to deport asylum seekers to rwanda is unlawful. unless and until the deficiencies in its asylum processes are corrected, removal of asylum seekers to rwanda will be unlawful. the us must stop considering race in university applications, ending a practice that preferred minorities. welcome to verified live, three hours of breaking stories, and checking out the truth behind them. we start in paris, where thousands of people have peacefully through the streets of the suburb of nanterre, to remember the 17—year—old boy shot dead by police on tuesday. the march in memory of nahel was led by his mother

mounia, who waved to the crowds from an open—top truck. his killing — during a traffic stop — provoked rioting across france. this was the scene in paris last night. rioters clashed with police as cars were overturned and set alight. this video captured the police officer pointing his gun at the 17—year—old driver, before pulling the trigger at point—blank range. he died shortly afterwards. the authorities are deploying 40,000 police officers across the country tonight. today, president emmanuel macron convened a crisis meeting with senior ministers. he's described the violence as "unjustifiable". translation: the last few hours have been marred by violence against

schools, town halls, and therefore against all institutions under the republic. and this is absolutely unjustifiable. and i want to thank all those who work to protect these institutions and restore calm. for me, the next few hours must be a time for recollection and respect. one of the people who attended the march in nanterre was mohamed jakoubi — a neighbour of nahel�*s family. he spoke about nahel. translated: he's a young man, he's very kind. he's not evil or a hooligan. what the media are saying is not true. his mum raised him well, his grandmother we know here around the neighbourhood. she is kind and helpful, she loves everyone. the young man left us for nothing. live to paris and my colleague rajini vaidyanathan. what is the met on the streets around nanterre this afternoon? we

“ust around nanterre this afternoon? - just got here after the march had wrapped up, but they were told that nearly 6000 people had taken part. you can hear, it is very noisy, and thatis you can hear, it is very noisy, and that is because there are fire engines are speeding past us, and thatis engines are speeding past us, and that is because earlier we saw huge plumes of smoke in the distance behind. i'm not sure you can see them any more. we don't know what was set on fire, but we know last night a lot of cars, other vehicles, were set alight in those porters. the authorities are bracing themselves for another night of unrest, we have seen an increased police presence, even in the last half an hour, with more officers arriving stop they have moved to other parts of the city. just to give you an id of the geography, thatis give you an id of the geography, that is la defense in the back end,

so we are quite close to the centre. nanterre is worth thousands of people gathered. 0f nanterre is worth thousands of people gathered. of course, the authorities have increased their police presence and also say they are going to be shutting down public transport in the city from about the 7pm in anticipation of what might happen. 7pm in anticipation of what might ha en. ., , ., ., 7pm in anticipation of what might hauen. ., , ., ., . 7pm in anticipation of what might hauen. ., . , happen. lots of more police officers in and around _ happen. lots of more police officers in and around the _ happen. lots of more police officers in and around the streets _ happen. lots of more police officers in and around the streets of - happen. lots of more police officers in and around the streets of paris, | in and around the streets of paris, but is important to underline that this unrest is happening in other parts of the country as well. it is. parts of the country as well. it is. i haven't spoken _ parts of the country as well. it is. i haven't spoken to _ parts of the country as well. it is. i haven't spoken to people - parts of the country as well. it is. i haven't spoken to people in - parts of the country as well. it 3 i haven't spoken to people in those parts of the country, but i have spoken to some of the people who took part in the march, and it is worth expressing their feelings about this. i spoke to a woman earlier who said shejust about this. i spoke to a woman earlier who said she just really felt for nahel�*s family. a 17—year—old boy who had so many hopes and dreams for now isn't alive after being shot by the police. so,

there is a lot of hurt is one of the frustrations and anger. and i spoke to another young man, who is 25, when she was wearing a gopro around his neck. he said he had come to take part in the protest, but he didn't trust the police are taught. he said he didn't really before but he certainly doesn't after the events of the last few days, so he was wearing that to go pro around his neck in case, he said, anything bad happen to him, so he was able to record it. there is a real sense amongst people who attended that much that they policing the city, and as you mention, even in other cities where there has been unrest and protests, that the police in sydney to protect them, that they are not there in the interest. and of course the authorities might say something different. they might say that isn't the case, but of course it is an investigation now. the police officer is being investigated for homicide, for murder, and so

thatis for homicide, for murder, and so that is the real centre of people's grievances here. and there is a lot of short, notjust here in paris and hit nanterre but across france, as you say. hit nanterre but across france, as ou sa . . ~' hit nanterre but across france, as ousa. ., y hit nanterre but across france, as ousa. ., , . hit nanterre but across france, as ousa. .,g , . you say. thank you very much indeed. we will be back _ you say. thank you very much indeed. we will be back in _ you say. thank you very much indeed. we will be back in paris _ you say. thank you very much indeed. we will be back in paris throughout i we will be back in paris throughout the rest of the evening, and of course, as always, if you are stepping away from your television, you can go to our website. earlier, i spoke to a journalist and researcher. she writes about racism and police violence in france, and i spoke to her earlier about the protest today.— spoke to her earlier about the protest today. spoke to her earlier about the rotest toda . ., ., ., protest today. there were a lot of eo - le protest today. there were a lot of peeple gathering _ protest today. there were a lot of people gathering from _ protest today. there were a lot of people gathering from every - protest today. there were a lot of - people gathering from every berthoud bus at the supporters and family and the struggle against police violence. lots of people, lots of young people, who slammed the police violence, who denounced the

impunity, and have asked for justice. impunity, and have asked for 'ustice. ~ . . . impunity, and have asked for 'ustice. ~ ., , ., , ., justice. what is it that people want to see happen? — justice. what is it that people want to see happen? what _ justice. what is it that people want to see happen? what is _ justice. what is it that people want to see happen? what is it - justice. what is it that people want to see happen? what is it they - justice. what is it that people wantl to see happen? what is it they want to see happen? what is it they want to see happen? what is it they want to see changed in france? the? to see happen? what is it they want to see changed in france? they don't want police — to see changed in france? they don't want police violence _ to see changed in france? they don't want police violence any _ to see changed in france? they don't want police violence any more. - to see changed in france? they don't want police violence any more. they| want police violence any more. they don't polished brass scratch more brutality any more. they don't want profiling and harassment, because they know that police here is focused on attacking black men, arab men, roma men, poor men. i don't want that brutality. and i think the obviously, it is notjust about police violence, it is about the state racism, it is about colonial to come about at the violence of politics and so on. and a big hunger about a lot of things which are happening too many times. is about a lot of things which are happening too many times. is there somethin: happening too many times. is there something particular _ happening too many times. is there something particular to _ happening too many times. is there something particular to paris, - happening too many times. is there something particular to paris, or.

happening too many times. is there something particular to paris, or is| something particular to paris, or is it something that other cities and towns in parts of france are thinking and pushing towards us? lilo. thinking and pushing towards us? no, it is not thinking and pushing towards us? iifr, it is not only in paris, it's everywhere. we saw a demonstration in protest, from marseille, from leon, from porto, from small cities and everywhere. —— from bordeaux. and also and overseas territories, because france still has overseas territories like guadalupe, and so on. and police violence happens also here, you know? it is rooted in the slave and colonial histories, so it is always the same people who are targeted. the home secretary has deducted to talk about the plans to bring

refugee seekers to rwanda, which has been declared unlawful. we refugee seekers to rwanda, which has been declared unlawful.— been declared unlawful. we have a robust agreement _ been declared unlawful. we have a robust agreement to _ been declared unlawful. we have a robust agreement to protect - been declared unlawful. we have a. robust agreement to protect asylum seekers from risk of harm. that first relocation flight was unfortunately frustrated by last—minute measures from the european court of human rights in strasbourg, which has had the effect of causing flights while a domestic legal proceedings are ongoing. in december, the divisional court of the high court comprehensively upheld the lawfulness of the partnership, confirming that rwanda was a safe country. thatjudgment was a safe country. thatjudgment was appealed to the court of appeal, which heard the appeal in april of this year, and handed down its judgment earlier today. mr speaker, i respect the court, and welcomed the fact that had unanimously found in the government's favour on the vast majority of the appeal is brought against the policy. unanimously, the court of appeal

confirmed that removing asylum seekers to a safe country is entirely consistent with the refugee convention, including article 31. indeed, the court of appeal found that it indeed, the court of appeal found thatitis indeed, the court of appeal found that it is lawful, in principle, for the government to relocate to people who come to the uk illegally to a safe third country. that the government can designate countries as safe, and that our processes for determining eligibility for relocation welfare. unfortunately, two of the judges were of the view that there were deficiencies in the rwandan asylum system that risk there being a breach of article three of the charter. importantly, their concerns were not that conditions in rwanda would be unsafe, but that there was a possibility that they could be returned to other countries from rwanda per day may suffer ill

treatment. it is therefore simply incorrect to say that the court of appeal has found conditions in rwanda make it unsafe for individuals. the court of appeal has ruled, instead, that there is a risk of reform and to other countries from rwanda. the lord chiefjustice took a different view, agreeing with the high court, he held that there was no real risk of individuals being sent to unsafe countries. he cited the strong assurance given by the rwandan government, the fact that rwanda does not have returns agreements with those countries, under powerful protections provided by monitoring arrangements that would be in place. the result is at the high court's decision that rwanda was a safe third country for the purposes of asylum relocation is reversed. we have a strong

relationship with rwanda, mr speaker, and both sides remain committed to the policy. rwanda is a signatory to the united nations conventions, and has a strong track record of supporting refugees, including from the unhcr. this is a disappointing judgment, and we will seek permission to appeal it. we hope that the process will be swift, and i'm glad that the court of appeal has recognised in paragraph 16 of that summaryjudgment that theirs is an important consideration that should be dealt with in a timely fashion. thisjudgment that should be dealt with in a timely fashion. this judgment is disappointing for the majority of the british people, who have repeatedly voted for controlled migration, and for all those who want to see us deliver on our moral and democratic imperative to stop the boats. i am sure that all members of this house would agree that the british people are

compassionate, reasonable and fair minded. since 2015, we have welcomed half a million people in needs from all over the world, via our global safe and legal writs, as well as via our country's specific routes, encompassing ukraine, hong kong, afghanistan and syria. but they are not naive, mr speaker. while our compassion to help people may be infinite, the public understand that our capacity to do so is finite, and therefore precious. the british people will no longer indulge the polite fiction that we have a duty or infinite capacity to support everyone in the world who is fleeing persecution. noranyone everyone in the world who is fleeing persecution. nor anyone that would simply like to come here to improve their lot and succeeds in making it to our shores. that abuse is unfair

on local communities forced to absorb thousands of illegal arrivals come under the pressure on public services and social cohesion that this entails. it is unfair on taxpayers referred to the hotel bill currently running two £6 million a day, that could rise to £32 million a day by 2026 for people who have broken into this country. it is unfair on those who play by the rules answer want to see an asylum thatis rules answer want to see an asylum that is fit for purpose, that our current system is exploited and turned against us by those with no right to be in the uk. it is unfair on those most in need of protection, in particular women, children and those without the money to pay the people smugglers that are a syhleti system is overwhelmed by fit young men who have paid criminals

thousands of pounds to smuggle them into the uk. —— that are asylum system is overwhelmed. and it is unfair on people and our partners in the developing world that we in the west continue to maintain a system is open to abuse that it incentivises massive flows of economic migration into europe, lining the pockets of people smugglers and returning overseas into graveyards. all in the name of a phony humanitarianism. this is madness, mr speaker, and it must end. and that is why we come on the side of the house, are committed to doing whatever it takes to stop the boats. the government remains resolute that people do exactly that, in partnership with rwanda, and through changes to law. that is the only way we will break the business model of the people smugglers, that is the only way we will save lives, that is the only

way we will stop the boats. mr speaker, i commend this statement to the house. , speaker, i commend this statement to the house. ., ., , ., ~ speaker, i commend this statement to the house. ., ~ the house. yvette cooper. thank you, mr speaker- — the house. yvette cooper. thank you, mr speaker- to _ the house. yvette cooper. thank you, mr speaker. to date _ the house. yvette cooper. thank you, mr speaker. to date shows _ the house. yvette cooper. thank you, mr speaker. to date shows that - the house. yvette cooper. thank you, mr speaker. to date shows that the l mr speaker. to date shows that the prime _ mr speaker. to date shows that the prime minister and the home secretary have no plan to fix the tory's — secretary have no plan to fix the tory's smaller boats chaos, and their_ tory's smaller boats chaos, and their only— tory's smaller boats chaos, and their only policy to send everyone to rwanda — their only policy to send everyone to rwanda is now completely unravelling. they have already admitted it will cost £159,000 to send _ admitted it will cost £159,000 to send every person to rwanda come on top of— send every person to rwanda come on top of the _ send every person to rwanda come on top of the checks they have already written. _ top of the checks they have already written, but now the court has found that ministers didn't even do the basic_ that ministers didn't even do the basic work— that ministers didn't even do the basic work to make sure that the scheme — basic work to make sure that the scheme was legal or say. 0ver four years, _ scheme was legal or say. 0ver four years, there's a tory boats crisis has grown — years, there's a tory boats crisis has grown and grown and they have completely broken the asylum system. they failed _ completely broken the asylum system. they failed to stop criminal gangs taken _ they failed to stop criminal gangs taken hold among our borders, gang centres _ taken hold among our borders, gang centres in _ taken hold among our borders, gang centres in the profits soar from 3,000,004 years ago to more than 180

million _ 3,000,004 years ago to more than 180 million today. the promise four years _ million today. the promise four years ago— million today. the promise four years ago at the end boat crossings in six _ years ago at the end boat crossings in six months, they have gone up more _ in six months, they have gone up more than — in six months, they have gone up more than 20 thoughts and so on. convictions — more than 20 thoughts and so on. convictions for people smuggling have actually dropped. asylum decision—making collapsed, done by one third. _ decision—making collapsed, done by one third, yet the course of the asylum — one third, yet the course of the asylum system have soared. if i foot increase _ asylum system have soared. if i foot increase in _ asylum system have soared. if i foot increase in the cost forjust one person— increase in the cost forjust one person in— increase in the cost forjust one person in the asylum system, that is no one _ person in the asylum system, that is no one else's — person in the asylum system, that is no one else's fault, just a tory mismanagement and chaos. and a soaring _ mismanagement and chaos. and a soaring back or come as a result come _ soaring back or come as a result come up — soaring back or come as a result come up to— soaring back or come as a result come up to a record high of 175,000. -- is _ come up to a record high of 175,000. -- is soaring— come up to a record high of 175,000. —— is soaring the backlog. in the home _ —— is soaring the backlog. in the home office is self projected that those _ home office is self projected that those tory feel will rise to a cost of iii _ those tory feel will rise to a cost of £11 billion, the cost of their failure — of £11 billion, the cost of their failure. and instead of getting a group _ failure. and instead of getting a group of— failure. and instead of getting a group of any of that, all they can come _ group of any of that, all they can come up — group of any of that, all they can come up with is a gimmicks to make things— come up with is a gimmicks to make things worse. this scheme is unworkable, unethical, extortionate expensive, — unworkable, unethical, extortionate expensive, and across the entire meeting — expensive, and across the entire meeting to distraction from the auto practical— meeting to distraction from the auto practical action we should be taking from the _ practical action we should be taking from the plant labour has set up to

stop wasting others money on a failing _ stop wasting others money on a failing scheme to go the criminals and to— failing scheme to go the criminals and to get— failing scheme to go the criminals and to get a stronger agreement with france _ and to get a stronger agreement with france and _ and to get a stronger agreement with france and sort out there's a massive _ france and sort out there's a massive backlog that is costing a fortune — massive backlog that is costing a fortune. action to stop the dangerous boat crossings that are undermining a border security and putting _ undermining a border security and putting lives at risk. but the home secretary — putting lives at risk. but the home secretary has different her rwanda plan, _ secretary has different her rwanda plan, but _ secretary has different her rwanda plan, but here's what the judgment reveals _ plan, but here's what the judgment reveals. not only will it cost £169,000 for every person, there will be _ £169,000 for every person, there will be substantial sums of future aid support. how much? they are expecting — aid support. how much? they are expecting rwanda to take asylum decisions — expecting rwanda to take asylum decisions of the memorandum of understanding, but thejudgment understanding, but the judgment reveals _ understanding, but thejudgment reveals this system only takes around — reveals this system only takes around 100 decisions a year at the moment, — around 100 decisions a year at the moment, has had 100% rejection rate for afghanistan, syria and yemen, and under— for afghanistan, syria and yemen, and under the sl— rwanda deal, the government— and under the sl— rwanda deal, the government breached the memorandum

of understanding to more people were routinely— of understanding to more people were routinely targeted and moved contest only from _ routinely targeted and moved contest only from rwanda, making traffic and buzz _ only from rwanda, making traffic and buzz the _ only from rwanda, making traffic and buzz. the judgment also said rwanda only buzz. the judgment also said rwanda onlv has— buzz. the judgment also said rwanda only has one committee that takes the decisions, and only one eligibility office are preparing cases — eligibility office are preparing cases. so, the idea that the government is going to deliver on its pledges, even the lord chief justice — its pledges, even the lord chief justice, he finds that the scheme could _ justice, he finds that the scheme could be — justice, he finds that the scheme could be lawful, has said it only is on the _ could be lawful, has said it only is on the basis — could be lawful, has said it only is on the basis that the scheme is a small. _ on the basis that the scheme is a small. just — on the basis that the scheme is a small, just 100 people. the home secretary— small, just 100 people. the home secretary talks today i can about the thousands of people being sent, the thousands of people being sent, the lord _ the thousands of people being sent, the lord chiefjustice says of the talk of— the lord chiefjustice says of the talk of the wonder within a few years— talk of the wonder within a few years being a destination for thousands of asylum seekers is political— thousands of asylum seekers is political hyperbole. that thousands of asylum seekers is political hyperbole.— thousands of asylum seekers is political hyperbole. that is yvette coo er, political hyperbole. that is yvette c00per. the _ political hyperbole. that is yvette cooper, the opposition _ political hyperbole. that is yvette cooper, the opposition shadow i political hyperbole. that is yvette - cooper, the opposition shadow home secretary responding to the statement on the latest twist and turn and the government's efforts to push through plans to send asylum seekers who arrive in the uk on boards to rwanda.

live now tojenny phillimore, professor of migration and superdiversity at the university of birmingham. what did you make of the government's reaction? it is what did you make of the government's reaction? it is not surprising _ government's reaction? it is not surprising they _ government's reaction? it is not surprising they are _ government's reaction? it is not surprising they are disappointed j surprising they are disappointed because this is basically all they had, but essentially this is a victory for reality, for human rights in the public purse. it can't possibly work. rights in the public purse. it can't possibly work-— rights in the public purse. it can't possibly work. what is the answer? because obviously _ possibly work. what is the answer? because obviously there _ possibly work. what is the answer? because obviously there is - possibly work. what is the answer? because obviously there is a - because obviously there is a problem, there is a back rub, there are boats that arrive here every day. the government is spending millions of pounds a day to house asylum seekers was not what is the answer if not to send them to rwanda? .. . . answer if not to send them to rwanda? . , , ., answer if not to send them to rwanda?— answer if not to send them to rwanda? . , , ., rwanda? the answer is to fix the s stem rwanda? the answer is to fix the system that _ rwanda? the answer is to fix the system that has _ rwanda? the answer is to fix the system that has become - rwanda? the answer is to fix the system that has become brokenl rwanda? the answer is to fix the l system that has become broken in rwanda? the answer is to fix the - system that has become broken in the last decade. it is about speedier, more effective asylum claim processing. it is about a loving asylum seekers to work, so that they can cover much of their own costs. it is about looking at the lessons

we have learned from community sponsorship and homes from ukraine, looking at different kinds of housing solutions, and learning from the good practice that is going on elsewhere. and i really need to point it here, that's all ideal is based on the premise that people will know that there is a deterrent, that they're going to be sent to rwanda. there is no good poor to apply for asylum. people don't have access to this information, the government himself and others from their own research. so, it is based on a completely false false premise, it can't and it will not work. even if it goes through the supreme court. �* ,., g court. but the government might say, it is not our— court. but the government might say, it is not our responsibility, _ court. but the government might say, it is not our responsibility, as - court. but the government might say, it is not our responsibility, as you - it is not our responsibility, as you heard, the home secretary it is not our duty or capacity to support people who come to this country. if you do allow people to work, and make it a lot easier, there is an argument that some people put forward that that would make people want to come to this country, more,

not less. in want to come to this country, more, not less. , ., , want to come to this country, more, not less. , . , ., not less. in 25 years, i have never seen any — not less. in 25 years, i have never seen any evidence _ not less. in 25 years, i have never seen any evidence for— not less. in 25 years, i have never seen any evidence for this. - not less. in 25 years, i have never seen any evidence for this. it - not less. in 25 years, i have never seen any evidence for this. it is i seen any evidence for this. it is important to point out, last year, 73% of people who applied for asylum, for the right on a small boat or by other means, and let's face it there aren't many other means, were successful at the initial decision states, and many more of those will be successful on appeal. these are genuine claims. if you look at the number of displaced people globally, it is a record figure, at 110 million. we are doing in the uk, something tiny compared to the countries that are alongside the places where there is conflict and displacement, and in fact in relation to other countries in europe. it is blown out of all proportion, it is a political gimmick, it is something to stand behind in the face of the chaos in the economy and other aspects of our society. it isn't a massive problem around under small boats come and if he were to introduce a safe and

legal writs and start talking to the rest of europe's, probably with the unhcr, bait be able to find some more constructive solution. this is not the answer, it will never work. —— weight might be able to. thank you so much for taking the time to speak to us today. the us supreme court has banned the use of race and ethnicity in university admissions, dealing a major blow to a decades—old practice that boosted educational opportunities for african—americans and other minorities. live now to washington dc and our correspondentjessica parker. just being exactly what this means for university admissions and why this is important. that for university admissions and why this is important.— for university admissions and why this is important. at the supreme court has done _ this is important. at the supreme court has done today _ this is important. at the supreme court has done today is _ this is important. at the supreme | court has done today is effectively banned the consideration of race or ethnicity as a factor amongst student hopefuls who are trying to get into university or college, as it is described here in the us. as

you were saying, this is a long set of presidents, going back more than 40 years. the kind of a framework for university couldn't search quarters, for example, on race, but they could take it into consideration. two cases that are good this was leading to discrimination against white students and asian students, they brought those cases against university of north carolina and harvard as well. when the judgment handed down today has handed them a victory. it has a split along expected dividing lines. the ruling was about six votes to three, not a surprise given the conservative leaning of the court. and the reaction has likewise been quite predictable as well. you have had conservatives welcoming this decision, saying it has been a practice of discrimination. at others from the liberal side to sink as far as this year something of a disaster, that they feel this will mean that underrepresented groups now have a harder time trying to get into universities, particularly

extremely competitive ones. thank ou ve extremely competitive ones. thank you very much _ extremely competitive ones. thank you very much indeed. _ stay with us here on bbc news. hello again. the weather front we had to start the day continues to push its bridge, and for the mass majority of the uk we are looking at fine weather with some sunshine to take through the afternoon. that said, there will be so much i was popping up there will be so much i was popping up for scotland and northern ireland. and there is be so much i was popping up for scotland and northern ireland. 0n the resort where the front, the dregs of rain loitering across in the last exams. the significance of that as it was more rain that had fallen for the entirety of the month ofjune in

andrew's field. that rainbowspark, but it has been a particular time of eastern england. through the rest of the afternoon, one or two showers propping up, and also literature for northern england, parts of the midlands and wales, but for the vast majority of these areas it should stay dry. feeling a lot fresher now that that front has moved through. the more pleasant fuel to the weather, has between 18 and 23 today. overnight, going to continue today. overnight, going to continue to see showers working into scotland and edited in cloud will thicken for northern ireland, wales and south—west england. we will get damp weather returning here. local, misty conditions and some drizzle light rain. friday, as is as warm front moves in from the west, that will see a return of more humid air. it will feel quite muggy once again come of low cloud, bits and pieces of drizzle, particular across western areas, and probably some low cloud and fog hanging around some of the hilly areas and the west as

well. temperatures still reaching the high teens to low 20s. into the weekend, low pressure booster to the north of the uk, bringing rain or showers to northern areas, and it will be quite breezy as well. but the winds will be coming in from the west or north westerly direction, and they will be tracking in much fresher air again on saturday. it is a taper most of us will see bright weather with some sunshine, so much for northern ireland, a few for north west england, and fairly frequent showers for the north—west of scotland. temperatures could still reach the mid 20s and the best of the sun setting is. for sunday, a similar kind of day. quite brisk north—westerly wind, prolonged outbreaks of rain in the highlands, orkney and shetland. where was he the best of the sunshine, still filling were more weather temperatures and high teens are low 20s. coolerfor the temperatures and high teens are low 20s. cooler for the north—west temperatures and high teens are low 20s. coolerfor the north—west of scotland.

this is bbc news. the headlines: the mother of a teenager shot dead by french police leads a march in his memory through the paris suburb where he died. after a second night of rioting prompted by the killing, 40,000 police officers will be on french streets tonight. the uk court of appeal rules the government's plan to deport asylum seekers to rwanda is unlawful. and fatima putin poses a greater