last week, president donald trump announced a $500 billion equivalent with a number of global tech giants. sector doesn't have to be a monopoly after all. zoe kleinmann — bbc news. next it's newsnight.

and here, rachel reeves tells labour mps to back her economic strategy — good evening. live each weeknight with interviews and insight. and nick is here as always.

greenland — a largely autonomous territory of denmark? on air force one on saturday, president trump said "i think defence committee. and general robert spalding, who worked as a senior national welcome to newsnight. i wonder, when you at "qitif ' ildvoyou "my ' 4&0 you think hapzpzepedfwith—colombia. {la yau think, ~ is next to face hapzpzepedfwith—colombia, {la yau think, ~ is next to face the threat denmark is next to face the threat of tariffs from president i of tariffs frarrr president trump? hope of tariffsfrarrrpresident trump? hope not. haven't certainly hope not. we haven't done anything to be aggressive towards 5 united 7? 5 united state? 5 united statesvand 5 united stateséand haven't the united states and we haven't done any holding back of criminals 2—2 like that, it would are anything like that, so it would

be a very strange situation if states 77 a very close ufi'féfi §f§f§§ ffif§§f§fi§ 5 e??? fifi??- sanctions, ufi'fee efefee ffifeefefie e eefe rz'eee- sanctions, because do ally with sanctions, because we de to over ally with sanctions, because we db to over our don't happening. i don't imagine that happening. would it be that strange of or trump. at trump. really? am not president so i cannot am rfor’resident so i cannot am rfor what ent so i cannot am rfor what he: so i cannot am rfor what he will so i cannot am rfor what he will i) i cannot am rfor what he will i can annot 52? say say that tariffs certainly only say that tariffs certainly wouldn't make us hand over greenland. i mean, this is something just cannot do. it is 57,000 we just cannot do. it is 57,000 danish citizens and there is no way we just cannot do. it is 57,000 we are to hand them over to we are going to hand them over to americans. don't want to we don't want to hand green owe i' over either. trump light over either. if? it would be an light over either. if? - it would be an unfriendly act said it would be an unfriendly act if did not allow greenland if denmark did not allow greenland be handed over. how can "gagging" as w as unfriendly? territory as unfriendly? well, you know, territory as unfriendly? well, you know. - we _ territory as unfriendly? well, you know, - we i mixing - territory as unfriendly? well, you i know, - we i mixing rhetoric know, i think we are mixing rhetoric - politics— know, i think we are mixing rhetoric - politics with _ know, i think we are mixing rhetoric

politics with strategic what is the strate-ic questions. what is the strategic value _ questions. what is the strategic value of— questions. what is the strategic value of greenland denmark? what the strategic value of —e the united we face today, not 'ust challenges we face today, not just russia's_ challenges we face today, not just russia's invasion of ukraine but a _ china _ russia's invasion of ukraine but a _ china that - russia's invasion of ukraine but a china that has become strengthening china that has become even more _ strengthening china that has become even more of a nuclear power. these -== _== ——_*_ii§—n z —= z preident trump is é preident trump is getting at, = 2:2 = _::: the rhetoric com 77 2 the rhetoric comhthrougf 2 the rhetoric comhnthrougd -=: politics comes throu-h, i - politics comes through, i don't i think the actual strategic reasoning for greenland joining the e — what we are talkin- states is really what we are talking about _ states is really what we are talking about. and i think is the abouta - ii. i- ' 9 we actually abquitsar - ii. |. ' 9 we actually be question we should actually be discussing. we question we should actually be discussing- — question we should actually be discussinu. ., , discussing. andzygefrnj .. ~ .~~n i we discussed it on programme progrgmme last in fact. if "wfljnip’ fljmphad mariam misfit ’ tiruimpjh’a’d misfit tit?" ' flu? a hadmade the 7” ”7 eterlia differentie the 7” ”7 eterlia different way. what you say to rasmus, what you say to general

7 ' that 7 7 tihatwould be 7 7 that would be nice if we ’ ' that would be nice if we did. about the strategic because talking abebtthe strategic of because talking abee'tthe strategic of greenland because talking abeutthe strategic of greenland how be explored more with the that theyt do that the?t do hate that they do hate but that very j to and where are very expensive to mine and where they have not been to find any investors 7 investors despite 7 international investors despite for decades for them. it is lgozkjnngor'decacies'far them; it is we would like to certainly something we would like to can always discuss the discuss. we can always discussthe of united in greenland. we have a states in greenland. we have a defence going back 70 defence agreement going back 70 where the us has the right to years where the us has the right to have in if have troops in greenland if they think they need it. currently they have only chosen to have 150 troops greenland. two have 50,000. gr sayfand. two have 50,000. gr sayfnow two have 50,000. gr sayfnow that two have 50,000. gr sayfnow that they 3 have 50,000. gr sayfnow that they need 5 50,000. gr sayfnow that they need more 00. presence iw that they need more ;§j. presence iw greenland. fed more ;§j. presence iw greenland. ltd more ;§j. presence iw greenland. it is nore ;§j. their z n their own 7 their own fault n 7 7 h their own fault thatthey do have it 5 have it at j have it at the j have it at the moment, 5 open for that. greenland important, for sure. but there i people t, for sure. but there i people living sure. but there i people living sure. but cane are people living there and can just treat like you can push them treat them like you can push them around and sell on to another country. i mean, ithink you

around and sell on to another country. i mean, i think you are -e had it been approached in a right; had itbefiefi’aaa’raachéa�*tfi’a’ ’ constructive without more constructive way without the threats and the statements they more constructive way without the threa notid the statements they more constructive way without the threa notid tt outatements they more constructive way without the threa notid tt out a ements they more constructive way without the threa notid tt out a military they more constructive way without the threa not the' out a military they more constructive way without the threa not the climateiilitary they more constructive way without the threa not the climate forary they invasion, the climate for discassing would have been totally 7 and 7 7 n 7 and much 7 7 n and much more let me -ut that so constructive. let me put that so general spalding _ constructive. let me put that so general spalding can _ constructive. let me put that so general spalding can hear- constructive. let me put that so general spalding can hear you. | constructive. let me put that so i general spalding can hear you. at the end of the day, whether �* not climate is or bad. the the climate is good or bad, the strategic— the climate is good or bad, the strategic remains. and so _eei we can certainlyfidiscuss and anybody we can certainlyfidiscuss, and anybody can challenge the zzi—z zzi—- methodolod. but ult'u. - 2-2 dismiss methodology. but ultimately. you dismiss the strategic cannot dismiss the strategic question that remains. i think what the - seeks_ question that remains. i think what the seeks to do is up the eeeeézzarz— .. hype u p hype u p the bazeezeégeeeéfeefé’ _ype up the 77 77:55:55? 2:52“; zzz“: 7i:7_-: —:: = -:z it, but ultimately e it, but ultimately at z - it, but ultimately at the . 2 it, but ultimately at the7 the day we dealing with of the day we are dealing with nationat— of the day we are dealing with national of united

natienateecurit'giafth states... honestly come up promising am the states... honestly come up promising - am - the words - states. .. honestly come up promising - am - the words of- president trump. that is . right, you: :: ’: you are “xyddere'” etaiidhd zyouiarem 77 talking about ”xydd’a’ré” etalking about the relevance of ? relevance of greenland. strategic relevance of greenland. which _ strategic relevance of greenland. which i _ strategic relevance of greenland. which i think is actually more important. that could be the conversation that i that we conversation that i think that we mam last week. ! premise yau. to media clips and they — ”ww-7 w w e — ,,,,,,,,,_ w e —”_ t —”_ rreioric cgnsta fitt— cgnstantly talk aboutthe rhetoric they do not about the thatt llll ...ll 71:7 behind that they do not talk about the behind what the president -reat, let's talk about strategic side oil thihgs. strategic side of things. that's 90mg; ; :; 4 ti 7, 90mg t; a: z; e: w 7 going to 7 here. 7 goingto 7 here. it going to here. it is not not going to happen here. it is not going _ not going to happen here. it is not going to _ not going to happen here. it is not going to happen on the bbc. it is £272: egip §§:—p i to happen directly between the going to happen directly between the president, his team, denmark president; his teameandellenrrtarkand 7 people of _presidentehis teameandijenraarkrande ,, people of greenland. the 77— we can have 7 we can have all 5 we can have all the we want. 2 we want. ultimately

discussions we want. ultimately whatever— discussions we want. ultimately whatever gets decided whatever yvba ;,,-,,- outcome, yvba 7.77.7. outcome, it wbfi 7�*77'77-7'77 7-7-7 77l7'7l77!7.7 7747.7 7-77'7 . - outcome, it is whatever gets decided that whatever outcome, it is not going to be here on 3772 decided here on tv. sure, i wasn't suggesting — decided here on tv. sure, i wasn't suggesting it _ decided here on tv. sure, i wasn't suggesting it - let's - decided here on tv. sure, i wasn't suggesting it - let's hear - suggesting it woulai’te�*t�*shear from �*greenland's a one of greenland's politicians. a member of one of the opposition parties. pele broberg. is parties. pele broberg. this is what he had to say to the us government the j the 7 government. and the danish government. we have a ve clear and the danish government. we have a very clear consensus _ and the danish government. we have a very clear consensus amongst - and the danish government. we have a very clear consensus amongst the - :-=:: parties :-= _a: -: 77— 7 of another country. want to be part of another'country. want to be part of another'countryf - m— want to be part of another'countryf - m_ want to be part of another'countryf - want to be - own _ want to be part of another'countryf - want to be - own country. i have no m _av flpriblemsrfli 7 l" w _av ww w w pr wwhe ww -w ww _w we don't have quitgé'gtété�*ér we écn't a, , llnitgéététgér we danflaé�*feflaét _w_ llnitgéététgér we danflaé�*feflaét for the danish because ww_ because they have had us government because they have had us for— 300 _ government because they have had us for— 300 - so- government because they have had us for— 300 - so theyl ww-wwwiw ww-w �*_www ww-w �* w ww-w wo have had their chance to actually do something — have had their chance to actually do something to — have had their chance to actually do something to improve _ have had their chance to actually do| something to improve - lifestyles. w _www w w how would you respond w how would you respond to i w how would you respond to that, i so, how would you respond to that, general spalding?— so, how would you respond to that, general spalding? when you go back and read the — general spalding? when you go back and read the - papers - general spalding? when you go back and read the - papers that l and read the federalist papers that the formation of the states as a sin-le - states as a single entity.

2 states as a single entity and e�*""§'fl sféfil is; 5 “1515 in“: éhw'i’ ww www w w the e�*h"§fi�* 3�*3�*53 53 5 ”1515 in“: éhw'z’ ww www w w the founders felt we e�*h"§fi�* sfffgl if; if “hal; eh“? fhw'z’w www ww www the founders felt we needed a why the founders felt we needed a republic, — why the founders felt we needed a republic, it really came to republic, it really came down to national— republic, it really came down to national was one of most national defence was one of the most important _ national defence was one of the most important features. and i think what w-1 w are talkin- about here, ware talkin- about here, a ware talkin- ewith here, a w are talking ewith here, a people, i large landmasse withélgggpeeple, ability large landmass withélqqqpeeplet - ability to large landmass withélgggpeeple, ability to defend themselves, 7—5 w.— _w that greenland defend the position that greenland has within the overall strategic has within the overall 25, ae'c not has within the everalietrategi�*e -m— has within the everalietrategi�*e - notjust of has within the overall strategic notjust of the has within the overall strategic not just of the united defence, notjust of the united - really— defence, notjust of the united really makes that question w _ww w -—w than 'ust about w than just about 2 the 57,000 wwnwwwwo_an. wwnwwwww i people on greenland would want. i mean, _ people on greenland would want. i mean. the — people on greenland would want. i mean, the of the w _w states were concerned w states were concerned about ehgdg island; h, j, "w, ehgdg island, ha, ,,, ,,,,, ehgdg island, ha, ,,, ,,w, ehgdg island, haa, ,,, ,,ww survive. let me put what pele broberu survive. let me put what pele broberg said. _ survive. let me put what pele broberg said. it _ survive. let me put what pele broberg said. it i up - survive. let me put what pele broberg said. it i up to - survive. let me put what pele | broberg said. it i up to them, survive. let me put what pele - broberg said. it i up to them, they gstw 2, if: a,:aa aaa ggt make 5 ggt make their 5 gut make their own 7 greenlanders have had of leaving for 16

eptien, at leaving ,de-armarls {9- 15! 2009. all they had to years. singe qgg§,aall theyhad ta is years, singe qgg§,aall theyhad ta is have a then do is have a referendum and then they have had the offer of leaving. you have to listen to what you have to reallylistentg what, are are wa nt want the united states to take from they will stay overfrom denmark. they will stay with denmark until one day it they will independent. also with denmark until one day it they will to independent. also with denmark until one day it they will to understand ident. also with denmark until one day it they will to understand the it. also with denmark until one day it they will to understand the micro—because have to understand the flfierd:bec-§use politicians, have td understand the n�*derda'deceuee politicians, the have td understand the n�*dsrda'desause politicians, the majority of the politicians, the majority of them, agree that want to be them, agree that they want to be one day, but the ran-es within a few timeframe ranges frdm wit'm'n'a few to decades timeframe ranges frdm wit'nfn’a few to decades to maybe never. years to decades to maybe never. it very difficult to be -=—= few people f