hello, i'm christian fraser. you're watching the context on bbc news. are you proud to be british or would you trade it for a different citizenship? a national survey has revealed that answer is now almost split across the country. if you are, you are not alone. the scottish government confirmed today it is cutting government spending by £500m. the finance secretary shona robison said the "savings" were necessary to support the scottish government's next budget. the snp has blamed prolonged westminster austerity, brexit, a global pandemic, the war in ukraine, and the cost of living crisis which mr robinson said had placed enormous and growing pressure on the public finances."

but a report from the scottish fiscal commission says while uk government policies have contributed to the pressure, "much of it comes from the scottish government's own decisions". here's our scotland editorjames cook. this is the reality of life less than four miles from the scottish parliament. a community centre handing out free bread to help the residents of muirhouse make ends meet. and yet, now, here and across scotland, the tough times could be about to get worse. prolonged westminster austerity, the economic damage of brexit, a global pandemic, the war in ukraine, and the cost of living crisis, have all placed enormous and growing pressure on the public finances. i must take further and more urgent action now to ensure that we can balance the scottish budget in 2024—25. and i call... there is also £800 million

of additional spending for new pay offers, and all that means £500 million in direct service cuts, plus a raid on the proceeds of offshore wind and publicly owned scottish water. given the recent independent analysis, will the cabinet secretary finally put on the record that the large black hole in scotland's public finances is a result of the actions of the scottish government and not the actions of westminster? this statement is a - threadbare attempt to once again pass the buck. after 17 years in power, always someone else . to blame, again and again. critics of the scottish government say the cuts announced here this afternoon are alarming enough, but away from this place, there are plenty of communities across scotland which say they were already struggling even before this statement. the smp talked about her reset over the weekend. —— s and p.

no doubt about it, this was a bad news day for the snp government in scotland. they're hoping tomorrow will be a better day because that's been the outline for the government and their bills for the years i suspect it will be the first minister tomorrow trying a bit more on the good news front. this report from the scottish physical mission is critically important. it's like the budget office responsibility for the united kingdom. it's a proper independent analysis of scotland's books. and where things have gone wrong for the in the major factor driving these carts is that government is invested more in his public sector, and it has more in percentage terms people in the public sector payroll than the rest of the united kingdom. when you consistently pay them over the previous years that you have to match increases in pay, it cost more money and

somethings got to give. it is somethings got to give. it is obviously — somethings got to give. it is obviously true _ somethings got to give. it is obviously true that - somethings got to give. it is obviously true that their budget is determined by what comes in the october budget at west minister. rachel reeves will set that out. the labour leader before the election said, read my lips, read my lips, no austerity under labour. was he truthful with the electorate?— labour. was he truthful with the electorate? yes, i think he was. the electorate? yes, i think he was- i'm _ the electorate? yes, i think he was- i'm not — the electorate? yes, i think he was. i'm not convinced - the electorate? yes, i think he was. i'm not convinced that. was. i'm not convinced that this matches the definition of austerity for the reasons that i've outlined. these pressures on public finances are because of the fact that the public sector are paid proportionately more than england are. they're about to say to the back seat further pay increases with the which is something not available to england and wales. i am not sure it matches that traditional definition of austerity. at the snp government were hoping for is when rachel reeves came in his chancellor is that spurning taps would come on and money

would flow into scotland and the government wouldn't have to make the cuts that it had to dig today. i suspect more money will come to expect when you're just market to see it for a couple of years yet. the blame is being thrown around in much the same way. throughout the summer, chancellor rachel reeves has been talking about a 22 billion pound black hole in the uk governments finances. which she lays at the door of the previous government. that infuriated her predecessor jeremy hunt, such that he wrote a letter to the country's top civilservant, (ani) a letter to the country's top civil servant, cabinet secretary simon case complaining that it contradicted government spending estimates, that had previously been signed off by the civil service. well simon case has now replied to that letter — and thanks to our chief political correspondent henry zeffman — we know what's in it. i've been leaked simon casey's reply tojeremy hunt, and in passing he says no. the civil service was not brought into disrepute. there was just a sort of mismatch because of the fact that parliament didn't have much time between the general election and the summer.

but then he goes on to make a couple of really quite pointed comments. he says that he would note, this is simon casey's words, that the sizeable in—year changes to spending plans in recent years have resulted from the lack of a new spending review to replan departmental budgets since 2021." now, let me translate the civil service speak. he's basically saying that the previous government's decision not to revise departmental budgets at any point since 2021, before inflation, before russia's invasion of ukraine, was a big reason for uncertainty in public finances. that's quite a claim from the cabinet secretary, i suspect it of rather, it had stayed private, but it got leaked to me. jeremy has responded and said... if civil servant signed off estimates to parliament that are fostered is a breach of civil service code for the respect from any government to of civil service code for the respect from any government to hold the spending review for hold the spending review for the if those estimates were not the if those estimates were not balls in the cabinet secretary is code �*the balls in the cabinet secretary said the county offices acted said the county offices acted appropriate and labours claim appropriate and labours claim

is exposed as bogus. in reality is a political device to justify tax rises. i suspect wills, this row is going to go on and on for the clearly labour trying to roll the pen before you delivered that important in our will. it you delivered that important in our will. , , you delivered that important in ourwill. , , ., you delivered that important in our will. , , ., ., our will. it seems also that there's a — our will. it seems also that there's a lot _ our will. it seems also that there's a lot of _ our will. it seems also that there's a lot of plane - our will. it seems also that there's a lot of plane being thrown around. in the past 2a hours of the go from side to side. it will as you said lay the groundwork for the budget that comes. we're talking about the kamala harris campaign early wrong, she's focusing on m early wrong, she's focusing on joy and this seems to be focusing on going towards misery in the uk. looking at the details and spending cuts and budget reviews for that there is a very bleak picture. again

it complicates matters. and the couege it complicates matters. and the college had to translate what it all meant. it will go back and forth in the headlines as we go and then when the budget does come down that we're going to see those headline numbers from rachel reeves end of the public and decide for themselves with the bad is what's could be what matters most to every break. because ou most to every break. because you ismaily — most to every break. because you ismaily because - most to every break. because you ismaily because she - most to every break. because you ismaily because she doesj you ismaily because she does this will go on and on. it seems to me, what do i know but it seems to me that both sides are guilty of hiding reality. the conservatives certainly knew that that during the pay deals would be expensive and have a cost for them appropriately. labour has settled the pay deals in line with the independent pay review bodies but is trying to say it wasn't a political choice, which he clearly was. as in scotland labour is making a big play of that. they're making a big play of the fact that it is a political choice for the snp to settle the public sector pay row. , ~'

to settle the public sector pay row. , ~ ., �* , ., ., row. yes, i think that's a fair analysis- _ row. yes, i think that's a fair analysis. what _ row. yes, i think that's a fair analysis. what i _ row. yes, i think that's a fair analysis. what i think- row. yes, i think that's a fair analysis. what i think is - analysis. what i think is really— analysis. what i think is really interesting about that remark_ really interesting about that remark from jeremy hunt on x is his feeling — remark from jeremy hunt on x is his feeling of all around this idea — his feeling of all around this idea of— his feeling of all around this idea of it being false. that's not really what i think labour is trying _ not really what i think labour is trying to assert here for that— is trying to assert here for that what they're trying to demonstrate is that there's been — demonstrate is that there's been so _ demonstrate is that there's been so much uncertainty or lack— been so much uncertainty or lack of clarity around public finances _ lack of clarity around public finances that they weren't able to get— finances that they weren't able to get to — finances that they weren't able to get to grips with the spending cuts until they were in office _ spending cuts until they were in office. i think that's a personable reasonably positioned to take. i also don't _ positioned to take. i also don't take a labour government actually— don't take a labour government actually wants to make these cuts — actually wants to make these cuts it — actually wants to make these cuts it is _ actually wants to make these cuts. it is not ideologically in their— cuts. it is not ideologically in their bones for the they know— in their bones for the they know they have to do this though. _ know they have to do this though, they are there for marshalling the rationale for based — marshalling the rationale for based on the records of the past — based on the records of the past if— based on the records of the ast. , ~ ., past. it striking that we obsess about _ past. it striking that we obsess about the - past. it striking that we obsess about the debt l past. it striking that we i obsess about the debt and past. it striking that we - obsess about the debt and the cost of borrowing here in the uk and how we must trim spending on government departments to get the finances under control. you never hear

any of that in the united states for the where the debt is growing, the deficit rolls on from year to year to year, even over the debate about taxes, the trump taxes that come to an end in 2025. there is no conversation about well, we can't reinstate those tax cuts before we can afford it. it doesn't seem to be part of the general debate. ida. it doesn't seem to be part of the general debate.- it doesn't seem to be part of the general debate. no, it only comes on _ the general debate. no, it only comes on every _ the general debate. no, it only comes up every so _ the general debate. no, it only comes up every so often. - the general debate. no, it only comes up every so often. andl the general debate. no, it only| comes up every so often. and a very large headlight number, which i apologise but i cannot remember of the top my head because it grows all the time. is up to 35 trillion? it because it grows all the time. is up to 35 trillion?— is up to 35 trillion? it is, ou're is up to 35 trillion? it is, you're right. _ is up to 35 trillion? it is, you're right. i— is up to 35 trillion? it is, you're right. i probably i is up to 35 trillion? it is, i you're right. i probably last looked when it was 33 trillion. i apologise for that it keeps going on and on. especially in the election year, talking about the deficit is not something that either side wants to mention. post election it may come to the forefront when congress returns in the next week then we're going to be talking about how the

government wants to want to shut down for the end does take over, whether it's harris or trump administration then that will be one of the issues that comes to the forefront. because the us keep spending and they keep pushing economic prosperity, pushing trump especially tax cuts for the kamala harris is talking about big tax child tax credits for that making it more affordable for low income housing. those will add for low income housing. those willadd up. it for low income housing. those will add up. it will come to the fore in the next ten or 20 years where there's going to be a point we can come back from it. as you said, nothing comes to the forefront here. someone can mention the number every so often and it's remarkably impressive how big it is. that will be a seismic— impressive how big it is. that will be a seismic events - impressive how big it is. that will be a seismic events when it happens. will all go to america for holidays when that happens. we haven't been able to afford at the last five years. let's talk about something else.

the way we view ourselves is changing: we are — as a nation — less proud of our history, our economy our political influence in the world than we once were — but we are now more proud of our sporting, cultural and artistic achievements. that's the picture that emerges from the british social attitudes survey carried out by the national centre for social research. robert tombs, is emeritus professor in history at the university of cambridge. two out of three still say they are proud of british history, despite the tsunami of negativity that we've had over the last few years. and oddly, even most of those who don't identify as british say they're proud of british history. nevertheless, the number of those who do say they're proud, though proud, is not the term i would ideally have asked people about has certainly fallen, as has pride in democracy in our system of government, which is a bit worrying. there's nothing wrong with having a critical view of our

past, kezia. it's a good thing we visit them better understand our history. but there is a growing tendency to perhaps look ideologically at our shared history without fully contextualizing it. is that a problem?— contextualizing it. is that a roblem? ., ~ �* problem? no. ithink you're riaht, problem? no. ithink you're right. it's— problem? no. ithink you're right. it's all _ problem? no. ithink you're right, it's all about - problem? no. ithink you're right, it's all about the - right, it's all about the balance. there's a danger of studies like this that think that a particularly the fallen pride in british history in and of itself is a bad thing. it might be a good thing. it might bea might be a good thing. it might be a good thing that is a country we decided that our past as an empire and dominating other countries around the world is well and truly behind us and not something we should have been proud of for the culture wars reference in that package i think play here as well. we had a lot of debate about our relationship with slavery in trying to make reparations for that. if that's less people feeling a bit less proud of their history, i think it's a good thing. i their history, i think it's a good thing-—

their history, i think it's a good thing. i think he was makin: good thing. i think he was making the _ good thing. i think he was making the point - good thing. i think he was making the point that - good thing. i think he was making the point that we | good thing. i think he was l making the point that we all know that britain profited usually from slavery, blood money slavery in the 18th century. if you get to contextualize it you'll see britain stood in the way of more slavery in the 19th century, that was the point he was making. there is across over here in how we view our history for them is become a partisan debate i know in the united states, especially when it comes to slavery. do we more generally know, do we have to be cautious about replacing a national identity, national pride with conflicting versions of history, conflicting identities? i of history, conflicting identities?— of history, conflicting identities? ~ ., identities? i think if we do have conflicting _ identities? i think if we do have conflicting versions l identities? i think if we do l have conflicting versions of history— have conflicting versions of history they are there to be siudied~ _ history they are there to be studied. and they are there for various— studied. and they are there for various people whether students, children or adults to look_ students, children or adults to look and — students, children or adults to look and analyse yourself and make — look and analyse yourself and make your own conclusions. 0ver make your own conclusions. over the past — make your own conclusions. over the past few years people are too quick— the past few years people are too quick tojump the past few years people are too quick to jump to conclusions, to say remember this very—

conclusions, to say remember this very tragic, horrific part of our— this very tragic, horrific part of our history. and they make it into — of our history. and they make it into a — of our history. and they make it into a partisan issue. and they— it into a partisan issue. and they say— it into a partisan issue. and they say anyone who for some reason — they say anyone who for some reason would support it or blame _ reason would support it or blame the government and they turned _ blame the government and they turned it— blame the government and they turned it into a sense of evil for that— turned it into a sense of evil for that which in some cases it is but — for that which in some cases it is but they— for that which in some cases it is but they projected. if we have — is but they projected. if we have conflicting issues then you look— have conflicting issues then you look at them and you say you look at them and you say you draw _ you look at them and you say you draw your own conclusions for that — you draw your own conclusions for that i— you draw your own conclusions for that i don't think you should _ for that i don't think you should get in the way of national pride.— should get in the way of national pride. what it tends to oint national pride. what it tends to point for— national pride. what it tends to point for me _ national pride. what it tends to point for me is _ national pride. what it tends to point for me is if - national pride. what it tends to point for me is if we're . to point for me is if we're going to wrap ourselves in the flag is actually more about art and sport and the olympics and things we can all share a passion for.— passion for. yes. i think that's a _ passion for. yes. i think that's a terribly - passion for. yes. i think. that's a terribly important because increasingly there are so few things that our society that bind us regardless of background, class, ethnicity or anything else like that. sports and culture are a couple of things that do that. actually bbc does that, something they support regardless of a

background for them having faith and confidence and dare i say pride and cultural sport institution might be the one thing that keeps us together. i adores that message for the i am biased, ishould adores that message for the i am biased, i should say that. many of you won't agree, i know that. after the break it's time for the panel. stay with us.

welcome back. breaking news before we head to the panel, you will recall the special counsel in washingtonjack smith revised his indictment against donald trump in relation to thejunior against donald trump in relation to the junior six charges, after the decision from the supreme court to grant greater immunity to a sitting president. donald trump has said in a court filing on tuesday that he will plead not guilty to criminal charges in that revised indictment. which accuses him of attempting to overturn the 2020 election for

that he's going to plead not guilty to the revised charges that special counsel has put forward. now it's time for the panel. kezia, i'll start with you. i've been following this story of the child minder who has been charged with incitement during the to the riots. interesting to a lot of people because she is the wife of a tory counsellor. i think in northampton sure if i'm not wrong. you want to talk about the tweet she sent it whether it breached x's rules. i the tweet she sent it whether it breached x's rules.- it breached x's rules. i know ou like it breached x's rules. i know you like positive, _ it breached x's rules. i know you like positive, upbeat - you like positive, upbeat stories for your programme but i thought i'd remind us of the riots in britain. ifind it such an interesting story because this is an example of the woman who is charged with the woman who is charged with the hater pled guilty to it for the hater pled guilty to it for the things that she said. she said that hotels full of migrants should be burnt to the ground, satellite and she dues should be at mass deportation

of migrants with that was enough to be charged and convicted of hatred but it wasn't enough to break axes rules which is a stark example we yet of how wildly x controls social media to self regulate our. . ., . , , social media to self regulate our. .., ., , , ., ., our. extraordinary. is that a decision _ our. extraordinary. is that a decision of _ our. extraordinary. is that a decision of elon _ our. extraordinary. is that a decision of elon musk? - our. extraordinary. is that a decision of elon musk? i. decision of elon musk? i bet elon musk had something to say about the riots. how can that not breached x rules because thatis not breached x rules because that is gotten substantially more lax in recent months. that actual tweet _ more lax in recent months. that actual tweet was _ more lax in recent months. t'isgt actual tweet was reported by other people on the platform ask and that's how we know it was rejected as having in any way the rules of twitter. not bad enough to break x's rules. but bad enough to lead to a criminal conviction.- criminal conviction. while, some will— criminal conviction. while, some will of— criminal conviction. while, some will of thoughts - criminal conviction. while, some will of thoughts on l criminal conviction. while, - some will of thoughts on that. i know many of you are using other social media companies available. wills, we focus to ride on the picture of donald trumps book of surrounded by secret service agents and the

assassination attempt for that you come across them not allowing joe biden to go out and campaign in public was back he actually said it last night when he was questioned by reporters. when he was questioned by reporters-— when he was questioned by reorters. ,, . ,, . reporters. the secret service won't let _ reporters. the secret service won't let him go _ reporters. the secret service won't let him go for that - won't let him go for that if you — won't let him go for that if you see, he's very tactile he loves — you see, he's very tactile he loves shaking peoples hands and hold onto — loves shaking peoples hands and hold onto them for a long time, he touches— hold onto them for a long time, he touches people, hogs people. as he _ he touches people, hogs people. as he gets into the twilight of his presidency he wants to be out there _ his presidency he wants to be out there as much as possible, whether— out there as much as possible, whether that's with, or on his own — whether that's with, or on his own he _ whether that's with, or on his own. he likes being at one with the people. this is going to be a blow to _ the people. this is going to be a blow to him. this is one of the — a blow to him. this is one of the steps of the secret service is taken — the steps of the secret service is taken since the assassination attempt on donald trump to— assassination attempt on donald trump to be reined back and make — trump to be reined back and make sure they're safe for the party — make sure they're safe for the party will _ make sure they're safe for the party will not be happy because he wants — party will not be happy because he wants to enjoy the last few moments of his presidency for the vessel and think he joins the most _ the vessel and think he joins the most. gotta say, ifeel a

bit sorry— the most. gotta say, ifeel a bit sorry for him. president elect need _ bit sorry for him. president elect need to _ bit sorry for him. president elect need to be _ bit sorry for him. president elect need to be among - bit sorry for him. president | elect need to be among the people. elect need to be among the --eole. ~ ., . ., elect need to be among the n-eole. . ., . ., . people. we saw how much of a hue people. we saw how much of a huge security _ people. we saw how much of a huge security failure _ people. we saw how much of a huge security failure and - people. we saw how much of a huge security failure and a - huge security failure and a breach— huge security failure and a breach the assassination attempt was. now the secret service — attempt was. now the secret service are playing catch up. they— service are playing catch up. they need to bring in these sort — they need to bring in these sort of. _ they need to bring in these sort of, no matter how small these — sort of, no matter how small these precautions to make sure they— these precautions to make sure they are — these precautions to make sure they are safe in any matter. wills, — they are safe in any matter. wills, good to have your company. kezia, a pleasure is always useful to will be back sometime tomorrow. dojoin sometime tomorrow. do join us for that. sometime tomorrow. do join us forthat. have sometime tomorrow. do join us for that. have a very good evening. good night. your latest sports news. we start with leicester city who have won their appeal against the decision that could have led toa to a points deduction for an alleged breach of premier league profit and sustainability rules. leicester city have won

an appeal against a decision that could have led to a points deduction for an alleged breach of premier league profit and sustainability rules. leicester's appeal was based on the fact they were playing in the english football league — not the premier league —at the time the charge was issued. the independent panel has now found the premier league did not have the jurisdiction to punish the club and can't take action. in a statement the premier league says it's "surprised and disappointed" by the panel's decision. america's emma navarro is into herfirst grand slam semi—final after beating paula badosa in straight sets at the us open, navarro, who knocked out the defending champion coco gauff in the previous round, was powered by the home support behind her in new york. badosa struggled to cope with the partisan atmosphere, and although she made more of a fight of the second set, navarro had too much for her, winning 6—2 7—5. for her, winning 6—2, 7—5. she'll play either the second seed aryna sabalenka or china's zheng qinwen for a place in the final. another american hoping to reach their first grand slam semi final is taylor fritz who's up against the former us 0pen finalist sasha zverev at the moment on arthur ashe.

fritz has gotten back in front winning the third set six games to four. brendan mccullum will take charge of all formats of england cricket from next year. the new zealander�*s already the head coach of the test side but from january, he'll also take over the one day and t20 teams. he's also signed a new contract. the move coincides with england s tour of india and the icc champions trophy. in the meantime, marcus trescothick will be the head coach for the upcoming series against australia and the tour of the caribbean later this year. sorry have been derek by five wickets with up to 69—6 at one stay to eventually post 162 for eight for the past centuries and sam karen sorry, chase with two overs to spare for that

picking through the finals on september the 14th. there have been more medals for paralympics gb in paris today — faye rogers won the first gold of day six with victory in women's s10100m butterfly, while callie—ann warrington took silver. kinghorn followed up second in the 800m t53 with another excellent performance. ronnie 0'sullivan is through to the saudi arabia masses in riyadh. the rocket didn't hang about as he beat china by five frames— of the tournament is raise eyebrows for the number of empty seats without a more relaxing crowd makes up for winning the prize here he'll take a half £1 million cover the same is when he won the

world championship for the habitus for comeback was met trump said he was looking at flights only one for — zero down with his back to the wall with a turning things around when the deciding frame. french writer won the opening stage of the tour of britain after a thrilling sprint finish on scottish borders for up the 20—year—old tried to hit the front with 150 metres to go and held up the challenge of britain's eight, second for the bobjohnson third whilst tom hitchcock came in fourth. a day of drama where the men leading both points and king of the mountains classifications has been forced to withdraw from the race put up the banjo writer crash and injured his kneein writer crash and injured his knee in wet conditions on the dissent on stage 16 for the he attempted to rejoin the race on another bike but was unable to pedal because of the pain at the injury season for the his

hopes now over. wet and foggy conditions. the stage was won by spain, breaking away from the pack to take victory the overall race lead leader ben 0'connor holds onto the red jersey. rutledge is near his rival now and the five seconds of his lead. much more at other sports stories around the bbc sport website. that is all for now. good night. hello. today has been a very mixed affair weather—wise across the uk. we've seen some spells of warm sunshine in place, but also some sharp showers. high pressure, this big area of high pressure tantalisingly close to us in the atlantic, but not quite close enough

to kill off these various frontal systems, these old weather fronts, if you like, just bringing bands of clouds and bits and pieces of showery rain, some clear spells in between. it'll be quite misty and murky in places. not as muggy as last night across the southeast corner — 1a in london, maybe dropping all the way to four in the highlands. so, as we head on into tomorrow, we will still have those old weather fronts bringing areas of cloud, some showers which will break out through the day, some heavy ones across eastern england. this cluster of heavy showers drifting southwards across scotland, but there will be one or two showers elsewhere, some spells of sunshine, too, and it will be quite a cool, fresh day compared with some we've had recently. 14—20 degrees covers things for most of us. now, into thursday, this little weather system here drops its way southwards and tends to combine with this broad area of low pressure spinning over continental europe, and that is going to bring some rain. in fact, could be quite a lot of rain that affects southern england, wales, the midlands as we go through the day on thursday. further north, perhaps quite a lot of cloud feeding in, especially across eastern parts. some spells of sunshine, particularly for western scotland and for northern ireland.

breezy, in fact quite blustery in the south, lighter winds further north and it will start to feel a bit more humid. that will continue into friday. our low still swirling to the south, still bringing some outbreaks of rain, particularly across southern parts. but with the winds coming from the near continent where it has been very warm of late, it is going to feel really quite warm and humid as we end the week. so, friday looks like this — outbreaks of rain, particularly across parts of southern england, the midlands, into wales further north. areas of cloud, yes, but some spells of sunshine. and with that feed of humid air, we will see some pretty high temperatures on friday, widely into the 20s, mid 20s for some including western scotland. we could get up to 25 degrees with some sunshine across that western side of scotland. what about the weekend? well, still rather warm and humid, at least for a time. some rain, particularly down towards the south, drier and brighter further north.

at ten: a pregnant woman and six children are among the dead after a small boat capsizes in the channel. in all, 12 people perish in the biggest single loss of life in the channel so far this year. french officials are focusing on the fact that these boat like so many was dangerously overcrowded. —— this boat. our other main story: a child remains in custody on suspicion of murder after the death of an 80—year—old man in leicester. he was a proper gent. i'm just sick — i feel quite sick about the whole thing. we have spoken to a palestinian woman— we have spoken to a palestinian woman who _ we have spoken to a palestinian woman who says _ we have spoken to a palestinian woman who says you _ we have spoken to a palestinian woman who says you put - we have spoken to a palestinian woman who says you put a gun. we have spoken to a palestinian. woman who says you put a gun to we have spoken to a palestinian - woman who says you put a gun to her head _ we track down a notorious extremistjewish settler in the west bank accused of threatening palestinians. 0n the eve of the publication

of the grenfell inquiry�*s final report, we talk to some of those whose lives have been