there are red ones on here. you see, for some reason i don't see it. it even exists. you say you can't draw, of course you can. stroke after stroke and a local landscape appears on the canvas under the guidance of a master of the brush of a man open to incredibly kind and incomparable energy, a real masterpiece is obtained. there is a little orange, we will add. here i went here here so spoiled. no, nothing can be spoiled, nothing can be, then we take it further, as i am an artist. as i see it, yes, we thank anatoly alexandrovich and the image of local beauties we take it with us in order to once look at

this picture and remember the wonderful dyatlov region, which has experienced a lot, but, nevertheless, has not lost its sincerity and originality. come and discover these places for yourself.

it wasn't early that the lakes of blues were thrown over, that in the rules of the racing forest of the ponajak quarrels take off and wash the creatures. yes, the shrine will fade. the heavens have thrown a tire latitudes behind the woven grin under the sun. you look, he and nick are exhausted, but what about gold sandy beer? i would drink them endlessly, throwing lakes at the tire. i to a small belly, all the more so, i just want from stress, so that the thieves do not know the pestilence, and the lakes of the calm nicole do not like to forget. petrus broca

hello greetings to the guests of those who look at us, it's hard to believe, but this frame is already a year old. it would seem that only yesterday the world watched with horror as the americans literally escaped from kabul, driven to despair, and

people who grabbed the fuselage, like an unfulfilled dream, were separated from the side and flew from a great height to the ground. afghanistan then a year ago did not become for everyone us as such a harbinger of the events that we are witnessing today both in our country and around us , and far at distant borders, let's say, from the republic of belarus indeed. uh, a year ago, the americans fled, they rightly said they fled from afghanistan that they left hunger, devastation, and the rights of women were infringed, which actually remained for 85 billion weapons. the resident of afghanistan, ghani, fled

shamefully, explaining that in this way he wanted to preserve his image, but the image was completely lost, he abandoned his people. he betrayed his people and no image of the world the public, of course, positively remained with the persecution, and you know, i would like to draw parallels here with our events of the twentieth year and remember our president. yesterday, august 16, when the president went to the square and showed that he was with the people, that he was ready to defend the country, he would not run away, and it immediately became easier for everyone to breathe. this is how a president should be. and if we draw other analogues, here with the same ukraine with the same lithuania latvia and so on. there is also a presence of the united states here today america and what do you think, everything will end positively no? and that's why here are colleagues. why is that? but afghanistan is a symbol, isn't it?

for all those who are now figuratively, they say they are clinging to an american plane that is gaining altitude and it is not known where it will land, because it is now brewing in america itself. well, such a systemic internal crisis. it is not known where the plane will take off next. where things will land. why do lithuanians, latvians, poles , ukrainians think that the americans will deal with them, otherwise it won’t come to them, through for some time, fall off the plane in the same way and crash on the ground, flying at great heights, as usual, just the same our neighbors or two poland and other countries that work closely with the united states and understand what is happening in afghanistan what happened to iraq with syria and so on, but it seems to me that such a classic principle of democratically elected rulers is included here. and this is the lack of a strategy of some kind how to plan the movement of your country, if you are conditionally president, and poland or lithuania and if you don’t care. 10 years, no matter how hard you work, someone will replace them and

it all comes down to a banal tactic to somehow survive, uh, and help, if there is such a desire, the people of your country, here and now, what will happen in 10-15 years. it's up to someone else to decide. who's going to come. after me, there will be some elections and obviously someone else will be appointed. that is, it seems to me a big minus, but this principle, a maximum of two terms , is that countries cannot, their strange leaders, cannot build an adequate strategy for a decade ahead. well you you know, in general, european values ​​have always been, unfortunately, arrogance. the arrogance of rudeness towards others. you look at how they behave since the time of the roman empire. there are plebeians, there are patricians, they treat us like klebeians. this is already an ideological code, a cultural civilizational code. we won't change them. it 's like visiting europe is not a human right, it's a privilege. i just looked at this

wording myself. where is it from the heart? she is not from that culture of roman culture, and now this rudeness is in relation to everyone. why are you beautifying them? what is roman culture like? these are purely fascist slogans and ended at forty. the fifth year must have been somehow revanchist authorities. so the roman empire ended with the same revanchism in a certain sense in a certain territory. and then i don't argue with you. yes, you don't need them. printing them is useless to denounce. you know things by their proper names, you understand that what was not revealed to us from this is no better, the problem is that we say that when they stop, when they gradually, yes, never they will stop only when the russian tanks are in berlin, then they will stop for 50-70 years. but let's take it

apart, but they supported alexei alekseevich , look from afghanistan, we are moving to ukraine and we are now seeing one of the most discussed topics, these are constant provocations around the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, what kind of card is this, who and how and for what it is being played right now, yes there is a lot of talk about the nuclear power plant now, all experts assess this on the part of the united side in different ways. they say that there, but there were some secret developments of the americans, therefore, with the hands of the ukrainian apu, he is trying to destroy these development stations. but this is one of the versions, the other version is unequivocal, which is a hmm this way. and this can actually be considered a provocation, aimed at blaming russia again for a nuclear catastrophe. it is clear that for europeans or a western layman there is given. a completely different picture that it doesn’t

bomb. uh, nuclear power plants are so evil russians and they create the conditions for an atomic uh, nuclear catastrophe, which can then result in uh move to europe it is clear that am, but the ukrainian authorities do not decide anything and the goals for nuclear power plants are given unequivocal command of nato by the americans and the british. but why, in the end, do they make it clear that the russians will not make it clear that he and the magatet will not go there, because they are funded by the united states yes, and they will perform a completely different role, which means one task remains. and hmm, for what purposes is the goal alone to create conditions for the russian troops to move away from this territory, yes, create a cork further, and move it to

side of the crimea or disrupt the referendum, which is also expected in relation. and kherson zaporizhzhya e-e regions on joining russia, we are all clear. we see, we understand, but, uh, the course of history cannot be changed. do you understand? we have already discussed more than once in our program that the ukrainian case, it has already been lost for the british and americans, and they understand this, therefore, it is natural to take such drastic measures in the form of e-strike on a nuclear power plant. here, look yes, continuing the topic of several opinions, so that we are here as much as possible for the viewer offered the full picture. yes, because the night is obvious. here is the information dome that is over european viewers, readers , internet users, it does not allow them to compare six straight lines between point a and point b, that is, forces that on the one

hand, ukrainian british propaganda shout that it is allegedly russian shelling the zaporozhye nuclear power plant there, the next day, a statement is issued calling on e representatives of the eu countries e, it means that russia should liberate the territory of the zaporizhzhya npp that is, after all, russia controls so, uh, sergey glazyev, one of the most famous russian economists, one of the leaders of the eurasian economic commission, clearly says that this is blackmail and a statement that the g7 makes and demands that russia return this a under the control of the nazis, what in fact? this is nuclear terrorism by the us and its satellites. according to yes definitely, because . well, look, it's generally possible to add just 2.2 here. today there is an appetite in social networks in ukraine people ukrainians. they are well aware of what is happening need zaporizhzhya well, this is a petition all the time. they ask, there just stop here's an attack on the zapo. this petition is removed simply from social networks. it is ignored,

and the united states, they are far from on any other continent, they did not think about the inhabitants of hiroshima nagasaki when, just to show their strength and advantage in the world, and did not drop an atomic bomb on two cities, when children suffered with a woman and what were serious consequences for the united states. you you know how it is absolutely all the same to zelensky and his jokers. well, you also need these criminals, definitely. i can tell it, this is not the ninety-fifth quarter. this is a country where living people live, and besides this country , we also don’t forget that if some kind of trouble happens at the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, it will suffer and belarus will suffer, the russians will suffer, europe, in the end, it is assumed that the black sea coast will generally be inaccessible there for any swimming this, in principle, is for a vessel sailing, the black sea will be available; we will continue this topic, except the political component, which certainly

exists, in addition to some military-strategic moments of the withdrawal of russian troops, which the russian federation, of course, cannot go to, not even what it does not want, well, everything cannot go for various reasons, finally, there is an environmental, humanitarian component , a component, because we remembered that before the zaporozhye nuclear power plant there was chernobyl there at the power plant and the provocations that were there now we see reports that sabotage squads undermine power lines. let the area another. here, after all, huge waste remained on zaporizhzhya. uranus exactly . if we start tying these objects. we understand that the plan is to create a kind of local nuclear situation. it is not just real, they embody it before our eyes. and what is the goal, given that it's just to turn off such a piece of the planet, the earth is the wind, it turns out, yes, not yours, not ours, we are losing. ukraine then, she is dissatisfied. yes,

for this case, the black sea. they just start romania hungary they just fall by themselves. we but even then what they have just drawn, there is a radius of 1.500 km. yes, this is a trifle, because we do not know which wind rose will be where they will go and so on. it will reach paris. they can't figure this out. so they are europeans. they can just think. the thing is that europe has been in europe for a long time, yes, and from the very beginning, the conflict around ukraine is completely unnecessary. and even because the macrons always feverishly called putin, trying to somehow agree. that is, it is already clear that why europe needs the same ukraine at hand now for the european union, taking into account the fact that the problem is in the economy. there is a threat to be left without gas. they seem to understand very well that there are slight hints that sometimes it happens that the pipe breaks before winter, but they understand everything perfectly, and then there is also the threat of a nuclear catastrophe, which

will affect the eu as well, therefore, uh, european politicians, who say something it is now beneficial for them to sit down at the negotiating table with putin because now they have a common nuclear problem with putin, which is created not by europe and not by russia, but by ukraine supervised by britain and the united states invited the macron. i think this will be the way out. perhaps, perhaps not. europe she know how before or like a dog. that is, she understands everything, but she cannot say anything and is no longer allowed. here's the other side. we are seeing that in the west today there are more and more voices that are already beginning to seriously say such things, and with those we are friends, well, this is unconditional support for ukraine and on august 10 in newsk magazine, and an interesting article by steve cortepes appeared, which is called perception zelensky changed a lot of interesting thoughts there. here is one please, zelensky be responsible corrupt autocrat russia-ukraine

standoff doesn’t affect vital us national interests biden intervention harms america and degrades the ukrainian people america should push for dialogue , negotiations and de-escalation, if the parties refuse, it’s time for realism and restraint from the us because this is simply not our fight. and zelensky is certainly not our fighter. once again, this is not charlie, abdual caricature. this is a newswake magazine, a very respected building. and these are the statements of the american edition. further, cortes is not alone in his thought, the biggest figure in the uh geopolitical diplomatic arena, but henry kisenger, who gives an interview to wall street jonul and reports the following: we are on the verge of war with russia china over issues that we have partially created these without having any idea about how this will end or where it should lead and go on that the apocalyptic

potential of modern weapons technology does maintaining the balance of hostile parties. no matter how simple it may be, it is the most important imperative of international relations. if you translate, then lay down with bones , but the west, east, reconcile, this is generally an opportunity. you know, first, the whole problem. here are the brushes of the same and many of these politicians in that they always speak after the fact. something that already exists, but has not been announced before, but is not offered. as for you know, there will be no dialogue between them . well, what's the matter, his parents in berlin gave birth to the main argument, they gave birth to him, why, in order to destroy, as the president correctly said, the slavic civilization is such status personal as kislinger, they act as a kind of mediators who say so capital,

we stop to understand that we are a little, but played too much, and could not calculate our resources . we need reconciliation. the west goes for reconciliation only when it understands that it is weak, that its strategy has not worked. if they understood that they could put the squeeze on russia and even could. such they would squeeze and established total hegemony. now they say, no, let's try on. and why try on, because after 5-7-10 years. suffocate again. uh, full format. the chinese understand this, the russians understand it, so what they do. now look, uh, some tactics have been chosen. uh, they chose beijing as moscow, they cut off the west from the colonies of africa completely in latin america and suffocate uh hmm anglo-saxon europe from the resources that they had in parallel in parallel now and you

have already begun to talk about this in part the whole hybridity is still in effect in all its glory, that is, the economic, military-political and moral components, including, look what they are doing, they are raising, but the russophobic wave is much more serious than that which was there in february and march. it means that they are making a statement by the prime minister of estonia, as we all heard you, who noted that a trip to europe is not a right, but a privilege. today we recalled what was said and done, and from august 18, estonia ceases to let citizens of russia with schengen visas, the initiative was enthusiastically taken up by finland lithuania latvia poland and slovakia, and although germany-france is against it. at the end of august, there will be a serious discussion of the prospect of refusing all russians to make even more such harsh statements. they've been looking for some time. well , they themselves can not, who would give here. well, well , it’s quite such that, well, it’s a shame

to speak such a figure yourself, good, to pull it out of your mouth to say, speak and eat it, he specially invented it for this. this is vladimir zelensky, he goes even further in his opinion. i quote further. whatever the russians may be, that is, for putin against putin, they need to be sent back to their homeland and held accountable. the entire population of russia will continue to quote, which we have more than once today. let's go back, it's very revealing, and now it's wafted in the forties of the last century, russians should live in their own world until they change their e, marinsonage philosophy, what is it? this is what they are trying to europeans. show before the cold winter. that's who you need to roll the barrels on. well, i have already said that in general russophobia itself is a very old story. for thousands of years, maybe even more, all the time to this issue, the europeans came, then gave back, because they understood that it was necessary to

be friends with the russians. well, they signed, and there is no need to prove that they are not all fascists, like fascists from the geography of the european union - this is not all of europe, of course, of course, to close europe for russian belarusians. so let's play these games. we are so far we will have a rest on baikal and in belarusian sanatoriums, however, by the way, there are a lot of russians. and by the way, the europeans. here i am now resting in a sanatorium, there were latvians who came to us with belarusian estimates. we will have a rest, we will be glad to see russians on the territory of belarus. they also think they will be glad to see them at home. yes, let them go and bring us money. we will meet them and show how well we live. and of course, listen, well, this is a terrible thing. actually, it's scary. yes, between ironies. it was just that at first they didn't want to, they didn't want to to see the russians in the european union, then they will smoothly reach in order to first try to take away, uh, the russians have the right to exist in europe and then the right to

exist. basically, well, it's a tough strategy. it's a tough strategy, but a smart one. the worse it gets for europe for the states and britain, the more aggressive their policy of russophobia will be, because the stakes are getting worse all the time. uh, the life of their citizens and you need to re-explain why some external enemy is to blame for everything, obviously this is putin russia soviet union lenin everything the rest up to the kings. yes, therefore , the further it goes, the more aggressively politicians will speak out, so that conditionally an american is a british, sitting at home. uh, there is an unwashed saver on food, but i thought, well, how would it be putin's fault in everything. i will hate when a person hates someone. here we see during the time it is very evident in the poles. not for everyone, of course, yes, but when hmm hatred for someone, or for something, it is already brought to the absolute. i hate russians then a person ceases to perceive at all.

some kind of reality to seek the truth is only hatred, and the truth, and some reasonable information about reasonable news and data will not reach there. and that's the goal, too, it looks primitive, but we've seen that and more primitive things. they work quite well for themselves, and when they get to the appropriate audience , an attempt to drive russian belarusians there, chinese fugitives home, so that they blow up the situation from there, and, uh, lanzbergis. here, so that we do not think it out or not, they have in mind, he specifically says. let them sit in their own country and prepare the most changes interesting. here they are all talking heads, because this is the original idea, and it was broadcast back in the twenty-first year somewhere in the summer in june in july on bbcnn, and analysts were already actively working at that time, at the same time, such a philosophical school, and they were interviewed. they openly said that we need

to do everything in order to drive the russians back to russia so that they, uh, feel that they feel so bad about the fact that putin is pursuing such a policy, and thereby demanded changes. and here we would come to the fore and say, we are ready. bring you. there conditionally democracy and so on. that is, now, in fact, all these puppets are these estonians. there are latvians and lithuanians. they are just talking heads and broadcast what has already been developed in the thought factories of the collective west. yes, but one thing must be understood here, that is, they form the ghetto yes, for the conditionally slavic world. and hmm uh, we have already seen this model, uh, it was worked out during the period. uh, nazi germany in relation to the jews. yes. uh, why are the germans so bad? because the jews are to blame, right? here the model is the same for in order to form, but a model of fascism, and they are moving towards this. that is what we are

seeing now. in europe - this is not fascism, this is just before fascism. yes, and then it will be clear. e, the formation of a certain single pool that will fight, e, on a common front, and with russia and china, but for this you need to set it up. eh, to form this militant uh hatred of our population and, uh, to direct it towards russia, we are very much from the point of view of political technology. they work methodically according to plan, but you need to understand that a all such attempts they end with only one, as it was rightly said, that tanks, for some reason, end up in europe and there, uh, uh, the english channel. it might turn out too. and maybe washington will turn out, because we are aware. e, yes, it is very clear that , including awareness, we belarusians are aware of something else, but the world community, which is much larger than these europeans and ansaks, that

’s the activity. their aggressive uh elements, yes regions it leads uh to a situation of threat to all mankind on planet earth and that means they need to be localized, forced to send them to the ghetto and watch. uh, behind them, like in a cage. there , sometimes they say that russophobia in general has reached a completely new level for about six months. look who the vatican is attracted to. look at the relationship in these to orthodoxy. to the orthodox hierarchy in general and see how these satellites, estonians, latvians, and so on react. well, they are trying to forbid there to ban cyril from entering there. but this is a trifle. after all, the most important thing is that the pope starts to voice. and quite, i would say, a savage inquisitorial last even a statement i will

meet kirill there in kazakhstan in the fall, but i will immediately resign . that is, i will wait for this meeting, but in the same period. what does he do, he reads coins with the basics, including yes, he fully supports all these awkward fascist non-nazi movements, so that people really don’t think that it’s just that few people know, but nikolai sergeevich a great specialist who is on science. well , the relationship between the church and the state follows, many works have been written on this topic, so he knows exactly what he is talking about, and we will illustrate the vilnius church for you , and then something happens that is somehow incomparable with the theme of the faith of god and the church. let's see what xenon does. this

is the kissing of this banner, the destruction of the protest. here is the symbol. who does this strategy of the catholic church work for? they are the roman catholic church of the vatican. in particular, with regard to the faith of the faith of the confession this interfaith dialogue. it 's easy to do here. excuse such a cauldron of hatred of hatred that here it will not seem like a bartholomew to anyone will remain in the past and therefore here i want to say that we see the role of the vatican in all these nuances in ukraine what is being done as soon as the pope said a few words, i will go to kiev what happened about 50 other churches at once squeezed out the orthodox, several dozen orthodox priests were killed. this is just one phrase of the pope of rome, how dear it is he thinks with his head before speaking.

the main question arises when you observe what is happening. how are we going to respond to all this? here, in a couple of minutes we will definitely discuss, stay with us. we continue the program, and while the advertisement was going on, as if there was a discussion, we understand that this confrontation has entered that territory, which we probably have not yet encountered in recent history, and here we all need to be extremely careful . i mean to all belarusians, catholics, orthodox muslims, who live on this earth. we cannot get involved in this confrontation, we cannot be dragged into this confrontation. it's not about us. that is, as soon as we see that someone starts to share. we must immediately turn on this light of attention to awareness in order not to succumb to this provocation, because nikolai sergeevich is right, it will be a chowder of any others, and the confrontations that we have ever seen, here we see a huge roll that is now. we see that the economic pressure is military-political

moral pressure this is the religious pressure to come and the main question now. and what should we answer? that's what we can oppose igor what do you think, well, i 'll probably start from a not unexpected side, when we mean, we always need to clarify this for us to whom, who is meant, but hmm it seems to me, having looked, including how the head of state works. i think this is his a thought in the first place, and to us the majority of belarusians. now it is extremely important to attend to your current affairs and responsibilities and do them as well as possible. that i certainly have several such personal examples of friends of buddies who actively take part in discussions. and what should we do in the current situation in the comments there somewhere among themselves. as a result, by friday, it turns out that nothing has been done in a week, how would people just spend time in discussion. that's all, of course. as for what and belarus, under the leadership of the president, will do in the

near future, it seems to me, but my thought is quite simple the world around is going crazy and it will be very bad if we go with mind with them. here it is, uh, appeals of certain categories of citizens. let us ban everything from enemy countries there. let's go shopping there. uh, only the goods of those countries that are friends with us, and everyone else will not do this. and in general, why do we sell sugar, and everything else, to the poles and lithuanians. may they burn in hell, and so on. this is not good. and hmm we are like a country. it seems to me, uh, they should do the simplest thing. pragmatically look for ways to make it economically beneficial for us take some step, but still the economy. dominates in my opinion over politics and hmm, the mirror answer is yes, but if the mirror answer is not economically profitable for us, then we can get around ourselves for the fact that this meeting was in miory

last week, when it was visible to the police and it was clear that the leaders, well, the workers who gathered there, it was clear that they were waiting and were afraid of this meeting, because the fate of the enterprise was unknown. and it's not a question of employment - it's a matter of survival. these here are the fault of those who used to be this a question, because if from the moment when problems began at the plant in mioh, and lukashenka was invited immediately, then people would have been waiting for him, as you understand that, well, now the president will arrive to resolve the issue, but he does not go, lukashenka drove and gave. here is what makes it special. he is on one side. e, he made it clear that no one would leave them or leave them so that the enterprise would exist, but at the same time, this is the difference immediately from those who made a beautiful statement, what he said, and now we will work. it will be harder. hardest job, but the business will not fail. let's listen. there, after all, this thought was voiced, which , it seems to me, concerns not only those who gathered that day in murals, please, this is a time of opportunity. and only

those who will come out of the crisis stronger, who will run, let's go on foot, will catch up with us and crush us, they will trample and deed. it's not even in the politicians of these politicians. soon there will be no cheek time, there is no one to talk to today. well, you know, politics is politics, and the business of production is production. if they need this, this is the gold that you do it in a roundabout way, whatever you like, but we'll sell it. well, remember that the main driving force in this is you, not me. i have a sea of ​​​​such cities, you have to work to earn money to build your own housing with the help of the state and protect your land. you. you know, the president is such a person, we know him, who does not

just come at the invitation to come. you can only why to rectify the situation? well, there are leaders. i understand the president to travel to every point. from such more than 10 points there was everything, at least, which can break out, well, more or less something is being done there. yes, we did the same thing. right now the president was, yes, that is, he is not satisfied with the speaker. and this was an appeal not only to the workers. it was an appeal to everything managerial. eh, to your body to all frames. if you can't handle it, step aside, we'll manage without you. we will find a job for you, that is, it is a matter of the personnel policy of the public administration system, making adequate instant decisions. and don't wait for the president to decide. in what there.