Skip to main content

tv   The Daily Global  BBC News  July 11, 2023 7:00pm-7:30pm BST

7:00 pm
one ,one thing i would say one thing i would say is, these are - one thing i would say is, these are damaging, _ - one thing i would say is, these are damaging, these - - one thing i would say is, these are damaging, these are| these are damaging, these are clearly damaging to the bbc, it is not a good situation. at the nato summit in lithuania leaders have agreed to allow ukraine to join nato but only when a number of conditions are met. and, the beginning of a new era, scientists say we are now in a new geological time period, the anthropocene epoch. hello, welcome to the daily global, where we'll bring you the top stories from around the world. a second person has made serious allegations about the bbc presenter accused of paying a teenager for sexually explict photographs. bbc news has contacted a person in their 20s who says they first came into contact with the male presenter on a dating app and claims the presenter sent them menacing messages.
7:01 pm
our correspondent helena wilkinson is here with more details. what is here with more details. new details have emergt evening? what new details have emerged this evenin: ? . ., ., , what new details have emerged this evenin ? . ., ., , ., , evening? new allegations about this bbc presenter _ evening? new allegations about this bbc presenter important _ evening? new allegations about this bbc presenter important for - evening? new allegations about this bbc presenter important for our - bbc presenter important for our viewers to be clear, has no connection to the person of the centre of the the sun story about payments for photographs. the allegations tonight are as you mention, an individual in their early 20s, first contacted anonymously by the male presenter on anonymously by the male presenter on a dating app. they said they were put under pressure to meet up. that never happened. when the person hinted online that they might name the presenter, they'd then send abusive messages. speaking to bbc news, the person said they had been scared by their power that the presenter held. they said that the threats made in the messages frightened them and that they
7:02 pm
remained scared. we must point out that will be, the bbc news, have tried to contact the presenter directly and via his lawyer but so far have had no response to that. those are new allegations about another person to do with this bbc presenter this evening. it another person to do with this bbc presenter this evening.— presenter this evening. it has emerued presenter this evening. it has emerged that _ presenter this evening. it has emerged that a _ presenter this evening. it has emerged that a police - presenter this evening. it has emerged that a police force l presenter this evening. it has i emerged that a police force had presenter this evening. it has emerged that a police force had been contacted in april. what more do we know about this? in contacted in april. what more do we know about this?— know about this? in terms of the timeline, as _ know about this? in terms of the timeline, as we _ know about this? in terms of the timeline, as we have _ know about this? in terms of the timeline, as we have seen - know about this? in terms of the timeline, as we have seen over l know about this? in terms of the i timeline, as we have seen over the past few days, this is an incredibly complex, fast moving story. let's remind ourselves that the bbc have not told us that the parents of the young person in connection with the sun allegations, the person contacted the bbc in may. we have had confirmation this evening that a police force has said it was contacted in april, the month before, about the unnamed presenter by the parents of the young person
7:03 pm
at the centre of the allegations. reported in the sun. the force says no criminality at that point was identified, but that further inquiries are ongoing. the force also says that it has met with the met police and say that the bbc as well and as we know the metropolitan police confirming that they are carrying out inquiries and they have asked the corporation to put their investigation on pause while detectives at the metropolitan police try and establish one question. is there any evidence that any criminal offence has taken place. given the claims and counterclaims in this story, it may be tricky to get to the bottom of that. ., ~ be tricky to get to the bottom of that. . ~ , ., be tricky to get to the bottom of that. ., ~' , ., , be tricky to get to the bottom of that. . ~ ,, , . be tricky to get to the bottom of that. . ~ , ., , . ., well today the director general of the bbc, tim davie, defended the corporation's handling of the initial complaint against the presenter. the bbc was first contacted on may 18th by the family claiming their child had received money for sexually explicit photos. but the presenter was not spoken to by the corporation
7:04 pm
until last thursday. our media editor, katie razzall, reports on the latest developments. the bbc at the centre of a storm, not a good situation, the director—general said today. claim and counterclaim goes on about a bbc presenter, still unnamed, explicit photographs, and quite what the bbc did when a family complaint. in his first interview since the crisis erupted, tim davie said he had launched an internal review of bbc complaints procedure. i think there is a valid question that i am asking which is, how are complaints like this red flagged through the organisation. and i want that immediately looked at and also review the overall process and protocols to make sure we are satisfied by them. today, as it published its annual report, the bbc offered up a new timeline. the key information is about how they handled that early complaint. on the 18th of may, a family member went into a bbc
7:05 pm
building to try to complain. the next day, their complaint reached the corporate investigations team who, we are told, felt it didn't involve criminality, but was serious. on the same day, they e—mailed the family member, who didn't respond. more than two weeks later, they called the mobile given but the call didn't connect. the case was kept open. a month later, the sun contacted the bbc corporate press office with what the bbc said contained new allegations. after that, with the top executives informed, the complainant interviewed, and the presenter spoken to for the first time, action was swift. it was a difficult situation in which we were not getting a response to attempts to get more information. when the information came to me on the 6th ofjuly, i think we acted very speedily. that action included suspending the presenter. the director—general told me today he has not personally spoken to the still unnamed presenter throughout this, but tim davie
7:06 pm
is still under pressure particularly over how much effort was made to investigate that serious complaint made in may. that timeline today they have released, i have to tell you is very damning. the idea that after you get a complaint of any kind from concerned parents saying a major presenter is giving vast amounts of money and turning my child into a drug addict, whether or not it is true, you cannot know at that stage. you have to ring alarm bells like that. the bbc has now spoken publicly, �*the sun' has not. though it has pushed back on the claims by the lawyer for the young person at the heart of this that its story is rubbish and that nothing inappropriate or unlawful went on between the client and the presenter. today the sun had the family standing by their story, asking how their loved one could even afford a lawyer. the paper told us about the family is being attacked for not understanding the bbc complaints system. with the police now involved,
7:07 pm
the met has asked the bbc to pause its own investigation, but the corporation does feel damaged by the story. i think the bbc is often in the midst of quite painful and difficult affairs and storms. and i think one thing i would say is these are damaging, these are clearly damaging to the bbc. it is not a good situation. there have now been days of headlines and media attention. but no real sign that the story is reaching an end. i spoke to him and asked them how serious this is for the bbc and the presenter involved.
7:08 pm
much more serious in the last couple of hours, because as you were reporting, as helena wilkinson was telling you, we now have a second young person, a person in his or her 20s who has made a complaint. and this complaint is a complaint that bbc news has been able to investigate. what's happened is that the young person has shown the bbc messages. these came from a phone number. the bbc knows the phone number of the presenter involved or allegedly involved in this case. the bbc has been able to check the messages against the presenter�*s phone number. so through newsgathering in the traditional form, the bbc has been able to put these serious allegations to the presenter, and there's been no response so far. so that does, i think, increase the seriousness from the point of view of the presenter looking at the position of the bbc as katie razzall was telling you, i think that the director general, tim davie, is not happy with the way in which the original complaint was investigated. there was an email, there was a phone call. it was then put on hold. and he's clearly concerned enough to order an internal investigation
7:09 pm
into how allegations like this are handled in the future. and i suppose what many people find a little bit strange about this is why the presenter wasn't spoken to, apparently by the bbc for about seven weeks. i think what tim davie is saying is that the bbc, other large employers, broadcasters, get several complaints against individuals, perhaps quite regularly against people in the public eye. and it can't simply go to the individual and say, look, there's a complaint and the individual might be a profile, high—profile presenter. anybody really working for the bbc would have to say, well, i can't deal with this. this person is misguided, this person is wrong. in other words, there needs to be a filtering system. the question is whether this filtering system was good enough. if the original allegations that were reported to the bbc, to the audience response department, the people you phone up to say whether the programme was any good or not and then was handed
7:10 pm
on to the corporate investigation department. if these allegations were as serious as they were reported in the sun last week, then as you were reporting earlier, you would have thought that he was tim davie's words, red flags would have been raised and these allegations would have been investigated more seriously. if the investigators couldn't get hold of the family that was said to have complained, and they might well have thought that it was appropriate to put this to the presenter and see what response they got. joshua, for those who may not be across the story, why is it that we haven't named this presenter yet? can you explain that in terms of the legal implications? there are two reasons, two aspects of law. the first is privacy, which is a law that's been developed in the united kingdom in recent years by the courts. obviously, you don't have privacy in all circumstances, but broadly speaking, unless or until you're charged with a criminal offence, the fact that you may be under
7:11 pm
investigation is not something that can be safely reported. bbc got into trouble over this a few years ago. it's possible to sue for invasion of privacy. that's one thing. the other is defamation, libel. if you can't prove it, then you may be in serious difficulty and have to pay damages. the bbc former legal correspondent. as always more on that story on our website or on the news app if you have access to that. around the world and across the uk you are watching bbc news. let's get some of the day's other news now. a manjailed a man jailed who were found dead a manjailed who were found dead in a lorry trailer. the man has been believed to be a ringleader in a people smuggling gang responsible for the deaths. he was extradited from romania to face charges. a jury
7:12 pm
has ruled a man who killed a nine or a girl who by stabbing her in the heart as she played in the streets of boston. the girl died injuly last year as she played yards from her mother. the man charged with her murder was found unfit to enter a plea or stand trial due to mental health earlier this year. mortgage interest rates have hit the highest level for 15 years. the average cost of a two—year fixed deal is now 6.6%. the first time it has been that high since 2008 when it was a financial crisis. lenders as rates were some owners are having to find hundreds of pounds more every month. this is bbc news. you're live with bbc news. nato has confirmed that ukraine will become a full member of the alliance once conditions for that are met. speaking on the first day of a leaders' summit in lithuania, the secretary generaljens stoltenberg did not give a timetable for the process but said that kyiv�*s path to nato
7:13 pm
membership was being accelerated. earlier, president zelensky had sharply criticised the reluctance of some nato leaders to say when his country could join the military alliance. my colleague lewis vaughan jones is in vilnius. it is the really significant here. we have heard significant news of support and help launched for ukraine, but will president zelensky see it as a no. he did not get a firm commitment on the timeline for ukrainejoining nato. to let you know what is happening, the summit centre here is a little bit quiet than normal because the presidential palace is the site of the social dinner for the palace is the site of the social dinnerfor the heads palace is the site of the social dinner for the heads of state, zelensky was there. he is there right now. he was one of those
7:14 pm
invited to attend, a nice event for the world leaders up to the business of the day was taking care of. president zelensky flew in this afternoon, notjust for the dinner but also for a vermin, in another part of the capital, he spoke to ukrainians who were there in the city centre with him. take a listen now to his message. translation: today here in vilnius we have a ukrainian _ translation: today here in vilnius we have a ukrainian flag _ translation: today here in vilnius we have a ukrainian flag from - translation: today here in vilnius we have a ukrainian flag from the i we have a ukrainian flag from the battlefield in bakhmut, it will be remembered by our grandchildren. i came here today believing in the partners, believing in the strong nato, in a nato that does not doubt, and a nato that does not waste time or turn heads to any aggressor.
7:15 pm
ukraine will make nato stronger, and nato will make ukraine safer. you heard that strong message and in his view to lay his weakness. i want to the words, a quick sentence from jens stoltenberg in the offer to ukraine this is what he said... we will issue an invitation for ukraine tojoin nato where will issue an invitation for ukraine to join nato where there are less agree and conditions are met. so thatis agree and conditions are met. so that is not a blanket guarantee and a firm timeline. it is, when allies agree and conditions are met. i spoke to the latvian prime minister, to get a sense of those nato conversations in the room, as it were, and i asked him about this idea of a firmer timeline for ukraine tojoin nato. take idea of a firmer timeline for ukraine to join nato. take a idea of a firmer timeline for ukraine tojoin nato. take a listen. it is absolutely a step in the right direction, — it is absolutely a step in the right direction, is it is as fast as zelensky— direction, is it is as fast as
7:16 pm
zelensky would want? no. is it as fast as_ zelensky would want? no. is it as fast as clear as i would want? know. but what _ fast as clear as i would want? know. but what we — fast as clear as i would want? know. but what we have right now, this is extremely— but what we have right now, this is extremely important and not to diminish— extremely important and not to diminish is complete unity around the nato — diminish is complete unity around the nato tapir. primary unity, unwavering support to help ukraine when _ unwavering support to help ukraine when the _ unwavering support to help ukraine when the war today. the scenes pledges — when the war today. the scenes pledges of weapons, pledges of ammunition, pledges of money that will continue for as long as it takes — will continue for as long as it takes. everyone speaking around the table is _ takes. everyone speaking around the table is also saying that that will not change, even if the tide of war or some _ not change, even if the tide of war or some days ago goes south, that will continue. if or some days ago goes south, that will continue.— will continue. if that support will continue, will continue. if that support will continue. if _ will continue. if that support will continue, if there _ will continue. if that support will continue, if there is _ will continue. if that support will continue, if there is that - will continue. if that support will continue, if there is that unity, l continue, if there is that unity, why not offer a timetable? it continue, if there is that unity, why not offer a timetable? it seems to have never _ why not offer a timetable? it seems to have never worked _ why not offer a timetable? it seems to have never worked that _ why not offer a timetable? it seems to have never worked that way - why not offer a timetable? it seemsl to have never worked that way in the past _ to have never worked that way in the past and _ to have never worked that way in the past. and there is a war going on right— past. and there is a war going on right now — past. and there is a war going on riaht now. , past. and there is a war going on right now— right now. interesting thoughts there from _ right now. interesting thoughts there from the _ right now. interesting thoughts there from the latvian - right now. interesting thoughts there from the latvian prime i there from the latvian prime minister. he also used the word rejuvenated to describe nato. he said russia's actions have
7:17 pm
rejuvenated nato. speak now to... we're joined now by the former nato deputy supreme commander, sir richard shirreff. what you have heard from jens stoltenberg and its commitments to ukraine, do you think they go far enough? ukraine, do you think they go far enou~h? ., ukraine, do you think they go far enou~h? . , ukraine, do you think they go far enou~h? ., , ., �* , ukraine, do you think they go far enou~h? ., , .,�* , enough? know they don't but i can completely — enough? know they don't but i can completely understand _ enough? know they don't but i can completely understand both - enough? know they don't but i can completely understand both the i enough? know they don't but i can i completely understand both the nato position _ completely understand both the nato position and president zelensky's position — position and president zelensky's position. of course president zelensky— position. of course president zelensky once a firm from a clear commitment and timeline but the reality— commitment and timeline but the reality is— commitment and timeline but the reality is of course, with a timeline _ reality is of course, with a timeline is next to impossible. —— a war~ _ timeline is next to impossible. —— a war~ but _ timeline is next to impossible. —— a war~ but what — timeline is next to impossible. —— a war. but what nato will say is ukraine — war. but what nato will say is ukraine willjoin the alliance as soon _ ukraine willjoin the alliance as soon as— ukraine willjoin the alliance as soon as there is a cease fire. and we the _ soon as there is a cease fire. and we the alliance are going to do everything in our power to ensure you can't— everything in our power to ensure you can't achieve that cease—fire as quickly— you can't achieve that cease—fire as quickly as— you can't achieve that cease—fire as quickly as possible. i would also like to— quickly as possible. i would also like to hear from the alliance that they endorse 100%, president zelensky's military objectives. the
7:18 pm
reality— zelensky's military objectives. the reality is, — zelensky's military objectives. the reality is, this is a factor of life with— reality is, this is a factor of life with nato~ _ reality is, this is a factor of life with nato. they can only move at the speed _ with nato. they can only move at the speed at— with nato. they can only move at the speed at the — with nato. they can only move at the speed at the slow ship of the convoy _ speed at the slow ship of the convoy. that is the prices consensus with all— convoy. that is the prices consensus with all members having to agree. so this is— with all members having to agree. so this is a _ with all members having to agree. so this is a step — with all members having to agree. so this is a step in the latvian president said but it is not as fast and far— president said but it is not as fast and far as — president said but it is not as fast and far as it— president said but it is not as fast and far as it could go.— and far as it could go. really interesting. _ and far as it could go. really interesting. on that - and far as it could go. really interesting. on that idea i and far as it could go. really| interesting. on that idea that and far as it could go. really i interesting. on that idea that a cease—fire happens and then ukraine is in, what about the argument that is in, what about the argument that is if that were guaranteed, that could act as an incentive for putin to effectively track out this conflict for as long as possible? ads, conflict for as long as possible? a person will drag out the conflict for as— person will drag out the conflict for as long as possible, what nato says is _ for as long as possible, what nato says is neither here or there. of course _ says is neither here or there. of course he — says is neither here or there. of course he wants to drag it out because — course he wants to drag it out because of the hope that president trump _ because of the hope that president trump gets elected in 2024 as president, that is a disaster for nato _ president, that is a disaster for nato and — president, that is a disaster for nato and pretty catastrophic for ukraine — nato and pretty catastrophic for ukraine as well. what nato needs to
7:19 pm
be ukraine as well. what nato needs to he doing _ ukraine as well. what nato needs to he doing is— ukraine as well. what nato needs to be doing is sending the strongest possible — be doing is sending the strongest possible signal of strength, unity, determination post topic is that is all russia — determination post topic is that is all russia will understand. strength and being _ all russia will understand. strength and being very firm. i think as well is that, _ and being very firm. i think as well is that, ukraine, nato should be announcing that is giving ukraine not only— announcing that is giving ukraine not only what it needs to fight the offensive — not only what it needs to fight the offensive and a strategic sense, remember, what we have had is this incremental— remember, what we have had is this incremental approach, the drip, drip, _ incremental approach, the drip, drip, drip, — incremental approach, the drip, drip, drip, weapons donated to be able to— drip, drip, weapons donated to be able to have a real impact. the importance on our part, f—16s, long-range — importance on our part, f—16s, long—range cruise missiles, to allow ukraine _ long—range cruise missiles, to allow ukraine to _ long—range cruise missiles, to allow ukraine to achieve a strategic impact — ukraine to achieve a strategic impact on _ ukraine to achieve a strategic impact on russia. we ukraine to achieve a strategic impact on russia.— impact on russia. we did get announcements _ impact on russia. we did get announcements on _ impact on russia. we did get announcements on exactly i impact on russia. we did get i announcements on exactly that. we got announcements are training for pilots, announcements on long—range missiles, not significant enough for you? missiles, not significant enough for ou? ~ ., missiles, not significant enough for ou? . . ., 4' ., missiles, not significant enough for ou? ~ ., ., ~ ., , , missiles, not significant enough for ou? ., ., ~ you? what i would like to see is a strateuic you? what i would like to see is a strategic afford _ you? what i would like to see is a strategic afford -- _ you? what i would like to see is a strategic afford -- approach i you? what i would like to see is a strategic afford -- approach for i you? what i would like to see is a i strategic afford -- approach for the strategic afford —— approach for the alliance _ strategic afford —— approach for the alliance. what members are doing is supporting _ alliance. what members are doing is supporting ukraine bilaterally. that is the _ supporting ukraine bilaterally. that is the difference between the
7:20 pm
aligned — is the difference between the aligned supporting ukraine in a strategic— aligned supporting ukraine in a strategic sense. identifying a strategic sense. identifying a strategic and stained and providing the ways— strategic and stained and providing the ways and means as an alliance to provide _ the ways and means as an alliance to provide what ukraine needs. what about the individual _ provide what ukraine needs. transit about the individual spending provide what ukraine needs. hisusgt about the individual spending of individual nato members and this 2% figure, the desire to not try and make that an aspiration, but a floor, not a ceiling but a floor. does that overdo? {lari floor, not a ceiling but a floor. does that overdo?— floor, not a ceiling but a floor. does that overdo? of course it is overdue. does that overdo? of course it is overdue- ten _ does that overdo? of course it is overdue. ten years _ does that overdo? of course it is overdue. ten years ago - does that overdo? of course it is overdue. ten years ago or- does that overdo? of course it is overdue. ten years ago or nine l does that overdo? of course it is| overdue. ten years ago or nine to does that overdo? of course it is i overdue. ten years ago or nine to be precise. _ overdue. ten years ago or nine to be precise. at— overdue. ten years ago or nine to be precise, at the nato summit in wales, — precise, at the nato summit in wales, all— precise, at the nato summit in wales, all nato members promised at that stage _ wales, all nato members promised at that stage to meet 2% of gdp within ten years _ that stage to meet 2% of gdp within ten years. here we are one year to go in— ten years. here we are one year to go in only— ten years. here we are one year to go in only 11 _ ten years. here we are one year to go in only 11 have done so. let us be clear~ — go in only 11 have done so. let us be clear~ 2%, _ go in only 11 have done so. let us be clear. 2%, as others have said is the floor— be clear. 2%, as others have said is the floor not — be clear. 2%, as others have said is the floor not the ceiling. nato faces— the floor not the ceiling. nato faces a — the floor not the ceiling. nato faces a generation, if not more, of a need _ faces a generation, if not more, of a need to— faces a generation, if not more, of a need to deter russia and deterrence means having the
7:21 pm
capability, the credibility and being — capability, the credibility and being prepared to use it. that means being _ being prepared to use it. that means being ready— being prepared to use it. that means being ready for the worse case. the worst _ being ready for the worse case. the worst case, — being ready for the worse case. the worst case, i— being ready for the worse case. the worst case, i am afraid to say, is having _ worst case, i am afraid to say, is having to — worst case, i am afraid to say, is having to fight russia. the way to prevent _ having to fight russia. the way to prevent and having to avoid fighting brushes _ prevent and having to avoid fighting brushes to— prevent and having to avoid fighting brushes to be ready. that means real significant _ brushes to be ready. that means real significant increases in defence spending. much, much more than 2%. this is— spending. much, much more than 2%. this is not— spending. much, much more than 2%. this is not something to get self—congratulatory about at all. there _ self—congratulatory about at all. there is — self—congratulatory about at all. there is a — self—congratulatory about at all. there is a long way to go. self-congratulatory about at all. there is a long way to go. thank you very much, general— there is a long way to go. thank you very much, general for— there is a long way to go. thank you very much, general for coming i there is a long way to go. thank you very much, general for coming onto | very much, generalfor coming onto the programme. quickly i want to show you the media area at the summit. it is very, very quiet compared to a couple of hours ago. action will be to the presidential palace. joining me live now is our europe correspondent katya adler. some up if you can the day of the summit. how significant you think it has been? l summit. how significant you think it has been? ., summit. how significant you think it has been? ,, .,, ,., ., has been? i think the most important thin of a has been? i think the most important thing of a summit _ has been? i think the most important thing of a summit like _ has been? i think the most important thing of a summit like this _ has been? i think the most important thing of a summit like this is - has been? i think the most important thing of a summit like this is to i thing of a summit like this is to take _ thing of a summit like this is to take a— thing of a summit like this is to take a step back. and say how
7:22 pm
significant this moment in european history— significant this moment in european history is _ significant this moment in european history is. because when russia launched — history is. because when russia launched its full—scale invasion of ukraine _ launched its full—scale invasion of ukraine it — launched its full—scale invasion of ukraine it brought an enormous, large—scale conventional warfare back to _ large—scale conventional warfare back to this constant for the first time _ back to this constant for the first time since — back to this constant for the first time since the second world war. in doing _ time since the second world war. in doing so— time since the second world war. in doing so it _ time since the second world war. in doing so it actually breathed life back into — doing so it actually breathed life back into this military alliance. it is not _ back into this military alliance. it is not that— back into this military alliance. it is not that long ago that the french president— is not that long ago that the french president was declaring nato brain dead _ president was declaring nato brain dead no — president was declaring nato brain dead. no one is saying that any more — dead. no one is saying that any more. something else to bear in mind and we _ more. something else to bear in mind and we talk— more. something else to bear in mind and we talk about potential membership of nato for ukraine, is that right _ membership of nato for ukraine, is that right from the get—go, nato was very nervous and dancing a delicate ti-ht very nervous and dancing a delicate tight rope _ very nervous and dancing a delicate tight rope balance about supporting ukraine, _ tight rope balance about supporting ukraine, because it believes it is about— ukraine, because it believes it is about white or european security and russia _ about white or european security and russia must not be victorious in ukraine — russia must not be victorious in ukraine because that could whet its appetite _ ukraine because that could whet its appetite for potential further conquests, but not having this military— conquests, but not having this military alliance based off directly against _ military alliance based off directly against a — military alliance based off directly against a nuclear power that is
7:23 pm
russia — against a nuclear power that is russia. that is something that the us, for— russia. that is something that the us, for example, is bearing in mind when— us, for example, is bearing in mind when it— us, for example, is bearing in mind when it is— us, for example, is bearing in mind when it is saying, when it comes to membership, look, we need to take this slowly. — membership, look, we need to take this slowly, slowly approach with ukraine — this slowly, slowly approach with ukraine. . this slowly, slowly approach with ukraine. ,, , . , ., ukraine. seen pictures of the dinner as we were — ukraine. seen pictures of the dinner as we were just _ ukraine. seen pictures of the dinner as we were just explaining - ukraine. seen pictures of the dinner as we were just explaining that. i ukraine. seen pictures of the dinner as we were just explaining that. can j as we were just explaining that. can you mark our card for us looking ahead to tomorrow and some kind of conclusion and and any idea on what would be a successful summit on nato's a half and propped the view from russia's ballnot tomorrow received the meeting of the nato — ukraine counsel for the first time. this body is sort of a consolation present— this body is sort of a consolation present to — this body is sort of a consolation present to ukraine which has not got its clear— present to ukraine which has not got its clear timetable towards nato membership. so it is sort of being offered _ membership. so it is sort of being offered membership my nest. so it has a _ offered membership my nest. so it has a bit _ offered membership my nest. so it has a bit of— offered membership my nest. so it has a bit of a goodie back and president— has a bit of a goodie back and president zelensky knows it's a goodie — president zelensky knows it's a goodie bag and below what he would like. goodie bag and below what he would like part— goodie bag and below what he would like. part of the goodie bag is the formation— like. part of the goodie bag is the formation of a counsel which elevates _
7:24 pm
formation of a counsel which elevates ukraine's standing alongside nato. also part of the goodie — alongside nato. also part of the goodie bag is shortening the process a bit, _ goodie bag is shortening the process a bit, towards membership, once there _ a bit, towards membership, once there could — a bit, towards membership, once there could be a cease—fire in place. — there could be a cease—fire in place. for— there could be a cease—fire in place, for example. another we will hear about— place, for example. another we will hear about is the coalition of the whittling — hear about is the coalition of the whittling which would include the united _ whittling which would include the united states, germany, france, and the uk, _ united states, germany, france, and the uk, and — united states, germany, france, and the uk, and more, saying we cannot -ive the uk, and more, saying we cannot give you _ the uk, and more, saying we cannot give you membershipjust yet but the uk, and more, saying we cannot give you membership just yet but we are going _ give you membership just yet but we are going to stand by you and keep giving _ are going to stand by you and keep giving aid _ are going to stand by you and keep giving aid to. sol are going to stand by you and keep giving aid to. so i think the fact that nato— giving aid to. so i think the fact that nato still is here, behind ukraine _ that nato still is here, behind ukraine, in the face of russian aggression sending this message loud and clear— aggression sending this message loud and clear to moscow. they know putin is watching _ and clear to moscow. they know putin is watching this closely, that they would _ is watching this closely, that they would come up as a success and also sweet _ would come up as a success and also sweet in _ would come up as a success and also sweet in being given the nod from turkey— sweet in being given the nod from turkey to — sweet in being given the nod from turkey tojoin the sweet in being given the nod from turkey to join the club, nato sweet in being given the nod from turkey tojoin the club, nato is expanding _ turkey tojoin the club, nato is expanding and an area of influence russia _ expanding and an area of influence russia would not want nato would see this as _ russia would not want nato would see this as a _ russia would not want nato would see this as a success because sweden and finland _ this as a success because sweden and finland only— this as a success because sweden and finland only asked to enjoy after the invasion of ukraine. . keeping an e e the invasion of ukraine. . keeping an eye on — the invasion of ukraine. . keeping an eye on the _ the invasion of ukraine. . keeping an eye on the big _ the invasion of ukraine. . keeping an eye on the big screens - the invasion of ukraine. . keeping an eye on the big screens here i an eye on the big screens here because we are expecting that last
7:25 pm
family photo to round off day one of the summit. family photo to round off day one of the summit-— family photo to round off day one of the summit. ., ,, i. , . ~ , the summit. thank you very much. as alwa s if the summit. thank you very much. as always if you — the summit. thank you very much. as always if you want _ the summit. thank you very much. as always if you want more _ the summit. thank you very much. as always if you want more on _ the summit. thank you very much. as always if you want more on what i the summit. thank you very much. as always if you want more on what is i always if you want more on what is happening in the nato summit which of course continues and ends tomorrow, you're more than welcome tomorrow, you're more than welcome to go to our website or the bbc�*s news app. back in a couple of minutes of time so stay with us here on bbc news. good evening. the shower clouds menacing in the menai straits behind me earlier today. it has been a day of contrasts, really. the sunshine between the showers, but when they've come along, we've had some really torrential downpours, lots of thunder and lightning, some hail in there as well. a rather more persistent band of rain still across the north of scotland.
7:26 pm
the showers perhaps fading a little later this evening and overnight across england and wales, but some more persistent rain potentially pushing through northern ireland into southern scotland, again back into north wales and northern england. i think we've lost the humidity, so a more comfortable night for sleeping. but those breezes, that brisk wind will continue to push those showers eastwards overnight and into wednesday with that low pressure close by. perhaps a little respite in the south on thursday, but not for long. the next area of wet and windy weather comes in by the end of the week and then lingers into the weekend. we're set in this trend, really, at the moment of really very unsettled weather. so wednesday dawning with a little bit of sunshine, but the shower cloud soon gets going and they'll be heavy and frequent across northern ireland, scotland, northern england. and there will be showers further south as well. almost nowhere exempt from them, so when they come along, they will move through on that brisk wind coming from the west or the north—west. so it'll feel fresher, but as i say there is still the chance of some showers disrupting the play on wednesday at wimbledon, for example, because they will be coming through on that brisk
7:27 pm
breeze at times. squally winds and downpours continue into the evening. they fade a little, then, as we head towards thursday morning in southern areas. again, a pleasant night for sleeping having lost that humidity, fairly cool i should imagine in the suburbs, perhaps into single figures. but that ridge of high pressure's really only around in southern areas. still some heavy showers further north. and then this next area of low pressure pushes back in with some more persistent rain and a bout of strong winds again for friday. but for thursday, again plenty of showers, slow—moving and heavy with the slightly less windy weather in the north. perhaps fewer showers in the south, but there'll still be some around. with a bit more sunshine, temperatures will be a little higher. and then into friday, as our next area of low pressure winds itself in, it will give another spell of quite heavy and thundery rain, strong winds to go with it and following some heavy showers. and you can see it stays unsettled for the most part into the early part of next week as well.
7:28 pm
7:29 pm
this is bbc news. the way headlines. are made over the course i headlines. a second person makes allegations about the bbc presenter at the centre of claims of sexually explicit photos. it comes as the corporation says does make attempts are made over the course of several
7:30 pm
weeks to contact the family at the

30 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on