when you step away from winning premier league titles, when in cups, it can take you an awful long time to actually get back. you look at chelsea in the past, liverpool, manchester united, you couldn't lose things for a generation, potentially, can you? things for a generation, totentiall , can ou? ., potentially, can you? you can lose it for a generation, _ potentially, can you? you can lose it for a generation, but _ potentially, can you? you can lose it for a generation, but have - potentially, can you? you can lose it for a generation, but have a - potentially, can you? you can lose| it for a generation, but have a look at the age group that they have brought in. they are all 20, 21, 22. they might not be a very good team next year. two or three years down the line, they've got a very good chance. n. �* . the line, they've got a very good chance- i _ the line, they've got a very good chance.- i think - the line, they've got a very good chance.- i think there . the line, they've got a very good chance.- i think there is| chance. martin's i think there is a ve tood chance. martin's i think there is a very good chance _ chance. martin's i think there is a very good chance that _ chance. martin's i think there is a very good chance that some - chance. martin's i think there is a very good chance that some of i chance. martin's i think there is a . very good chance that some of these players _ very good chance that some of these players are _ very good chance that some of these players are going to be big players. but there is, there has been a massive — but there is, there has been a massive gamble on them being those players _ massive gamble on them being those players and we will find out. it could well be that like in the previous—

could well be that like in the previousjobs he will could well be that like in the previous jobs he will be able to form _ previous jobs he will be able to form a — previous jobs he will be able to form a squad, a unit, a core identity— form a squad, a unit, a core identity of— form a squad, a unit, a core identity of the team that will last for four— identity of the team that will last for four or— identity of the team that will last for four or five seasons, maybe more — for four or five seasons, maybe more if— for four or five seasons, maybe more if he _ for four or five seasons, maybe more. if he does that, then chelsea will return— more. if he does that, then chelsea will return pretty quickly. if you count. — will return pretty quickly. if you count. it — will return pretty quickly. if you count, it will be tough. we will return pretty quickly. if you count, it will be tough. we have to leave it there. it _ count, it will be tough. we have to leave it there. it can't _ count, it will be tough. we have to leave it there. it can't be - count, it will be tough. we have to leave it there. it can't be worse . leave it there. it can't be worse than this season, mid table, that's where chelsea ended up. thank so much to both of you. better to talk to you on that significant story. back with more headlines here and just a moment. pretty much right up across the board. you can see the strong area of high pressure really dominating the scene across the uk, ireland,

and the northwest of the continent as well. we have had some cloud across eastern england but that will tend to break up through the course of the afternoon and we should see good sunny spells around, some cloud draped across the far north of scotland but most places seeing blue skies overhead, plenty of sunshine, and highs of around 21, maybe 22 degrees, but cooler along the coast and particularly in the southeast we have a fairly strong northeasterly breeze. now through this evening and overnight it looks like some of that cloud across the north sea will roll westward against the midlands, southern england, could see a little bit towards wales as well but we have clear skies and quite chilly temperatures down close to freezing but generally for most between four and 7 degrees. tomorrow then we start off rather gray across eastern areas, it's going to take time for that cloud to break up, and we will hold onto fairly brisk northeasterly breeze, cooler along the coast, warmer south and west, could be up to the mid—20s they are across the

central belt of scotland. wednesday, or similar story, central belt of scotland. wednesday, orsimilarstory, best central belt of scotland. wednesday, or similar story, best of sunshine in scotland and northern ireland. it could turn sunny across the far southeast. again, cooler along the north sea coast, particularly towards coastal parts of the southeast, warmest weather towards the north and the west, could be up to 26 degrees for the glascow area. thursday, a bit more cloud in northern and eastern scotland and england, getting that breeze through the channel, but i think further west is where we will see the best of the sunshine, temperatures in northwest new england, south, in southwest england. for friday and the weekend, very little change, high pressure continues to dominate, although a different story as we look toward southern europe through the mediterranean from spain across greece and turkey. it will be a mixture of sunshine and heavy thundering showers but for our shores, barely a drop of rain in sight. it's going to stay fine and settled with plenty of sunshine.

has still seen violence. this is bbc news, the headlines. the uk's top daytime tv show, this morning, faces an uncertain future after multiple reports of its "toxic" workplace culture.

despite a week—long ceasefire declared across sudan, the country's western darfur region