are placed on leave. vigils are held in sweden following the deadliest mass shooting in the country's history, as details emerge about the gunman. the trump adminstration has not explicitly ruled out sending troops to gaza — after the us president envisioned as "the riviera of the middle east". allow gazans to stay in the territory, which has been turned into what mr trump has called "a demolition site" after more than 15 months

of israeli strikes. criticising president trump's comments. allowed to return to the site of their homes to rebuild. mr trump against what he called "ethnic cleansing." president trump's announcement on tuesday came after he hosted had no alternative but to move elsewhere. even among some members of the republican party. with kentucky senator rand paul posting on x, "the pursuit i thought we voted for america first. we have no business

contemplating yet another can you confirm that under the president'splans for gaza, the president's plans for gaza, to rebuilding gaza and to temporarily relocating it is a demolition site, no running water, no electricity. the president wants these individuals to live in peace, he is committed to doing that with this bold new plan, and we will keep you apprised of updates as we receive them. almost the entire population of gaza has been displaced by the conflict. for those now returning, the journey home is just international news organisations still aren't allowed independent access to gaza. lucy williamson sent this

report from jerusalem. where donald trump sees a future riviera of the middle months of war. in gaza's northern areas since the ceasefire began. of a president and the realities of home. translation: neither trump nor anyone else matters to me. - now he is telling us gaza is destroyed

the un says 2 million people are fully dependent on food aid. but the lack of shelter has meant tens of thousands there aren't enough tents to go around. this family used to live in a tower block in beit hanoun, razed to ground in the war. translation: we are trying to build a shelter— ourselves, rod by rod. we are worried about it raining on us. i'm worried about everything. but i want to stay on my land, to live and die on it, even in a tent. many gazans trace their roots to places in what is now israel, refugees from the war that marked israel's many still see gaza itself as a temporary shelter,

lucy williamson, bbc news, jerusalem. plan to take over the gaza strip? infrastructure has been reduced to rubble. of the middle east" the answer? breach international law. the united nations charter — an international treaty — makes it clear it can't happen by force. refrain from the threat or use of force." it's also hard to see a situation in which president trump could get palestinians to agree to his idea.

the idea has also been strongly rejected by of the occupied west bank. so as an occupying power. under international law. this is article 49 of the geneva conventions. where people would go. so, there are significant legal issues with the idea of a us and some big practical problems too.

at the arab gulf states institute. you the time be back us on bbc news. we back with us on bbc news. we werejust in back with us on bbc news. we were just in that were just hearing in that report, there are many experts "qantas” w irsaidithispirofposal’ " that havesaid'this prgpgsal a breach that hava'aaid'thia prapaaat a breach of and a big international law and a big question of course, all experts qaestian—ef— sea-rag. att ease-rte scholars are grappling qaestian—ef— sea-fee. att ease-rte scholars are grappling with now, could the 77 now, could the united right now, could the united states actually do this? your thoughts? know. idon�*t states actually do this? your thoughts? know. i don't see any in which ”int/hid; ti; ' 7 scenario in which the united states would the kind of states would apply the kind of force to 2.2 farce raquired�*ta ramava 2.3 palestinians gaza. million palestinians from gaza. drive them into egypt or across israel into aamahaw aaraaa laraatinta' " " because those are the jordan? because those are the only two options. i... the only two options. so i... the have had a policy of egyptians have had a policy of not allowing any �* of

not allowing any transfer of palestinians from gaza into oes back to the egypt that goes back to the 19505. egypt that goes back to the 1950s. they are not going 7— -7:: 7 thatwithout 7 7 7 that without an 7 7 to change that without an enormous pressure enormous enormous pressure and enormous inducement, of a kind that nothing to do would have nothing to do with the americans with holding the theamericanswitilhalding the aid programme. theamericahswithhaldihg the aid programme. would current aid programme. it would to go much further than have to go much further than that. the are in no that. thejordanians are in no to take more position to take more palestinians and they are not going to do and certainly going to do it, and certainly not when it comes to _eople. 777755??? rmfifiififimrifiir people. the whole thin- is a :2: a fa ntasyj f;: a fantasy? and find it absolutely i find it absolutely president would dispatch hundreds trump would dispatch hundreds of thousands or tens of thousands of us troops to drive palestinians out of gaza at gunpoint, and at bayonet point. palestinians out of gaza at gunpoin' the d at bayonet point. palestinians out of gaza at gunpoin' the imagination: point. palestinians out of gaza at gunpoin' the imagination and 1t. it defies the imagination and it is clearly not anything that's to happen. so that's going to happen. at?” ask that's going to happen. 5&5 ' ask this, then, why do me ask you this. then, why do think president stood you think president ira-ma stood there on you think president trump stood there on the podium up there on the podium yesterday side side with yesterday side by side with minister netanyahu, and prime ministernetafiyahu. and it? people prime ministernetahyahu. and it? people are saying

set it? some people are saying could be a negotiating what do ou think was tactic, what do you think was mark yeah, i think to some tactic, what do you think was mark ye i h, i think to some tactic, what do you think was mark y-k to some l tactic, what do you think was mark y_ome i tactic, what do you think was mark : ., ., ~ tactic, what do you think was mark at. of - i tactic, what do you think was mark ye i me of interpreting several ways of interpreting this. one is he's trying to say hamas, look, if don't to hamas, look, if you don't play with on the and release of all the phase and release of all the hostages, maybe we'lljust expel of you. all of expel. all. ef yeu. aee al'a£ —— �* people expel. all. ef yeu. aee al'flf —— �* people from gaza. it's not your people from gaza. it's not something to be taken seriously, it's such a silly that it's a threat that it's a useless; .; ~ ~ ~ it's also threatthat it's a useless; .; ~ ~ ~ it's also that threat. it's also possible that is sending a message to the he is sending a message to the israeli altar right that supports �* view of israeli altar right that supports as �*iew of israeli altar right that supports as transient palestinians as transient people who can be replaced and don't any national rights don't have any national rights in palestine, and gaza or the west bank or any part of the occupied territories as part of the consideration for the occupied territories as part of the con because 1 for the occupied territories as part of the con because he »r the occupied territories as part of the con because he appears to israelis iareaause he'appearrs to preparing to israelis because he'appearrs to preparing to make a nuclear ee-= with iranians with 77 iranians to dealt-115th the iranians te the of dealt-115th the irahiahs te the

of israel. deal with the lrahiahs te the of israel. and so one children of israel. and so one of the important things he of the most important things he said that press conference said at that press conference yesterday is in or yesterday is that in three or four he would four weeks, he would have a regarding israeli statement regarding israeli claims in the claims lithe: accuaied lr's'eat and claima'ihthe: accuaied lr's'eat and what they calljudea bank and what they calljudea and samaria. that's where the surreal �* meat and surreal sort of meat and potatoes'. the gaza thing is = -§ a fake ploy, 77 a fake ploy, butyou basically a fake ploy, but you can see a real us policy in embracing israeli annexation and of their domestic and expansion of their domestic laws into the occupied territories, in a way *¥**'*e�*f'¥% m f g??? “t? israeli really favours the israeli right. really favours the israeli ri . ht. �* , really favours the israeli riuht. �* , , ., really favours the israeli riuht. �* , .,�* right. briefly if you don't mind, right. briefly if you don't mind. we _ right. briefly if you don't mind, we got _ right. briefly if you don't mind, we got - 30 l right. briefly if you don't - mind, we got - 30 seconds mind, we got about 30 seconds left. but you see a fundamental complete shift in foreign when it 7 when it comes to the policy when it comes to the of the future of the middle east here? i not regards to gyeah. lthihk het regards te ... . ~~ future of middle east

a whole, but "fibre, lama? "fibre, butiw'henit a whole, but when it comes the tuture at israei and to the future of israel and palestinians, —: to what 5 to what he 5 to what he is he seems be signalling. he seems to be signalling. he seems to be signalling an acquiescence to 77 attitude that israel's attitude that palestinians be waived palestinians'canned be'waived relocated and aside. releeated'ahd' ' " land can be palestinian larrd can'be taken �* whether by palestinian larrd can'be taken �*whether by israel or the over whether by israel or the united states or whomever it is for, and i would convenient for, and i would look for statement on leek ferthat statemehtrehrt—her ~ ~ .. bank leek ferthat statereehtreert—her ~ ., .. bank the occupied west bank in the coming weeks with deal of coming weeks with great deal of and alarm. will coming weeks with great deal of - and alarm- _ of course, ofurse, that flé’r'y elésélyf ié’r'y erosélnye statement very closely. we appreciate your analysis. �* resident at gaul senior resident scholar at gaul state institute, thank you. acting head of the us agency for international development —

by thanking them for their service. the shutdown of usaid. and for more on that, i was joined a short while ago you are actually at that rally just short while ago. what justra'short—wh'rle ago. what the mood, was the was the mood, what was the level �* resolve? was the mood, what was the level i resolve?— was the mood, what was the level i resolve? level of resolve? there was a hi . h level of resolve? there was a high level _ level of resolve? there was a high level of— level of resolve? there was a high level of- there . high level of result. there were by my count at least 12 or 13 members of us congress who

—e rally as 77 rally as wellfas joined the rally as well as myself at a number of other 7 usaid j �*usaid officials. joined 7 w by a throng of what to my eye looks like at least several people. usaid people7 77 777 people who believe the mission. the miss7io7n7.7 believe them have a united states have a responsibility but also i think value of trying to do good in a value of trying to do good in the world. a value of trying to do good in the world-— the world. staff around the world- -- — the world. staff around the world... from _ the world. staff around the world... from friday, - the world. staff around the world... from friday, what the world. staff around the i world... from friday, what do think of that be7777 ’e’ ;:e” " ”f’ will be? ale will be? fl use a are; rubio has said, he secretary rubio has said, he came the does make america stronger, it make america stronger, more more all secure, more prosperous, all hiv programmes are frozen.

paper notwithstanding the paper waiver that he issued. it does... refugee camps which is happening on the humanitarian front and it doesn't make us stronger to be shutting 77 7 77a7nd77 77 7 7777 77 77 77 7 7 77a7nd7ta7k7e7 7 7 7 7 77a7nd7ta7k7e tra7ff7icki7n7g7 77 7 agricultural programmes, agricultural development programmes, none of se- the 7.52. ”cjrszergfle i: .. se- the staff ”zj’aifen. f”; i: .. se- the staff are ftffergfle i: ., re- the staff are very 75"? -. ., re- the staff are very a; to re rr .. re- the staff are very -;- to ree -- .. that re- the staff are very fer to ree -- .. that they're open to that. putting to the comments that we heard from donald trump talking about elon musk talking about all of what he found and he all of what he has found and he says it has to be corrupt and that without evidence, he says that without evidence, he says that without evidence, he says that without evidence. it is that without evidencegefj§§ _ that without evidence. j-;.— without evidence i entirely without evidence and i io entirely without evidence and i go of— entirely without evidence and i go of to— entirely without evidence and i go of to say it's a of go of to say it's a campaign of active — go of to say it's a campaign of active disinformation. the few

- they— active disinformation. the few - they have _ active disinformation. the few they have made specific tithes: thee hae'e headaraeeeitie rrrffrrfrfrfr about tithes: they hae'e headaraeeeitie rrrffrrfrfrfr about specific aaaertiena abeut aeeeifie "* like aaaertieea abeet aeeeifie _ like this story programmes like this story a so—called $50 million programmes like this story condomszalled $50 million programmes like this story condomszal gaza.