know why you guys put a queue in that, i want an american spelling bee, not english. it spelling bee, not english. it shows. spelling bee, not english. it shows- i _ spelling bee, not english. it shows. i commend - spelling bee, not english. it shows. i commend you - spelling bee, not english. it shows. i commend you for. spelling bee, not english. it - shows. i commend you for living with these _ shows. i commend you for living with these spellings _ shows. i commend you for living with these spellings every - shows. i commend you for living with these spellings every day. i with these spellings every day. good _ with these spellings every day. good to — with these spellings every day. good to have _ with these spellings every day. good to have us. _ with these spellings every day. good to have us. we _ with these spellings every day. good to have us. we start - with these spellings every day. good to have us. we start withi good to have us. we start with an unfolding tragedy in india. new figures coming in and the afp newsagency is reporting at least 280 people have died and 900 more have been injured in a multi— train collision. officials said several coaches came off the track and fell on the opposite rails in the eastern state of odisha open. they are also wanting the casualty figures are expected to continue rising. it was supposed to be an overnight train journey but ended up as a

disaster in the middle of the countryside. carriages were toppled, due to the powerful impact. smashing open the compartments. rescue teams and residents climbed up the mountain of wreckage to find survivors. distraught relatives were praying for the safe recovery of their loved ones. translation: 10—15 people fell on me, when the accident happened and everything was haywire. i hurt my hand and also the back of my neck. emergency teams are working through the night to try to rescue those trapped inside the carriages. the government has dispatched more than 60 ambulances to take the injured to various hospitals. it's not immediately clear what led to the derailment and subsequent collision. india has one of the largest train networks in the world and accidents are common, despite successive governments investing hundreds of millions of pounds to improve the infrastructure.

that is of course a developing story there in india, we will be bringing you updates on that story the debt ceiling safer come free from economic collapse was not with the debt ceiling had been a standard by monday because you would have defaulted on is $31 trillion debt which the us treasury secretary said would have been catastrophic. instead, biden praised congress for reaching a bipartisan agreement. the president also said he will sign the bill into law on saturday. sign the bill into law on saturday-— sign the bill into law on saturda . . , , , , saturday. passing this budget agreement — saturday. passing this budget agreement was _ saturday. passing this budget agreement was critical. - saturday. passing this budget agreement was critical. the i agreement was critical. the states could not have been higher. —— stakes was not if we fail to reach an agreement on the budget, there were extreme voices threatening to take america for the first time in our 2117 year history into default on our national debt. nothing, nothing would have been more irresponsible. i want to commend speaker mccarthy. he

and i and our teams, to commend speaker mccarthy. he and i and ourteams, we to commend speaker mccarthy. he and i and our teams, we were able to get along and get things done in a straightforward way and completely honest with one another, respectfulwith completely honest with one another, respectful with one another. both sides operated in good faith. both sides kept their word.— their word. that was a president _ their word. that was a president speaking - their word. that was a president speaking a l their word. that was a - president speaking a little bit earlier on friday evening and with me isjust parker, our north america corresponded following is a story. happy with us. this was prime—time speech to talk about this debt ceiling agreement which the president is going to sign as he says on saturday.- president is going to sign as he says on saturday. what was this all about? _ he says on saturday. what was this all about? i _ he says on saturday. what was this all about? i think- he says on saturday. what was this all about? i think this - this all about? i think this was probably partlyjoe biden�*s chances as he sees it to give his assessment on what on earth has happened over the last few weeks because at times of course it has been pretty chaotic in these warnings, as you were saying, that the us could default on its debt. on monday all the economic consequences that that would unleash on the country and the deal has been criticised by both sides so i thinkjoe biden, partly using this

address, to explain the process as he sees it, reaching this deal with senior republicans and outlining as well what he feels is the very real dangers of default and i think trying to punch through may be that sense that oh, they are always going to do this. he wanted to say, i managed to score a win and i prevented this catastrophe from happening so trying i think to get a bit of that political narrative and success as well.— success as well. you are following _ success as well. you are following the _ success as well. you are following the flurry - success as well. you are following the flurry of i success as well. you are l following the flurry of this activity around the debt ceiling all week with the voting congress as well. does this mean now that the crisis is averted, all is well? i don't know if all is well exactly. he is going to sign it on saturday, as you say, two days before the us was due to default. this was a pretty close—run thing and it caused a huge amount of uncertainty. us treasury secretary janet yellen �*s talked treasury secretary janet yellen �*stalked before about how

borrowing costs were already going up and actually the credit ratings agency has said it is keeping the us's credit rating or negative. there is an idea that this type of brinkmanship, the idea that the us could default even though politically in the end it is unlikely, that damages confidence in the us economy so it is all very well, republican house speaker kevin mccarthy or the presidentjoe biden saying, look at this great deal we have managed to broker and avert catastrophe. with the possibility of the catastrophe itself has already caused damage. itself has already caused damage-— itself has already caused damage. itself has already caused damaae.~ . damage. what about the message from the president _ damage. what about the message from the president about - from the president about bipartisanship? edie was trying to make a contrast between his message and what we saw from some republicans? —— do you think he was. some republicans? -- do you think he was.— think he was. there was a lot in this address _ think he was. there was a lot in this address that _ think he was. there was a lot in this address that went - think he was. there was a lot j in this address that went well beyond the debt ceiling. it talked about his policy achievements as he sees them so far. other things he would like to do in the future. clearly we would like to see this through the —— he would like to see

this through the prism of him getting elected to the white house again. and he talked about he believes and has always believed it is very important to be able to reach across the aisle and work with your political opponents and i think you're right, that effort to emphasise consensus, consensusbuilding, i think he is trying to paint himself as this calm steward of the us economy and put himself and puts a clear blue water between him and the likes of donald trump and hint at those stylistic differences. let's talk about _ stylistic differences. let's talk about that. _ stylistic differences. let's talk about that. how - stylistic differences. let's| talk about that. how does stylistic differences. let's - talk about that. how does this all planes of the 2024 campaign for republicans? it is all planes of the 2024 campaign for republicans?— for republicans? it is a little bit complicated _ for republicans? it is a little bit complicated because - for republicans? it is a little bit complicated because thisj bit complicated because this deal is very much been owned by kevin mccarthy, the republican house speaker, who as far as we are aware is not going to be running to be president of the united states for the republican party. the two people the most prominent names in that race at the moment, ronald trump and ron desantis, haven't exactly been complimentary of the situation donald trump said if you don't

get massive spending cuts then maybe we should default and ron desantis criticised the deal doesn't look like these two men will be owning this.— will be owning this. thank you for analysis. _ will be owning this. thank you for analysis. the _ will be owning this. thank you for analysis. the us _ will be owning this. thank you for analysis. the us defence l for analysis. the us defence secretary lloyd austin has addressed asia's biggest annual security summit in a speech focused on tensions between china and the us. it comes as a relationship between the two countries is at its lowest point in decades. ageing refused an offerfor point in decades. ageing refused an offer for direct talks in singapore between general austin and his chinese counterpart on the sidelines of the summit and lloyd austin said the region security could not be considered a foregone conclusion.— conclusion. these short principles _ conclusion. these short principles matter - conclusion. these short principles matter for i conclusion. these short l principles matter for men conclusion. these short - principles matter for men women and children all around this region. and they cannot be taken for granted. and neither can this region's security or

prosperity be taken for granted. prosperity be taken for granted-— prosperity be taken for ranted. �* , ., granted. and here is what the australian _ granted. and here is what the australian prime _ granted. and here is what the australian prime minister- granted. and here is what the australian prime minister hadj australian prime minister had to say. australian prime minister had to sa . �* , ., ., australian prime minister had tosa. , ., .,, to say. australia strongly supports _ to say. australia strongly supports a _ to say. australia strongly supports a renewed - to say. australia strongly| supports a renewed effort to say. australia strongly - supports a renewed effort from president biden's administration to establish reliable and open channels of communication between the governments of the united states of america and the people's republic of china. the consequences of such a breakdown, whether in the taiwan strait or elsewhere, would not be confined to the big powers or the side of the conflict, they would be devastating for the world. let's go live to the bbc�*s monica miller who was following this summit for us in singapore. great to have you with us again. what message do you think the us defence secretary was trying to send with his speech? he secretary was trying to send with his speech?— secretary was trying to send with his speech? he was trying to send the _ with his speech? he was trying to send the message _ with his speech? he was trying to send the message that - with his speech? he was trying to send the message that he . with his speech? he was trying to send the message that he is with his allies in the indo pacific and that is a wide net that stretches north of japan all the way down to ——

australia. these are partnerships the us is really relying heavily on as tensions continue to get worse between the us and china.— the us and china. bei'ing has refused, the us and china. bei'ing has refused. as h the us and china. bei'ing has refused, as we h the us and china. beijing has refused, as we heard, - the us and china. beijing has refused, as we heard, direct| refused, as we heard, direct talks between general austin and his chinese counterpart. what impact has that had on the summit? it what impact has that had on the summit? . ., , ., , summit? it certainly got things off on a frosty _ summit? it certainly got things off on a frosty note. _ summit? it certainly got things off on a frosty note. on - summit? it certainly got things | off on a frosty note. on monday we heard that general leash kung fu was not going to meet on the sidelines with us secretary of defence lloyd austin and i was really something that people were hoping to see. last year the two of them met in public and this year they hope —— this year —— in the hope was that they was —— the hope was they were going to meet again but that was a declined offer. one of the things the chinese has said the reason was was because they don't really feel that the americans are being particularly sincere in all of this and that they must correct its mistaken actions. you need to remember that during the

presidency of donald trump, he pulled out of this region and a lot of those dialogues take place these diplomatic dialogues went dormant. when presidentjoe biden came back into power, that was really one of his top priorities, to rebuild the relationships in this part of the world. and china really swept in in that vacuum and had a leadership role. so the tensions certainly are fierce and that is one thing that these two sides are jockeying for with all these members here, more than 49 countries are represented in the military forces. find the military forces. and monica. _ the military forces. and monica, do _ the military forces. and monica, do you - the military forces. and monica, do you get - the military forces. and monica, do you get the| the military forces. and monica, do you get the sense, especially a sec. austin, as you said, was speaking to us allies in the region, that there is unity on how to engage with china? it there is unity on how to engage with china?— with china? it was interesting because while _ with china? it was interesting because while he _ with china? it was interesting because while he did - with china? it was interesting because while he did talk - with china? it was interesting i because while he did talk about taiwan which was really that flashpoint between the two countries, he also said that conflict there isn't immediate,

imminent, but rather than if thatisitis imminent, but rather than if that is it is going to have a devastating effect for the world and it is interesting to hear from the prime world and it is interesting to hearfrom the prime minister of australia yesterday. one thing an analyst here we spoke to had pointed out that many countries that are caught in between, they don't really want to take sides. australia has been a staunch ally of the us for quite some time but if you're caught in the middle of the south china sea, you really are dependent on kind of both of these countries, particularly when it comes to trade and she compared it to saying, between the devil and the deep blue sea. it is a very tricky balance for many countries here and the us has put on this calm offence and will probably see tomorrow china making its point in response to the speech that we heard from secretary austin. rick last question, what outcomes are you expecting to see? —— quick last question. element probably not much. i don't think we will see a big speech or a big change in opinion but what we could see is that they might be laying

the groundwork behind closed doors. , g ., doors. tween -- between joe biden and _ doors. tween -- between joe biden and president - doors. tween -- between joe biden and president xi - doors. tween -- between joe| biden and president xi jinping later this year.— later this year. monica miller, thank you _ later this year. monica miller, thank you for— later this year. monica miller, thank you for your _ later this year. monica miller, thank you for your analysis. . thank you for your analysis. turning to the war in ukraine and president zelensky has threatened possible prosecutions of officials if there was any repeat of the failure to open bomb shelters that contributed to the deaths of three people in kyiv on tuesday. a nine—year—old girl, her mother and another woman died after trying to use a shelter during a russia missile strike only to find it was closed. mr zelensky said shelter should be accessible 24 hours a day. this was a scene in the substation as fresh russian airstrikes happened overnight. 36 drones and missiles were shot down in and around the capital. our correspondent james watt has has more. there seems to be quite a bit of ugly political fallout from yesterday's strikes which left three people

dead. they were unable to get into an air raid shelter which was locked. it was a public aerated shelter and today president zelensky has hardly held back. he has described the city's mayor as an enemy and said he thought it was russia but it seems that we have internal enemies as well. he has responded in short saying yes he is partly responsible but it was the president who installed the officials who were responsible for that shelter. it really is ugly but i think this has been a relentless continuation of russian airstrikes. there were two waves of attacks last night. yet another night and morning where people heard sirens and then explosions, they weren't able to get a nice sleep and had to head to take cover. the skies were filled with air defence systems where missiles were going up into the

air, lighting the area in orange at times. it was almost like a bizarre fireworks display and this is the daily reality and there are no signs to suggest that russia is going to suggest that russia is going to let up with its tactic of targeting ukrainian cities despite the military significance of such a move continuing to be debatable. james waterhouse there. two weeks after stepping down from his itv show and a week after revealing he had a relationship with a much younger male colleague philip schofield has apologised for what he called a grave error. he said his career was not over and he'd lost everything. in his first broadcast interview since he quit itv, he said the relationship only began several years after his first meeting with the young man, who was then 15. he strongly denies grooming him but says he regrets the relationship and lying about it when itv tried to investigate. he also said he

believed homophobia had fuelled the media coverage of events. he has been talking to the bbc. you have had quite the week. how are you? i you have had quite the week. how are you?— how are you? i think... i understand _ how are you? i think... i understand how - how are you? i think... i understand how caroline j how are you? i think... i - understand how caroline flint felt. —— flack. last week, if my... daughters hadn't been there, then... iwouldn't my... daughters hadn't been there, then... i wouldn't be here. and they've guarded me. it's like a weird numbness.

you've don't have to do this interview. i you've don't have to do this interview-— you've don't have to do this interview._ why | you've don't have to do this i interview._ why do interview. i have two. why do ou interview. i have two. why do you want _ interview. i have two. why do you want to — interview. i have two. why do you want to do _ interview. i have two. why do you want to do this _ interview. i have two. why do | you want to do this interview? because there is an innocent person here who did not do anything wrong. ijust have to say stop with him. ok with me. but stop with him. leave him alone now. but stop with him. leave him alone now-— but stop with him. leave him alone now. 0k. where did you first make _ alone now. 0k. where did you first make this _ alone now. 0k. where did you first make this young - alone now. 0k. where did you first make this young man - alone now. 0k. where did you first make this young man in l first make this young man in question? what were the circumstances? i question? what were the circumstances?— question? what were the circumstances? ., , _ circumstances? i was invited by a friend of— circumstances? i was invited by a friend of mine _ circumstances? i was invited by a friend of mine to _ circumstances? i was invited by a friend of mine to go _ circumstances? i was invited by a friend of mine to go to - circumstances? i was invited by a friend of mine to go to open l a friend of mine to go to open a friend of mine to go to open a drama school. whether it was immediately or sometime after, he said, "will you follow him on twitter because he is a fan?" and i said sure. and he was 15 at _ fan?" and i said sure. and he was 15 at the _ fan?" and i said sure. and he was 15 at the time? _ fan?" and i said sure. and he was 15 at the time? but - fan?" and i said sure. and he was 15 at the time? but | - was 15 at the time? but i follow 11,300 _ was 15 at the time? but i follow 11,300 people - was 15 at the time? but i follow 11,300 people and was 15 at the time? but | l follow 11,300 people and in was 15 at the time? but i - follow 11,300 people and in all the time i have been on twitter, there has never been any with of impropriety. find any with of impropriety. and how often — any with of impropriety. and how often will _ any with of impropriety. and how often will you _ any with of impropriety. and how often will you in - any with of impropriety. and how often will you in touch with him?—

how often will you in touch with him? ., , ., , with him? hardly ever, hardly at all, with him? hardly ever, hardly at all. and — with him? hardly ever, hardly at all, and that _ with him? hardly ever, hardly at all, and that was _ with him? hardly ever, hardly at all, and that was it - with him? hardly ever, hardly at all, and that was it for - with him? hardly ever, hardly at all, and that was it for a i at all, and that was it for a while. and then, he asked if he could visit the studios, work experience type of thing. and i said come down and have a look, for sure. which he did. haifa for sure. which he did. how lona for sure. which he did. how long was — for sure. which he did. how long was he _ for sure. which he did. how long was he when _ for sure. which he did. how long was he when he i for sure. which he did. how long was he when he first . for sure. which he did. how long was he when he first said to you i'm interested in television.— to you i'm interested in television. . ., television. 19. to be clear, how what _ television. 19. to be clear, how what was _ television. 19. to be clear, how what was this - television. 19. to be clear, how what was this young l television. 19. to be clear, i how what was this young man when you first have any kind of sexual contact with him? 20. let me ask you directly, do you have any kind of sexual relationship or sex with him when he was under age? no. god no. i think that is, in my statement, it says, you know, consensual relationship, fully legal, it was approved by both sides. he had been working at the show for a few months. and we become mates. we were mates. and then, in my dressing room

one day... something happened. which, you know, obviously, i will... regret forever, for him and for me, mostly him. but it... that happened maybe four or five times over the next few months. and i know it's... unforgivable. but we won't boyfriends. we were not in a relationship ——we weren't. i was really in a mess with my own sexuality at the time. and it just own sexuality at the time. and itjust happened.— itjust happened. how old was he at this _ itjust happened. how old was he at this stage? _ itjust happened. how old was he at this stage? 20, - itjust happened. how old was he at this stage? 20, 21. - itjust happened. how old was he at this stage? 20, 21. who| he at this stage? 20, 21. who knew on the _ he at this stage? 20, 21. who knew on the team? _ he at this stage? 20, 21. who

knew on the team? nobody. l he at this stage? 20, 21. who | knew on the team? nobody. to he at this stage? 20, 21. who - knew on the team? nobody. to my knowledge- — knew on the team? nobody. to my knowledge. and _ knew on the team? nobody. to my knowledge. and did _ knew on the team? nobody. to my knowledge. and did you _ knew on the team? nobody. to my knowledge. and did you ever i knowledge. and did you ever tell holly willoughby? i knowledge. and did you ever tell holly willoughby? god . knowledge. and did you ever i tell holly willoughby? god no. holl did tell holly willoughby? god no. holly did not — tell holly willoughby? god no. holly did not know. _ tell holly willoughby? god no. holly did not know. nobody i holly did not know. nobody knew. ., ,., , holly did not know. nobody knew. ., , ., , knew. the reason these matters is because _ knew. the reason these matters is because it _ knew. the reason these matters is because it is _ knew. the reason these matters is because it is about _ is because it is about potential abuse of power. i understand that, and that is a very, very valid question to put to me. and i think if it was mal— female then it wouldn't be such a scandal. there is an enormous amount of homophobia and we like to think that we've moved forward in 2023 -- that we've moved forward in 2023 —— male—female. this that we've moved forward in 2023 -- male-female. this is the tip of _ 2023 -- male-female. this is the tip of the _ 2023 -- male-female. this is the tip of the iceberg. - 2023 -- male-female. this is the tip of the iceberg. other. the tip of the iceberg. other more revelations to come or as far as you're concerned... that's my biggest, sorriest secret. . , that's my biggest, sorriest secret. ., , ., ., secret. finally, what would you like to say _ secret. finally, what would you like to say to — secret. finally, what would you like to say to the _ secret. finally, what would you like to say to the young - secret. finally, what would you like to say to the young man i secret. finally, what would you like to say to the young man in | like to say to the young man in question? to like to say to the young man in question?— like to say to the young man in cuestion? ., ., .,, question? to him, i am the most sor . question? to him, i am the most sorry- by — question? to him, i am the most sorry- by getting _ question? to him, i am the most sorry. by getting involved - sorry. by getting involved with me, i have caused you so much pain. i will never forgive myself. i made a bad judgement

call. myself. i made a bad 'udgement call. . myself. i made a bad 'udgement call. , ., ., ,, call. philip schofield, thank ou so call. philip schofield, thank you so much _ call. philip schofield, thank you so much for— call. philip schofield, thank you so much for your i call. philip schofield, thank you so much for your time. | you so much for your time. thanks. researchers from oxford university in the uk say a new blood test has shown promising results in detecting 50 types of cancer. test was particularly effective at spotting the origins the cancers, though it's not yet accurate enough for public usage. fergus walsh has more. scientists believe we are edging ever closer to a blood test which can reliably detect and rule out cancer. this one developed by a californian company. so how does it work? the test looks for fragments of cancer dna which have broken off from the tumour and are circulating in the bloodstream. in the biggest trial of its kind a team at oxford university monitored over 5000 people who went to their gp in england

and wales with cancer symptoms. a blood test correctly identified two out of three cancer cases. now, ehat that means for patients is that 75% of those with a positive blood test did have cancer which was confirmed by conventional methods like scans. but 2.5% who had a negative test also had cancer, which is why researchers described it as a work in progress, not accurate enough to be used in daily practice. what's exciting researchers is where cancer was identified, in 85% of cases, the blood test was able to pinpoint the original site of the cancer. this is crucial as often, people go to their doctor with only vague symptoms like weight loss and abdominal pain. a major trial called nhs—galleri is under way with 140,000 healthy volunteers to see if the blood test can detect early signs of cancer. the first results are due next

year and if successful, the nhs in england plans to extend the rollout to a further one million people. fergus walsh, bbc news. you may have heard there is a new national spelling bee champion here in the us. he hi l e semberfile. david shor from florida won the 2023 scripts national spelling bee and the 50,000 prize that goes with it, spelling summerfile correctly, it won him the final round and the title —— dev shah. it got a lot of us talking about why some words are spelt differently in american english than in british english. some of our colleagues put this to some of the exhibits spelling bee. we will give you words but you have to spell them in british english instead of american english. english instead of american en . lish. english instead of american enalish. �* . english instead of american enalish. �* , english. the british way? ok. but english. the british way? 0k. itut going _ english. the british way? 0k. itut going to _ english. the british way? ok. but going to be _ english. the british way? ok. but going to be tricky. - english. the british way? ok. but going to be tricky. your. but going to be tricky. your word is colour. _

but going to be tricky. your word is colour. colour. i but going to be tricky. your. word is colour. colour. colour. i can word is colour. colour. colour. i can do _ word is colour. colour. colour. i can do this. _ word is colour. colour. colour. i can do this. c— word is colour. colour. colour. i can do this. c 0 _ word is colour. colour. colour. i can do this. co l— word is colour. colour. colour. ican dothis. co l0- word is colour. colour. colour. ican dothis. c0 loyou- word is colour. colour. colour. i can do this. c 0 l 0 you are. | i can do this. c 0 l 0 you are. level two- — i can do this. c 0 l 0 you are. level two. the _ i can do this. c 0 l 0 you are. level two. the word - i can do this. c 0 l 0 you are. level two. the word defence. | level two. the word defence. defence. ~ . , . level two. the word defence. defence-_ level two. the word defence. defence. ~ ., , , ., . defence. what type of defence is this? def— defence. what type of defence is this? def en _ defence. what type of defence is this? def en ce. _ defence. what type of defence is this? def en ce. level- is this? def en ce. level three. check. _ is this? def en ce. level three. check. cag i is this? def en ce. level three. check. cag ck - is this? def en ce. level. three. check. cag ck check. cag. .. three. check. cag ck check. cag- -- kill _ three. check. cag ck check. cag... kill you _ three. check. cag ck check. cag... kill you either. i three. check. cag ck check. cag... kill you either. for. cag... kill you either. for some_ cag... kill you either. for some reason. i don't know why you some reason. idon't know why you guys— some reason. i don't know why you guys put a queue in that but 0k~ _ you guys put a queue in that but 0k. , ., but 0k. next level is the word tire. the british _ but 0k. next level is the word tire. the british way _ but 0k. next level is the word tire. the british way to - but 0k. next level is the word tire. the british way to spell l tire. the british way to spell this? i tire. the british way to spell this? i did — tire. the british way to spell this? i did not _ tire. the british way to spell this? i did not know- tire. the british way to spell this? i did not know you i tire. the british way to spell| this? i did not know you guys sell this? i did not know you guys spell this _ this? i did not know you guys spell this differently. - this? i did not know you guys spell this differently. ty i this? i did not know you guys spell this differently. ty re? | spell this differently. ty re? ty re — spell this differently. ty re? ty re tire _ spell this differently. ty re? ty re- tire-— ty re. tire. the final round. manoeuvre. _ ty re. tire. the final round. manoeuvre. i— ty re. tire. the final round. i manoeuvre. i do not know how to do this but _ manoeuvre. i do not know how to do this but let _ manoeuvre. i do not know how to do this but let me _ manoeuvre. i do not know how to

do this but let me think. - manoeuvre. i do not know how to do this but let me think. ma i do this but let me think. ma in... do this but let me think. ma in- -- eu _ do this but let me think. ma in... eu vre? _ do this but let me think. ma in... eu vre? o _ do this but let me think. ma in... eu vre? o evr- do this but let me think. ma in... eu vre? o evr e? - do this but let me think. ma in... eu vre? 0 evr e? i've heard in... eu vre? o evr e? i've heard that — in... eu vre? 0 evr e? i've heard that before. _ in... eu vre? 0 evr e? i've heard that before. of i in... eu vre? 0 evr e? i'vej heard that before. of course in... eu vre? 0 evr e? i've. heard that before. of course it is not — heard that before. of course it is not like _ heard that before. of course it is not like that. _ heard that before. of course it is not like that.— is not like that. you got it! hello, bbc- _ is not like that. you got it! hello, bbc. fix _ is not like that. you got it! hello, bbc. fix your- is not like that. you got it! i hello, bbc. fix your spelling. what are _ hello, bbc. fix your spelling. what are you _ hello, bbc. fix your spelling. what are you doing? - hello, bbc. fix your spelling. what are you doing? maybe l hello, bbc. fix your spelling. i what are you doing? maybe spell thins what are you doing? maybe spell thin . s the what are you doing? maybe spell things the american _ what are you doing? maybe spell things the american way - things the american way for once? — things the american way for once? ., , , once? kind of unique spelling. i was in once? kind of unique spelling. i was in the — once? kind of unique spelling. i was in the american - once? kind of unique spelling. i was in the american spelling | i was in the american spelling bee, _ i was in the american spelling bee. nol— i was in the american spelling bee, not english. it i was in the american spelling bee, not english.— bee, not english. it shows. i commend — bee, not english. it shows. i commend you _ bee, not english. it shows. i commend you for— bee, not english. it shows. i commend you for living i bee, not english. it shows. i commend you for living with | commend you for living with these — commend you for living with these spellings— commend you for living with these spellings every- commend you for living with these spellings every day. l thanks to those competitors for playing along with the bbc. before we go, there have been a lot of headlines and hype around the new barbie movie but here's something you may have missed. it is, of course, known for her love of bright pink. the director to go we told architectural digests that by wanting to get barbie's well just right, construction for the movie caused a global shortage of the fluorescent shade of roscoe paint. she said that for a moment, the world

ran out of pink. that's our show at this hour. thank you for watching. stay with us. hello there. no shortage of sunshine in the weekend forecast for most of us. one thing, though, we will continue to see a shortage of is rain. there are many places, particularly in the south and west of the uk, that have not seen any measurable rainfall for more than three weeks and that is not going to change very much over the next few days. in fact, over the next five days, while southern parts of europe will continue to be very wet indeed, across our shores, very little — if any — rain in the forecast and that is because high pressure continues to hold firm to the north—west of europe, allowing these thunderstorms to pop up down towards the south but keeping us largely dry, fine and settled with some spells of sunshine.

and that sun is strong at this time of year with high uv levels. most of us starting on a sunny note on saturday. across of england and wales, tending to retreat back towards the east coast. we will keep a bit more cloud around northern scotland, particularly for orkney and shetland. and there is just a very, very small chance for a shower over higher ground in scotland and northern ireland, but really only a small chance. a slightly warmer day — 16 or 17 along the east coast, 23 for some spots further west. and the fa cup final taking place at wembley — the weather is set fair with quite a lot of sunshine through the afternoon. and at hampden park for the scottish cup final, very similarforecast — spells of sunshine, temperatures of and 21 or 22 degrees. now, as we head through saturday evening, it is going to stay fine with lots of sunshine and then, clear skies overnight. that will mean another rather chilly light but we will see

some low cloud rolling in across in the north—east of scotland and maybe some patches of low cloud across eastern parts of england as well. temperatures generally 7—10 degrees but it may be a little chillier in some spots in the countryside. and then into sunday, well, a bit more in the way of low cloud for parts of northern and eastern scotland, threatening to roll onto the east coast of england. further west, spells of sunshine and temperatures again up to 22 or 23 degrees. and then, as we look ahead to the coming week — well, little, ifany, rain in the forecast. it's going to stay dry and, if anything, it's set to turn a bit warmer later in the week.

voice-over: this is bbc news. we'll have the headlines and all the main news stories for you at the top of the hour, straight after this programme. a myanmar military jet a myanmar militaryjet cycle is a primary school. —— circles. after seizing power in a coup they are trying to crush an uprising, demanding democracy. when they think it safe, they

run.