hello, i'm rajini vaidyanathan. you're watching the context on bbc news. the uk insists its nuclear deterrent is viable after the second trident missile test failure in a row. time for a full round—up from the bbc sport centre. hello from the bbc sport centre. less than 2a hours after completing the deal to buy a 27.7% stake in manchester united, sirjim ratcliffe has sat down with the bbc to discuss fullfilling his boyhood dream to be involved in united and the building of a new stadium that will serve the north of england. dan roan has this exclusive with

the new manchester united co owner. but there will be worries from fans that the glazer's remain in overall control, and the nature of this co—ownership. what is the assurance that it will in practice, work? the key to it working is the relationship we will have withjoe which is in my view a very good relationship and trusting relationship. and you know, i can't give people assurances or guarantees about the future but my personal view is that there is a good level of trust and it will work. what's your latest thinking about old trafford and its future, and the state that it's in? it's a bit tired, frankly, and it's in need of refurbishment. and... you know, there are two main issues in this club,

performance on the field and the other one is probably is the stadium, and you hear talk about that. there is a kind of big argument in my view for regeneration that whole south side of manchester. and within it, the centre, a new stadium which would be a world—class state—of—the—art stadium, which could take england games, it could take the fa cups final, it could take that champions league final, and it can service the north of england. it sounds like your preference, sirjim, is for a new stadium if it can be achieved. if it can be achieved, that would clearly be my priority. i would be very excited for that prospect for for that prospect. league leaders liverpool trying to give themselves more breathing room. one point ahead of pep guardiola's site and hosts luton at anfield. they have just come out after the

break after half—time, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, certainly against the run of play from the first half with gluten tower with the season in the prime league table is difficult. with courtesy of the judge, giving the administers the advantage after 12 minutes. two types in the champions league of 16 first leg. orto two types in the champions league of 16 first leg. or to hosting arsenal just over half an hour on the clock and it is still 0—0 between the two sides meanwhile syria winners napoli welcoming barcelona to naples again around 32 minutes on the clock. it is also scoreless there. it's been confirmed that manager, thomas tuchel, will leave bayern munich at the end of the season. he's going a year earlier than planned as part of "a sporting realignment" at the club. he led bayern to last season's bundesliga title, but they're currently eight points behind leaders bayer leverkusen after back to back league defeats. one of those was an emphatic 3 0 loss to leverkusen whose manager

xabi alonso is one of the leading candidates to replace tuchel. and there's some good news for england ahead of the fourth test against india, which starts on friday. captain, ben stokes, could bowl as long as he recovers well after today's net session. the all rounder hasn't bowled in a match since last summer and had an operation on his knee in november. i think there is definitely a chance, he not confirmed it yet. they are going to see how he is doing tomorrow, see how he goes. if that's good then hopefully you can see a ball on the other side of the game. and that's all the sport for now. now to ukraine where at least 60 russian troops have been killed after a training area in the occupied eastern region was hit by two missiles. sources have told the bbc forces had been gathered for the arrival

of a senior commander. it comes as this week marks the second anniversary of russia's full—scale invasion of ukraine. this map shows ukraine right before the invasion where crimea in red has been annexed by russia. and parts of eastern ukraine in yellow were under the control of russian separatist groups. fast forward to today, and we can see russias advancement in eastern ukraine. including the recent capture of avdiivka, after some of the fiercest fighting of the war. neither country releases their total death tolls, but there have been heavy losses on both sides. now we go live to hanna shelest who is the editor in chief of ukraine analytica. welcome back to bbc news. first of all, we are talking about two years since that conflict began, what would you sum up the status of the conflict at the moment?—

conflict at the moment? firstly, i would like _ conflict at the moment? firstly, i would like to _ conflict at the moment? firstly, i would like to clarify _ conflict at the moment? firstly, i would like to clarify a _ conflict at the moment? firstly, i would like to clarify a little - conflict at the moment? firstly, i would like to clarify a little bit, i would like to clarify a little bit, it has been two years since the full—fledged war but it is the tenth anniversary of the russian invasion of ukraine and the conflict itself exactly also on february 2014 when russian forces start at the occupation of crimea annexation and the provocation in donbas so not just two years for ukrainians and that brings us to quite an understanding that unfortunately this war is not so short and easy. not only three days to conquer keith, but in general this conflict is much more serious. —— kyiv. just to show all of the things that we knew for centuries. at the same time just in the last two months, it has been quite difficult because ukraine has not received all of those promised ammunitions and that gave russians a certain advantage. it also it is demonstrated that russians do not care how many soldiers they have killed, whether

in avdiivka, just to show some certain success and get the small town of 1000 people just before the presidential elections to demonstrate victory and success. let's talk about that because there has been a lot of discussion in western capitals about funding to ukraine. we have seen discussions in the us house of representatives and of course, in the eu as well. how essential is it that ukraine gets more funding for its military hardware and other weapons? it is not the hardware and other weapons? it 3 not the question of hardware and other weapons? it 1 not the question of the funding, it is of the delivery of the nu mission. especially those that have been promised. so if you would imagine in the beginning of the war when something had been announced a certain type of ammunition is for ukraine, that should take up to one week and what would happen, the ammunition would be at the battlefield. now we have an announcement made a year ago and the weapon still have not been here in

ukraine. so when we hear all of the nice pictures of all of the different international leaders saying that we pledge this, we announce this, this, this, the next question is when it will be in ukraine and when can we really have it in ukraine. so to expect it certain changes at the battlefield evenif certain changes at the battlefield even if it is only promise without the delivery is very difficult. at this differently crucial because just one number for you, this differently crucial because just one numberfor you, ukraine spent per day, the amount france produces per month of ammunition. that is still five times less then what russians are using. considering for example the european union promised 1 million of the shells to ukraine, they still provided only 60% of what they have promised. at the same time, north korea provided 1 million shells to the russian federation and just today we had news about 400 ballistic missiles from iran to russia. that looks quite ridiculous when these

countries under the sanctions can deliver that large amount of ammunition to the aggressor and the holds democratic well—developed worlds, the g7, cannot deliver even the smallest and easiest ammunition that they have already promised. let me just ask you this, we talk a lot about ukraine's summer offensive. many assessors saying that, despite naval losses in the black sea, russia did manage to blunt that counter offensive. where do you see things going in the next year had? firstly, we definitely should divide the front line into the four fronts. the situation has been very different there. there are three land front lines, there are, unfortunately ukrainian counteroffensive was not that successful as expected. the reason being we hoped to start in spring, but the ammunition that had been promised arrived only in the summer. that allowed russia three months to

build a very good level of defence with the minefields in trenches. so we would not be able to move quickly there, you need to remove that the mines and huge territories. the first stage of warfare that is the black sea. that is where ukraine had success. here you could see all of those attacks on russian ships, the russian navy headquarters, russians ships needed to move from crimea. that is it towards the russian territories and with aeroplanes they have lost seven jets in the last week over the black sea. that is a demonstration that at least on the one front line, we are advancing. we are not allowing them to control this, allow ukraine to open ports and implement the grain deal without russia. so with these delivery of export of the greens. so the next will be the defence of the elections on and on the delivery of

ammunition.— on and on the delivery of ammunition. ., ~ , ., , . ammunition. thank you very much, hannah. around the world and across the uk this is bbc news. just two years ago there were 34 and a half thousand once the fourth—largest colony in the world. but in 12 months, virtually wiped out more than half of the population. and gannets are not alone. black headed goals registered to before blurred flu emerged in 2021 and numbers have declined by 77% in recent years. and in its first—ever report, trying to quantify the effects of bird flu, it has been said other birds have seen a catastrophic drop of 40%. we has been said other birds have seen a catastrophic drop of 40%.- a catastrophic drop of 40%. we are really concerned _ a catastrophic drop of 40%. we are really concerned and _ a catastrophic drop of 40%. we are really concerned and we _ a catastrophic drop of 40%. we are really concerned and we don't - a catastrophic drop of 40%. we are | really concerned and we don't know what the future holds. these seabirds are long—lived and they only have one or two chicks a year.

it could be another decade before we truly know what the impact of this is, even if it were to stop today. for more stories from across the uk, had to— for more stories from across the uk, had to the _ for more stories from across the uk, had to the bbc— for more stories from across the uk, had to the bbc news _ for more stories from across the uk, had to the bbc news website. - you're live with bbc news. it is the uk's weapon of last resort the ultimate deterrent. but, for the second time in a row a test firing of an unarmed trident missile has failed. it was supposed to have flown several thousand miles instead dropped into the ocean close to the launch site. the ministry of defence insists the trident nuclear weapons system which is part of britain's nuclear deterrent is still effective. here's our defence correspondentjonathan beale. it's britain's weapon of last resort. the nuclear missiles carried on these royal navy submarines meant to deter any aggressor.

trident is the us—made ballistic missile on board, and this is what is supposed to happen. but in the most recent test, it didn't get this far, itjust plopped into the ocean. and it's now the uk's second test fire fail. this test actually took place injanuary, but only now have details been revealed. the missile was launched from britain's hms vanguard off the coast of florida. it was supposed to fly about 3,700 miles and land harmlessly in the sea off west africa. instead, the unarmed test missile hit the water close to the launch site. so, what do we know about the missile itself? its us manufacturer says it has a range of more than 4,500 miles and can carry multiple nuclear warheads, each of which can be directed towards different targets. there have been 191 successful test launches, most carried out by the us, just a dozen by the uk. and the last two of those uk

tests have gone wrong. of course, when the launch is announced in advance and the defence secretary is on board, it doesn't look good. and of course, it's not good, i think, for the morale of the crew, which now goes on patrol, and morale across the submarine service, you know, to have this kind of scrutiny. malfunctions like this one in the �*80s, the early days of trident, are relatively rare. but in 2016, another uk test missile also veered off course. its last successful test was in 2012. the mod still insists the system is safe, secure, and effective. the defence secretary, who was himself on board vanguard to prove it, was watching these kinds of drills before the missile plummeted prematurely. now grant shapps is trying to reassure.

he admitted an anomaly did occur, but it was event specific and there were no implications for the reliability of the wider trident missile system. he also insisted it did not affect the uk's ability to fire its nuclear weapons. this latest malfunction won't change policy. labour, too, is committed to trident. but for the public, it might raise doubts, and britain's adversaries will have also taken note. jonathan beale, bbc news. now we go live to rear admiral dr chris parry who is a former nato commander and retired royal navy officer. welcome to bbc news. i will ask you this, how wearing is this test failure? i this, how wearing is this test failure? ., �* ~' this, how wearing is this test failure? ., �* ~ , failure? i don't think people need to worry at _ failure? i don't think people need to worry at all- — failure? i don't think people need to worry at all. but _ failure? i don't think people need to worry at all. but these - failure? i don't think people need to worry at all. but these drills i to worry at all. but these drills are supposed to do is test the

systems in the submarine that they can actually programme and launch the missile. that what is what happens every time, we get a summary of the major briefing which is vanguard has done. the missile is an old one and i would say they are the equivalent of crash test dummies. they do not fly like the real thing. they do not fly like the real thing. they are absolutely loaded with telemetry greer and test equipment and i understand it is a failure with the test equipment that caused the missile to fall as it did. what the missile to fall as it did. what exactl is the missile to fall as it did. what exactly is traded? _ the missile to fall as it did. what exactly is traded? to _ the missile to fall as it did. what exactly is traded? to take - the missile to fall as it did. what exactly is traded? to take our. exactly is traded? to take our viewers through, we often talk about trident but we don't really know what it does. it trident but we don't really know what it does.— trident but we don't really know what it does. ,., ,, _, what it does. it is a missile system that has been _ what it does. it is a missile system that has been at _ what it does. it is a missile system that has been at sea _ what it does. it is a missile system that has been at sea with - what it does. it is a missile system that has been at sea with the - that has been at sea with the vanguard class since 1993. it is made by the americans. it is a british warhead, but once they are given to us, we store them, we service them, we own them and we

also have complete independence over how we use them. so, trident missile system essentially flies off into the exit atmosphere, it has to do so and it has a number of multiple reentry vehicles that can be targeted as you have heard from your correspondent at various targets. so for every missile there are a number of what we call submunitions within the head to go and find their own targets. each one of the submunitions has the explosive power of eight times of hiroshima or nagasaki. 50 of eight times of hiroshima or nauasaki. ., ,., ., nagasaki. so an important deterrent, a nuclear deterrent _ nagasaki. so an important deterrent, a nuclear deterrent as _ nagasaki. so an important deterrent, a nuclear deterrent as well, - nagasaki. so an important deterrent, a nuclear deterrent as well, it - nagasaki. so an important deterrent, a nuclear deterrent as well, it is - a nuclear deterrent as well, it is not cheap. i was just reading each missile is worth around £17 million. so every time a test like this fails, it is lots of money that has gone down the drain as well. the? gone down the drain as well. they are slightly _ gone down the drain as well. they are slightly cheaper _ gone down the drain as well. tie: are slightly cheaper than that because they do not have the full load on them, of course. but one thing i say to people as this is our

ultimate deterrent against the worst thing that can happen to a country. if i tell you that it costs less than home insurance per capita, then you will see what good value the system is. it is a good system as well. ., ., _, , system is. it is a good system as well. ., ., , ., ., ., well. there are of course allowed to --eole well. there are of course allowed to people who — well. there are of course allowed to people who say _ well. there are of course allowed to people who say is — well. there are of course allowed to people who say is not _ well. there are of course allowed to people who say is not a _ well. there are of course allowed to people who say is not a good - people who say is not a good deterrent —— effective deterrence what would you say to them? it is the ultimate _ what would you say to them? it 1 the ultimate deterrent and at a time when we have some fairly autocratic regimes, russia, china, iran and north korea, three of which are nuclear powers who say they will use their nuclear weapons, notjust as deterrent weapons but as war fighting and coercive weapons as well. it is a good time to have a nuclear deterrent ourselves because he gives them positive. at a time when the world is totting up in confrontational terms, to have an independent deterrent as france does as well, it's fairly handy when we

are not sure what americans will do in keeping the rest of us safe. thank you so much, a mall mall for taking us through that story just to recap on our main story. house of commons from earlier this evening here, as there was chaos in the chamber there. it followed a number of different votes and amendments that were tabled around calls for a cease—fire in gaza. as you can see there, there were mps who actually walked out of the chamber during that vote. members of the snp and the conservatives. let's just explain what exactly happened. it was, the speaker of the house of commons apologised to mps after that fractious debate and it was after a

motion was put forward by both the government and the labour party which is a break with convention. so some parliamentary detail that but in the end what happened is the snp motion did not get voted on and the labour motion was the one that passed. we were speaking to a former middle east minister and in reality, this will not change the government's position but it is an expression of a position from the house of commons. that was, mps approving the labour party amendment calling for an immediate humanitarian cease—fire in gaza. of course, as we were sitting there, the speaker of the house of commons apologised after we saw those mps walk out after they said he broke with convention. let's bring you some comments we had from the

foreign secretary, lord cameron. our correspondent has been speaking to him at the g20 summit about the uk's stance when it comes to a cease—fire in gaza. we stance when it comes to a cease-fire in gaza. ~ ., , , in gaza. we have sent exactly the same thing _ in gaza. we have sent exactly the same thing which is _ in gaza. we have sent exactly the same thing which is we _ in gaza. we have sent exactly the same thing which is we want - in gaza. we have sent exactly the same thing which is we want the l same thing which is we want the fight _ same thing which is we want the fight to— same thing which is we want the fight to stop now and the way to do that is_ fight to stop now and the way to do that is to _ fight to stop now and the way to do that is to have an immediate pause as you _ that is to have an immediate pause as you can— that is to have an immediate pause as you can get the hostages out and you can _ as you can get the hostages out and you can get — as you can get the hostages out and you can get the aid in. the real challenge — you can get the aid in. the real challenge is how you turn that pause into a _ challenge is how you turn that pause into a permanent sustainable cease—fire without going back to fighting — cease—fire without going back to fighting. what we have said, the prime _ fighting. what we have said, the prime minister and fighting. what we have said, the prime ministerand i is fighting. what we have said, the prime minister and i is that there are several— prime minister and i is that there are several things you need. the hostages — are several things you need. the hostages to be released, hamas leaders — hostages to be released, hamas leaders to leave gaza, take down the infrastructure of terrorism, you need _ infrastructure of terrorism, you need the — infrastructure of terrorism, you need the prospect of political reform — need the prospect of political reform for the palestinians, a new palestinian — reform for the palestinians, a new palestinian government. that is how you get— palestinian government. that is how you get the — palestinian government. that is how you get the fighting to stop. simply calling _ you get the fighting to stop. simply calling for— you get the fighting to stop. simply calling for a cease—fire does not make _ calling for a cease—fire does not make it — calling for a cease—fire does not make it happen. of course, if you have _ make it happen. of course, if you have a _ make it happen. of course, if you have a cease—fire without those conditions, if hamas is still there and firing — conditions, if hamas is still there and firing rockets and still have the ability to do another october the ability to do another october the 7th. — the ability to do another october the 7th, that will not last. so our way of—

the 7th, that will not last. so our way of doing it, but a pause leading to a sustainable cease—fire without a return _ to a sustainable cease—fire without a return to — to a sustainable cease—fire without a return to fighting that is what i want _ a return to fighting that is what i want. ~ . , a return to fighting that is what i want. ~ ., , , . , want. what is the difference between sto -|n~ want. what is the difference between stopping fighting _ want. what is the difference between stopping fighting now— want. what is the difference between stopping fighting now and _ want. what is the difference between stopping fighting now and ceasing - stopping fighting now and ceasing fighting down? the stopping fighting now and ceasing fighting down?— stopping fighting now and ceasing fiaahtin down? , . , i. fighting down? the difference is you have a pause. _ fighting down? the difference is you have a pause. you — fighting down? the difference is you have a pause, you say _ fighting down? the difference is you have a pause, you say we _ fighting down? the difference is you have a pause, you say we are - fighting down? the difference is you l have a pause, you say we are pausing because _ have a pause, you say we are pausing because we _ have a pause, you say we are pausing because we want to get the hostages out. because we want to get the hostages out that _ because we want to get the hostages out. that negotiation is under way and we _ out. that negotiation is under way and we can— out. that negotiation is under way and we can bring it to a conclusion and we can bring it to a conclusion and get _ and we can bring it to a conclusion and get those hostages out. then, you try— and get those hostages out. then, you try and — and get those hostages out. then, you try and develop the conditions for a _ you try and develop the conditions for a sustainable cease—fire without going _ for a sustainable cease—fire without going lrack— for a sustainable cease—fire without going back to fighting. that is the absolute — going back to fighting. that is the absolute key whereas, just saying, let's have — absolute key whereas, just saying, let's have a — absolute key whereas, just saying, let's have a cease—fire now without any change — let's have a cease—fire now without any change at the behaviour of hamas will not _ any change at the behaviour of hamas will not last _ any change at the behaviour of hamas will not last-— will not last. lord cameron they're s-ueakin will not last. lord cameron they're speaking to _ will not last. lord cameron they're speaking to my — will not last. lord cameron they're speaking to my correspondent - will not last. lord cameron they're i speaking to my correspondent there. i should say plenty more on that vote and the fallout in the house of commons between various political parties and the speaker on the bbc news website. we are running a light peach with lots of live analysis and updates. if you want more on that developing story in the uk, we can go to bbc news online. to another breaking story this hour. a pioneering european space agency

satellite is thought to have finally fallen to earth. the second earth remote sensing satellite described as one of the "grandfathers of earth observation", has been gradually descending, since it stopped operating in 2011. it may have burnt up in the atmosphere. according to the agency deceptively into the atmosphere over the north pacific ocean and hawaii. we can speak to a worker in the esa ground segment department. welcome to bbc news. a successful reentry to the satellite, how significant is that? this is a welcome and good evening. this is a welcome and good evening. this is a significant result for us because des a mission is one of the first missions that we launched and it is basically the most

sophisticated satellite that was ever built and launched by europe at that time in the 1995. in the satellite has provided a wealth of data which has paved the way for the way we look and observe observations today. today the reentry is a great success because in 2011, the soft light was functioning well, originally it was set to glass for a lifetime of three years. it operated for16 lifetime of three years. it operated for 16 years, after 16 years of operation it was still working perfectly, but the agency decided to stop the satellite and the operation to medicate space debris —— mitigate. i to medicate space debris -- mitigate-— to medicate space debris -- mitiuate. , ., ., , .,~ to medicate space debris -- mitiuate. , ., ., , ., mitigate. i 'ust want to break down what ou mitigate. i just want to break down what you were _ mitigate. i just want to break down what you were saying _ mitigate. i just want to break down what you were saying a _ mitigate. i just want to break down what you were saying a little bit. . what you were saying a little bit. what exactly has the satellite been finding out, what has it been discovering about space? the satellite has _ discovering about space? tie satellite has been discovering many things. it has provided us with a wealth of data which has allowed us

to understand how our planet works. basically how the temperature of our oceans and the temperature is changing, the land cover and how it is changing, the makeup of our atmosphere, the ice caps, bc the are reducing. so we got new insights in our planet which is why we still use them today. our planet which is why we still use them today-— them today. one of the concerns is about space _ them today. one of the concerns is about space junk _ them today. one of the concerns is about space junk as _ them today. one of the concerns is about space junk as well. _ them today. one of the concerns is about space junk as well. we - them today. one of the concerns is about space junk as well. we talk l about space junk as well. we talk about space junk as well. we talk about it a lot on the context. debris that remains in the space. so a lot riding on this reentry because if it had not come back, that could have been an even bigger problem. exactly. this is a major problem today and our observation satellites are operating are starting to be very crowded because plenty of

debris there so that a spy in 2011 we decided to lower the orbit of the satellite to make it more difficult to have fragmentation and have an incident with another satellite. so there thank you for taking us through that story. just to say, for viewers in the uk, we will soon be watching a welsh leadership election debate. otherwise, if you are watching around the world stay with us here on the programme. hello there. there's just over a week to go before we can close out the month of february, and that means that we can close officially meteorological winter, and so we can start to look at the calculations for rainfall totals. we already know, however, it's been a record breaker in three areas — in aberdeenshire, worcestershire and north yorkshire. this is the rainfall totals we should see over the three—month winter period. but not only have we seen more than that, in some areas, we've smashed it —

75% more rainfall already. and we're just going to add to those totals, because here's today's rain. eased away to some showers, but there's more wet weather to come into tomorrow, as we see a spell of wet and windy weather sinking its way south and east. behind it, we tap into a north—westerly flow, a cooler, fresher air source set to arrive. we can see the first signs of that in scotland — low single figures here. we're still in the milder air across england and wales first thing on thursday morning. but there's going to be a pretty intense but narrow band of rain easing out of north—west england and wales, pushing its way into the midlands, lincolnshire. ahead of it, we will see gales on exposed coasts down through kent, and that's certainly worth bearing in mind. so a pretty miserable morning here, and that rain will take its time to clear away. slowly brightening up across the south—west and wales. a better story for scotland and northern ireland — sunny spells, scattered showers, but showers turning

increasingly wintry to higher ground and still a blustery story. not as strong winds as today, but nevertheless, gusts in excess of 30 mph willjust take the edge off these temperatures. 6—8 degrees, pretty much where we should be at this time of year, but of course, it's been an incredibly mild february, so that'll be a shock to the system. and staying with a shock to the system, under clearer skies overnight tonight, few scattered showers out to the north and west — once again with elevation. we will see some wintriness as well, but it will be a chilly start to friday morning. low single figures in towns and city centres, just below, a touch of frost likely in the far north. so, as we go into friday, we keep plenty of isobars on the chart and this little weather front will enhance some showers the further north and west you are. so, a blustery, showery story, and that is going to be the theme as we head into the weekend. not a wash—out, there will be some sunny spells. it stays on the cooler side, but some showers from time to time as well.

head—to—head in front of our studio audience. welcome to the wales live debate. applause good evening. next month wales will have a new first minister. tonight the two men vying to lead their party and wales are here live on for the first time in this contest they will face questions from the studio audience from all walks of life, with a range of political views. both voting is under way, and you

will not have a say in this contest. it is labour party members who will choose the next leader, but whoever wins, they will have a big impact on the future of our daily lives across wales. so let's get to know more about them and what they stand for. you can join the debate too. use the hashtag #waleslive, and you can use the qr code on the screen. let's get our first question tonight. itruiith our first question tonight. with “unior our first question tonight. with junior doctors _ our first question tonight. with junior doctors in _ our first question tonight. with junior doctors in wales currently on strike _ junior doctors in wales currently on strike over— junior doctors in wales currently on strike over pay— junior doctors in wales currently on strike over pay and _ junior doctors in wales currently on strike over pay and waiting - junior doctors in wales currently on strike over pay and waiting lists - junior doctors in wales currently on strike over pay and waiting lists ati strike over pay and waiting lists at an all-time — strike over pay and waiting lists at an all—time high, _ strike over pay and waiting lists at an all—time high, what _ strike over pay and waiting lists at an all—time high, what would - strike over pay and waiting lists at an all—time high, what would youl strike over pay and waiting lists at . an all—time high, what would you do as first _ an all—time high, what would you do as first ministered _ an all—time high, what would you do as first ministered to _ an all—time high, what would you do as first ministered to resolve - an all—time high, what would you do as first ministered to resolve this. . as first ministered to resolve this. and you _ as first ministered to resolve this. and you are — as first ministered to resolve this. and you are on— as first ministered to resolve this. and you are on strike _ as first ministered to resolve this. and you are on strike today? - as first ministered to resolve this. and you are on strike today? i- as first ministered to resolve this. | and you are on strike today? i was on strike today _ and you are on strike today? i was on strike today and _ and you are on strike today? i was on strike today and in _ and you are on strike today? i was on strike today and in january - and you are on strike today? i was on strike today and in january and and you are on strike today? i was on strike today and injanuary and i will continue — on strike today and injanuary and i will continue to— on strike today and injanuary and i will continue to strike _ on strike today and injanuary and i will continue to strike for _ on strike today and injanuary and i will continue to strike for as - on strike today and injanuary and i will continue to strike for as long . will continue to strike for as long as it _ will continue to strike for as long as it takes — will continue to strike for as long as it takes in _ will continue to strike for as long as it takes-— as it takes. in what was your message _ as it takes. in what was your message to _ as it takes. in what was your message to the _ as it takes. in what was your message to the two - as it takes. in what was your message to the two wanting | as it takes. in what was your i message to the two wanting to as it takes. in what was your - message to the two wanting to lead wales? brute message to the two wanting to lead wales? ~ . , message to the two wanting to lead wales? 1 ., , ., , ., , , wales? we have been hearing promises for 15 ears, wales? we have been hearing promises for 15 years, excuses _ wales? we have been hearing promises for 15 years, excuses for _ wales? we have been hearing promises for 15 years, excuses for 15 _ wales? we have been hearing promises for 15 years, excuses for 15 years, - for 15 years, excuses for 15 years, but the _ for 15 years, excuses for 15 years,

but the situation _ for 15 years, excuses for 15 years, but the situation right _ for 15 years, excuses for 15 years, but the situation right now- for 15 years, excuses for 15 years, but the situation right now is - but the situation right now is untenable _ but the situation right now is untenable. doctors - but the situation right now is untenable. doctors are -