outside of the territory. former spanish football chief luis rubiales is set 2023 women's world cup final. an executive order to raise of a wider trade war. hello, i'm sally bundock. we begin with the latest from the white house. president trump has said that if hamas does not release all the remaining hostages from gaza by noon on saturday,

it, "let all hell break out." on 7th of october 2023, and three others taken the ceasefire agreement. here is the president speaking to reporters in the oval office. well, i would say this — and i'm going to let that be

o'clock on saturday, and if they're not returned — all of them, not in dribs and drabs, not two and one and three and four and two — uh... saturday at 12 o'clock. and after that, i would say, uh...all hell is going to break out. ithink, uh... it's a great... can be that mean to do. if they're not here, all hell is going to break out. hamas says it's delaying the planned release of more israeli hostages in gaza

putting troops on alert, for "any possible scenario". but the ceasefire process has brought positive results for both sides. 21 hostages have been released from gaza, more more than 500 palestinian prisoners have also been freed from israeli jails. but hamas now claims israel has delayed the return of displaced people, continued to target parts of gaza and failed to let in as much aid as was agreed to areas destroyed by war. so it will now postpone the planned release of all hostages.

of violating the agreement and its obligation to possible scenario in gaza. ceasefire to continue, made clear at this tel aviv rally tonight. translation: hamas's announcement to halt i

the agreement. it's small steps, but things have improved in gaza under the ceasefire, progress that would be reversed if the hostage deal breaks down and war resumes. trump's re—election. in the white house. a small country surrounded by conflicts, saturated with refugees.

thousands protested here last week against donald trump's jordan is already home to more than 2 million palestinian refugees. arab—israeli war. maher azazi left jabalia in northern gaza when he was a toddler. including his own family,

now digging through the rubble middle ages, or the days of the native americans and how they got rid of them. he deals with things like a real estate broker, that's not how things are done. between its political ties to israel and the us, and its people's ties to the palestinians. high unemployment here has left native jordanians in any more refugees. we can't find jobs. we can't find any money. all these employees without jobs.

we will die. its key military ally. $1.5 billion a year. a formerjordanian foreign minister, now in washington, the choice is clear. jordan cannot take any number of palestinian refugees, price to pay if you consider the existential threat but risks for amman mean risks for its allies, too. if stability is jordan's

superpower, the threat expect from this meeting between jordan's king jordan is an important ally for the us to fight states and other countries. aid and this will affect the economy ofjordan. but on the other hand, if they receive, palestinians, there will be more unemployment — there are many problems there injordan. it is a case that they will not go back to gaza because since 1948 they could not go back again to their lands. in addition

so it is crucial for the two countries to come stability of the region. they should find another solution to save the for more reaction, comments. it's incredibly unlikely now,

relative to where we were especially if hamas feels that donald trump's words can action, can be executed, and would prevent palestinians from returning to their homes office, of course we had the concern about the outlook indeed, and it's the position now that this is a bad... it is a lose—lose for everybody across the board. breakdown of the understanding.

and refusing to release the hostages or not abiding by the time frame will inevitably lead to a breakdown of the ceasefire regardless. of the ceasefire regardless. so it is in hamas' interest. so it is in hamas' interest. if hamas is interested in returning a semblance of normalcy for the palestinians who have been displaced, sooner to do that and establish the facts on the ground before donald trump can actually come donald trump can actually come up with a plan and really get up with a plan and really get ready to be able to even carry ready to be able to even carry out his vision of a riviera out his vision of a riviera in the middle east, in the middle east, so to speak. so the more hamas also delays so to speak. so the more hamas also delays on its end, the more it creates on its end, the more it creates a situation on the ground that a situation on the ground that donald trump's vision donald trump's vision could become a reality. could become a reality. what needs to go on behind the scenes — critical now, today, and in the days ahead — to rescue this ceasefire

if it is to stay in place and get to phase two? yeah, back channel diplomacy, reassuring hamas that as of now donald trump's rhetoric is merelyjust that, but also to signal to hamas leaders that the situation can only get worse if israel feels that the hostages will not be released and it sends its forces back in, devastating what is an already devastated area. it is simply going to put hamas in a weaker negotiating position going forward. and donald trump all but giving israel its blessing to do whatever it needs to do, so there is none of the restraint thatjoe biden had put on israel and so it would put hamas in a much more difficult position. that has to be made clear to the negotiators. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news.

weidel�*s far—right party shares

orban�*s desire to rebuild europe's relations with russia despite the ongoing ukraine war, as well as his strong war, as well as his strong anti—immigration stance. anti—immigration stance. the meeting comes less than two weeks before a parliamentary election in germany, in which the afd is expected to come a strong second. let's speak to michaela kuefner, chief political editor at dw news. editor at dw news. great viewed this great to have viewed this talk us through the morning. talk us through the morning. talk us through. the impact of this meeting between of viktor orban and alice weidel. �*orban and alice weidel. viktor orban and alice weidel. the impact on the german the impact on the german elections coming up? it elections coming up? it the impact on the german the impact on the german elections coming up?- elections coming up?- elections coming up? it is to 7 to tell if to tell how much of difficult to _ elections coming up? it is difficult to tell _ elections coming up? it is difficult to tell how - elections coming up? it is difficult to tell how much | elections coming up? it 3 difficult to tell how much of an impact it could potentially n could potentially an impact it could potentially have. she had a joint session have. she had a joint session elon musk which did with elon musk which did not with elon musk which did not move the for them. when move the needle for them. when alice weidel�*s afd party move the needle for them. when weidel�*s afd party votes alice weidel�*s afd party votes helped a non—binding motion

across the democratic union the leader of the race. he basically put in an explosive bid to tighten migration rules with the support of afd which was controversial.— support of afd which was controversial. . , ., controversial. that is what you are referring — controversial. that is what you

are referring to? _ controversial. that is what you are referring to? he _ are referring to? he argues he controversial. that is what you are referring to? he argues . controversial. that is what you are referring to? he argues hej are referring to? he argues he did not cooperate because he not cooperate because he did not cooperate because he did not cooperate because he did tell them about did not cooperate because he did not cooperate because he did not tell them about the content and the afd ended up and the afd ended up voting for a document that eehteht end the afd ended do for eehteht end the afd ehded do for that voting for a document that condemned them a populist condemned them as a populist condemned them as a populist party. they felt it was a price party. they felt it was a price to they were happy to pay and they were happy to pay and they were happy somebody was moving on the somebody was moving on the to pay and they were happy somebody was and ng on the to pay and they were happy migration issue and talking somebody was and talking 1e migration issue and talking about border checks and sending about border checks and sending eldedt herder eheeiee ehd eehdihg away from the border, people away from the border, effectively closing german closing german effectively closing german borders to migrants, to migrants, w7 77 7 "w" asylum seekers. particularly asylum seekers. particularly asylum seekers. that is how jumped at that is how the afd jumped at that is how the afd jumped at the opportunity to team up with the opportunity to team up with the opportunity to team up with conservative who currently the conservative who currently the conservative who currently is in the lead in is in the lead in the id in the leedfl'n the that ie in the leedfl'n the that was expected to elections. that was expected to cost the leader in the polls elections. that was expected to the leader in the cost the leader in the polls but it didn't. he is still but he is still stron 7 7 strong at w going strong at 30%, not moving 7 7 strong at 30%,” 7 7 strong at 30%’,'hot 7 7 strong at 30%, not moving going strong at 30%, not moving really. and far afd really. and the far right afd is about 20%. its goal has rte“? éhd the t? fifiht 331.1? about 20%. fee“? tithe the t? fi§ht tilt? about 20%. its goal has is about 20%. its goal has always been, i ...-.- from always been, i heard it from one of its founders, which of its founders,

is... we seem to have lost... and essentially dismantle them. i am sorry. at one point we lost your audio. i have one more question. that is what is your thinking on what might happen after the election if the polling is right and the christian democratic union wins, it is unlikely they will get a majority, they will have to form a coalition, who do they partner with?- they partner with? that is alwa s they partner with? that is always the _ they partner with? that is always the issue. - they partner with? that is always the issue. it - they partner with? that is always the issue. it is. . always the issue. it is. germany always has coalition governments, but this time it is different. the big question is different. the big question is will one partner be enough for will he need two coalition partners? the public has seen the first three—way coalition that was supposed to be a coalition of progress between

the social democrats and greens and others implode. there is no guarantee of every the 23rd, here in germany, this is the same problem that he will have to make too many concessions to essentially form a stable government. having said that we saw him in a debate with the chancellor who is still hoping to perform a political miracle. they are already sounding conciliar 80s so the expectation it could be a coalition with the two parties. we will of course keep an eye on this. the german economy is in a dire spot right now. thank you. the chief political editor of dw news. we have a detail about the line

expect him to maintain the line that he taken which was that he has taken which it was a consensual kiss. he even jenni to kiss her permission to kiss her beforehand, says. he has expert witnesses, requested expert witnesses, experts in who he hopes experts in lip who he hopes will be able to 796 00:21:23