i'm helena humphrey. good to have you with us. russia's ambitions for its place on the world stage have been on full display this week: president putin has been hosting the russia—africa summit, seeking to extend his influence on the continent. 17 african leaders attended the events in st peterburg. that's sharply down from the 43 who attended in 2019. and while there has been discussions about the war in ukraine, and how to end it, the key talking point has been about grain. some african leaders are worried their population will have less access to food, after russia backed out of a crucial export deal just over a week ago. meanwhile, russia is working to strengthen ties to north korea. defence minister sergey shoigu

met kimjong—un in pyongyang. he's believed to be mr kim's first known foreign guest since the start of the covid pandemic. pictures released by state media show the north korean leader observing a large military parade — flanked by shoigu and the defence minister of china. while all this goes on, so too does russia's war on its neighbour: ukrainian authorities say missiles have struck two buildings in the centre of the eastern city of dnipro. moscow says the country's south has also come under attack. the bbc�*s vitaly shevchenko has been following the latest developments. vitaly, thank you for being with us. firstly, moscow saying that it's encountered a number of ukrainian missiles over southern russia, which it claims to have shot down. what more do we know?— claims to have shot down. what more do we know? moscow says that these _ more do we know? moscow says that these were _ more do we know? moscow says that these were two _ more do we know? moscow says| that these were two soviet-made that these were two soviet—made 5-200 that these were two soviet—made 5—200 missiles and they were intercepted over southern rostov region. later, we also

saw reports of another missile — presumably ukrainian, at least that's what russia says — actually hitting a town called taganrog, also in rostyn region. it's part —— rostov region. it's part —— rostov region. it's part of a continuing trend of ukraine apparently targeting facilities inside russia, across the border in russia. ukraine has not acknowledged responsibility, it did not say it was behind these attacks. vitaly, meanwhile, in st petersburg, we know that the russia—africa summit has been taking place. president putin telling a group of african leaders that he would study a peace proposal that they've put forward. what do you make of that? ~ ., , , that? well, i would be very surprised — that? well, i would be very surprised if _ that? well, i would be very surprised if the _ that? well, i would be very surprised if the african - surprised if the african leaders who visited the summit in st petersburg, if they had effective ways of making

vladimir putin change its mind and its plans for his so—called special military operation in ukraine. the summit in st petersburg, i think, ukraine. the summit in st petersburg, ithink, should be viewed as part of russia's global stand—off with the west, because russia's expansion of —— because expansion of russia's influence in africa comes at the expense of western influence — particularly in countries such as mali and the central african republic. when we speak about those countries, of course, we have to remember that russia's influence there is best represented by the wagner mercenary group. we've seen photographs which appear to show the leader of wagner, yevgeny prigozhin, actually attending this summit. and it's a very striking event, given that yevgeny prigozhin, about a month ago, led an armed

uprising against the top military commanders inside russia — as a result of which, a number of russian helicopters were shot down and their pilots died. and even though vladimir putin had vowed to punish the people who said —— he said were traitors of their motherland, nothing happened to yevgeny prigozhin. and, as we see, he was apparently allowed to attend this very important summit. earlier, i spoke with john tefft, former us ambassador to ukraine and then to russia, about this. ambassador, thank you so much for being with us. this week, we've seen president putin hosting african leaders. we've seen the defence minister, shoigu, heading to north korea. how successful do you think russia's attempts right now are proving, of trying to build an alternate alliance of support? i think it's still a mixed result. i've been reading the press reports coming out of

moscow around st petersburg on the summit with the african leaders, and it seems that there's, i guess, a mixed message. no.1 there's, i guess, a mixed message. no. i — there's not as many african leaders at this summit as there were at the last one. second, i was intrigued to see that many of the african leaders called on president putin to resume the grain shipments and let the ukrainian grain shipments out of the black sea area. and he's promised to allow or to give as gifts some grain to four or five african countries. but it's pretty clear that they had the african —— that the african nations had a clear message for him. cos i think this is one of the things that i've been intrigued by — whether this cut—off of the grain deal which president putin announced earlier would backfire on them. it's still too early to say for sure. but so far, i think, "mixed" is probably the best result they could hope for. there has been, at times, some

criticism from western allies — france, for example, president macron — for african nations continuing to have a relationship with russia in light of the war in ukraine. but do you think that the west is doing enough to deinnocents have countries in africa, for example, from having a relationship with moscow, particularly when you think of things like food insecurity in a number of countries? i don't know all of— a number of countries? i don't know all of the _ a number of countries? i don't know all of the diplomatic - know all of the diplomatic efforts that have been made by the biden administration or, for that matter, the european countries. i'm told that there's been a lot of effort to try to get them to take a more clear position against the russians�* invasion and war against ukraine. i read today that the african nations put forward a plan for finding some kind of an end to the fighting and a peaceful resolution. i think my own sense at this point is that president putin is still determined to press

ahead. he wants to blank the russian offensive, and he�*s counting on western societies to eventually come to a stop in their support for ukraine. i don�*t see that happening. but he�*s determined to, i think, wait out the west in terms of support in prosecuting this war. a lot, obviously, depends on how this counteroffensive that ukraine is now waging turns out. that ukraine is now waging turns out-— that ukraine is now waging turns out. , , ., turns out. interestingly on the sidelines of _ turns out. interestingly on the sidelines of that _ turns out. interestingly on the sidelines of that summit, - turns out. interestingly on the sidelines of that summit, we i sidelines of that summit, we also reportedly saw the attendance of the wagner leader, yevgeny prigozhin, at a time when supposedly he was meant to be in exile after that attempted mutiny. what did you make of that appearance, and what do you think it says about president putin�*s grip on power? i president putin's grip on ower? ~ ., , president putin's grip on ower? ~' ., , ., , power? i think it was mainly in the context — power? i think it was mainly in the context of _ power? i think it was mainly in the context of the _ power? i think it was mainly in the context of the relationship| the context of the relationship that the wagner group and prigozhin himself have had with some of the leaders. the one picture i saw had him with the

leader of the central african republic — and there�*s been wagner troops there for a long time. i think he was brought to this, orthe time. i think he was brought to this, or the meetings were held with him perhaps at a separate site, because he has heads to relationships, because he�*s the go—to guy for many of these african leaders who have brought wagner troops into their country and have cut deals with them — which also allows the russians to extract minerals and other things from the —— from africa. i saw it in that context rather than as a move to rehabilitate prigozhin. at the same time that this is going on, there are still efforts to try to bring the wagner groups into the regular army. so i don�*t think this is necessarily a signal that putin is going soft on prigozhin. you have served — is going soft on prigozhin. you have served under _ is going soft on prigozhin. you have served under both the obama and trump administrations. you�*ve witnessed russia�*s invasion of georgia. in light of what we are seeing now, what we�*ve been seeing for the past 18 months,

do you think the united states misread vladimir putin? trio. do you think the united states misread vladimir putin?- misread vladimir putin? no, i don't think— misread vladimir putin? no, i don't think the _ misread vladimir putin? no, i don't think the united - misread vladimir putin? no, i don't think the united states | don�*t think the united states misread putin. i mean, iwas the ambassador in russia from 2014 to 2017, and i got there six months after the russians had invaded crimea. so i don�*t think anybody had any illusions. to the extent that there was a surprise, it was that he decided, in 2022 in february, to go all—in and to throw 100,000 of his forces into a fight in what has clearly now evidently been a strategic miscalculation of the first order. and it�*s not only not achieved his objectives, but russia, i think, is in a difficult position. we�*ll see. it's difficult position. we�*ll see. it�*s always easier — all the military officers will tell you to be on the defensive rather than on the offensive. so there�*s a tough road ahead for there�*s a tough road ahead for the ukrainians. but at the same time, we�*re seeing inside of russia notjust the prigozhin

uprising, but we�*re seeing more and more evidence of, i think, average russians asking themselves, "what is this about? what are we actually achieving here?" then this week, we saw also the arrest of mr gherkin, one of the right—wing proponents of the war, who has been very critical initially of the military, but then even of president putin and his policies. it�*s still hard to calculate from outside given the tight wraps that the russian political leadership has on society there, but i don�*t think things are going terribly well inside of russia for putin. terribly well inside of russia for putin-— terribly well inside of russia for putin. , ., ., , for putin. john teft, the only american — for putin. john teft, the only american diplomat _ for putin. john teft, the only american diplomat to - for putin. john teft, the only american diplomat to have l for putin. john teft, the only - american diplomat to have been an ambassador to both russia and ukraine — fascinating insights. thanks for being with us. ., insights. thanks for being with us, ., ", ., insights. thanks for being with us. . ., ., now, at the summit, african leaders have called for an end to the war in ukraine, keen to see the conflict conclude to shore up their supply to grain. some put forward proposals for peace, but the kremlin says they would be "very

difficult to implement". this is what the battlefield looks like now, as kyiv pushes like now, as kyiv pushes to retake land. in a video published by president zelensky, ukrainian troops say they�*ve taken a village to the east of zaporizhzhia city. president vladimir putin also acknowledges that attacks have "significantly" intensified. earlier, i asked lieutenant colonel alexander vindman what else putin could commit to the war. he really has nothing new in terms of capabilities. but what he can rely on is kind of the brutality that he�*s experienced thus far, or he�*s leveraged thus far, or he�*s leveraged thus far, or he�*s leveraged thus far, to continue to punish the ukrainian population. the callousness with which he treats his own troops — he continued to mobilise tens of thousands of russian soldiers to put to the meat grinder. and frankly, he may very well choose, some time in the fall, when he�*s out of resources, when he�*s out of resources, when he�*s out of resources, when he�*s out of military resources, to mobilise hundreds of thousands of troops, like he did last fall. as we�*ve heard, the head

of the russian wagner group, yevgeny prigozhin, made an unexpected appearance on the sidelines of putin�*s africa summit. he�*d been keeping a low profile since leading the mutiny last month and was meant to be living in belarus. but he�*s again making headlines, having his photo taken with a delegate. prigozhin appears to have welcomed the coup that is currently taking place in west africa�*s niger. a company affiliated with the mercenaries shared an audio message purportedly from mr prigozhin. in the unverified recording, he describes the military takeover as a "fight against colonisers". wagner troops operate in several african countries, where they�*ve been accused of carrying out atrocities. let�*s bring injohn lechner, an independent researcher whose book on the wagner group comes out next year. john, the wagner boss yevgeny prigozhin, unexpectedly turned up in st petersburg, when he was meant to have cut a deal with putin

to be in exile. who needs who more right now, would you say? well, thanks for having me. i think the simple answer is, when it comes to russia�*s africa policy, the russian state needs wagner far more than wagner needs the russian state to conduct its operations in africa. specifically in the central african republic and mali most especially right now. what do you think it says that putin essentially allowed prigozhin back into the country?— prigozhin back into the count ? ~ ~ country? well, i think it essentially _ country? well, i think it essentially shows - country? well, i think it essentially shows the i country? well, i think it i essentially shows the fact country? well, i think it - essentially shows the fact that wagner is crucial to the russia—africa summit and it�*s crucial to russia�*s ability to project influence and power on the continent. and so prigozhin�*s appearance in st petersburg at this summit isn�*t surprising, because ultimately i think the russian state is in a bit of a bind

i think the russian state is in a bit ofa bind right i think the russian state is in a bit of a bind right now in that they still need wagner in order to project that influence that they want to. i order to project that influence that they want to.— that they want to. i want to net that they want to. i want to get your — that they want to. i want to get your assessment, - that they want to. i want to | get your assessment, then, that they want to. i want to - get your assessment, then, on what you think the future of wagner looks like, then. president putin, as we know, had offered wagner groups contracts with the russian military. was there any uptake on that? i military. was there any uptake on that? ., �* ~' military. was there any uptake on that? ., �* ~ ., on that? i don't think that we've seen _ on that? i don't think that we've seen much - on that? i don't think that we've seen much uptake. | on that? l don't think that| we've seen much uptake. i on that? l don't think that - we've seen much uptake. i think we�*ve seen much uptake. i think that it�*s certainly fair to say that it�*s certainly fair to say that there are a number of wagner contractors in ukraine who certainly were surprised or against what they saw in terms of the mutiny in latejune. i�*m sure that there are a number of wagnerfighters who sure that there are a number of wagner fighters who have gone home. i�*m sure that there are a number as well who have joined other volunteer battalions, as well as quite a few who are remaining loyal to prigozhin and the organisation. we�*ve seen thousands move over to belarus, as well as not any significant change in terms of numbers on the african continent, in syria, or in libya as well. i

continent, in syria, or in libya as well.— continent, in syria, or in libya as well. i 'ust wonder if ou libya as well. i 'ust wonder if you think _ libya as well. i 'ust wonder if you think that _ libya as well. i just wonder if you think that could - libya as well. i just wonder if you think that could change. | you think that could change. because, of course, as we know, wagner plays a very significant role in africa securing a number of governments. if there is potentially further turmoil/upheaval within the ranks of wagner, do you think that could spill over onto the african continent? do you think that could lead to turmoil there? i that could lead to turmoil there? ., �* ~' that could lead to turmoil there? ., �* ,, ., there? i don't think so, at this moment. _ there? i don't think so, at this moment. i— there? i don't think so, at this moment. i think - there? i don't think so, at this moment. i think what there? i don't think so, at. this moment. i think what we have to remember is that wagner�*s presence in africa is a product of the russian state�*s interesting capacity —— interest and capacity to be in these countries. so those same constraints that made the russian government turn to contractors in africa are going to essentially constrain their ability to replace wagner any time soon. and so i think one of the main reasons wagner will stay in africa is because the russian ministry of the defence does not have the capacity, the

talent or probably also the interest to invest heavily in these countries. flit interest to invest heavily in these countries.— interest to invest heavily in these countries. of course we know prigozhin _ these countries. of course we know prigozhin has _ these countries. of course we know prigozhin has played - these countries. of course we know prigozhin has played a l know prigozhin has played a huge role in information warfare as well, it is notjust on the battlefields, he has had a significant role in publishing this information, and if we take a look at what is going on in indonesia right now —— in ej right now. we have seen niger. people have been chanting and holding russian flags. do you think that information war is laying out on the continent right now? i don't think so. what we are don�*t think so. what we are seeing right now, especially in niger is more and more polarised geopolitical environment, where to be anti—french is to be pro— russian, which doesn�*t necessarily reflect one�*s views on ukraine or greater geopolitical values, but the narrowing of the discourse between the west and russia, and so i think the flags that

we see are not necessarily something that is preplanned or anything along those lines, because there are certainly quite a number of grassroots organisations and individuals who see the value in the discourse and they try to use that to further their own political ends. john lechner, thank you. great to have you with us, his book on the wagner group comes out later next year. we�*ve touched on it, but let�*s focus on the main talking point from the africa summit. leaders have renewed their appeal for russia to return to a deal that allowed grain to be shipped from ukraine�*s black sea ports. moscow recently withdrew from the agreement, which was brokered by turkey and the un, claiming the west wasn�*t keeping to its side of the bargain. african nations say it�*s essential the agreement is revived.

let�*s bring in our panel — drjoseph siegle, director of research at the africa centre for strategic studies, and asha castleberry—hernandez, former senior advisor to the assistant secretary at the state department. a warm welcome to you both, great to have you with us. i want to start with the russia— africa summit which we have seenin africa summit which we have seen in st petersburg these past couple of days. it�*s the second time it has been held, and fewer african leaders showing up this time around. what do you make of that — joseph, firstly to you? i think it is significant there were so many fewer african leaders deciding to show up, really up until the days before the summit the expectation was that there would be about the same, and it was seen as a real feather in russian�*s —— russia�*s cap, the fact that so few ultimate we decided to show up few ultimate we decided to show up i think reveals how little

many african leaders see russia has to offer right now.— has to offer right now. asher, what did you _ has to offer right now. asher, what did you make _ has to offer right now. asher, what did you make of- has to offer right now. asher, what did you make of it, - has to offer right now. asher, what did you make of it, are l what did you make of it, are you surprised to see a lower turnout this time round? —— asha. it turnout this time round? -- asha. , , , ., asha. it is very significant to note but _ asha. it is very significant to note but not _ asha. it is very significant to note but not surprising - asha. it is very significant to note but not surprising in . asha. it is very significant to i note but not surprising in some ways _ note but not surprising in some ways because of the fact that we have _ ways because of the fact that we have the grain deal problem going _ we have the grain deal problem going on. — we have the grain deal problem going on, and then there has been — going on, and then there has been some concerns with regard to russia's — been some concerns with regard to russia's involvement in ukraine _ to russia's involvement in ukraine. so i think that overtime hasjust been, overtime has just been, concerns overtime hasjust been, concerns among many african leadership, and at the end of the day, _ leadership, and at the end of the day, it is, you know, it discourage them to attend, or if attending, we must resolve this issue _ if attending, we must resolve this issue involving the grain deai~ — this issue involving the grain deal. , ., deal. exactly, you mentioned those calls — deal. exactly, you mentioned those calls that _ deal. exactly, you mentioned those calls that came - deal. exactly, you mentioned those calls that came from i deal. exactly, you mentioned. those calls that came from the summit from those leaders who did attend —1 of those calls are led by the egyptian leader, basically saying that putin must re—enter this grain deal.

putin has made other promises as we know, he has promised free grain shipments for a number of months, he has also promised debt write—offs— what is your assessment of that pledge, joseph? i is your assessment of that pledge. joseph?— is your assessment of that pledge, joseph? is your assessment of that -led~e,jose-h? ~ . pledge, joseph? i think we have to be very _ pledge, joseph? i think we have to be very sceptical _ pledge, joseph? i think we have to be very sceptical of _ pledge, joseph? i think we have to be very sceptical of those - to be very sceptical of those promises. at the last russia have african summit, putin also made a lot of promises, including that russia would double its trade with africa. in fact it has contracted since then. really, russia is using this grain deal as a political card. and we shouldn�*t forget that in addition to pulling out of the deal, russia has been bombing ukrainian ports and destroying grain. i think it is symbolic of the contempt that russia has for its partners and the global south, and global fruit prices, it is trying to

advertise this to advance —— weaponised this to advance its goals in ukraine.— goals in ukraine. asher, what do ou goals in ukraine. asher, what do you think? _ goals in ukraine. asher, what do you think? do _ goals in ukraine. asher, what do you think? do you - goals in ukraine. asher, what do you think? do you think i do you think? do you think african nations should be sceptical of these promises put forward by moscow, or should they be about their own partnerships and forging those partnerships and forging those partnerships in a complicated world? i partnerships in a complicated world? ., ~' , partnerships in a complicated world? ., ~ , , ., world? i do think they should be sceptical _ world? i do think they should be sceptical already, - world? i do think they should be sceptical already, as - world? i do think they should be sceptical already, as partl be sceptical already, as part of initial comments, is that putin will deliver 50 tons of grain, that is not enough, that is insufficient, especially with the fact that we have ishaq, who has banned exports of rights to africa, —— of rice to africa. and we have exacerbation in regard to food insecurity, hyperinflation, so i think for the most part, as far as 50 tons of grain, it is not enough, and despite what we call free grain, more needs to be delivered. we

call free grain, more needs to be delivered.— be delivered. we are talking about more _ be delivered. we are talking about more needing - be delivered. we are talking about more needing to - be delivered. we are talking about more needing to be i about more needing to be delivered, i want to ask you asha, with your experience of the state department, is there anything you think the biden administration could do which would provide more support to african nations?— african nations? already initially as _ african nations? already initially as far _ african nations? already initially as far as - african nations? already initially as far as pulling | african nations? already i initially as far as pulling out of the — initially as far as pulling out of the grain deal, the biden administration did an excellent 'ob administration did an excellent job with — administration did an excellent job with calling out that decision along with the united nations — decision along with the united nations. and then with regards to ukraine, the administration is doing — to ukraine, the administration is doing an excellentjobjust holding _ is doing an excellentjobjust holding putin five feet to the fire, — holding putin five feet to the fire, for— holding putin five feet to the fire, for instance this week resident _ fire, for instance this week resident biden did an excellent 'ob resident biden did an excellent job with — resident biden did an excellent job with opening up, willing to provide — job with opening up, willing to provide more information to the international criminal court with— international criminal court with regards to holding putin more — with regards to holding putin more accountable with regards to the — more accountable with regards to the war against humanity, war crimes against humanity. i think— war crimes against humanity. i think that _ war crimes against humanity. i think that is significant to note _ think that is significant to note because many african countries are part of the icc. so i — countries are part of the icc. so i think— countries are part of the icc. so i think the biden administration is doing an

excellent job administration is doing an excellentjob as far as administration is doing an excellent job as far as staying engaged in being able to use diplomatic tools in a way to shape — diplomatic tools in a way to shape the outcome of this and deliver— shape the outcome of this and deliver a — shape the outcome of this and deliver a strong message to african _ deliver a strong message to african countries that you know. _ african countries that you know, putin is not a reliable partner, _ know, putin is not a reliable partner, he is stilla significant problem when it comes— significant problem when it comes to ukraine, and it is already— comes to ukraine, and it is already spilling into where it is impacting food insecurity and — is impacting food insecurity and inflation in the continent. joseph, — and inflation in the continent. joseph, do you think there is any chance that these african leaders can get putin to reverse course, to change his mind? ~ ., �* ~' , mind? well, i don't think they can do so _ mind? well, i don't think they can do so directly _ mind? well, i don't think they can do so directly but - mind? well, i don't think they can do so directly but i - mind? well, i don't think they can do so directly but i do - can do so directly but i do think it is significant that at this summit that russia organised, to really advance its global posture and try to use it as a platform to show it is not isolated and to blame the west for problems that africa is facing, including

food singled out instead the narrative is exactly the opposite. it is all about what russia has done to restrict these food supplies. so i think it has been a real black i have russia in terms of its diplomatic efforts, and credit to the african leaders who kept pressing the point, and i think it is not lost on anybody that this was purely a self initiated restriction on the grain supplies, the grain deal was working fine over the past year, the un said that they had exported 32 million tons, so to cut that off just to try to advance a political and, i think has really backfired for moscow, vis—a—vis their african interlocutors. moscow, vis-a-vis their african interlocutors.— interlocutors. asha, we have about 30 _ interlocutors. asha, we have about 30 seconds _ interlocutors. asha, we have about 30 seconds left, - interlocutors. asha, we have about 30 seconds left, just l about 30 seconds left, just briefly, to what extent do you think russia�*s influence could be a destabilising force on the continent very briefly?-

continent very briefly? again, auoin continent very briefly? again, going back — continent very briefly? again, going back to _ continent very briefly? again, going back to the _ continent very briefly? again, going back to the argument i continent very briefly? again, i going back to the argument that it does— going back to the argument that it does not keep up with its promises, failing to deliver, again. — promises, failing to deliver, again. 50 _ promises, failing to deliver, again, 50 tons of grain is not enough. _ again, 50 tons of grain is not enough, sol again, 50 tons of grain is not enough, so i think we will see this play— enough, so i think we will see this play out, and they are still— this play out, and they are still going to play political football with regards to promoting the —— decolonisation, blaming the west— decolonisation, blaming the west for everything.- decolonisation, blaming the west for everything. thank you so much. _ west for everything. thank you so much, we're _ west for everything. thank you so much, we're running - west for everything. thank you so much, we're running out. west for everything. thank you so much, we're running out of| so much, we�*re running out of time, but asha and joseph, thank you so much for being with us. i�*m helena humphrey in washington. thanks for your company — and do join me at the top of the hour for more of the day�*s news. see you then. hello there. so far thisjuly looks like it�*s going to be a little bit below average for our temperatures, but a long way above average for rainfall. yes, there are some places, for example, blackpool, that have already seen 2.7 times their average july rainfall. so it�*s been a lot wetter

than normal and that pattern really has been repeated across most of the uk. now the satellite picture from friday shows this curl of cloud out towards our north—west. it�*s an area of low pressure and you can see the weather fronts spiralling into the centre of the low. now, over the next few hours, as that low continues to move closer to the north—west of the uk, so increasingly we�*ll see some heavy downpours working in, especially to northern ireland and western areas of scotland. these are the kind of temperatures you�*ll have as you start off the weekend, 14 or 15 degrees. so it is going to be quite a mild start to things on saturday. however, we will see plenty of downpours around. and as i say, the closer you are to that area of low pressure, the more likely you are to see some fairly heavy and even some fairly prolonged outbreaks of rain. that�*s especially the case for northern ireland and west scotland, but to a degree, north—west england and north—west wales will probably have a lot of showers as well. elsewhere, well, probably not that many showers across the midlands and eastern areas of england. so some dry weather and lengthy dry spells for these areas showers few and far between.

temperatures still by and large, a little below average. now for the cricket, the ashes, i suspect it will probably stay mostly dry on saturday. if you catch a shower, it will be a fleeting light one. on sunday, rain on the way but late in the day. so again, it should be a largely unaffected day for play. different story, though for monday, we are going to see low pressures working and bringing more rain. sunday�*s forecast then — we have an area of low pressure that�*s going to be pushing rain into northern ireland, wales and western areas of england should stay mainly fine to the north and east, although there will be a few showers here. temperatures continue to run a little bit below average for the time of year. on into monday and tuesday�*s forecast. well, even as one area of low pressure crosses the uk, there�*s another one brewing and developing to our west. so it�*d be nice to think as we finished the month and started a new month going into august, that we�*d see a change in the weather pattern. but no, that�*s not the case.

it stays unsettled with further showers or some lengthier spells of rain.

this is bbc news. we�*ll have the headlines and all the main news stories for you at the top of the hour, straight after this programme.

this week, we are going atomic at the european organisation for nuclear research, cern. we will look at the cutting—edge cancer treatments that are foxing the visit six. it cancer treatments that are foxing the visit six.- foxing the visit six. it does not talk — foxing the visit six. it does not talk to _ foxing the visit six. it does not talk to my _ foxing the visit six. it does not talk to my physics - foxing the visit six. it does i not talk to my physics brain. i am curious to see whether it will bring something or not. how does science become fiction? we will meet an author looking for disaster. tote fiction? we will meet an author looking for disaster.— looking for disaster. we want conflict. we _ looking for disaster. we want conflict. we want _ looking for disaster. we want conflict. we want to - looking for disaster. we want conflict. we want to see i looking for disaster. we want i conflict. we want to see things falling apart. that is the interesting thing for a fiction writer. �* ., , . , writer. and then a scientist with an experiment - writer. and then a scientist with an experiment that i writer. and then a scientist i with an experiment that could change our understanding of everything. it

change our understanding of everything-— everything. it is an unanticipated i everything. it is an l unanticipated result. everything. it is an - unanticipated result. physics and a — unanticipated result. physics and a nobel