righteous, well, this is where my atheistic propaganda will end. i realized that it was none of my business. and i should not be an atheist, but such a page of my history of my life was judge for yourself a page of pride or this page of mm sadness, but i want to return to what you father fyodor just said. uh, as i understand it, and you know, i would not deny this and would not push it away, according to the popular saying, after all, there are jambs, in the history of any nation, someone has started wars enough. take germany, what they can write down as assets the great intervention against europe and then the soviet union, first of all, that they unleashed such a massacre and, worst of all, killed so many people. well, here i was prepared with information that 50 million people died on the planet. well, if only 50 more. with us, igor, about 30

million died, maybe more, but the chinese during this time is also the second world war. consider they lost more than 30 million people there at home. well, i don't count the japanese, who also fought, and so on and so forth, so i think we are somewhere under 70, and maybe more than millions, then lost hmm during the great patriotic war. and i understand. those post-war generations did not really want to highlight this figure, that 30 million people died in our soviet union. maybe more people, because it is unpleasant for the leadership of any country when people die in your country and for some reason could not prevent the war war is not only forgive me for calling this word jambs. it's not only uh, bad for those and it's the lack of those who attacked like fascist germany led by u sadolf

hitler - this is also our great shortcoming. we must agree that we did not do everything in order to prevent the great patriotic war, apparently, not everything went so smoothly, but no one knows how it was now, no one is me, like, already a politician. here i speak as a historian who is trying to get to the bottom of something and draw some significant conclusions there. uh, there is always a political overtone of specific events. nobody needs. so it will be difficult at times. that's where to get into this historical gray hair and evaluate certain events. so father fyodor we understood, uh from your statement, that after all, uh, well, not only the leadership of the country, but also the people of kohl, he tolerated this policy and perceived it as

anti-spiritual, let's say. this is the fault of our people. and here are yours from the point of view. and first of all, i want to support you. although you say that i highly lol want to support that i also studied such a subject as scientific atheism at the art academy. and the lecturer that we had. i once asked a question in an exam. any science is the subject of study of something or someone there? electro agreed with me but atheism initially denies the existence of subjects of study can be a science. he smiled and says that you asked the truthful i put a four instead of a five. well, now, if i may, here's the merits, but also very

honest truthfully. i specifically as a completely minister asked you this question, a little provocative. yes, you know education has always been created to translate the value of what it is from time immemorial. power decides. it’s good if it’s your own, and sorry, not for the bumpy one. no, and there was no neutral education. developing in non-state interests no, and there were no societies. without ideology and moral morality. if this suddenly happened. it was death throes. now when is the

undeclared third world war actually going on in the world? against humanity and humanity our education system is simply obliged. is obliged to revise even at the level of objects the transmitted values ​​up to the creation of a new science not just a textbook if they tell me that science is objective, i will doubt the same way as atheists perceive faith. any the sphere of human life serves the interests of the state or other authorities. and everything in this world can be scientifically substantiated. remember how

quickly did all the subjects in our universities change in the early nineties? perhaps only the exact sciences have remained true to themselves, because the equation cannot be altered. all others have submitted to the liberal values ​​of the masters who decide the fate of the world. from all that has been said, i dare to wish that everyone who works. and at bsu how better is the scientific laboratory of the country and the incubators of modern thought in others leading universities of the capitals of the capital and regional centers. he joined himself and involved young people in active work on the creation of science. serving

the interests of belarus not serving, not serving us, teach alexander grigorievich, but creative, striving to glorify the country and people, ensure prosperity, preserve and transmit the primordially traditional value. just please do not look for anything sensible in paganism, it is typical for consciousness, or a baby, or an endangered species, clearly father. fedor, i didn’t pull your tongue. i will think about your proposal over those people who will do it. thank you, be prepared for this too, well, dear friends. i am a teacher teacher. today i noticed that you

did not waste your time in vain, and none of you unexpectedly unexpectedly asked questions. uh, didn't hesitate. he found something to answer and i caught myself thinking. not only igor marzalyuk or father fyodor are, of course, great orators, er, but every one of you is here. those who answered my questions could give a whole lecture on this topic. it's good. it makes me happy. it says that the future will probably be in good hands. although alive. we see. life changes people, instead of people changing life. well, it probably never will. we are changing lives. it changes us happens with this cross-fertilization. and i also rejoiced at what you said, why will you now

understand? everything i say. you will find in mine everything that you have said, you will find in my speech. it's great. so our thoughts coincided with you. let's try to talk about this topic again. after all, the dialogue generations is always very interesting. it is conducted all my life every day, both at your house and at my place. as you can guess, and today, taking into account the format of the meeting. it can be said to sound throughout the country. it already sounds understand that you are very different. everyone has their own opinion, your civil outlook. almost formed. although believe me not completely. fate will more than once correct many views on life and more than once will force

them to return to what was sewn in. in the process of a person’s earthly earthly existence, it happens every day and every hour and every year, but my task as a president to share with you ignorance of history, although i myself, by my first education and not even a personal view of the events of today, and above all , it can be a political experience. therefore, the topic of today's lesson sounds like historical memory is dear to the future. we have already noted that without what we have lived without what we have lived without our history , there will be no future. not even the future, we will not be able to assess today's events without knowing our stories, it is relevant both in the context of the year of historical memory and in in the context of recent events in belarus around

us in ukraine, russia and in the whole world. least of all, i would like our communication to turn into a classic lecture, so i, uh, started our conversation. as a lesson and immediately answer all sorts of claims against me, i didn’t ask for this lesson. i have already gone through this stage at school in universities at lectures that i read at one time, you asked for a lesson. well, a lesson according to all the laws of the lesson taught us. so teaching teaching methodology. well, let's say a story, when a teacher or teacher, especially later, but for a long time, the class came, he began to get acquainted with this class. ask any questions. well, i did just that, so claims. not to me, again , to those igor methodists who taught us.

uh, some are still alive and well, thank god from the height of this experience. i would like to ask the first question. i was preparing to speak to you on it, but this question has already been raised, it sounds like who we are belarusians and where are our roots. i am asking this question not by chance lately. it is from this fact that i want to push off. chancellorshultz said that allegedly from conversations with vladimir putin, the president of russia, they discussed almost the future of belarus well , in general, if this was the case, then this is very incorrect. in general, as a politician, i am not a supporter of discussing. other countries of other politicians behind their backs should be discussed in their presence. that's why it doesn't. if this is

so, it does not honor not only putin , whom he tried to blame or expose there, but also to himself. well, forgive him, i called his group boys there, but not because he discussed the future behind my back my country. the very essence of the conversation, allegedly, belarus is unknown, that it is not known from where the country does not have the right to exist. i do this very often in a narrow circle. uh, at the post-soviet conference table. before the republics said, so this question cannot be raised at all. well, once in some century there was no such country. i'm not talking about belarus now. so what? no need to take a dip

in the gray tour, an average evening. as i mumble, i show or yasha somewhere and look from there. does the being of an astronomer have the right or not? well we once had such a discussion. uh, included all the presidents. i listened to it all. listened. i'm tired of all this, and so i joked and ended this dialogue. uh, ska- well, what do you need nazarbayev was then president. uh, i turned to him and said, listen, well, if you plunge into it, it seems that half of russia is not this is not current russia, this is yours there, the times of the golden horde there, and so on and so forth. that is, if we go far and deep into it, then we will not understand at all, who we are, not only belarusians, but also others, therefore, as a historian of his time. i tried to

get to the bottom of some basics, but i noticed you. here, sitting at the table, what not to do. uh, because our history is always political, to say the least. and politics has always harmed, uh, objectivity has always been adjusted to something for this policy. it’s not good for me somehow. hmm, it was necessary to say after the great patriotic war that so many died there? someone died, it was not good to say that somewhere there lithuanians, poles or ukrainians were burning. they killed and so on. well, we bastards didn't say that khatyn are fascists, such all sorts of germans, uh, poisoned, beaten, and so on, but there were still playing their role and other peoples who were in the united soviet union, this was for the sake of politics and in general, as a politician. i am now looking at the

history that i studied in a special way. look here the guys raised the topic. well, casually the thirties. well, this is very important for scientists. that's the thirties hmm, so it was not so the great patriotic war. i always critically approached these moments in the thirties . there is no smoke without fire, i will say right away, but who knows what really happened, why was why it happened? no one knows until no one knows and no one has said it openly. why, because a new generation of politicians and leaders of the same soviet union they tried to cross out everything that was still exactly the same in the thirties or take the personality of lavrenty beria well, an enemy of the people, well, such and such, but appreciating

today, getting some other information. well, maybe he was a bad person, but i think that we exist today and still crusades from there did not start like that through belarus there further to the east also because this one was. and who led the process of creating nuclear weapons of nuclear weapons, which i do not accept hate at all, but which, fortunately for us, we have in this case in russia and this is a deterrent. they would have already ground and trampled upon us long ago if they were not afraid of the response of nuclear weapons, and this is stalin and beria but it also happened and no one will dispute this. i know this for sure, so spitting on this or that page stories of certain people, one must be very careful. a good

idea sounded from fedor, always even bad things, bad expressions of the word, one’s behavior must be presented. well, i won’t say that i’m different in this work, i probably have this. although this is not an excuse, but i heard it, you always have to approach it with kindness. therefore, history is a science such a complex process is very complex without it it is impossible impossible. neither today nor tomorrow. but one must always be as objective as possible, no matter how it may be, even though the subjects create it. and gotta be, well can be both spiritual and truthful, this is important. from above, as i said, i would like to ask this question from the height of our today, where are our roots? what should we understand when we open the basic law,

which igor mavzolyuk spoke about here, our roots are very ancient. and from these positions , no one can reproach us, not scholts, no one, that we are from nowhere, that we do not have these roots, that we do not have the right to our own state, to our sovereignty and independence, our ancestors built the first state in polotsk principality in the tenth century. you see, in tune with what was said, i am not imposing a totalitarian person on you, but this came from you, and you all said that you were a striped principality. we are from there for another tenth day. this is the holy land, the cradle of the belarusian statehood in search, which was one of the three key centers of ancient russia along with nougat kiev. and later other principalities appeared for a long time. their rules are the same while on other lands the

prince or kiev proteges. i mean, it was um. here is our origin. that is statehood was already distinguished by its independence, another ancient state on our lands, the turov principality, yes, politically, it was more connected with kievan rus, but it had a special status. note that it was not just e as some kind of slave principality e was subordinated. no, it had a special status and scientists are considering it, well, some strong pressure from kievan rus yes , not only that, that there in kievan rus they somehow pressed this russian, it was so valued in kievan rus so appreciated turov, the principality was very appreciated. i especially note this. at it was ruled by the future heirs of the kiev throne, that is, from turovo to kiev to the empire . it was a spiritual and cultural educational

center in our southern lands. you studied the biography of cyril of turov, an outstanding east slavic educator zlatoust , his teachings were widely known in the slavic lands and beyond the borders of ancient russia , i remember when i became a snotty young president. i went to the cavity and tour. and what you see today in polotsk tours. we then started it. i was still an atheist father fyodor was, but i understood, this is ours this is ours this is native. whatever it was, and we restored everything that was sacred in the strip and revived the one who was seen did not see. go, look at the tour and those museums of tours and from the level a little er, i lagged behind, and then i insisted that these two centers were the northern and southern ones from there. our mother earth went, maybe she went

over a little, but i really wanted it to be like the president already. we are just as proud that in our family there was a great woman who was said here the first belarusian holy educator and politician. she had the right to personally sign documents and had, as you know, in her shoulder. i have already talked about this, how much do you know in the history of that era of women who could afford to conduct diplomatic correspondence with the peasant rulers. they listened to her, and most importantly, she dedicated her life to the great mission to establish your own slavic lands of the world on the mired civil strife. this is also very important for our people, when our rulers gave birth at the origins for peace and in this mission is the root of the belarusian peacefulness and good neighborliness, which is part of

our mentality, determine the policy of modern belarus in general, the most difficult time was the eleventh century. in ancient russia, there was a struggle for the power of the earth, even then this internal division was tried to be used by forces hostile to the slavs back in the west, and they then had a plausible pretext to carry christian values, because they know how, as they do it now, too, you drew parallels with fire and sword. and what helped our ancestors to survive in this most difficult geopolitical situations slavic brotherhood clear unity understanding where the enemy is and where the brother is in the face of an external threat, they cast aside insults, stopped strife, the country became, and the grand duchy was created to protect the common home, the lithuanian russian zhelmorsky , which here igor spoke the question the following

is, whose it was a state now there is a lot of controversy fixation on some three points of view, either southerners, or, uh, lithuanians, or it didn’t go there, someone, uh, poles, there, and so on. this is a pier and they were e state is nothing of the sort. i have already said that the modern lithuanians have actually privatized heritage is a state entity. actually. look what was lithuanian there, for example, our language is written in the constitution on it. the statute is the dominant faith orthodoxy the territory of the belarusian, ukrainian partly russian lands, and the belarusian lands and the belarusian ethnos were the state-forming people of more than 80% of ours. this is the slavs and that's it. this is territory. people language cultural traditions. there are basic attributes of statehood. there is no sovereignty.

without these attributes of our belarusian statehood, it was during this period that our belarusian nationality was formed and at a time when roman law dominated western europe, our ancestors lived according to their own laws did not follow european fashion, and the lithuanians at that time had no written language at all . and who is there? who won? as some say, we ourselves were masters of our own land. it was slavic cohesion that helped stop german aggression for more than 500 years of half a millennium. arshan mstislav guns, together with smolenskaya, showed special stamina and courage on the grenval battlefield and wrote about it. pay attention to the polish side.

written by historical standards. almost in the wake of the battle in just a few decades. we will still appreciate this heroic feat of our ancestors, and i am convinced that our historians, perhaps you, have already received the appropriate education. be sure to do this, and then the story was even more interesting, our yesterday's allies in grunwald. we were betrayed to this battle. and expressed in modern language, they were framed during the livonian war, the ruling elite of the polish kingdom pushed their foreheads together, the grand duchy of lithuania and the russian kingdom, special in our history and e, russian history, such a special nuance always deceived us, always pushed us. why do historians need to answer this question? this is very important from a spiritual and moral point of view. taking advantage of the weakening on

, poland actually twisted the hands of our ancestors, seized the ukrainian lands and forced the grand duchy of lithuania to sign the union of lublin already, then they needed our land, this idea still excites the minds of the polish elites i have nothing for the polish people no complaints. bye. you know? the current politicians, whose head is boiling or in the head is boiling. and answer yourself. is it possible to create a former state formation on deceit, betrayal, oppression of peoples? of course, there is no speech of the commonwealth - this is the clearest example of how it is impossible to build a union state. although in that union state i did not plunge deeply into this, but as far as i known. the grand duchy of lithuania was

a fairly independent, very independent entity, and even a very advanced one, it is impossible to take away from the peoples of the allies their language, culture, faith, to humiliate their dignity. and all this was in the commonwealth, after all, what does the state rest on the people, and what can be expected when part of the people is destroyed, the spiritual society is culturally split with such an internal policy, the commonwealth could not be a state association in the past. came to ruin. as they began, so they ended with the divisions of the lands between neighbors the following question arises. and what the belarusians gave us, the next period of our history during the period of the russian empire , a lot of efforts were made by local and foreign scientists to discredit this period. well, most likely russophobes objectively precisely. in this state of

belarus was formed, as a nation, our ancestors were part of three single states forming the people of the great russians empire. belarusians and little rousseau, in other words, russian belarusians and ukrainians, you see, there are already three peoples in that russian empire from some was the nineteenth century. well, the beginning somewhere , these three peoples have already appeared. and belarusians among these two most powerful great peoples are on an equal footing in the speech of the commonwealth, if it were not for its divisions, a national collapse awaited us. in the best case, today we would call ourselves orthodox poles, as tens of thousands of modern inhabitants are whitewashed, but i'm trying to compare, maybe the russian empire was also our country. we knew that

we live on our own land and in 1812 we fought for it against the troops united by napoleon in europe and i want to speak right away in that the russian empire was not all in chocolate for the belarusians. there were a lot of shortcomings. there were many difficult periods. europe at that time traditionally brought us the values ​​of mythical freedom, equality and brotherhood again with a sword and cunning, playing on thunderstorms, militia militia gentry and the restoration of the polish state. they always dreamed about it, but our ancestors did not fight for speech, the commonwealth for their fatherland together with the russian army, this war is for us and for the russians patriotic no matter what they say, liberal pro-western stories, a little more centuries have passed again, on our much suffering

land, war has come. the first world war and again the west added to these troubles a revolutionary upheaval, occupation, economic devastation. and that our neighbors in the person of the polish elites unleashed the polish-soviet war again with the same idea to grab a piece of our earth and almost all of it succeeded for almost 20 years, the belarusian people were torn to pieces. well, in this case, the risks of a peace treaty. this is probably already remembered by many. remember, our ancestors turned out to be the western belarussian figurines again under the heap of the polish lords, the palonization of confessional and socio-economic oppression. it's amazing how we survived in this whirlpool of events, moreover, we began to build our national statehood and, i note , on a soviet basis, and not under the kaiser's boot , individual figures

of the bnr somehow tried to make it, which remained a state on paper. it was then in this contradictory time of troubles, belarus became one of the founding republics of the union of soviet socialist republics, the most powerful state association, which became a real alternative to the western capitalist world order. note this mm russia ukraine belarus for the caucasian republics december, in my opinion, the process ended 22 years after the writing of the treaty. yes , we are close. equal among others, uh, again, i did n’t dive deep into these events, benerov’s and so on, when hmm, this whole mess happened, but what struck me was these leaders everywhere, uh, bnr before them and after them for some period. they were looking for something for themselves. they saw themselves as sharing power. they grizzly each other and things like that and that

the creation of the soviet union by this empire of the soviet union stopped and what was russia to do e to the kremlin in moscow, which nevertheless gathered these peoples, it was shown that they were better off in the soviet union and they showed and did a lot before the great patriotic war of the forty-first years of june months have done a lot for belarus belarus was given. it was reborn then, therefore, well, again , everything was in this period of time and there were mistakes and there were shortcomings and there were systemic errors. i often give an example. e on the great patriotic war, yes, the nazis attacked. yes? bastards are all sorts, and we and we why having such an army? why, in principle, even weapons, well, they don’t talk about plywood

planes there, although i couldn’t and deliver a lot of trouble, but why for several months they admitted that the germans passed like uh, a hot knife through butter through belarus approached smolensk and moscow why why on the eve of the war? the strongest stationed in belarus western belarusian kiev military districts, why did all the officers go on vacation? why was there such relaxation? excuse me for this word in this period of time. why did we see what was happening and intelligence informed the top leadership of the country. uh, from all sides, the same sorge called from japan a specific date for the war. why did we set up this kingdom and did not pay attention to it? why did the germans cross into our border in a day and cut out all the guards in belarus, primarily railway bridges and ordinary bridges. there, the red

army guarded everyone, and in the form of the red army they began to guard these bridges. why if we destroyed these bridges to the germans the wooded swampy area in belarus would not be easy to overcome with their equipment, it’s not easy, but they walked along the roads, because we made bungling and it cost us millions of lives, and for us belarus you will notice and then from east to west and back there - here, people went through us and we often turned out to be a theater of military operations. i often use this word we led. not our war , we were forced to fight. therefore, the soviet union was created and we are equal there. next

question. what do you know about this soviet time? why do i ask, because during the years of perestroika and the collapse of the soviet union for this period, the game of dirt is full of sorties. everything was. the great victory was also spat upon, great achievements in the culture of art, breakthroughs in the science of technology, the result is obvious. the soviet union of ruins, the memory of him is defamed. but it was a country that our grandfathers and great- grandfathers arranged, who were respected in the world, with which achievements were also considered, which, such as the first space flight of the building of the first nuclear reactor of the first computer and many others, shocked peace. we were leaders in this regard , moreover, but this is already in my time, first of all, not a single issue in the world. not a single issue was resolved without the soviet union, it was impossible

to imagine that a war could start somewhere. without the approval or tacit consent of the soviet country, the americans were afraid to think that they could get involved in the soviet troops on the opposite side, and this balanced the planet. this is multipolarity. well, let's say bipolarity then. it was in soviet times that we returned to our territories, and today we returned to our calendar an important date in our history september 17 , 1939 is the day of the reunification of the belarusian people after decades of polish occupation. now this is our day of national unity, which we will soon celebrate, because we remember everything, fortunately, at least we belarusians have preserved the historical memory and the truth about that world war ii and the great patriotic war. we

remember the unprecedented heroism of the multinational soviet people, thanks to, who survived in these terrible trials and was not forgotten. what exactly are western democracies raised the nazi monster nazi germany to crush the soviet union and then conquer the whole world to cover the brown plague. this is a tragic page in our history, the belarusian people survived the infusion. genocide, its scale, we still have to comprehend, evaluate and present to the world. do all of you know the names of the heroes who stopped the nazi death machine know, in honor of whom our streets are named only among the natives, belarus 73 full holders of the order of glory almost 450 heroes of the soviet union 449, including four twice heroes ivan yakubovsky stepan shutov pavel golovachev iosif

gasavrovsky about his heroes snowfields. you definitely need to know efrosinina zenkov. zinaida tailor marat kazey boris tsarikov and others as for the assessment of the soviet period as a whole, what neoliberal elites are silent about is that it was during the soviet era that the economic socio-cultural scientific potential was formed, due to which many post-soviet countries still live, and so are we and say that we had to destroy it all just as our neighbors did at the behest of western advisers. this is already my period of the mid-nineties after the collapse of the soviet union, when crowds came to us in a totalitarian state and offered me money, they gave it forty. the first one to come brought money for historical truth for textbooks and so on. i honestly tell him

sincerity, - mr. soros said, as i remember now, that case, you don’t come to us anymore. i will not implement this policy. and that's when i became a totalitarian dictator, then i became hated, and our country, including for what for what we wanted to write, themselves their textbooks. you know what they were then because we ourselves wanted to build our lives to be sovereign and independent. and look what happened to the baltic states of ukraine, where the abandoned factories of the factory forever lost their unique competencies, skills, and they were on a par with belarus in their development. and in some ways they were superior , especially in ukraine. corporations today, even a drought in europe and where strawberries grew, i worry that there are not enough workers in ukraine, these

poor people used to go and pick these strawberries in western countries in poland, first of all, but today there are not enough workers. i didn't want people to go there as slaves. well, who went i. we don’t hold back and would like for one of you to rush there after our meeting . and what are these? people are different from the natives in the european colonial empires , these lithuanians are part of the ukrainians more than 3 million. as a result of this operation, only those who put on nazi uniforms fight with a monument, which the monuments cannot answer are silent. they cannot answer, but we are living people. we have to respond to this and we see what happens to people when they see a seventy-eight or eighty-millimeter stella, which

symbolized the liberation of latvia, which collapsed into this lake there. why fight with this, and it was planned for us after the collapse of the soviet union and several years of rule here by our nationalists. i won't name them otherwise. it all started with the streets being renamed. yes communization, lustration and other people began to cut and divide. i know that you cost me and some of them present here to stop it all and as shown, the twentieth year. we haven't done everything yet. so what now? unfortunately, we live and do not know that there will be a war on the doorstep tomorrow, more than once in our history, the so-called western partners pushed three fraternal peoples of

belarusians into russian ukrainians with their foreheads, pushed us with their foreheads. well, they don't paint us. and what are we , that we don’t have brains or didn’t have? why did we let ourselves be pushed? and again on the horizon who? the same polish elites, and behind their backs, you know, 55, in my opinion, are already states. taking advantage of the situation, they are recreating a new speech, the commonwealth has already legally formalized their special privileges in ukraine, i once said on this occasion that i am afraid that ukrainians will soon have to stop any war with russia, turn to us to protect them from this colonization from this e quiet cunning. movement to the east from the territory of poland and other states, so that this ukraine is cut into pieces. yes, they have more and

ukraine today is on the way and everything looks. it is as if poland forgot about its territorial claims to ukraine, the pravolynsky massacre, and ukraine forgave everything that the poles did on their own, as they still consider eastern kresses. and along the way, the polish government profits from refugees, increases its weight in europe, while ukraine falls into the abyss, the ukrainian people are simply robbed. everything repeats itself, as in the first world war, peat scott grain was exported from belarus by trains, so today black soil is being transported from ukraine grain and other resources. where do you think to feed poor africa as they say in the media. no, all this is being taken to rich europe. and a new question. and what is the european union, the so-called

independent sources tell you that it is an association of sovereign states. i beg you, kavit showed when decisions were made to close borders, maintain a lockdown , distribute aid between countries who is in charge and who has what rights, and most importantly, not even in brussels i am the hegemon political center of the european union, located overseas, he thinks that the atlantic ocean will protect from everything. they will sit there, as they always want to say, the world will no longer be the same, the united states will no longer have a monopoly on decision-making for other countries and continents, the unipolar order is collapsing and new centers of power are emerging. this and china this and india this and russia the countries of the middle east latin america the world is waking up. therefore,

trying to keep control of the world's police officer of the united states is turning into a world terrorist. they destroy everything, which is a clear sign of crisis and weakness. we are it we observe today's tantrums afghan ukrainian taiwanese stuff. this is not politics. this is looting, and all over the world suffer, including the most devoted, ready to fulfill any will of the owner. satellite western europe is told that it is a subject of big politics, but this subjectivity turns into a multiple increase in energy prices. record inflation in fact, europe is on the verge of the most powerful food crisis in modern history, father. fedor god is, he punished them with this cruel one, a now terrible storms and floods. i don’t want to eat

anything, i don’t want to say roughly, there’s nothing to eat. at this time, they are still crushing no fence , building between the west and east along the border of belarus, a war to the last balts and to the last ukrainians. i know that many of you are wondering. and what's next, and what will happen to ukraine, it's nearby and it's not that it's nearby, it's our people and it's not that they are slavs, we are already our modern. eh, parents, your grandparents, yes, and maybe young people. we're already blood-bound with these with this ukrainian people, what will happen next no one knows, but we are afraid that this may lead to the most terrible clash. god forbid the most terrible most terrible weapon, the americans, seizing on

this one. well, i often tell my russian colleague a gift. after afghanistan, they quickly jumped out of there, they never did. will not leave, so as not to take this chance, well, by definition, let's be frank . russia cannot lose. russia cannot be defeated there, and i am in that. and many belarusians support russia in this regard. why are they accusing russia of being an aggressor? yes, we are together. no, if it hadn’t started then, the preventive special operation in belarus would have been first of all, a missile strike would have been launched. i talked about it a lot. i showed where in the south of belarus four complexes, four

divisions, or whatever the brigades of these weapons were installed, which were ready to strike in the south of our country, in part, because russian troops were still not withdrawn there after the exercise. yes, and we had to be pulled into this war. but 30 minutes before the announcement , i can already say this, a special military operation by the president of russia, we suppressed these points, the russians well done, they saw in time, prepared for an attack on the territory of belarus, it was along the entire perimeter of the border with the russian federation, and not ukrainians were preparing for this. look, neither the ukrainians were preparing for this, they were preparing for this back in the west in the united states of america and they will press this situation further. they will do everything to bring russia to its knees. russia cannot stand on

lap. so what? western europe is being told that it is like me already the second subject of big politics, but this subjectivity turns into a multiple increase in energy prices, carriers of record inflation , in fact, europe is on the verge of the most powerful food crisis in modern history. i repeat this to you again and in this reality. all of us who challenged the unfair unipolar world order, i offer the future to the strange european union. it's not all pants, idiots. everyone understands perfectly well where the happiness of the european union and all of europe is here in the euroset we need to come to an agreement we need to agree with us and the russian federation and unite the technological west, as i said, and the resource.