seriously, if not sacked. since she first stepped into the job, the home secretary has had a licence to speak her own mind, but tonight suella braverman�*s job is on the line. officials in downing street say her criticisms in the times newspaper of the uk's most senior policeman had not been signed off by number10. we will get reaction from our political editor chris mason, and we will speak to a former member of the met police. also tonight, the armed wing of the palestinian islamichhad group in gaza has released a video of two israeli hostages, an elderly woman and a boy. and the white house says it has assurances from israel there will be daily humanitarian pauses to allow

civilians to escape the fighting and to let more aid in. good evening. so now we know number 10 did not sign off home secretary suella braverman�*s times article in which she criticised the commissioner of the metropolitan police for the way he has handled pro—palestinian protests. the prime minister's office suggested amendments to her draught article, but she ignored some of those proposed changes. did she defy the prime minister? downing street appear to have confirmed that that is the case. this is what she wrote. "i do not believe that these marches are merely a cry for help for gaza."

she claimed aggressive right—wing protesters were "rightly met with a stern response", while "pro—palestinian mobs were largely ignored". in an urgent question in the commons this morning, the shadow home secretary, yvette cooper, accused suella braverman of acting in "the crudest and most partisan of ways". where is the home secretary? sent the policing minister to come, to refuse to repeat her words, cos we've seen her words this morning — attempting to rip up the operational independence of the police, attacking their impartiality in the crudest and most partisan of ways, deliberately undermining respect for the police at a sensitive time when they have an importantjob to do, deliberately seeking to to create division around remembrance, which the policing minister rightly said should be a time for communities to come together and to pay our respects. and she is deliberately inflaming community tensions in the most dangerous of ways.

she is encouraging extremists on all sides, attacking the police when she should be backing them. it is highly irresponsible and dangerous, and no other home secretary would ever have done this. and therein lies one of labour's favourite lines of attack, that rishi sunak is weak. this is the ad they have released today. number 10 since they are throwing theirfull weight behind number 10 since they are throwing their full weight behind the number 10 since they are throwing theirfull weight behind the home secretary. let's talk to our political editor chris mason. good to see you. we know that in the past downing street has sort of distanced itself from suella braverman�*s comments, but at times this has seemed disingenuous. this time, the anger seems real but the question is what do they intend to

do about it. it’s question is what do they intend to do about it— do about it. it's really interesting with the prime _ do about it. it's really interesting with the prime ministers - do about it. it's really interesting with the prime ministers now- do about it. it's really interesting i with the prime ministers now does, christian. _ with the prime ministers now does, christian, on a couple of fronts. firstly, — christian, on a couple of fronts. firstly, there is that whole issue of the _ firstly, there is that whole issue of the secretary undermining the boss _ of the secretary undermining the boss. step away from the politics and the _ boss. step away from the politics and the home secretary and downing street— and the home secretary and downing street spokesman and all that kind of stuff, _ street spokesman and all that kind of stuff, put it in your own world. if you _ of stuff, put it in your own world. if you went — of stuff, put it in your own world. if you went to work at joe's to undermine the boss, then you did undermine — undermine the boss, then you did undermine the boss, then you did undermine the boss, then you publicly— undermine the boss, then you publicly humiliated the boss, would it leave _ publicly humiliated the boss, would it leave yourjob security prospects enhanced — it leave yourjob security prospects enhanced or diminished? i don't need to answer— enhanced or diminished? i don't need to answer that question. then there is the _ to answer that question. then there is the separate issue, connected though. — is the separate issue, connected though, which is the whole thing around _ though, which is the whole thing around what she said in this article. _ around what she said in this article, the language in this article _ article, the language in this article. now is he resetting a couple — article. now is he resetting a couple of— article. now is he resetting a couple of minutes ago, the home secretary— couple of minutes ago, the home secretary has been licensed to say stuff the _ secretary has been licensed to say stuff the other ministers did not want _ stuff the other ministers did not want to— stuff the other ministers did not want to say or would never say. how do we _ want to say or would never say. how do we know — want to say or would never say. how do we know that? well, she is still in the _ do we know that? well, she is still in the job, —

do we know that? well, she is still in the job, that licence has existed _ in the job, that licence has existed. and up to the point, if expressed _ existed. and up to the point, if expressed with not too much frequency, every couple of months or whatever, _ frequency, every couple of months or whatever, probably useful to rishi sunak— whatever, probably useful to rishi sunak because she tends to speak in language _ sunak because she tends to speak in language that some order people will be cover— language that some order people will be cover with and use themselves rather— be cover with and use themselves rather than — be cover with and use themselves rather than highfalutin political language, and also in a language that a _ language, and also in a language that a sizeable chunk of conservative backbenchers would like and regard _ conservative backbenchers would like and regard thing that would resonate with then _ and regard thing that would resonate with them. but when you start saying stuff that _ with them. but when you start saying stuff that leaves your colleagues 'aws stuff that leaves your colleagues jaws on — stuff that leaves your colleagues jaws on the carpet several times a fortnight, — jaws on the carpet several times a fortnight, it gets a bit more tricky if you're _ fortnight, it gets a bit more tricky if you're in— fortnight, it gets a bit more tricky if you're in downing street. and it certainly— if you're in downing street. and it certainly does if some of that is stuff— certainly does if some of that is stuff you — certainly does if some of that is stuff you exquisitely were asked not to say, _ stuff you exquisitely were asked not to say, and — stuff you exquisitely were asked not to say, and you said anyway.- to say, and you said anyway. yeah, as he rightly _ to say, and you said anyway. yeah, as he rightly say. — to say, and you said anyway. yeah, as he rightly say, the previous - as he rightly say, the previous example of that was when she talked about banning home of people from using tents on the street and now this. there is some speculation in the conservative media them in fact she wants to be set because she's

never made any real secret of her leadership aspirations. can you talk to us about the politics behind that? why was she not want to be in the cabinet and what does the prime minister had to take into consideration in mind of that? yeah, i think it's consideration in mind of that? yeah, i think it's worth — consideration in mind of that? yeah, | think it's worth it _ consideration in mind of that? yeah, i think it's worth it sort _ consideration in mind of that? yeah, i think it's worth it sort of _ consideration in mind of that? yeah, i think it's worth it sort of not - i think it's worth it sort of not taking those kind of bits of interpretation to literally. so, let's — interpretation to literally. so, let's be — interpretation to literally. so, let's be clear, dust suella braverman when they have aspirations to lead _ braverman when they have aspirations to lead the _ braverman when they have aspirations to lead the conservative party? answer. — to lead the conservative party? answer, yes, herambitions are real, but she _ answer, yes, herambitions are real, but she helped also holding right now one — but she helped also holding right now one of the great offices of state _ now one of the great offices of state as — now one of the great offices of state as a _ now one of the great offices of state as a home secretary. as you nright— state as a home secretary. as you might aspire to be the conservative leader— might aspire to be the conservative leader come in what circumstances were _ leader come in what circumstances were that — leader come in what circumstances were that potentially come about? he would _ were that potentially come about? he would come about if the conservatives lost a general election— conservatives lost a general election because they were to win the general election which at the moment— the general election which at the moment seems unlikely, but if they were, _ moment seems unlikely, but if they were, rishi — moment seems unlikely, but if they were, rishi sunak we carry on as prime _ were, rishi sunak we carry on as prime minister. so in a world with the conservatives lose the election,

is that— the conservatives lose the election, is that she — the conservatives lose the election, is that she likely to be the next conservative leader? quite possibly, but then— conservative leader? quite possibly, but then he — conservative leader? quite possibly, but then he wore the conservative mps from — but then he wore the conservative mps from who the short list of two they were — mps from who the short list of two they were then chosen by the ownership of the party, who are those _ ownership of the party, who are those mps? it rather depends on what the election result looks like so in other— the election result looks like so in other words there is a lot of creditability about all of that and i’i l ht creditability about all of that and right now — creditability about all of that and right now suella braverman occupies one of— right now suella braverman occupies one of the _ right now suella braverman occupies one of the crownjewels right now suella braverman occupies one of the crown jewels of politics. so, one of the crown jewels of politics. so. yeah. — one of the crown jewels of politics. so, yeah, sure, she has those longer—term ambitions but to what extent— longer—term ambitions but to what extent what you want to throw away a brilliant _ extent what you want to throw away a brilliant job _ extent what you want to throw away a brilliantjob now extent what you want to throw away a brilliant job now for the extent what you want to throw away a brilliantjob now for the prospect of a job— brilliantjob now for the prospect of a job that you might well say is not quite — of a job that you might well say is not quite as good, leading the opposition, often seen as one of the toughest _ opposition, often seen as one of the toughest and most unforgiving and thankless— toughest and most unforgiving and thanklessjobs in british politics, and it's— thanklessjobs in british politics, and it's only the prospect of that because — and it's only the prospect of that because there is no guarantee it would _ because there is no guarantee it would happen. sol because there is no guarantee it would happen. so i think we should in the _ would happen. so i think we should in the first— would happen. so i think we should in the first instance make the obvious— in the first instance make the obvious point, why is suella braverman saying a lot of this stuff? — braverman saying a lot of this stuff? because she believes it. it's what _ stuff? because she believes it. it's

what she _ stuff? because she believes it. it's what she thinks is an authentic articulation of her particular brand of conservatism. now if it helps burnish — of conservatism. now if it helps burnish the prospects of a job that she aspires to in the future as well, — she aspires to in the future as well, then— she aspires to in the future as well, then if you are her, you know, all well, _ well, then if you are her, you know, all well, that's a perfectly sort of good _ all well, that's a perfectly sort of good coincidence of two things. sol think— good coincidence of two things. sol think we _ good coincidence of two things. sol think we should, you know, i don't know, _ think we should, you know, i don't know. as _ think we should, you know, i don't know. as we — think we should, you know, i don't know, as we analyse what her motivations are, don't overlook the obvious _ motivations are, don't overlook the obvious. , , ., ., motivations are, don't overlook the obvious. , ., ., ., , , . motivations are, don't overlook the obvious. , ., ., ., ,, . ., obvious. just one other aspect of the prime _ obvious. just one other aspect of the prime minister's _ obvious. just one other aspect of. the prime minister's consideration, obviously he would want to avoid looking weak. maybe, we don't know, he has considered sacking her as home secretary given as you said that she has undermined his position. the one thing that will be in his mind is when it comes to the next election, immigration is one of the key issues. and he has to show the key issues. and he has to show the base that he is prepared to be tough on illegal migration, and he knows that suella braverman's

sometimes provocative comments on rwanda, on boats, on tents on the streets jibes with a base, chris. she is important in that sense. absolutely. a couple of things to nrention— absolutely. a couple of things to mention here, christian. one is to remember— mention here, christian. one is to remember how it suella braverman became _ remember how it suella braverman became home secretary under rishi sunak? _ became home secretary under rishi sunak? she backed him at the last minute _ sunak? she backed him at the last minute when it will he could potentially face a challenge from boris _ potentially face a challenge from boris johnson to potentially face a challenge from borisjohnson to become conservative leader— borisjohnson to become conservative leader and _ borisjohnson to become conservative leader and prime ministers and there was a _ leader and prime ministers and there was a loyalty that it was reported with her— was a loyalty that it was reported with her being appointed home secretary. absolutely her language and instincts on some of the key issues _ and instincts on some of the key issues amongst conservative mps and long—standing conservative voters are ones _ long—standing conservative voters are ones that suella braverman could often articulate and articulate rather — often articulate and articulate rather italy. want me to everyone's taste. _ rather italy. want me to everyone's taste. but _ rather italy. want me to everyone's taste. but it— rather italy. want me to everyone's taste, but it is to the tastes of some — taste, but it is to the tastes of some it— taste, but it is to the tastes of some. if you are rishi sunak, would rather have — some. if you are rishi sunak, would rather have the view articulated authentically from the top table or noisily— authentically from the top table or noisily from the back benches? egually— noisily from the back benches? equally what matters massively to

rishi sunak his conduct and being decent. _ rishi sunak his conduct and being decent, being perceived to be decent and acting _ decent, being perceived to be decent and acting in a decent way. and i suspect— and acting in a decent way. and i suspect the — and acting in a decent way. and i suspect the whole business of the article _ suspect the whole business of the article that had thing sticking out of it which— article that had thing sticking out of it which then turns up in the tintes— of it which then turns up in the times with _ of it which then turns up in the times with stuff still back in it will have — times with stuff still back in it will have really, really hurt. he will have really, really hurt. he will have, — will have really, really hurt. he will have, i_ will have really, really hurt. he will have, i suspect, hated that, and i_ will have, i suspect, hated that, and i think— will have, i suspect, hated that, and i think he saw an articulation of that— and i think he saw an articulation of that in— and i think he saw an articulation of that in the relation of words from _ of that in the relation of words from the — of that in the relation of words from the prime minister's official spokesman. so if you are rishi sunak. — spokesman. so if you are rishi sunak. is— spokesman. so if you are rishi sunak, is there an easy solution out of all— sunak, is there an easy solution out of all of— sunak, is there an easy solution out of all of this? no.— of all of this? no. laughter. chris mason, _ of all of this? no. laughter. chris mason, that _ of all of this? no. laughter. chris mason, that he - of all of this? no. laughter. chris mason, that he very - of all of this? no. laughter. | chris mason, that he very much of all of this? no. laughter. - chris mason, that he very much for talking to us, good to hear from you on that. this row revolves mainly around a pro—palestinian protest that is taking place on saturday, when the uk will stop to remember the war dead. each year on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, veterans will gather at the cenotaph in london for a minute's silence.

these pictures are from remembrance sunday last year. now, to be clear, the pro—palestine march is later in the day and doesn't come near the cenotaph. but the prime minister has said he would feel more comfortable if the protest was banned on saturday. a former conservative leader, iain duncan smith, today begged mark rowley to think again. with us tonight peter kirkham who was a former senior investigating officer with metropolitan police. good happy with us, peter. can we address the main allegation that suella braverman posits in this article, that there is an attitude when giving the green light to protest that tends to err towards those on the left and there is a harder attitude to those taken on the right? that you have any grounds for a complaint? i the right? that you have any grounds for a complaint?— for a complaint? i don't think so. the metropolitan _ for a complaint? i don't think so. the metropolitan police - for a complaint? i don't think so. the metropolitan police and - for a complaint? i don't think so. i the metropolitan police and forces generally— the metropolitan police and forces generally in — the metropolitan police and forces generally in this _ the metropolitan police and forces generally in this country _ the metropolitan police and forces generally in this country are - generally in this country are evenhanded _ generally in this country are evenhanded with _ generally in this country are evenhanded with their- generally in this country are evenhanded with their use i generally in this country arel evenhanded with their use of generally in this country are - evenhanded with their use of their

powers. _ evenhanded with their use of their powers. and — evenhanded with their use of their powers. and the _ evenhanded with their use of their powers, and the terms— evenhanded with their use of their powers, and the terms and - evenhanded with their use of their. powers, and the terms and conditions of any— powers, and the terms and conditions of any marches — powers, and the terms and conditions of any marches in— powers, and the terms and conditions of any marches in public— powers, and the terms and conditions of any marches in public assemblies l of any marches in public assemblies and other— of any marches in public assemblies and other events _ of any marches in public assemblies and other events such _ of any marches in public assemblies and other events such like, - of any marches in public assemblies and other events such like, they - of any marches in public assemblies and other events such like, they do| and other events such like, they do not so _ and other events such like, they do not so far— and other events such like, they do not so far as — and other events such like, they do not so far as i — and other events such like, they do not so far as i can— and other events such like, they do not so far as i can see _ and other events such like, they do not so far as i can see leaned - not so far as i can see leaned towards — not so far as i can see leaned towards one _ not so far as i can see leaned towards one side _ not so far as i can see leaned towards one side or- not so far as i can see leaned towards one side or another. | not so far as i can see leaned i towards one side or another. if you want _ towards one side or another. if you want to— towards one side or another. if you want to have — towards one side or another. if you want to have a _ towards one side or another. if you want to have a march, _ towards one side or another. if you want to have a march, if _ towards one side or another. if you want to have a march, if you - towards one side or another. if you want to have a march, if you want. towards one side or another. if you. want to have a march, if you want to have _ want to have a march, if you want to have an _ want to have a march, if you want to have an assembly, _ want to have a march, if you want to have an assembly, you _ want to have a march, if you want to have an assembly, you can - want to have a march, if you want to have an assembly, you can make - have an assembly, you can make application — have an assembly, you can make application to _ have an assembly, you can make application to the _ have an assembly, you can make application to the police. - have an assembly, you can make l application to the police. hopefully you will— application to the police. hopefully you will liaise — application to the police. hopefully you will liaise with _ application to the police. hopefully you will liaise with the _ application to the police. hopefully you will liaise with the police - application to the police. hopefully you will liaise with the police in - you will liaise with the police in advance, — you will liaise with the police in advance, you _ you will liaise with the police in advance, you work— you will liaise with the police in advance, you work with - you will liaise with the police in advance, you work with them l you will liaise with the police in| advance, you work with them to ensure — advance, you work with them to ensure that _ advance, you work with them to ensure that you _ advance, you work with them to ensure that you get _ advance, you work with them to ensure that you get your - advance, you work with them to ensure that you get your point i ensure that you get your point across — ensure that you get your point across in— ensure that you get your point across in a _ ensure that you get your point across in a lawful— ensure that you get your point across in a lawful way, - ensure that you get your point across in a lawful way, maybe| across in a lawful way, maybe angrily. — across in a lawful way, maybe angrily. but— across in a lawful way, maybe angrily. but get _ across in a lawful way, maybe angrily, but get your- across in a lawful way, maybe angrily, but get your point - across in a lawful way, maybe . angrily, but get your point across in a lawful— angrily, but get your point across in a lawful way— angrily, but get your point across in a lawful way and _ angrily, but get your point across in a lawful way and it _ angrily, but get your point across in a lawful way and it minimizes i angrily, but get your point across i in a lawful way and it minimizes the impact _ in a lawful way and it minimizes the impact on _ in a lawful way and it minimizes the impact on other— in a lawful way and it minimizes the impact on other londoners. - in a lawful way and it minimizes the . impact on other londoners. obviously any procession. — impact on other londoners. obviously any procession. any— impact on other londoners. obviously any procession, any assembly- impact on other londoners. obviously any procession, any assembly is - any procession, any assembly is going _ any procession, any assembly is going to — any procession, any assembly is going to have _ any procession, any assembly is going to have some _ any procession, any assembly is going to have some that- any procession, any assembly is going to have some that are - any procession, any assembly is - going to have some that are mental impact _ going to have some that are mental impact on _ going to have some that are mental impact on the — going to have some that are mental impact on the lives _ going to have some that are mental impact on the lives of _ going to have some that are mental impact on the lives of those - going to have some that are mental impact on the lives of those around | impact on the lives of those around it where _ impact on the lives of those around it where it — impact on the lives of those around it where it happens _ impact on the lives of those around it where it happens but _ impact on the lives of those around it where it happens but that - it where it happens but that needs to be _ it where it happens but that needs to be kept— it where it happens but that needs to be kept to — it where it happens but that needs to be kept to a _ it where it happens but that needs to be kept to a minimum. - it where it happens but that needs to be kept to a minimum. i- it where it happens but that needs to be kept to a minimum. i think. it where it happens but that needs . to be kept to a minimum. i think the metropolitan police _ to be kept to a minimum. i think the metropolitan police are _ to be kept to a minimum. i think the metropolitan police are probably - metropolitan police are probably world _ metropolitan police are probably world leaders _ metropolitan police are probably world leaders in— metropolitan police are probably world leaders in achieving - metropolitan police are probably world leaders in achieving that. i metropolitan police are probably i world leaders in achieving that. she does not _ world leaders in achieving that. she does not have — world leaders in achieving that. she does not have any— world leaders in achieving that. she does not have any grounds - world leaders in achieving that. she i does not have any grounds whatsoever for these _ does not have any grounds whatsoever for these allegations. _ does not have any grounds whatsoever for these allegations. i— does not have any grounds whatsoever for these allegations. i did _ does not have any grounds whatsoever for these allegations. i did not - for these allegations. i did not think— for these allegations. i did not think we — for these allegations. i did not think we can _ for these allegations. i did not think we can get _ for these allegations. i did not think we can get a _ for these allegations. i did not think we can get a worse - for these allegations. i did notl think we can get a worse suella braverman _ think we can get a worse suella braverman than _ think we can get a worse suella braverman than theresa - think we can get a worse suella braverman than theresa may. i think we can get a worse suella - braverman than theresa may. suella braverman _ braverman than theresa may. suella braverman has — braverman than theresa may. suella braverman has proven— braverman than theresa may. suella braverman has proven me _ braverman than theresa may. suella

braverman has proven me wrong. i braverman than theresa may. suellaj braverman has proven me wrong. do braverman has proven me wrong. d): you braverman has proven me wrong. you think what she has written in the times could implement situation further on saturday, bring out people who are intent on violence? definitely. absolutely definitely, and not — definitely. absolutely definitely, and notjust_ definitely. absolutely definitely, and not just what _ definitely. absolutely definitely, and not just what she _ definitely. absolutely definitely, and not just what she has - definitely. absolutely definitely, | and not just what she has written definitely. absolutely definitely, i and notjust what she has written in the times— and notjust what she has written in the times article. _ and notjust what she has written in the times article. the _ and notjust what she has written in the times article. the things - and notjust what she has written in the times article. the things she i and notjust what she has written in the times article. the things she is| the times article. the things she is a saying _ the times article. the things she is a saying of— the times article. the things she is a saying of the _ the times article. the things she is a saying of the last _ the times article. the things she is a saying of the last week— the times article. the things she is a saying of the last week or - a saying of the last week or two, the language _ a saying of the last week or two, the language she _ a saying of the last week or two, the language she is _ a saying of the last week or two, the language she is been - a saying of the last week or two, the language she is been using, i a saying of the last week or two, i the language she is been using, the choice _ the language she is been using, the choice of— the language she is been using, the choice of words, _ the language she is been using, the choice of words, the _ the language she is been using, the choice of words, the choice - the language she is been using, the choice of words, the choice of- choice of words, the choice of phrase. — choice of words, the choice of phrase. the _ choice of words, the choice of phrase, the echoes— choice of words, the choice of phrase, the echoes that - choice of words, the choice of phrase, the echoes that she i choice of words, the choice of. phrase, the echoes that she has deliberately— phrase, the echoes that she has deliberately thrown— phrase, the echoes that she has deliberately thrown in _ phrase, the echoes that she has deliberately thrown in there, . phrase, the echoes that she has. deliberately thrown in there, they are all— deliberately thrown in there, they are all adding _ deliberately thrown in there, they are all adding to— deliberately thrown in there, they are all adding to the _ deliberately thrown in there, they are all adding to the tensions - deliberately thrown in there, they are all adding to the tensions at l deliberately thrown in there, they are all adding to the tensions at a time _ are all adding to the tensions at a time when — are all adding to the tensions at a time when it— are all adding to the tensions at a time when it is— are all adding to the tensions at a time when it is not— are all adding to the tensions at a time when it is not helpful- are all adding to the tensions at a time when it is not helpful to- are all adding to the tensions at a time when it is not helpful to add| time when it is not helpful to add to the _ time when it is not helpful to add to the tensions. _ time when it is not helpful to add to the tensions. i— time when it is not helpful to add to the tensions. i failed - time when it is not helpful to add to the tensions. i failed to - to the tensions. i failed to understand _ to the tensions. i failed to understand why— to the tensions. i failed to understand why a - to the tensions. i failed to understand why a home l to the tensions. i failed to - understand why a home secretary intent _ understand why a home secretary intent on — understand why a home secretary intent on doing _ understand why a home secretary intent on doing her— understand why a home secretary intent on doing herjob _ understand why a home secretary intent on doing herjob would - understand why a home secretary intent on doing herjob would use| intent on doing herjob would use this language _ intent on doing herjob would use this language and _ intent on doing herjob would use this language and would - intent on doing herjob would use this language and would do - intent on doing herjob would usej this language and would do these things i— this language and would do these things l home _ this language and would do these things. i home secretary- this language and would do these things. i home secretary seekingj things. i home secretary seeking another— things. i home secretary seeking anotherjob— things. i home secretary seeking anotherjob maybe, _ things. i home secretary seeking anotherjob maybe, and - things. i home secretary seeking anotherjob maybe, and a - things. i home secretary seeking anotherjob maybe, and a homel anotherjob maybe, and a home secretary— anotherjob maybe, and a home secretary who _ anotherjob maybe, and a home secretary who thinks _ anotherjob maybe, and a home secretary who thinks that - anotherjob maybe, and a home secretary who thinks that there i anotherjob maybe, and a home. secretary who thinks that there is anotherjob maybe, and a home i secretary who thinks that there is a huge _ secretary who thinks that there is a huge groundswell_ secretary who thinks that there is a huge groundswell behind _ secretary who thinks that there is a huge groundswell behind her- secretary who thinks that there is a huge groundswell behind her of- secretary who thinks that there is a . huge groundswell behind her of these further— huge groundswell behind her of these further write — huge groundswell behind her of these further write opinions— huge groundswell behind her of these further write opinions within - huge groundswell behind her of these further write opinions within the - further write opinions within the tory— further write opinions within the tory party. _ further write opinions within the tory party. which _ further write opinions within the tory party, which even - further write opinions within the tory party, which even the - further write opinions within the - tory party, which even the grown—up members _

tory party, which even the grown—up members of— tory party, which even the grown—up members of the _ tory party, which even the grown—up members of the tory _ tory party, which even the grown—up members of the tory party _ tory party, which even the grown—up members of the tory party sort - tory party, which even the grown—up members of the tory party sort of i members of the tory party sort of hold their— members of the tory party sort of hold their noses _ members of the tory party sort of hold their noses when _ members of the tory party sort of hold their noses when they - members of the tory party sort of hold their noses when they are i hold their noses when they are referring — hold their noses when they are referring to _ hold their noses when they are referring to them, _ hold their noses when they are referring to them, but - hold their noses when they are referring to them, but even . hold their noses when they are i referring to them, but even they hold their noses when they are - referring to them, but even they are not happy _ referring to them, but even they are not happy with — referring to them, but even they are not happy with what _ referring to them, but even they are not happy with what is _ referring to them, but even they are not happy with what is going - referring to them, but even they are not happy with what is going on - not happy with what is going on here _ not happy with what is going on here the — not happy with what is going on here. the culture _ not happy with what is going on here. the culture wars, - not happy with what is going on here. the culture wars, the - not happy with what is going on i here. the culture wars, the woke, and all— here. the culture wars, the woke, and all the — here. the culture wars, the woke, and all the rest _ here. the culture wars, the woke, and all the rest of— here. the culture wars, the woke, and all the rest of it, _ here. the culture wars, the woke, and all the rest of it, it's - here. the culture wars, the woke, and all the rest of it, it's a - and all the rest of it, it's a confection, _ and all the rest of it, it's a confection, a _ and all the rest of it, it's a confection, a confection . and all the rest of it, it's a i confection, a confection put and all the rest of it, it's a - confection, a confection put up presumably— confection, a confection put up presumably for— confection, a confection put up presumably for political - confection, a confection put up presumably for political gain. i | presumably for political gain. i cannot— presumably for political gain. i cannot see _ presumably for political gain. i cannot see any _ presumably for political gain. i cannot see any other- presumably for political gain. i cannot see any other reason i presumably for political gain. i . cannot see any other reason why presumably for political gain. i - cannot see any other reason why he would _ cannot see any other reason why he would be _ cannot see any other reason why he would be there. _ cannot see any other reason why he would be there, and _ cannot see any other reason why he would be there, and she _ cannot see any other reason why he would be there, and she seems - cannot see any other reason why he would be there, and she seems to. would be there, and she seems to think— would be there, and she seems to think that — would be there, and she seems to think that she _ would be there, and she seems to think that she can _ would be there, and she seems to think that she can be _ would be there, and she seems to think that she can be the - think that she can be the standard—bearer - think that she can be the standard—bearer of- think that she can be the | standard—bearer of those think that she can be the - standard—bearer of those that think that she can be the _ standard—bearer of those that would espouse _ standard—bearer of those that would espouse those — standard—bearer of those that would espouse those views. _ standard—bearer of those that would espouse those views. in _ standard-bearer of those that would espouse those views.— espouse those views. in her role, and her role _ espouse those views. in her role, and her role as — espouse those views. in her role, and her role as home _ espouse those views. in her role, and her role as home secretary, l espouse those views. in her role, i and her role as home secretary, she does not obviously have the power to decide policing arrangements day—to—day, norshould decide policing arrangements day—to—day, nor should she does have the power to tell the commissioner that she has no confidence in him. now in this article, she is pretty much expressing that, and i wonder what you think market rally will make of that and what position that puts him in. should he think about resigning? it

puts him in. should he think about resiuunin ? ., ., , ., resigning? it will no doubt have crossed his _ resigning? it will no doubt have crossed his mind. _ resigning? it will no doubt have crossed his mind. i _ resigning? it will no doubt have crossed his mind. i suspected l resigning? it will no doubt havel crossed his mind. i suspected he resigning? it will no doubt have - crossed his mind. i suspected he was minded _ crossed his mind. i suspected he was minded to _ crossed his mind. i suspected he was minded to resign. _ crossed his mind. i suspected he was minded to resign, he _ crossed his mind. i suspected he was minded to resign, he will— crossed his mind. i suspected he was minded to resign, he will think- crossed his mind. i suspected he was minded to resign, he will think i'm i minded to resign, he will think i'm not going — minded to resign, he will think i'm not going to — minded to resign, he will think i'm not going to do _ minded to resign, he will think i'm not going to do it— minded to resign, he will think i'm not going to do it today, _ minded to resign, he will think i'm not going to do it today, two - minded to resign, he will think i'm not going to do it today, two daysl not going to do it today, two days before _ not going to do it today, two days before this — not going to do it today, two days before this weekend, _ not going to do it today, two days before this weekend, i _ not going to do it today, two days before this weekend, i will - not going to do it today, two days before this weekend, i will leavel not going to do it today, two daysl before this weekend, i will leave it until monday _ before this weekend, i will leave it until monday. and _ before this weekend, i will leave it until monday. and whatever- before this weekend, i will leave it. until monday. and whatever happens, i will until monday. and whatever happens, i will make _ until monday. and whatever happens, i will make that — until monday. and whatever happens, i will make that decision _ until monday. and whatever happens, i will make that decision then. - i will make that decision then. because — i will make that decision then. because to _ i will make that decision then. because to exit _ i will make that decision then. because to exit stage - i will make that decision then. because to exit stage left - i will make that decision then. because to exit stage left at l i will make that decision then. . because to exit stage left at this point. _ because to exit stage left at this point. no — because to exit stage left at this point, no matter— because to exit stage left at this point, no matter how _ because to exit stage left at this| point, no matter how honourable because to exit stage left at this - point, no matter how honourable that might be _ point, no matter how honourable that might be the — point, no matter how honourable that might be the right _ point, no matter how honourable that might be the right thing _ point, no matter how honourable that might be the right thing to— point, no matter how honourable that might be the right thing to do, - might be the right thing to do, would — might be the right thing to do, would not _ might be the right thing to do, would not be _ might be the right thing to do, would not be helpful— might be the right thing to do, would not be helpful for- might be the right thing to do, would not be helpful for my. might be the right thing to do, - would not be helpful for my policing perspective — would not be helpful for my policing perspective in— would not be helpful for my policing perspective. in the _ would not be helpful for my policing perspective. in the last _ would not be helpful for my policing perspective. in the last thing - would not be helpful for my policing perspective. in the last thing this i perspective. in the last thing this weekend — perspective. in the last thing this weekend needs— perspective. in the last thing this weekend needs is— perspective. in the last thing this weekend needs is something - perspective. in the last thing this| weekend needs is something else that's— weekend needs is something else that's not— weekend needs is something else that's not helpful— weekend needs is something else that's not helpful it— weekend needs is something else that's not helpful it needs - weekend needs is something else that's not helpful it needs a - weekend needs is something else that's not helpful it needs a little| that's not helpful it needs a little bit of— that's not helpful it needs a little bit of common _ that's not helpful it needs a little bit of common sense _ that's not helpful it needs a little bit of common sense and - that's not helpful it needs a little i bit of common sense and continuity and stability. — bit of common sense and continuity and stability, and _ bit of common sense and continuity and stability, and i— bit of common sense and continuity and stability, and i suspect - bit of common sense and continuity and stability, and i suspect he - and stability, and i suspect he would — and stability, and i suspect he would have _ and stability, and i suspect he would have thought _ and stability, and i suspect he would have thought that - and stability, and i suspect he would have thought that him i and stability, and i suspect he - would have thought that him leaving would _ would have thought that him leaving would not _ would have thought that him leaving would not provide _ would have thought that him leaving would not provide that. _ would have thought that him leaving would not provide that. but- would have thought that him leaving would not provide that.— would not provide that. but in that reasonin: , would not provide that. but in that reasoning, peter, _ would not provide that. but in that reasoning, peter, he— would not provide that. but in that reasoning, peter, he must- would not provide that. but in that reasoning, peter, he must have i reasoning, peter, he must have thought given that he has evidently taken the decision the buck stops with him at the end of the day, he has taken the decision to protest can go ahead, if there is violence, it's on him.

can go ahead, if there is violence, it's on him-— can go ahead, if there is violence, it's on him. absolutely. and police officers from _ it's on him. absolutely. and police officers from the _ it's on him. absolutely. and police officers from the newest _ it's on him. absolutely. and policej officers from the newest constable on their— officers from the newest constable on their first — officers from the newest constable on their first day _ officers from the newest constable on their first day on _ officers from the newest constable on their first day on the _ officers from the newest constable on their first day on the beat - on their first day on the beat rapidly— on their first day on the beat rapidly learn _ on their first day on the beat rapidly learn that— on their first day on the beat rapidly learn that almost - on their first day on the beat - rapidly learn that almost everything they do. _ rapidly learn that almost everything they do. if— rapidly learn that almost everything they do. if it — rapidly learn that almost everything they do. if it goes _ rapidly learn that almost everything they do, if it goes right— rapidly learn that almost everything they do, if it goes right or- rapidly learn that almost everything they do, if it goes right or goes - they do, if it goes right or goes wrong. — they do, if it goes right or goes wrong. it's— they do, if it goes right or goes wrong, it's down _ they do, if it goes right or goes wrong, it's down to _ they do, if it goes right or goes wrong, it's down to you. - they do, if it goes right or goes wrong, it's down to you. if- they do, if it goes right or goes wrong, it's down to you. if it i they do, if it goes right or goes i wrong, it's down to you. if it goes right. _ wrong, it's down to you. if it goes right. you will— wrong, it's down to you. if it goes right, you will be _ wrong, it's down to you. if it goes right, you will be tripled - wrong, it's down to you. if it goes right, you will be tripled by - wrong, it's down to you. if it goes right, you will be tripled by the i right, you will be tripled by the people — right, you will be tripled by the people trying _ right, you will be tripled by the people trying to _ right, you will be tripled by the people trying to claim - right, you will be tripled by the people trying to claim credit i right, you will be tripled by the | people trying to claim credit for it, people trying to claim credit for it. your— people trying to claim credit for it, your bosses _ people trying to claim credit for it, your bosses as _ people trying to claim credit for it, your bosses as supervisors l people trying to claim credit for. it, your bosses as supervisors and such— it, your bosses as supervisors and such like~ — it, your bosses as supervisors and such like if— it, your bosses as supervisors and such like if you _ it, your bosses as supervisors and such like. if you goes _ it, your bosses as supervisors and such like. if you goes wrong, - it, your bosses as supervisors and such like. if you goes wrong, it's i it, your bosses as supervisors and | such like. if you goes wrong, it's a very— such like. if you goes wrong, it's a very lonely— such like. if you goes wrong, it's a very lonely place. _ such like. if you goes wrong, it's a very lonely place, but _ such like. if you goes wrong, it's a very lonely place, but all- such like. if you goes wrong, it's a very lonely place, but all police i very lonely place, but all police officers — very lonely place, but all police officers from _ very lonely place, but all police officers from day _ very lonely place, but all police officers from day one _ very lonely place, but all police officers from day one on - very lonely place, but all police officers from day one on the i very lonely place, but all policei officers from day one on the ps constables, _ officers from day one on the ps constables, shows _ officers from day one on the ps constables, shows my- officers from day one on the ps constables, shows my agent. officers from day one on the ps - constables, shows my agent there, on the beat. _ constables, shows my agent there, on the heat. but. — constables, shows my agent there, on the heat. but. you _ constables, shows my agent there, on the beat, but, you know, _ constables, shows my agent there, on the beat, but, you know, from - constables, shows my agent there, on the beat, but, you know, from day- the beat, but, you know, from day one they— the beat, but, you know, from day one they know— the beat, but, you know, from day one they know it's _ the beat, but, you know, from day one they know it's on _ the beat, but, you know, from day one they know it's on them - the beat, but, you know, from day one they know it's on them was of| the beat, but, you know, from day. one they know it's on them was of an mark_ one they know it's on them was of an mark rowley— one they know it's on them was of an mark rowley is an _ one they know it's on them was of an mark rowley is an intelligent - one they know it's on them was of an mark rowley is an intelligent man. . mark rowley is an intelligent man. he knows— mark rowley is an intelligent man. he knows what— mark rowley is an intelligent man. he knows what he _ mark rowley is an intelligent man. he knows what he is— mark rowley is an intelligent man. he knows what he is doing. - mark rowley is an intelligent man. he knows what he is doing. he's . mark rowley is an intelligent man. he knows what he is doing. he's in mark rowley is an intelligent man. i he knows what he is doing. he's in a perfectly— he knows what he is doing. he's in a perfectly good — he knows what he is doing. he's in a perfectly good job _ he knows what he is doing. he's in a perfectly good job so _ he knows what he is doing. he's in a perfectly good job so far— he knows what he is doing. he's in a perfectly good job so far as - he knows what he is doing. he's in a perfectly good job so far as i can - perfectly good job so far as i can from _ perfectly good job so far as i can from the — perfectly good job so far as i can from the intelligence _ perfectly good job so far as i can from the intelligence and - from the intelligence and information— from the intelligence and information this - from the intelligence and information this out - from the intelligence and information this out in i from the intelligence and | information this out in the from the intelligence and - information this out in the public domain. — information this out in the public domain. the _ information this out in the public domain, the grounds _ information this out in the public domain, the grounds are - information this out in the public domain, the grounds are simplyi information this out in the public i domain, the grounds are simply not there _ domain, the grounds are simply not there to _ domain, the grounds are simply not there to men— domain, the grounds are simply not there to man this _ domain, the grounds are simply not there to man this march _ domain, the grounds are simply not there to man this march or- domain, the grounds are simply not there to man this march or two - domain, the grounds are simply not there to man this march or two puti there to man this march or two put huge _ there to man this march or two put huge numbers— there to man this march or two put huge numbers of— there to man this march or two put huge numbers of additional- huge numbers of additional conditions _ huge numbers of additional conditions on _ huge numbers of additional conditions on it. _ huge numbers of additional conditions on it. there - huge numbers of additional conditions on it. there is. huge numbers of additional conditions on it. there is al conditions on it. there is a principle _ conditions on it. there is a principle in _ conditions on it. there is a principle in law— conditions on it. there is a principle in law in- conditions on it. there is a principle in law in this - conditions on it. there is a - principle in law in this country, and it's— principle in law in this country, and it's wett— principle in law in this country, and it's well known _ principle in law in this country, and it's well known to - principle in law in this country, and it's well known to police i and it's well known to police

officers _ and it's well known to police officers around _ and it's well known to police officers around breach - and it's well known to police officers around breach of- and it's well known to police | officers around breach of the and it's well known to police - officers around breach of the piece. if you _ officers around breach of the piece. ifyou got _ officers around breach of the piece. if you got somebody— officers around breach of the piece. if you got somebody that's - officers around breach of the piece. if you got somebody that's in - officers around breach of the piece. if you got somebody that's in the l if you got somebody that's in the street— if you got somebody that's in the street exercising _ if you got somebody that's in the street exercising their— if you got somebody that's in the street exercising their freedom l if you got somebody that's in the | street exercising their freedom of speech as — street exercising their freedom of speech as an_ street exercising their freedom of speech as an individual, - street exercising their freedom of speech as an individual, but - street exercising their freedom of| speech as an individual, but saying things— speech as an individual, but saying things that — speech as an individual, but saying things that are _ speech as an individual, but saying things that are not _ speech as an individual, but saying things that are not popular- speech as an individual, but saying things that are not popular and - speech as an individual, but saying things that are not popular and is i things that are not popular and is therefore — things that are not popular and is therefore finding _ things that are not popular and is therefore finding themselves - therefore finding themselves confronted _ therefore finding themselves confronted by _ therefore finding themselves confronted by people - therefore finding themselves confronted by people who . therefore finding themselves. confronted by people who give therefore finding themselves - confronted by people who give them a bit of a _ confronted by people who give them a bit of a kicking. — confronted by people who give them a bit of a kicking, then— confronted by people who give them a bit of a kicking, then even— confronted by people who give them a bit of a kicking, then even though - bit of a kicking, then even though it might _ bit of a kicking, then even though it might be — bit of a kicking, then even though it might be easier— bit of a kicking, then even though it might be easier to— bit of a kicking, then even though it might be easier to put- bit of a kicking, then even though it might be easier to put that - it might be easier to put that person in— it might be easier to put that person in the _ it might be easier to put that person in the back _ it might be easier to put that person in the back of - it might be easier to put that person in the back of the van it might be easier to put that - person in the back of the van and take _ person in the back of the van and take them — person in the back of the van and take them away— person in the back of the van and take them away to _ person in the back of the van and take them away to prevent - person in the back of the van and take them away to prevent it - person in the back of the van and take them away to prevent it all. take them away to prevent it all kicking — take them away to prevent it all kicking off, _ take them away to prevent it all kicking off, the _ take them away to prevent it all kicking off, the police _ take them away to prevent it all kicking off, the police officer's i kicking off, the police officer's duty— kicking off, the police officer's duty is— kicking off, the police officer's duty is not _ kicking off, the police officer's duty is not that. _ kicking off, the police officer's duty is not that. it _ kicking off, the police officer's duty is not that. it is- kicking off, the police officer's duty is not that. it is to - kicking off, the police officer's duty is not that. it is to deal. kicking off, the police officer's . duty is not that. it is to deal with the people — duty is not that. it is to deal with the peopte that _ duty is not that. it is to deal with the people that are _ duty is not that. it is to deal with the people that are offering - the people that are offering viotence. _ the people that are offering violence, and _ the people that are offering violence, and so _ the people that are offering violence, and so you - the people that are offeringi violence, and so you cannot the people that are offering - violence, and so you cannot apply that same — violence, and so you cannot apply that same principle _ violence, and so you cannot apply that same principle to _ violence, and so you cannot apply| that same principle to processions and things— that same principle to processions and things and _ that same principle to processions and things and say— that same principle to processions and things and say this _ that same principle to processions and things and say this march - that same principle to processions and things and say this march will| and things and say this march will be lawful. — and things and say this march will be lawful, perfectly— and things and say this march will be lawful, perfectly lawful, - and things and say this march will be lawful, perfectly lawful, but. and things and say this march will| be lawful, perfectly lawful, but we are going — be lawful, perfectly lawful, but we are going to— be lawful, perfectly lawful, but we are going to tran— be lawful, perfectly lawful, but we are going to ban it _ be lawful, perfectly lawful, but we are going to ban it because - are going to ban it because some other— are going to ban it because some other idiots — are going to ban it because some other idiots might— are going to ban it because some other idiots might kick— are going to ban it because some other idiots might kick off. - are going to ban it because some other idiots might kick off. in- are going to ban it because some other idiots might kick off. in thei other idiots might kick off. in the home _ other idiots might kick off. in the home secretary's _ other idiots might kick off. in the home secretary's words. - other idiots might kick off. in the home secretary's words. we - other idiots might kick off. in the i home secretary's words. we should not do _ home secretary's words. we should not do that — home secretary's words. we should not do that-— not do that. peter coming to talk to ou can not do that. peter coming to talk to you can much _ not do that. peter coming to talk to you can much for— not do that. peter coming to talk to you can much for giving _ you can much for giving your thoughts on that policing row. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. let's look at some other

stories making news. a 33—year—old man has been found guilty of murdering schoolteacher ashling murphy in ireland last year. the central criminal court in dublin found jozef puska fatally assaulted ms murphy while she was exercising on a canal path in tullamore. puska was found guilty following three weeks of evidence. the nhs waiting list in england has hit a record high as new figures show that more than a million patients are on more than one waiting list. the overall waiting list hit a new high of 7.7 million at the end of september. the overall waiting list is at its highest point since records began in august 2007. a 14—year—old boy has appeared in court charged with murder in leeds after a teenager was fatally stabbed near a school in the city. the 15—year—old alfie lewis was stabbed near st margaret's primary school in horsforth on tuesday. the former student later died in hospital. the charged boy was remanded in custody.

you're live with bbc news. the islamichhad group in gaza has released pictures tonight of israeli hostages who have not been seen since october 7th. the footage shows a woman in her 70s and a 13—year—old boy. the group says it is prepared to release both hostages for humanitarian and medical reasons, but only if what it calls "appropriate measures" are met. but heavy fighting is continuing in the ruins of gaza city between israeli forces and homes, and there are growing concerns about the conflict spreading wider in the region bringing in countries like yemen. 0ur international editor jeremy bowen has filed this report from israel. more palestinians walked down salah al—din street, the main route to southern gaza, after israel said they would not be attacked if they moved out of the northern battle zone. pauses in israeli combat operations were welcomed by the us as a significant first step.

with civilians once again digging for survivors in southern gaza, no—one is calling it a ceasefire. this was in khan younis, part of the area israel has ordered civilians to get to. nowhere in gaza is safe. some places may be less dangerous. two of the gaza hostages were in new videos, made presumably under duress. hanna katsir and yagil yaakov blamed benjamin netanyahu, israel's prime minister, for their plight. the danger of the war spreading remains. in the last three weeks or so, the houthi regime in yemen has been posting videos of attacks on israel with missiles and drones, so far all intercepted by american and israeli air defence systems over the red sea. mohammed ali al—houthi, de facto leader of the houthi regime, gave the bbc a remote interview from the capital sana'a.

he said islam legitimised attacks on israel, which he called "the entity". do you think the war here in gaza and israel can spread elsewhere in the region? translation: if the americans and the british and the french l continue backing this entity or to participate in the war alongside this entity, this would be a normal response and result of the american and european attacks and movements. there are people who say that you're attacking israel because iran told you to. translation: we in yemen en'oy freedom and democracy more b than the british people are given these days, jeremy. the british people these days are unable to express themselves freely. the secretary of state, ie home secretary, is calling to stop all demonstrations that back palestine. where is the freedom and the democracy that you enjoy in britain?

not a straight answer. what is certain is more tension and death in the west bank, the other side of the occupied palestinian territories. 15 palestinians were killed as armed groups fought israeli raids. events in gaza are having dire consequences here and across the middle east. jeremy bowen, bbc news, israel. just two days ago, we had yagil yacob�*s mother ranana here in the studio. let me play you a part of the interview. gives you an insight into just what these families are going through. the last thing i heard my youngest boy saying to me on the phone a month ago — that was my last call from him — he was begging for them not to take him. he said, "i'm too young, you can't take me. please don't take me. i'm too young." and they took him. and as i said, they're not missing. they were kidnapped from their home.

we have 32 children who were kidnapped. we sort of collected the children from the lists and made our own group and decided to initiate a visit and to approach anyone who can help us get the children released immediately. you know, we just say kids are out of the game. they shouldn't be waiting for a deal. they shouldn't be... and we're here on this private initiation. we came here to meet with qatar's ambassador in the uk, hoping he will enlist to the effort. and he's very obligated. he's given us the impression that qatar's doing whatever they can to help, and i do believe him.

renata jacob, whose son is currently being held by islam and jihad in gaza. joining us from tel aviv, carrie keller—lynn, political correspondent at the times of israel. the reaction to the government is quite _ the reaction to the government is quite similar to other videos reteased _ quite similar to other videos released specifically by hamas which is this— released specifically by hamas which is this is— released specifically by hamas which is this is psychological warfare. that— is this is psychological warfare. that is— is this is psychological warfare. that is what the idf's chiefs with horses— that is what the idf's chiefs with horses at— that is what the idf's chiefs with horses at about two hours ago. there clearl is horses at about two hours ago. there clearly is in — horses at about two hours ago. there clearly is in the background _ horses at about two hours ago. it” clearly is in the background some negotiation in qatar going on over these hostages was that the americans think that a humanitarian pause might facilitate the release of some of them most of are you hearing any more about that and whether the israelis we prepared to get that a go?— get that a go? well, the chief of the israeli _ get that a go? well, the chief of the israeli and _ get that a go? well, the chief of the israeli and american - the israeli and american intelligence organisations were in doha _ intelligence organisations were in doha today for negotiations was of they returned without any reported progress _ they returned without any reported progress i— they returned without any reported progress. i think you touched on something — progress. i think you touched on something really critical to this discussion, which is the difference in the _ discussion, which is the difference

in the american and the israeli philosophies, if you would come reteasing — philosophies, if you would come releasing the hostages was of over 239 of— releasing the hostages was of over 239 of which are still confirmed to be in _ 239 of which are still confirmed to be in gaza — 239 of which are still confirmed to be in gaza. the american perspective is that— be in gaza. the american perspective is that perhaps humanitarian pauses would _ is that perhaps humanitarian pauses would aid _ is that perhaps humanitarian pauses would aid in the release of hostages and in _ would aid in the release of hostages and in fact— would aid in the release of hostages and in fact there still talks about reteasing — and in fact there still talks about releasing 15 for a three—day pause. let me _ releasing 15 for a three—day pause. let me we — releasing 15 for a three—day pause. let me we are just going to say goodbye to our world viewers. but do pick that up, carry, because our british viewers are still with us so pick up where you left off there. {lit pick up where you left off there. of course, is a critical to station because _ course, is a critical to station because the perspective in israel is what witt— because the perspective in israel is what will force releasing hostages is military pressure so totally different views. the americans think that humanitarian pauses will facilitate perhaps even a piecemeal dripping _ facilitate perhaps even a piecemeal dripping out of hostage releases and of course _ dripping out of hostage releases and of course the israelis say we want all hostages released and that's our condition— all hostages released and that's our condition for a cease—fire and they will maintain military pressure untit— will maintain military pressure until that _ will maintain military pressure until that happens. can will maintain military pressure until that happens.— will maintain military pressure until that happens. can you talk to me about the _ until that happens. can you talk to me about the other _ until that happens. can you talk to me about the other operation has| me about the other operation has been ongoing today in the west bank?

we are told that ten were killed in a raid injenin city full so what was that about? a raid in jenin city full so what was that about?— a raid in jenin city full so what was that about? the west also has hotbeds of terrorism, _ was that about? the west also has hotbeds of terrorism, specifically l hotbeds of terrorism, specifically of hamas — hotbeds of terrorism, specifically of hamas. israel has been conducting rates throughout this month—long operation — rates throughout this month—long operation with the attentive not opening — operation with the attentive not opening a second front in the west bank _ opening a second front in the west bank to _ opening a second front in the west bank. to some extent, that's been successful— bank. to some extent, that's been successful so far. israel has seen several— successful so far. israel has seen several lone wolf terror attacks, inctuding — several lone wolf terror attacks, including one yesterday i believe. but we _ including one yesterday i believe. but we have not seen a full explosion of a front like we have been _ explosion of a front like we have been seeing in gaza and light threatens to happen... is been seeing in gaza and light threatens to happen... is there any concerns with _ threatens to happen... is there any concerns with the _ threatens to happen... is there any concerns with the war _ threatens to happen... is there any concerns with the war cabinet - threatens to happen... is there any concerns with the war cabinet to i concerns with the war cabinet to some of the settlor violence and we've also seen in the west bank is in danger of employment situation further? because if the west bank was to explode as well, israel would be fighting on three fronts. absolutely. that is a concern and i

think— absolutely. that is a concern and i think it's _ absolutely. that is a concern and i think it's a — absolutely. that is a concern and i think it's a concern that the government in israel itself recognises as not fully addressed and that— recognises as not fully addressed and that would be vigilante settler viotence _ and that would be vigilante settler violence against palestinians. kind of effort _ violence against palestinians. kind of effortjust violence against palestinians. kind of effort just mentioned, violence against palestinians. kind of effortjust mentioned, there is also tone — of effortjust mentioned, there is also lone wolf palestinian violence against _ also lone wolf palestinian violence against is — also lone wolf palestinian violence against is release and this is sort of a situation, a dynamic we have seen _ of a situation, a dynamic we have seen but — of a situation, a dynamic we have seen but with most of the focus in gaza, _ seen but with most of the focus in gaza, it _ seen but with most of the focus in gaza, it is — seen but with most of the focus in gaza, it is true that israel has not been _ gaza, it is true that israel has not been doing — gaza, it is true that israel has not been doing enough including with the us to squash the settler violence that's— us to squash the settler violence that's actually an issue we will have _ that's actually an issue we will have to — that's actually an issue we will have to keep an eye on. a that's actually an issue we will have to keep an eye on. a quick one chemically — have to keep an eye on. a quick one chemically pressure _ have to keep an eye on. a quick one chemically pressure coming - have to keep an eye on. a quick one chemically pressure coming from i have to keep an eye on. a quick one| chemically pressure coming from the white house for the humanitarian pauses of is the government in israel feeling that and do you think it's bound to some of that pressure today? i it's bound to some of that pressure toda ? ~ it's bound to some of that pressure toda ? ,, .. ., , it's bound to some of that pressure toda ? ,, .. . , ., today? i think actually what the white house — today? i think actually what the white house announced - today? i think actually what the white house announced today, | today? i think actually what the - white house announced today, which is starting _ white house announced today, which is starting tomorrow a four hour daily humanitarian pause, is actually— daily humanitarian pause, is actuallyjust a continuation of an existing — actuallyjust a continuation of an existing policy. so since sunday, israel— existing policy. so since sunday, israel has — existing policy. so since sunday, israel has held daily for our humanitarian corridors to let gazans evacuate _ humanitarian corridors to let gazans evacuate the northern gaza strip

toward _ evacuate the northern gaza strip toward a — evacuate the northern gaza strip toward a relatively south for seven over the _ toward a relatively south for seven over the past two days, the idea of 100,000 _ over the past two days, the idea of 100,000 gazans use the ability to do so. 100,000 gazans use the ability to do so but— 100,000 gazans use the ability to do so. but what is being proposed now is continuing the unitarian core but however— is continuing the unitarian core but however in — is continuing the unitarian core but however in different locations, and asked _ however in different locations, and asked about three hours ahead of time _ asked about three hours ahead of time before each window opens such as to not _ time before each window opens such as to not give hamas a chance to not -ive as to not give hamas a chance to not give hamas— as to not give hamas a chance to not give hamas a — as to not give hamas a chance to not give hamas a chance of the advantage of that— give hamas a chance of the advantage of that as _ give hamas a chance of the advantage of that as well because there is some intelligence on the israeli side now— some intelligence on the israeli side now that hamas fighters are using _ side now that hamas fighters are using those core doors and taking advantage — using those core doors and taking advantage of them with their fighters _ advantage of them with their fighters moving to the south of the strip _ fighters moving to the south of the stri -. . ~ fighters moving to the south of the stri. . ~' ,, fighters moving to the south of the stri. . ~' , fighters moving to the south of the stri. . , . strip. thank you very much indeed for that and _ strip. thank you very much indeed for that and we _ strip. thank you very much indeed for that and we will— strip. thank you very much indeed for that and we will of— strip. thank you very much indeed for that and we will of course - strip. thank you very much indeed | for that and we will of course get a reaction in the next half hour from the palestinian side as we speak to someone from the west about what went on today. you were watching bbc news. this is the context.

hello, i'm christian fraser. you're watching the context on bbc news. in our regular weekly feature — ai decoded — we'll be looking at the potential dangers of so—called deep—fake technology. could ai misinformation swing upcoming elections in america and the uk? sport, and for a full round—up from the bbc

sport centre, here's hugh. hello from the bbc sport centre. the father of liverpool forward luis diaz has been released by the colombian guerilla group that kidnapped him 13 days ago. luis manuel diaz had been held by members of the national liberation army since being abducted in his home town of barrancas. our correspondent natalie pirks reports. after 13 long days, finally, the images his family were praying for. luis manuel diaz being checked by medics and then walked from a helicopter to walk home after a team, including those from the catholic church, had met with the gorilla group holding him to negotiate his relief. it was almost two weeks ago that luis diaz's parents were kidnapped at gunpoint in a petrol station in baron cass in north—west colombia. his mother was rescued that night, but is father was abducted. police and military

had focused