on the main road east of the square at 10.23... hong kong's pro—democracy movement was heavily influenced by the events in beijing in 1989. onjune 4th, 3a years ago, hundreds — possibly thousands — died when the people's liberation army put an end to student protesters in beijing. today is the anniversary. hong kong was once the only place on chinese soil that publicly commemorated the dead. today, the police threaten to arrest anyone who attempts to mark the day. some are determined. flowers for the dead — a political statement. a disturbance to public order.

ronson is reporting. he's just returned from a six—month fellowship in the uk. he's returned to hong kong to face trial. a journalist has been detained. it struck a chord with ronson. ijust came to say we can try our best to survive. ijust miss hong kong too much. ijust love hong kong too much. i never think about future, maybe jail, maybe persecution, maybe something like that. but i still think that... i take responsibility for my decision. so i stay here.

danny vincent in hong kong. that's all from us tonight. kirsty�*s here on monday. till then, have a good weekend. goodnight. this is bbc news. we could hear fireworks being _ this is bbc news. we could hear fireworks being laid _ this is bbc news. we could hear fireworks being laid off - this is bbc news. we could hear fireworks being laid off and - this is bbc news. we could hear fireworks being laid off and a - this is bbc news. we could hear fireworks being laid off and a lot| fireworks being laid off and a lot of vandalism and violence in today,

as we been surveying the scene, we saw the violence. the police station here, police vans as we've been saying, 16,000 police officers being deployed and that's more than last night across the country. in other parts of the country, we have seen reports of the violence already this evening. again, it is another night thatis evening. again, it is another night that is unpredictable but once again, authorities are bracing themselves for more violence. mai; themselves for more violence. may cure the police _ themselves for more violence. may cure the police station we are at this statement from france's maine police union saying that they were combating a wild gang and it's time to fight and eradicate these pests. what sense do you get being there in france and woodshop are the police doing to quell these protests? i mean, the thing that's complicated is many people who have been taking

part in this violence blame the police and say that is why they are out on the streets the first place. it is complicated. this all began after the death of nahal, 17—year—old boy stopped by the police at a traffic signal and was shot dead by a police officer and in the subsequent days, violence erupted. that was captured on camera, but the killing of nahal and many people we have spoken to say that what happened if there was no camera? people would not have known about what happened to him and there are many other nahal that people have never known about because there were no cameras capturing the incident and people say this is part of a systemic problem with the police in france and some people have spoken to a go as far as to say they believe the french police are racist and we had a report from the united nations today which is quite damning about the way they say the french police they believe targets

minorities disproportionately. you heard from the french government, the french foreign ministry rebutting that and saying there were no foundations to what the un was saying about as strong accusations coming from the united nations. at the end of the day, these protests boil down to what many say is a far deeper issue which was stamped or sparked by the killing of 17—year—old nahal. sparked by the killing of 17-year-old nahal. sparked by the killing of 17- ear-old nahal. . ~ , ., . 17-year-old nahal. thank you so much for our 17-year-old nahal. thank you so much for your reporting- _ the us supreme court has wrapped up its 2023 term with two major rulings today. the court ruled in favor of a christian website designer who refused to provide wedding services to same—sex couples, violating a colorado state law that prohibited businesses from refusing service because of sexual orientation. the nation's highest court now says that law violates the first amendement. the court also rejected president biden's plan to forgive hundreds—of—billions of dollars in student loans.

under the biden administration's plan, 43 million american borrowers would have been eligible for student loan forgiveness. 26 million had already applied. they each would have had up to 20—thousand—dollars worth of loans forgiven. the plan would cost over 400—billion dollars. the court ruled that the president doesn't have the authority to simply sign off on such funds. later in the day biden announced new actions to provide debt relief, including a i2—month on—ramp payment plan. which runs from october 2023 to the end of september 2024. the white house says the plan will to protect the most vulnerable borrowers from the worst consequences of missed payments following the restart. meaning that that financially vulnerable borrowers who miss monthly payments during this period will not considered delinquent, reported to credit bureaus, placed in default, or referred to debt collection agencies for 12 months. biden condemned the court's

ruling, saying the court �*mis—interpreted the constitution'. here's more of what he had to say. i believe was the worst decision to strike down my student debt relief. i would not stop fighting to give them what they need. we need to find a new way. and we are moving as fast as we can. chris, i am announcing today a new path consistent with today's willing to provide student debt relief to as many borrowers as possible, as quickly as possible. for more on these rulings, i spoke with congressman bobby scott. he's a democratic congressman from virginia and ranking member of the house committee on education and the workforce. given this latest decision on the president loan forgiveness programme. but what you say the students that might be worrying now about how they could afford to pay for university? it is

about how they could afford to pay for university?— for university? it is instructive to see how we _ for university? it is instructive to see how we got _ for university? it is instructive to see how we got here. _ for university? it is instructive to see how we got here. states - for university? it is instructive to | see how we got here. states used for university? it is instructive to - see how we got here. states used to pay two _ see how we got here. states used to pay two thirds of the state college and now _ pay two thirds of the state college and now it's less than one third in the programme which is money available — the programme which is money available to low income students to help pay— available to low income students to help pay for college used to cover about _ help pay for college used to cover about 80% of the cost to go to the state college and now it is less than _ state college and now it is less than 30% — state college and now it is less than 30% and all of that extra money, — than 30% and all of that extra money, the cap is been covered over the years— money, the cap is been covered over the years by— money, the cap is been covered over the years by student loans. we have all the _ the years by student loans. we have all the people saying they work their— all the people saying they work their way— all the people saying they work their way through college, yet, big grant _ their way through college, yet, big grant that— their way through college, yet, big grant that covered 80% of the cost and permit the cover 20 and other students _ and permit the cover 20 and other students of to pay almost the whole thing _ students of to pay almost the whole thing and _ students of to pay almost the whole thing. and that's how we got here and students have incurred a massive debt and _ and students have incurred a massive debt and the forgiveness programme was debt and the forgiveness programme wasjust_ debt and the forgiveness programme wasjust a _ debt and the forgiveness programme wasjust a modest relief debt and the forgiveness programme was just a modest relief for what debt and the forgiveness programme wasjust a modest relief for what is become _ wasjust a modest relief for what is become overbearing debt. it turns

out that _ become overbearing debt. it turns out that about half the people with debt would've been totally wiped out with that _ debt would've been totally wiped out with that little relief. we debt would've been totally wiped out with that little relief.— with that little relief. we are at the present _ with that little relief. we are at the present earlier _ with that little relief. we are at the present earlier in _ with that little relief. we are atl the present earlier in democrats with that little relief. we are at - the present earlier in democrats as well of been saying they want to continue to fight for debt relief in dc any action taking place this week by congress? the dc any action taking place this week by congress?— dc any action taking place this week by congress? the republicans are in control of the _ by congress? the republicans are in control of the house _ by congress? the republicans are in control of the house and _ by congress? the republicans are in control of the house and they - by congress? the republicans are in control of the house and they have l control of the house and they have shown _ control of the house and they have shown no — control of the house and they have shown no interest in helping people pay for— shown no interest in helping people pay for college education and just absolutely none. and they view it as absolutely none. and they view it as a privilege _ absolutely none. and they view it as a privilege and a pink democrats view_ a privilege and a pink democrats view it— a privilege and a pink democrats view it as — a privilege and a pink democrats view it as something that ought to be available to everybody. and it is a strategy — be available to everybody. and it is a strategy for uplifting yourself from _ a strategy for uplifting yourself from poverty and into the middle class _ from poverty and into the middle class and — from poverty and into the middle class and would not be available to everyone — class and would not be available to everyone. is class and would not be available to eve one. , ., , ., everyone. is there anything that can be done to help _ everyone. is there anything that can be done to help students _ everyone. is there anything that can be done to help students pay - everyone. is there anything that can be done to help students pay for - be done to help students pay for university? the be done to help students pay for university?— university? the president will continue with _ university? the president will continue with debt _ university? the president will continue with debt relief - university? the president will continue with debt relief and | university? the president will. continue with debt relief and we also need — continue with debt relief and we also need to significantly increase

the grant — also need to significantly increase the grant so you want to take out as much _ the grant so you want to take out as much of— the grant so you want to take out as much of a _ the grant so you want to take out as much of a loan everyone to reduce the interest on student loans so that payments go directly to principal and not so much to interest— principal and not so much to interest and some of the forgiveness programmes that the president has described _ programmes that the president has described our income —based we pay a percentage _ described our income —based we pay a percentage of your income for so nrany_ percentage of your income for so many years— percentage of your income for so many years and then after those years. _ many years and then after those years. your _ many years and then after those years, your discharge. he wants to make _ years, your discharge. he wants to make them — years, your discharge. he wants to make them more generous and more than affordable. we are trying to do the student loan forgiveness programme with another statute so that perhaps we can get that done and we _ that perhaps we can get that done and we have not given up on that. we need to— and we have not given up on that. we need to make sure that the colleges are affordable and the number of things— are affordable and the number of things that we are working on right now so— things that we are working on right now so we — things that we are working on right now so we have to acknowledge that the republicans in congress have shown _ the republicans in congress have shown very little if any interest. to stick— shown very little if any interest. to stick it — shown very little if any interest. to stick it to the major ruling about affirmative action, —— to get

to the major. if you are qualified, you should be admitted to a university regardless of your background or your ethnicity. initial response to that argument? many of them have discriminatory disparity— many of them have discriminatory disparity impacts. for example, we have shown — disparity impacts. for example, we have shown that some of the standardised tests are racially discriminatory. they gave the test, they don't — discriminatory. they gave the test, they don't say that those were discriminated against by the test a disadvantage. they do not say the legacy. _ disadvantage. they do not say the legacy, which is an idea that if your— legacy, which is an idea that if your parents or grandparents went to college _ your parents or grandparents went to college when it was much more are much _ college when it was much more are much less— college when it was much more are much less diverse, that gives an advantage — much less diverse, that gives an advantage to whites. they do not argue _ advantage to whites. they do not argue about that. there are a number

of factors— argue about that. there are a number of factors that are involved in now someone — of factors that are involved in now someone gets qualified and if you want to— someone gets qualified and if you want to make it fair, yet to make it fair. want to make it fair, yet to make it fair~ you _ want to make it fair, yet to make it fair. you cannot have discrimination on tests. _ fair. you cannot have discrimination on tests, discrimination on legacy, discrimination and we still have schools — discrimination and we still have schools that are segregated racially now as _ schools that are segregated racially now as they were in the 19605. minority— now as they were in the 19605. minority 5tudent5 tend to go to schools — minority 5tudent5 tend to go to schools that are underfinanced and so, how _ schools that are underfinanced and so, how can — schools that are underfinanced and so, how can it be fair that you go to a school— so, how can it be fair that you go to a school like that and then get judged _ to a school like that and then get judged like someone went to a better school~ _ judged like someone went to a better school~ you _ judged like someone went to a better school. you do not have ap cour5e5 school. you do not have ap courses and in _ school. you do not have ap courses and in berkeley, at one time, after black— and in berkeley, at one time, after black students in california could not qualify because they didn't go to a school with ap cour5e5 not qualify because they didn't go to a school with ap courses to get your gpa, — to a school with ap courses to get your gpa, your grade point average of 40 _ your gpa, your grade point average of 4.0. a , your gpa, your grade point average of4.0. , , .,, your gpa, your grade point average of4.0. , , ., of 4.0. many democrats have criticised _ of 4.0. many democrats have criticised the _ of 4.0. many democrats have criticised the supreme - of 4.0. many democrats have criticised the supreme court | of 4.0. many democrats have i criticised the supreme court for being too conservative, for being out of touch with americans and there is a group of senate and house

democrats that have reintroduced a bill that will add four seats to the supreme court. president biden does not seem to support this, is this something that you would support? we have to go to the normal process intellect — have to go to the normal process intellect presidency can make the appointments. the problem of adding people _ appointments. the problem of adding people and adding fourjustices to the supreme court is that if the next _ the supreme court is that if the next president is elected, he will add five — next president is elected, he will add five justices in the supreme court _ add five justices in the supreme court and — add five justices in the supreme court and you just keep growing and growing _ court and you just keep growing and growing depending on how many you need to— growing depending on how many you need to get a majority. we lost the election— need to get a majority. we lost the election in— need to get a majority. we lost the election in 2016 and we have been paying _ election in 2016 and we have been paying for that ever since. we need the court _ paying for that ever since. we need the court to— paying for that ever since. we need the court to actually rule consistently. we've had presidents rewrapped the decision on abortion, affirmative — rewrapped the decision on abortion, affirmative action, they've returned, 40 or 50 years of presidents on the discrimination

case _ presidents on the discrimination case -- — we need to make sure we have a legislature — we need to make sure we have a legislature that will make things fair. ~ ., ., ., fair. we have to leave it there. democratic _ fair. we have to leave it there. democratic congressman - fair. we have to leave it there. democratic congressman from | fair. we have to leave it there. - democratic congressman from virginia and ranking member on the house committee and the workforce, thank you so much for your time. we just heard from democratic congressman bobby scott on today's decisions but his colleagues on the other side of the aisle are praising the rulings including hous majority leader kevin mccarthy who called the student loan initiative "unlawful," said today's decision would mean that americans without student loans "are no longer forced" to pay for those who do. and nikki haley, one of the 2024 republican presidential candidates, applauded the court during a summit on friday. it will make tonightjust say god bless the supreme court? thea;r it will make tonightjust say god bless the supreme court? they are makin: a bless the supreme court? they are making a lot _ bless the supreme court? they are making a lot of _ bless the supreme court? they are making a lot of wrongs _

bless the supreme court? they are making a lot of wrongs right. - bless the supreme court? they are making a lot of wrongs right. we i making a lot of wrongs right. we have seen, they have corrected things on religious liberty, we're sitting there correcting things on student loans. any affirmative action is really important. and the reason it's important is because the liberals continue to try and put minorities down. around the world and across the uk. this is bbc news. receiving funding from the council and get one of the counsellors represent this area of the authority money. he's fallen behind on council tax payment. money. he's fallen behind on council tax payment-— tax payment. like many residents within the area _ tax payment. like many residents within the area of _ tax payment. like many residents within the area of dry _ tax payment. like many residents within the area of dry pay - tax payment. like many residents within the area of dry pay in - tax payment. like many residents within the area of dry pay in the i within the area of dry pay in the council tax and putting food on the table. . . . council tax and putting food on the table. ., . ., , ,, , council tax and putting food on the table. ., , ,, table. the financial pressures by . ms are table. the financial pressures by gyms are merged _ table. the financial pressures by gyms are merged right - table. the financial pressures by gyms are merged right across i table. the financial pressures byl gyms are merged right across the region. he is being supported by the charity and venous and they have set

up this pop—up shop in the shopping centre for six weeks. bags up this pop-up shop in the shopping centre for six weeks.— centre for six weeks. bags of pasta and sauce and _ centre for six weeks. bags of pasta and sauce and potatoes _ centre for six weeks. bags of pasta and sauce and potatoes us, - centre for six weeks. bags of pasta and sauce and potatoes us, peoplej and sauce and potatoes us, people are giving — and sauce and potatoes us, people are giving those back and saying, have _ are giving those back and saying, have you — are giving those back and saying, have you got something cheaper for me to _ have you got something cheaper for me to cook — have you got something cheaper for me to cook-— you're live with bbc news. returning now to a big week of rulings from the us supreme court. earlier on friday, the court struck down presidentjoe biden's student debt forgiveness programme. the nation's highest court rejected the proposal to cancel student loan debt for some 43—million americans, saying the education department had acted without congressional authority. and, as we heard earlier, the court ruled in favour of a christian website designer who refused to provide wedding services to same—sex couples.

let's get more on these rulings now. joining me live isjustin levitt, constitutional law professor at loyola law school and josh gerstein, senior legal affairs reporter at politico. josh, justice gorusch cited two previous cases in the majority opinion. what did we learn from what he wrote in his opinion? it been reviewed by an issue of freedom of speech. is that you see it? , , ., ., freedom of speech. is that you see it? , ., , ., it? this is a hard case. it is not only about _ it? this is a hard case. it is not only about freedom _ it? this is a hard case. it is not only about freedom of- it? this is a hard case. it is not only about freedom of speech | only about freedom of speech comments by public accommodation and thatis comments by public accommodation and that is what makes it so hard. the graphic designer it doesn'tjust talk about what you want to do with websites in her time but she was offering a service to all the public from recording offices to anybody

who wants to can come to me for these services. which also involves her speech. these services. which also involves herspeech. in these services. which also involves her speech. in that makes or takes a lot harder in mixed future cases a lot harder in mixed future cases a lot harder in mixed future cases a lot harder when it comes to determining whether services are really about providing goods that do not depend on speech or have an expressive component to them. band not depend on speech or have an expressive component to them. and in writin: the expressive component to them. and in writing the majority _ expressive component to them. and in writing the majority opinion _ expressive component to them. and in writing the majority opinion stated in previous cases what did we learn from what we saw there the majority opinion? to from what we saw there the ma'ority oinion? ., , , ., , ., opinion? to feel very strongly that they should _ opinion? to feel very strongly that they should be _ opinion? to feel very strongly that they should be noted _ opinion? to feel very strongly that they should be noted recently - opinion? to feel very strongly that they should be noted recently in l opinion? to feel very strongly that | they should be noted recently in an opinion— they should be noted recently in an opinion substantially broadened lgbt ri-hts opinion substantially broadened lgbt rights in _ opinion substantially broadened lgbt rights in the united states in ways that i_ rights in the united states in ways that i think even some advocate starting — that i think even some advocate starting unthinkable just a few years— starting unthinkable just a few years ago but in this opinion, comes back and _ years ago but in this opinion, comes back and says part of the price of having _ back and says part of the price of having those broad protections that we have _ having those broad protections that we have to — having those broad protections that we have to show tolerance in the public _ we have to show tolerance in the public sphere to people who have views _ public sphere to people who have views that we disagree with. but

it'sjust — views that we disagree with. but it'sjust us — views that we disagree with. but it'5ju5t us would views that we disagree with. but it's just us would say the complication here is that we have a film complication here is that we have a right of— complication here is that we have a right of cases from the civil rights movement— right of cases from the civil rights movement in the 19605 to talk about black patrons wanting to go to barbecues and restaurants in the side of— barbecues and restaurants in the side of the — barbecues and restaurants in the side of the united states and the owners— side of the united states and the owners of— side of the united states and the owners of those establishments making — owners of those establishments making many of the same sorts of arguments— making many of the same sorts of arguments saying that their religious lives, their personal views— religious lives, their personal views did _ religious lives, their personal views did not allow for integration in the _ views did not allow for integration in the court pretty uniformly said that was— in the court pretty uniformly said that was not a valid argument and if you're running a restaurant, it was too bad _ you're running a restaurant, it was too bad if— you're running a restaurant, it was too bad. if you are in the commercial business, you have to serve _ commercial business, you have to serve all— commercial business, you have to serve all of— commercial business, you have to serve all of them under civil rights laws and _ serve all of them under civil rights laws and fear of this exception that carts out— laws and fear of this exception that carts out the significant amount of speech— carts out the significant amount of speech and the questions was in the coming _ speech and the questions was in the coming years or how much speech is to be _ coming years or how much speech is to be involved, we have a hamburger chain— to be involved, we have a hamburger chain here _ to be involved, we have a hamburger chain here that putsjohn 316 on to be involved, we have a hamburger chain here that puts john 316 on the bottom _ chain here that puts john 316 on the bottom of— chain here that puts john 316 on the bottom of the cups that you get so the end. _ bottom of the cups that you get so the end. is— bottom of the cups that you get so the end, is that enough speech that they can _ the end, is that enough speech that they can start to observe the

religious— they can start to observe the religious views over who can come into the _ religious views over who can come into the restaurant? probably not be can come _ into the restaurant? probably not be can come up— into the restaurant? probably not be can come up all sorts of cases that will really— can come up all sorts of cases that will really test this proposition. and where do we draw the line what is the supreme court draw the line because it was protected under the law allows freedom of speech pride in perspective the really tricky questions. in perspective the really tricky questions-— in perspective the really tricky ruestions. ,., ., , ., questions. report realised what he was sa in: questions. report realised what he was saying and _ questions. report realised what he was saying and parallels _ questions. report realised what he was saying and parallels on - questions. report realised what he was saying and parallels on the - was saying and parallels on the surface from the 60s and wanting to take itself out of the red zone, it emphasises every turn that has this case cams to record, the woman with the graphics design services would serve any customer, was only the message that she was protesting in the court said we are not talking about discrimination against who comes in, we're only talking about the very distinctive speech dependent services. i think the court is not going to broaden this principle out terribly much because

it recognises exactly as joe principle out terribly much because it recognises exactly asjoe said, this is a very slippery slope not far over the surface leading to all kinds of exclusion, all kinds of shutting out disfavored minority groups across society and there is a raft of precedent that those anti—discrimination laws like the one in colorado and make sure that every person is the right to be served equally. and i think you'll find that this is a relatively small carved out in the next case is going to provide real problems in the court trying to decide how much is too much. , ., , ., court trying to decide how much is too much. , .,, ., , ., ., too much. this was a big one for the president, too much. this was a big one for the president. joe _ too much. this was a big one for the president, joe biden _ too much. this was a big one for the president, joe biden student - too much. this was a big one for the president, joe biden student debt i president, joe biden student debt relief programme being struck down as unconstitutional. the presidents of the court misinterpreted the constitution and the very strong remarks about the court this week as well. with you think of the president's argument here? despite what the president _ president's argument here? despite what the president said, _ president's argument here? despite what the president said, do - president's argument here? despite what the president said, do not - what the president said, do not think— what the president said, do not think it — what the president said, do not think it was a case by the

constitution, the survey takes about what the _ constitution, the survey takes about what the authorities are in the biden— what the authorities are in the biden administration oversee student loans in— biden administration oversee student loans in they use a rather obscure way to— loans in they use a rather obscure way to try— loans in they use a rather obscure way to try to— loans in they use a rather obscure way to try to put this debt relief plan forward by linking it to the covid-i9 — plan forward by linking it to the covid—19 pandemic and saying this was necessary to cure aftereffects of the _ was necessary to cure aftereffects of the covid—19 pandemic at the court _ of the covid—19 pandemic at the court essentially did not buy that. we saw _ court essentially did not buy that. we saw a — court essentially did not buy that. we saw a rather heated battle court between _ we saw a rather heated battle court between the conservatives in the liberals _ between the conservatives in the liberals about who was stepping out of the _ liberals about who was stepping out of the appropriate role here and i think— of the appropriate role here and i think the — of the appropriate role here and i think the liberals felt there was a animus _ think the liberals felt there was a animus towards this debt relief programme because of sin is a liberal— programme because of sin is a liberal undertaking by the biden administration is being held to an unfair— administration is being held to an unfair standard and the conservatives felt that you shouldn't have the executive branch making _ shouldn't have the executive branch making decisions that allowed literally— making decisions that allowed literally hundreds of billions of dollars —

literally hundreds of billions of dollars without a rather explicit authorisation and so, and a sense, it was— authorisation and so, and a sense, it was a _ authorisation and so, and a sense, it was a bit— authorisation and so, and a sense, it was a bit of— authorisation and so, and a sense, it was a bit of a mundane dispute over— it was a bit of a mundane dispute over how— it was a bit of a mundane dispute over how to— it was a bit of a mundane dispute over how to interpret particular statutes — over how to interpret particular statutes but in a bigger sense, i think— statutes but in a bigger sense, i think it — statutes but in a bigger sense, i think it was the most politically significant case of the term from the court — significant case of the term from the court and politically significant potentially for the 2024 presidential election because there are a lot _ presidential election because there are a lot of people who are expected to have _ are a lot of people who are expected to have this— are a lot of people who are expected to have this money in the park that probably will not have it in their pocket — probably will not have it in their pocket now and the biden administration is going to say, planned — administration is going to say, planned the republican appointed supreme court for that. swimming out here a bit, supreme court for that. swimming out here a bit. many _ supreme court for that. swimming out here a bit, many of— supreme court for that. swimming out here a bit, many of the _ supreme court for that. swimming out here a bit, many of the recent - here a bit, many of the recent issues that have come before the supreme court, if you look at abortion rights and you look at lgbt q abortion rights and you look at lgbt 0 rights, they appeared be fairly settled in terms of case law in terms of public opinion, broad support for these kinds of things. how surprised are you that the supreme court actually decided to take up cases like these? share

supreme court actually decided to take up cases like these?- take up cases like these? are not particularly _ take up cases like these? are not particularly surprised _ take up cases like these? are not particularly surprised by - take up cases like these? are not particularly surprised by more - particularly surprised by more dismayed. it is true that a lot of theseissues dismayed. it is true that a lot of these issues have been settled with extensive president and more progressive and conservative courts. this court is shown a very distinctive proclivity for undoing results when it doesn't like the answer. a featured american law where hard cases are supposed be hard but they're supposed to be a film on the scale for stability, for keeping the laws that is members of this court, including off in a five person majority are ready to throw those all thumbs on the scale of the window whenever they don't like past president. they were put on the court for this reason. they are very conservative, they are radically conservative, they are radically conservative in the sense of going to depart from settled expectations and that was part of their hiring discussion. as part of theirjob interview where they would take bold

steps. we interview where they would take bold ste s. ~ . interview where they would take bold ste s. . ., ., interview where they would take bold ste s. ~ ., ., ., steps. we will have to leave it there, steps. we will have to leave it there. so _ steps. we will have to leave it there, so sorry. _ steps. we will have to leave it there, so sorry. my— steps. we will have to leave it there, so sorry. my professor| steps. we will have to leave it l there, so sorry. my professor at steps. we will have to leave it - there, so sorry. my professor at the university, former deputy assistant attorney general. senior legal affairs reporter, thank you so much to you both and stay with us right here on bbc news. hello there. after what we had on friday, it's hard to believe that thisjune could be the warmest on record. across north yorkshire, temperatures were around 16 degrees in the afternoon. some other parts of the country were colder still. we're going to find more sunshine, though, over the weekend, the start ofjuly, in this clearer slot with the thicker, lower cloud moving away, taking the rain away as well. we're going to be left with more of a north south split this weekend with a sunnier, warmer weather in the south. the showers continuing further north. we'll have some stronger winds as well. it could be quite a cloudy start for many, but we'll see the showers in the midlands, the south east moving away.

sunnier skies developing in the south, but sunshine and showers will continue in scotland, northern ireland and also northern england. frequent showers in the north and west of scotland where it will be quite windy and it may feel still rather chilly, but we could make 18 degrees this time in scotland and northern ireland, 23 or 24 in the south east. so a bit warmer than it was on friday. and for the cricketers, well, there could be one or two showers left over for the start of play. otherwise, it looks like it's going to be dry with some sunshine, a little bit breezy out there, mind you. and the winds, if anything, coming all the way back from iceland and greenland. so it's never going to be particularly warm. and that low pressure sitting close to scotland will keep it windy and wet in the far north of the mainland. more showers are to come on sunday across other parts of scotland. the odd one continuing in northern ireland, northern england. but for wales, midlands, southern england it should be a dry day. plenty of sunshine here. the winds may not be quite as strong on sunday, but if anything, those temperatures could actually be a degree or so, a lower now heading into the beginning of the new week. and that low pressure heading towards scandinavia.

keep some windy weather, though, going across scotland. that weather front there continuing to feed rain into northern scotland. more showers coming in to the rest of the country. and whilst england and wales may start drying northern ireland too, we could see some showery rain moving in here from the west and that could arrive later on in the day at se w 19 for the start of wimbledon, where temperatures are going to be around 21 degrees. so, not particularly warm, start to the week ahead. it's going to take a while for those temperatures to rise. they may not rise a great deal, mind you. and it's still unsettled over the week ahead with some showers or longer spells of rain, particularly in the north and the west.

tiktok about distinctive videos although it appears they are struggling third guidelines say... the bbc flak to lose if it is doing

just that and after a day