our north america correspondent nomia iqbal explained the nature of the idictment. these charges are huge. these are federal charges that donald trump is facing, so this is his second indictment and of course he doesn't have the drama of the first indictment in new york, but in legal terms this is way bigger. this is essentially the united states of america saying to its former commander—in—chief that you need to be put on trial for allegedly jeopardising the country's national security, so this is a big, and those pictures show that he allegedly had hundreds of classified documents stored in boxes on a stage, in a ballroom, lots of people would be able to see it. also stacked in boxes in the bathroom, near the shower. and interestingly in that speech which he used to air his grievances that he mentioned president biden, so it is worth reminding people that president biden is also being investigated over his mishandling of classified documents,

but it is very different in the sense that president biden, it is thought to be about ten documents that he had done this was during his time as vice president and as a senator, some were found at his home in wilmington in delaware and others at the headquarters of a former think tank he was a part of. but he cooperated with the department ofjustice in order to get those documents back, the same thing happened with former vice president mike pence who is not going to be charged by the department ofjustice so it is very different, but it has not stopped trump of accusing president biden of weaponising the department ofjustice to go after him which president biden has completely dismissed. as you mention, he did say republicans are treated differently to democrats by the justice department. a lot of messages that came out in his speech, but of course one of the questions

that experts have tried to answer is whether or not he could face prison time if found guilty, if convicted. what could happen next? just lay out the potential timeline for us. on tuesday donald trump will appear in the courthouse behind me and as you can imagine there are lots of media here already, marking off their territory, where they want to broadcast from, and this will become even bigger on tuesday. as i mentioned, different to the new york case, and he will be fingerprinted but there won't be handcuffs or a mugshot. he will go inside the court and face a judge and lay out the charges and he is expected to plead not guilty in the special prosecutor jack smith has said he wants this to be a speedy trial. something worth remembering is the department ofjustice has a decades long policy that it does not indict sitting presidents and we are heading towards election season so they want this wrapped up

as quickly as possible. jack smith has also investigated donald trump over his role in the january the 6th capital rights. something else people might be asking, prosecutors want him to face a jury in the place where these alleged crimes happened. the courthouse is about two hours away from mar—a—lago which is his florida home. also florida is a republican leaning states which he won twice in the last two presidential elections and thejudge initially handling the case is one he appointed, so it will be pretty hard for donald trump to argue he is not getting a fair hearing but i'm pretty sure he will not look at it in that way. manchester city have won the champions league for the first time in their history. the 1—0 win against inter milan secures the domestic and european treble for the club — only the second time an english club has achieved the feat, the first being their rivals,

manchester united. live now to istanbul and our sports correspondent olly foster. what a moment for city fans. a very, very special— what a moment for city fans. a very, very special evening _ what a moment for city fans. a very, very special evening for _ what a moment for city fans. a very, very special evening for manchester. very special evening for manchester city's players, their staff, pep guardiola and the 20,000 plus fans inside the stadium. it was also a nerve shredding evening, not the prettiest champions league final. manchester city were not at their fluent best but you can partly put that down to how well inter milan played. they suffocated the premier league champions who they knew were chasing something very special. everybody in the stadium knew that manchester city were the favourites to complete that rarity of the treble, winning the league and the main cup competition in their

country and becoming european champions as well. manchester city had swept all before them this season, catching arsenal up in the premier league, reeling them in over a number of months to seal the premier league, they are third in a row, fifth in the six years under pep guardiola, and then the fa cup the following weekend after the final weekend of the premier league, beating manchester united. now they emulate manchester united, who completed the treble back in 1999. it is now istanbul 2023 that will go down in manchester city history. i am looking at my pictures as they manchester city players go on to the rostrum in the centre of the pitch inside the stadium. the uefa president hasjust put inside the stadium. the uefa president has just put a winners medal around erling haaland's neck, he didn't score tonight but he has

scored 52 times this season. they are hero this evening was the spanish midfielder rhodri, midway through the second half, the one real bit of creativity, bernardo silva created it and a deflected ball came into his pathjust inside the box and he threaded what proved to be the winnerjust inside the post to the side of the inter milan goalkeeper who could do nothing about it. but my word, inter milan had chances to equalise and score more after city had got the opener. they hit the bar, romelu lukaku came off the bench with a point—blank header saved by ederson and then the final few minutes saving again. ilkay gundogan has the champions league trophy in his hands and you should be able to see the fireworks shortly as he lifts the trophy

aloft. i can hear the champions league anthem being played as all those city players are absolutely jubilant at securing their first champions league trophy. 15 years after that megarich abu dhabi takeover and they go the fireworks, signifying that we have a winner in this season's champions league. 15 years this has been a project. pep guardiola has always played down whether or not this was significant in the club's history but this season he said it would be a definitive step towards them being considered a truly great club. domestically they have been dominant and swept all before them and now they have gone all the way in the champions league, just two years after they were runners—up to chelsea and felt so deflated, over half the team remember that and carried the scars into the final and

they have finally done it, to secure their place in europe's elite. this can be considered probably as a changing of the guard. city will go on and look to be multiple champions league winners but they will enjoy this night and pep guardiola looking very emotional, the first manager in the major european leagues to secure the major european leagues to secure the treble twice, doing it with barcelona back in 2009. a special night for him and a truly special night for him and a truly special night for him and a truly special night for manchester city. before the name night for manchester city. before the game we _ night for manchester city. before the game we were _ night for manchester city. before the game we were talking - night for manchester city. before the game we were talking a - night for manchester city. before the game we were talking a little j the game we were talking a little bit about how sky—high expectations were for manchester city. do you think any of the pressure played a part, especially in the first half? it is a final and they had their chancesin it is a final and they had their chances in the first half, erling haaland has a chance as dead bernardo silva, but inter milan really played their part. great

european pedigree, three times winners, they finished third in this area, they won the italian cup, their manager has really turned things around and got them believing, not with a mediocre set of players, but they work particularly well together as a team and defensively they did so well to frustrate and suffocate all of manchester city's creative players. city had a massive blow in kevin de bruyne. he was injured two years ago and that champions league final against chelsea and went off in that defeat and he was injured as well in the first half and had to go off. it looked to be history repeating, but kevin 0'brien, he wasn't needed in second half, it was rodri, they found a way and this is their night this evening. fill" found a way and this is their night this evening-— this evening. our correspondence live in a standard _

this evening. our correspondence live in a standard bill— this evening. our correspondence live in a standard bill and - live in a standard bill and alongside him are images of cheering fans in manchester as manchester city has won the champions league final completing the treble. —— istanbul. we believe those images in manchester behind and return to ukraine. ukrainian president, volodymyr zelensky, has — for the first time — publically confirmed that his country's counter—offensive against occupying russian forces is underway. it follows a week of such speculation after an escalation of fighting in the south and east of the country. his comments followed talks he'd held in kyiv with the visiting canadian prime minister, justin trudeau. the bbc�*s yalda hakim, who's in kyiv, has been listening to president zelensky speak about the conflict. for the past week, we have heard a lot of speculation around this counteroffensive. has it started, and if so, what will it look like going forward? the world's media and military analysts have all been asking this question, and so today, at the press conference i was at with

volodymyr zelensky, ukraine's president, alongside canada's premier, justin trudeau, president zelensky was asked the question that, in the last 2a hours, we have heard from russia's president, vladimir putin, who confirmed or said that the counteroffensive on the ukraine side had begun. just have a listen to what he had to say. translation: the counteroffensive and defence actions _ are taking place in ukraine. i will not speak at what stage or phase they are, but i am sure that we will feel all of that definitely. i would not trust these or those telegram channels, and, in particular, putin. it seems to me we had lots of occasions and steps after which we understood that we can not trust this kind of information. we need to trust, as it seems to me, our military,

our soldiers, and i trust them. daily, i am in touch with our commanders of different spheres. on vladimir putin, he was very dismissive. he grinned and said, "why is he talking "about our counteroffensive? "he must be feeling it. "he will continue to do so." as i said, again, he kept his cards very close to his chest. he would not give much information away, but did say that he speaks to his commanders daily, and that they were in good spirits. for his part, justin trudeau talked about the ongoing support that canada will continue to provide ukraine in terms of military support as well as aid. we have seen a massive humanitarian crisis in the south—east of the country after that dam was breached, so prime minister trudeau talked about the need for the ongoing support to ukraine. just have a listen. in addition, today i'm announcing that canada will be part -

of the multinational efforts to train fighter pilots, - and to maintain and support - ukraine's fighterjet programme, leveraging canadian- expertise in these areas. we will also be contributing - to the multinational leopard tank maintenance initiative. iwe will provide an additional 288| aim—7 missiles, which will support ukraine in its efforts to defend ukrainian skies. _ and from existing funds, _ we will provide 10,000 rounds of 105 millimetre ammunition - to the ukraine security forces. justin trudeau, canada's prime minister speaking there at that press conference with the volodymyr zelensky today. we don't know how long justin trudeau will be here, but he is part of this wave of western leaders making their way here to the ukrainian capital. it is about a 12—hourjourney from poland to here, so they come to show their support,

even though this country is in a state of war and conflict. you would not know it if you were here in the capital, kyiv. restaurants, cafes are buzzing, they are full of people, they are really trying to get on with their daily lives. in the east and the south—east, that is where the epicentre of this counteroffensive will be, which will go on for many months. for now, we are not getting a lot of information. as this counter—offensive continues, no doubt the ukrainian side will want to give information about their progress and gains, and of course we will hear about the setbacks as well. they have this very small window up to about october and november before the weather changes. we keep hearing about the importance of the spring and summer offensive, because once the winter kicks in, fighting becomes incredibly

difficult, but we will continue our coverage here from the capital, kyiv, as the developments and updates continue. ted kaczynski, better known as the unabomber, has been found dead in his jail cell by prison officers. kaczynski pleaded guilty to killing three people and injuring 23 more during a mass bombing spree between 1978 and 1995. he was sentenced to life without parole in 1996 after evading capture for almost 20 years. the 81—year—old spent the past three decades held at prisons across the us. officials say he was found unresponsive in his cell at a prison in north carolina. now its time for the weather with ben rich. it has been the hottest day of the year so far by a considerable margin with temperatures up to 32 degrees in surrey, and plenty of other places not far behind. but with the heat, we have seen some

showers and thunderstorms in the afternoon and in fact a band of cloud and showery rain pushed in from the south—west and ahead of it, some intense thunderstorms across parts of the midlands, drifting into north—east wales, north—west england. this is where the met office has issued an amber weather warning for thunderstorms through part of the evening. the potential that some spots could see 50 to maye up to 100 millimetres of rain, only in localised locations. the showers drift across northern ireland, northern england and scotland over night, a few more in central and southern england for a time and it will be very warm and muggy with overnight lows for many between 12 and 16 degrees. some areas of low cloud as well to start the morning. some showers and the odd thunderstorm to start off with in scotland. northern ireland, england and wales starting mainly fine, more very warm sunshine but in the afternoon, a fresh clutch of thunderstorms cropping up across parts of southern england, into the midlands, east wales, temperatures again up

to around 30 or maybe 31 celsius. some spells of strong sunshine continuing. northern ireland seeing some showers but perhaps not too intense but some continue in scotland, especially up to the north—west. not quite as warm here as it was during today. looking further ahead, on sunday night it will be very warm and muggy again, some showers and thunderstorms rattling round with some areas of low cloud and mist and some fog patches but clear spells as well. on monday, more very warm sunshine, a scattering of showers and thunderstorms popping up into the afternoon and it will be warm again, temperatures up to around 26 or 27 degrees and i would not be surprised if some places got a little warmer than that. through the week, high pressure remaining just about in charge. the high pressure never quite strong enough to suppress all of the showers so there will still be some showers and thunderstorms here and there but as we develop more of an easterly breeze,

it might be that temperatures drop back for some of us a bit but broadly speaking, staying very warm through the week ahead. now on bbc news, it is time for click. this week, we're taking a deep dive into artificial intelligence, and how it's transforming the world around us. yeah, that includes in healthcare, where we meet the ai helping radiologists to diagnose cancer. you can see these little white dots. the ai is slightly suspicious.

and in the fast moving game of ai artwork, who owns what? and can artists protect their work? for some time artificial intelligence has been all around us. you might not have noticed it, but your video streaming services, social media feeds, the maps on your smart phones, they've all been steadily improving their performance because the computers behind them have been learning. and then last year, something important happened. yeah. ai got human — or at least it felt like it did. companies like google and open ai started showing off stunning photorealistic images like these, all created by ai from short text descriptions. and then ai started having conversations with us. they were starting to generate stuff that felt human.

this field of generative ai seems to have exploded so quickly. chatgtp is the single fastest—growing application in human history. and it keeps getting better. the latest version, gpt�*i, even seems to be able to look at a picture and work out what would happen next. and just look at what the latest ai image generators can do. notjust still pictures, but remarkably good videos as well. this short film was created by one user simply by typing carefully worded text descriptions into his phone. i think the reason many people are now paying attention to ai is that it's finally behaving like the ai we were promised in the movies — computers that we can chat to and that are doing humanlike things. and that's why it has created a really emotive response

in a way that none of the ai built into the devices all around us ever managed to. and that's where the danger lies, because if it behaves like a human, its reasonable to assume that it thinks likea human. but it doesn't. you know those predictive text functions on your phone? well, these try to guess the most likely next word in the sentence based on what you have typed so far. and in really simple terms, that is what these chatbots are doing. they have read millions and billions of sentences online and they have learned what a good sentence looks like — that's why they sound so human, the sentence structure is really good, but there is no guarantee that they will get the facts right, because they don't understand what they are saying. and image generators don't understand what they are drawing. for example, microsoft's bing app now uses the dali image generator. i asked to draw me my initial

made of liquid metal and it made this. pretty decent. it then said would you like me to add some sparks to it, and i said why not, and it turned it into this. imean... where did the s go? the reason is it doesn't know what a letter s is. it doesn't think like a human, it doesn't understand anything. but ai generators like mid journey can do wonderful and weird things. and that's the main weakness here and why we can't trust it. if ai can create anything, then how do we know what's real? i don't think the pope ever went out dressed like this. but if we use it wisely, there is immense possibility. it can crunch data like no human can, and never has that been more important than in healthcare, as mark cieslak has been finding out.

june works as a healthcare assistant. she knows how important breast cancer screening is. i see you've had previous surgery before? yeah that's clear. today, june is having a low level x—ray, or mamogram, performed. it's part of a local breast—screening programme called gemini. so we are running this ai as well to see whether it is able to pick up cancer as well as humans can, and we see these little white dots that the ai is slightly suspicious. we would want to do a biopsy on that recommended, especially because you have had a previous history of it. a biopsy will be performed, removing a small sample of body tissue and sending it for further tests. here at aberdeen royal infirmary, june's scan has been reviewed by ai software as well as human clinicians. dr gerald lipp demonstrates

the process using anonymized scans. so what we see here now, we have a lady who has mammograms on her left side and right side, you are looking for differences. there is a lesion in the left breast here, and of course this is something you would expect a human being. you can just tell there is something different in the pictures there, and if you click on this ai button, it circles an area to check. but the main area of most concern is this area circled here, where the cancer is on the left side. in screening, you want to pick up things that are small before they become big. programmes like this one identify breast cancer in roughly 6 in 1000 women. radiologists, known as readers, examine patient scans for signs of cancer. on average, these human readers scrutinise 5,000 mammograms a year. 250—300 patients will be called back, and 30—110 of those will require closer attention. and there is a chance that with that number

you could miss cancers. within the rules that national screening council have given us, we are not allowed to use the ai automatically as part of the process as yet, so we are using the ai as an extra check at the end of our reading process. in 2016, a private company, keyron medical technologies, began training an ai model called nia using hundreds of thousands of medical scans. itsjob — to identify breast cancer. until now, this ai has been intended as an assistive tool for use by two human radiologists. it has become the foundation of the technology being used in aberdeen. the health service is experiencing massive staff shortages. experimentation with al could relieve some of that pressure. the first clinical evaluation of its kind is being carried out here. ordinarily, two human radiologists would examine every scan, looking for

conditions like breast cancer. but could the technology being tested here one day replace one of those human medical staff with an ai? i think the goal of this evaluation is to see what's the best way we can work with al where there is replacing one of the radiologists, where there is part reading some of the normal mamograms, or where there is to improve our cancer detection as a safety net. this project is a collaboration between the nhs, the university of aberdeen and private companies — microsoft providing cloud computing, and the ai model developed by keyron. the next step of the partnership is that we are taking our ai across the uk to over 30 nhs trusts, to over one million women to gain access to the ai screening. it has been a few weeks sincejune's biopsy, and i caught up with her via videocall. i wondered how she felt about an ai assisting

in such sensitive work. your images are on—screen and people are looking at them, whereas when it's an artificial intelligence, that feeling that somebody is looking in on has gone. the biopsy showed that i do have an early—stage cancer, we certainly caught it at an earlier stage this time, but because i have had previous history with it, i'm going to go in and have a mastectomy, it's not the treatment i want to have, but at the same time it is reassuring that it has been caught. screening programmes are crucial for improving patient outcomes. for now, medical staff are still the first line of defence in protecting against breast cancer, but ai is likely to play a significant role in future life—saving efforts. that was mark showing us how ai in healthcare can be really useful. but on the flipside, when it comes to ai being used to generate things like art,

it can be problematic. yeah, one of the big issues being copywrite. i mean, who should own the images that al creates? it's something that ben derico has been investigating. ai art has taken a massive leap recently. i mean, this one sold for over $100,000 at auction at christie's in 2018. with image generators like dali, stable diffusion, almost anyone can create a new art in a matter of seconds. but the models that makes this art don'tjust do it out of thin air. they have learnt to mimic styles, even specific artists, through a process called training, where the models injest millions, sometimes billions of images, scraped from websites all around the web. combined with text describing the images, they now have a data set that lets them create almost any type of image from a simple text prompt. it produces some interesting stuff, but the problem is many artists never gave their consent for their art to be

used in an image generator like this. so what should artists do? so we have seen art theft before. we have never seen it at this level. this is karla ortiz, she's concept artist in san francisco. a concept artist is a person who provides the first initial visuals to what something could be in something in a movie. she has designed art for magic: the gathering, and even in marvel�*s doctor strange movies. last year, she discovered that her art had been scraped into an ai image data set. especially my fine artwork, and that to me felt really invasive, because i had never given anyone my permission to do that. on midjourney, another popular generator, it's incredibly easy to find posts using karla's name to generate work that looks incredibly similar to hers, and the same is true for dozens of other artists online. so earlier this year karla and a group of other artists filed a class action lawsuit against stability ai

and a group of other ai image generators. in the meantime, karla made the decision to take her work off the internet wherever she could. she figured it was the only way to avoid a computer scrapping her work into an image data set without her consent. but what if she could still show her work online and keep it from being used to help generate new ai art? honestly, we just never had any idea it was such an impactful problem. this is professor ben chow, from the university of chicago. he and his lab say they have developed a solution. they call it glaze. at its core, glaze uses the fact that there is this ginourmous gap, difference between the way humans see visual images and how learning models see visual images. because we see things differently, glaze can make changes that are almost imperceptible to the human eye, but that dramatically alter how a machine sees it. so, if you are an artist,

you glaze your art, post if online, you can rest comfortable in knowing that a model that is trying to steal your stuff from that piece will learn a very different style that is incorrect, and when it is trying to mimic you it will fail, and halt these attacks early. as you can see, the ai artwork generated from a piece with glaze is similar in content but not really in style. to learn more, we asked the team to show us glaze in action. you're going to see some changes already on the texture. thre right side one is the original one, this is the glazed one. you can see the face has some added changes here on the painting. right, so the brushstrokes are blotchier, it looks like there are these kind of yellow patches of pixels in there? exactly. if you had laid thse out in front of me and said tell me what is different, i would be hard—pressed to tell you.

the promise of glaze is exciting for artists, but critics say the ai art generators are taking inspiration the same way a human does — by studying other pieces and learning from them. crucially, they say, these aren't copies. that's lead the companies being sued to ask for the case against them to be dismissed. karla says though that's not a good comparison. i don't see one image, let alone billions of imagery, and instantly like archive it in my mind, and then i'm able to generate exact copies or similar copies in the blink of an eye. some artists said they would be willing to use their work with al image generators, but they say the process should be opt in, not opt out. stability ai says their new generators will be opt out going forward, and adobe says its new image generator, firefly, has only been trained on images from its stock library. but even there, adobe contributors say this type

of usage was never explicit in their agreement. in the meantime, the internet being the internet, people are already trying to break glaze and get around it. i am under no impression that it will last for ever and protect against every form of attack, but we are hopeful that it will buy artists some time and in the meantime, i'm hopeful that glaze will not be the only tool of its kind. for karla, that's the point — to buy artists time for regulation and the public to catch up. when peoplejump in on these and say "oh, this is, wow!", we need to recognise that it is "wow" because of the work that is taken, and all of that work was taken without their consent to use, to train these models so that they can generate that stuff that makes people go "wow". ai art is likely here to stay — so pressure from regulators, input from artists and an informed public will be crucial to make sure these revolutionary tools are built alongside the people

who helped make them possible. that was ben, and this is this week's tech news. microsoft will have to pay $20 million to us federal regulators after it was found the company illegally collected data on children who started xbox accounts. the federal trade commission said the technology company failed to inform parents about the data it was collecting. apple has unveiled its first major hardware in almost a decade — apple vision pro. the long—rumoured headset combines virtual reality and augmented reality and is controlled with eyes, hands and voices. the headset allows you to watch movies, write documents in a virtual world, and even immerse yourself in your own photography. it helps with the connection that you still have with people, so you are fully immersed but you are not cut

off by your reality. binance has been hit with another lawsuit by us financial regulators. the securities and exchange commission said the crypto giant ignored rules that are meant to protect investors in the us. binance said it would defend the platform vigorously. and researchers at the university of cambridge have created a robot that can prepare eight salad recipes. the robot watched 16 videos of a human making a salad, after which it was able to copy them and prepare it itself. bon appetit. just because technology can do something, doesn't mean that we should let it. the ethical issues raised by ai are fundamental to how we regulate and how it becomes part of all our lives. it is time to rethink our interactions, look at all the possibilities and the risks. and somebody who grapples with this a lot of the time is nina schick, who has

written books on deepfakes. nina, we can't even possibly begin to know what's real or not now — how on earth do we deal with this? that is an existential question for society, because i think this is the last moment, if you will, in the internet's history where the majority of data and information content we see online is not generated or created by artificial intelligence. because we are seeing this new field of artificial intelligence, so—called generative ai, that can create content and information in every single digital format. and the use cases of generative ai are so profound, increasingly we will start to be engaging ai—made content, it is going to become ubiquitous. that seems like a pretty unsolvable issue. you have to take a cybersecurity approach because there is no silver bullet that will fix it, but you have to kind of start building layers of resilience around society to navigate this kind of new era of ai.

i mean, you can imagine a world where people are fooled by ai—generated images, but i can also imagine a world where if something is true, people just won't believe it. and so someone who that image affects, maybe a politician or a leader, canjust say, "well, that is fake news", and even though its genuine, because there is so much doubt cast throughout society. you've hit the nail on the head, that is a phenomenon known as the liar's dividend. because it is not only that every piece of content or text can now be generated with al so you can "synthesise" or fake anything, it is also the understanding everything can be created by ai that undermines the integrity of everything that is authentic. but should there be one sort of international way that things are done, is that even possible? well, the eu ai act will be the first international regulatory piece on al which will probably set standards for a lot of the rest of the world.

as for an international body, ijust don't think that is likely. when it comes to jobs, it's obviously going to change the nature of what jobs are available. some jobs may no longer exist, other newjobs will emerge. but of course many people are trained up to do the jobs that exist in current society, so how do we deal with that? i think the impact is going to be bigger than the industrial revolution. i think the labour market will be fundamentally different. now there is this debate going on about, is this going to augment us or is it going to automate us? ultimately i think it will become a very political issue, because it will be both. and the really interesting thing is that this is true now for the first time for white—collar work. do you think there actually is a worry that we are giving more control over to automated systems because they are just faster and better than us — and then every so often something goes wrong, a bit like the financial crisis. sure, i think that's a legitimate concern. it's really important to recognise that these

systems are fallible. they are not purveyors of the truth, they are not omnipotent, they are not gods, right? they are just as good as the training, data and as it turns out, you can already see with chatgpt, they have this propensity to lie, to hallucinate, to make some stuff up. they are not infallible. by giving these machines undue sentience or capabilities, i think we are actually stripping away our own agency, and that is that these systems are still very much in the control of organisations and people. and over the next few years, months and years, we have a chance to think clearly and strategically about how they are going to be integrated into society. thanks so much nina, a lot to think about. and now for a creative look at what could happen if ai did start to take over. yeah, we have been to the misalignment museum in san francisco, which aims to educate people about al and it features. . . paperclips. lots of paperclips.

the paperclip maximiser problem is a thought experiment that posits if an al was developed to create paperclips, it would eventually use all the resources in the world, possibly destroy humanityjust to create more paperclips. the concept of the museum is it in a post—apocalyptic world where ai has destroyed most of humanity, and then it realised that was bad and so it created this new type of memorial. i created the church of gpt for this museum. the idea is you can pray or confess your sins to this vengeful, spiteful but also incredibly wise ai god of the future. yes, unfortunately i have been using them for gaming instead of deep learning. it is a great sin, i know. i'm very sorry.

so this piece is called spambot. they are collectively typing up an ai—generated version of brave new world. this artist was trying to draw attention to the increased proliferation of spam as ai is able to create more and more content. music plays. this is an ai generated music composition. it was programmed to write music in response to bacteria growing in a petri dish. it also raises a lot of questions about ip and copyright ownership in the advent of this type of powerful technology. the museum right now is a pilot, but we are actively using this time to try and develop a founding donor base to get a permanent location. my ideal is to have ten different rooms, it will be an immersive experience that tells part of the story of the development of ai

and the potential futures we could have, both positive and potentially scary. i think it is up to us to make the future that we want. what a great visualisation of what ai might do, if it all goes wrong. yeah, let's try and make sure that doesn't happen, people, all right? good, we're all agreed on that. thanks for watching and we will you soon. hello, there were two mccrimmon parts to the weather saturday, some heat and some thunderstorms —— two main parts. it was the hottest day of the year so far by son martin, 32 in parts of surrey and a lot of other places not far behind. but for

some, that heat in the afternoon and evening spawned some thunderstorms, a dramatic view here in shropshire. it is how it looked on the radar on saturday evening and part of the midlands and east wales, north—west england and into western scotland, some quite intense thunderstorms and a lot of rain falling in some locations. and on sunday, more of the same point more hot sunshine but more scattered thunderstorms put up some showers and storms from the word go in scotland, some in the channel islands, central and southern england and while there will be spelt warm or even hot sunshine through the day, that will only intensify the showers. quite hit and miss, some places are avoiding them but if you catch them in parts of southern england, the midlands, eat well, there could be to ensure wind, thunder and lightning, 30 degrees in london, some could reach 31. northern ireland has espouse a warm sunshine and the odd thunderstorm, scatter shells in northern ireland and some

continuing across scotland. may be not quite as warm here as it was during saturday. on sunday night, another pretty humid affair some showers and thunderstorms set to continue with some areas of low cloud, mist and fog but close belt as well but overnight lows generally of 11-16 as well but overnight lows generally of 11—16 and bear in mind we will only get down to these temperatures briefly because as soon as the sun comes up again on monday, the temperatures will start to climb. plenty of sunshine but again, scattered showers and storms. perhaps a line of storms popping up from london to the midlands and into mid wales. a very warm day again, widely temperatures between 20 and 27 degrees, some places could get a bit warmer than that. deeper into the weak, high pressure remainsjust about in charge, not quite strong enough to suppress all of the shower activity. there will be some showers, may be the odd thunderstorm, and more of an easterly breeze starting to develop so it could mean temperatures drop backjust a little bit but broadly

speaking, a lot of dry weather and sunshine and it will still feel very warm.

live from washington. this is bbc news. history for manchester city — as they complete the treble — winning the champions league. former us president donald trump makes his first public comments

after being indicted for his handling of