of the rights previously owned by mgm. a bond cinema blockbuster every few years, always made at pinewood, was the broccoli formula. amazon's a streamer. many wonder if the future might follow the pattern of star wars the dynasty that has guided him for 64 years is now firmly in the back seat. david sillito, bbc news. before we go to the weather... falling debris from a spacex rocket has been found atmosphere from space. as the falcon 9 rocket broke up.

re—entering the earth's atmosphere. next, it's newsnight. the new world disorder. simply going to have to reap it? hello and welcome to newsnight, home of top insight and hello and welcome to newsnight, home of top insightand coming of top insight and interview, coming from that building live.

those words are from exactly one month ago, can you believe it? since then, vladimir putin's been invited in from the cold, have been blind—sided. so tonight we ask two questions. are americans on board with donald trump? at his most popular ever. he has been on here longer than i can ever remember! frank, back. frank... welcemeéac'éerr . you. mei]! mm traditififiéllyithé’rgis’g’fiipin for new presidents. what

to the donald's has happened to the donald's popularity? there is no dip. fact, there is there is no dip. in fact, there is an increase, and it is notjust for president trump, it is also for republicans in make no republicans in congress. make no mistake, americans still mistake, americans are still uncomfortable, nervous, even uncornfgrtable, nervous, even. opposed the way he and yet, they 77-7i77 7 n 7 him good marks 7 7 7 n 7 him good marks for 7 7 7 n 7 him good marks for the 7 n 7 him good marks for the first 7 n 7 him good marks for the first sd give him good marks for the first 30 days, they applaud his aggressiveness in moving forward. is some concern [5 there is some concerthe lsgoing fast and too and there will too fast and too far, and there will be a but as of this = trump is more popular moment, donald trump is more popular today than he has at any point today than he has been at any point in either term, even during the campaign. and that because have w " ”fiév'e'éuieaw" w " "fi.;v’e'}.;uie}{;;u}}d w w whéjéléuwielisiédéd him, believe w wwwnglieiehgwww w believe he is w w wbelwievewhewiswtakingw w and others believe he is taking actions they have waited for micro years to see happen. four years. wwwww ww www fouryears. let's and longer then'fcxur years;~let�*s to the and longer thon'four yeere;~let�*e to the question of paying the

turn to the question of paying the bill in europe. in dgfggce bill in,europe. in opinion americans behind a push poles, are americans behind a push to stop being europe's sugar daddy? in a word, yes. do they in a single word, yes. do they nato? absolutely. they eeooert nate? abeeletelye ' bethe? that eeooert nate? abeeletelggge'they that relationship to continue want that relationship to continue and definitely. and strengthened? definitely. but do not believe, and this is the they do not believe, and this is the big shift, they do not believe in bigshift, they do not believe in the war in ukraine stop z :w uwkraine to w uwkraine to win. w uwkraine to win. they w uwkraine to win. they don't w = -= putin. but w putin. but they w putin. but they don't vladimir putin. but they don't believe that american tax dollars should to fund war. we should continue to fund that war. we have inflation in the us, a huge and other w and other priofities debt, and so many other priorities to focus on, and the would to focus on, and the public would rather see spent to the rather see money spent to fight the immigration at the immigration issues at the border than to fight russia in ukraine. for many years, you have advised republicans use your expertise republicans and use your expertise for parties including the republican party, and i bet you can even now shiver your timbers remembering

ronald reagan's standing in berlin, saying, gorbachev, tear down w w are are americans seriously that wall". are americans seriously happy to donald trump pull happy to see donald trump pull putin in from the cold and call zelensky a w;[(,www 11;an w 11;an that's w wallw,wand that's where have to = careful in your conclusions, that be careful in your conclusions, that there is different between be careful in your conclusions, that there is to different between be careful in your conclusions, that there is to walk different between be careful in your conclusions, that there is to walk to different between be careful in your conclusions, that there is to walk to end erent between be careful in your conclusions, that there is to walk to end andt between be careful in your conclusions, that there is to walk to end and not tween wanting to walk to end and not wanting to walk to end and not wanting taxpayer to fund it. wanting taxpayer dollars to fund it. right, 0k. wanting taxpayer dollars to fund it. right, ok. you shared an all right, ok. you shared an article on the popularity of president zelensky. let'sjust on the popularity of president zelensky. let's just nailed this, shall we? president trump said it was 4%, the popularity, which is a number put out russia. you have sourced a numberfor today sourced a different number for zelensky�*s so zelensky�*s popularity. so compared to 4%, what is your number? the number is much closer... here is the issue. are these voters? are you the issue. are these voters? areyou about pursuing war? are

talking about pursoiog the wer? are asking talking about pursoiog the war? are asking about talking about pursbihg the war? are asking about him you asking about him personally? there was a when zelensky was most thefefiwi�*? 5 fifi§fiifiéfi §§17§fi§e¥ww§§ most in america, th5f5ww55 5 fifi�*5fih5fi 5515755e¥ww55 most in america, the pop”; eeeize%?ze popular global w popular globalfigure w popular global figure of them most popular global figure of them all. he was the churchill of all. he was the winston churchill of his time, and still, the public approves of him and successful approves of him and likes successful in challenging zelensky�*s www w abeihiq w w qbeeeimiiw w , . " qbewtwhiswmwuwupsetw w w www ww andtwhiszinqupsethome reputation, and this will upset some viewers who support the proposals of ronald reagan. is not ronald reagan. zelensky is not as now as he was two nearly as popular now as he was two years ago. years ago . years ago. - taking years ago. “45- taking canada? we can't on forever, but on forever, bthjust in terms of go on forever, butjust in terms of testing opinion in america, do wa nt w want canada? americans want canada? they do not. they love canada. consider canada an w consider canadawan ally, consider canadaw an ally, a they consider canada an ally, a friend. many americans have canadian. . . and they want a strong relatives; and they-want a strong canada, relatives; and they-want a strong ca na da , a nd relatives; and they-want a strong canada, and they relationship with canada, and they are not eager to greenland are not eager to buy greenland but make no either, but make no mistake, americans still want american tax

dollars spent for americans on america. frank, stay with a: turn to frank, stay with us. let's turn to our panel. i'm delighted to they our panel. i'm delighted to say they georgina wright, the think tank director who predicted all this in november. i have read your article, you said all this would happen. hello. friend nigel farage in clacton for labour. how did up? nigel farage was elected at well, nigel farage was elected at the last election, so i think it speaks for itself! well, it tells us you have tested some of ideas the doorstep. some of these ideas on the doorstep. mark, are you by the scale mark. are you surbrised by the scale scope of 30 days? it is and scope of these 30 days? it is a well worn phrase _ and scope of these 30 days? it is a well worn phrase about _ and scope of these 30 days? it is a well worn phrase about donald - and scope of these 30 days? it is a well worn phrase about donald trump, well'wornronrase about donald trot—no; "f fair to wellwornrobrase about donald trump; "f fair to say well'wornrpl�*nrase about donald trump; - fair to say that it is a well'wornrpl�*nrase about donald trump; " ' fair to say that it is a mixture but fair to say that it is a mixture of shock, — but fair to say that it is a mixture of shock, but not surprised, shocked, _ of shock, but not surprised, shocked, because of the shia and velocity of the changes are sort of— in _ and velocity of the changes are sort of— in recent- of unprecedented in recent political history. _ of unprecedented in recent political history, and many them, as you £72; iiifl’he her say, are profound: dn'lh . say, are profound: dn'lhaother m say, are profound: dn'lhe other is not surprised, say. are profound: dn'lhe other is not surprised, because

you listen to what 2 you listen to what 2 trump :_=w :_ -w ran on in the election, almost everything he has done are he everything he has done are things he said he _ everything he has done are things he said he would do. possible said he would do. the possible exception _ said he would do. the possible exception is the role of elon musk played as the head of - played as the head of this - m- agency, doge. maybe some people would _ at- agency, doge. maybe some people would at that. they would_exnresss - ' - . n. r; expect would_express sgggg'gg g; yggyg ggy - m— would express surprise at that. they expect him to be as a fi-ure. but if you look commanding a figure. but if you look at— ukraine, _ commanding a figure. but if you look at ukraine, tariffs, at immigration, ukraine, tariffs, the justice — the justice department, almost everything we have seen, as dramatic as it is, _ everything we have seen, as dramatic as it is, was _ everything we have seen, as dramatic as it is, was foreshadowed 2 in the campaign, and predicted in the campaign, and anyone — predicted in the campaign, and anyone who confesses to shocked anyone who confesses to be shocked not anyone who confesses to be shocked - not paying — anyone who confesses to be shocked not paying attention. was not paying attention. yes, _ was not paying attention. yes. and _ was not paying attention. yes, and i read statement from yes, and i read the statement from the address. every day, i the inaugural address. every day, i will put america first. he has the inaugural address. every day, i will put americ post. he has the inaugural address. every day, i will put americ post america and era pre—staged the post america and era europe, and you wrote he would in. europe. and you wrote he weeldde” but the in. europe. and you wrote he woulddo' but the european leaders have been listening? know, ;tening? know, as ning? know, as mark they are not you know, as mark said, they are not surprised at all. the problem is the surorised'ot allihecjeble'e' lathe scale also res. that we

a us administration have a us administration that creates into with creates into linkages with everything. they say, you want us to be there provide security be there to provide security guarantees in europe, then give us ie!!- that sounds better tech regulation. that sounds very nice in practice, but it's actually very 78