i understand that ok well, adults have the right to choose their environment. yes, but why a child? well, i can’t protect the child, he will also, in adulthood, communicate with those with whom he is comfortable communicating tatyana admits. she doesn’t even get into quarrels, and even more so, she doesn’t waste her time proving her own innocence; their small family lives in a small world that is comfortable for them, and life in the village itself contributes to this, and they listen to other people’s opinions a lot, their principle is, first of all, to listen to themselves .

if i listened to the opinions of others, i would hardly have brought an indian husband there from india, so i gave birth to such a chocolate daughter. here, i would live in the village, i would not eat meat and so on, in fact. it’s just that i’m so comfortable in the first place and, accordingly, when you allow yourself to be yourself, then you allow it to others who surround you, so i will never impose anything on anyone so that you can’t eat meat there. you can't buy things there. no , just a person must understand what exactly he needs. and once it's every man for himself she will understand and become a happier person, and tatyana is absolutely sure of this, because she herself is her family, and they live and build their lives as they want, not paying attention to other people's stereotypes, being free themselves in their choice and giving the right to others to be the same way, bringing a little sunshine and a lot

of human warmth to the belarusian village

program according to the script today we are visiting our studio sergei rachkov, chairman of the permanent commission of the council of the republic of the national assembly of belarus on international affairs and security and georgy atamanov member of the council of the communist party of belarus good evening. glad to see you visiting us. today we will talk about a topic that is now being very actively discussed in all expert circles, the possibility of the so-called second iron task from the glands, 20-22. do you think how realistic this is in, let's say, so even in the recent conditions of globalization of the whole world. well, today is really a very simple and disturbing situation in the world. uh, the collective west, of course, is not ready to surrender their positions, uh, the emerging multipolar world order. well, let's say conditionally while it is noticeable that at the head of the chinese people's

republic with the russian federation so to speak, fell, this iron curtain. and when, unfortunately, the big e disappeared, the huge one disappeared. uh, at that time a very strong country, the winner of the great patriotic war. uh, today, of course, the trend of globalization. it's, uh, getting less and less common. and these are the forces that have shaped the world order of the global world order. and this is primarily led by the united states of america e. today they are trying to use absolutely all the tools in the political ideological struggle. and it is in

the economy, it is in politics and in the humanitarian sphere. uh, so uh, unfortunately, now we see that they are no longer just walking. uh, talk and proposals are made, but also restrictions yes restrictions visa restrictions although quite recently literally 2 years ago. e, the republic of belarus and the european union. they wrote the visa facilitation agreement to reduce the cost of visas in order to , yes, in order to, after all, the countries of e, communicate even more. eh, we decided together. uh, both economic issues and regional security issues, but uh , unfortunately, of course, today u

still, the united states of america , feeling that they are losing their power over the world. uh, the powers of the world gendarme. they try, of course, to put pressure on to put pressure on e countries, first of all , countries of the european union, which today not only e, ukraine is under external control. well, in general, we can say. it is that the european union is under external control under the control of the united states well, hypothetical for now, uh, the countries of the collective west remain here, the same european union on this side, belarus and allies, who will be on this side, with whom we will have to deal in closed conditions, first of all probably the economy to develop. you know, i i will take it from my colleagues in the sense that the so -called curtain fell for the first time after

the war on march 5, 1946, winstor. churchill spoke at folton hmm in college. and he was just saying, then this meeting of him for more than 15 minutes with the muscles of the world, and then he said what needs to be done so that the only america is the owner and so on and the whole methodology was developed and even then it was clear that those were. the achievements that were achieved by our soviet soldiers in the liberation of europe from your everything began to slowly recede, and they were waiting for leave, the last participant in the war. and this is where it all starts again. and now just the monuments the second second so-called moment is empty of the lowering of this iron curtain. the fact is that the world is now at a break in this version, it will no longer exist. this is a historical process and historical cycles are repeated in this regard. apparently i am a

historian. this is the story. nothing is taught or learned. it all depends on which elite governs there or in other states. but what is the so-called anglo-saxon with this has been doing this for a long time, we have known this for a long time, but you remember, after this curtain fell, after that immediately america had a new plan to try to bombard the soviet union with a nuclear weapon, since japan did it . then a change begins in relations between the allies in the war, in the second world the frg appears first , then three countries will be freed, then the gdr and then in the seventy-fifth year it was decided in helsinki that the border will not be changed, they have changed, where are these laws international norms of law to act no, and he is today formally, in principle, there is, i’m already silent about the security council without a decision, which includes both libya and iraq and they bomb everything else. is it really possible that this is all a methodology that needs to be understood, but

what they are doing today we need to draw conclusions and lessons from what we have already gone through, having lost a powerful power, then the soviet union will remain on this side of the iron zone. you know that it is belarus and russia that will remain examples of this now. kazakhstan is now waggling a little, but uzbekistan will come, the turkmens will return, so far, taking into account the fact that there is oil there. everything else is a little old. this is what is happening today in the post-soviet. oddities and we will see this will take months, years, but will be united at a new level. here is the post-soviet space, which, by the way, dugin is talking about, the world will happen in this version, a person will not rule the world, the americans will no longer rule the world, and the anglo-saxons will all completely depart in this. why do i say many years ahead

, joseph stalin foresaw this at one time when he talked with kollontai in the thirty-ninth year, she went to sweden was. he talked about this, what will happen to us when world zionism comes to power. here's someone who doesn't know. let him look, get on the internet, and that's it. this case will find one to one everything was foreseen in the thirty- ninth year, if i'm not mistaken, agitators propagandists, supermen of the german walkie-talkie, fucking conspired from her people history and in a generation there will be a crowd, and in the next generation it will be a herd. we see it sometimes, but if we talk about trying, then the second iron. height on mine look, here, uh, hmm, there is such a moment. uh, it seems that they cut off us belarusians russians, but in fact in my opinion. eh, an attempt is being made. uh, isolate the population. the west

should endocrine it for precisely those tasks that , uh, probably stand and are set by the collective west, led by the usa and great britain. there may be various scenarios here. uh, up to military scenarios, the development of the situation. uh, because, of course, uh, it is neither belarus nor russia that is disadvantageous as a submissive country that does not want to live in the rules of the anglo-saxons, and therefore now an attempt is being made to demonize such a very tough demonization. uh, belarusians, russians, uh, in order to solve problems by the economic method. so we see it’s not quite possible to solve problems by other methods, but for this it is necessary to prepare

our population, which would accept and accept the decision with these means , up to the military, and, well, let’s put it in simple terms. criticized the governments of these yes, therefore, of course. e, it's sad that, uh, here we are again back to what went from what 30 plus years ago, despite the fact that, of course, two poles existed. uh, the united states, the soviet union was in general balance, well, the socialist camp, of course , was in general balance, uh, forces and this balance of forces. he helped in a more, peaceful, calm environment to resolve development issues. uh, as the capitalist camp, let's say so

, the socialist camp, maybe we went at a slightly different pace, uh, with different guidelines, and value orientations. but we have seen what it is to plunge into that capitalism. uh, let's say with an inhuman face and ian must say that i have been working for a very long time . uh, in the capitalist countries of the united states of america, in other countries , i went on a business trip and saw it. e, like the other side of that world, when e and we saw when the viral infection began and when e in the united states could not help ordinary people. e help, they died, they were simply stored in refrigerators in new york. that is, it is about

today, of course, an attempt is being made to solve e. these are already talking not even about rivalry, but about open struggle. ah, for the new world order. of course, the west would not and does not want to give up its positions and absolutely allows entry. uh, all the whole toolkit all the toolkit. and here's what did n't work. i would like to throw here a bridge to what i said, my colleague failed to make hitler hitler e during the second world war, thanks to the solidarity of those nations and peoples of the soviet union we survived that terrible e war in fact, a was about to be a disaster for not just for the country, but.

the peoples who inhabited here, and as for the historical process, it is probably still formed and made by people by people. and so, when generations change, when there is no serious historical continuity. yes, yes, historical memory, and then they begin. it would seem repeated cataclysms and we can conclude that e humanity does not learn lessons. why did the soviet union then lose, well, in the ideological war? i'll start with a little another, then i'll just hold on to a colleague and continue the thought of the matter. that's what, at one time in georgian, he very wisely said that the slavs, namely the russian belarusian ukrainians.

the most recalcitrant people conquer it. it is impossible to just destroy it, what they did, and they went to ensure that the slavs began to fight among themselves, for example, ukraine has an old dream of pitting the slavs against each other. that's what we are talking about, as for the period that we are talking about, then it was lost, in principle. system why because after the soviet union did not collapse, but was destroyed artificially, and the traitors, including the leadership of the communist party of the soviet union, were there, led by this gorbachev and yakovlev. it was necessary to somehow see the new world. yes, and they began to tell us about democracy, freedom, human rights, the rights of the child, and so on. all this was aimed at changing our consciousness, when consciousness changes in the head in the heart, love slowly fades into the background ideologically processed absolutely

right and in connection with this the whole system institutions in america in england in other capitalist ones worked to ensure that this rebellious people. first, to tear the slavs away from other peoples. what stalin also warned about at one time, that they would tear them away from the russian people, and they would be their main enemies, all this happened, and we see this matter, and if we draw conclusions today, we will understand that a person has life on earth given once, regardless of what kind it is. what nationality should we learn to live humanly, treat each other, understand each other and help. this is our slavic tradition of being a friend , comrade brother, but i would like to return to the message that you, and then further, do we have friends or with whom we will have to build in these conditions, yes, build a new life, but i i agree, of course, first of

all. these are the countries of the post-soviet space, of course, everyone has it now. e hmm your goals your tasks. i have e, national everyone is now striving to realize national interests, despite the fact that the soviet union collapsed, but the cis was formed and at the very least, but exists solves a lot of problems, primarily in the field of the economy, and building a free economic zone between our countries. e next. we have created the eurasian economic union, probably more effectively. yes, he is more efficient. this is a more advanced integration, primarily economic integration, but also, of course, the collective security treaty organization of the collective security treaty organization. uh, it decides first of all issues related to the security of our

countries and uh, these are the ones coming from the circle of countries, but we have to say that why today the west is so belligerent. because new centers of power are being formed, they are being formed in southeast asia , and in africa and the middle east, not to mention the european, uh, the european region, they are in latin america, of course, if hugo chavez had survived there then we would probably see more. eh, there was some kind of a certain rollback of a serious trend, but now the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction again and is a mercenary. these are countries that, in principle, this association can become a center of power in latin america, we are now with these countries. and, of course, the shanghai

cooperation organization, about which we should first of all, probably also talk, and this will most likely be very uh, serious uh. and the recognition of the efforts and results of the work of belarus on international platforms, uh, and first of all, first of all, the head of state, his position, his e political will, if it weren’t there. but the lack of will of gorbachev and other leaders of the communist party of the soviet union actually allowed, uh, to destroy the soviet union, therefore i want to say that we are not alone, not only, uh, the countries of the post-soviet space. those who are members of the cis are with us now on international platforms, of course, the united states is already processing it. eh, they are trying to work all the countries so that they act, so to speak, as a united front against. uh,

primarily the russian federation but the africans others say, you know europe is not the whole world. that is, we will not give in. we would like to cooperate and cooperate and will not let ourselves be urged on, so let's just say this is quite difficult right now situation. and i think that it will m-m develop with all, with all, as it were, efforts. uh, the west, uh, still, uh, hmm , these centers will gain strength, uh, which will form the u polycentric world, uh, and, in which, uh, the republic of belarus you know what is interesting, because in this polycentric world. e yes, we are geographically located in europe and it would seem. well, here we are, yes, at this point of power. but no, i think that you see us, the sco is already accepting us, which

means, yes, yes, that is, we will be and in the center of power, uh, there, and i'm sure we are well and in latin america are and there is interest. to cooperation to development of interaction, so we will be present in different geopolitical regions. uh, the president has always said that we don't have geopolitical ambitions, but we have geopolitical interests first and foremost. this is related to e. the form in which our state exists is a socially oriented state, on the one hand, and on the other hand, an export- oriented state is very important, so it is very important for us to be in various e participate in various geopolitical associations when cut off from one part. there, sushi from different countries first of all

affects the economy, because the logistics chains are broken, what we can produce ourselves, what we cannot produce another question is, who are we friends with and how can we and, by the way, a counter-argument is always, and when they say about the ussr what they say that when people went they saw after the deficit that was in the ussr and this is also one of the counterarguments that a closed economy will not be able to meet the needs, after we are used to living in abundance. you know, i will again hold a colleague in the near future for a year, two three five, we will see that we will add friends and changes will take place in the world. and now, a polycentric world that would begin to take shape, because this is a historical break, and today, from the point of view of the laws of social development, it already works that version of the world order, people will not be tired of living under a whip and only with the money they want to be people. and now

all this will happen, as for the experience of this, then it must be taken. don't do it anymore conclusions and the absolutely correct position of the leadership of our country, when they left the socially oriented position of building a new belarusian state at this stage and people feel free here. but sometimes we go into consumerism. unfortunately, we need to save that 's all, why because only this socially oriented state allows a person to be a person to work, learn to be treated and that's it. rest. what is the role of the state? find more in other countries so that it is the same as in belarus today and our union and allied states with russia are an example for many. and now this crisis is happening, it is going through stages, and we will see the world change, this is unequivocal, but belarus is not ready to lower this iron curtain and

an example of this is the decision of the head of state to actually open the border for citizens of poland lithuania latvia estonia for our neighbors who can now safely cross the border and come to the republic of belarus. what kind of people's diplomacy? she works? it works, of course, but it must be very like this on both sides. it's a two-way road, of course. it has a very strong impact on people there. e. well, pay attention to what we were once accused of in the days of the soviet union, that we forbid me to travel abroad, we don’t issue jammers. eh, so there are some other passports. yes, it's a whole. yes, the whole was an event today doing it in the west in the west, that is, in fact , uh, demonstrate some fear of fear before, uh, in front of us from the other side. it

seems to me that maybe they should be afraid why because we are in these 30 years of very complex and difficult, when we really built and began to build our sovereign state on the ruins. e of the soviet union er, when we were the assembly shop of the soviet union yes, without resources, without resources, we restored the machine building industry and the petrochemical industry because we have a very small percentage of localization, but you know, uh. if we now go on this topic again, then i want to tell you that u why the president u criticizes, because uh, today this is how the world and international economic relations work that our partners. uh, well, too. they have their own interests, they are not only interested in buying. we have goods. they have an interest in

creating a product together. that's why we, too, if, well, let's say. uh, entered into cooperation with the people's republic of china, then it should be cooperation on an equal footing and beneficial to both the chinese side and the belarusian side, therefore, of course, it is necessary, uh, higher localization in manufacturing there as well. uh, bicycles. e motorcycles. uh, geely and so further and the like. well, we have a lot of specific examples. eh, let's even say so. here is an example of the minsk automobile plant, when we had options to always install a motor from western manufacturers. well, our leadership got its bearings just in time and, together with the people's republic of china, built a plant. e near minsk, releasing the necessary e motor, which is

also installed on our trucks. ez the correctness of the strategy that was chosen by our state and the president. uh when we uh let's just say, they didn't put, uh, everything in one basket, but tried to work in different markets, no matter how hard it was, no matter how far away, when they said, well, well, why go to latin america or to southeast asia there very e big unfavorable. uh, but today it shows, uh, the situation that u prices are changing, pricing is changing and even long-distance deliveries. they become quite profitable and the one who entered these markets is economically profitable, the one who entered these markets, the one who managed, is actively working there and now, so i emphasize once again the thought, belarus does not lower the iron

curtain. on the contrary, she resists, probably, we are against it. this and uh we are ready to work. uh, both with the east and with the west with the south with the north, that is, absolutely with those who? e. today is ready to work with us this curtain is lowered against us. you look at more than 20 years of economic political sanctions have now moved into the sphere of culture and sport. well, how is it possible and they want to say that they are really democrats. they are imposing this on us from the point of view that we should be free and so on, and the result of all their non-democracy. we can see where they went with their troops, changing leadership and so on, and how it ended. therefore, we need to preserve our belarusianness. our slavs are our customs, traditions and cultures. only then will we be able to have a very interesting

meaningful conversation in belarus and i really hope that belarus can face all these geopolitical storms. you are even stronger. thank you thank you here, watch the news now hello alexander lukashenko advised europe to undress, strain and work in abundance in the european union, the president told reporters during a visit to the minsk mechanical plant named after vavilov the holding's management company. bill is crazy. the state's focus is on the latest developments of the enterprise. whose high-tech products are exported to more than 30 countries, the production capacity allows